Ras and Rap1: two highly related small GTPases with distinct function

The Ras-like family of small GTPases includes, among others, Ras, Rap1, R-ras, and Ral. The family is characterized by similarities in the effector domain. While the function of Ras is, at least in part, elucidated, little is known about other members of the family. Currently, much attention is focused on the small GTPase Rap1. Initially, this member was identified as a transformation suppressor protein able to revert the morphological phenotype of Ras-transformed fibroblasts. This has led to the hypothesis that Rap1 antagonizes Ras by interfering in Ras effector function. Recent analysis revealed that Rap1 is activated rapidly in response to activation of a variety of receptors. Rap1 activation is mediated by several second messengers, including calcium, diacylglycerol, and cAMP. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) have been identified that mediate these effects. The most interesting GEF is Epac, an exchange protein directly activated by cAMP, thus representing a novel cAMP-induced, protein kinase A-independent pathway. Furthermore, Rap1 is inactivated by specific GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), one of which is regulated through an interaction with Galphai. While Ras and Rap1 may share some effector pathways, evidence is accumulating that Ras and Rap1 each regulate unique cellular processes in response to various extracellular ligands. For Rap1 these functions may include the control of cell morphology.     

Diacylglycerol kinase zeta regulates Ras activation by a novel mechanism

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) activate Ras by facilitating its GTP binding. Ras guanyl nucleotide-releasing protein (GRP) was recently identified as a Ras GEF that has a diacylglycerol (DAG)-binding C1 domain. Its exchange factor activity is regulated by local availability of signaling DAG. DAG kinases (DGKs) metabolize DAG by converting it to phosphatidic acid. Because they can attenuate local accumulation of signaling DAG, DGKs may regulate RasGRP activity and, consequently, activation of Ras. DGK zeta, but not other DGKs, completely eliminated Ras activation induced by RasGRP, and DGK activity was required for this mechanism. DGK zeta also coimmunoprecipitated and colocalized with RasGRP, indicating that these proteins associate in a signaling complex. Coimmunoprecipitation of DGK zeta and RasGRP was enhanced in the presence of phorbol esters, which are DAG analogues that cannot be metabolized by DGKs, suggesting that DAG signaling can induce their interaction. Finally, overexpression of kinase-dead DGK zeta in Jurkat cells prolonged Ras activation after ligation of the T cell receptor. Thus, we have identified a novel way to regulate Ras activation: through DGK zeta, which controls local accumulation of DAG that would otherwise activate RasGRP.     

Control of Ras cycling by Ca2+

Ras GTPases are binary switches, cycling between an inactive GDP-bound form and an active GTP-bound form at the membrane. They transduce signals into the cytoplasm via effector pathways that regulate cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis. Ras activation is enhanced by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs); deactivation is accelerated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). Recently, new roles for Ca(2+) and diacylglycerol (DAG) in the control of Ras cycling have emerged with the discovery of a series of novel GEFs and GAPs. These regulators of Ras cycling are likely to play a key role in the information processing of Ca(2+) and DAG signals.     

Rap1 GTPases: an emerging role in the cardiovasculature

The Ras related GTPase Rap has been implicated in multiple cellular functions. A vital role for Rap GTPase in the cardiovasculature is emerging from recent studies. These small monomeric G proteins act as molecular switches, coupling extracellular stimulation to intracellular signaling through second messengers. This member of the Ras superfamily was once described as the transformation suppressor with the ability to ameliorate the Ras transformed phenotype; however, further studies uncovered a unique set of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) and effector proteins for Rap suggesting a more sophisticated role for this small GTPase. At least three different second messengers can activate Rap, namely cyclic AMP (cAMP), calcium and diacylglycerol. More recently, an investigation of Rap in the cardiovasculature has revealed multiple pathways of regulation involving Rap in this system. Two closely related isoforms of Rap1 exist, 1a and 1b. Murine genetic models exist for both and have been described. Although thought at first to be functionally redundant, these isoforms have differing roles in the cardiovasculature. The activation of Rap1a and 1b in various cell types of the cardiovasculature leads to alterations in cell attachment, migration and cell junction formation. This review will focus on the role of these Rap1 GTPases in hematopoietic, endothelial, smooth muscle, and cardiac myocyte function, and conclude with their potential role in human disease.     

