Transmembrane helices of membrane proteins may flex to satisfy hydrophobic mismatch

A novel mechanism for membrane modulation of transmembrane protein structure, and consequently function, is suggested in which mismatch between the hydrophobic surface of the protein and the hydrophobic interior of the lipid bilayer induces a flexing or bending of a transmembrane segment of the protein. Studies on model hydrophobic transmembrane peptides predict that helices tilt to submerge the hydrophobic surface within the lipid bilayer to satisfy the hydrophobic effect if the helix length exceeds the bilayer width. The hydrophobic surface of transmembrane helix 1 (TM1) of lactose permease, LacY, is accessible to the bilayer, and too long to be accommodated in the hydrophobic portion of a typical lipid bilayer if oriented perpendicular to the membrane surface. Hence, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data and molecular dynamics simulations show that TM1 from LacY may flex as well as tilt to satisfy the hydrophobic mismatch with the bilayer. In an analogous study of the hydrophobic mismatch of TM7 of bovine rhodopsin, similar flexing of the transmembrane segment near the conserved NPxxY sequence is observed. As a control, NMR data on TM5 of lacY, which is much shorter than TM1, show that TM5 is likely to tilt, but not flex, consistent with the close match between the extent of hydrophobic surface of the peptide and the hydrophobic thickness of the bilayer. These data suggest mechanisms by which the lipid bilayer in which the protein is embedded modulates conformation, and thus function, of integral membrane proteins through interactions with the hydrophobic transmembrane helices.     

Transmembrane helices of membrane proteins may flex to satisfy hydrophobic mismatch

A novel mechanism for membrane modulation of transmembrane protein structure, and consequently function, is suggested in which mismatch between the hydrophobic surface of the protein and the hydrophobic interior of the lipid bilayer induces a flexing or bending of a transmembrane segment of the protein. Studies on model hydrophobic transmembrane peptides predict that helices tilt to submerge the hydrophobic surface within the lipid bilayer to satisfy the hydrophobic effect if the helix length exceeds the bilayer width. The hydrophobic surface of transmembrane helix 1 (TM1) of lactose permease, LacY, is accessible to the bilayer, and too long to be accommodated in the hydrophobic portion of a typical lipid bilayer if oriented perpendicular to the membrane surface. Hence, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data and molecular dynamics simulations show that TM1 from LacY may flex as well as tilt to satisfy the hydrophobic mismatch with the bilayer. In an analogous study of the hydrophobic mismatch of TM7 of bovine rhodopsin, similar flexing of the transmembrane segment near the conserved NPxxY sequence is observed. As a control, NMR data on TM5 of lacY, which is much shorter than TM1, show that TM5 is likely to tilt, but not flex, consistent with the close match between the extent of hydrophobic surface of the peptide and the hydrophobic thickness of the bilayer. These data suggest mechanisms by which the lipid bilayer in which the protein is embedded modulates conformation, and thus function, of integral membrane proteins through interactions with the hydrophobic transmembrane helices.     

The determinants of hydrophobic mismatch response for transmembrane helices

Hydrophobic mismatch arises from a difference in the hydrophobic thickness of a lipid membrane and a transmembrane protein segment, and is thought to play an important role in the folding, stability and function of membrane proteins. We have investigated the possible adaptations that lipid bilayers and transmembrane α-helices undergo in response to mismatch, using fully-atomistic molecular dynamics simulations totaling 1.4 μs. We have created 25 different tryptophan-alanine-leucine transmembrane α-helical peptide systems, each composed of a hydrophobic alanine–leucine stretch, flanked by 1–4 tryptophan side chains, as well as the β-helical peptide dimer, gramicidin A. Membrane responses to mismatch include changes in local bilayer thickness and lipid order, varying systematically with peptide length. Adding more flanking tryptophan side chains led to an increase in bilayer thinning for negatively mismatched peptides, though it was also associated with a spreading of the bilayer interface. Peptide tilting, bending and stretching were systematic, with tilting dominating the responses, with values of up to ~ 45° for the most positively mismatched peptides. Peptide responses were modulated by the number of tryptophan side chains due to their anchoring roles and distributions around the helices. Potential of mean force calculations for local membrane thickness changes, helix tilting, bending and stretching revealed that membrane deformation is the least energetically costly of all mismatch responses, except for positively mismatched peptides where helix tilting also contributes substantially. This comparison of energetic driving forces of mismatch responses allows for deeper insight into protein stability and conformational changes in lipid membranes.     

