MCM-GINS and MCM-MCM interactions in vivo visualised by bimolecular fluorescence complementation in fission yeast

Background  

Each of the three individual components of the CMG complex (Cdc45, MCM and GINS) is essential for chromosomal DNA replication in eukaryotic cells, both for the initiation of replication at origins and also for normal replication fork progression. The MCM complex is a DNA helicase that most likely functions as the catalytic core of the replicative helicase, unwinding the parental duplex DNA ahead of the moving replication fork, whereas Cdc45 and the GINS complex are believed to act as accessory factors for MCM.     

High-temperature single-molecule kinetic analysis of thermophilic archaeal MCM helicases

The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex is the replicative helicase responsible for unwinding DNA during archaeal and eukaryal genome replication. To mimic long helicase events in the cell, a high-temperature single-molecule assay was designed to quantitatively measure long-range DNA unwinding of individual DNA helicases from the archaeons Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus (Mth) and Thermococcus sp. 9°N (9°N). Mth encodes a single MCM homolog while 9°N encodes three helicases. 9°N MCM3, the proposed replicative helicase, unwinds DNA at a faster rate compared to 9°N MCM2 and to Mth MCM. However, all three MCM proteins have similar processivities. The implications of these observations for DNA replication in archaea and the differences and similarities among helicases from different microorganisms are discussed. Development of the high-temperature single-molecule assay establishes a system to comprehensively study thermophilic replisomes and evolutionary links between archaeal, eukaryal, and bacterial replication systems.     

Interactions between the archaeal Cdc6 and MCM proteins modulate their biochemical properties

The origin recognition complex, Cdc6 and the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex play essential roles in the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication. Homologs of these proteins may play similar roles in archaeal replication initiation. While the interactions among the eukaryotic initiation proteins are well documented, the protein–protein interactions between the archaeal proteins have not yet been determined. Here, an extensive structural and functional analysis of the interactions between the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus MCM and the two Cdc6 proteins (Cdc6-1 and -2) identified in the organism is described. The main contact between Cdc6 and MCM occurs via the N-terminal portion of the MCM protein. It was found that Cdc6–MCM interaction, but not Cdc6–DNA binding, plays the predominant role in regulating MCM helicase activity. In addition, the data showed that the interactions with MCM modulate the autophosphorylation of Cdc6-1 and -2. The results also suggest that MCM and DNA may compete for Cdc6-1 protein binding. The implications of these observations for the initiation of archaeal DNA replication are discussed.     

Ancient diversification of eukaryotic MCM DNA replication proteins

Background  

Yeast and animal cells require six mini-chromosome maintenance proteins (Mcm2-7) for pre-replication complex formation, DNA replication initiation and DNA synthesis. These six individual MCM proteins form distinct heterogeneous subunits within a hexamer which is believed to form the replicative helicase and which associates with the essential but non-homologous Mcm10 protein during DNA replication. In contrast Archaea generally only possess one MCM homologue which forms a homohexameric MCM helicase. In some eukaryotes Mcm8 and Mcm9 paralogues also appear to be involved in DNA replication although their exact roles are unclear.     

Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Dynamic Interactions of the Minichromosome Maintenance Complex (MCM) in the Cellular Response to Etoposide Induced DNA Damage

