Persistence of the luteal phase following ovulation during altrenogest treatment in mares

Two experiments were conducted to test the efficacy of altrenogest treatment in mares. The response to 15-d altrenogest treatment (Experiment 1) was characterized in 20 mares that were given 22 mg daily of altrenogest in oil (n = 10) or in gel (n = 10) from Day 10 to 25 after ovulation. In 17 mares, luteolysis occurred during altrenogest treatment (Day 17.7 +/- 0.5), while 2 mares retained their corpus luteum (CL), and 1 mare had a diestrous ovulation on Day 16, resulting in a prolonged luteal phase. Ten of the 17 mares in which the CL had spontaneously regressed returned to estrus after the end of treatment, and ovulated 5.7 +/- 0.8 d after the end of altrenogest treatment. Two of these 17 mares ovulated 2 and 3 d after the end of altrenogest treatment but ovulation was not accompanied by estrous behavior, and 5 mares ovulated during altrenogest treatment resulting in an interovulatory interval of 22.4 +/- 1.1 d (range: 20 to 25d). Five mares which ovulated during altrenogest treatment and 2 mares which ovulated during silent estrus after the end of altrenogest treatment failed to regress the CL around 14 d post ovulation, and had a prolonged luteal phase. In Experiment 2, the effect of altrenogest administered from luteolysis to ovulation on duration of the subsequent luteal period was analyzed. In 6 mares altrenogest was begun on Day 14 post ovulation and continued until the hCG-induced ovulation. The interval from ovulation during altrenogest treatment to spontaneous luteolysis was 45.6 +/- 2.4 d (range: 40 to 54d) in altrenogest-treated mares and was significantly longer than in 10 untreated control mares (14.5 +/- 0.3 d, range: 13 to 16d). The results suggest that the oil and gel altrenogest preparations are equally effective in modulating estrous behavior and time to estrus and ovulation. Altrenogest treatment started late in diestrus appears to result in a high incidence of ovulation during treatment and when luteolysis and ovulation occur during treatment; the subsequent luteal phase is frequently prolonged due to failure of regression of the CL.     

Effect of xylazine on interovulatory interval and serum progesterone concentrations in the horse mare

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist, xylazine, on interovulatory interval and progesterone concentrations in the horse mare. Mares were assigned to one of four treatments: Group 1 (controls) received an intramuscular injection (i.m.) of 5 cc saline (n=6), Group 2 received 10 mg prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) i.m. (n=5), Group 3 received 500 mg xylazine i.m. (n=6) and group 4 received an intravenous injection (i.v) of 350 mg xylazine (n=6). Treatment was administered on Day 10 of the estrous cycle (Day 0 = Day of detected ovulation). There was no difference in length of interovulatory interval between PGF(2alpha)-treated mares and control mares (mean +/- SEM; 18.8 +/- 1.0 versus 21.7 +/- 1.6 d). When compared with either xylazine-treated group, PGF(2alpha)-treated mares had a shorter interovulatory interval (18.3 +/- 1.0 d versus 22.2 +/- 0.6 and 22.8 +/- 1.3 d, respectively; P < 0.05). There was no difference in the length of interovulatory interval between control mares and either xylazine-treated group. At the time of treatment all mares had progesterone concentrations > 10 ng/ml, therefore the onset of luteolysis was defined as the day of the estrous cycle when progesterone concentrations decreased below 10 ng/ml. In PGF(2alpha)-treated mares, this event occurred earlier than in any other group (Day 11.2 +/- 0.2 of the estrous cycle versus 16.0 +/- 1.3 for control, Day 15.7 +/- 0.2 for Group 3 and Day 15.2 +/- 0.6 for Group 4; P < 0.002). It was concluded that a single treatment with xylazine, either by an intramuscular or intravenous route, had no significant effect on interovulatory interval or progesterone concentrations in horse mares.     

Antiluteogenic effects of serial prostaglandin F2α administration in cycling mares