A novel <Emphasis Type="Italic">Dictyostelium</Emphasis> RasGEF required for chemotaxis and development

Background  

Ras proteins are guanine-nucleotide-binding enzymes that couple cell surface receptors to intracellular signaling pathways controlling cell proliferation and differentiation, both in lower and higher eukaryotes. They act as molecular switches by cycling between active GTP and inactive GDP-bound states, through the action of two classes of regulatory proteins: a) guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEFs) and b) GTP-ase activating proteins (GAPs). Genome wide analysis of the lower eukaryote Dictyostelium discoideum revealed a surprisingly large number of Ras Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (RasGEFs). RasGEFs promote the activation of Ras proteins by catalyzing the exchange of GDP for GTP, thus conferring to RasGEFs the role of main activator of Ras proteins. Up to date only four RasGEFs, which are all non-redundant either for growth or development, have been characterized in Dictyostelium. We report here the identification and characterization of a fifth non-redundant GEF, RasGEFM.     

Dynamic phospholipid signaling by G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control a variety of fundamental cellular processes by regulating phospholipid signaling pathways. Essential for signaling by a large number of receptors is the hydrolysis of the membrane phosphoinositide PIP(2) by phospholipase C (PLC) into the second messengers IP(3) and DAG. Many receptors also stimulate phospholipase D (PLD), leading to the generation of the versatile lipid, phosphatidic acid. Particular PLC and PLD isoforms take differential positions in receptor signaling and are additionally regulated by small GTPases of the Ras, Rho and ARF families. It is now recognized that the PLC substrate, PIP(2), has signaling capacity by itself and can, by direct interaction, affect the activity and subcellular localization of PLD and several other proteins. As expected, the synthesis of PIP(2) by phosphoinositide 5-kinases is tightly regulated as well. In this review, we present an overview of how these signaling pathways are governed by GPCRs, explain the molecular basis for the spatially and temporally organized, highly dynamic quality of phospholipid signaling, and point to the functional connection of the pathways.     

Molecular pathways of cyclic nucleotide-induced inhibition of arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation

Cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP) are second messengers involved in the intracellular signal transduction of a wide variety of extracellular stimuli. These signals regulate many biological processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis. Recently, significant progress has been achieved in the molecular basis underlying cyclic nucleotide regulation of cell proliferation. This review summarizes our knowledge of the signaling pathways regulated by cyclic nucleotides in arterial smooth muscle cells.     

Regulatory proteins of R-Ras, TC21/R-Ras2, and M-Ras/R-Ras3

We studied the regulation of three closely related members of Ras family G proteins, R-Ras, TC21 (also known as R-Ras2), and M-Ras (R-Ras3). Guanine nucleotide exchange of R-Ras and TC21 was promoted by RasGRF, C3G, CalDAG-GEFI, CalDAG-GEFII (RasGRP), and CalDAG-GEFIII both in 293T cells and in vitro. By contrast, guanine nucleotide exchange of M-Ras was promoted by the guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the classical Ras (Ha-, K-, and N-), including mSos, RasGRF, CalDAG-GEFII, and CalDAG-GEFIII. GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for Ras, Gap1(m), p120 GAP, and NF-1 stimulated all of the R-Ras, TC21, and M-Ras proteins, whereas R-Ras GAP stimulated R-Ras and TC21 but not M-Ras. We did not find any remarkable difference in the subcellular localization of R-Ras, TC21, or M-Ras when these were expressed with a green fluorescent protein tag in 293T cells and MDCK cells. In conclusion, TC21 and R-Ras were regulated by the same GEFs and GAPs, whereas M-Ras was regulated as the classical Ras.     

Dynamic phospholipid signaling by G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control a variety of fundamental cellular processes by regulating phospholipid signaling pathways. Essential for signaling by a large number of receptors is the hydrolysis of the membrane phosphoinositide PIP₂ by phospholipase C (PLC) into the second messengers IP₃ and DAG. Many receptors also stimulate phospholipase D (PLD), leading to the generation of the versatile lipid, phosphatidic acid. Particular PLC and PLD isoforms take differential positions in receptor signaling and are additionally regulated by small GTPases of the Ras, Rho and ARF families. It is now recognized that the PLC substrate, PIP₂, has signaling capacity by itself and can, by direct interaction, affect the activity and subcellular localization of PLD and several other proteins. As expected, the synthesis of PIP₂ by phosphoinositide 5-kinases is tightly regulated as well. In this review, we present an overview of how these signaling pathways are governed by GPCRs, explain the molecular basis for the spatially and temporally organized, highly dynamic quality of phospholipid signaling, and point to the functional connection of the pathways.     