The minichromosome maintenance complex (MCM) proteins are required for processive DNA replication and are a target of S-phase checkpoints. The eukaryotic MCM complex consists of six proteins (MCM2–7) that form a heterohexameric ring with DNA helicase activity, which is loaded on chromatin to form the pre-replication complex. Upon entry in S phase, the helicase is activated and opens the DNA duplex to recruit DNA polymerases at the replication fork. The MCM complex thus plays a crucial role during DNA replication, but recent work suggests that MCM proteins could also be involved in DNA repair. Here, we employed a combination of stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based quantitative proteomics with immunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein-tagged fusion proteins to identify proteins interacting with the MCM complex, and quantify changes in interactions in response to DNA damage. Interestingly, the MCM complex showed very dynamic changes in interaction with proteins such as Importin7, the histone chaperone ASF1, and the Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 3 (CHD3) following DNA damage. These changes in interactions were accompanied by an increase in phosphorylation and ubiquitination on specific sites on the MCM proteins and an increase in the co-localization of the MCM complex with γ-H2AX, confirming the recruitment of these proteins to sites of DNA damage. In summary, our data indicate that the MCM proteins is involved in chromatin remodeling in response to DNA damage.DNA replication during the S phase necessitates that the entire genome be duplicated with the minimum of errors. Thousands of replication forks are involved in this process and they must be coordinated to ensure that every section of DNA is only replicated once. Errors in DNA replication are likely to be a major cause of the genetic instability that can lead to cancer (1). Cells are able to prevent duplicate replication of DNA by having a distinct stage that occurs during the G1 phase when replication origins are “licensed” for replication, a process that involves the preloading of several proteins involved in DNA replication (2). As DNA is replicated at each origin, these proteins are removed, thereby ensuring that each origin fires only once during each S phase. DNA damage response kinases activated by the stalled forks prevent the replication machinery from being activated in new chromosome domains, indicating a tight relationship between the DNA damage response and the DNA replication pathways (3, 4).The first step of the replication licensing mechanism is the loading of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM)¹ proteins on to replication origins along with origin recognition complex proteins, Cdt6 and Cdt1 (5). The eukaryotic MCM complex consists of six paralogs that form a heterohexameric ring. All eukaryotic organisms possess six homologous proteins (MCM2-MCM7) that form a heterohexameric ring that belong to the family of AAA+ (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) proteins and share similarities to other hexameric helicases (6). Even though additional MCM proteins have been identified in higher eukaryotes, the MCM2-MCM7 complex remains the prime candidate for the role of replicative helicase (7). MCM2–7 is required for both initiation and elongation of DNA replication, with its regulation at each stage being an essential player of eukaryotic DNA replication (8). As a critical mechanism to ensure only a single round of DNA replication, the loading of additional MCM2–7 complexes onto origins of replication is inactivated by redundant mechanisms after passage into S phase (9).The MCM complex plays a crucial role in determining the replication potential of cells, but recent work suggests that MCM proteins are not only targets of the S-phase checkpoints, but they also interact directly with components of the checkpoint and repair pathways (10, 11). In yeast, temperature sensitive MCM cells at restrictive temperature contain numerous foci recognized by the phosphorylated histone H2AX antibody (12), suggesting a role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Although, in principle, only two DNA helicase activities are required to establish a bidirectional replication fork from each origin, a relatively large excess of MCM complexes are loaded at origins of replication and distributed along the chromatin (13). Their function is not well understood, and most of them are displaced from the DNA during S-phase, apparently without having played an active role in DNA replication. The “MCM paradox” refers to the fact that, at least in yeast, Xenopus, Drosophila, and mammalian cells, it is possible to reduce the concentration of MCM proteins by more than 90% without impairing DNA replication (14–18) and also refers to the observation that the majority of MCM complexes do not localize to the sites of DNA synthesis in mammalian cells, further suggesting a potential role for the MCM proteins beyond DNA replication.Using a combination of stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)–based quantitative proteomics (19) with immunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged fusion proteins (20), we identified differences in protein binding partners with the MCM complex following DNA damage. Stable cell lines expressing GFP-tagged MCM2 and MCM5 were used in immunoprecipitation experiments from cells that were either mock treated, or treated with Etoposide for 15, 60, and 240 min. Etoposide is an antitumor drug that stabilizes a covalent complex between the DNA topoisomerase II and DNA by interfering with the cleavage-ligation reaction of the topoisomerase (21). This revealed specific interaction between the MCM complex and several proteins such as Nucleophosmin, BAG2, UPP1, and HDAC10. Interestingly, the MCM complex showed dynamic changes in interaction with Importin7 and the histone chaperone ASF1, and a decrease in interaction with the Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 3 (CHD3) resulting from the treatment with etoposide. This increase in interaction with ASF1 was followed by an enrichment of histone proteins, suggesting a novel role for the MCM proteins in histone deposition on chromatin following DNA damage.     

