Androgen-primed chemotherapy—Experimental confirmation of efficacy

A current hypothesis suggests that androgen administration prior to chemotherapy (androgen priming) may potentiate tumor cytotoxicity in prostate cancer. The Dunning R3327G rat prostatic tumor model was used to test this concept experimentally. Control groups without priming included (1) intact untreated, (2) castrate alone and (3) castrate + chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, 30 mg/kg/day for 2 days with repeat cycle in 25 days—CTX). Two experimental groups received androgens, one before and one after chemotherapy. Treatment effect was monitored by quantitating tumor volume and animal survival.

Control groups receiving castration and chemotherapy had a retardation of tumor growth and a prolongation of survival when compared to untreated animals. Androgen priming before but not after chemotherapy enhanced the degree of tumor suppression. With the androgen-priming protocol, all androgen-primed tumors had regressed, 3/6 tumors had disappeared and 3 were only palpable. At the same time point, tumors in all the other groups were actively growing and had volumes greater than the initial values (P < 0.01). Median survival was significantly prolonged in primed animals 191 vs 40 days for untreated animals and 150 days for the nonprimed castration + chemotherapy animals (P < 0.02). These findings have been repeated with several replicate experiments. These observations confirm the hypothesis that androgen priming can potentiate chemotherapy in an experimental system.     

P450-dependent enzymes as targets for prostate cancer therapy

Metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men. First line treatment is primarily aimed at blocking the synthesis and action of androgens. As primary endocrine treatment, androgen deprivation is usually achieved by orchidectomy or LHRH analogues, frequently combined with androgen receptor antagonists in order to block the residual adrenal androgens. However, nearly all the patients will eventually relapse. Available or potential second line therapies include, among others, alternative endocrine manipulations and chemotherapy.

Cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes are involved in the synthesis and/or degradation of many endogenous compounds, such as steroids and retinoic acid. Some of these enzymes represent suitable targets for the treatment of prostate cancer.

In first line therapy, inhibitors of the P450-dependent 17,20-lyase may achieve a maximal androgen ablation with a single drug treatment. Ketoconazole at high dose blocks both testicular and adrenal androgen biosynthesis but its side-effects, mainly gastric discomfort, limit its widespread use. A series of newly synthesized, more selective, steroidal 17,20-lyase inhibitors related to 17-(3-pyridyl)androsta-5,16-dien-3β-ol, may open new perspectives in this field.

In prostate cancer patients who relapse after surgical or medical castration, therapies aiming at suppressing the remaining adrenal androgen biosynthesis (ketoconazole) or producing a medical adrenalectomy (aminoglutethimide + hydrocortisone) have been used, but are becoming obsolete with the generalization of maximal androgen blockade in first line treatment. The role of inhibition of aromatase in prostate cancer therapy, which was postulated for aminoglutethimide, could not be confirmed by the use of more selective aromatase inhibitors, such as formestane.

An alternative approach is represented by liarozole fumarate (LIA), a compound that blocks the P450-dependent catabolism of retinoic acid (RA). In vitro, it enhances the antiproliferative and differentiation effects of RA in cell lines that express RA metabolism, such as F9 teratocarcinoma and MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells. In vivo, monotherapy with LIA increases RA plasma levels and, to a greater extent, endogenous tissue RA levels leading to retinoid-mimetic effects. In the rat Dunning prostate cancer models, it inhibits the growth of androgen-independent as well as androgen-dependent carcinomas relapsing after castration. Concurrently, changes in the pattern of cytokeratins characteristic of increased differentiation were observed. Early clinical trials show that LIA, in second or third line therapy in metastatic prostate cancer, induces PSA responses in about 30% of unselected patients. In some patients regression of soft tissue metastasis has been observed. In a subgroup of patients, an important relief of metastatic bone pain was also noted.     