The role of tryptophan side chains in membrane protein anchoring and hydrophobic mismatch

Tryptophan (Trp) is abundant in membrane proteins, preferentially residing near the lipid–water interface where it is thought to play a significant anchoring role. Using a total of 3 μs of molecular dynamics simulations for a library of hydrophobic WALP-like peptides, a long poly-Leu α-helix, and the methyl-indole analog, we explore the thermodynamics of the Trp movement in membranes that governs the stability and orientation of transmembrane protein segments. We examine the dominant hydrogen-bonding interactions between the Trp and lipid carbonyl and phosphate moieties, cation–π interactions to lipid choline moieties, and elucidate the contributions to the thermodynamics that serve to localize the Trp, by ~ 4 kcal/mol, near the membrane glycerol backbone region. We show a striking similarity between the free energy to move an isolated Trp side chain to that found from a wide range of WALP peptides, suggesting that the location of this side chain is nearly independent of the host transmembrane segment. Our calculations provide quantitative measures that explain Trp's role as a modulator of responses to hydrophobic mismatch, providing a deeper understanding of how lipid composition may control a range of membrane active peptides and proteins.     

Rhodopsin/Lipid Hydrophobic Matching—Rhodopsin Oligomerization and Function

Lipid composition of the membrane and rhodopsin packing density strongly modulate the early steps of the visual response of photoreceptor membranes. In this study, lipid-order and bovine rhodopsin function in proteoliposomes composed of the sn-1 chain perdeuterated lipids 14:0_d27-14:1-PC, 16:0_d31-16:1-PC, 18:0_d35-18:1-PC, or 20:0_d39-20:1-PC at rhodopsin/lipid molar ratios from 1:70 to 1:1000 (mol/mol) were investigated. Clear evidence for matching of hydrophobic regions on rhodopsin transmembrane helices and hydrophobic thickness of lipid bilayers was observed from ²H nuclear magnetic resonance order parameter measurements at low rhodopsin concentrations. Thin bilayers stretched to match the length of transmembrane helices observed as increase of sn-1 chain order, while thicker bilayers were compressed near the protein. A quantitative analysis of lipid-order parameter changes suggested that the protein adjusts its conformation to bilayer hydrophobic thickness as well, which confirmed our earlier circular-dichroism measurements. Changes in lipid order parameters upon rhodopsin incorporation vanished for bilayers with a hydrophobic thickness of 27 ± 1 Å, suggesting that this is the bilayer thickness at which rhodopsin packs in bilayers at the lowest membrane perturbation. The lipid-order parameter studies also indicated that a hydrophobic mismatch between rhodopsin and lipids triggers rhodopsin oligomerization with increasing rhodopsin concentrations. Both hydrophobic mismatch and rhodopsin oligomerization result in substantial shifts of the equilibrium between the photointermediates metarhodopsin I and metarhodopsin II; increasing bilayer thickness favors formation of metarhodopsin II while oligomerization favors metarhodopsin I. The results highlight the importance of hydrophobic matching for rhodopsin structure, oligomerization, and function.     