Inhibition of unwinding and ATPase activities of pea MCM6 DNA helicase by actinomycin and nogalamycin

Pea mini-chromosome maintenance 6 (MCM6) single subunit (93 kDa) forms homohexamer (560 kDa) and contains an ATP-dependent and replication fork stimulated 3′ to 5′ DNA unwinding activity along with intrinsic DNA-dependent ATPase and ATP-binding activities¹ (Plant Mol Biol 2010; DOI: 10.1007/s11103-010-9675-7). Here, we have determined the effect of various DNA-binding agents, such as actinomycin, nogalamycin, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, distamycin, camptothecin, cyclophosphamide, ellipticine, VP-16, novobiocin, netropsin, cisplatin, mitoxantrone and genistein on the DNA unwinding and ATPase activities of the pea MCM6 DNA helicase. The results show that actinomycin and nogalamycin inhibited the DNA helicase (apparent Ki values of 10 and 1 µM, respectively) and ATPase (apparent Ki values of 100 and 17 µM, respectively) activities. Although, daunorubicin and doxorubicin also inhibited the DNA helicase activity of pea MCM6, but with less efficiency; however, these could not inhibit the ATPase activity. These results suggest that the intercalation of the inhibitors into duplex DNA generates a complex that impedes translocation of MCM6, resulting in the inhibitions of the activities. This study could be useful in our better understanding of the mechanism of plant nuclear DNA helicase unwinding.Key words: ATPase, actinomycin, DNA-binding agents, DNA helicase, nogalamycin, pea MCM6     

A Dominantly Acting Murine Allele of Mcm4 Causes Chromosomal Abnormalities and Promotes Tumorigenesis

Here we report the isolation of a murine model for heritable T cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL) called Spontaneous dominant leukemia (Sdl). Sdl heterozygous mice develop disease with a short latency and high penetrance, while mice homozygous for the mutation die early during embryonic development. Sdl mice exhibit an increase in the frequency of micronucleated reticulocytes, and T-ALLs from Sdl mice harbor small amplifications and deletions, including activating deletions at the Notch1 locus. Using exome sequencing it was determined that Sdl mice harbor a spontaneously acquired mutation in Mcm4 (Mcm4^D573H). MCM4 is part of the heterohexameric complex of MCM2–7 that is important for licensing of DNA origins prior to S phase and also serves as the core of the replicative helicase that unwinds DNA at replication forks. Previous studies in murine models have discovered that genetic reductions of MCM complex levels promote tumor formation by causing genomic instability. However, Sdl mice possess normal levels of Mcms, and there is no evidence for loss-of-heterozygosity at the Mcm4 locus in Sdl leukemias. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae indicate that the Sdl mutation produces a biologically inactive helicase. Together, these data support a model in which chromosomal abnormalities in Sdl mice result from the ability of MCM4^D573H to incorporate into MCM complexes and render them inactive. Our studies indicate that dominantly acting alleles of MCMs can be compatible with viability but have dramatic oncogenic consequences by causing chromosomal abnormalities.     

The Fission Yeast Minichromosome Maintenance (MCM)-binding Protein (MCM-BP), Mcb1, Regulates MCM Function during Prereplicative Complex Formation in DNA Replication

The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex is a replicative helicase, which is essential for chromosome DNA replication. In recent years, the identification of a novel MCM-binding protein (MCM-BP) in most eukaryotes has led to numerous studies investigating its function and its relationship to the MCM complex. However, the mechanisms by which MCM-BP functions and associates with MCM complexes are not well understood; in addition, the functional role of MCM-BP remains controversial and may vary between model organisms. The present study aims to elucidate the nature and biological function of the MCM-BP ortholog, Mcb1, in fission yeast. The Mcb1 protein continuously interacts with MCM proteins during the cell cycle in vivo and can interact with any individual MCM subunit in vitro. To understand the detailed characteristics of mcb1⁺, two temperature-sensitive mcb1 gene mutants (mcb1^ts) were isolated. Extensive genetic analysis showed that the mcb1^ts mutants were suppressed by a mcm5⁺ multicopy plasmid and displayed synthetic defects with many S-phase-related gene mutants. Moreover, cyclin-dependent kinase modulation by Cig2 repression or Rum1 overproduction suppressed the mcb1^ts mutants, suggesting the involvement of Mcb1 in pre-RC formation during DNA replication. These data are consistent with the observation that Mcm7 loading onto replication origins is reduced and S-phase progression is delayed in mcb1^ts mutants. Furthermore, the mcb1^ts mutation led to the redistribution of MCM subunits to the cytoplasm, and this redistribution was dependent on an active nuclear export system. These results strongly suggest that Mcb1 promotes efficient pre-RC formation during DNA replication by regulating the MCM complex.     

