Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.     

The Mouse C2C12 Myoblast Cell Surface N-Linked Glycoproteome: IDENTIFICATION, GLYCOSITE OCCUPANCY, AND MEMBRANE ORIENTATION*

Endogenous regeneration and repair mechanisms are responsible for replacing dead and damaged cells to maintain or enhance tissue and organ function, and one of the best examples of endogenous repair mechanisms involves skeletal muscle. Although the molecular mechanisms that regulate the differentiation of satellite cells and myoblasts toward myofibers are not fully understood, cell surface proteins that sense and respond to their environment play an important role. The cell surface capturing technology was used here to uncover the cell surface N-linked glycoprotein subproteome of myoblasts and to identify potential markers of myoblast differentiation. 128 bona fide cell surface-exposed N-linked glycoproteins, including 117 transmembrane, four glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored, five extracellular matrix, and two membrane-associated proteins were identified from mouse C2C12 myoblasts. The data set revealed 36 cluster of differentiation-annotated proteins and confirmed the occupancy for 235 N-linked glycosylation sites. The identification of the N-glycosylation sites on the extracellular domain of the proteins allowed for the determination of the orientation of the identified proteins within the plasma membrane. One glycoprotein transmembrane orientation was found to be inconsistent with Swiss-Prot annotations, whereas ambiguous annotations for 14 other proteins were resolved. Several of the identified N-linked glycoproteins, including aquaporin-1 and β-sarcoglycan, were found in validation experiments to change in overall abundance as the myoblasts differentiate toward myotubes. Therefore, the strategy and data presented shed new light on the complexity of the myoblast cell surface subproteome and reveal new targets for the clinically important characterization of cell intermediates during myoblast differentiation into myotubes.Endogenous regeneration and repair mechanisms are responsible for replacing dead and damaged cells to maintain or enhance tissue and organ function. One of the best examples of endogenous repair mechanisms involves skeletal muscle, which has innate regenerative capacity (for reviews, see Refs. 1–4). Skeletal muscle repair begins with satellite cells, a heterogeneous population of mitotically quiescent cells located in the basal lamina that surrounds adult skeletal myofibers (5, 6), that, when activated, rapidly proliferate (7). The progeny of activated satellite cells, known as myogenic precursor cells or myoblasts, undergo several rounds of division prior to withdrawal from the cell cycle. This is followed by fusion to form terminally differentiated multinucleated myotubes and skeletal myofibers (7, 8). These cells effectively repair or replace damaged cells or contribute to an increase in skeletal muscle mass.The molecular mechanisms that regulate differentiation of satellite cells and myoblasts toward myofibers are not fully understood, although it is known that the cell surface proteome plays an important biological role in skeletal muscle differentiation. Examples include how cell surface proteins modulate myoblast elongation, orientation, and fusion (for a review, see Ref. 8). The organization and fusion of myoblasts is mediated, in part, by cadherins (for reviews, see Refs. 9 and 10), which enhance skeletal muscle differentiation and are implicated in myoblast fusion (11). Neogenin, another cell surface protein, is also a likely regulator of myotube formation via the netrin ligand signal transduction pathway (12, 13), and the family of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors (Edg receptors) are known key signal transduction molecules involved in regulating myogenic differentiation (14–17). Given the important role of these proteins, identifying and characterizing the cell surface proteins present on myoblasts in a more comprehensive approach could provide insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in skeletal muscle development and repair. The identification of naturally occurring cell surface proteins (i.e. markers) could also foster the enrichment and/or characterization of cell intermediates during differentiation that could be useful therapeutically.Although it is possible to use techniques such as flow cytometry, antibody arrays, and microscopy to probe for known proteins on the cell surface in discrete populations, these methods rely on a priori knowledge of the proteins present on the cell surface and the availability/specificity of an antibody. Proteomics approaches coupled with mass spectrometry offer an alternative approach that is antibody-independent and allows for the de novo discovery of proteins on the surface. One approach, which was used in the current study, exploits the fact that a majority of the cell surface proteins are glycosylated (18). The method uses hydrazide chemistry (19) to immobilize and enrich for glycoproteins/glycopeptides, and previous studies using this chemistry have successfully identified soluble glycoproteins (20–24) as well as cell surface glycoproteins (25–28). A