Separate Intramolecular Targets for Protein Kinase A Control N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Gating and Ca2+ Permeability

Protein kinase A (PKA) enhances synaptic plasticity in the central nervous system by increasing NMDA receptor current amplitude and Ca²⁺ flux in an isoform-dependent yet poorly understood manner. PKA phosphorylates multiple residues on GluN1, GluN2A, and GluN2B subunits in vivo, but the functional significance of this multiplicity is unknown. We examined gating and permeation properties of recombinant NMDA receptor isoforms and of receptors with altered C-terminal domain (CTDs) prior to and after pharmacological inhibition of PKA. We found that PKA inhibition decreased GluN1/GluN2B but not GluN1/GluN2A gating; this effect was due to slower rates for receptor activation and resensitization and was mediated exclusively by the GluN2B CTD. In contrast, PKA inhibition reduced NMDA receptor-relative Ca²⁺ permeability (P_Ca/P_Na) regardless of the GluN2 isoform and required the GluN1 CTD; this effect was due primarily to decreased unitary Ca²⁺ conductance, because neither Na⁺ conductance nor Ca²⁺-dependent block was altered substantially. Finally, we show that both the gating and permeation effects can be reproduced by changing the phosphorylation state of a single residue: GluN2B Ser-1166 and GluN1 Ser-897, respectively. We conclude that PKA effects on NMDA receptor gating and Ca²⁺ permeability rely on distinct phosphorylation sites located on the CTD of GluN2B and GluN1 subunits. This separate control of NMDA receptor properties by PKA may account for the specific effects of PKA on plasticity during synaptic development and may lead to drugs targeted to alter NMDA receptor gating or Ca²⁺ permeability.     

Regulation of NMDA receptors by the tyrosine kinase Fyn

The phosphorylation and trafficking of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are tightly regulated by the Src family tyrosine kinase Fyn, through dynamic interactions with various scaffolding proteins in the NMDA receptor complex. Fyn acts as a point of convergence for many signaling pathways that upregulate GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors. In the following review, we focus on Fyn signaling downstream of different G-protein-coupled receptors: the dopamine D1 receptor, and receptors cognate to the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. The net result of activation of each of these signaling pathways is upregulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors. The NMDA receptor is a major target of ethanol in the brain, and accumulating evidence suggests that Fyn mediates the effects of ethanol by regulating the phosphorylation of GluN2B NMDA receptor subunits. Furthermore, Fyn has been shown to regulate alcohol withdrawal and acute tolerance to ethanol through a GluN2B-dependent mechanism. In addition to its effects on NMDA receptor function, Fyn also modifies the threshold for synaptic plasticity at CA1 synapses, an effect that probably contributes to the effects of Fyn on spatial and contextual fear learning.     

The subtype of GluN2 C-terminal domain determines the response to excitotoxic insults

It is currently unclear whether the GluN2 subtype influences NMDA receptor (NMDAR) excitotoxicity. We report that the toxicity of NMDAR-mediated Ca(2+) influx is differentially controlled by the cytoplasmic C-terminal domains of GluN2B (CTD(2B)) and GluN2A (CTD(2A)). Studying the effects of acute expression of GluN2A/2B-based chimeric subunits with reciprocal exchanges of their CTDs revealed that CTD(2B) enhances NMDAR toxicity, compared to CTD(2A). Furthermore, the vulnerability of forebrain neurons in?vitro and in?vivo to NMDAR-dependent Ca(2+) influx is lowered by replacing the CTD of GluN2B with that of GluN2A by targeted exon exchange in a mouse knockin model. Mechanistically, CTD(2B) exhibits stronger physical/functional coupling to the PSD-95-nNOS pathway, which suppresses protective CREB activation. Dependence of NMDAR excitotoxicity on the GluN2 CTD subtype can be overcome by inducing high levels of NMDAR activity. Thus, the identity (2A versus 2B) of the GluN2 CTD controls the toxicity dose-response to episodes of NMDAR activity.     

