Binding of human SLBP on the 3'-UTR of histone precursor H4-12 mRNA induces structural rearrangements that enable U7 snRNA anchoring

In metazoans, cell-cycle-dependent histones are produced from poly(A)-lacking mRNAs. The 3′ end of histone mRNAs is formed by an endonucleolytic cleavage of longer precursors between a conserved stem–loop structure and a purine-rich histone downstream element (HDE). The cleavage requires at least two trans-acting factors: the stem–loop binding protein (SLBP), which binds to the stem–loop and the U7 snRNP, which anchors to histone pre-mRNAs by annealing to the HDE. Using RNA structure-probing techniques, we determined the secondary structure of the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of mouse histone pre-mRNAs H4–12, H1t and H2a–614. Surprisingly, the HDE is embedded in hairpin structures and is therefore not easily accessible for U7 snRNP anchoring. Probing of the 3′-UTR in complex with SLBP revealed structural rearrangements leading to an overall opening of the structure especially at the level of the HDE. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that the SLBP-induced opening of HDE actually facilitates U7 snRNA anchoring on the histone H4–12 pre-mRNAs 3′ end. These results suggest that initial binding of the SLBP functions in making the HDE more accessible for U7 snRNA anchoring.     

Climbing the vertebrate branch of U1A/U2B″ protein evolution

In the vertebrate lineage of the U1A/U2B″/SNF protein family, the U1A and U2B″ proteins bind to RNA stem–loops in the U1 or U2 snRNPs, respectively. However, their specialization is fairly recent, as they evolved from a single ancestral protein. The progress of their specialization (subfunctionalization) can be monitored by the amino acid sequence changes that give rise to their modern RNA-binding specificity. Using ancestral sequence reconstruction to predict the intermediates on the evolutionary branch, a probable path of sequential changes is defined for U1A and U2B″. The RNA-binding affinity for U1A/U2B″ protein ancestors was measured using modern U1 and U2 snRNA stem–loops and RNA stem–loop variants to understand how the proteins’ RNA specificities evolved.     

Synthetic Lethality of Yeast slt Mutations with U2 Small Nuclear RNA Mutations Suggests Functional Interactions between U2 and U5 snRNPs That Are Important for Both Steps of Pre-mRNA Splicing

A genetic screen was devised to identify Saccharomyces cerevisiae splicing factors that are important for the function of the 5′ end of U2 snRNA. Six slt (stands for synthetic lethality with U2) mutants were isolated on the basis of synthetic lethality with a U2 snRNA mutation that perturbs the U2-U6 snRNA helix II interaction. SLT11 encodes a new splicing factor and SLT22 encodes a new RNA-dependent ATPase RNA helicase (D. Xu, S. Nouraini, D. Field, S. J. Tang, and J. D. Friesen, Nature 381:709–713, 1996). The remaining four slt mutations are new alleles of previously identified splicing genes: slt15, previously identified as prp17 (slt15/prp17-100), slt16/smd3-1, slt17/slu7-100, and slt21/prp8-21. slt11-1 and slt22-1 are synthetically lethal with mutations in the 3′ end of U6 snRNA, a region that affects U2-U6 snRNA helix II; however, slt17/slu7-100 and slt21/prp8-21 are not. This difference suggests that the latter two factors are unlikely to be involved in interactions with U2-U6 snRNA helix II but rather are specific to interactions with U2 snRNA. Pairwise synthetic lethality was observed among slt11-1 (which affects the first step of splicing) and several second-step factors, including slt15/prp17-100, slt17/slu7-100, and prp16-1. Mutations in loop 1 of U5 snRNA, a region that is implicated in the alignment of the two exons, are synthetically lethal with slu4/prp17-2 and slu7-1 (D. Frank, B. Patterson, and C. Guthrie, Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:5179–5205, 1992), as well as with slt11-1, slt15/prp17-100, slt17/slu7-100, and slt21/prp8-21. These same U5 snRNA mutations also interact genetically with certain U2 snRNA mutations that lie in the helix I and helix II regions of the U2-U6 snRNA structure. Our results suggest interactions among U2 snRNA, U5 snRNA, and Slt protein factors that may be responsible for coupling and coordination of the two reactions of pre-mRNA splicing.     