Recruitment of Mcm10 to Sites of Replication Initiation Requires Direct Binding to the Minichromosome Maintenance (MCM) Complex

Mcm10 is required for the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication and contributes in some unknown way to the activation of the Cdc45-MCM-GINS (CMG) helicase. How Mcm10 is localized to sites of replication initiation is unclear, as current models indicate that direct binding to minichromosome maintenance (MCM) plays a role, but the details and functional importance of this interaction have not been determined. Here, we show that purified Mcm10 can bind both DNA-bound double hexamers and soluble single hexamers of MCM. The binding of Mcm10 to MCM requires the Mcm10 C terminus. Moreover, the binding site for Mcm10 on MCM includes the Mcm2 and Mcm6 subunits and overlaps that for the loading factor Cdt1. Whether Mcm10 recruitment to replication origins depends on CMG helicase assembly has been unclear. We show that Mcm10 recruitment occurs via two modes: low affinity recruitment in the absence of CMG assembly (“G₁-like”) and high affinity recruitment when CMG assembly takes place (“S-phase-like”). Mcm10 that cannot bind directly to MCM is defective in both modes of recruitment and is unable to support DNA replication. These findings indicate that Mcm10 is localized to replication initiation sites by directly binding MCM through the Mcm10 C terminus.     

Alternative Mechanisms for Coordinating Polymerase α and MCM Helicase

Functional coordination between DNA replication helicases and DNA polymerases at replication forks, achieved through physical linkages, has been demonstrated in prokaryotes but not in eukaryotes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we showed that mutations that compromise the activity of the MCM helicase enhance the physical stability of DNA polymerase α in the absence of their presumed linker, Mcm10. Mcm10 is an essential DNA replication protein implicated in the stable assembly of the replisome by virtue of its interaction with the MCM2-7 helicase and Polα. Dominant mcm2 suppressors of mcm10 mutants restore viability by restoring the stability of Polα without restoring the stability of Mcm10, in a Mec1-dependent manner. In this process, the single-stranded DNA accumulation observed in the mcm10 mutant is suppressed. The activities of key checkpoint regulators known to be important for replication fork stabilization contribute to the efficiency of suppression. These results suggest that Mcm10 plays two important roles as a linker of the MCM helicase and Polα at the elongating replication fork—first, to coordinate the activities of these two molecular motors, and second, to ensure their physical stability and the integrity of the replication fork.The key players of the replication machinery are the DNA polymerases that synthesize the leading and lagging daughter strands and the replicative helicase that unwinds the parental strands ahead of the polymerases. Coordination between the helicase and the polymerases is critical during replication. Uncoupling of these two molecular machines, especially during lagging strand synthesis, may result in an unrestrained helicase and the exposure of extensive single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), as observed in checkpoint mutants treated with hydroxyurea (HU) (37). Although there is no direct evidence, the implication is that the replicative helicase would be moving at a faster pace than would the DNA polymerase if synchrony were destroyed. In Escherichia coli, the replicative helicase (DnaB) and the primase (DnaG) are coupled by direct contact to form a tight complex (3). In T7, processivity of the gp5 polymerase in lagging strand synthesis requires coupling to the gp4 helicase (16). Recent studies of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggest that Mrc1 may couple DNA polymerase ɛ and the MCM helicase on the leading strand as well as activate the checkpoint response under replication stress (1, 22, 28). A candidate for coupling DNA polymerase α primase and the MCM helicase on the lagging strand is Mcm10, because Mcm10 interacts with subunits of the Mcm2-7 helicase (26, 29) as well as Polα (14, 33) and the stability of Polα requires Mcm10 in both budding yeast and human cells (8, 33). Mcm10 is an essential protein known to be involved in various aspects of the replication process. It is required during both initiation and elongation steps of DNA replication and interacts with a wide range of replication factors, such as ORC (17, 23, 29), MCM helicase, DNA polymerases ɛ and δ (23), Cdc45 (34), and Polα (33). Therefore, Mcm10 is important for the overall stability of the elongation complex, but its essential function remains unknown.Accumulating evidence suggests that the major function of many checkpoint proteins is the stabilization of the replication machinery at the fork (9, 22, 39), in addition to regulation of the temporal and spatial firing of origins and prevention of premature mitosis (31, 35, 39). The main signal that leads to checkpoint activation is believed to be the exposure of RPA-coated ssDNA (42). In Xenopus, ssDNA exposure has been shown to be mediated by a functional uncoupling between the polymerase and the helicase (7), and it has been shown that the level of checkpoint activation depended on the extent of ssDNA accumulation. This observation suggests that uncoupling of the polymerase and the helicase activity would result in ssDNA accumulation that in turn would activate the checkpoint pathway to stabilize the fork.In our study, we carried out a random and a gene-targeted mutagenesis screen to identify mutations that suppress the conditional lethality of mcm10 caused by the lability of Mcm10 in budding yeast (27). We found suppressor mutations in MCM2, which encodes one of the six distinct subunits of the MCM helicase. These mcm2 mutations correct the fork defects of mcm10, particularly that which leads to Polα instability. The altered helicase activity and activation of the checkpoint pathway of the mcm2 mutants appeared to be required for viability of mcm10 mcm2. We showed that uncoupling the MCM helicase and DNA polymerase α by destabilizing Mcm10 leads to accumulation of ssDNA, which is suppressed by reducing the MCM helicase activity. Our findings suggest that the physical coupling of Polα and the helicase by Mcm10 may be replaced by an alternative stabilization mechanism that involves slowing down the helicase and activating the checkpoint proteins.     