Combination therapy with flutamide and castration (LHRH agonist or orchiectomy) in previously untreated patients with clinical stage D2 prostate cancer: today's therapy of choice

One hundred and ninety-nine patients with clinical stage D2 prostate cancer who had not received previous endocrine therapy or chemotherapy were treated with the combination therapy using the pure antiandrogen Flutamide and the LHRH agonist [D-Trp6]LHRH ethylamide for an average of 26 months (3-59 months). The objective response to the treatment was assessed according to the criteria of the U.S. NPCP. There was a 5.7-fold increase (26.3 vs 4.6%) in the percentage of patients who achieved a complete response compared with the results obtained in five recent studies limited to removal (orchiectomy) or blockade (DES or Leuprolide) of testicular androgens. Only 12 of the 186 evaluable patients (6.5%) did not show an objective positive response at the start of the combination therapy compared with an average of 18% in the same five studies using monotherapy. The duration of response was also significantly improved in the patients who received the combination therapy while the death rate was decreased by approximately two-fold during the first 4 yr of treatment. In fact, while an approximately 50% death rate is observed at 2 yr in all studies using monotherapy, the same 50% death rate is delayed by 2 yr in the present study. It should be mentioned that at the time of relapse under combination therapy, the treatment is continued and, in addition, further blockade of adrenal androgen secretion is achieved with aminoglutethimide. The marked (5.7-fold) improvement in the rate of complete objective responses coupled with the three-fold decrease in the number of non-responders, the increased duration of the positive responses and the two-fold decrease in the death rate during the first 4 yr of treatment are obtained with the combination therapy using Flutamide and castration, thus improving the quality and duration of life with no or minimal side-effects. By blocking the androgen receptors in the prostatic cancer tissue, the antiandrogen decreases the action of the androgens of adrenal origin and thus inhibits the growth of a large number of tumors which, otherwise, would continue to be stimulated by the adrenal androgens left after medical or surgical castration.     

Anemia under androgen deprivation: influence of flutamide, cyproteroneacetate and orchiectomy on the erythropoietin system.

OBJECTIVE: There is a high incidence of anemia in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC) under androgen deprivation. Pathophysiology of this anemia remains unclear. Erythropoietin (EPO) is the main growth factor inducing erythropoesis in response to hypoxia. In this study, function of the EPO-system following androgen deprivation was tested in standardized animal model. METHODS: Animals were pretreated by either orchiectomy, injection of cyproteroneacetate or flutamide. After hypoxic stimulation, EPO mRNA expression and EPO serum levels were studied. RESULTS: In all animals, EPO mRNA expression and EPO serum levels were increased following hypoxic stimulation. Compared to the control group, this increase was even more pronounced after androgen deprivation. None of the different forms of androgen deprivation had a negative stimulating effect on EPO expression. CONCLUSION: Unexpectedly, androgen deprivation did not suppress EPO mRNA expression and EPO serum concentrations. Instead, stimulation of the EPO system was even more pronounced after androgen deprivation. A deficient EPO system does not appear to contribute to the clinically observed anemia in patients treated by androgen deprivation.     

Difference in Protein Expression Profile and Chemotherapy Drugs Response of Different Progression Stages of LNCaP Sublines and Other Human Prostate Cancer Cells

Androgen ablation therapy is the primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. However, 80-90% of the patients who receive androgen ablation therapy ultimately develop recurrent tumors in 12-33 months after treatment with a median overall survival time of 1-2 years after relapse. LNCaP is a commonly used cell line established from a human lymph node metastatic lesion of prostatic adenocarcinoma. We previously established two relapsed androgen receptor (AR)-rich androgen-independent LNCaP sublines 104-R1 (androgen depleted for 12 months) and 104-R2 cells (androgen depleted for 24 months) from AR-positive androgen-dependent LNCaP 104-S cells. LNCaP 104-R1 and 104-R2 mimics the AR-positive hormone-refractory relapsed tumors in patients receiving androgen ablation therapy. Androgen treatment stimulates proliferation of 104-S cells, but causes growth inhibition and G1 cell cycle arrest in 104-R1 and 104-R2 cells. We investigated the protein expression profile difference between LNCaP 104-S vs. LNCaP 104-R1, 104-R2, PC-3, and DU-145 cells as well as examined the sensitivity of these prostate cancer cells to different chemotherapy drugs and small molecule inhibitors. Compared to 104-S cells, 104-R1 and 104-R2 cells express higher protein levels of AR, PSA, c-Myc, Skp2, BCL-2, P53, p-MDM2 S166, Rb, and p-Rb S807/811. The 104-R1 and 104-R2 cells express higher ratio of p-Akt S473/Akt, p-EGFR/EGFR, and p-Src/Src, but lower ratio of p-ERK/ERK than 104-S cells. PC-3 and DU-145 cells express higher c-Myc, Skp2, Akt, Akt1, and phospho-EGFR but less phospho-Akt and phospho-ERK. Overexpression of Skp2 increased resistance of LNCaP cells to chemotherapy drugs. Paclitaxel, androgen, and inhibitors for PI3K/Akt, EGFR, Src, or Bcl-2 seem to be potential choices for treatment of advanced prostate cancers. Our study provides rationale for targeting Akt, EGFR, Src, Bcl-2, and AR signaling as a treatment for AR-positive relapsed prostate tumors after hormone therapy.     

