Genetic Subtype-Independent Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication by CC and CXC Chemokines

We have studied the breadth and potency of the inhibitory actions of the CC chemokines macrophage inhibitory protein 1α (MIP-1α), MIP-1β, and RANTES against macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and of the CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1α against T-cell-tropic (T-tropic) isolates, using mitogen-stimulated primary CD4⁺ T cells as targets. There was considerable interisolate variation in the sensitivity of HIV-1 to chemokine inhibition, which was especially pronounced for the CC chemokines and M-tropic strains. However, this variation was not obviously dependent on the genetic subtype (A through F) of the virus isolates. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell donor-dependent variation in chemokine inhibition potency was also observed. Among the CC chemokines, the rank order for potency (from most to least potent) was RANTES, MIP-1β, MIP-1α. Some M-tropic isolates, unexpectedly, were much more sensitive to RANTES than to MIP-1β, whereas other isolates showed sensitivities comparable to those of these two chemokines. Down-regulation of the CCR5 and CXCR4 receptors occurred in cells treated with the cognate chemokines and probably contributes to anti-HIV-1 activity. Thus, for CCR5, the rank order for down-regulation was also RANTES, MIP-1β, MIP-1α.     

Biased Signaling at Chemokine Receptors

The ability of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to activate selective signaling pathways according to the conformation stabilized by bound ligands (signaling bias) is a challenging concept in the GPCR field. Signaling bias has been documented for several GPCRs, including chemokine receptors. However, most of these studies examined the global signaling bias between G protein- and arrestin-dependent pathways, leaving unaddressed the potential bias between particular G protein subtypes. Here, we investigated the coupling selectivity of chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7 in response to various ligands with G protein subtypes by using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer biosensors monitoring directly the activation of G proteins. We also compared data obtained with the G protein biosensors with those obtained with other functional readouts, such as β-arrestin-2 recruitment, cAMP accumulation, and calcium mobilization assays. We showed that the binding of chemokines to CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7 activated the three Gα_i subtypes (Gα_i1, Gα_i2, and Gα_i3) and the two Gα_o isoforms (Gα_oa and Gα_ob) with potencies that generally correlate to their binding affinities. In addition, we showed that the binding of chemokines to CCR5 and CCR2 also activated Gα₁₂, but not Gα₁₃. For each receptor, we showed that the relative potency of various agonist chemokines was not identical in all assays, supporting the notion that signaling bias exists at chemokine receptors.     

6-C-kine (SLC), a Lymphocyte Adhesion-triggering Chemokine Expressed by High Endothelium, Is an Agonist for the MIP-3β Receptor CCR7

The β chemokine known as 6-C-kine, secondary lymphoid-tissue chemokine (SLC), TCA4, or Exodus-2 (herein referred to as 6CK/SLC) can trigger rapid integrin-dependent arrest of lymphocytes rolling under physiological shear and is highly expressed by high endothelial venules, specialized vessels involved in lymphocyte homing from the blood into lymph nodes and Peyer's patches. We show that 6CK/SLC is an agonist for the lymphocyte chemoattractant receptor, CCR7 (EBI-1, BLR-2), previously described as a receptor for the related β chemokine MIP-3β (ELC or Exodus-3). Moreover, 6CK/SLC and MIP-3β attract the same major populations of circulating lymphocytes, including naive and memory T cells > B cells (but not natural killer cells); desensitization to MIP-3β inhibits lymphocyte chemotaxis to 6CK/SLC but not to the α chemokine SDF-1 (stromal cell–derived factor); and 6CK/SLC competes for MIP-3β binding to resting mouse lymphocytes. The findings suggest that the majority of circulating lymphocytes respond to 6CK/SLC and MIP-3β in large part through their common receptor CCR7 and that these molecules may be important mediators of physiological lymphocyte recirculation in vivo.     