Investigation of a conserved stacking interaction in target site recognition by the U1A protein

Three highly conserved aromatic residues in RNA recognition motifs (RRM) participate in stacking interactions with RNA bases upon binding RNA. We have investigated the contribution of one of these aromatic residues, Phe56, to the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the spliceosomal protein U1A and stem–loop 2 of U1 snRNA. Previous work showed that the aromatic group is important for high affinity binding. Here we probe how mutation of Phe56 affects the kinetics of complex dissociation, the strength of the hydrogen bonds formed between U1A and the base that stacks with Phe56 (A6) and specific target site recognition. Substitution of Phe56 with Trp or Tyr increased the rate of dissociation of the complex, consistent with previously reported results. However, substitution of Phe56 with His decreased the rate of complex association, implying a change in the initial formation of the complex. Simultaneous modification of residue 56 and A6 revealed energetic coupling between the aromatic group and the functional groups of A6 that hydrogen bond to U1A. Finally, mutation of Phe56 to Leu reduced the ability of U1A to recognize stem–loop 2 correctly. Taken together, these experiments suggest that Phe56 contributes to binding affinity by stacking with A6 and participating in networks of energetically coupled interactions that enable this conserved aromatic amino acid to play a complex role in target site recognition.     

Proximity of the U12 snRNA with both the 5' splice site and the branch point during early stages of spliceosome assembly

U12 snRNA is required for branch point recognition in the U12-dependent spliceosome. Using site-specific cross-linking, we have captured an unexpected interaction between the 5' end of the U12 snRNA and the -2 position upstream of the 5' splice site of P120 and SCN4a splicing substrates. The U12 snRNA nucleotides that contact the 5' exon are the same ones that form the catalytically important helix Ib with U6atac snRNA in the spliceosome catalytic core. However, the U12/5' exon interaction is transient, occurring prior to the entry of the U4atac/U6atac.U5 tri-snRNP to the spliceosome. This suggests that the helix Ib region of U12 snRNA is positioned near the 5' splice site early during spliceosome assembly and only later interacts with U6atac to form helix Ib. We also provide evidence that U12 snRNA can simultaneously interact with 5' exon sequences near 5' splice site and the branch point sequence, suggesting that the 5' splice site and branch point sequences are separated by <40 to 50 A in the complex A of the U12-dependent spliceosome. Thus, no major rearrangements are subsequently needed to position these sites for the first step of catalysis.     

Limited complementarity between U1 snRNA and a retroviral 5′ splice site permits its attenuation via RNA secondary structure

Multiple types of regulation are used by cells and viruses to control alternative splicing. In murine leukemia virus, accessibility of the 5′ splice site (ss) is regulated by an upstream region, which can fold into a complex RNA stem–loop structure. The underlying sequence of the structure itself is negligible, since most of it could be functionally replaced by a simple heterologous RNA stem–loop preserving the wild-type splicing pattern. Increasing the RNA duplex formation between U1 snRNA and the 5′ss by a compensatory mutation in position +6 led to enhanced splicing. Interestingly, this mutation affects splicing only in the context of the secondary structure, arguing for a dynamic interplay between structure and primary 5′ss sequence. The reduced 5′ss accessibility could also be counteracted by recruiting a splicing enhancer domain via a modified MS2 phage coat protein to a single binding site at the tip of the simple RNA stem–loop. The mechanism of 5′ss attenuation was revealed using hyperstable U1 snRNA mutants, showing that restricted U1 snRNP access is the cause of retroviral alternative splicing.     

Remodeling of U2-U6 snRNA helix I during pre-mRNA splicing by Prp16 and the NineTeen Complex protein Cwc2