High-dose neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone followed by surgery in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. A multi-institutional retrospective study by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society)

BackgroundThe optimal induction treatment in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC remains undefined.AimTo compare neoadjuvant high-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) in patients with resectable, stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsRetrospective, multicentre study of 99 patients diagnosed with stage cT1-T3N2M0 NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (high-dose CRT or CHT) followed by surgery between January 2005 and December 2014.Results47 patients (47.5%) underwent CRT and 52 (52.5%) CHT, with a median follow-up of 41 months. Surgery consisted of lobectomy (87.2% and 82.7%, in the CRT and CHT groups, respectively) or pneumonectomy (12.8% vs. 17.3%). Nodal downstaging (to N1/N0) and Pathologic complete response (pCR; pT0pN0) rates were significantly higher in the CRT group (89.4% vs. 57.7% and 46.8% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p < 0.001)). Locoregional recurrence was significantly lower in the CRT group (8.5% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.047) but distant recurrence rates were similar in the two groups. Median PFS was 45 months (CHT) vs. “not reached” (CRT). Median OS was similar: 61 vs. 56 months (p = 0.803). No differences in grade ≥3 toxicity were observed. On the Cox regression analysis, advanced pT stage was associated with worse OS and PFS (p < 0.001) and persistent N2 disease (p = 0.002) was associated with worse PFS.ConclusionsCompared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, a higher proportion of patients treated with preoperative CRT achieved nodal downstaging and pCR with better locoregional control. However, there were no differences in survival. More studies are needed to know the optimal treatment of these patients.     

Combination therapy with flutamide and medical (LHRH agonist) or surgical castration in advanced prostate cancer: 7-year clinical experience

Three hundred and sixty-three patients with clinical stage D2 prostate cancer who had not received previous endocrine therapy or chemotherapy were treated with the combination therapy using the pure antiandrogen Flutamide and the LHRH agonist [ -Trp⁶,des-Gly-NH₂¹⁰]LHRH ethylamide (or orchiectomy) for an average of 771 days (24–2607 days). Only 31 of the 308 evaluable patients (10.1%) did not show an objective positive response at the start of the combination therapy compared with an average of 18% in five recent studies using monotherapy. The median survival achieved using monotherapy is approximately 24 months while, in the present study, it is increased to 41.2 months, thus giving an additional 17 months of survival with the combination therapy. It should be mentioned that at the time of relapse, combination therapy is continued and, addition, further blockade of adrenal androgen secretion is achieved with aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone. While our studies showing the advantages of combination therapy with pure antiandrogen in advanced prostate cancer have been confirmed by independent large-scale randomized studies, our preliminary data clearly suggest the interest of downstaging early stage prostate cancer by temporary combination therapy prior to radical prostatectomy.     

Androgen dependent regulation of protein kinase A subunits in prostate cancer cells