Interference with Glycosaminoglycan-Chemokine Interactions with a Probe to Alter Leukocyte Recruitment and Inflammation In Vivo

In vivo leukocyte recruitment is not fully understood and may result from interactions of chemokines with glycosaminoglycans/GAGs. We previously showed that chlorite-oxidized oxyamylose/COAM binds the neutrophil chemokine GCP-2/CXCL6. Here, mouse chemokine binding by COAM was studied systematically and binding affinities of chemokines to COAM versus GAGs were compared. COAM and heparan sulphate bound the mouse CXC chemokines KC/CXCL1, MIP-2/CXCL2, IP-10/CXCL10 and I-TAC/CXCL11 and the CC chemokine RANTES/CCL5 with affinities in the nanomolar range, whereas no binding interactions were observed for mouse MCP-1/CCL2, MIP-1α/CCL3 and MIP-1β/CCL4. The affinities of COAM-interacting chemokines were similar to or higher than those observed for heparan sulphate. Although COAM did not display chemotactic activity by itself, its co-administration with mouse GCP-2/CXCL6 and MIP-2/CXCL2 or its binding of endogenous chemokines resulted in fast and cooperative peritoneal neutrophil recruitment and in extravasation into the cremaster muscle in vivo. These local GAG mimetic features by COAM within tissues superseded systemic effects and were sufficient and applicable to reduce LPS-induced liver-specific neutrophil recruitment and activation. COAM mimics glycosaminoglycans and is a nontoxic probe for the study of leukocyte recruitment and inflammation in vivo.     

The viral CC chemokine-binding protein vCCI inhibits monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 activity by masking its CCR2B-binding site

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is a chemotactic cytokine mainly acting on monocytes and T cells that elicits its biological effects by interacting with the seven-transmembrane helix receptor CCR2B. The vaccinia virus strain Lister and many other poxviruses express soluble proteins (vCCI) that bind MCP-1 and other CC chemokines and inhibit their function. In order to define the interaction site of MCP-1 with vCCI from vaccinia, surface exposed residues of MCP-1 were identified and mutated to alanine. The MCP-1 variants were expressed, purified, and their interaction with vCCI was characterized. The site on MCP-1 for vCCI binding is dominated by arginine 18 with important additional contributions from tyrosine 13 and arginine 24. These residues define a binding site that largely overlaps with the CCR2B receptor interaction site. The viral chemokine-binding protein vCCI thus inhibits the biological function of MCP-1 by directly masking its CCR2B receptor-binding site.     

Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Human CC Chemokine, SCYA26

By searching the Expressed Sequence Tag database, a full-length cDNA for a novel human CC chemokine was cloned. This cDNA encoded a 94-amino-acid protein with a putative signal peptide of 26 amino acids. The deduced mature protein had the four conserved cysteine residues characteristic of CC chemokines and showed 44% identity with MIP-1beta and 40% identity with MIP-1alpha, RANTES, and MCP-4. mRNA for this chemokine was expressed constitutively in human heart and liver and with lesser but detectable levels in skeletal muscle, kidney, and small intestine. To investigate its biological activity, the protein was expressed in mammalian cells and purified by affinity chromatography. The recombinant protein demonstrated chemotactic activity in vitro for T cells and monocytes but not for neutrophils. The gene was mapped to chromosome 7q11.2 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Based on its structural identity with other CC chemokines and the chemotactic activity and chromosomal location of this chemokine, we designate this chemokine small inducible cytokine subfamily A, member 26 (SCYA26). This gene symbol has been approved by the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee.     

N-terminal domain of eotaxin-3 is important for activation of CC chemokine receptor 3

Eotaxin-3 belongs to the CC chemokine family, and specifically recognizes CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 3 that is expressed on eosinophils, basophils and helper T type 2 cells. The three-dimensional structure of eotaxin-3 determined by nuclear magnetic resonance has revealed that the N-terminal nine residues preceding the first cysteine comprise an unstructured domain, which is also observed in other chemokine molecules. In order to determine the function of the N-terminal domain of eotaxin-3, we constructed various N-terminal-deletion mutants, and then examined their binding and chemotactic activities toward eosinophils in vitro. Competitive binding studies showed that the binding affinity of truncated mutant toward CCR3 was almost the same as that of wild-type eotaxin-3 even though the N-terminal truncation involved the first through to the ninth residues. In contrast, the chemotactic activity gradually decreased with extension of the N-terminal deletion, and when the deletion extended to the eighth residue, the activity was not detected at all. Thus, the N-terminal nine residues are not critical for binding but the N-terminal eight residues are essential for activation of CCR3. The truncated eotaxin-3 proteins lacking the N-terminal eight or nine residues inhibited the chemotactic activity of chemokines that recognize CCR3. The truncated mutants can possibly be used for anti-allergic and anti-HIV-1 therapy.     