Tyrosine phosphorylation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor by exogenous and postsynaptic density-associated Src-family kinases

Phosphorylation of the NMDA receptor by Src-family tyrosine kinases has been implicated in the regulation of receptor function. We have investigated the tyrosine phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunits NR2A and NR2B by exogenous Src and Fyn and compared this to phosphorylation by tyrosine kinases associated with the postsynaptic density (PSD). Phosphorylation of the receptor by exogenous Src and Fyn was dependent upon initial binding of the kinases to PSDs via their SH2-domains. Src and Fyn phosphorylated similar sites in NR2A and NR2B, tryptic peptide mapping identifying seven and five major tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides derived from NR2A and NR2B, respectively. All five tyrosine phosphorylation sites on NR2B were localized to the C-terminal, cytoplasmic domain. Phosphorylation of NR2B by endogenous PSD tyrosine kinases yielded only three tyrosine-phosphorylated tryptic peptides, two of which corresponded to Src phosphorylation sites, and one of which was novel. Phosphorylation-site specific antibodies identified NR2B Tyr1472 as a phosphorylation site for intrinsic PSD tyrosine kinases. Phosphorylation of this site was inhibited by the Src-family-specific inhibitor PP2. The results identify several potential phosphorylation sites for Src in the NMDA receptor, and indicate that not all of these sites are available for phosphorylation by kinases located within the structural framework of the PSD.     

Leptin modulates pancreatic β-cell membrane potential through Src kinase–mediated phosphorylation of NMDA receptors

The adipocyte-derived hormone leptin increases trafficking of K_ATP and Kv2.1 channels to the pancreatic β-cell surface, resulting in membrane hyperpolarization and suppression of insulin secretion. We have previously shown that this effect of leptin is mediated by the NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors (NMDARs). It does so by potentiating NMDAR activity, thus enhancing Ca²⁺ influx and the ensuing downstream signaling events that drive channel trafficking to the cell surface. However, the molecular mechanism by which leptin potentiates NMDARs in β-cells remains unknown. Here, we report that leptin augments NMDAR function via Src kinase–mediated phosphorylation of the GluN2A subunit. Leptin-induced membrane hyperpolarization diminished upon pharmacological inhibition of GluN2A but not GluN2B, indicating involvement of GluN2A-containing NMDARs. GluN2A harbors tyrosine residues that, when phosphorylated by Src family kinases, potentiate NMDAR activity. We found that leptin increases phosphorylation of Tyr-418 in Src, an indicator of kinase activation. Pharmacological inhibition of Src or overexpression of a kinase-dead Src mutant prevented the effect of leptin, whereas a Src kinase activator peptide mimicked it. Using mutant GluN2A overexpression, we show that Tyr-1292 and Tyr-1387 but not Tyr-1325 are responsible for the effect of leptin. Importantly, β-cells from db/db mice, a type 2 diabetes mouse model lacking functional leptin receptors, or from obese diabetic human donors failed to respond to leptin but hyperpolarized in response to NMDA. Our study reveals a signaling pathway wherein leptin modulates NMDARs via Src to regulate β-cell excitability and suggests NMDARs as a potential target to overcome leptin resistance.     

5-Hydroxytryptamine 5HT2C receptors form a protein complex with N-methyl-D-aspartate GluN2A subunits and activate phosphorylation of Src protein to modulate motoneuronal depolarization

N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-gated ion channels are known to play a critical role in motoneuron depolarization, but the molecular mechanisms modulating NMDA activation in the spinal cord are not well understood. This study demonstrates that activated 5HT2C receptors enhance NMDA depolarizations recorded electrophysiologically from motoneurons. Pharmacological studies indicate involvement of Src tyrosine kinase mediates 5HT2C facilitation of NMDA. RT-PCR analysis revealed edited forms of 5HT2C were present in mammalian spinal cord, indicating the availability of G-protein-independent isoforms. Spinal cord neurons treated with the 5HT2C agonist MK 212 showed increased Src(Tyr-416) phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner thus verifying that Src is activated after treatment. In addition, 5HT2C antagonists and tyrosine kinase inhibitors blocked 5HT2C-mediated Src(Tyr-416) phosphorylation and also enhanced NMDA-induced motoneuron depolarization. Co-immunoprecipitation of synaptosomal fractions showed that GluN2A, 5HT2C receptors, and Src tyrosine kinase form protein associations in synaptosomes. Moreover, immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated GluN2A and 5HT2C receptors co-localize on the processes of spinal neurons. These findings reveal that a distinct multiprotein complex links 5-hydroxytryptamine-activated intracellular signaling events with NMDA-mediated functional activity.     