Neuroendocrine (NE) cells may play a role in prostate cancer progression. Both androgen deprivation and cAMP are well known inducers of NE differentiation (NED) in the prostate. Gene-expression profiling of LNCaP cells, incubated in androgen stripped medium, showed that the Cbeta isoform of PKA is up-regulated during NE differentiation. Furthermore, by using semi-quantitative RT-PCR and immunoblotting analysis, we observed that the Cbeta splice variants are differentially regulated during this process. Whereas the Cbeta2 splice variant is down-regulated in growth arrested LNCaP cells, the Cbeta1, Cbeta3 and Cbeta4 variants, as well as the RIIbeta subunit of PKA, are induced in NE-like LNCaP cells. The opposite effect of Cbeta expression could be mimicked by androgen stimulation, implying the Cbeta gene of PKA as a putative new target gene for the androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Moreover, to investigate expression of PKA subunits during prostate cancer progression, we did immunoblotting of several prostatic cell lines and normal and tumor tissue from prostate cancer patients. Interestingly, multiple Cbeta subunits were also observed in human prostate specimens, and the Cbeta2 variant was up-regulated in tumor cells. In conclusion, it seems that the Cbeta isoforms play different roles in proliferation and differentiation and could therefore be potential markers for prostate cancer progression.     

Optimal Sequence of Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin-Based Regimens in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Observational Study

The optimal sequence of irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear. We conducted a population-based observational study by retrospectively reviewing records from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database to explore this issue. Patients aged ≥20 years with metastatic colorectal cancer newly diagnosed between 2004 and 2008 (n = 9490) were enrolled in current study. Among these 9490 patients, 3895 patients (41.04%) did not receive any chemotherapy within the first three months after catastrophic illness registration. Patients who received best supportive care were older and had higher Charlson comorbidity indexes and incidences of comorbidities than those who received irinotecan-based regimens, oxaliplatin-based regimens, and 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine alone. Patients who received irinotecan followed by oxaliplatin-based regimens and those who received the reverse sequence were further stratified into arm A (n = 542) and arm B (n = 1156), respectively. The median first time to next treatment was not significantly different between arm A and arm B (210 days vs. 196 days; p = 0.17). However, the median second time to next treatment was longer in arm A than in arm B (155 days vs. 123 days; p = 0.006), which translated into a better overall survival (487 days vs. 454 days; p = 0.02). The crossover rate was higher in arm A than in arm B (47.84% vs. 41.61%; p<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that overall survival was comparable between the two chemotherapy sequences (p = 0.27). Our study suggested that irinotecan followed by oxaliplatin-based regimens might be a better chemotherapy treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer than the reverse sequence given the higher crossover rate and potential overall survival benefit.     

Definitive,intensity modulated tomotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost for prostate cancer patients – Long term data on toxicity and biochemical control

AimTo report long-term data regarding biochemical control and late toxicity of simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with tomotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer.BackgroundDose escalation improves cancer control after curative intended radiation therapy (RT) to patients with localized prostate cancer, without increasing toxicity, if IMRT is used.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective analysis, we evaluated long-term toxicity and biochemical control of the first 40 patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer receiving SIB-IMRT. Primary target volume (PTV) 1 including the prostate and proximal third of the seminal vesicles with safety margins was treated with 70 Gy in 35 fractions. PTV 2 containing the prostate with smaller safety margins was treated as SIB to a total dose of 76 Gy with 2.17 Gy per fraction. Toxicity was evaluated using an adapted CTCAE-Score (Version 3).ResultsMedian follow-up of living patients was 66 (20–78) months. No late genitourinary toxicity higher than grade 2 has been reported. Grade 2 genitourinary toxicity rates decreased from 58% at the end of the treatment to 10% at 60 months. Late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was also moderate, though the prescribed PTV Dose of 76 Gy was accepted at the anterior rectal wall. 74% of patients reported any GI toxicity during follow up and no toxicity rates higher than grade 2 were observed. Grade 2 side effects were reported by 13% of the patients at 60 months. 5-year freedom from biochemical failure was 95% at our last follow up.ConclusionSIB-IMRT using daily MV-CT guidance showed excellent long-term biochemical control and low toxicity rates.     

Anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy for patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor alone in recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) progressing after first or subsequent-line therapy.Methods and materialsA total of 67 patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma from our hospital were included. All patients were sorted into two arms: anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy arm and anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor arm. We retrospectively estimated objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients of both arms. Chi-square test and Kaplan–Meier methodology were used to analyze.ResultsFrom September 2018 to March 2020, this research included 67 patients. For anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy arm, partial response and stable disease were observed in fourteen and 11 patients, respectively, for an ORR of 53.8%. For anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor arm, complete response and partial response were observed in one and 5 patients, respectively, for an ORR of 14.6%. The incidence of hyperprogressive disease was higher in the anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor group compared with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy group (39.0% vs 3.8%, p<0.05). Univariable analyses discovered that 6-month PFS and OS benefits were observed for anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy arm compared to anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor arm (65.4% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.001; 100.0% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.014).ConclusionIn present study, we revealed that adding chemotherapy to anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor significantly improved 6-month PFS and OS for patients with R/M NPC progressing after first-line therapy. It warrants further study.     