A single dose of PGF2α does not consistently induce luteolysis in the equine CL until at least 5 days after ovulation, leading to the erroneous assumption that the early CL is refractory to the luteolytic effects of PGF2α. We hypothesized that serial administration of PGF2α in early diestrus would induce a return to estrus similar to mares treated with a single injection in mid-diestrus, and fertility of the induced estrus would not differ. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effects of the 2 approaches as reflected by: (1) concentrations of plasma progesterone; (2) interovulatory and treatment-to-ovulation intervals; (3) the proportion of mares pregnant after artificial insemination. The study consisted of a balanced crossover design in which 10 reproductively normal Quarter Horse Mares were exposed to 2 treatments on 2 consecutive reproductive cycles. At detected ovulation (Day 0), mares were randomly allotted to 1 of 2 treatment groups: I, mid-diestrus treatment, administration of a single 10-mg dose of dinoprost tromethamine (PGF2α) im on Day 10; II, early diestrus treatment, administration of 10-mg PGF2α im twice daily on Days 0, 1, and 2 and once daily on Days 3 and 4. Mares in estrus and with a follicle 35 mm or greater in diameter were artificially inseminated with at least 2 billion motile sperm from a fertile stallion. Pregnancy was defined as detection of a growing embryonic vesicle on 2 consecutive examinations approximately 14 days after ovulation. Serial plasma samples were collected throughout the study period, and concentration of plasma progesterone was determined by RIA. A mixed-model ANOVA for repeated measures was used to analyze hormonal data. Interovulatory and treatment-to-ovulation intervals were compared by a paired t test and fertility by a McNemar chi-square analysis. All mares in group I underwent luteolysis after PGF2α administration denoted by mean (±SD) concentration of plasma progesterone of 0.25 ± 0.21 ng/mL detected 2 days after treatment. In group II, mean concentration of plasma progesterone remained below 1.0 ng/mL during treatment and until the onset of the next estrus. The mean interovulatory interval in group I was 18.5 ± 2.0 days compared with 13.1 ± 3.7 days in group II (P < 0.01). Treatment-to-ovulation intervals were 8.5 ± 2.0 days and 13.1 ± 3.7 days for groups I and II, respectively (P < 0.05). In both groups, 9 of 10 mares were pregnant (P = 1.0). Serial PGF2α administration beginning at ovulation consistently prevented luteal function in 10 of 10 mares in the present study without adversely affecting pregnancy rate of post-treatment cycles.     

Temporal interrelationships among luteolysis, FSH and LH concentrations and follicle deviation in mares

The effect of altered LH concentrations on the deviation in growth rates between the 2 largest follicles was studied in pony mares. The progestational phase was shortened by administration of PGF2alpha on Day 10 (Day 0=ovulation; n=9) or lengthened by daily administration of 100 mg of progesterone on Days 10 to 30 (n=11; controls, n=10). All follicles > or = 5 mm were ablated on Day 10 in all groups to initiate a new follicular wave. The interovulatory interval was not altered by the PGF2alpha treatment despite a 4-day earlier decrease in progesterone concentrations. Time required for growth of the follicles of the new wave apparently delayed the interval to ovulation after luteolysis. The FSH concentrations of the first post-ablation FSH surge were not different among groups. A second FSH surge with an associated follicular wave began by Day 22 in 7 of 11 mares in the progesterone group and in 0 of 19 mares in the other groups, indicating reduced functional competence of the largest follicle. A prolonged elevation in LH concentrations began on the mean day of wave emergence (Day 11) in the prostaglandin group (19.2 +/- 2.2 vs 9.0 +/- 0.7 ng/mL in controls; P<0.05), an average of 4 d before an increase in the controls. Concentrations of LH in the progesterone group initially increased until Day 14 and then decreased so that by Day 18 the concentrations were lower (P<0.05) than in the control group (12.9 +/- 1.6 vs 20.2 +/- 2.6 ng/mL). Neither the early and prolonged increase nor the early decrease in LH concentrations altered the growth profile of the second-largest follicle, suggesting that LH was not involved in the initiation of deviation. However, the early decrease in LH concentrations in the progesterone group was followed by a smaller (P<0.05) diameter of the largest follicle by Day 20 (26.9 +/- 1.7 mm) than the controls (30.3 +/- 1.7 mm), suggesting that LH was necessary for continued growth of the largest follicle after deviation.     

Luteal function in jennies following PGF(2alpha) treatment 3 days after ovulation

Native PGF(2alpha) and its analogs have been used in the horse mare to manipulate ovarian activity, primarily as luteolytic agents to induce estrus. Despite numerous studies on the effects of these luteolysins in the mare, to date only a single investigation has been conducted in the jenny. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of the corpus luteum (CL) to a single dose of PGF(2alpha) given 3 days (72h) after ovulation and to establish the plasma progesterone (P4) profile from pre-treatment to post-treatment ovulation in the Martina Franca donkey. Twenty-two jennies were ultrasonographically monitored and treated 72h after the detection of ovulation with 0.075 mg i.m. of R-cloprostenol. From the day of ovulation until ovulation post-treatment, blood was collected daily for P4 determination by enhanced luminescence immunoassay. All the jennies except one, exhibited behavioral signs of PGF(2alpha)-induced estrus within 4 days of treatment lasting 5.4+/-1.16 days. Post-treatment ovulation was also hastened, reducing the interovulatory interval (9.6 days). In response to treatment, plasma P4 concentrations fell to estrus levels and then remained constant until the next ovulation in all but the non-responding animal. Our findings indicate that PGF(2alpha) treatment on Day 3 post-ovulation causes the functional regression of the CL in the jenny, reflected both by the rapid induction of estrus and ovulation and by an abrupt drop in circulating P4 concentrations.     