Phosphorylation state-dependent interactions of hepadnavirus core protein with host factors

Dynamic phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the hepadnavirus core protein C-terminal domain (CTD) are required for multiple steps of the viral life cycle. It remains unknown how the CTD phosphorylation state may modulate core protein functions but phosphorylation state-dependent viral or host interactions may play a role. In an attempt to identify host factors that may interact differentially with the core protein depending on its CTD phosphorylation state, pulldown assays were performed using the CTD of the duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) and human hepatitis B virus (HBV) core protein, either with wild type (WT) sequences or with alanine or aspartic acid substitutions at the phosphorylation sites. Two host proteins, B23 and I2PP2A, were found to interact preferentially with the alanine-substituted CTD. Furthermore, the WT CTD became competent to interact with the host proteins upon dephosphorylation. Intriguingly, the binding site on the DHBV CTD for both B23 and I2PP2A was mapped to a region upstream of the phosphorylation sites even though B23 or I2PP2A binding to this site was clearly modulated by the phosphorylation state of the downstream and non-overlapping sequences. Together, these results demonstrate a novel mode of phosphorylation-regulated protein-protein interaction and provide new insights into virus-host interactions.     

Identification of an atypical calcium-dependent calmodulin binding site on the C-terminal domain of GluN2A

N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are calcium-permeable ion channels assembled from four subunits that each have a common membrane topology. The intracellular carboxyl terminal domain (CTD) of each subunit varies in length, is least conserved between subunits, and binds multiple intracellular proteins. We defined a region of interest in the GluN2A CTD, downstream of well-characterized membrane-proximal motifs, that shares only 29% sequence similarity with the equivalent region of GluN2B. GluN2A (amino acids 875–1029) was fused to GST and used as a bait to identify proteins from mouse brain with the potential to bind GluN2A as a function of calcium. Using mass spectrometry we identified calmodulin as a calcium-dependent GluN2A binding partner. Equilibrium fluorescence spectroscopy experiments indicate that Ca²⁺/calmodulin binds GluN2A with high affinity (5.2 ± 2.4 nM) in vitro. Direct interaction of Ca²⁺/calmodulin with GluN2A was not affected by disruption of classic sequence motifs associated with Ca²⁺/calmodulin target recognition, but was critically dependent upon Trp-1014. These findings provide new insight into the potential of Ca²⁺/calmodulin, previously considered a GluN1-binding partner, to influence NMDA receptors by direct association.     

Nucleotides and Phosphorylation Bi-directionally Modulate Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent Protein Kinase II (CaMKII) Binding to the N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Subunit GluN2B

The Ca²⁺/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and the NMDA-type glutamate receptor are key regulators of synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory. Direct binding of CaMKII to the NMDA receptor subunit GluN2B (formerly known as NR2B) (i) is induced by Ca²⁺/CaM but outlasts this initial Ca²⁺-stimulus, (ii) mediates CaMKII translocation to synapses, and (iii) regulates synaptic strength. CaMKII binds to GluN2B around S1303, the major CaMKII phosphorylation site on GluN2B. We show here that a phospho-mimetic S1303D mutation inhibited CaM-induced CaMKII binding to GluN2B in vitro, presenting a conundrum how binding can occur within cells, where high ATP concentration should promote S1303 phosphorylation. Surprisingly, addition of ATP actually enhanced the binding. Mutational analysis revealed that this positive net effect was caused by four modulatory effects of ATP, two positive (direct nucleotide binding and CaMKII T286 autophosphorylation) and two negative (GluN2B S1303 phosphorylation and CaMKII T305/6 autophosphorylation). Imaging showed positive regulation by nucleotide binding also within transfected HEK cells and neurons. In fact, nucleotide binding was a requirement for efficient CaMKII interaction with GluN2B in cells, while T286 autophosphorylation was not. Kinetic considerations support a model in which positive regulation by nucleotide binding and T286 autophosphorylation occurs faster than negative modulation by GluN2B S1303 and CaMKII T305/6 phosphorylation, allowing efficient CaMKII binding to GluN2B despite the inhibitory effects of the two slower reactions.     

C-terminal Domains of N-Methyl-d-aspartic Acid Receptor Modulate Unitary Channel Conductance and Gating

NMDA receptors (NRs) are glutamate-gated calcium-permeable channels that are essential for normal synaptic transmssion and contribute to neurodegeneration. Tetrameric proteins consist of two obligatory GluN1 (N1) and two GluN2 (N2) subunits, of which GluN2A (2A) and GluN2B (2B) are prevalent in adult brain. The intracellularly located C-terminal domains (CTDs) make a significant portion of mass of the receptors and are essential for plasticity and excitotoxicity, but their functions are incompletely defined. Recent evidence shows that truncation of the N2 CTD alters channel kinetics; however, the mechanism by which this occurs is unclear. Here we recorded activity from individual NRs lacking the CTDs of N1, 2A, or 2B and determined the gating mechanisms of these receptors. Receptors lacking the N1 CTDs had larger unitary conductance and faster deactivation kinetics, receptors lacking the 2A or 2B CTDs had longer openings and longer desensitized intervals, and the first 100 amino acids of the N2 CTD were essential for these changes. In addition, receptors lacking the CTDs of either 2A or 2B maintained isoform-specific kinetic differences and swapping CTDs between 2A and 2B had no effect on single-channel properties. Based on these results, we suggest that perturbations in the CTD can modify the NR-mediated signal in a subunit-dependent manner, in 2A these effects are most likely mediated by membrane-proximal residues, and the isoform-specific biophysical properties conferred by 2A and 2B are CTD-independent. The kinetic mechanisms we developed afford a quantitative approach to understanding how the intracellular domains of NR subunits can modulate the responses of the receptor.     