Prostate cancer: Re-focusing on androgen receptor signaling

Prostate cancer is the most common, non-dermatologic cancer in men. Since prostate cancer is highly associated with increased age, the incidence of this disease is expected to increase as the population ages. In its initial stages prostate cancer depends upon the actions of androgen, and androgen deprivation therapy induces tumor regression. Currently, androgen deprivation is achieved by either surgical or chemical androgen blockade. Unfortunately, nearly all prostate cancer patients develop tumors that grow despite androgen blockade and ultimately relapse. Many alterations in prostate cancer cells contribute to this state. Although chemotherapy induces short remissions in some patients, there are no curative therapies for metastatic disease. This review summarizes our current understanding in androgen signaling and the mechanisms that allow tumor cells to bypass androgen manipulation therapy. The identification of novel survival pathways and effector molecules that drive androgen independent growth is necessary to develop effective therapies for advanced prostate cancers.     

Taxotere phase III trial on the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVES: Doxorubicin and taxanes are the most effective agents in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of Doxorubicin (A) + Docetaxel (T) (AT) and standard Doxorubicin (A) + Cyclophosphamide (C) (AC) chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results of first-line AT (50/75 mg/m2) and AC (60/600 mg/m2) D 1 q 3 wk, maximum of 8 cycles, were compared. Three Hungarian centers - Petz Aladár County Teaching Hospital, Gy?r, St.Margit Hospital, Budapest, and BAZ County Hospital, Miskolc, with 33 patients participated the international, phase III randomized TAX 306 trial. Between June, 1996 and March, 1998, 429 metastatic breast cancer patients were enrolled in the study. Eligible patients were who had not received prior chemotherapy for advanced disease, and were anthracycline-naive. Objective response rate observed in the AT arm was significantly higher than in the AC arm (ORR: 60% vs. 47%, p=0.008). Time to progression was longer in the AT group (37.1 weeks vs. 31.9 weeks, p=0.0153). Except for higher incidence of neutropenia not requiring dose modification in the AT arm, there were no major differences concerning toxicity. T did not enhance cardiac toxicity induced by A. CONCLUSION: AT results in significantly higher response rate and longer time to progression than AC in advanced breast cancer, even in patients with unfavourable prognosis.     

PSMA PET/CT to evaluate response to SBRT for prostate cancer bone metastases

BackgroundIn the current study we evaluated ⁶⁸Ga PSMA PET/ CT to measure local control of bone metastasis in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT.Materials and methodsAfter the institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of medical records of consecutive prostate cancer patients treated between 2014 and 2018 was conducted. Only medical records of patients that were treated with SBRT for bone metastasis and had pre-and post-SBRT ⁶⁸Ga PSMA PET/CT scans were included in our study. Data extracted from the medical files included patient-related (age), disease-related (Gleason score, site of metastasis), and treatment-related factors and outcomes.ResultsDuring the study period, a total of 12 patients (15 lesions) were included, with a median age of 73 years. The median follow-up was 26.5 months (range 13–45 months). Median time of ⁶⁸Ga PSMA PET/ CT follow up was 17.0 months (range 3–39 months). The median pre-treatment PSA was 2 ng/mL (range 0.56–44 ng/mL) vs. post treatment PSA nadir of 0.01 ng/mL (0.01–4.32) with a median time to nadir of 7 months (range, 2–12). Local control was 93% during the follow up period and there was correlation with PS MA avidity on PE T. None patients developed recurrences in the treated bone. None of the patients had grade 3 or more toxicities during follow-up.ConclusionsSBRT is a highly effective and safe method for treatment of prostate cancer bone metastases. More studies are required to determine if SBRT provides greater clinical benefit than standard fractionation for oligometastatic prostate cancer patients. ⁶⁸Ga PSMA PET/CT should be further investigated for delineation and follow-up.     

