Review of skin dose calculation software in interventional cardiology

PurposeIn interventional cardiology, patients may be exposed to high doses to the skin resulting in skin burns following single or multiple procedures. Reviewing and analysing available software (online or offline) may help medical physicists assessing the maximum skin dose to the patient together with the dose distribution during (or after) these procedures.Method and resultsCapabilities and accuracy of available software were analysed through an extensive bibliography search and contacts with both vendor and authors. Their markedly differed among developers.In total, 22 software were identified and reviewed according to their algorithms and their capabilities. Special attention was dedicated to their main features and limitations of interest for the intended clinical use.While the accuracy of the 12 software products validated with measurements on phantoms was acceptable (within ± 25%), the agreement was poor for the two products validated on patients (within ± 43% and ± 76%, respectively). In addition, no software has been validated on angiographic units from all manufacturers, though several software developers claimed vendor-independent transportability. Only one software allows for multiple procedures dose calculation.ConclusionLarge differences among vendors made it clear that work remains to be done before an accurate and reliable skin dose mapping is available for all patients.     

Feasibility of setting up generic alert levels for maximum skin dose in fluoroscopically guided procedures

PurposeThe feasibility of setting-up generic, hospital-independent dose alert levels to initiate vigilance on possible skin injuries in interventional procedures was studied for three high-dose procedures (chemoembolization (TACE) of the liver, neuro-embolization (NE) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) in 9 European countries.MethodsGafchromic® films and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used to determine the Maximum Skin Dose (MSD). Correlation of the online dose indicators (fluoroscopy time, kerma- or dose-area product (KAP or DAP) and cumulative air kerma at interventional reference point (K_a,r)) with MSD was evaluated and used to establish the alert levels corresponding to a MSD of 2 Gy and 5 Gy. The uncertainties of alert levels in terms of DAP and K_a,r, and uncertainty of MSD were calculated.ResultsAbout 20–30% of all MSD values exceeded 2 Gy while only 2–6% exceeded 5 Gy. The correlations suggest that both DAP and K_a,r can be used as a dose indicator for alert levels (Pearson correlation coefficient p mostly >0.8), while fluoroscopy time is not suitable (p mostly <0.6). Generic alert levels based on DAP (Gy cm²) were suggested for MSD of both 2 Gy and 5 Gy (for 5 Gy: TACE 750, PCI 250 and NE 400). The suggested levels are close to the lowest values published in several other studies. The uncertainty of the MSD was estimated to be around 10–15% and of hospital-specific skin dose alert levels about 20–30% (with coverage factor k = 1).ConclusionsThe generic alert levels are feasible for some cases but should be used with caution, only as the first approximation, while hospital-specific alert levels are preferred as the final approach.     

Validation of a dose tracking software for skin dose map calculation in interventional radiology

PurposeValidate the skin dose software within the radiation dose index monitoring system NEXO[DOSE]® (Bracco Injeneering S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland). It provides the skin dose distribution in interventional radiology (IR) procedures.MethodsTo determine the skin dose distribution and the Peak Skin Dose (PSD) in IR procedures, the software uses exposure and geometrical parameters taken from the radiation dose structured report and additional information specific to each angiographic system. To test the accuracy of the software, GafChromic® XR-RV3 films, wrapped under a cylindrical PMMA phantom, were irradiated with different setups. Calculations and films results are compared in terms of absolute dose and geometric accuracy, using two angiographic systems (Philips Integris Allura FD20, Siemens AXIOM-ArtisZeego).ResultsCalculated and film measured PSD values agree with an average difference of 7% ± 5%. The discrepancies in dose evaluation increase up to 33% in lower dose regions, because the algorithm does not consider the out-of-field scatter contribution of the neighboring fields, which is more significant in these areas. Regarding the geometric accuracy, the differences between the simulated dose spatial distributions and the measured ones are<3 mm (4%) in simple tests and 5 mm (5%) in setups closer to clinical practice. Moreover, similar results are obtained for the two studied angiographic system vendors.ConclusionsNEXO[DOSE]® provides an accurate skin dose distribution and PSD estimate. It will allow faster and more accurate monitoring of patient follow-up in the future.     