H-Ras modulates N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function via inhibition of Src tyrosine kinase activity

Tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2A and NR2B subunits of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor by Src protein-tyrosine kinases modulates receptor channel activity and is necessary for the induction of long term potentiation (LTP). Deletion of H-Ras increases both NR2 tyrosine phosphorylation and NMDA receptor-mediated hippocampal LTP. Here we investigated whether H-Ras regulates phosphorylation and function of the NMDA receptor via Src family protein-tyrosine kinases. We identified Src as a novel H-Ras binding partner. H-Ras bound to Src but not Fyn both in vitro and in brain via the Src kinase domain. Cotransfection of H-Ras and Src inhibited Src activity and decreased NR2A tyrosine phosphorylation. Treatment of rat brain slices with Tat-H-Ras depleted NR2A from the synaptic membrane, decreased endogenous Src activity and NR2A phosphorylation, and decreased the magnitude of hippocampal LTP. No change was observed for NR2B. We suggest that H-Ras negatively regulates Src phosphorylation of NR2A and retention of NR2A into the synaptic membrane leading to inhibition of NMDA receptor function. This mechanism is specific for Src and NR2A and has implications for studies in which regulation of NMDA receptor-mediated LTP is important, such as synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory and addiction.     

Directional gating of synaptic plasticity by GPCRs and their distinct downstream signalling pathways

