MTHFR 677C>T and 1298A>C polymorphisms and male infertility risk: a meta-analysis

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between MTHFR 677C>T and 1298A>C polymorphisms and risk of male infertility. However, the results from the published studies on the association between these two MTHFR polymorphisms and male infertility risk are conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of association between the MTHFR polymorphisms and risk of male infertility, we performed a meta-analysis. A comprehensive search was conducted to identify all case–control studies of MTHFR polymorphisms and male infertility risk. We used odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the strength of the association. Overall, we found that both 677C>T and 1298A>C polymorphisms were not significantly associated with male infertility risk. However, in stratified analysis by ethnicity, we found that the 677C>T polymorphism was significantly associated with the risk of male infertility in Asian population (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.05–2.37, P = 0.03; TT vs. TC + CC: OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.05–1.86, P = 0.02; TT + TC vs. CC: OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01–1.77, P = 0.04). Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis suggested that the MTHFR 677T allele might be a low-penetrant risk factor for male infertility, especially in Asian population.     

Current evidences on vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility

Several polymorphisms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) such as 936 C/T, −2578 C/A, −406 C/T, and −1154 G/A polymorphism have been identified. Published data on the association between VEGF polymorphisms and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Crude OR with 95% CI was used to assess the strength of association between them. For VEGF 936C/T polymorphism, a total of 10 studies including 7,685 cases and 7,915 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between VEGF 936C/T polymorphism and breast cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (TC vs. CC: OR = 0.904, 95% CI = 0.797–1.024; TT vs. CC: OR = 0.974, 95% CI = 0.786–1.205; dominant model: OR = 0.911, 95% CI = 0.811–1.024; and recessive model: OR = 0.991, 95% CI = 0.801–1.226). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, still no significant associations were found for all comparison models. For −2578 C/A, −406 C/T, and −1154 G/A polymorphism, there were too limited data to perform a meta-analysis. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the VEGF 936C/T polymorphism may be not associated with breast cancer development. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.     

Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) Polymorphisms and Susceptibility for Cervical Lesions: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The association between the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T/A1298C polymorphisms and the susceptibility to cervical lesions was unclear. This study was designed to investigate their precise association using a large-scale meta-analysis.

Methods

The previous 16 studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase and CBM databases. The crude odds ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the association between the MTHFR C677T/A1298C polymorphisms and the susceptibility to the cervical lesions. The subgroup analyses were made on the following: pathological history, geographic region, ethnicity, source of controls and source of DNA for genotyping.

Results

Neither of the polymorphisms had a significant association with the susceptibility to the cervical lesions in all genetic models. Similar results were found in the subgroup analyses. No association was found between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and the cervical lesions in the Asia or the America populations though a significant inverse association was found in the Europe population (additive model: P = 0.006, OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.72–0.95; CT vs. CC: P = 0.05, OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.69–1.00; TT vs. CC: P = 0.05, OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.53–1.00). Interestingly, women with the MTHFR A1298C polymorphisms had a marginally increased susceptibility to invasive cancer (ICC) when compared with no carriers but no statistically significant difference in the dominant model (P = 0.06, OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.99–1.49) and AC vs. AA (P = 0.09, OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.97–1.51).

Conclusions

The MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms may not increase the susceptibility to cervical lesions. However, the meta-analysis reveals a negative association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphisms and the cervical lesions, especially in the European populations. The marginal association between the MTHFR A1298C polymorphisms and the susceptibility to cervical cancer requires a further study.     

Association of a LSP1 gene rs3817198T>C polymorphism with breast cancer risk: evidence from 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls

Published data on the association between lymphocyte-specific protein 1 (LSP1) rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis of the LSP1 gene and risk of breast cancer to obtain the most reliable estimate of the association. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the strength of the association between the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and risk of breast cancer. A total of seven eligible studies including 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls based on the search criteria were involved in this meta-analysis. The distributions of genotypes in the controls were all in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We observed that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism was significantly correlated with breast cancer risk when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04–1.08; the homozygote codominant: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01–1.28). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significant association was observed in Caucasians for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.03–1.52) and for the recessive model (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.02–1.47). There was significant association observed in Africans for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.22–0.92) and for the recessive model (OR = 0.43; 95% CI=0.22–0.88). Also, significant association was observed in mixed ethnicities for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in nested case–control studies (CC vs. TT: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). But no significant association was observed for all comparison models between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in hospital-based and people-based studies. When stratified by BRCA1 mutation carriers status, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in this meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.14; the dominant model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.18). And significant association was found in the BRCA2 mutation carriers in the allele contrast (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03–1.20), the homozygote codominant (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.04–1.47), the heterozygote codominant (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.00–1.25) and the dominant models (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03–1.27). There was significant association between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 positive cohort in all comparison models (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03–1.13; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05–1.29; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.16; the dominant model: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03–1.17; the recessive model: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01–1.23). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer but may not be in Africans.     

MTHFR polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) have been reported to alter the risk of ovarian cancer. However, the results are still inconclusive. For better understanding of the effect of these two polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. An extensive search was performed to identify all case–control studies investigating such association. The strength of association between these two polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk was assessed by odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95?% confidence interval (95?% CI). 3,496 cases and 3,631 controls for C677T polymorphism and 3,280 cases and 3,346 controls for A1298C polymorphism were included in this meta-analysis. The results suggested that there were no significant associations between C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk in overall comparisons in all genetic models (For C677T: TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.94, 95?% CI?=?0.71–1.24, P?=?0.65; CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.03, 95?% CI?=?0.93–1.14, P?=?0.57; TT/CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.01, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.16, P?=?0.87; TT vs. CC/CT: OR?=?0.93, 95?% CI?=?0.72–1.20, P?=?0.58. For A1298C: CC vs. AA: OR?=?1.05, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.25, P?=?0.65; CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.98, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.08, P?=?0.66; CC/CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.99, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.09, P?=?0.85; CC vs. AA/CA: OR?=?1.06, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.26, P?=?0.46). Subgroup analysis based on ethnicities and influence analysis did not perturb the results. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are not associated with ovarian cancer risk, especially in Caucasians.     

Combined analysis of the association between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphisms and cancer risk

P73 is a structural and functional homologue of p53, and plays an important role in regulating cell cycle and apoptosis. A potentially functional polymorphism (designated as p73 G4C14-to-A4T14) has been identified in a region in exon 2 of the p73 gene, which may theoretically form a stem-loop structure and thereby affect p73 expression. Several investigations have reported the correlation between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and cancer risk. However, the results are inconclusive. To further assess the association between p73 polymorphism and cancer risk, we performed meta-analysis of the data sets obtained from 26 individual studies involving 8,148 cancer patients and 8,150 controls. The association between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and cancer risk was determined by crude odd ratios (OR) with 95% CI (confidential interval). AT-allele carriers were found to have a significantly increased risk of cervical cancer (AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.14–2.33; AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.05–2.10), colorectal cancer (AT/AT vs. AT/GC + GC/GC, OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.25–3.12), head and neck cancer (AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.06–1.96) and other cancers (AT/AT vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.24–2.57; AT/AT vs. AT/GC + GC/GC, OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.26–2.56). In the stratified analysis of ethnicity, a significantly elevated cancer risk was found in Caucasians (AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.08–1.30; allele AT vs. allele GC, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06–1.24). No significant association of p73 polymorphism with the cancer risk of smoking was detected by stratified analysis by smoking status. Together, our data suggest that the p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 may be a risk factor of cancer especially in Caucasians.     

Association between ATM polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

To date, epidemiological studies have assessed the association between Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene polymorphisms and cancer risk, including lung cancer, breast cancer, glioma and pancreatic cancer. However, the results of these studies remain controversial. We aimed to examine the associations between two SNPs (rs664143 and rs664677) and cancer risk by conducting a meta-analysis of case–control studies. A total of 12 publications were included in this meta-analysis, 8 for rs664143 and 7 for rs664677. Overall, rs664143 heterozygote carriers turned out to be associated with cancer risk (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.02–1.36). In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, we observed that the ATM rs664143 polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.18–1.85, AA vs. GG: OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18–1.93) and rs664677 polymorphism was associated with decreased lung cancr risk and increased breast cancer risk (for lung cancer: TC vs. TT: OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.92, CC vs. TT: OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99 and for breast cancer: TC vs. TT: OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.17–1.73, CC vs. TT: OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.21–1.87). In the subgroup analysis by region, we also observed that individuals with ATM rs664143 GA or AA genotype had an obvious increased cancer risk among Asian people (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.20–1.63, AA vs. GG: OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.16–1.62). In conclusion, ATM rs664143 polymorphism was associated with cancer susceptibility. ATM rs664143 polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk. ATM rs664677 polymorphism was associated with decreased lung cancer risk as well as increased breast cancer risk.     