Is the MCM2-7 complex the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase?

The MCM2-7 complex is essential for both the initiation and elongation phases of eukaryotic chromosome replication. There is some evidence that MCM2-7 proteins may act as a DNA helicase; at the same time, a variety of other DNA helicases have also been implicated in the replication of eukaryotic chromosomes.     

Steric exclusion and wrapping of the excluded DNA strand occurs along discrete external binding paths during MCM helicase unwinding

The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase complex is essential for the initiation and elongation of DNA replication in both the eukaryotic and archaeal domains. The archaeal homohexameric MCM helicase from Sulfolobus solfataricus serves as a model for understanding mechanisms of DNA unwinding. In this report, the displaced 5'-tail is shown to provide stability to the MCM complex on DNA and contribute to unwinding. Mutations in a positively charged patch on the exterior surface of the MCM hexamer destabilize this interaction, alter the path of the displaced 5'-tail DNA and reduce unwinding. DNA footprinting and single-molecule fluorescence experiments support a previously unrecognized wrapping of the 5'-tail. This mode of hexameric helicase DNA unwinding is termed the steric exclusion and wrapping (SEW) model, where the 3'-tail is encircled by the helicase while the displaced 5'-tail wraps around defined paths on the exterior of the helicase. The novel wrapping mechanism stabilizes the MCM complex in a positive unwinding mode, protects the displaced single-stranded DNA tail and prevents reannealing.     

Coupling of DNA binding and helicase activity is mediated by a conserved loop in the MCM protein

Minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicases are the presumptive replicative helicases, thought to separate the two strands of chromosomal DNA during replication. In archaea, the catalytic activity resides within the C-terminal region of the MCM protein. In Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus the N-terminal portion of the protein was shown to be involved in protein multimerization and binding to single and double stranded DNA. MCM homologues from many archaeal species have highly conserved predicted amino acid similarity in a loop located between β7 and β8 in the N-terminal part of the molecule. This high degree of conservation suggests a functional role for the loop. Mutational analysis and biochemical characterization of the conserved residues suggest that the loop participates in communication between the N-terminal portion of the helicase and the C-terminal catalytic domain. Since similar residues are also conserved in the eukaryotic MCM proteins, the data presented here suggest a similar coupling between the N-terminal and catalytic domain of the eukaryotic enzyme.     