The effect of intrauterine and cervical manipulation on the equine oestrous cycle and hormone profiles.

Endometrial biopsy or endometrial biopsy and uterine culture taken on Day 4 after oestrus induced lysis of the corpus luteum (CL), resulting in a sharp decline in serum progesterone concentration and shortened the interoestrous interval in 8/12 and 32/33 oestrous cycles, respectively, during 2 experiments. Cervical dilatation 4 days after oestrus shortened the interoestrus interval in 5/10 and 0/5 oestrous cycles. Endometrial biopsy and culture on Days 1 and 3 after oestrus also induced CL lysis during 4 of 7 cycles. Total oestrogen (oestrone plus oestradiol) concentrations increased at the onset of the subsequent oestrus in mares biopsied on Day 4 of dioestrus or in control cycle oestrous periods. Endometrial biopsy also induced lysis of the CL in mares with persistent luteal function. It is postulated that intracervical or intrauterine manipulations during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle may directly, or indirectly, stimulate the release of an endogenous luteolysin (prostaglandin) resulting in CL regression, followed by oestrus and ovulation in the mare.     

Induction of luteolysis in mares by ultrasound-guided intraluteal treatment with PGF2alpha.

To evaluate the technique of ultrasound-guided luteal injection in mares, PGF2alpha was administered under ultrasound guidance to horse mares (n = 7 to 9 per group) on Day 9 postovulation via either a systemic (i.m.; zero, 0.01, 0.1, or 5 mg/dose) route or a local intraluteal (i.l.; zero, 0.01 or 0.1 mg/dose) route. The luteolytic efficacy of each treatment was determined based on post-treatment decreases in progesterone concentration, interval to uterine edema (IE) and interovulatory interval (IOI). Local administration of PGF2alpha directly into the CL consistently induced luteolysis, at doses up to 50-fold lower than the lowest effective systemic dose. Significant decreases in IOI and IE occurred in mares treated with 5 mg PGF2alpha i.m. or 0.1 mg PGF2alpha i.l., but did not occur in mares treated with 0.1 or 0.01 mg PGF2alpha i.m., 0.01 mg PGF i.l., vehicle i.l. or vehicle i.m.. Progesterone concentrations were reduced to less than 10% of pretreatment values by two days post treatment in mares treated with 5 mg PGF2alpha i.m. or 0.1 mg PGF2alpha i.l.. PGF2alpha doses of 0.1 mg i.m. and 0.01 mg i.l. were associated with smaller but significant progesterone decreases (to 66% and 46% of pre-treatment values, respectively) by two days post treatment. Progesterone values after administration of i.l. vehicle did not differ from pre-treatment values by two days post treatment, but were significantly lower (53% of pre-treatment values) by four days post treatment. Intramuscular treatment with vehicle or 0.01 mg of PGF2alpha did not significantly reduce progesterone concentrations below pretreatment values. Overall, the minimum effective luteolytic dose of PGF2alpha given intraluteally was between 0.01 and 0.1 mg. Based on the results of this study, ultrasound-guided i.l. injection appears to be a repeatable method for studying the direct effect of other chemicals on luteal function. However, the current procedure carries some risk, since three i.l. injections were associated with ovarian abscesses.     

Ovulation synchronization following commercial application of ultrasound-guided follicle ablation during the estrous cycle in mares

A regimen of progesterone plus estradiol (P&E) was used as a standard for ovarian synchronization to test the efficacy and evaluate the commercial application of ultrasound-guided follicle ablation as a non-steroidal alternative for ovulation synchronization in mares. Recipient mares at a private embryo transfer facility were at unknown stages of the estrous cycle at the start of the experiment on Day 1 when they were randomly assigned to an ablation group (n=18-21 mares) or to a P&E group (n=20-21 mares). In the ablation group, mares were lightly sedated and all follicles > or = 10 mm were removed by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration. In the P&E group, a combination of progesterone (150 mg) plus estradiol (10mg) prepared in safflower oil was given daily (im) for 10 d. Two doses of prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF, 10mg/dose, im) were given 12 h apart on Day 5 in the ablation group, or a single dose on Day 10 in the P&E group. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, 2500 IU/mare, im) was given at a fixed time, 6 and 10 d after PGF treatment in the ablation and P&E groups, respectively, with the expectation of a follicle > or = 30 mm at the time of treatment. In both the ablation and P&E groups, transrectal ultrasonography was done at the start of the study (Day 1) and again on the day of hCG treatment and daily thereafter to determine the presence of a CL, measure diameter of the largest follicle and detect ovulation. The mean interval from the start of the study and from PGF treatment to ovulation was shorter (P<0.0001) in the ablation group (13.7 and 9.7 d, respectively) compared to the P&E group (22.3 and 13.2 d, respectively). Following fixed-day treatment with hCG after PGF treatment, the degree of ovulation synchronization was not different (P>0.05) between the ablation and P&E groups within a 2-d (56 and 70%) or 4-d (83% and 90%) period. Although ultrasound-guided follicle ablation may not be practical in all circumstances, it excluded the conventional 10-d regimen of progesterone and estradiol and was considered an efficacious and feasible, non-steroidal alternative for ovulation synchronization in mares during the estrous cycle.     