Association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysis

The results of studies on association between the C677T polymorphism of the 5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) are controversial. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ONFH, a meta-analysis was performed. Eight studies on MTHFR C677T association with ONFH were searched up to April 2011, and the genotype frequencies in control group were consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The effect summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Publication bias was tested by funnel plot, Egger’s regression test, and heterogeneity was assessed. Eight studies containing 778 cases and 1,162 controls were included. Heterogeneity was observed (χ ² = 18.58, P = 0.01). Under the random effects model, the common OR was 1.38 (95% CI: 0.92–2.08; P = 0.12). In the subgroup meta-analysis, there was an association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ONFH in non-Asian population for CT + TT vs. CC (OR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.21–2.43; P = 0.002; I ²  = 37.9%, P = 0.17), but not for Asian population (OR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.66–1.66; P = 0.35; I ²  = 45.4%, P = 0.16). There was heterogeneity between studies and no clear evidence of an association on a worldwide population. When stratifying for the race, this meta-analysis did not provide an evidence of confirming association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ONFH. The large sample and well-designed study based on different ethnic groups should be considered in future associated studies to clarify the association of MTHFR C677T polymorphism with ONFH susceptibility.     

Quantitative assessment of the associations between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis

Many studies have investigated the associations between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures, but the impact of MTHFR polymorphisms on fractures risk is unclear owing to the obvious inconsistence among those studies. This study aims to quantify the strength of association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures. We searched the PubMed, Embase and Wanfang databases for articles relating the association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures in humans. We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) with their confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the associations. Meta-analyses suggested MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with increased risk of any site fractures (for T vs. C, OR = 1.17, 95 % CI 1.03–1.32; for TT vs. CC, OR = 1. 31, 95 % CI 1.11–1.54; for TT vs. CT, OR = 1.22, 95 % CI 1.04–1.43; for TT vs. CT/CC, OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.13–1.51). Besides, MTHFR A1298C polymorphism was also associated with increased risk of any site fractures. Subgroup meta-analyses suggested MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with increased risk of vertebral fractures under three genetic contrast modes (for TT vs. CC, OR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.05–1.95; for TT vs. CT, OR = 1.36, 95 % CI 1.01–1.85; for TT vs. CT/CC, OR = 1.50, 95 % CI 1.17–1.91), but there was no association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of hip fractures and non-vertebral fractures (all P values were more than 0.05). Thus, individuals with homozygote genotype TT of MTHFR C677T have obviously increased risk of vertebral fractures compared those with heterozygote genotype CT or homozygote genotype CC. There is no association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of hip fractures and non-vertebral fractures.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">TGFBR1</Emphasis>*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls

Published data on the association between TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 32 studies including 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated cancer risks were associated with TGFBR1*6A in all genetic models (for allelic effect: OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.03–1.21; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.01–1.69; for 9A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.01–1.15; for dominant model: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02–1.15; for recessive model: OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.00–1.68). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, significant associations were found in breast cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.01–1.34) and ovarian cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.00–1.54; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.03–5.33). However, no significant associations were found in colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancer for all genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility, increasing the risk of breast and ovarian cancer.     

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT genotype might be associated with an increased lung cancer risk in Asians

Background

The association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C > T polymorphism and lung cancer risk has been studied in various populations with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to assess the association strength by a meta-analysis of published studies.

Methods

We searched PubMed and Chinese Biomedical (CBM) databases for relevant literatures published by July 18, 2012. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to assess the strength of the association.