High level expression, activation, and antagonism of CC chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR3 in Chinese hamster ovary cells

The specificity of leukocyte trafficking in inflammation is controlled by the interactions of chemokines with chemokine receptors. Reliable structure-function studies of chemokine-receptor interactions would benefit from cell lines that express consistent high levels of chemokine receptors. We describe herein two new Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines in which the genes for chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR3 have been incorporated into identical positions in the host genome. CCR2 is the primary receptor for the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) whereas CCR3 is the primary receptor for the chemokines eotaxin-1, eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3. Both receptors are expressed at >5,000,000 copies per cell, substantially higher levels than in previous cell lines, and both are competent for binding and activation by the cognate chemokines for these receptors. Using these cell lines we confirm that eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-3 can act as an agonist and an antagonist, respectively, of CCR2. In addition, we show that eotaxin-2 is an antagonist of CCR2 and MCP-1 is an agonist of CCR3. Comparison of the chemokine sequences reveals several positions that are identical in MCP-1 and eotaxin-1 but different in eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3, suggesting that these amino acids play a role in CCR2 activation.     

Analysis of Plasma Cytokine and Chemokine Profiles in Patients with and without Tuberculosis by Liquid Array-Based Multiplexed Immunoassays

The aim of this study was to establish plasma cytokine/chemokine profiles in patients with 3 different presentations of active tuberculosis (TB), compared to the profiles observed in bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-vaccinated healthy individuals and patients with other pulmonary diseases (non-TB patients). To this end, plasma samples were collected from 151 TB patients including 68 pulmonary TB (PTB), 43 endobronchial TB, and 40 tuberculosis pleurisy (TP) patients, as well as 107 no-TB cases including 26 non-TB patients and 81 BCG-vaccinated healthy controls. A liquid array-based multiplexed immunoassay was used to screen plasma samples for 20 distinct cytokines and chemokines. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze associations between cytokines/chemokines and TB/non-TB patients. Compared to our findings with the no-TB donors, the median plasma levels of the proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines TNF-α, IL-6, IP-10, IFN-γ, and MIP-1β were significantly elevated in TB patients, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers for diagnosing TB patients. Further comparisons with healthy donors showed that only the median TNF-α plasma level was highly produced in the plasma of all 3 types of TB patients. Plasma IL-6 production was higher only in TP patients, while the plasma levels of IP-10, IFN-γ, and MIP-1β were markedly enhanced in both PTB and TP patients. Unexpectedly, among the above cytokines/chemokines, MIP-1β was also highly expressed in non-TB patients, compared with healthy donors. Our results suggested that TNF-α may be an ideal biomarker for diagnosing the 3 forms of TB presentation, while the other factors (IL-6, IP-10, MCP-1, and IFN-γ) can potentially facilitate differential diagnosis for the 3 TB presentation types. Further characterization of immune responses associated with different types of TB diseases will provide a basis for developing novel TB diagnostics.     

A novel human CC chemokine, eotaxin-3, which is expressed in IL-4-stimulated vascular endothelial cells, exhibits potent activity toward eosinophils.

IL-4 has been shown to be involved in the accumulation of leukocytes, especially eosinophils, at sites of inflammation by acting on vascular endothelial cells. To identify novel molecules involved in the IL-4-dependent eosinophil extravasation, cDNA prepared from HUVEC stimulated with IL-4 was subjected to differential display analysis, which revealed a novel CC chemokine designated as eotaxin-3. The human eotaxin-3 gene has been localized to chromosome 7q11.2, unlike most other CC chemokine genes. The predicted mature protein of 71 aa showed 27-42% identity to other human CC chemokines. The recombinant protein induced a transient increase in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration and in vitro chemotaxis on eosinophils. Furthermore, in cynomolgus monkeys, the accumulation of eosinophils was observed at the sites where the protein was injected. Eotaxin-3 inhibited the binding of 125I-eotaxin, but not 125I-macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, to eosinophils and acted on cell lines transfected with CCR-3, suggesting that eotaxin-3 recognized CCR-3. IL-13 as well as IL-4 up-regulated eotaxin-3 mRNA in HUVEC, whereas neither TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IFN-gamma, nor TNF-alpha plus IFN-gamma did. The expression profile of eotaxin-3 is different from those of eotaxin, RANTES, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-4, which are potent eosinophil-selective chemoattractants and are induced by either TNF-alpha or TNF-alpha plus IFN-gamma. These results suggest that eotaxin-3 may contribute to the eosinophil accumulation in atopic diseases.     