Effect of periovulatory prostaglandin F2alpha on pregnancy rates and luteal function in the mare.

The objective of this study was to determine whether periovulatory treatments with PGF2alpha affects the development of the CL, and whether the treatment was detrimental to the establishment of pregnancy. Reproductively sound mares were assigned randomly to one of the following treatment groups during consecutive estrus cycles: 1. 3,000 IU hCG within 24 hours before artificial insemination and 500 microg cloprostenol (PGF2alpha analogue) on Days 0, 1, and 2 after ovulation (n=8), 2. 2 mL sterile water injection within 24 hours before artificial insemination and 500 microg cloprostenol on Days 0, 1, and 2 after ovulation (n=8); 3. 3,000 IU hCG within 24 hours before artificial insemination and 500 microg cloprostenol on Day 2 after ovulation (n=8); or 4. 3,000 IU hCG within 24 hours before artificial insemination and 2 mL of sterile water on Days 0, 1, and 2 after ovulation (controls; n=8). Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein on Days 0, 1, 2, 5, 8, 11, and 14 after ovulation. Plasma progesterone concentrations were determined by the use of a solid phase 125I radioimmunoassay. All mares were examined for pregnancy by the use of transrectal ultrasonography at 14 days after ovulation. Mares in Group 1 and 2 had lower plasma progesterone concentrations at Day 2 and 5, compared to mares in the control group (P < 0.001). No difference was detected between group 1 and 2. Plasma progesterone concentrations in group 3 were similar to the control group until the day of treatment, but decreased after treatment and were significantly lower than the control group at Day 5 (P < 0.001). Plasma progesterone concentrations increased in all treatment groups after Day 5, and were comparable among all groups at Day 14 after ovulation. Cloprostenol treatment had a significant effect on pregnancy rates (P < 0.01). The pregnancy rate was 12.5% in Group 1, 25% in Group 2, 38% in Group 3, and 62.5% in Group 4. It was concluded that periovulatory treatment with PGF2alpha has a detrimental effect on early luteal function and pregnancy.     

Progesterone and estradiol in biodegradable microspheres for control of estrus and ovulation in mares

Progesterone and estradiol 17-beta in poly (DL-lactide) microspheres were used to control estrus and ovulation in mares after luteolysis was induced by prostaglandin F(2)infinity. Mares were given a single intramuscular injection of biodegradable poly (DL-lactide) microspheres, 1 day following prostaglandin treatment, containing no hormones (control), 0.625 g progesterone and 50 mg estradiol (low dose), 1.25 g progesterone and 100 mg estradiol (medium dose), or 1.875 g progesterone and 150 mg estradiol (high dose; n=15 mares per group). Mares treated with the low dose had significantly longer intervals (P<0.05) to estrus and ovulation than the control mares; however, low dose mares had shorter intervals (P<0.05) to estrus than high dose mares and shorter intervals to ovulation than medium and high dose mares. Regression analysis indicated that the medium dose was sufficient for maximizing interval to ovulation while the high dose maximized interval to estrus. All groups of mares exhibited similar (P>0.05) post-treatment estrus lengths. A clinical response scoring system based on synchrony of both estrus and ovulation within a treatment group was also used to measure the effectiveness of treatments on control of estrus and ovulation. Clinical response scores did not differ (P>0.05) among treatment groups. Mares were randomly assigned for insemination at the beginning of the first post-treatment estrus. Rates for embryo recovery performed by uterine lavage 7 days post-ovulation did not differ (P>0.05) among groups. Concentrations of serum progesterone increased in mares receiving progesterone and estradiol microspheres. At 10 to 14 days post-injection of microspheres, progesterone concentrations were higher (P<0.05) and remained above 1 ng/ml in the mares receiving the high dose. Progesterone concentrations were also higher (P<0.05) on Days -3 to -1 (Day 0 = day of post-treatment ovulation) in mares receiving the high dose when compared to control mares. Gonadotropin concentrations were suppressed (P<0.05) in the medium and high dose groups.     