recently optimized hydrazide chemistry strategy by Wollscheid et al. (29) termed cell surface capturing (CSC)¹ technology, reports the ability to identify cell surface (plasma membrane) proteins specifically with little (<15%) contamination from non-cell surface proteins. The specificity stems from the fact that the oligosaccharide structure is labeled using membrane-impermeable reagents while the cells are intact rather than after cell lysis. Consequently, only extracellular oligosaccharides are labeled and subsequently captured. Utilizing information regarding the glycosylation site then allows for a rapid elimination of nonspecifically captured proteins (i.e. non-cell surface proteins) during the data analysis process, a feature that makes this approach unique to methods where no label or tag is used. Additionally, the CSC technology provides information about glycosylation site occupancy (i.e. whether a potential N-linked glycosylation site is actually glycosylated), which is important for determining the protein orientation within the membrane and, therefore, antigen selection and antibody design.To uncover information about the cell surface of myoblasts and to identify potential markers of myoblast differentiation, we used the CSC technology on the mouse myoblast C2C12 cell line model system (30, 31). This adherent cell line derived from satellite cells has routinely been used as a model for skeletal muscle development (e.g. Refs. 1, 32, and 33), skeletal muscle differentiation (e.g. Refs. 34–36), and studying muscular dystrophy (e.g. Refs. 37–39). Additionally, these cells have been used in cell-based therapies (e.g. Refs. 40–42). Using the CSC technology, 128 cell surface N-linked glycoproteins were identified, including several that were found to change in overall abundance as the myoblasts differentiate toward myotubes. The current data also confirmed the occupancy of 235 N-linked glycosites of which 226 were previously unconfirmed. The new information provided by the current study is expected to facilitate the development of useful tools for studying the differentiation of myoblasts toward myotubes.     

A Small Conserved Domain in the Yeast Spa2p Is Necessary and Sufficient for Its Polarized Localization

SPA2 encodes a yeast protein that is one of the first proteins to localize to sites of polarized growth, such as the shmoo tip and the incipient bud. The dynamics and requirements for Spa2p localization in living cells are examined using Spa2p green fluorescent protein fusions. Spa2p localizes to one edge of unbudded cells and subsequently is observable in the bud tip. Finally, during cytokinesis Spa2p is present as a ring at the mother–daughter bud neck. The bud emergence mutants bem1 and bem2 and mutants defective in the septins do not affect Spa2p localization to the bud tip. Strikingly, a small domain of Spa2p comprised of 150 amino acids is necessary and sufficient for localization to sites of polarized growth. This localization domain and the amino terminus of Spa2p are essential for its function in mating. Searching the yeast genome database revealed a previously uncharacterized protein which we name, Sph1p (Spa2p homolog), with significant homology to the localization domain and amino terminus of Spa2p. This protein also localizes to sites of polarized growth in budding and mating cells. SPH1, which is similar to SPA2, is required for bipolar budding and plays a role in shmoo formation. Overexpression of either Spa2p or Sph1p can block the localization of either protein fused to green fluorescent protein, suggesting that both Spa2p and Sph1p bind to and are localized by the same component. The identification of a 150–amino acid domain necessary and sufficient for localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth and the existence of this domain in another yeast protein Sph1p suggest that the early localization of these proteins may be mediated by a receptor that recognizes this small domain.Polarized cell growth and division are essential cellular processes that play a crucial role in the development of eukaryotic organisms. Cell fate can be determined by cell asymmetry during cell division (Horvitz and Herskowitz, 1992; Cohen and Hyman, 1994; Rhyu and Knoblich, 1995). Consequently, the molecules involved in the generation and maintenance of cell asymmetry are important in the process of cell fate determination. Polarized growth can occur in response to external signals such as growth towards a nutrient (Rodriguez-Boulan and Nelson, 1989; Eaton and Simons, 1995) or hormone (Jackson and Hartwell, 1990a , b ; Segall, 1993; Keynes and Cook, 1995) and in response to internal signals as in Caenorhabditis elegans (Goldstein et al., 1993; Kimble, 1994; Priess, 1994) and Drosophila melanogaster (St Johnston and Nusslein-Volhard, 1992; Anderson, 1995) early development. Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo polarized growth towards an external cue during mating and to an internal cue during budding. Polarization towards a mating partner (shmoo formation) and towards a new bud site requires a number of proteins (Chenevert, 1994; Chant, 1996; Drubin and Nelson, 1996). Many of these proteins are necessary for both processes and are localized to sites of polarized growth, identified by the insertion of new cell wall material (Tkacz and Lampen, 1972; Farkas et al., 1974; Lew and Reed, 1993) to the shmoo tip, bud tip, and mother–daughter bud neck. In yeast, proteins localized to growth sites include cytoskeletal proteins (Adams and Pringle, 1984; Kilmartin and Adams, 1984; Ford, S.K., and J.R. Pringle. 