EMBO J 31 4, 805–816 (2012); published online December202011Synaptic plasticity, the activity-dependent modification of synaptic strength, plays a fundamental role in learning and memory as well as in developmental maturation of neuronal circuitry. However, how synaptic plasticity is induced and regulated remains poorly understood. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Yang and colleagues present sets of exciting data, suggesting that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) selectively execute distinct signalling pathways to differentially regulate induction thresholds of hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), thereby governing the direction of synaptic plasticity. These results shed significant light on our current understanding of how bidirectional synaptic plasticity is regulated.Synaptic plasticity has been demonstrated at synapses in various brain regions; the most well-characterized forms are LTP and LTD at hippocampal CA1 glutamatergic synapses (Collingridge et al, 2004). In experimental models, LTP and LTD can be, respectively, induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS) and low-frequency stimulation (LFS) via activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) subtype ionotropic glutamate receptor (NMDAR). However, how HFS and LFS activate NMDARs and thereby lead to synaptic plasticity remains poorly understood and highly controversial. It is even more unclear how the bidirectional synaptic plasticity is produced and regulated in response to physiological or pathological changes.Functional NMDARs consist primarily of two GluN1 subunits and two GluN2 subunits, with GluN2A and GluN2B subunits being the most common NMDAR subunits found in the cortical and hippocampal regions of the adult brain (Cull-Candy et al, 2001). GluN2A and GluN2B subunits may confer distinct gating and pharmacological properties to NMDARs and couple them to distinct intracellular signalling machineries (Cull-Candy et al, 2001). Moreover, the ratio of these two subpopulations of NMDARs at the glutamatergic synapse is dynamically regulated in an activity-dependent manner (Bellone and Nicoll, 2007; Cho et al, 2009; Xu et al, 2009). Although controversial, GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDARs have been suggested to have differential roles in regulating the direction of synaptic plasticity (Collingridge et al, 2004; Morishita et al, 2007). Among the factors shown to regulate NMDAR function, Src family tyrosine kinases may be the best characterized, with both Src and Fyn able to upregulate NMDAR function, and thus LTP induction (Salter and Kalia, 2004). However, if these kinases modulate NMDAR function in a NMDAR subunit-specific manner remains unknown. To explore this concept, Yang et al (2012) investigated the potential subunit-specific regulation of NMDARs by Src and Fyn using whole-cell patch clamp recording of NMDAR-mediated currents from acutely dissociated CA1 hippocampal neurons or from rat hippocampal slices. They found that intracellular perfusion of recombinant Src or Fyn increased the NMDAR-mediated currents. By applying subunit-preferential antagonists of GluN2A- or GluN2B-containing NMDARs, or by using neurons obtained from GluN2A knockout mice, they discovered that Src and Fyn differentially enhanced currents gated through GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDARs, respectively.Can physiological or pathological factors differentially activate Src or Fyn, thereby exerting subunit-specific regulation of NMDAR function? To answer this question, Yang et al focused their investigation on the role of GPCRs, specifically pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide receptor (PAC1R) and dopamine D1 receptor (D1R), both of which have recently been shown to potentiate NMDARs through Src family kinases (Macdonald et al, 2005; Hu et al, 2010). Indeed, they found that activation of PAC1R specifically increased GluN2A-NMDAR-mediated currents without affecting currents gated through GluN2B-NMDARs, and this potentiation was prevented by the Src-specific inhibitory peptide Src(40–58) (Salter and Kalia, 2004). To rule out the contribution of Fyn, the authors developed a novel-specific Fyn inhibitory peptide Fyn(39–57), and demonstrated that it had little effect on PAC1R potentiation. In contrast, activation of D1R potentiated GluN2B- (but not GluN2A-) NMDAR-mediated currents, and this potentiation was specifically eliminated by Fyn(39–57), but not by Src(40–58). The authors further demonstrated that stimulation of PAC1Rs resulted in a selective activation of Src kinase and consequent tyrosine phosphorylation of the GluN2A subunit, whereas activation of D1Rs led to a specific increase in Fyn-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of the GluN2B subunit. To provide convincing evidence that these subunit-differential modulations are indeed the result of tyrosine phosphorylation of the respective NMDAR subunits, the authors then performed electrophysiological experiments using neurons from two knockin mouse lines GluN2A(Y1325F) and GluN2B(Y1472F), in which the tyrosine phosphorylation residues in native GluN2A and GluN2B subunits were, respectively, replaced with non-phosphorylatable phenylalanine residues. As expected, the authors found that PAC1R-mediated potentiation of NMDA currents was lost in neurons from GluN2A(Y1325F) mice (but maintained in neurons from GluN2B(Y1472F) mice), while D1R-mediated enhancement of NMDA currents was only observed in neurons from GluN2A(Y1325F) mice. Together, as illustrated in Figure 1, the authors have made a very convincing case that PAC1R and D1R, respectively, enhance function of GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDARs by differentially activating Src- and Fyn-mediated phosphorylation of respective NMDAR subunits.Open in a separate windowFigure 1GPCRs regulate the direction of synaptic plasticity via activating distinct signalling pathways. Synaptic NMDA receptors, both GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing, play key roles in the induction of various forms of synaptic plasticity at the hippocampal CA1 glutamatergic synapse. Under the basal level of GluN2A and GluN2B ratio, stimulation with a train of pulses at frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz produces a frequency and plasticity (LTD–LTP) curve, with maximum LTD and LTP being, respectively, induced at 1 and 100 Hz. Activation of PAC1R with its agonist PACAP38 activates Src and thereby results in tyrosine phosphorylation and consequent functional upregulation of GluN2A-containing NMDARs, resulting in an increase in the ratio of functional GluN2A and GluN2B. The increased ratio in turn causes a left shift of frequency and plasticity curve, favouring LTP induction. In contrast, activation of D1R by the receptor agonist {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SKF81297","term_id":"1156277425","term_text":"SKF81297"}}SKF81297 triggers Fyn-specific tyrosine phosphorylation and functional upregulation of GluN2B, causing a reduction of GluN2A and GluN2B ratio. This decreased ratio results in a right shift of the curve, favouring LTD induction. The ability of GPCRs to differentially activate distinct downstream signalling pathways involved in synaptic plasticity suggests the potential roles of GPCRs in governing the direction of synaptic plasticity.Given the coupling of NMDARs to the induction of synaptic plasticity, it is then reasonable to ask if activation of the two GPCRs can selectively affect the induction of LTP or LTD at CA1 synapses. Yang and colleagues investigated the effects of pharmacological activation of PAC1R and D1R on the induction of LTP and LTD by recording the field excitatory postsynaptic potentials from hippocampal slices. Consistent with differential roles of NMDAR subunits in governing directions of synaptic plasticity, the authors observed that activation of PAC1Rs reduces the induction threshold of LTP, while stimulation of D1Rs favours LTD induction (Figure 1). Facilitation of LTP by PAC1R and LTD by D1R were, respectively, prevented in the brain slices obtained from GluN2A(Y1325F) and GluN2B(Y1472F) knockin mice, supporting the differential involvements of Src-mediated GluN2A phosphorylation and Fyn-mediated GluN2B phosphorylation.Taken together, the authors'' results have demonstrated that activation of PAC1R and D1R can control the direction of synaptic plasticity at the hippocampal CA1 synapse by differentially regulating NMDAR_EPSCs in a subunit-specific fashion (Figure 1). Specifically, PAC1R enhances the function of GluN2A-containing NMDARs by increasing Src phosphorylation of GluN2A subunit at Y1325, whereas D1R upregulates GluN2B-containing NMDARs through increased Fyn phosphorylation of GluN2B at Y1472. Moreover, by regulating the ratio of functional GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDARs, PAC1R and D1R in turn modulate the direction of synaptic plasticity, favouring the production of LTP and LTD, respectively.While consistent with the recently proposed hypothesis that GluN2A and GluN2B may have preferential roles in the induction of hippocampal CA1 LTP and LTD (Collingridge et al, 2004; but see also Morishita et al, 2007), the current study further emphasizes the importance of GluN2A/GluN2B ratios in regulating LTP and LTD thresholds: increased ratio favours LTP, while reduced ratio promotes LTD. However, this seems to contradict some recent studies where the reduction and increase in the GluN2A/GluN2B ratio appeared to, respectively, favour LTP (Cho et al, 2009; Xu et al, 2009) and LTD (Xu et al, 2009). Therefore, the direction of plasticity change is likely modulated not only by the GluN2A/GluN2B ratio, but also by additional factors such as experimental conditions, developmental stages, and brain regions.Under many experimental conditions, LTP and LTD are usually induced by HFS and LFS stimulating protocols, respectively, but it remains essentially unknown how LTP and LTD are physiologically or pathologically generated in animals. To this end, the identification of different GPCRs as the endogenous upstream regulators of NMDA receptor subpopulations, and hence regulators of synaptic plasticity, is the major novelty of Yang and colleagues'' work. Future studies are needed to investigate if and how PAC1R and/or D1R are critically involved in the production of LTP or LTD in animals under physiological or pathological conditions. Given the fact that Src family kinases may be required for LTP induced by HFS in hippocampal slices (Salter and Kalia, 2004), an equally intriguing question would be whether these GPCRs are actually required for LTP/LTD induced by HFS/LFS experimental paradigms. In line with this conjecture, it would be interesting to determine if ligands for various GPCRs co-exist in the glutamatergic presynaptic terminals and, if so, can be differentially co-released with glutamate in a frequency-dependent manner, thereby contributing to either HFS-induced LTP or LFS-induced LTD.The findings by Yang and colleagues establish an exciting mechanistic model by which GPCRs can govern the direction of synaptic plasticity by determining the contributions of GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDARs through differential tyrosine phosphorylation of respective NMDA receptor subtypes. Additional studies further validating this model under physiological and pathological conditions will greatly improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity and cognitive brain functions. In addition, NMDARs, depending on their subunit composition and/or subcellular localization, may also have complex roles in mediating neuronal survival and death (Lai et al, 2011). Considering that neurotoxicity produced by over-activation of NMDARs is widely accepted to be a common mechanism for neuronal loss in a number of acute brain injuries and chronic neurodegenerative diseases, Yang and colleagues'' finding of the differential regulation of NMDAR subunits by different GPCRs could have wider implications beyond synaptic plasticity.     