Removal of intron regions from pre-messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) requires spliceosome assembly with pre-mRNA, then subsequent spliceosome remodeling to allow activation for the two steps of intron removal. Spliceosome remodeling is carried out through the action of DExD/H-box ATPases that modulate RNA–RNA and protein–RNA interactions. The ATPase Prp16 remodels the spliceosome between the first and second steps of splicing by catalyzing release of first step factors Yju2 and Cwc25 as well as destabilizing U2-U6 snRNA helix I. How Prp16 destabilizes U2-U6 helix I is not clear. We show that the NineTeen Complex (NTC) protein Cwc2 displays genetic interactions with the U6 ACAGAGA, the U6 internal stem loop (ISL) and the U2-U6 helix I, all RNA elements that form the spliceosome active site. We find that one function of Cwc2 is to stabilize U2-U6 snRNA helix I during splicing. Cwc2 also functionally cooperates with the NTC protein Isy1/NTC30. Mutation in Cwc2 can suppress the cold sensitive phenotype of the prp16-302 mutation indicating a functional link between Cwc2 and Prp16. Specifically the prp16-302 mutation in Prp16 stabilizes Cwc2 interactions with U6 snRNA and destabilizes Cwc2 interactions with pre-mRNA, indicating antagonistic functions of Cwc2 and Prp16. We propose that Cwc2 is a target for Prp16-mediated spliceosome remodeling during pre-mRNA splicing.     

Identification of antisense RNA stem–loops that inhibit RNA–protein interactions using a bacterial reporter system

Many well-characterized examples of antisense RNAs from prokaryotic systems involve hybridization of the looped regions of stem–loop RNAs, presumably due to the high thermodynamic stability of the resulting loop–loop and loop–linear interactions. In this study, the identification of RNA stem–loops that inhibit U1A protein binding to the hpII RNA through RNA–RNA interactions was attempted using a bacterial reporter system based on phage λ N-mediated antitermination. As a result, loop sequences possessing 7–8 base complementarity to the 5′ region of the boxA element important for functional antitermination complex formation, but not the U1 hpII loop, were identified. In vitro and in vivo mutational analysis strongly suggested that the selected loop sequences were binding to the boxA region, and that the structure of the antisense stem–loop was important for optimal inhibitory activity. Next, in an attempt to demonstrate the ability to inhibit the interaction between the U1A protein and the hpII RNA, the rational design of an RNA stem–loop that inhibits U1A-binding to a modified hpII was carried out. Moderate inhibitory activity was observed, showing that it is possible to design and select antisense RNA stem–loops that disrupt various types of RNA–protein interactions.     

Structural elements in the internal ribosome entry site of Plautia stali intestine virus responsible for binding with ribosomes

Plautia stali intestine virus (PSIV) has an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) at the intergenic region of the genome. The PSIV IRES initiates translation with glutamine rather than the universal methionine. To analyze the mechanism of IRES-mediated initiation, binding of IRES RNA to salt-washed ribosomes in the absence of translation factors was studied. Among the three pseudoknots (PKs I, II and III) within the IRES, PK III was the most important for ribosome binding. Chemical footprint analyses showed that the loop parts of the two stem–loop structures in Domain 2, which are highly conserved in related viruses, are protected by 40S but not by 60S ribosomes. Because PK III is close to the two loops, these structural elements were considered to be important for binding of the 40S subunit. Competitive binding analyses showed that the IRES RNA does not bind poly(U)-programmed ribosomes preincubated with tRNA^Phe or its anticodon stem– loop (ASL) fragment. However, Domain 3-deleted IRES bound to programmed ribosomes preincubated with the ASL, suggesting that Domains 1 and 2 have roles in IRES binding to 40S subunits and that Domain 3 is located at the ribosome decoding site.     

Domains of human U4atac snRNA required for U12-dependent splicing in vivo

U4atac snRNA forms a base-paired complex with U6atac snRNA. Both snRNAs are required for the splicing of the minor U12-dependent class of eukaryotic nuclear introns. We have developed a new genetic suppression assay to investigate the in vivo roles of several regions of U4atac snRNA in U12-dependent splicing. We show that both the stem I and stem II regions, which have been proposed to pair with U6atac snRNA, are required for in vivo splicing. Splicing activity also requires U4atac sequences in the 5' stem-loop element that bind a 15.5 kDa protein that also binds to a similar region of U4 snRNA. In contrast, mutations in the region immediately following the stem I interaction region, as well as a deletion of the distal portion of the 3' stem-loop element, were active for splicing. Complete deletion of the 3' stem-loop element abolished in vivo splicing function as did a mutation of the Sm protein binding site. These results show that the in vivo sequence requirements of U4atac snRNA are similar to those described previously for U4 snRNA using in vitro assays and provide experimental support for models of the U4atac/U6atac snRNA interaction.     