Intracellular Signaling by the Chemokine Receptor US28 during Human Cytomegalovirus Infection

In patients with impaired cell-mediated immune responses (e.g., lung transplant recipients and AIDS patients), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes severe disease such as pneumonitis. However, although immunocompetency in the host can protect from CMV disease, the virus persists by evading the host immune defenses. A model of CMV infection of the endothelium has been developed in which inflammatory stimuli, such as the CC chemokine RANTES, bind to the endothelial cell surface, stimulating calcium flux during late times of CMV infection. At 96 h postinfection, CMV-infected cells express mRNA of the CMV-encoded CC chemokine receptor US28 but do not express mRNA of other CC chemokine receptors that bind RANTES (CCR1, CCR4, CCR5). Cloning and stable expression of the receptor CMV US28 in human kidney epithelial cells (293 cells) with and without the heterotrimeric G protein α₁₆ indicated that CMV US28 couples to both Gα_i and Gα₁₆ proteins to activate calcium flux in response to the chemokines RANTES and MCP-3. Furthermore, cells that coexpress US28 and Gα₁₆ responded to RANTES stimulation with activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase, which could be attributed, in part, to specific Gα₁₆ coupling. Thus, through expression of the CC chemokine receptor US28, CMV may utilize resident G proteins of the infected cell to manipulate cellular responses stimulated by chemokines.     

Comprehensive mapping of poxvirus vCCI chemokine-binding protein. Expanded range of ligand interactions and unusual dissociation kinetics.

In compiling a comprehensive map of the ligand binding capacity of elements within the chemokine system, we have determined the spectrum of chemokines capable of interacting with the poxvirus-encoded viral CC chemokine inhibitor, vCCI. More than 80 chemokines were tested in parallel for their ability to displace radiolabeled signature chemokines from vCCI. Of these chemokines, 26 showed potential high affinity interactions. These interactions revealed an expanded spectrum of binding capacity for vCCI to now include molecules such as human myeloid progenitor inhibitory factor-1 as ligands. In addition, high affinity viral protein-protein interactions were revealed. For example, binding between poxvirus vCCI and the herpesvirus vMIP-II from HHV8 occurs with IC(50) approximately 10-50 nm. Unusual dissociation kinetics were observed between certain chemokines and vCCI. Notably, many ligands displayed a precipitous displacement profile, suggesting marked positive cooperativity of binding. Finally, heterologous competition provided evidence for overlapping but distinct binding sites for the many chemokines that bind to vCCI. The determination of the binding fingerprint and unusual binding interactions of vCCI with a large number of chemokines suggest a finely honed evolutionary strategy of chemokine sequestration during viral infection.     

CC类趋化因子亚家族与心肌梗死的研究进展

CC类趋化因子亚家族是趋化因子家族中成员最多、研究最广泛的一大类细胞因子,其主要功能参与炎症细胞激活、迁移、粘附等病理生理过程。大量研究表明,CC类趋化因子亚家族成员参与了心肌梗死后病理过程的各个阶段。其中研究最为深入的为单核细胞趋化蛋白-1（monocyte chemoattractant protein-1,MCP-1）及其受体CC趋化因子受体2（CC chemokine receptor 2,CCR2）,在心肌梗死后炎症期、增殖期及疤痕愈合期都发挥了重要作用从而影响梗死后心室重构。近年来,CC类趋化因子亚家族其他成员亦被逐渐揭示参与了心肌梗死的发展。本文结合以往大量文献将对CC类趋化因子亚家族在心肌梗死各个阶段中尤其是梗死后各期对于心室重构的影响进行综述,以期为今后的实验研究提供方向及疾病的预防和治疗提供药物靶点。     