Neurosteroid binding to the amino terminal and glutamate binding domains of ionotropic glutamate receptors

The endogenous neurosteroids, pregnenolone sulfate (PS) and 3α-hydroxy-5β-pregnan-20-one sulfate (PREGAS), have been shown to differentially regulate the ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) family of ligand-gated ion channels. Upon binding to these receptors, PREGAS decreases current flow through the channels. Upon binding to non-NMDA or NMDA receptors containing an GluN2C or GluN2D subunit, PS also decreases current flow through the channels, however, upon binding to NMDA receptors containing an GluN2A or GluN2B subunit, flow through the channels increases. To begin to understand this differential regulation, we have cloned the S1S2 and amino terminal domains (ATD) of the NMDA GluN2B and GluN2D and AMPA GluA2 subunits. Here we present results that show that PS and PREGAS bind to different sites in the ATD of the GluA2 subunit, which when combined with previous results from our lab, now identifies two binding domains for each neurosteroid. We also show both neurosteroids bind only to the ATD of the GluN2D subunit, suggesting that this binding is distinct from that of the AMPA GluA2 subunit, with both leading to iGluR inhibition. Finally, we provide evidence that both PS and PREGAS bind to the S1S2 domain of the NMDA GluN2B subunit. Neurosteroid binding to the S1S2 domain of NMDA subunits responsible for potentiation of iGluRs and to the ATD of NMDA subunits responsible for inhibition of iGluRs, provides an interesting option for therapeutic design.     