Results

A total of 20 studies comprising 11,653 cases and 12,032 controls were included in the final meta-analysis. Using the random effect model, we found that MTHFR 677TT variant genotype was associated with an increased lung cancer risk (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.05–1.50, P = 0.011 for TT vs. CC; OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.03–1.37, P < 0.001 for TT vs. CC + CT; OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02–1.22, P = 0.017 for T allele vs. C allele). In the further stratified analyses, the increased lung cancer risk was found in Asian subjects (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.01–1.71, P = 0.045 for TT vs. CC; OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.00–1.38, P = 0.048 for TT vs. CC + CT). There were no evidences for obvious publication bias in the overall meta-analysis and Asian subjects.

Conclusions

MTHFR 677TT genotype might increase the susceptibility of lung cancer, especially in Asians.     

Oxidative stress mediates cardiac fibrosis by enhancing transforming growth factor-beta1 in hypertensive rats

The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T gene polymorphism has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular disease and in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the relationship between MTHFR polymorphisms and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients on hemodialysis has not been examined. The aim of this study was to assess the association of polymorphisms of MTHFR gene with homocysteine (Hcy) and intimal medial thickness (IMT) in patients on hemodialysis. We performed case-control study involving107 patients with ESRD and 103 healthy controls. Plasma Hcy was measured in all the subjects and these subjects were genotyped for three MTHFR polymorphisms (C677T, A1298C, and G1793A). We observed significantly higher Hcy levels in patients as compared to controls. The frequency of MTHFR 1298CC genotype was significantly higher in ESRD patients than in controls (21.4% vs. 2.9%); the frequency of the MTHFR C677T genotypes did not differ between groups (26.1% vs. 17.4%). Compound heterozygous MTHFR 677CT/1298AC genotypes showed maximum association with the risk of ESRD (OR: 12.8; 5%CI: 1.64–10.01, P < 0.05). Concurrent occurrence of MTHFR 677CC wild genotype with either 1298CC or 1793GA significantly increased the risk of disease (OR: 7.20; 95%CI: 2.06–2.51, P < 0.001 and OR: 7.60; 95%CI: 1.68–34.35; P < 0.05, respectively). MTHFR 1298CC genotype was associated with higher Hcy levels. IMT was also significantly higher in patients with the 1298CC genotype (P < 0.05). Thus, A1298C polymorphism of MTHFR gene appears to be associated with the severity of carotid atherosclerosis and co-occurrence of MTHFR polymorphisms may be a risk factor for CVD in patients on hemodialysis.     

Association between two genetic polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis

The widely studied candidate genes of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, angiotensinogen (AGT), and angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AGTR1), are implicated in the development of diabetic nephropathy (DN). A number of studies have evaluated the association between the functional polymorphisms, AGT M235T and AGTR1 A1166C, and DN risk with conflicting results. The present meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall risk of these polymorphisms associated with DN on 4,377 DN cases and 4,905 controls from 34 published case–control studies by searching electronic databases and reference lists of relevant articles. We examined the association between each polymorphism and the risk of DN by odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and calculated the ORs for different genetic model. In addition, stratification analysis by ethnicity and diabetes mellitus (DM) type was conducted. In this meta-analysis, we failed to find any significant main effects in both overall analysis and stratified analysis for the AGT M235T. However, the overall analysis detected a significant association between the AGTR1 A1166C and the risk of DN for the CC compared with the AA and dominant genetic model (CC vs. AA: OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.00–4.44; dominant model: OR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.06–4.23). In subgroup analysis, only patients with T2DM showed significant association for CC vs. AA model and dominant model (CC vs. AA: OR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.21–9.08; dominant model: OR = 3.50, 95% CI: 1.41–8.69). This study suggests that the AGTR1 A1166C polymorphism may contribute to DN development, particularly in T2DM patients.     

MTHFR 677 CT/MTHFR 1298 CC genotypes are associated with increased risk of hypertension in Indians