A requirement for MCM7 and Cdc45 in chromosome unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication

In vertebrates, MCM2-7 and Cdc45 are required for DNA replication initiation, but it is unknown whether they are also required for elongation, as in yeast. Moreover, although MCM2-7 is a prime candidate for the eukaryotic replicative DNA helicase, a demonstration that MCM2-7 unwinds DNA during replication is lacking. Here, we use Xenopus egg extracts to investigate the roles of MCM7 and Cdc45 in DNA replication. A fragment of the retinoblastoma protein, Rb(1-400), was used to neutralize MCM7, and antibodies were used to neutralize Cdc45. When added immediately after origin unwinding, or after significant DNA synthesis, both inhibitors blocked further DNA replication, indicating that MCM7 and Cdc45 are required throughout replication elongation in vertebrates. We next exploited the fact that inhibition of DNA polymerase by aphidicolin causes extensive chromosome unwinding, likely due to uncoupling of the replicative DNA helicase. Strikingly, Rb(1-400) and Cdc45 antibodies both abolished unwinding by the uncoupled helicase. These results provide new support for the model that MCM2-7 is the replicative DNA helicase, and they indicate that Cdc45 functions as a helicase co-factor.     

The 1.8-Å Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of an Archaeal MCM as a Right-Handed Filament

Mini-chromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins are the replicative helicase necessary for DNA replication in both eukarya and archaea. Most of archaea only have one MCM gene. Here, we report a 1.8-Å crystal structure of the N-terminal MCM from the archaeon Thermoplasma acidophilum (tapMCM). In the structure, the MCM N-terminus forms a right-handed filament that contains six subunits in each turn, with a diameter of 25 Å of the central channel opening. The inner surface is highly positively charged, indicating DNA binding. This filament structure with six subunits per turn may also suggests a potential role for an open-ring structure for hexameric MCM and dynamic conformational changes in initiation and elongation stages of DNA replication.     

The fission yeast pfh1(+) gene encodes an essential 5' to 3' DNA helicase required for the completion of S-phase

The Cdc24 protein plays an essential role in chromosomal DNA replication in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, most likely via its direct interaction with Dna2, a conserved endonuclease–helicase protein required for Okazaki fragment processing. To gain insights into Cdc24 function, we isolated cold-sensitive chromosomal suppressors of the temperature-sensitive cdc24-M38 allele. One of the complementation groups of such suppressors defined a novel gene, pfh1⁺, encoding an 805 amino acid nuclear protein highly homologous to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1p and Rrm3p DNA helicase family proteins. The purified Pfh1 protein displayed single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase activity as well as 5′ to 3′ DNA helicase activity in vitro. Reverse genetic analysis in S.pombe showed that helicase activity was essential for the function of the Pfh1 protein in vivo. Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells carrying the cold-sensitive pfh1-R20 allele underwent cell cycle arrest in late S/G2-phase of the cell cycle when shifted to the restrictive temperature. This arrest was dependent upon the presence of a functional late S/G2 DNA damage checkpoint, suggesting that Pfh1 is required for the comple tion of DNA replication. Furthermore, at their permissive temperature pfh1-R20 cells were highly sensitive to the DNA-alkylating agent methyl methanesulphonate, implying a further role for Pfh1 in the repair of DNA damage.     

Differences in the single-stranded DNA binding activities of MCM2-7 and MCM467: MCM2 and MCM5 define a slow ATP-dependent step

The MCM2-7 complex, a hexamer containing six distinct and essential subunits, is postulated to be the eukaryotic replicative DNA helicase. Although all six subunits function at the replication fork, only a specific subcomplex consisting of the MCM4, 6, and 7 subunits (MCM467) and not the MCM2-7 complex exhibits DNA helicase activity in vitro. To understand why MCM2-7 lacks helicase activity and to address the possible function of the MCM2, 3, and 5 subunits, we have compared the biochemical properties of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MCM2-7 and MCM467 complexes. We demonstrate that both complexes are toroidal and possess a similar ATP-dependent single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding activity, indicating that the lack of helicase activity by MCM2-7 is not due to ineffective ssDNA binding. We identify two important differences between them. MCM467 binds dsDNA better than MCM2-7. In addition, we find that the rate of MCM2-7/ssDNA association is slow compared with MCM467; the association rate can be dramatically increased either by preincubation with ATP or by inclusion of mutations that ablate the MCM2/5 active site. We propose that the DNA binding differences between MCM2-7 and MCM467 correspond to a conformational change at the MCM2/5 active site with putative regulatory significance.     