Interactions of the yeast U6 RNA with the pre-mRNA branch site.

The small nuclear RNA (snRNA) components of the spliceosome have been proposed to catalyze the excision of introns from nuclear pre-mRNAs. If this hypothesis is correct, then the snRNA components of the spliceosome may interact directly with the reactive groups of pre-mRNA substrates. To explore this possibility, a genetic screen has been used to identify potential interactions between the U6 RNA and the pre-mRNA branch site. Notably, the selection yielded mutants in two regions of the yeast U6 RNA implicated previously in the catalytic events of splicing. These mutants significantly increase the splicing of pre-mRNA substrates containing non-adenosine branch sites. U6 mutants in U2/U6 helix Ia show strong allele-specific interactions with the branch site nucleotide and interact with PRP16, a factor implicated previously in branch site utilization. The other mutants cluster in the intramolecular helix of U6 and suppress the effects of branch site mutations in a nonallele-specific fashion. The locations of these mutants may define positions important for binding of the U6 intramolecular helix to the catalytic core of the spliceosome.     

RNA stem–loop enhanced expression of previously non-expressible genes

The key step in bacterial translation is formation of the pre-initiation complex. This requires initial contacts between mRNA, fMet-tRNA and the 30S subunit of the ribosome, steps that limit the initiation of translation. Here we report a method for improving translational initiation, which allows expression of several previously non-expressible genes. This method has potential applications in heterologous protein synthesis and high-throughput expression systems. We introduced a synthetic RNA stem–loop (stem length, 7 bp; ΔG₀ = –9.9 kcal/mol) in front of various gene sequences. In each case, the stem–loop was inserted 15 nt downstream from the start codon. Insertion of the stem–loop allowed in vitro expression of five previously non-expressible genes and enhanced the expression of all other genes investigated. Analysis of the RNA structure proved that the stem–loop was formed in vitro, and demonstrated that stabilization of the ribosome binding site is due to stem–loop introduction. By theoretical RNA structure analysis we showed that the inserted RNA stem–loop suppresses long-range interactions between the translation initiation domain and gene-specific mRNA sequences. Thus the inserted RNA stem–loop supports the formation of a separate translational initiation domain, which is more accessible to ribosome binding.     

Invariant U2 RNA sequences bordering the branchpoint recognition region are essential for interaction with yeast SF3a and SF3b subunits.

U2 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) contains a sequence (GUAGUA) that pairs with the intron branchpoint during splicing. This sequence is contained within a longer invariant sequence of unknown secondary structure and function that extends between U2 and I and stem IIa. A part of this region has been proposed to pair with U6 in a structure called helix III. We made mutations to test the function of these nucleotides in yeast U2 snRNA. Most single base changes cause no obvious growth defects; however, several single and double mutations are lethal or conditional lethal and cause a block before the first step of splicing. We used U6 compensatory mutations to assess the contribution of helix III and found that if it forms, helix III is dispensable for splicing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. On the other hand, mutations in known protein components of the splicing apparatus suppress or enhance the phenotypes of mutations within the invariant sequence that connect the branchpoint recognition sequence to stem IIa. Lethal mutations in the region are suppressed by Cus1-54p, a mutant yeast splicing factor homologous to a mammalian SF3b subunit. Synthetic lethal interactions show that this region collaborates with the DEAD-box protein Prp5p and the yeast SF3a subunits Prp9p, Prp11p, and Prp21p. Together, the data show that the highly conserved RNA element downstream of the branchpoint recognition sequence of U2 snRNA in yeast cells functions primarily with the proteins that make up SF3 rather than with U6 snRNA.     