Conversion factors for effective dose and organ doses with the air Kerma area product in hysterosalpingography

Histerosalpingography (HSG) remains the dominant diagnostic tool for investigation of infertility in women. Conversion factors used to estimate effective (E) and organ doses (H_T) from air Kerma area product (KAP) are needed to estimate patient doses in HSG, performed with state-of-the-art fluoroscopic X-ray systems with digital detectors.In this study, estimates of E and H_T for six critical organs/tissues, were derived on an individual basis in 120 HSG procedures and in 1410 irradiation events, performed on two X-ray systems from information available through the radiation dose structured report using Monte Carlo methods.Mean values of E and H_ovaries were1.0 ± 0.9 mSv and 5.6 ± 5.4 mGy. E/KAP conversion factors of 0.13; 0.18; 0.28 and 0.35 mSv Gy⁻¹cm⁻² were established for irradiation events with a Cu filtration of 0.0; 0.1; 0.4 and 0.9 mm. A high agreement was obtained between E estimated through Monte Carlo methods and E/KAP conversion factors accounting separately for the different modes of fluoroscopy and the radiography component of HSG, with a systematic error of 0 mSv and lower/upper limits of agreement of −0.6 and 0.5 mSv. On the contrary, the use of a single coefficient of conversion did not provide accurate estimates of E, showing a bias of −0.4 mSv and lower and upper limits of agreement of −1.9 and 1.2 mSv.An algorithm for the estimation of effective and organ doses from KAP has been established in HSG procedures depending on the Cu filtration in the X-ray irradiation events.     

A retrospective comparison of organ dose and effective dose in percutaneous vertebroplasty performed under CT guidance or using a fixed C-arm with a flat-panel detector

PurposeTo compare the organ-dose and effective-dose (E) delivered to the patient during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) of one thoracic or lumbar vertebra performed under CT guidance or using a fixed C-arm.MethodsConsecutive adult patients undergoing PVP of one vertebra under CT-guidance, with optimized protocol and training of physicians, or using a fixed C-arm were retrospectively included from January 2016 to June 2017. Organ-doses were computed on 16 organs using CT Expo 2.4 software for the CT procedures and PCXMC 2.0 for the fixed C-arm procedures. E was also computed with both software. Dosimetric values per anatomic locations for all procedures were compared using the paired Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test.ResultsIn total, 73 patients were analysed (27 men and 46 women, mean age 78 ± 10 years) among whom 35 (48%) underwent PVP under CT guidance and 38 (52%) PVP using a fixed C-arm. The median E was 11.31 [6.54; 15.82] mSv for all PVPs performed under CT guidance and 5.58 [3.33; 8.71] mSv for fixed C-arm and the differences was significant (p<0.001). For lumbar PVP, the organ doses of stomach, liver and colon were significantly higher with CT-scan than with the fixed C-arm: 97% (p=0.02); 21% (p=0.099) and 375% (p=0.002), respectively. For thoracic PVP, the lung organ dose was significantly higher with CT-scan than with the fixed C-arm (127%; p<0.001) and the oesophagus organ doses were not significantly different (p = 0.626).ConclusionThis study showed that the E and the organ dose on directly exposed organs were both higher for PVP performed under CT-guidance than with the fixed C-arm.     

Characterisation of grids of point detectors in maximum skin dose measurement in fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures

PurposePoint detectors are frequently used to measure patient's maximum skin dose (MSD) in fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures (IP). However, their performance and ability to detect the actual MSD are rarely evaluated. The present study investigates the sampling uncertainty associated with the use of grids of point detectors to measure MSD in IP.MethodChemoembolisation of the liver (CE), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and neuroembolisation (NE) procedures were studied. Spatial dose distributions were measured with XR-RV3 Gafchromic^® films for 176 procedures. These distributions were used to simulate measurements performed using grids of detectors such as thermoluminescence detectors, with detector spacing from 1.4 up to 10 cm.ResultsThe sampling uncertainty was the highest in PCI and NE procedures. With 40 detectors covering the film area (36 cm × 44 cm), the maximum dose would be on average 86% and 63% of the MSD measured with Gafchromic^® films in CE and PCI procedures, respectively. In NE procedures, with 27 detectors covering the film area (14 cm × 35 cm), the maximum dose measured would be on average 82% of the MSD obtained with the Gafchromic^® films.ConclusionThermoluminescence detectors show good energy and dose response in clinical beam qualities. However the poor spatial resolution of such point-like dosimeters may far outweigh their good dosimetric properties. The uncertainty from the sampling procedure should be estimated when point detectors are used in IP because it may lead to strong underestimation of the MSD.     