Protein modulation of lipids, and vice-versa, in membranes

This review describes: (i) perturbations of the membrane lipids that are induced by integral membrane proteins, and reciprocally, (ii) the effects that the lipids may have on the function of membrane-associated proteins. Topics of the first category that are covered include: stoichiometry and selectivity of the first shell of lipids associated at the intramembranous perimeter of transmembrane proteins; the chain configuration and exchange rates of the first-shell lipids; the effects of transmembrane peptides on transbilayer movement of lipids (flip-flop); the effects of membrane proteins on lipid polymorphism and formation of non-lamellar phases; and the effects of hydrophobic mismatch on lipid chain configuration, phase stability and selectivity of lipid-protein association. Topics of the second category are: the influence of lipid selectivity on conformational changes in the protein; the effects of elastic fluctuations of the lipid bilayer on protein insertion and orientation in membranes; the effects of hydrophobic matching on intramembrane protein-protein association; and the effects of intrinsic lipid curvature on membrane integration, oligomer formation and activity of membrane proteins.     

Lipid dependence of membrane anchoring properties and snorkeling behavior of aromatic and charged residues in transmembrane peptides

31P NMR spectroscopy was used to investigate the effects of transmembrane alpha-helical peptides with different flanking residues on the phase behavior of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylethanolamine/phosphatidylglycerol (molar ratio 7:3) model membranes. It was found that tryptophan-flanked (WALP) peptides and lysine-flanked (KALP) peptides both promote formation of nonlamellar phases in these lipid systems in a mismatch-dependent manner. Based on this mismatch dependence, it was concluded that the effective hydrophobic length of KALP peptides is considerably shorter than that of the corresponding WALP peptides. Peptides with other positively charged residues showed very similar effects as KALP. The results suggest that the peptides have a well-defined effective hydrophobic length, which is different for charged and aromatic flanking residues, but which is independent of the precise chemical nature of the side chain. Strikingly, the effective length of KALP peptides in the lipid systems investigated here is much smaller than that previously found for the same peptides in phosphatidylcholine. This suggests that snorkeling of lysine side chains, as proposed to occur in phosphatidylcholine, does not occur in lipid systems that are prone to form nonlamellar phases by themselves. This suggestion was supported by using peptides with shortened lysine side chains and by investigating the effects of mixtures of WALP and KALP peptides. The lipid dependency of the snorkeling behavior is explained by considering the free energy cost of snorkeling in relation to the free energy cost of the formation of nonlamellar phases.     

Revisiting Hydrophobic Mismatch with Free Energy Simulation Studies of Transmembrane Helix Tilt and Rotation

Protein-lipid interaction and bilayer regulation of membrane protein functions are largely controlled by the hydrophobic match between the transmembrane (TM) domain of membrane proteins and the surrounding lipid bilayer. To systematically characterize responses of a TM helix and lipid adaptations to a hydrophobic mismatch, we have performed a total of 5.8-μs umbrella sampling simulations and calculated the potentials of mean force (PMFs) as a function of TM helix tilt angle under various mismatch conditions. Single-pass TM peptides called WALPn (n = 16, 19, 23, and 27) were used in two lipid bilayers with different hydrophobic thicknesses to consider hydrophobic mismatch caused by either the TM length or the bilayer thickness. In addition, different flanking residues, such as alanine, lysine, and arginine, instead of tryptophan in WALP23 were used to examine their influence. The PMFs, their decomposition, and trajectory analysis demonstrate that 1), tilting of a single-pass TM helix is the major response to a hydrophobic mismatch; 2), TM helix tilting up to ∼10° is inherent due to the intrinsic entropic contribution arising from helix precession around the membrane normal even under a negative mismatch; 3), the favorable helix-lipid interaction provides additional driving forces for TM helix tilting under a positive mismatch; 4), the minimum-PMF tilt angle is generally located where there is the hydrophobic match and little lipid perturbation; 5), TM helix rotation is dependent on the specific helix-lipid interaction; and 6), anchoring residues at the hydrophilic/hydrophobic interface can be an important determinant of TM helix orientation.     

Molecular theory of lipid-protein interaction and the Lalpha-HII transition.