New messages from old messengers: cAMP and mycobacteria

Cyclic nucleotides are ancient second messengers, and the enzymes that synthesize cAMP and cGMP [cyclic nucleotide monophosphates (cNMPs)] are encoded in the genomes of several bacteria. We focus here on recent biochemical and structural information on the proteins that make and break cyclic nucleotides in mycobacteria, namely the nucleotide cyclases and phosphodiesterases, respectively. The presence of these enzymes along with putative cNMP-binding proteins suggests an intricate regulation of cAMP metabolism and utilization by these organisms. It is anticipated that future research will be directed towards identifying cellular processes that are regulated by cAMP in mycobacteria and deciphering the cross-talk between mycobacterial pathogens and their eukaryotic host.     

Rap-linked cAMP signaling Epac proteins: compartmentation, functioning and disease implications

Epac proteins respond to the second messenger cyclic AMP (cAMP) and are activated by Gs coupled receptors. They act as specific guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the small G proteins, Rap1 and Rap2 of the Ras family. A plethora of studies using 8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP, an Epac agonist, has revealed the importance of these multi-domain proteins in the control of key cellular functions such as cell division, migration, growth and secretion. Epac and protein kinase A (PKA) may act independently but are often associated with the same biological process, in which they fulfill either synergistic or opposite effects. In addition, compelling evidence is now accumulating about the formation of molecular complexes in distinct cellular compartments that influence Epac signaling and cellular function. Epac is spatially and temporally regulated by scaffold protein and its effectors are interconnected with other signaling pathways. Pathophysiological changes in Epac signaling may underlie certain diseases.     

The guanine nucleotide exchange factor CNrasGEF activates ras in response to cAMP and cGMP

Small GTPase proteins such as Ras are key regulators of cellular proliferation and are activated by guanine nucleotide exchange/releasing factors (GEFs/GRFs). Three classes of Ras GRFs have been identified to date, represented by Sos1/2, Ras-GRF1/2 and Ras-GRP. Here, we describe a novel candidate Ras activator, cyclic nucleotide rasGEF (CNrasGEF), which contains CDC25, Ras exchange motif (REM), Ras-association (RA), PDZ and cNMP (cAMP/cGMP) binding (cNMP-BD) domains, two PY motifs and a carboxy-terminal SxV sequence. CNrasGEF can activate Ras in vitro, and it binds cAMP directly via its cNMP-BD. In cells, CNrasGEF activates Ras in response to elevation of intracellular cAMP or cGMP, or treatment with their analogues 8-Br-cAMP or 8-Br-cGMP, independently of protein kinases A and G (PKA and PKG). This activation is prevented in CNrasGEF lacking its CDC25 domain or cNMP-BD. CNrasGEF can also activate the small GTPase Rap1 in cells, but this activation is constitutive and independent of cAMP. CNrasGEF is expressed mainly in the brain and is localized at the plasma membrane, a localization dependent on the presence of intact PDZ domain but not the SxV sequence. These results suggest that CNrasGEF may directly connect cAMP-generating pathways or cGMP-generating pathways to Ras.     

Two subclasses of guanine exchange factor (GEF) domains revealed by comparison of activities of chimeric genes constructed from CDC25, SDC25 and BUD5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Guanine Exchange Factor (GEF) activity for Ras proteins has been associated with a conserved domain in Cdc25p, Sdc25p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and several other proteins recently found in other eukaryotes. We have assessed the structure-function relationships between three different members of this family in S. cerevisiae, Cdc25p, Sdc25p and Bud5p. Cdc25p controls the Ras pathway, whereas Bud5p controls bud site localization. We demonstrate that the GEF domain of Sdc25p is closely related to that of Cdc25p. We first constructed a thermosensitive allele of SDC25 by specifically altering amino acid positions known to be changed in the cdc25-1 mutation. Secondly, we constructed three chimeric genes from CDC25 and SDC25, the products of which are as active in the Ras pathway as are the wild-type proteins. In contrast, similar chimeras made between CDC25 and BUD5 lead to proteins that are inactive both in the Ras and budding control pathways. This difference in the ability of chimeric proteins to retain activity allows us to define two subclasses of structurally different GEFs: Cdc25p and Sdc25p are Ras-specific GEFs, and Bud5p is a putative GEF for the Rsr1/Bud1 Rap-like protein.     