Role of progesterone in mobility, fixation, orientation, and survival of the equine embryonic vesicle

Luteal progesterone was removed by an injection of prostaglandin F(2alpha) or bilateral ovariectomy on Day 12 of pregnancy in pony mares. The embryonic vesicle remained mobile in the uterus until loss occurred on Days 13, 13, 15, or 19 in four prostaglandin-treated mares and Days 15, 17, 19, or 26 in four ovariectomized mares. Exogenous progesterone given daily, starting on Day 12, maintained pregnancy until Day 40 in five of five prostaglandin-treated and three of four ovariectomized mares. During two-hour mobility trials on Day 14, embryonic vesicles in mares without luteal or exogenous progesterone (n = 9) moved to a different uterine segment less frequently (mean number of location changes per two-hour trial: 7.2 +/-1.0 vs 10.4 +/-1.1, P < 0.05) and were observed more often in the uterine body (14.9 +/-2.9 vs 8.9 +/-1.3, P < 0.10) compared to vesicles in mares with a progesterone influence (n = 15). Of mares that still had a vesicle present on Day 18, fixation occurred by Day 17 in all (12 12 ) mares under the influence of luteal or exogenous progesterone but failed to occur in the three mares that were not under progesterone influence. Progesterone replacement was started on Day 16 in three mares that received prostaglandin F(2alpha) on Day 12 and still had a vesicle on Day 16. The vesicle was maintained and continued to develop in all three mares, indicating that the vesicles were viable four days after PGF(2alpha) treatment. However, fixation tended to be delayed (P < 0.15) and orientation of the embryo proper was altered (P < 0.005) compared to mares that were continuously under the influence of progesterone. The results demonstrated the importance of luteal progesterone to mobility, fixation, orientation, and survival of the embryonic vesicle.     

Changes in patterns of luteinizing hormone secretion before and after the first ovulation in the postpartum mare

To determine whether luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion during the first estrous cycle postpartum is characterized by pulsatile release, circulating LH concentrations were measured in 8 postpartum mares, 4 of which had been treated with 150 mg progesterone and 10 mg estradiol daily for 20 days after foaling to delay ovulation. Blood samples were collected every 15 min for 8 h on 4 occasions: 3 times during the follicular phase (Days 2-4, 5-7, and 8-11 after either foaling or end of steroid treatment), and once during the luteal phase (Days 5-8 after ovulation). Ovulation occurred in 4 mares 13.2 +/- 0.6 days postpartum and in 3 of 4 mares 12.0 +/- 1.1 days post-treatment. Before ovulation, low-amplitude LH pulses (approximately 1 ng/ml) were observed in 3 mares; such LH pulses occurred irregularly (1-2/8 h) and were unrelated to mean circulating LH levels, which gradually increased from less than 1 ng/ml at foaling or end of steroid treatment to maximum levels (12.3 ng/ml) within 48 h after ovulation. In contrast, 1-3 high-amplitude LH pulses (3.7 +/- 0.7 ng/ml) were observed in 6 of 7 mares during an 8-h period of the luteal phase. The results suggest that in postpartum mares LH release is pulsatile during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle, whereas before ovulation LH pulses cannot be readily identified.     

Specific PGF-2 alpha binding by the corpus luteum of the pregnant and non-pregnant mare.

The binding of prostaglandin (PG) F-2 alpha to corpora lutea (CL) from pregnant and non-pregnant Pony mares was examined. Studies of the rates of association and dissociation indicated that [3H]PGF was bound specifically and reversibly to a luteal cell membrane preparation (MP) that was isolated by high speed (100,000 g) ultracentrifugation. Various PGs and PG metabolites displaced [3H]PGF from the receptors in the following decreasing order: PGF-2 alpha greater than 13, 14-dihydro-PGF-2 alpha = 13,14-dihydro-15-keto PGF-2 alpha greater than PGD-2 greater than PGF-1 alpha = PGE-2 greater than PGE-2 beta greater than PGE-1. These data implicate the 9 alpha-OH and 5,6 cis double bond as major contributors to PGF receptor recognition. The membrane preparation appeared to contain at least two receptor populations, a high affinity, low capacity and a low affinity, high capacity receptor. The binding of PGF (pg/mg MP protein +/- s.e.m. (n)) to CL of the non-pregnant mare increased from 4.09 +/- 11.6 (4), on Day 4 after ovulation, to reach maximal levels by Day 12, 15.01 +/- 2.5 (4), and declined thereafter. In pregnancy the binding of PGF continued to increase until Day 18, reaching 27.47 +/- 1.7 (3), before it declined on Day 20. The reduction in binding by Day 16 in the non-pregnant mare may reflect the process of luteolysis, while high PGF binding capacity of CL between Days 16 and 18 of pregnancy indicated that luteal maintenance during pregnancy is not associated with a reduction of PGF binding capabilities.     