Real-time estimation of surface dose based on incident air kerma in diagnostic radiology

PurposeTo estimate the surface dose in diagnostic radiology in real time based on the relationship between the incident air kerma and the surface dose.MethodsThe air kerma for 20 X-ray beams with tube voltages of 50–140 kV and a half-value layer (HVL) of 2.27–9.65 mm Al was measured using an ionization chamber. The beam quality was classified based on the quality indexes (QIs) of 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6, which are defined as the ratio of the effective energy to the maximum energy corresponding to the tube potential. The surface dose for 20 X-ray beams was evaluated based on the measured air kerma, backscatter factor, and ratio of the mass–energy absorption coefficients of water to air, which were calculated using the Monte Carlo method. Finally, the relationship between the air kerma and the surface dose was investigated for X-ray beams with the specific QI values.ResultsThe surface dose at a water phantom was represented by a linear approximation of R² > 0.98, with the air kerma, regardless of the X-ray beam quality. The surface dose estimated based on a linear approximation with the air kerma indicated an agreement within 8% with that evaluated by the chamber measurements at HVL > 3.4 mm Al.ConclusionIt is possible to estimate the surface dose in real time using the linear relationship between the incident air kerma and the surface dose regardless of the X-ray beam quality by accepting ±10% uncertainty in the surface dose estimation.     

Ultra-low dose whole-body CT for attenuation correction in a dual tracer PET/CT protocol for multiple myeloma

PurposeTo investigate within phantoms the minimum CT dose allowed for accurate attenuation correction of PET data and to quantify the effective dose reduction when a CT for this purpose is incorporated in the clinical setting.MethodsThe NEMA image quality phantom was scanned within a large parallelepiped container. Twenty-one different CT images were acquired to correct attenuation of PET raw data. Radiation dose and image quality were evaluated.Thirty-one patients with proven multiple myeloma who underwent a dual tracer PET/CT scan were retrospectively reviewed. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT included a diagnostic whole-body low dose CT (WBLDCT: 120 kV-80mAs) and ¹¹C-Methionine PET/CT included a whole-body ultra-low dose CT (WBULDCT) for attenuation correction (100 kV-40mAs). Effective dose and image quality were analysed.ResultsOnly the two lowest radiation dose conditions (80 kV-20mAs and 80 kV-10mAs) produced artifacts in CT images that degraded corrected PET images. For all the other conditions (CTDI_vol ≥ 0.43 mGy), PET contrast recovery coefficients varied less than ± 1.2%.Patients received a median dose of 6.4 mSv from diagnostic CT and 2.1 mSv from the attenuation correction CT. Despite the worse image quality of this CT, 94.8% of bone lesions were identifiable.ConclusionPhantom experiments showed that an ultra-low dose CT can be implemented in PET/CT procedures without any noticeable degradation in the attenuation corrected PET scan. The replacement of the standard CT for this ultra-low dose CT in clinical PET/CT scans involves a significant radiation dose reduction.     

Radiation dose in repeated CT guided radiofrequency ablations

ObjectiveTo calculate the cumulative effective and skin doses in patients that underwent repeated CT guided radiofrequency ablations (RFA).Materials and methodsFrom all patients that had undergone RFA during a five years period those which had three or more RFAs were selected. Using the CT images DICOM data, the dose length product (DLP), effective dose (E), skin dose profiles as well as the peak skin dose (PSD) were calculated, using appropriate methods and software developed for this purpose. For each patient, cumulative DLP and E were also calculated from the sum of the respective figures of each individual procedure. To calculate PSD, the skin dose profiles of each procedure were overlaid on the same Z-axis scale using anatomical landmarks for reference and the skin doses to each point were summed up.ResultsFive patients were studied; four had undergone 3 RFAs and one 10 RFAs. Cumulative DLP, E and PSD ranges were 5.6–22.3 Gy cm, 0.08–0.36 Sv and 0.8–3.4 Gy, respectively. Median E and PSD values per RFA were 35 mSv and 0.4 Gy, respectively. For comparison purposes it must be noted that in this CT department a routine abdomen-pelvis scan results to an E of about 10 mSv.ConclusionsPatients that undergo repeated RFAs are exposed to considerably high radiation exposure levels. When these patients are in the final stage of malignant diseases, stochastic effects may not be of major concern. However, optimization of the exposure factors and monitoring of these patients to avoid skin injuries are required.     

