Structures and interactions of the core histone tail domains

The core histone tail domains are "master control switches" that help define the structural and functional characteristics of chromatin at many levels. The tails modulate DNA accessibility within the nucleosome, are essential for stable folding of oligonucleosome arrays into condensed chromatin fibers, and are important for fiber-fiber interactions involved in higher order structures. Many nuclear signaling pathways impinge upon the tail domains, resulting in posttranslational modifications that are likely to alter the charge, structure, and/or interactions of the core histone tails or to serve as targets for the binding of ancillary proteins or other enzymatic functions. However, currently we have only a marginal understanding of the molecular details of core histone tail conformations and contacts. Here we review data related to the structures and interactions of the core histone tail domains and how these domains and posttranslational modifications therein may define the structure and function of chromatin.     

Chromatin fiber folding: requirement for the histone H4 N-terminal tail

We have developed a self-assembly system for nucleosome arrays in which recombinant, post-translationally unmodified histone proteins are combined with DNA of defined-sequence to form chromatin higher-order structure. The nucleosome arrays obtained are highly homogeneous and sediment at 53S when maximally folded in 1mM or 100mM MgCl(2). The folding properties are comparable to established systems. Analytical ultracentrifugation is used to determine the consequence of individual histone tail domain deletions on array folding. Fully compacted chromatin fibers are obtained with any one of the histone tails deleted with the exception of the H4 N terminus. The region of the H4 tail, which mediates compaction, resides in the stretch of amino acids 14-19.     

Surprising Twists in Nucleosomal DNA with Implication for Higher-order Folding

While nucleosomes are dynamic entities that must undergo structural deformations to perform their functions, the general view from available high-resolution structures is a largely static one. Even though numerous examples of twist defects have been documented, the DNA wrapped around the histone core is generally thought to be overtwisted. Analysis of available high-resolution structures from the Protein Data Bank reveals a heterogeneous distribution of twist along the nucleosomal DNA, with clear patterns that are consistent with the literature, and a significant fraction of structures that are undertwisted. The subtle differences in nucleosomal DNA folding, which extend beyond twist, have implications for nucleosome disassembly and modeled higher-order structures. Simulations of oligonucleosome arrays built with undertwisted models behave very differently from those constructed from overtwisted models, in terms of compaction and inter-nucleosome contacts, introducing configurational changes equivalent to those associated with 2–3 base-pair changes in nucleosome spacing. Differences in the nucleosomal DNA pathway, which underlie the way that DNA enters and exits the nucleosome, give rise to different nucleosome-decorated minicircles and affect the topological mix of configurational states.     

Nucleosome Spacing Generated by ISWI and CHD1 Remodelers Is Constant Regardless of Nucleosome Density

Arrays of regularly spaced nucleosomes are a hallmark of chromatin, but it remains unclear how they are generated. Recent genome-wide studies, in vitro and in vivo, showed constant nucleosome spacing even if the histone concentration was experimentally reduced. This counters the long-held assumption that nucleosome density determines spacing and calls for factors keeping spacing constant regardless of nucleosome density. We call this a clamping activity. Here, we show in a purified system that ISWI- and CHD1-type nucleosome remodelers have a clamping activity such that they not only generate regularly spaced nucleosome arrays but also generate constant spacing regardless of nucleosome density. This points to a functionally attractive nucleosome interaction that could be mediated either directly by nucleosome-nucleosome contacts or indirectly through the remodelers. Mutant Drosophila melanogaster ISWI without the HAND-SANT-SLIDE (HSS) domain had no detectable spacing activity even though it is known to remodel and slide nucleosomes. This suggests that the role of ISWI remodelers in generating constant spacing is not just to mediate nucleosome sliding; they actively contribute to the attractive interaction. Additional factors are necessary to set physiological spacing in absolute terms.     

Touch,act and go: landing and operating on nucleosomes

Chromatin‐associated enzymes are responsible for the installation, removal and reading of precise post‐translation modifications on DNA and histone proteins. They are specifically recruited to the target gene by associated factors, and as a result of their activity, they contribute in modulating cell identity and differentiation. Structural and biophysical approaches are broadening our knowledge on these processes, demonstrating that DNA, histone tails and histone surfaces can each function as distinct yet functionally interconnected anchoring points promoting nucleosome binding and modification. The mechanisms underlying nucleosome recognition have been described for many histone modifiers and related readers. Here, we review the recent literature on the structural organization of these nucleosome‐associated proteins, the binding properties that drive nucleosome modification and the methodological advances in their analysis. The overarching conclusion is that besides acting on the same substrate (the nucleosome), each system functions through characteristic modes of action, which bring about specific biological functions in gene expression regulation.     