Reduction in size of the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate

We hypothesized that reducing the size of the ovulatory follicle using aspiration and GnRH would reduce the size of the resulting CL, reduce circulating progesterone concentrations, and alter conception rates. Lactating dairy cows (n=52) had synchronized ovulation and AI by treating with GnRH and PGF2alpha as follows: Day -9, GnRH (100 microg); Day -2, PGF2alpha (25 mg); Day 0, GnRH (100 microg); Day 1, AI. Treated cows (aspirated group; n=29) had all follicles > 4 mm in diameter aspirated on Days -5 or -6 in order to start a new follicular wave. Control cows (nonaspirated group: n=23) had no follicle aspiration. The size of follicles and CL were monitored by ultrasonography. The synchronized ovulation rate (ovulation rate to second GnRH injection: 42/52=80.8%) and double ovulation rate of synchronized cows (6/42=14.3%) did not differ (P > 0.05) between groups. Aspiration reduced the size of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.0001; 11.5 +/- 0.2 vs 14.5 +/- 0.4 mm), and serum estradiol concentrations at second GnRH treatment (P < 0.0002; 2.5 +/- 0.4 vs 5.7 +/- 0.6 pg/mL). The volume of CL was less (P < 0.05) for aspirated than nonaspirated cows on Day 7 (2,862 +/- 228 vs 5,363 +/- 342 mm3) or Day 14 (4,652 +/- 283 vs 6,526 +/- 373 mm3). Similarly, serum progesterone concentrations were less on Day 7 (P < 0.05) and Day 14 (P < 0.10) for aspirated cows. Pregnancy rate per AI for synchronized cows was lower (P < 0.05) for aspirated (3/21=14.3%) than nonaspirated (10/21=47.6%) cows. In conclusion, ovulation of smaller follicles produced lowered fertility possibly because development of smaller CL decreased circulating progesterone concentrations.     

Changes in steady-state concentrations of messenger ribonucleic acids in luteal tissue during prostaglandin F2alpha induced luteolysis in mares

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided luteal biopsy was used to evaluate the effects of prostaglandin (PG)F2alpha on steady-state concentrations of mRNA for specific genes that may be involved in regression of the corpus luteum (CL). Eight days after ovulation (Hour 0), mares (n=8/group) were randomized into three groups: control (no treatment or biopsy), saline+biopsy (saline treatment at Hour 0 and luteal biopsy at Hour 12), or PGF2alpha+biopsy (5mg PGF2alpha at Hour 0 and luteal biopsy at Hour 12). The effects of biopsy on CL were compared between the controls (no biopsy) and saline+biopsy group. At Hour 24 (12h after biopsy) there was a decrease in circulating progesterone in saline group to 56% of pre-biopsy values, indicating an effect of biopsy on luteal function. Mean plasma progesterone concentrations were lower (P<0.001) at Hour 12 in the PG group compared to the other two groups. The relative concentrations of mRNA for different genes in luteal tissue at Hour 12 was quantified by real time PCR. Compared to saline-treated mares, treatment with PGF2alpha increased mRNA for cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2, 310%, P<0.006), but decreased mRNA for LH receptor to 44% (P<0.05), steroidogenic acute regulatory protein to 22% (P<0.001), and aromatase to 43% (P<0.1) of controls. There was no difference in mRNA levels for PGF2alpha receptor between PG and saline-treated groups. Results indicated that luteal biopsy alters subsequent luteal function. However, the biopsy approach was effective for collecting CL tissue for demonstrating dynamic changes in steady-state levels of mRNAs during PGF2alpha-induced luteolysis. Increased Cox-2 mRNA concentrations suggested that exogenous PGF2alpha induced the synthesis of intraluteal PGF2alpha. Thus, the findings are consistent with the concept that an intraluteal autocrine loop augments the luteolytic effect of uterine PGF2alpha in mares.     