Efficiency of personal dosimetry methods in vascular interventional radiology

PurposeThe aim of the present study was to determine the efficiency of six methods for calculate the effective dose (E) that is received by health professionals during vascular interventional procedures.MethodsWe evaluated the efficiency of six methods that are currently used to estimate professionals’ E, based on national and international recommendations for interventional radiology. Equivalent doses on the head, neck, chest, abdomen, feet, and hands of seven professionals were monitored during 50 vascular interventional radiology procedures. Professionals’ E was calculated for each procedure according to six methods that are commonly employed internationally. To determine the best method, a more efficient E calculation method was used to determine the reference value (reference E) for comparison.ResultsThe highest equivalent dose were found for the hands (0.34 ± 0.93 mSv). The two methods that are described by Brazilian regulations overestimated E by approximately 100% and 200%. The more efficient method was the one that is recommended by the United States National Council on Radiological Protection and Measurements (NCRP). The mean and median differences of this method relative to reference E were close to 0%, and its standard deviation was the lowest among the six methods.ConclusionsThe present study showed that the most precise method was the one that is recommended by the NCRP, which uses two dosimeters (one over and one under protective aprons). The use of methods that employ at least two dosimeters are more efficient and provide better information regarding estimates of E and doses for shielded and unshielded regions.     

Monte Carlo comparison of superficial dose between flattening filter free and flattened beams

This study investigates the superficial dose from FFF beams in comparison with the conventional flattened ones using a Monte Carlo (MC) method. Published phase-space files which incorporated real geometry of a TrueBeam accelerator were used for the dose calculation in phantom and clinical cases. The photon fluence on the central axis is 3 times that of a flattened beam for a 6 MV FFF beam and 5 times for a 10 MV beam. The mean energy across the field in air at the phantom surface is 0.92–0.95 MeV for the 6 MV FFF beam and 1.18–1.30 MeV for the corresponding flattened beam. At 10 MV, the values are 1.52–1.72 and 2.15–2.87 MeV for the FFF and flattened beams, respectively. The phantom dose at the depth of 1 mm in the 6 MV FFF beam is 6% ± 2.5% (of the maximum dose) higher compared to the flattened beam for a 25 × 25 cm² field and 14.6% ± 1.9% for the 2 × 2 cm² field. For the 10 MV beam, the corresponding differences are 3.4% ± 1.5% and 10.7% ± 0.6%. The skin dose difference at selected points on the patient's surface between the plans using FFF and flattened beams in the head-and-neck case was 6.5% ± 2.3% (1SD), and for the breast case it was 6.4% ± 2.3%. The Monte Carlo simulations showed that due to the lower mean energy in the FFF beam, the clinical superficial dose is higher without the flattening filter compared to the flattened beam.     

Perturbation analysis of 4D dose distribution for scanned carbon-ion beam radiotherapy

PurposeTo evaluate the patients’ set-up error-induced perturbation effects on 4D dose distributions (4DDD) of range-adapted internal target volume-based (raITV) treatment plan using lung and liver 4DCT data sets.MethodsWe enrolled 20 patients with lung and liver cancer treated with respiratory-gated carbon-ion beam scanning therapy. PTVs were generated by adding a 2 mm range-adapted set-up margin on the raITVs. Set-up errors were simulated by shifting the beam isocenter in three translational directions of ±2 mm, ±4 mm, and ±6 mm. 4DDDs were calculated for both nominal and isocenter-shifted situations. Dose metrics of CTV dose coverage (D95) and normal tissue sparing were evaluated. Statistical significance with p < 0.01 was considered by Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultsThe CTV dose coverage was more sensitive to set-up errors for lung cases than for liver cases, and more serious in superior-inferior direction. The sufficient CTV-D95 > 98% could be achieved with set-up errors less than ±2 mm in all shift directions both for lung and liver cases. With the increase of set-up error, the CTV dose coverage decreased gradually. The clinical criterial of CTV-D95 > 95% could not be fulfilled with set-up error reached to ±4 mm for lung cases, and ±6 mm for liver cases. OAR doses did not have a significant difference with each set-up error for both lung and liver cases.ConclusionsThe range-adapted set-up margin successfully prevented dose degradation of 4DDDs in the presence of the same magnitude of set-up error for raITV-based carbon-ion beam scanning therapy.     