FRET-FLIM Investigation of PSD95-NMDA Receptor Interaction in Dendritic Spines; Control by Calpain,CaMKII and Src Family Kinase

Little is known about the changes in protein interactions inside synapses during synaptic remodeling, as their live monitoring in spines has been limited. We used a FRET-FLIM approach in developing cultured rat hippocampal neurons expressing fluorescently tagged NMDA receptor (NMDAR) and PSD95, two essential proteins in synaptic plasticity, to examine the regulation of their interaction. NMDAR stimulation caused a transient decrease in FRET between the NMDAR and PSD95 in spines of young and mature neurons. The activity of both CaMKII and calpain were essential for this effect in both developmental stages. Meanwhile, inhibition of Src family kinase (SFK) had opposing impacts on this decrease in FRET in young versus mature neurons. Our data suggest concerted roles for CaMKII, SFK and calpain activity in regulating activity-dependent separation of PSD95 from GluN2A or GluN2B. Finally, we found that calpain inhibition reduced spine growth that was caused by NMDAR activity, supporting the hypothesis that PSD95-NMDAR separation is implicated in synaptic remodeling.     

Amino terminal domains of the NMDA receptor are organized as local heterodimers

The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, an obligate heterotetrameric assembly organized as a dimer of dimers, is typically composed of two glycine-binding GluN1 subunits and two glutamate-binding GluN2 subunits. Despite the crucial role that the NMDA receptor plays in the nervous system, the specific arrangement of subunits within the dimer-of-dimer assemblage is not conclusively known. Here we studied the organization of the amino terminal domain (ATD) of the rat GluN1/GluN2A and GluN1/GluN2B NMDA receptors by cysteine-directed, disulfide bond-mediated cross-linking. We found that GluN1 ATDs and GluN2 ATDs spontaneously formed disulfide bond-mediated dimers after introducing cysteines into the L1 interface of GluN2A or GluN2B ATD. The formation of dimer could be prevented by knocking out endogenous cysteines located near the L1 interface of GluN1. These results indicate that GluN1 and GluN2 ATDs form local heterodimers through the interactions in the L1-L1 interface and further demonstrate a dimer-of-heterodimer arrangement in GluN1/GluN2A and GluN1/GluN2B NMDA receptors.     

Tyrosine phosphorylation of ionotropic glutamate receptors by Fyn or Src differentially modulates their susceptibility to calpain and enhances their binding to spectrin and PSD-95

Both tyrosine phosphorylation and calpain-mediated truncation of ionotropic glutamate receptors are important mechanisms for synaptic plasticity. Previous work from our laboratory has shown that calpain activation results in truncation of the C-terminal domains of several glutamate receptor subunits. To test whether and how tyrosine phosphorylation of glutamate ionotropic receptor subunits modulates calpain susceptibility, synaptic membranes were phosphorylated by Fyn or Src, two members of the Src family tyrosine kinases. Tyrosine phosphorylation of synaptic membranes by Src significantly reduced calpain-mediated truncation of both NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDA receptors, but not of GluR1 subunits of AMPA receptors. In contrast, phosphorylation with Fyn significantly protected calpain-mediated truncation of GluR1 subunits of AMPA receptors, but enhanced calpain-mediated truncation of NR2A subunits of NMDA receptors. Similar results were observed with NR2A and NR2B C-terminal domain fusion proteins phosphorylated by Fyn or Src before incubation with calpain and calcium. In addition, phosphorylation of NR2A and NR2B C-terminal fusion proteins by Fyn or Src enhanced their binding to spectrin and PSD-95. Thus, tyrosine phosphorylation impairs or facilitates calpain-mediated truncation of glutamate receptor subunits, depending on which tyrosine kinase is activated. Such mechanisms could serve to regulate receptor integrity and location, in addition to modulating channel properties.     