We present a molecular-level theory for lipid-protein interaction and apply it to the study of lipid-mediated interactions between proteins and the protein-induced transition from the planar bilayer (Lalpha) to the inverse-hexagonal (HII) phase. The proteins are treated as rigid, membrane-spanning, hydrophobic inclusions of different size and shape, e.g., "cylinder-like," "barrel-like," or "vase-like." We assume strong hydrophobic coupling between the protein and its neighbor lipids. This means that, if necessary, the flexible lipid chains surrounding the protein will stretch, compress, and/or tilt to bridge the hydrophobic thickness mismatch between the protein and the unperturbed bilayer. The system free energy is expressed as an integral over local molecular contributions, the latter accounting for interheadgroup repulsion, hydrocarbon-water surface energy, and chain stretching-tilting effects. We show that the molecular interaction constants are intimately related to familiar elastic (continuum) characteristics of the membrane, such as the bending rigidity and spontaneous curvature, as well as to the less familiar tilt modulus. The equilibrium configuration of the membrane is determined by minimizing the free energy functional, subject to boundary conditions dictated by the size, shape, and spatial distribution of inclusions. A similar procedure is used to calculate the free energy and structure of peptide-free and peptide-rich hexagonal phases. Two degrees of freedom are involved in the variational minimization procedure: the local length and local tilt angle of the lipid chains. The inclusion of chain tilt is particularly important for studying noncylindrical (for instance, barrel-like) inclusions and analyzing the structure of the HII lipid phase; e.g., we find that chain tilt relaxation implies strong faceting of the lipid monolayers in the hexagonal phase. Consistent with experiment, we find that only short peptides (large negative mismatch) can induce the Lalpha --> HII transition. At the transition, a peptide-poor Lalpha phase coexists with a peptide-rich HII phase.     

Self-association of transmembrane alpha-helices in model membranes: importance of helix orientation and role of hydrophobic mismatch

Interactions between transmembrane helices play a key role in almost all cellular processes involving membrane proteins. We have investigated helix-helix interactions in lipid bilayers with synthetic tryptophan-flanked peptides that mimic the membrane spanning parts of membrane proteins. The peptides were functionalized with pyrene to allow the self-association of the helices to be monitored by pyrene fluorescence and Trp-pyrene fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Specific labeling of peptides at either their N or C terminus has shown that helix-helix association occurs almost exclusively between antiparallel helices. Furthermore, computer modeling suggested that antiparallel association arises primarily from the electrostatic interactions between alpha-helix backbone atoms. We propose that such interactions may provide a force for the preferentially antiparallel association of helices in polytopic membrane proteins. Helix-helix association was also found to depend on the lipid environment. In bilayers of dioleoylphosphatidylcholine, in which the hydrophobic length of the peptides approximately matched the bilayer thickness, association between the helices was found to require peptide/lipid ratios exceeding 1/25. Self-association of the helices was promoted by either increasing or decreasing the bilayer thickness, and by adding cholesterol. These results indicate that helix-helix association in membrane proteins can be promoted by unfavorable protein-lipid interactions.     

Effect of sequence hydrophobicity and bilayer width upon the minimum length required for the formation of transmembrane helices in membranes