Molecular comparison of monocot and dicot U1 and U2 snRNAs

To elucidate differences between the pre-mRNA splicing components in monocots and dicots, we have cloned and characterized several U1 and U2 snRNA sequence variants expressed in wheat seedling nuclei. Primer extension sequencing on wheat and pea snRNA populations has demonstrated that two 5'-terminal nucleotides found in most other U1 snRNAs are missing/modified in many plant U1 snRNAs. Comparison of the wheat U1 and U2 snRNA variants with their counterparts expressed in pea nuclei has defined regions of structural divergence between monocot and dicot U1 and U2 snRNAs. The U1 and U2 snRNA sequences involved in RNA:RNA interaction with pre-mRNAs are absolutely conserved. Significant differences occur between wheat and pea U1 snRNAs in stem I and II structures implicated in the binding of U1-specific proteins suggesting that the monocot and dicot U1-specific snRNP proteins differ in their binding specificities. Stem III structures, which are required in mammalian systems for splicing complex formation but not for U1-specific protein binding, differ more extensively than stems I, II, or IV. In U2 snRNAs, the sequence differences between these two species are primarily localized in stem III and in stem IV which has been implicated in snRNP protein binding. These differences suggest that monocot and dicot U1 and U2 snRNPs represent distinct entities that may have monocot- and dicot-specific snRNP protein variants associated with each snRNA.     

The ribonucleotidyl transferase USIP-1 acts with SART3 to promote U6 snRNA recycling

The spliceosome is a large molecular machine that serves to remove the intervening sequences that are present in most eukaryotic pre-mRNAs. At its core are five small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complexes, the U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6 snRNPs, which undergo dynamic rearrangements during splicing. Their reutilization for subsequent rounds of splicing requires reversion to their original configurations, but little is known about this process. Here, we show that ZK863.4/USIP-1 (U Six snRNA-Interacting Protein-1) is a ribonucleotidyl transferase that promotes accumulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans U6 snRNA. Endogenous USIP-1–U6 snRNA complexes lack the Lsm proteins that constitute the protein core of the U6 snRNP, but contain the U6 snRNP recycling factor SART3/B0035.12. Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that SART3 but not USIP-1 occurs also in a separate complex containing both the U4 and U6 snRNPs. Based on this evidence, genetic interaction between usip-1 and sart-3, and the apparent dissociation of Lsm proteins from the U6 snRNA during spliceosome activation, we propose that USIP-1 functions upstream of SART3 to promote U6 snRNA recycling.     

U6 snRNA function in nuclear pre-mRNA splicing: a phosphorothioate interference analysis of the U6 phosphate backbone.

U6 snRNA is essential for and may participate in the catalysis of pre-mRNA splicing. Extensive mutational analyses in several systems have identified nucleotides essential for U6 function in splicing; however, relatively little is known regarding the role of the U6 phosphate backbone. We previously described a mutation in a nematode U6 snRNA that causes it to be used as a splicing substrate within the spliceosome. This unusual reaction has made it possible to apply modification interference analysis to U6 function. Here, we have used phosphorothioate substitution to identify pro-R oxygens throughout the U6 backbone that are necessary for the first and/or second catalytic steps of splicing. Four pro-R oxygens are important for the first step; of these only two appear to be required. One additional pro-R oxygen is uniquely required for the second step. The two pro-R oxygens critical for the first step of splicing are in the helix 1b U2/U6 interaction region and the intramolecular stem-loop of U6, respectively. A comparison of the positions of these two pro-R oxygens with those found to be critical for autocatalytic excision of a group II intron suggests a possible functional similarity between U6 snRNA and domain V of group II introns.     

Functionally important structural elements of U12 snRNA

U12 snRNA is analogous to U2 snRNA of the U2-dependent spliceosome and is essential for the splicing of U12-dependent introns in metazoan cells. The essential region of U12 snRNA, which base pairs to the branch site of minor class introns is well characterized. However, other regions which are outside of the branch site base pairing region are not yet characterized and the requirement of these structures in U12-dependent splicing is not clear. U12 snRNA is predicted to form an intricate secondary structure containing several stem-loops and single-stranded regions. Using a previously characterized branch site genetic suppression assay, we generated second-site mutations in the suppressor U12 snRNA to investigate the in vivo requirement of structural elements in U12-dependent splicing. Our results show that stem-loop IIa is essential and required for in vivo splicing. Interestingly, an evolutionarily conserved stem-loop IIb is dispensable for splicing. We also show that stem-loop III, which binds to a p65 RNA binding protein of the U11-U12 di.snRNP complex, is essential for in vivo splicing. The data validate the existence of proposed stem-loops of U12 snRNA and provide experimental support for individual secondary structures.