Lithium-induced inhibition of Src tyrosine kinase in rat cerebral cortical neurons: a role in neuroprotection against N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity

The neuroprotective effects of lithium, a mood stabilizer, against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity in rat cortical neurons were associated with a decrease in Tyr1472 phosphorylation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor NR2B subunit and a loss of receptor activity. Since this receptor tyrosine phosphorylation is mediated by the Src-family tyrosine kinases, we investigated the effects of lithium on the Src kinase activity. Levels of phosphorylated Src kinase at Tyr416, an index of Src activation, were reduced after treatment with LiCl (1 mM) for more than 3 days. Protein levels of Src-family kinases such as Src, Fyn, and Yes were unchanged by lithium treatment. The activities of cytosolic protein tyrosine kinase and protein phosphatase were also unchanged by lithium treatment, indicating the selectivity and the modulation. Moreover, the levels of postsynaptic densities (PSD) and SynGAP, the scaffolding proteins of the NMDA receptor complex, were unaltered by lithium. A Src kinase inhibitor, SU6656, and an NR2B antagonist, ifenprodil, partially blocked glutamate excitotoxicity. Our results suggest that lithium-induced inactivation of Src kinase contributes to this drug-induced NMDA receptor inhibition and neuroprotection against excitotoxicity.     

Identification of mouse NMDA receptor subunit NR2A C-terminal tyrosine sites phosphorylated by coexpression with v-Src

The protein tyrosine kinase Src is known to regulate NMDA receptors in native neurons. While NR2A, NR2B and NR2D are known to be phosphorylated on tyrosine residues, the exact sites have remained unidentified. Immunoprecipitation of NMDA receptor subunits followed by western blotting was used to analyze the state of tyrosine phosphorylation of recombinant NMDA receptor subunits expressed in HEK293 cells. Using antiphosphotyrosine antibody PY20, we find that on expression in HEK cells, v-Src and Fyn cause detectable tyrosine phosphorylation only of NR2A. Because a stronger signal was produced by the constitutively active v-Src, the general region of v-Src phosphorylation was delimited by expression of a series of truncation mutants of NR2A. Site-directed mutagenesis on candidate sites within the likely region allowed identification of three sites, Y1292, Y1325, and Y1387 that account for a significant fraction of the total PY20 signal. Two of these sites, Y1292 and Y1387, were suggested to control current modulation by Src in previous studies of HEK cells expressing NR1/NR2A. One of these sites, Y1325, has not yet been evaluated for effects on receptor current. A unique tyrosine site, Y1267, was shown not to be a site of detectable phosphorylation, in accordance with its Src-independent regulation of receptor currents.     

Subtype-dependent N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Amino-terminal Domain Conformations and Modulation by Spermine

The N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of the ionotropic glutamate receptors is the primary mediator of calcium-permeable excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system. Subunit composition and binding of allosteric modulators to the amino-terminal domain determine the open probability of the channel. By using luminescence resonance energy transfer with functional receptors expressed in CHO cells, we show that the cleft of the amino-terminal domain of the GluN2B subunit, which has a lower channel open probability, is on average more closed than the GluN2A subunit, which has a higher open probability. Furthermore, the GluN1 amino-terminal domain adopts a more open conformation when coassembled with GluN2A than with GluN2B. Binding of spermine, an allosteric potentiator, opens the amino-terminal domain cleft of both the GluN2B subunit and the adjacent GluN1 subunit. These studies provide direct structural evidence that the inherent conformations of the amino-terminal domains vary based on the subunit and match the reported open probabilities for the receptor.     

Neto1 associates with the NMDA receptor/amyloid precursor protein complex

Neuropilin tolloid‐like 1 (Neto1), is a CUB domain‐containing transmembrane protein that was recently identified as a novel component of the NMDA receptor complex. Here, we have investigated the possible association of Neto1 with the amyloid precursor protein (APP)695/GluN1/GluN2A and APP695/GluN1/GluN2B NMDA receptor trafficking complexes that we have previously identified. Neto1^HA was shown to co‐immunoprecipitate with assembled NMDA receptors via GluN2A or GluN2B subunits; Neto1^HA did not co‐immunoprecipitate APP695^FLAG. Co‐immunoprecipitations from mammalian cells co‐transfected with APP695^FLAG, Neto1^HA and GluN1/GluN2A or GluN1/GluN2B revealed that all four proteins co‐exist within one macromolecular complex. Immunoprecipitations from native brain tissue similarly revealed the existence of a GluN1/GluN2A or GluN2B/APP/Neto1 complex. Neto1^HA caused a reduction in the surface expression of both NMDA receptor subtypes, but had no effect on APP695^FLAG‐ or PSD‐95α^c‐Myc enhanced surface receptor expression. The Neto1 binding domain of GluN2A was mapped using GluN1/GluN2A chimeras and GluN2A truncation constructs. The extracellular GluN2A domain does not contribute to association with Neto1^HA but deletion of the intracellular tail resulted in a loss of Neto‐1^HA co‐immunoprecipitation which was paralleled by a loss of association between GluN2A and SAP102. Thus, Neto1 is concluded to be a component of APP/NMDA receptor trafficking complexes.