The goals of our present study were to measure plasma homocysteine levels and determine their association with methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms (C677T and A1298C) in essential hypertensive subjects. Plasma total homocysteine and folic acid levels were measured in essential hypertensive patients (n = 153) before and after oral supplementation with either 5 mg folic acid tablet/day or 5 mg placebo/day for 4 weeks and compared with age and sex matched normotensive controls (n = 133). MTHFR gene polymorphisms (C677T and A1298C) were studied by restriction fragment length polymorphism and correlated with plasma homocysteine levels. Homocysteine levels were significantly higher in hypertensive patients as compared to controls and showed a negative correlation with plasma folate levels. Folic acid supplementation (5 mg/day) for 4 weeks resulted in a significant decrease in plasma homocysteine concentrations in these patients. Patients carrying MTHFR 677T allele (OR = 1.90; 95%CI: 1.14–3.19) or MTHFR 1298C (OR = 2.6, 95%CI: 1.55–4.40) allele were at increased risk of hypertension. The frequency of co-occurrence of MTHFR 677 CT/1298 CC genotypes was significantly higher in the patients compared to controls (P < 0.05) and was associated with increased risk of hypertension (OR = 3.54, 95%CI: 0.37–4.30). Subjects with MTHFR 1298 CC genotype had significantly higher homocysteine levels compared to those with MTHFR 1298 AA genotype (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that MTHFR 677T and 1298C alleles and co-occurrence of MTHFR 677 CT/MTHFR 1298 CC genotypes are associated with increased risk of hypertension and MTHFR 1298 CC genotype is associated with higher homocysteine levels in our subjects.     

XPA A23G polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer: a meta-analysis

Xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) participates in modulating recognition of DNA damage during the DNA nucleotide excision repair process. The XPA A23G polymorphism has been investigated in case–control studies to evaluate the cancer risk attributed to the variant, but the results were conflicting. To clarify the effect of XPA A23G polymorphism in cancer risk, we conducted a meta-analysis that included 30 published case–control studies. Overall, no significant association of XPA A23G variant with cancer susceptibility was observed for any genetic model. However, significant association was observed for colorectal cancer (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.15–2.44; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.08–1.17), for breast cancer an increased but non-significant risk was found (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.98–1.66; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.99–1.63), and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in recessive model (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02–1.38), whereas for lung cancer a significant reduced risk was observed (GG vs. AA: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.66–0.90; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66–0.87), it’s noting that in Asian population the inverse association was more apparent. In addition, in Asian population for esophageal cancer a significant decreased risk was also found in dominant genetic model (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.43–0.70) and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in dominant genetic model (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.03–2.23). The meta-analysis suggested that the XPA A23G G allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development.     

Survivin promoter ?31G/C (rs9904341) polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess the association of survivin −31 G/C promoter polymorphism and cancer risk. Thirteen case–control studies identified through PubMed and published between 2007 and 2011 with a total of 3329 cancer cases and 3979 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to investigate the strength of the association. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that survivin −31C allele was associated with 1.27 fold increased risk of cancer compared with the −31G allele (95% CI = 1.091–1.479; random model). Subgroup analyses based on type of cancer and ethnicity were also performed, and results indicated that survivin −31G/C polymorphism was not associated with risk of gastric cancer [OR = 2.879; 95% CI = 0.553–15.004) for CC vs.GG] and esophageal cancer [OR = 1.352; 95% CI = 0.494–3.699) for CC vs.GG]. Stratification on the basis of ethnicity showed that the risk due to −31C allele was significant only in Asian population [OR = 1.894; 95% CI = 1.206–2.974 for CC vs.GG]. The present meta-analysis suggests an important role of survivin −31 G/C polymorphism with cancer risk especially in Asian population. However, further studies with larger sample size are required to draw more comprehensive conclusions and provide more precise evidence in individual cancers.     

CDH1 promoter polymorphism and stomach cancer susceptibility

The relationship of stomach cancer susceptibility and the presence of E-cadherin (CDH1) promoter −160 C/A polymorphism had been reported with conflicting results. To further explore the association of this polymorphism with stomach cancer susceptibility, we performed an extensive search of relevant studies and carried out a meta-analysis to obtain a more precise estimate. A total of 16 studies including 2,611 cases and 3,788 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. When all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between CDH1 −160 C/A polymorphism and stomach cancer risk (CA vs. CC: OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85–1.19; AA vs. CC: OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.75–1.46; dominant model: OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.86–1.20; recessive model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.76–1.41). When subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity, the A-allele carriers conferred a decreased stomach cancer risk in Asians (AA vs. CC: OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.96; dominant model: OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72–0.99), but no statistically significant association was found in Caucasians. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that CDH1 −160 A-allele may play a protective role of stomach cancer development in Asians but not in Caucasians.     