Complete in vitro reconstitution of adeno-associated virus DNA replication requires the minichromosome maintenance complex proteins

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) replicates its DNA exclusively by a leading-strand DNA replication mechanism and requires coinfection with a helper virus, such as adenovirus, to achieve a productive infection. In previous work, we described an in vitro AAV replication assay that required the AAV terminal repeats (the origins for DNA replication), the AAV Rep protein (the origin binding protein), and an adenovirus-infected crude extract. Fractionation of these crude extracts identified replication factor C (RFC), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and polymerase δ as cellular enzymes that were essential for AAV DNA replication in vitro. Here we identify the remaining factor that is necessary as the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex, a cellular helicase complex that is believed to be the replicative helicase for eukaryotic chromosomes. Thus, polymerase δ, RFC, PCNA, and the MCM complex, along with the virally encoded Rep protein, constitute the minimal protein complexes required to reconstitute efficient AAV DNA replication in vitro. Interfering RNAs targeted to MCM and polymerase δ inhibited AAV DNA replication in vivo, suggesting that one or more components of the MCM complex and polymerase δ play an essential role in AAV DNA replication in vivo as well as in vitro. Our reconstituted in vitro DNA replication system is consistent with the current genetic information about AAV DNA replication. The use of highly conserved cellular replication enzymes may explain why AAV is capable of productive infection in a wide variety of species with several different families of helper viruses.     

Protein Phosphatase 2A and Cdc7 Kinase Regulate the DNA Unwinding Element-binding Protein in Replication Initiation

The DNA unwinding element (DUE)-binding protein (DUE-B) binds to replication origins coordinately with the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and the helicase activator Cdc45 in vivo, and loads Cdc45 onto chromatin in Xenopus egg extracts. Human DUE-B also retains the aminoacyl-tRNA proofreading function of its shorter orthologs in lower organisms. Here we report that phosphorylation of the DUE-B unstructured C-terminal domain unique to higher organisms regulates DUE-B intermolecular binding. Gel filtration analyses show that unphosphorylated DUE-B forms multiple high molecular weight (HMW) complexes. Several aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and Mcm2–7 proteins were identified by mass spectrometry of the HMW complexes. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase binding is RNase A sensitive, whereas interaction with Mcm2–7 is nuclease resistant. Unphosphorylated DUE-B HMW complex formation is decreased by PP2A inhibition or direct DUE-B phosphorylation, and increased by inhibition of Cdc7. These results indicate that the state of DUE-B phosphorylation is maintained by the equilibrium between Cdc7-dependent phosphorylation and PP2A-dependent dephosphorylation, each previously shown to regulate replication initiation. Alanine mutation of the DUE-B C-terminal phosphorylation target sites increases MCM binding but blocks Cdc45 loading in vivo and inhibits cell division. In egg extracts alanine mutation of the DUE-B C-terminal phosphorylation sites blocks Cdc45 loading and inhibits DNA replication. The effects of DUE-B C-terminal phosphorylation reveal a novel S phase kinase regulatory mechanism for Cdc45 loading and MCM helicase activation.     

Chronic DNA Replication Stress Reduces Replicative Lifespan of Cells by TRP53-Dependent,microRNA-Assisted MCM2-7 Downregulation

Circumstances that compromise efficient DNA replication, such as disruptions to replication fork progression, cause a state known as DNA replication stress (RS). Whereas normally proliferating cells experience low levels of RS, excessive RS from intrinsic or extrinsic sources can trigger cell cycle arrest and senescence. Here, we report that a key driver of RS-induced senescence is active downregulation of the Minichromosome Maintenance 2–7 (MCM2-7) factors that are essential for replication origin licensing and which constitute the replicative helicase core. Proliferating cells produce high levels of MCM2-7 that enable formation of dormant origins that can be activated in response to acute, experimentally-induced RS. However, little is known about how physiological RS levels impact MCM2-7 regulation. We found that chronic exposure of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) to either genetically-encoded or environmentally-induced RS triggered gradual MCM2-7 repression, followed by inhibition of replication and senescence that could be accelerated by MCM hemizygosity. The MCM2-7 reduction in response to RS is TRP53-dependent, and involves a group of Trp53-dependent miRNAs, including the miR-34 family, that repress MCM expression in replication-stressed cells before they undergo terminal cell cycle arrest. miR-34 ablation partially rescued MCM2-7 downregulation and genomic instability in mice with endogenous RS. Together, these data demonstrate that active MCM2-7 repression is a physiologically important mechanism for RS-induced cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance on an organismal level.