The minimum hydrophobic length necessary to form a transmembrane (TM) helix in membranes was investigated using model membrane-inserted hydrophobic helices. The fluorescence of a Trp at the center of the sequence and its sensitivity to quenching were used to ascertain helix position within the membrane. Peptides with hydrophobic cores composed of poly(Leu) were compared to sequences containing a poly 1:1 Leu:Ala core (which have a hydrophobicity typical of natural TM helices). Studies varying bilayer width revealed that the poly(Leu) core peptides predominately formed a TM state when the bilayer width exceeded hydrophobic sequence length by (i.e. when negative mismatch was) up to ∼ 11-12 Å (e.g. the case of a 11-12 residue hydrophobic sequence in bilayers with a biologically relevant width, i.e. dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC) bilayers), while poly(LeuAla) core peptides formed predominantly TM state with negative mismatch of up to 9 Å (a 13 residue hydrophobic sequence in DOPC bilayers). This indicates that minimum length necessary to form a predominating amount of a TM state (minimum TM length) is only modestly hydrophobicity-dependent for the sequences studied here, and a formula that defines the minimum TM length as a function of hydrophobicity for moderately-to-highly hydrophobic sequences was derived. The minimum length able to form a stable TM helix for alternating LeuAla sequences, and that for sequences with a Leu block followed by an Ala block, was similar, suggesting that a hydrophobicity gradient along the sequence may not be an important factor in TM stability. TM stability was also similar for sequences flanked by different charged ionizable residues (Lys, His, Asp). However, ionizable flanking residues destabilized the TM configuration much more when charged than when uncharged. The ability of short hydrophobic sequences to form TM helices in membranes in the presence of substantial negative mismatch implies that lipid bilayers have a considerable ability to adjust to negative mismatch, and that short TM helices may be more common than generally believed. Factors that modulate the ability of bilayers to adjust to mismatch may strongly affect the configuration of short hydrophobic helices.     

Hydrophobic organization of α-helix membrane bundle in bacteriorhodopsin

The hydrophobic organization of the intramembraneα-helical bundle in bacteriorhodopsin (BRh) was assessed based on a new approach to characterization of spatial hydrophobic properties of transmembrane (TM)α-helical peptides. The method employs two independent techniques: Monte Carlo simulations of nonpolar solvent around TM peptides and analysis of molecular hydrophobicity potential on their surfaces. The results obtained by the two methods agree with each other and permit precise hydrophobicity mapping of TM peptides. Superimposition of such data on the experimentally derived spatial model of the membrane moiety together with 2D maps of hydrophobic hydrophilic contacts provide considerable insight into the hydrophobic organization of BRh. The helix bundle is stabilized to a large extent by hydrophobic interactions between helices—neighbors in the sequence of BRh, by long-range interactions in helix pairs C-E, C-F, and C-G, and by nonpolar contracts between retinal and helices C, D, E, F. Unlike globular proteins, no polar contacts between residues distantly separated in the sequence of BRh were found in the bundle. One of the most striking results of this study is the finding that the hydrophobic organization of BRh is significantly different from those in bacterial photoreaction centers. Thus, TMα-helices in BRh expose their most nonpolar sides to the bilayer as well as to the neighboring helices and to the interior of the bundle. Some of them contact lipids with their relatively hydrophilic surfaces. No correlation was found between disposition of the most hydrophobic and the most variable sides of the TM helices.     

Lipid dynamics in fast-tumbling bicelles with varying bilayer thickness: Effect of model transmembrane peptides

The morphology of q = 0.5 fast-tumbling bicelles prepared with three different acyl chain lengths has been investigated by NMR. It is shown that bicelles prepared with DLPC (12 C) and DHPC are on average larger than those containing DMPC or DPPC (14 and 16 C) and DHPC, which may be due to a higher degree of mixing between DLPC and DHPC. The fast internal mobility of the lipids was determined from natural abundance carbon-13 relaxation. A similar dynamical behaviour of the phospholipids in the three different bicelles was observed, although the DPPC lipid acyl chain displayed a somewhat lower degree of mobility, as evidenced by higher generalized order parameters throughout the acyl chain. Carbon-13 relaxation was also used to determine the effect of different model transmembrane peptides, with flanking Lys residues, on the lipid dynamics in the three different bicelles. All peptides had the effect of increasing the order parameters for the DLPC lipid, while no effect was observed on the longer lipid chains. This effect may be explained by a mismatch between the hydrophobic length of the peptides and the DLPC lipid acyl chain.     