Major impact of hormonal therapy in localized prostate cancer--death can already be an exception

For about 50 years, androgen blockade in prostate cancer has been limited to monotherapy (surgical castration) or high doses of estrogens in patients with advanced disease and bone metastases. The discovery of medical castration with LHRH agonists has led to fundamental changes in the endocrine therapy of prostate cancer. In 1979, the first prostate cancer patient treated with an LHRH agonist received such treatment at the Laval University Medical Center. A long series of studies have clearly demonstrated that medical castration with an LHRH agonist has inhibitory effects on prostate cancer equivalent to those of surgical castration. The much higher acceptability of LHRH agonists has been essential to permit a series of studies in localized disease. Based upon the finding that the testicles and adrenals contribute approximately equal amounts of androgens in the human prostate, the combination of medical (LHRH agonist) or surgical castration associated with a pure antiandrogen (flutamide, nilutamide or bicalutamide) has led to the first demonstration of a prolongation of life in prostate cancer, namely a 10–20% decreased risk of death according to the various metaanalyses of all the studies performed in advanced disease. In analogy with the other types of advanced cancers, the success of combined androgen blockade in metastatic disease is limited by the development of resistance to treatment. To avoid the problem of resistance to treatment while taking advantage of the relative ease of diagnosis of prostate cancer at an “early” stage, the much higher acceptability of LHRH agonists has permitted a series of studies which have demonstrated a major reduction in deaths from prostate cancer ranging from 31% to 87% at 5 years of follow-up in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. Most importantly, recent data show that the addition of a pure antiandrogen to an LHRH agonist in order to block the androgens made locally in the prostate leads to a 90% long-term control or probable cure of prostate cancer.     

Androgen receptor antagonist suppresses exercise-induced hypertrophy of skeletal muscle

The physiological importance of the increase in androgen receptors in exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy was investigated in rats. Together with training rat gastrocnemius muscles by electrical stimulation every other day for 2 weeks, male rats were administered the androgen receptor antagonist, oxendolone. The androgen receptor antagonist effectively decreased the wet mass of the prostate, an androgen target organ, and did not significantly affect body mass. The increase in muscle mass induced by electrical stimulation was effectively suppressed by the androgen receptor blockade. The mean degree of muscle hypertrophy in the antagonist-treated group was significantly lower than that in the control group (102.30% vs 107.41%, respectively;P=0.006). This result suggests that the androgen pathway has a significant effect in exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy and emphasizes the importance of the increase in the number of androgen receptors in exercised muscle.     

Second line endocrine treatment of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. Preliminary endocrine results of a 5-ARM randomized phase II trial of medium vs low dose aminoglutethimide, with or without hydrocortisone vs hydrocortisone alone (EORTC 10861)

The supposed mechanism of action of aminoglutethimide (AG), medical adrenalectomy, has been challenged. AG is now considered to act as an inhibitor of the aromatization of mainly adrenal androgens to estrogens in peripheral tissues and/or breast cancer itself. To further establish the AG dose required to sufficiently reduce estrogen levels in plasma and the possible role of hydrocortisone (HC) in combination with AG or by itself, postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients received AG low (125 mg bid) or medium (250 mg bid) dose alone or combined with HC (20 mg bid) or HC alone (20 mg bid). Preliminary hormonal data show a similar reduction of serum estrone and estrone sulphate by at least some 50% at 8 wk in all treatment groups. At 6 months these effects persist except for patients treated with HC alone. In the latter a normalization of estrone levels is observed with effective suppression of adrenal androgen precursors, suggesting increased aromatase activity with prolonged glucocorticoid treatment.     

Treatment of Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer with Qi-Nourishing Essence-Replenishing Chinese Herbal Medicine Combined with Chemotherapy

Background

To evaluate the effect of qi-nourishing essence-replenishing Chinese herbal medicine combined with chemotherapy in survival of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients with essence and qi deficiency.