Meta-analysis of TYK2 gene polymorphisms association with susceptibility to autoimmune and inflammatory diseases

The aim of our meta-analysis was to quantitatively summarize the association of TYK2 gene polymorphisms with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. 11 studies that included data from 21497 cases and 22647 controls were identified. OR was used as a measure of the effect of the association in a fixed/random effect model. Meta-analysis was performed for six TYK2 gene polymorphisms (rs34536443, rs2304256, rs280523, rs280519, rs12720270 and rs12720356). Significant association was found in rs34536443 (C versus G: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.69–0.84, P < 0.00001; GC + CC versus GG: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.68–0.90, P = 0.0005; CC versus GG + GC: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.28–2.05, P = 0.58; CC versus GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.27–2.02, P = 0.56; GC versus GG: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.68–0.90, P = 0.0006) and rs2304256 (A versus C: OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70–0.87, P < 0.0001; CA + AA versus CC: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.59–0.81, P < 0.0001; AA versus CC + CA: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.66–1.00, P = 0.05; AA versus CC: OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47–0.86, P = 0.003; CA versus CC: OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.60–0.83, P < 0.0001) in TYK2 gene, but not for the other polymorphisms (rs280523, rs280519, rs12720270, and rs12720356). This meta-analysis demonstrates that autoimmune and inflammatory diseases is associated with TYK2 gene rs34536443 and rs2304256 polymorphisms, but not rs280523, rs280519, rs12720270 and rs12720356.     

Maternal Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase C677T Polymorphism and Down Syndrome Risk: A Meta-Analysis from 34 Studies

Background

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a key enzyme of folate metabolic pathway which catalyzes the irreversible conversion of 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. 5-methyltetrahydrofolate donates methyl group for the methylation of homocysteine to methionine. Several studies have investigated maternal MTHFR C677T polymorphism as a risk factor for DS, but the results were controversial and inconclusive. To come into a conclusive estimate, authors performed a meta-analysis.

Aim

A meta-analysis of published case control studies was performed to investigate the association between maternal MTHFR C677T polymorphism and Down syndrome.

Methods

PubMed, Google Scholar, Elsevier, Springer Link databases were searched to select the eligible case control studies using appropriate keywords. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95%confidence interval were calculated for risk assessment.

Results

Thirty four studies with 3,098 DS case mothers and 4,852 control mothers were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled OR was estimated under five genetic models and significant association was found between maternal MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism and Down syndrome under four genetic models except recessive model (for T vs. C, OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.09–1.46, p = 0.001; for TT vs. CC, OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.13–1.97, p = 0.008; for CT vs. CC, OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.10–1.51, p = 0.001; for TT+CT vs. CC, OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.13–1.60, p = 0.0008; for TT vs. CT+CC, OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60–0.94, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

The results of the present meta-analysis support that maternal MTHFR C677T polymorphism is a risk factor for DS- affected pregnancy.     

The Association between MTHFR Gene Polymorphisms and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk was inconsistent and underpowered. To clarify the effects of MTHFR gene polymorphisms on the risk of HCC, a meta-analysis of all available studies relating C677T and/or A1298C polymorphisms of MTHFR gene to the risk of HCC was conducted.

Methods

The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) for the period up to July 2012. Data were extracted by two independent authors and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Metaregression and subgroup analyses were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity.

Results

Finally, 12 studies with 2,351 cases and 4,091 controls were included for C677T polymorphism and 6 studies with 1,333 cases and 1,878 controls were included for A1298C polymorphism. With respect to A1298C polymorphism, significantly decreased HCC risk was found in the overall population (CC vs. AA: OR = 0.660, 95%CI 0.460–0.946, P = 0.024; recessive model: OR = 0.667, 95%CI = 0.470–0.948, P = 0.024). In subgroup analyses, significantly decreased HCC risk was found in Asian population (CC vs. AA: OR = 0.647, 95%CI = 0.435–0.963; P = 0.032) and population-based studies (CC vs. AA: OR = 0.519, 95%CI = 0.327–0.823; P = 0.005). With respect to C677T polymorphism, no significant association with HCC risk was demonstrated in overall and stratified analyses.

Conclusions

We concluded that MTHFR A1298C polymorphism may play a protective role in the carcinogenesis of HCC. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm this association.