The human CC chemokine MIP-1beta dimer is not competent to bind to the CCR5 receptor

Chemokine dimerization has been the subject of much interest in recent years as evidence has accumulated that different quaternary states of chemokines play different biological roles; the monomer is believed to be the receptor-binding unit, whereas the dimer has been implicated in binding cell surface glycosaminoglycans. However, although several studies have provided evidence for this paradigm by making monomeric chemokine variants or dimer-impaired chemokines, few have provided direct evidence of the receptor function of a chemokine dimer. We have produced a covalent dimer of the CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta (MIP-1beta) by placing a disulfide bond at the center of its dimer interface through a single amino acid substitution (MIP-1beta-A10C). This variant was shown to be a nondissociating dimer by SDS-PAGE and analytical ultracentrifugation. NMR reveals a structure largely the same as the wild type protein. In studies of glycosaminoglycan binding, MIP-1beta-A10C binds to a heparin-Sepharose column as tightly as the wild type protein and more tightly than monomeric variants. However, MIP-1beta-A10C neither binds nor activates the MIP-1beta receptor CCR5. It was found that the ability to activate CCR5 was recovered upon reduction of the intermolecular disulfide cross-link by incubation with 1 mm dithiothreitol. This work provides the first definitive evidence that the CC chemokine MIP-1beta dimer is not able to bind or activate its receptor and implicates the CC chemokine monomer as the sole receptor-interacting unit.     

Chemokine PARC Gene (SCYA18) Generated by Fusion of Two MIP-1α/LD78α-like Genes

Two loci in the human genome, chromosomes 4q12–q21 and 17q11.2, contain clusters of CXC and CC chemokine subfamily genes, respectively. Since mice appear to contain fewer chemokine genes than humans, numerous gene duplications might have occurred in each locus of the human genome. Here we describe the genomic organization of the human pulmonary and activation-regulated CC chemokine (PARC), also known as DC-CK1 and AMAC-1. Despite high sequence similarity to a CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α)/LD78α, PARC is chemotactic for lymphocytes and not for monocytes and does not share its receptor with MIP-1α. Analyses of the BAC clones containing the humanPARCgene indicated that the gene is located most closely toMIP-1α(HGMW-approved symbolSCYA3) andMIP-1β(HGMW-approved symbolSCYA4) on chromosome 17q11.2. Dot-plot comparison suggested that thePARCgene had been generated by fusion of twoMIP-1α-like genes with deletion and selective usage of exons. Base changes accumulated before and after the fusion might have adapted the gene to a new function. Since there are variably duplicated copies of theMIP-1αgene calledLD78β(HGMW-approved symbolSCYA3L) in the vicinity of theMIP-1αgene, the locus surrounding theMIP-1αgene seems to be a “hot spring” that continuously produces new family genes. This evidence provides a new model, duplication and fusion, of the molecular basis for diversity within a gene family.     

Probing the Role of CXC Motif in Chemokine CXCL8 for High Affinity Binding and Activation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 Receptors

All chemokines share a common structural scaffold that mediate a remarkable variety of functions from immune surveillance to organogenesis. Chemokines are classified as CXC or CC on the basis of conserved cysteines, and the two subclasses bind distinct sets of GPCR class of receptors and also have markedly different quaternary structures, suggesting that the CXC/CC motif plays a prominent role in both structure and function. For both classes, receptor activation involves interactions between chemokine N-loop and receptor N-domain residues (Site-I), and between chemokine N-terminal and receptor extracellular/transmembrane residues (Site-II). We engineered a CC variant (labeled as CC-CXCL8) of the chemokine CXCL8 by deleting residue X (CXC → CC), and found its structure is essentially similar to WT. In stark contrast, CC-CXCL8 bound poorly to its cognate receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 (K_i > 1 μm). Further, CC-CXCL8 failed to mobilize Ca²⁺ in CXCR2-expressing HL-60 cells or recruit neutrophils in a mouse lung model. However, most interestingly, CC-CXCL8 mobilizes Ca²⁺ in neutrophils and in CXCR1-expressing HL-60 cells. Compared with the WT, CC-CXCL8 binds CXCR1 N-domain with only ∼5-fold lower affinity indicating that the weak binding to intact CXCR1 must be due to its weak binding at Site-II. Nevertheless, this level of binding is sufficient for receptor activation indicating that affinity and activity are separable functions. We propose that the CXC motif functions as a conformational switch that couples Site-I and Site-II interactions for both receptors, and that this coupling is critical for high affinity binding but differentially regulates activation.     