Two subclasses of guanine exchange factor (GEF) domains revealed by comparison of activities of chimeric genes constructed from CDC25, SDC25 and BUD5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Guanine Exchange Factor (GEF) activity for Ras proteins has been associated with a conserved domain in Cdc25p, Sdc25p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and several other proteins recently found in other eukaryotes. We have assessed the structure-function relationships between three different members of this family in S. cerevisiae, Cdc25p, Sdc25p and Bud5p. Cdc25p controls the Ras pathway, whereas Bud5p controls bud site localization. We demonstrate that the GEF domain of Sdc25p is closely related to that of Cdc25p. We first constructed a thermosensitive allele of SDC25 by specifically altering amino acid positions known to be changed in the cdc25-1 mutation. Secondly, we constructed three chimeric genes from CDC25 and SDC25, the products of which are as active in the Ras pathway as are the wild-type proteins. In contrast, similar chimeras made between CDC25 and BUD5 lead to proteins that are inactive both in the Ras and budding control pathways. This difference in the ability of chimeric proteins to retain activity allows us to define two subclasses of structurally different GEFs: Cdc25p and Sdc25p are Ras-specific GEFs, and Bud5p is a putative GEF for the Rsr1/Bud1 Rap-like protein.     

Nucleotide binding switches the information flow in ras GTPases

The Ras superfamily comprises many guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) that are essential to intracellular signal transduction. The guanine nucleotide-dependent intrinsic flexibility patterns of five G proteins were investigated in atomic detail through Molecular Dynamics simulations of the GDP- and GTP-bound states (S(GDP) and S(GTP), respectively). For all the considered systems, the intrinsic flexibility of S(GDP) was higher than that of S(GTP), suggesting that Guanine Exchange Factor (GEF) recognition and nucleotide switch require higher amplitude motions than effector recognition or GTP hydrolysis. Functional mode, dynamic domain, and interaction energy correlation analyses highlighted significant differences in the dynamics of small G proteins and Gα proteins, especially in the inactive state. Indeed, S(GDP) of Gα(t), is characterized by a more extensive energy coupling between nucleotide binding site and distal regions involved in GEF recognition compared to small G proteins, which attenuates in the active state. Moreover, mechanically distinct domains implicated in nucleotide switch could be detected in the presence of GDP but not in the presence of GTP. Finally, in small G proteins, functional modes are more detectable in the inactive state than in the active one and involve changes in solvent exposure of two highly conserved amino acids in switches I and II involved in GEF recognition. The average solvent exposure of these amino acids correlates in turn with the rate of GDP release, suggesting for them either direct or indirect roles in the process of nucleotide switch. Collectively, nucleotide binding changes the information flow through the conserved Ras-like domain, where GDP enhances the flexibility of mechanically distinct portions involved in nucleotide switch, and favors long distance allosteric communication (in Gα proteins), compared to GTP.     

RasGRP proteins--Ras-activating factors

The Ras proteins, members of small GTP-binding protein family, are regulated through the exchange of GTP/GDP nucleotide. The activity of the Ras proteins is controlled by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTP-ase activating proteins (GAPs), which activate and inactivate G proteins respectively. Beside other, well known Ras-activating GEFs, the new class of such factors was recently described. RasGRP family, known also as CalDAG-GEF, consists of four members. C1 domain, allows them to bind diacylglycerol as well as DAG-analogs like phorbol esters. Binding of the ligand leads to activation of RasGRPs and in consequence to the activation of Ras and Rap proteins by the exchange of bounded guanine nucleotides. The signal transmitted by RasGRP is terminated as a result of DAG phosphorylation catalyzed by diacylglycerol kinase (DGK). Location of RasGRP proteins on the crossing of signaling cascades and broad tissue expression pattern involve them in many events essential for the cell function. RasGRP proteins play roles in such phenomena as: T cells maturation and functioning, B cells response, platelet aggregation, mast cells activity regulation, transformation and many other. In this review, structure and function of RasGRP proteins, as well as their role in neoplastic transformation are described.     