Hydrophobic mismatch is a key factor in protein transport across lipid bilayer membranes via the Tat pathway

The twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway transports folded proteins across membranes in bacteria, thylakoids, plant mitochondria, and archaea. In most species, the active Tat machinery consists of three independent subunits: TatA, TatB, and TatC. TatA and TatB possess short transmembrane alpha helices (TMHs), both of which are only 15 residues long in Escherichia coli. Such short TMHs cause a hydrophobic mismatch between Tat subunits and the membrane bilayer, although the functional significance of this mismatch is unclear. Here, we sought to address the functional importance of the hydrophobic mismatch in the Tat transport mechanism in E. coli. We conducted three different assays to evaluate the effect of TMH length mutants on Tat activity and observed that the TMHs of TatA and TatB appear to be evolutionarily tuned to 15 amino acids, with activity dropping off following any modification of this length. Surprisingly, TatA and TatB with as few as 11 residues in their TMHs can still insert into the membrane bilayer, albeit with a decline in membrane integrity. These findings support a model of Tat transport utilizing localized toroidal pores that form when the membrane bilayer is thinned to a critical threshold. In this context, we conclude that the 15-residue length of the TatA and TatB TMHs can be seen as a compromise between the need for some hydrophobic mismatch to allow the membrane to reversibly reach the threshold thinness required for toroidal pore formation and the permanently destabilizing effect of placing even shorter helices into these energy-transducing membranes.     

Hydrophobic mismatch of mobile transmembrane helices: Merging theory and experiments

Hydrophobic mismatch still represents a puzzle for transmembrane peptides, despite the apparent simplicity of this concept and its demonstrated validity in natural membranes. Using a wealth of available experimental ((2))H NMR data, we provide here a comprehensive explanation of the orientation and dynamics of model peptides in lipid bilayers, which shows how they can adapt to membranes of different thickness. The orientational adjustment of transmembrane α-helices can be understood as the result of a competition between the thermodynamically unfavorable lipid repacking associated with peptide tilting and the optimization of peptide/membrane hydrophobic coupling. In the positive mismatch regime (long-peptide/thin-membrane) the helices adapt mainly via changing their tilt angle, as expected from simple geometrical predictions. However, the adaptation mechanism varies with the peptide sequence in the flanking regions, suggesting additional effects that modulate hydrophobic coupling. These originate from re-adjustments of the peptide hydrophobic length and they depend on the hydrophobicity of the flanking region, the strength of interfacial anchoring, the structural flexibility of anchoring side-chains and the presence of alternative anchoring residues.     

The energetics of transmembrane helix insertion into a lipid bilayer

Free energy profiles for insertion of a hydrophobic transmembrane protein α-helix (M2 from CFTR) into a lipid bilayer have been calculated using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations and umbrella sampling to yield potentials of mean force along a reaction path corresponding to translation of a helix across a lipid bilayer. The calculated free energy of insertion is smaller when a bilayer with a thinner hydrophobic region is used. The free energies of insertion from the potentials of mean force are compared with those derived from a number of hydrophobicity scales and with those derived from translocon-mediated insertion. This comparison supports recent models of translocon-mediated insertion and in particular suggests that: 1), helices in an about-to-be-inserted state may be located in a hydrophobic region somewhat thinner than the core of a lipid bilayer; and/or 2), helices in a not-to-be-inserted state may experience an environment more akin (e.g., in polarity/hydrophobicity) to the bilayer/water interface than to bulk water.     

Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing

The packing structures of transmembrane helices are traditionally attributed to patterns in residues along the contact surface. In this view, besides keeping the helices confined in the membrane, the bilayer has only a minor effect on the helices structure. Here, we use two different approaches to show that the lipid environment has a crucial effect in determining the cross-angle distribution of packed helices. We analyzed structural data of a membrane proteins database. We show that the distribution of cross angles of helix pairs in this database is statistically indistinguishable from the cross-angle distribution of two noninteracting helices imbedded in the membrane. These results suggest that the cross angle is, to a large extent, determined by the tilt angle of the individual helices. We test this hypothesis using molecular simulations of a coarse-grained model that contains no specific residue interactions. These simulations reproduce the same cross-angle distribution as found in the database. As the tilt angle of a helix is dominated by hydrophobic mismatch between the protein and surrounding lipids, our results indicate that hydrophobic mismatch is the dominant factor guiding the transmembrane helix packing. Other short-range forces might then fine-tune the structure to its final configuration.     