CENP-A Nucleosome is a Sensitive Allosteric Scaffold for DNA and Chromatin Factors

Centromeric loci of chromosomes are defined by nucleosomes containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A, which bind their DNA termini more permissively than their canonical counterpart, a feature that is critical for the mitotic fidelity. A recent cryo-EM study demonstrated that the DNA termini of CENP-A nucleosomes, reconstituted with the Widom 601 DNA sequence, are asymmetrically flexible, meaning one terminus is more clearly resolved than the other. However, an earlier work claimed that both ends could be resolved in the presence of two stabilizing single chain variable fragment (scFv) antibodies per nucleosome, and thus are likely permanently bound to the histone octamer. This suggests that the binding of scFv antibodies to the histone octamer surface would be associated with CENP-A nucleosome conformational changes, including stable binding of the DNA termini. Here, we present computational evidence that allows to explain at atomistic level the structural rearrangements of CENP-A nucleosomes resulting from the antibody binding. The antibodies, while they only bind the octamer façades, are capable of altering the dynamics of the nucleosomal core, and indirectly also the surrounding DNA. This effect has more drastic implications for the structure and the dynamics of the CENP-A nucleosome in comparison to its canonical counterpart. Furthermore, we find evidence that the antibodies bind the left and the right octamer façades at different affinities, another manifestation of the DNA sequence. We speculate that the cells could use induction of similar allosteric effects to control centromere function.     

The affinity of DNA sequences containing R5Y5 motif and TA repeats with 10.5-bp periodicity to histone octamer in vitro

Nucleosome positioning along the genome is partially determined by the intrinsic DNA sequence preferences on histone. RRRRRYYYYY (R5Y5, R?=?Purine and Y?=?Pyrimidine) motif in nucleosome DNA, which was presented based on several theoretical models by Trifonov et al., might be a facilitating sequence pattern for nucleosome assembly. However, there is not a high conformity experimental evidence to support the concept that R5Y5 motif is a key element for the determination of nucleosome positioning. In this work, the ability of the canonical, H2A.Z- and H3.3-containing octamers to assemble nucleosome on DNA templates containing R5Y5 motif and TA repeats within 10.5-bp periodicity was investigated by using salt-dialysis method in vitro. The results showed that the10.5-bp periodical distributions of both R5Y5 motif and TA repeats along DNA templates can significantly promote canonical nucleosome assembly and may be key sequence factors for canonical nucleosome assembly. Compared with TA repeats within 10.5-bp periodicity, R5Y5 motif in DNA templates did not elevate H2A.Z- and H3.3-containing nucleosome formation efficiency in vitro. This result indicates that R5Y5 motif probably isn’t a pivotal factor to regulate nucleosome assembly on histone variants. It is speculated that the regulatory mechanism of nucleosome assembly is different between canonical and variant histone. These conclusions can provide a deeper insight on the mechanism of nucleosome positioning.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma     

Breaths,Twists, and Turns of Atomistic Nucleosomes

Gene regulation programs establish cellular identity and rely on dynamic changes in the structural packaging of genomic DNA. The DNA is packaged in chromatin, which is formed from arrays of nucleosomes displaying different degree of compaction and different lengths of inter-nucleosomal linker DNA. The nucleosome represents the repetitive unit of chromatin and is formed by wrapping 145–147 basepairs of DNA around an octamer of histone proteins. Each of the four histones is present twice and has a structured core and intrinsically disordered terminal tails. Chromatin dynamics are triggered by inter- and intra-nucleosome motions that are controlled by the DNA sequence, the interactions between the histone core and the DNA, and the conformations, positions, and DNA interactions of the histone tails. Understanding chromatin dynamics requires studying all these features at the highest possible resolution. For this, molecular dynamics simulations can be used as a powerful complement or alternative to experimental approaches, from which it is often very challenging to characterize the structural features and atomic interactions controlling nucleosome motions. Molecular dynamics simulations can be performed at different resolutions, by coarse graining the molecular system with varying levels of details. Here we review the successes and the remaining challenges of the application of atomic resolution simulations to study the structure and dynamics of nucleosomes and their complexes with interacting partners.     