1986. Yeast. 2:S114; Drubin et al., 1988; Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Amatruda and Cooper, 1992; Lew and Reed, 1993; Waddle et al., 1996), neck filament components (septins) (Byers and Goetsch, 1976; Kim et al., 1991; Ford and Pringle, 1991; Haarer and Pringle, 1987; Longtine et al., 1996), motor proteins (Lillie and Brown, 1994), G-proteins (Ziman, 1993; Yamochi et al., 1994; Qadota et al., 1996), and two membrane proteins (Halme et al., 1996; Roemer et al., 1996; Qadota et al., 1996). Septins, actin, and actin-associated proteins localize early in the cell cycle, before a bud or shmoo tip is recognizable. How this group of proteins is localized to and maintained at sites of cell growth remains unclear.Spa2p is one of the first proteins involved in bud formation to localize to the incipient bud site before a bud is recognizable (Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Chant, 1996). Spa2p has been localized to where a new bud will form at approximately the same time as actin patches concentrate at this region (Snyder et al., 1991). An understanding of how Spa2p localizes to incipient bud sites will shed light on the very early stages of cell polarization. Later in the cell cycle, Spa2p is also found at the mother–daughter bud neck in cells undergoing cytokinesis. Spa2p, a nonessential protein, has been shown to be involved in bud site selection (Snyder, 1989; Zahner et al., 1996), shmoo formation (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990), and mating (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990; Chenevert et al., 1994; Yorihuzi and Ohsumi, 1994; Dorer et al., 1995). Genetic studies also suggest that Spa2p has a role in cytokinesis (Flescher et al., 1993), yet little is known about how this protein is localized to sites of polarized growth.We have used Spa2p green fluorescent protein (GFP)¹ fusions to investigate the early localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth in living cells. Our results demonstrate that a small domain of ∼150 amino acids of this large 1,466-residue protein is sufficient for targeting to sites of polarized growth and is necessary for Spa2p function. Furthermore, we have identified and characterized a novel yeast protein, Sph1p, which has homology to both the Spa2p amino terminus and the Spa2p localization domain. Sph1p localizes to similar regions of polarized growth and sph1 mutants have similar phenotypes as spa2 mutants.     

Quantitative Proteomics Reveals that Plasma Membrane Microdomains From Poplar Cell Suspension Cultures Are Enriched in Markers of Signal Transduction,Molecular Transport,and Callose Biosynthesis

The plasma membrane (PM) is a highly dynamic interface that contains detergent-resistant microdomains (DRMs). The aim of this work was to determine the main functions of such microdomains in poplar through a proteomic analysis using gel-based and solution (iTRAQ) approaches. A total of 80 proteins from a limited number of functional classes were found to be significantly enriched in DRM relative to PM. The enriched proteins are markers of signal transduction, molecular transport at the PM, or cell wall biosynthesis. Their intrinsic properties are presented and discussed together with the biological significance of their enrichment in DRM. Of particular importance is the significant and specific enrichment of several callose [(1→3)-β-glucan] synthase isoforms, whose catalytic activity represents a final response to stress, leading to the deposition of callose plugs at the surface of the PM. An integrated functional model that connects all DRM-enriched proteins identified is proposed. This report is the only quantitative analysis available to date of the protein composition of membrane microdomains from a tree species.The plasma membrane (PM)¹ is considered as one of the most interactive and dynamic supramolecular structures of the cell (1, 2). It forms a physical interface between the cytoplasm and the extracellular environment and is involved in many biological processes such as metabolite and ion transport, gaseous exchanges, endocytosis, cell differentiation and proliferation, defense against pathogens, etc. (3). Various combinations of biochemical and analytical approaches have been used to characterize the PM proteome in different organisms such as yeast, plants, and animals (4–8). Typically, PM proteins are either embedded in the phospholipid bilayer through transmembrane helices or less tightly bound to the membrane through reversible or irreversible surface interactions. In eukaryotic cells, some PM proteins are enriched in lateral lipid patches that form microdomains within the membrane (9, 10). These microdomains are considered to act as functional units that support and regulate specific biological processes associated with the PM (9, 10). Often referred to as “membrane (lipid) rafts” in