Progesterone and follicular changes in postpartum noncyclic dairy cows after treatment with progesterone and estradiol or with progesterone, GnRH, PGF2alpha, and estradiol

A previous study showed that noncyclic dairy cows treated with 10 microg of GnRH and a progesterone-releasing CIDR insert on Day 0, 25 mg of PGF2alpha and CIDR removal on Day 7, followed by 1 mg estradiol benzoate on Day 9 for those cows that still had not shown estrus (CGPE program) had higher conception rate (47% vs. 29%) than cows treated only with CIDR and estradiol benzoate as above (CE program). This study was to investigate the mechanisms by which the CGPE program improved conception rate compared with the CE program. Sixteen noncyclic Holstein-Friesian cows were randomly assigned to 2 groups balanced for the size and growth pattern of the dominant follicles, which were determined by ultrasonography over a 3-d period. One group received the above CGPE treatment, and the other group received the CE treatment. Follicular and luteal development were monitored by daily ultrasonography. Blood samples were collected daily from Day -2 to Day 11, and thereafter milk samples were collected thrice weekly for a further 24 d. Blood and milk samples were analyzed for progesterone. The GnRH treatment induced ovulation in 7 of 8 cows, resulting in elevated (P<0.05) progesterone concentrations between Days 4 and 7 for cows in the CGPE group. All induced CL underwent luteolysis by 24 h after PGF2alpha treatment. Within 5 d of CIDR removal, 7 of 8 cows in both the CE and CGPE groups ovulated. The interval from emergence of the ovulatory follicle to ovulation was similar (P=0.32) but less (P<0.05) variable for the CGPE group (9.0+/-0.3 d) compared with the CE group (10.3+/-1.2 d). Progesterone concentration in milk samples was similar between the two groups up to 10 d after ovulation. In summary, the GnRH treatment induced ovulation or turnover of dominant follicles, induced a synchronized initiation of a new follicular wave, and increased the progesterone concentration from 4 d after treatment. These could be the reasons for the increased conception rate of cows treated with the CGPE program.     

Deslorelin on Day 8 or 12 postovulation does not luteinize follicles during an artificially maintained diestrous phase in the mare

Practical estrus synchronization schemes are needed for mares. The Ovsynch synchronization protocol for cattle involves the administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) to induce ovulation or luteinization of dominant follicles during the luteal phase and prostaglandin 7 days later to cause regression of any luteal tissue and development of a preovulatory follicle. An Ovsynch-type synchronization program potentially could be developed for horses if luteinization or ovulation of diestrous follicles occurred in response to GnRH treatment. The objective of this study was to determine if administration of the GnRH agonist, deslorelin acetate, on Day 8 or 12 postovulation would induce luteinization or ovulation of diestrous follicles in the mare. The model used was cycling mares maintained in an artificial luteal phase by administration of a synthetic progestin following prostaglandin-induced luteal regression. On the day of ovulation, 21 light horse mares were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) no GnRH, altrenogest from Days 5 to 15 postovulation with prostaglandin on Day 15; (2) GnRH on Day 8, altrenogest from Days 5 to 15 with prostaglandin given on Day 6 to induce luteolysis of the primary corpus luteum, an implant containing 2.1mg of deslorelin acetate inserted on Day 8 and removed on Day 10, with a second prostaglandin treatment on Day 15; (3) GnRH on Day 12, altrenogest from Days 9 to 19, prostaglandin on Day 10, a deslorelin acetate implant injected on Day 12 (subsequently removed on Day 14), and a second dose of prostaglandin administered on Day 19. Follicular development was monitored every other day from Day 5 until a 30-mm sized follicle was observed, and then daily to detection of ovulation. Serum progesterone concentrations were determined daily for 12 consecutive days. Progesterone concentrations in Group 1 remained elevated until approximately Day 12 postovulation. Prostaglandin administration on Day 15 resulted in complete luteolysis in all seven mares. In Group 2, progesterone concentrations in six of seven mares declined to baseline after prostaglandin treatment. No increase in serum progesterone was noted in any of the six mares that were given GnRH on Day 8, including three mares that had diestrous follicles > or =30mm in diameter at the time of treatment. Similarly, progesterone concentrations in six of seven mares in Group 3 declined to baseline after prostaglandin and there was no increase in progesterone after administration of GnRH on Day 12. No ultrasound evidence of luteinization or ovulation of diestrous follicles were noted after GnRH administration in any mares of Group 2 or 3. In conclusion, administration of the GnRH agonist deslorelin acetate to mares failed to induce luteinization or ovulation of diestrous follicles. Consequently, the Ovsynch program (as used in cattle) has little efficacy for synchronization of estrus in mares.     