The effect of heart rate,vessel angulation and acquisition protocol on the estimation accuracy of calcified artery stenosis in dual energy cardiac CT: A phantom study

PurposeTo investigate the effects of heart beat rate (bpm), vessel angulation and acquisition protocol on the estimation accuracy of calcified stenosis using a dual-energy CT scanner.MethodsA thorax semi-anthropomorphic phantom coupled with a motion simulator and a vessel phantom representing a 50% coronary artery calcified stenosis, were used. Electrocardiograph (ECG)-synchronized acquisitions were performed at different bpms. Acquisitions were performed using A, B, and C single-energy and D dual-energy protocols. Protocol A was prospective ECG-triggered axial and protocols B and C were retrospective single- and two-segment reconstruction ECG-gated helical acquisitions. Protocol D was prospective ECG-triggered axial acquisition. The vessel phantom was placed at two angulations relative to z-axis. Images were reconstructed using all available kernels with iterative reconstruction. Stenosis-percentage was estimated using the CT vendor’s vessel analysis tool. Effective dose (ED) was estimated using the dose-length product method.ResultsIn protocols A, B, and C, measured Stenosis-percentage increased with bpm. Stenosis-percentage estimate ranged from 56.8% at 40 bpm to 62.6% at 100 bpm. In protocol D, Stenosis-percentage ranged from 59.3% at 40 bpm to 54.8% at 80 bpm. Stenosis-percentage was overestimated on respect to the nominal value in most kernels. The detail kernel exhibited the highest accuracy. Stenosis-percentage was not affected by the vessel angulation. ED for protocols A, B, C, and D was 2.4 mSv, 5.1 mSv, 5.5 mSv, and 2.8 mSv, respectively.ConclusionsUse of the dual-energy cardiac CT examination protocol along with the detail kernel is recommended for a more accurate assessment of Stenosis-percentage.     

Conversion factors for effective dose and organ doses with the air kerma area product in patients undergoing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and trans arterial chemoembolization

Conversion factors used to estimate effective (E) and organ doses (H_T) from air Kerma area product (KAP) are required to estimate population doses in percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and trans arterial chemoembolization (TACE) interventional procedures.In this study, E and H_T for ten critical organs/tissues, were derived in 64 PTBD and 48 TACE procedures and in 14,540 irradiation events from dosimetric, technical and geometrical information included in the radiation dose structured report using the PCXMC Monte Carlo model, and the ICRP 103 organ weighting factors. Conversion factors of: 0.13; 0.19; 0.26 and 0.32 mSv Gy⁻¹ cm⁻² were established for irradiation events characterized by a Cu filtration of 0.0; 0.1; 0.4 and 0.9 mm, respectively. While a single coefficient of conversion is not able to provide estimates of E with enough accuracy, a high agreement is obtained between E estimated through Monte Carlo methods and E estimated through E/KAP conversion factors accounting separately for the different modes of fluoroscopy and the fluorography component of the procedures.An algorithm for the estimation of effective and organ doses from KAP has been established in biliary procedures which considers the Cu filtration in the X-ray irradiation events. A similar algorithm could be easily extended to other interventional procedures and incorporated in radiation dose monitoring systems to provide dosimetric estimates automatically with enough accuracy to assess population doses.     

Skin dose in radiation treatment of the left breast: Analysis in the context of prone versus supine treatment technique

PurposeTo determine how the skin dose varies in patients receiving radiation treatment for breast cancer in the prone and supine positions.MethodsFifty patients were scanned in the prone and supine positions. A radiation treatment plan was created for the left breast using a 6-MV beam for a prescribed dose of 42.66 Gy in 16 fractions. The dose was calculated using 1- and 2.5-mm calculation grid sizes and the surface dose was compared in both techniques.ResultsThe median gantry angles relative to the skin surface at the central axis were 8 and 52 degrees for treatment in the prone and supine positions, respectively. The mean dose difference between the prone and supine techniques was statistically significant from 3- to 5-mm depth for both grid sizes. For the 1-mm calculation grid size, the doses at 3-, 4-, and 5-mm depths in the prone and supine techniques were 87.80% and 89.10% (P < 0.003), 91.92% and 94.50% (P < 0.00), and 95.30% and 98.20% (P < 0.00), respectively; for the 2.5-mm grid size, the respective doses were 87.10% and 88.59% (P < 0.00), 91.60% and 94.63% (P < 0.00), and 95.10% and 97.80% (P < 0.00), respectively.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that the prone technique facilitates a relatively lower skin dose than the supine technique. This observation is probably due to the beam angle. The beam is more perpendicular to the skin surface in the prone technique, whereas it is more tangential in the supine technique, which may deliver a higher skin dose. Thus, the dose to the skin should be evaluated in the prone technique, and if desired, the skin dose could be carefully augmented via a bolus or beam spoiler.     