animals and other organisms, they are typically described as being enriched in sphingolipids, sterols, and phospholipids that contain essentially saturated fatty acids (9–11). Early work on PM microdomains has suggested that their specific lipid composition confers resistance to certain concentrations of nonionic detergents, such as Triton X-100 and Nonidet P-40 (10, 11). Although this property has been exploited experimentally to isolate so-called detergent-resistant microdomains (DRMs), the relationship between DRMs and membrane rafts remains controversial (12). Indeed, the relation between the two is much debated, essentially because the use of Triton X-100 at 4 °C to prepare DRMs has been proposed to potentially induce the artificial formation of detergent-resistant structures whose composition may not fully reflect that of physiological membrane rafts (12). Nonetheless, DRM preparations represent an excellent system for the isolation and identification of groups of proteins—eventually associated in complexes—that tend to naturally interact with specific sets of lipids, thereby forming specialized functional units. Their biochemical characterization is therefore most useful in attempts to better understand the mode of interaction of specific proteins with sterols and sphingolipids and to gain insight into the protein composition and biological activity of subdomains from the PM.Plant DRMs have been understudied relative to their animal counterparts. Indeed, proteomic studies have been undertaken on DRM preparations from only a limited number of plant species. These include tobacco (13–15), Arabidopsis (16), barrel clover (Medicago truncatula) (17), rice (18), oat, and rye (19). These studies, essentially based on qualitative or semi-quantitative proteomics, led to the identification of hundreds of proteins involved in a large range of mechanisms, functions, and biochemical activities (15–19). Depending on the report considered, a variable proportion of the identified proteins can be intuitively linked to DRMs and potentially to PM microdomains. However, many proteins that are clearly not related to the PM and its microdomains co-purify with DRM. These include, for instance, soluble proteins from cytoplasmic metabolic pathways; histones; and ribosomal, chloroplastic, and mitochondrial proteins (15–19). Thus, there is a need to obtain a more restricted list of proteins that are specifically enriched in DRMs and that define specialized functional structures. One way to tackle this problem is through quantitative proteomics, eventually in combination with complementary biochemical approaches. Although quantitative techniques have been increasingly applied to the proteomic analysis of complex mixtures of soluble proteins, their exploitation for the characterization of membrane samples remains challenging. As a result, very few studies of plant DRMs have been based on truly quantitative methods. For instance, stable isotope labeling combined with the selective disruption of sterol-rich membrane domains by methylcyclodextrin was performed in Arabidopsis cell cultures (20). A similar approach was used to study compositional changes of tobacco DRMs upon cell treatment with the signaling elicitor cryptogenin (21). In another study, 64 Arabidopsis proteins were shown to be significantly enriched in DRMs in response to a pathogen-associated molecular pattern protein (22). Together, these few quantitative proteomics analyses suggest a role of plant membrane microdomains in signal transduction, as in mammalian cells.Although several reports describe the partial characterization of DRMs from higher plants (13–23), there are no data available to date on the protein composition of DRMs from a tree species. We have therefore employed a quantitative proteomic approach for the characterization of DRMs from cell suspension cultures of Populus trichocarpa. In addition, earlier work in our laboratory based on biochemical activity assays revealed the presence of cell wall polysaccharide synthases in DRMs from poplar (23), which suggests the existence of DRM populations specialized in cell wall biosynthesis. This concept was further supported by similar investigations performed on DRMs isolated from the oomycete Saprolegnia monoica (24). The comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis performed here revealed enrichment in the poplar DRMs of specific carbohydrate synthases involved in callose polymerization. Consistent with the role of callose in plant defense mechanisms, additional proteins related to stress responses and signal transduction were found to be specifically enriched in the poplar DRMs, together with proteins involved in molecular transport. To date, our report is the only analysis available of the DRM proteome of a tree species based on quantitative proteomics. The specific biochemical properties of the 80 proteins significantly enriched in DRMs are described and examined in relation to their localization in membrane microdomains. The relationship between poplar DRMs and molecular transport, signal transduction, stress responses, and callose biosynthesis is discussed, with support from a hypothetical model that integrates the corresponding enriched proteins.