Increase in progesterone and luteal blood flow without a luteolytic response after prostaglandin F2α treatment in early luteal-phase heifers

Acute changes in circulating progesterone concentration and luteal blood flow in heifers after a conventional dose of prostaglandin F(2α) (PGF; 25mg dinoprost, i.m.) were compared between the early luteal phase (Day 3) and midluteal phase (Day 10; Day 0=ovulation), using four groups (Day-3 control, Day-3 PGF, Day-10 control, and Day-10 PGF; n=6 heifers/group). Blood samples were collected at 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min (0 min=treatment). Percentage of luteal area with color-Doppler blood-flow signals was estimated at 0, 10, and 30 min. In the Day-3 and Day-10 PGF groups, progesterone increased to a peak at 15 min. In the Day-3 PGF group, progesterone decreased to the pretreatment concentration by 60 min but did not decrease to below the pretreatment concentration during the 2-h experimental period. In the Day-10 PGF group, progesterone decreased to below pretreatment concentration by 30 min, indicating a luteolytic response. In the Day-3 and Day-10 PGF groups, luteal blood flow increased within 10 min and remained elevated until the last examination at 30 min. The absence of a decrease in progesterone to below pretreatment concentrations in the Day-3 PGF group indicated that luteolysis does not necessarily follow a transient increase in progesterone and a concomitant increase in luteal blood flow. The immediate transient increase in progesterone and an increase in luteal blood flow without a subsequent decrease in progesterone to below pretreatment concentrations after PGF treatment in early luteal-phase heifers are novel findings.     

Prostaglandin f(2alpha) induces distinct physiological responses in porcine corpora lutea after acquisition of luteolytic capacity

This study examines differences in intracellular responses to cloprostenol, a prostaglandin (PG)F(2alpha) analog, in porcine corpora lutea (CL) before (Day 9 of estrous cycle) and after (Day 17 of pseudopregnancy) acquisition of luteolytic capacity. Pigs on Day 9 or Day 17 were treated with saline or 500 microgram cloprostenol, and CL were collected 10 h (experiment I) or 0.5 h (experiment III) after treatment. Some CL were cut into small pieces and cultured to measure progesterone and PGF(2alpha) secretion. In experiment I, progesterone remained high and PGF(2alpha) low in luteal incubations from either Day 9 or Day 17 saline-treated pigs. Cloprostenol increased PGF(2alpha) production 465% and decreased progesterone production 87% only from Day 17 luteal tissue. Cloprostenol induced prostaglandin G/H synthase (PGHS)-2 mRNA (0.5 h) and protein (10 h) in both groups. In cell culture, cloprostenol or phorbol 12, 13-didecanoate (PDD) (protein kinase C activator), induced PGHS-2 mRNA in luteal cells from both groups. However, acute cloprostenol treatment (10 min) decreased progesterone production and increased PGF(2alpha) production only from Day 17 luteal cells. Thus, PGF(2alpha) production is induced by cloprostenol in porcine CL with luteolytic capacity (Day 17) but not in CL without luteolytic capacity (Day 9). However, this change in PGF(2alpha) production is not explained by a difference in induction of PGHS-2 mRNA or protein.     

Prostacyclin, prostaglandin F2 alpha and progesterone production by bovine luteal cells during the estrous cycle

Corpora lutea (CL) were collected from Holstein heifers on Days 5, 10, 15 and 18 (5/day) of the estrous cycle. Dispersed luteal cell preparations were made and 10(6) viable luteal cells were incubated with bovine luteinizing hormone (LH) and different amounts of arachidonic acid in the presence and absence of the prostaglandin (PG) synthetase inhibitor indomethacin. The concentrations of progesterone, PGF2 alpha and 6-keto-PGF1 alpha, the stable inactive metabolite of prostacyclin (PGI2), were measured. Day 5 CL had the greatest initial content of 6-keto-PGF1 alpha (1.01 +/- 0.16 ng/10(6) cells), and synthesized more 6-keto-PGF1 alpha (2.55 +/- 0.43) than CL collected on Days 10 (0.57 +/- 0.11), 15 (0.08 +/- 0.05) and 18 (0.19 +/- 0.03) during a 2-h incubation period. Arachidonic acid stimulated the production of 6-keto-PGF1 alpha by Days 10, 15 and 18 luteal tissue. PGF2 alpha was produced at a greater rate on Day 5 (0.69 +/- 0.17 ng/10(6) cells) than on Days 10 (0.06 +/- 0.01), 15 (0.04 +/- 0.02) and 18 (0.08 +/- 0.01). Arachidonic acid stimulated and indomethacin inhibited the production of PGF2 alpha, in most cases. The initial content of 6-keto-PGF1 alpha was higher than that of PGF2 alpha on all days of the cycle and more 6-keto-PGF1 alpha was synthesized in response to arachidonic acid addition. The ratio of 6-keto-PGF1 alpha content to PGF2 alpha content was 4.39, 2.30, 1.25 and 1.13 on Days 5, 10, 15 and 18, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)