Cell-Specific Expression of RANTES, MCP-1, and MIP-1α by Lower Airway Epithelial Cells and Eosinophils Infected with Respiratory Syncytial Virus

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major cause of acute bronchiolitis in infancy, a syndrome characterized by wheezing, respiratory distress, and the pathologic findings of peribronchial mononuclear cell infiltration and release of inflammatory mediators by basophil and eosinophil leukocytes. Composition and activation of this cellular response are thought to rely on the discrete target cell selectivity of C-C chemokines. We demonstrate that infection in vitro of human epithelial cells of the lower respiratory tract by RSV induced dose- and time-dependent increases in mRNA and protein secretion for RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and presumably secreted), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α). Production of MCP-1 and MIP-1α was selectively localized only in epithelial cells of the small airways and lung. Exposure of epithelial cells to gamma interferon (IFN-γ), in combination with RSV infection, induced a significant increase in RANTES production that was synergistic with respect to that obtained by RSV infection or IFN-γ treatment alone. Epithelial cell-derived chemokines exhibited a strong chemotactic activity for normal human blood eosinophils. Furthermore, eosinophils were susceptible to RSV and released RANTES and MIP-1α as a result of infection. Therefore, the inflammatory process in RSV-induced bronchiolitis appears to be triggered by the infection of epithelial cells and further amplified via mechanisms driven by IFN-γ and by the secretion of eosinophil chemokines.     

Novel chicken CXC and CC chemokines

Upon stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) the chicken macrophage cell line HD-11 secretes factors with cytokine activity. To characterize these molecules, representational difference analysis with RNA of LPS-induced and uninduced HD-11 cells was performed. Two cDNA clones were isolated that code for polypeptides with structural features of chemokines. cDNA K60 codes for a novel CXC chemokine of 104 residues including a putative signal peptide of 20 amino acids at the N-terminus. It is 67% identical to the previously cloned chicken chemokine 9E3/CEF4. K60 exhibits a similar degree of sequence identity to human interleukin 8 and other related CXC chemokines (about 50%), rendering straight-forward predictions of its biological properties difficult. cDNA K203 codes for a novel CC chemokine of 89 amino acids including a putative N-terminal signal peptide of 21 residues. It is 43% identical to a previously characterized chicken protein with homology to mammalian macrophage inflammatory protein 1beta (MIP-1beta). K203 exhibits about 50% sequence identity to human MIP-1beta and other related CC chemokines.     

Targeting Spare CC Chemokine Receptor 5 (CCR5) as a Principle to Inhibit HIV-1 Entry

CCR5 binds the chemokines CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5 and is the major coreceptor for HIV-1 entry into target cells. Chemokines are supposed to form a natural barrier against human immunodeficiency virus, type 1 (HIV-1) infection. However, we showed that their antiviral activity is limited by CCR5 adopting low-chemokine affinity conformations at the cell surface. Here, we investigated whether a pool of CCR5 that is not stabilized by chemokines could represent a target for inhibiting HIV infection. We exploited the characteristics of the chemokine analog PSC-RANTES (N-α-(n-nonanoyl)-des-Ser(1)-[l-thioprolyl(2), l-cyclohexylglycyl(3)]-RANTES(4-68)), which displays potent anti-HIV-1 activity. We show that native chemokines fail to prevent high-affinity binding of PSC-RANTES, analog-mediated calcium release (in desensitization assays), and analog-mediated CCR5 internalization. These results indicate that a pool of spare CCR5 may bind PSC-RANTES but not native chemokines. Improved recognition of CCR5 by PSC-RANTES may explain why the analog promotes higher amounts of β-arrestin 2·CCR5 complexes, thereby increasing CCR5 down-regulation and HIV-1 inhibition. Together, these results highlight that spare CCR5, which might permit HIV-1 to escape from chemokines, should be targeted for efficient viral blockade.