Methods

A prospective multi-centered randomized controlled study was conducted, and 266 advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled. 126 patients in control group received Vinorelbine plus cisplatin(NP) chemotherapy combined with symptom-oriented Chinese herbs medication(without qi-nourishing essence-replenishing herbs);140 patients in experimental group received NP chemotherapy combined with qi-nourishing essence-replenishing Chinese herbal medication(Kangliu Zengxiao Decoction and modified Feiyanning Decoction, during and after chemotherapy respectively).

Results

One patient in control and 2 in experimental group were excluded for failure to complete two cycles of chemotherapy. During follow-up, 17 and 7 patients in control and experimental group were excluded respectively(4 and 4 for taking Gefetinib after disease progression, 4 and 2 for receiving other chemotherapeutic regimens, 9 and 1 for lost to follow-up). 239 patients were included in the final analysis (131 in experimental group and 108 in control). Median overall survival in experimental group was significantly longer than control group (14.87vs.12.97 months,P?=?0.027). In experimental and control group, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 7-year, and 9-year survival rates were 57% vs. 53%, 17% vs. 8%, 10% vs. 2%, 6% vs. 0%, and 6% vs. 0%, respectively.

Conclusion

Qi-nourishing essence-replenishing Chinese herbal medicine combined with chemotherapy improves survival of advanced NSCLC patients with essence and qi deficiency.

     

Sphingosine Kinase-1 Is Central to Androgen-Regulated Prostate Cancer Growth and Survival

Background

Sphingosine kinase-1 (SphK1) is an oncogenic lipid kinase notably involved in response to anticancer therapies in prostate cancer. Androgens regulate prostate cancer cell proliferation, and androgen deprivation therapy is the standard of care in the management of patients with advanced disease. Here, we explored the role of SphK1 in the regulation of androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell growth and survival.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Short-term androgen removal induced a rapid and transient SphK1 inhibition associated with a reduced cell growth in vitro and in vivo, an event that was not observed in the hormono-insensitive PC-3 cells. Supporting the critical role of SphK1 inhibition in the rapid effect of androgen depletion, its overexpression could impair the cell growth decrease. Similarly, the addition of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) to androgen-deprived LNCaP cells re-established cell proliferation, through an androgen receptor/PI3K/Akt dependent stimulation of SphK1, and inhibition of SphK1 could markedly impede the effects of DHT. Conversely, long-term removal of androgen support in LNCaP and C4-2B cells resulted in a progressive increase in SphK1 expression and activity throughout the progression to androgen-independence state, which was characterized by the acquisition of a neuroendocrine (NE)-like cell phenotype. Importantly, inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway—by negatively impacting SphK1 activity—could prevent NE differentiation in both cell models, an event that could be mimicked by SphK1 inhibitors. Fascinatingly, the reversability of the NE phenotype by exposure to normal medium was linked with a pronounced inhibition of SphK1 activity.

Conclusions/Significance

We report the first evidence that androgen deprivation induces a differential effect on SphK1 activity in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer cell models. These results also suggest that SphK1 activation upon chronic androgen deprivation may serve as a compensatory mechanism allowing prostate cancer cells to survive in androgen-depleted environment, giving support to its inhibition as a potential therapeutic strategy to delay/prevent the transition to androgen-independent prostate cancer.     

Androgens as therapy for androgen receptor-positive castration-resistant prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed non-cutaneous tumor of men in Western countries. While surgery is often successful for organ-confined prostate cancer, androgen ablation therapy is the primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. However, this therapy is associated with several undesired side-effects, including increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Shortening the period of androgen ablation therapy may benefit prostate cancer patients. Intermittent Androgen Deprivation therapy improves quality of life, reduces toxicity and medical costs, and delays disease progression in some patients. Cell culture and xenograft studies using androgen receptor (AR)-positive castration-resistant human prostate cancers cells (LNCaP, ARCaP, and PC-3 cells over-expressing AR) suggest that androgens may suppress the growth of AR-rich prostate cancer cells. Androgens cause growth inhibition and G1 cell cycle arrest in these cells by regulating c-Myc, Skp2, and p27^Kip via AR. Higher dosages of testosterone cause greater growth inhibition of relapsed tumors. Manipulating androgen/AR signaling may therefore be a potential therapy for AR-positive advanced prostate cancer.