A protocol for absolute dose verification of SBRT/SRS treatment plans using Gafchromic™ EBT-XD films

PurposeTo provide a practical protocol for absolute dose verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment plans, based on our clinical experience. It aims to be a concise summary of the main aspects to be considered when establishing an accurate film dosimetry system.MethodsProcedures for film calibration and conversion to dose are described for a dosimetry system composed of Gafchromic™ EBT-XD films and a flatbed document scanner. Factors that affect the film-scanner response are also reviewed and accounted for. The accuracy of the proposed methodology was assessed by taking a set of strips irradiated to known doses and its applicability is illustrated for ten SBRT/SRS treatment plans. The film response was converted to dose using red and triple channel dosimetry. The agreement between the planned and measured dose distributions was evaluated using global gamma analysis with criteria of 3%/2mm 10% threshold (TH), 2%/2mm 10% TH, and 2%/2mm 20% TH.ResultsThe differences between the expected and determined doses from the strips analysis were 0.9 ± 0.6% for the red channel and 1.1 ± 0.7% for the triple channel method. Regarding the SBRT/SRS plans verification, the mean gamma passing rates were 99.5 ± 1.0% vs 99.6 ± 1.0% (3%/2mm 10% TH), 96.9 ± 3.5% vs 99.1 ± 1.3% (2%/2mm 10% TH) and 98.4 ± 1.8% vs 98.8 ± 1.5% (2%/2mm 20% TH) for red and triple channel dosimetry, respectively.ConclusionsThe proposed protocol allows for accurate absolute dose verification of SBRT/SRS treatment plans, applying both single and triple channel methods. It may work as a guide for users that intend to implement a film dosimetry system.     

eXaSkin: A novel high-density bolus for 6MV X-rays radiotherapy

PurposeTo evaluate eXaSkin, a novel high-density bolus alternative to commercial tissue-equivalent Superflab, for 6MV photon-beam radiotherapy.Materials and methodsWe delivered a 10 × 10 cm² open field at 90° and head-and-neck clinical plan, generated with the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, to an anthropomorphic phantom in three scenarios: with no bolus on the phantom’s surface, with Superflab, and with eXaSkin. In each scenario, we measured dose to a central planning target volume (PTV) in the nasopharynx region with an ionization chamber, and we measured dose to the skin, at three different positions within the vicinity of a neck lymph node PTV, with MOSkin™, a semiconductor dosimeter. Measurements were compared against calculations with the treatment planning system (TPS).ResultsFor the static field, MOSkin results underneath the eXaSkin were in agreement with calculations to within 1.22%; for VMAT, to within 5.68%. Underneath Superflab, those values were 3.36% and 11.66%. The inferior agreement can be explained by suboptimal adherence of Superflab to the phantom’s surface as well as difficulties in accurately reproducing its placement between imaging and treatment session. In all scenarios, dose measured at the central target agreed to within 1% with calculations.ConclusionseXaSkin was shown to have superior adaptation to the phantom’s surface, producing minimal air gaps between the skin surface and bolus, allowing for accurate positioning and reproducibility of set-up conditions. eXaSkin with its high density material provides sufficient build-up to achieve full skin dose with less material thickness than Superflab.     

Variation of the prescription dose using the analytical anisotropic algorithm in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

PurposeThe aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the dosimetric variation regarding the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) relative to other algorithms in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We conducted a multi-institutional study involving six institutions using a secondary check program and compared the AAA to the Acuros XB (AXB) in two institutions.MethodsAll lung SBRT plans (128 patients) were generated using the AAA, pencil beam convolution with the Batho (PBC-B) and adaptive convolve (AC). All institutions used the same secondary check program (simple MU analysis [SMU]) implemented by a Clarkson-based dose calculation algorithm. Measurement was performed in a heterogeneous phantom to compare doses using the three different algorithms and the SMU for the measurements. A retrospective analysis was performed to compute the confidence limit (CL; mean ± 2SD) for the dose deviation between the AAA, PBC, AC and SMU. The variations between the AAA and AXB were evaluated in two institutions, then the CL was acquired.ResultsIn comparing the measurements, the AAA showed the largest systematic dose error (3%). In calculation comparisons, the CLs of the dose deviation were 8.7 ± 9.9% (AAA), 4.2 ± 3.9% (PBC-B) and 5.7 ± 4.9% (AC). The CLs of the dose deviation between the AXB and the AAA were 1.8 ± 1.5% and −0.1 ± 4.4%, respectively, in the two institutions.ConclusionsThe CL of the AAA showed much larger variation than the other algorithms. Relative to the AXB, larger systematic and random deviations still appeared. Thus, care should be taken in the use of AAA for lung SBRT.