Octopamine-Mediated Neuromodulation of Insect Senses

Octopamine functions as a neuromodulator, neurotransmitter, and neurohormone in insect nervous systems. Octopamine has a prominent role in influencing multiple physiological events: (a) as a neuromodulator, it regulates desensitization of sensory inputs, arousal, initiation, and maintenance of various rhythmic behaviors and complex behaviors such as learning and memory; (b) as a neurotransmitter, it regulates endocrine gland activity; and (c) as a neurohormone, it induces mobilization of lipids and carbohydrates. Octopamine exerts its effects by binding to specific proteins that belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors and share the structural motif of seven transmembrane domains. The activation of octopamine receptors is coupled with different second messenger pathways depending on species, tissue source, receptor type and cell line used for the expression of cloned receptor. The second messengers include adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP), calcium, diacylglycerol (DAG), and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP₃). The cAMP activates protein kinase A, calcium and DAG activate protein kinase C, and IP₃ mobilizes calcium from intracellular stores. Octopamine-mediated generation of these second messengers is associated with changes in cellular response affecting insect behaviors. The main objective of this review is to discuss significance of octopamine-mediated neuromodulation in insect sensory systems.     

Treatment In vitro of Retinal Cells with IL-4 Increases the Survival of Retinal Ganglion Cells: The Involvement of BDNF

Interleukin 4 (IL-4) is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in many functions during the development as well as in adult life. Previous work from our group demonstrated, in vitro, that this interleukin is able to prevent rat retinal ganglion cells death after axotomy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the signaling pathways involved in this trophic effect, particularly the cAMP pathway and also to demonstrate the expression of IL-4 in retinas at different stages of post natal development. Our results show that the trophic effect of IL-4 on rat retinal ganglion cells is dependent on the activation of Janus Kinase 3, Protein Kinase A, c-Jun N-terminal Kinase and Tropomyosin related Kinase receptors, on the increase in intracellular calcium levels, on polypeptide release and on the endogenous Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF). We also observed that treatment with IL-4 enhances c-AMP response element binding and Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase phosphorylation and increases the expression of BDNF. Concerning the IL-4 expression our data show an increase in IL-4 levels during post natal development. Taken together our results demonstrate that the trophic effect of IL-4 on retinal ganglion cells of newborn rats is mediated by cAMP pathway and BDNF release.     

Glucose metabolism, second messengers and insulin secretion

Insulin secretion from beta cells of the islets of Langerhans in the endocrine pancreas is regulated by glucose, glucose metabolites, metabolic intermediates such as ATP, acetyl CoA and reduced pyridine nucleotides, and classical second messengers. Receptor responses transduced by guanine nucleotide binding proteins modulate metabolic activity, the generation of second messengers, and cell depolarization during stimulus-response coupling in the beta cell. This review will consider insulin secretion as regulated by glucose metabolic pathways and second messengers.     

Differential membrane binding and diacylglycerol recognition by C1 domains of RasGRPs

RasGRPs (guanine-nucleotide-releasing proteins) are exchange factors for membrane-bound GTPases. All RasGRP family members contain C1 domains which, in other proteins, bind DAG (diacylglycerol) and thus mediate the proximal signal-transduction events induced by this lipid second messenger. The presence of C1 domains suggests that all RasGRPs could be regulated by membrane translocation driven by C1-DAG interactions. This has been demonstrated for RasGRP1 and RasGRP3, but has not been tested directly for RasGRP2, RasGRP4alpha and RasGRP4beta. Sequence alignments indicate that all RasGRP C1 domains have the potential to bind DAG. In cells, the isolated C1 domains of RasGRP1, RasGRP3 and RasGRP4alpha co-localize with membranes and relocalize in response to DAG, whereas the C1 domains of RasGRP2 and RasGRP4beta do not. Only the C1 domains of RasGRP1, RasGRP3 and RasGRP4alpha recognize DAG as a ligand within phospholipid vesicles and do so with differential affinities. Other lipid second messengers were screened as ligands for RasGRP C1 domains, but none was found to serve as an alternative to DAG. All of the RasGRP C1 domains bound to vesicles which contained a high concentration of anionic phospholipids, indicating that this could provide a DAG-independent mechanism for membrane binding by C1 domains. This concept was supported by demonstrating that the C1 domain of RasGRP2 could functionally replace the membrane-binding role of the C1 domain within RasGRP1, despite the inability of the RasGRP2 C1 domain to bind DAG. The RasGRP4beta C1 domain was non-functional when inserted into either RasGRP1 or RasGRP4, implying that the alternative splicing which produces this C1 domain eliminates its contribution to membrane binding.