ACF catalyses chromatosome movements in chromatin fibres

Nucleosome-remodelling factors containing the ATPase ISWI, such as ACF, render DNA in chromatin accessible by promoting the sliding of histone octamers. Although the ATP-dependent repositioning of mononucleosomes is readily observable in vitro, it is unclear to which extent nucleosomes can be moved in physiological chromatin, where neighbouring nucleosomes, linker histones and the folding of the nucleosomal array restrict mobility. We assembled arrays consisting of 12 nucleosomes or 12 chromatosomes (nucleosomes plus linker histone) from defined components and subjected them to remodelling by ACF or the ATPase CHD1. Both factors increased the access to DNA in nucleosome arrays. ACF, but not CHD1, catalysed profound movements of nucleosomes throughout the array, suggesting different remodelling mechanisms. Linker histones inhibited remodelling by CHD1. Surprisingly, ACF catalysed significant repositioning of entire chromatosomes in chromatin containing saturating levels of linker histone H1. H1 inhibited the ATP-dependent generation of DNA accessibility by only about 50%. This first demonstration of catalysed chromatosome movements suggests that the bulk of interphase euchromatin may be rendered dynamic by dedicated nucleosome-remodelling factors.     

ATP dependent histone phosphorylation and nucleosome assembly in a human cell free extract.

Physiologically spaced nucleosome formation in HeLa cell extracts is ATP dependent. ATP hydrolysis is required for chromatin assembly on both linear and covalently closed circular DNA. The link between the phosphorylation state of histones and nucleosome formation has been examined and we demonstrate that in the absence of histone phosphorylation no stable and regularly spaced nucleosomes are formed. Phosphorylated H3 stabilizes the nucleosome core; while phosphorylation of histone H2a is necessary to increase the linker length between nucleosomes from 0 to approximately 45 bp. Histone H1 alone, whether phosphorylated or unphosphorylated, does not increase the nucleosome repeat length in the absence of core histone phosphorylation. Phosphorylations of H1 and H3 correlate with condensation of chromatin. Maximum ATP hydrolysis which is necessary to increase the periodicity of nucleosomes from approximately 150 to approximately 185 bp, not only inhibits H1 and H3 phosphorylation but facilitates their dephosphorylation.     

Sin mutations alter inherent nucleosome mobility

Previous studies have identified sin mutations that alleviate the requirement for the yeast SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex, which include point changes in the yeast genes encoding core histones. Here we characterise the biochemical properties of nucleosomes bearing these mutations. We find that sin mutant nucleosomes have a high inherent thermal mobility. As the SWI/SNF complex can alter nucleosome positioning, the higher mobility of sin mutant nucleosomes provides a means by which sin mutations may substitute for SWI/SNF function. The location of sin mutations also provides a new opportunity for insights into the mechanism for nucleosome mobilisation. We find that both mutations altering histone DNA contacts at the nucleosome dyad and mutations in the dimer-tetramer interface influence nucleosome mobility. Furthermore, incorporation of H2A.Z into nucleosomes, which also alters dimer-tetramer interactions, affects nucleosome mobility. Thus, variation of histone sequence or subtype provides a means by which eukaryotes may regulate access to chromatin through alterations to nucleosome mobility.     

Human CAF-1-dependent nucleosome assembly in a defined system

Replication-coupled nucleosome assembly is a critical step in packaging newly synthesized DNA into chromatin. Previous studies have defined the importance of the histone chaperones CAF-1 and ASF1A, the replicative clamp PCNA, and the clamp loader RFC for the assembly of nucleosomes during DNA replication. Despite significant progress in the field, replication-coupled nucleosome assembly is not well understood. One of the complications in elucidating the mechanisms of replication-coupled nucleosome assembly is the lack of a defined system that faithfully recapitulates this important biological process in vitro. We describe here a defined system that assembles nucleosomal arrays in a manner dependent on the presence of CAF-1, ASF1A-H3-H4, H2A-H2B, PCNA, RFC, NAP1L1, ATP, and strand breaks. The loss of CAF-1 p48 subunit causes a strong defect in packaging DNA into nucleosomes by this system. We also show that the defined system forms nucleosomes on nascent DNA synthesized by the replicative polymerase δ. Thus, the developed system reproduces several key features of replication-coupled nucleosome assembly.