Assembly of the M2 Tetramer Is Strongly Modulated by Lipid Chain Length

The influenza virus matrix protein 2 (M2) assembles into a tetramer in the host membrane during viral uncoating and maturation. It has been used as a model system to understand the relative contributions of protein-lipid and protein-protein interactions to membrane protein structure and association. Here we investigate the effect of lipid chain length on the association of the M2 transmembrane domain into tetramers using Förster resonance energy transfer. We observe that the interactions between the M2 helices are much stronger in 1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine than in 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine bilayers. Thus, lipid chain length and bilayer thickness not only modulate peptide interactions, but could also be a major determinant of the association of transmembrane helices into functional membrane protein oligomers.     

Lipid-protein interactions in biological membranes: a structural perspective

Lipid molecules bound to membrane proteins are resolved in some high-resolution structures of membrane proteins. An analysis of these structures provides a framework within which to analyse the nature of lipid-protein interactions within membranes. Membrane proteins are surrounded by a shell or annulus of lipid molecules, equivalent to the solvent layer surrounding a water-soluble protein. The lipid bilayer extends right up to the membrane protein, with a uniform thickness around the protein. The surface of a membrane protein contains many shallow grooves and protrusions to which the fatty acyl chains of the surrounding lipids conform to provide tight packing into the membrane. An individual lipid molecule will remain in the annular shell around a protein for only a short period of time. Binding to the annular shell shows relatively little structural specificity. As well as the annular lipid, there is evidence for other lipid molecules bound between the transmembrane α-helices of the protein; these lipids are referred to as non-annular lipids. The average thickness of the hydrophobic domain of a membrane protein is about 29 Å, with a few proteins having significantly smaller or greater thicknesses than the average. Hydrophobic mismatch between a membrane protein and the surrounding lipid bilayer generally leads to only small changes in membrane thickness. Possible adaptations in the protein to minimise mismatch include tilting of the helices and rotation of side chains at the ends of the helices. Packing of transmembrane α-helices is dependent on the chain length of the surrounding phospholipids. The function of membrane proteins is dependent on the thickness of the surrounding lipid bilayer, sometimes on the presence of specific, usually anionic, phospholipids, and sometimes on the phase of the phospholipid.     

Phospholipid flip-flop modulated by transmembrane peptides WALP and melittin

Select transmembrane proteins found in biogenic membranes are known to facilitate rapid bidirectional flip-flop of lipids between the membrane leaflets, while others have no little or no effect. The particular characteristics which determine the extent to which a protein will facilitate flip-flop are still unknown. To determine if the relative polarity of the transmembrane protein segment influences its capacity for facilitation of flip-flop, we have studied lipid flip-flop dynamics for bilayers containing the peptides WALP₂₃ and melittin. WALP₂₃ is used as a model hydrophobic peptide, while melittin consists of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues. Sum-frequency vibrational spectroscopy (SFVS) was used to characterize the bilayers and determine the kinetics of flip-flop for the lipid component, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), within the mixed bilayers. The kinetic data were utilized to determine the activation thermodynamics for DSPC flip-flop in the presence of the peptides. Melittin was found to significantly reduce the free energy barrier to DSPC flip-flop when incorporated into the bilayer at 1 mol.%, while incorporation of WALP₂₃ at the same concentration led to a more modest reduction of the free energy barrier. The possible mechanisms by which these peptides facilitate flip-flop are analyzed and discussed in terms of the observed activation thermodynamics.