Conserved domains of glycosyltransferases.

Glycosyltransferases catalyze the synthesis of glycoconjugates by transferring a properly activated sugar residue to an appropriate acceptor molecule or aglycone for chain initiation and elongation. The acceptor can be a lipid, a protein, a heterocyclic compound, or another carbohydrate residue. A catalytic reaction is believed to involve the recognition of both the donor and acceptor by suitable domains, as well as the catalytic site of the enzyme. To elucidate the structural requirements for substrate recognition and catalytic reactions of glycosyltransferases, we have searched the databases for homologous sequences, identified conserved amino acid residues, and proposed potential domain motifs for these enzymes. Depending on the configuration of the anomeric functional group of the glycosyl donor molecule and of the resulting glycoconjugate, all known glycosyltransferases can be divided into two major types: retaining glycosyltransferases, which transfer sugar residue with the retention of anomeric configuration, and inverting glycosyltransferases, which transfer sugar residue with the inversion of anomeric configuration. One conserved domain of the inverting glycosyltransferases identified in the database is responsible for the recognition of a pyrimidine nucleotide, which is either the UDP or the TDP portion of a donor sugar-nucleotide molecule. This domain is termed "Nucleotide Recognition Domain 1 beta," or NRD1 beta, since the type of nucleotide is the only common structure among the sugar donors and acceptors. NRD1 beta is present in 140 glycosyltransferases. The central portion of the NRD1 beta domain is very similar to the domain that is present in one family of retaining glycosyltransferases. This family is termed NRD1 alpha to designate the similarity and stereochemistry of sugar transfer, and it consists of 77 glycosyltransferases identified thus far. In the central portion there is a homologous region for these two families and this region probably has a catalytic function. A third conserved domain is found exclusively in membrane-bound glycosyltransferases and is termed NRD2; this domain is present in 98 glycosyltransferases. All three identified NRDs are present in archaebacterial, eubacterial, viral, and eukaryotic glycosyltransferases. The present article presents the alignment of conserved NRD domains and also presents a brief overview of the analyzed glycosyltransferases which comprise about 65% of all known sugar-nucleotide dependent (Leloir-type) and putative glycosyltransferases in different databases. A potential mechanism for the catalytic reaction is also proposed. This proposed mechanism should facilitate the design of experiments to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of glycosylation reactions. Amino acid sequence information within the conserved domain may be utilized to design degenerate primers for identifying DNA encoding new glycosyltransferases.     

Conserved DNA binding and self-association domains of the Drosophila zeste protein.

The zeste gene product is involved in two types of genetic effects dependent on chromosome pairing: transvection and the zeste-white interaction. Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence with that of the Drosophila virilis gene shows that several blocks of amino acid sequence have been very highly conserved. One of these regions corresponds to the DNA binding domain. Site-directed mutations in this region indicate that a sequence resembling that of the homeodomain DNA recognition helix is essential for DNA binding activity. The integrity of an amphipathic helical region is also essential for binding activity and is likely to be responsible for dimerization of the DNA binding domain. Another very strongly conserved domain of zeste is the C-terminal region, predicted to form a long helical structure with two sets of heptad repeats that constitute two long hydrophobic ridges at opposite ends and on opposite faces of the helix. We show that this domain is responsible for the extensive aggregation properties of zeste that are required for its role in transvection phenomena. A model is proposed according to which the hydrophobic ridges induce the formation of open-ended coiled-coil structures holding together many hundreds of zeste molecules and possibly anchoring these complexes to other nuclear structures.     

Conserved domains and evolution of secreted phospholipases A(2)

Secreted phospholipases A(2) (sPLA(2) s) are lipolytic enzymes present in organisms ranging from prokaryotes to eukaryotes but their origin and emergence are poorly understood. We identified and compared the conserved domains of 333 sPLA(2) s and proposed a model for their evolution. The conserved domains were grouped into seven categories according to the in silico annotated conserved domain collections of 'cd00618: PLA(2) _like' and 'pfam00068: Phospholip_A2_1'. PLA(2) s containing the conserved domain cd04706 (plant-specific PLA(2) ) are present in bacteria and plants. Metazoan PLA(2) s of the group (G) I/II/V/X PLA(2) collection exclusively contain the conserved domain cd00125. GIII PLA(2) s of both vertebrates and invertebrates contain the conserved domain cd04704 (bee venom-like PLA(2) ), and mammalian GIII PLA(2) s also contain the conserved domain cd04705 (similar to human GIII PLA(2) ). The sPLA(2) s of bacteria, fungi and marine invertebrates contain the conserved domain pfam09056 (prokaryotic PLA(2) ) that is the only conserved domain identified in fungal sPLA(2) s. Pfam06951 (GXII PLA(2) ) is present in bacteria and is widely distributed in eukaryotes. All conserved domains were present across mammalian sPLA(2) s, with the exception of cd04706 and pfam09056. Notably, no sPLA(2) s were found in Archaea. Phylogenetic analysis of sPLA(2) conserved domains reveals that two main clades, the cd- and the pfam-collection, exist, and that they have evolved via gene-duplication and gene-deletion events. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that sPLA(2) s in eukaryotes shared common origins with two types of bacterial sPLA(2) s, and their persistence during evolution may be related to their role in phospholipid metabolism, which is fundamental for survival.     

Conserved processes and lineage-specific proteins in fungal cell wall evolution

The cell wall is a defining organelle that differentiates fungi from its sister clades in the opisthokont superkingdom. With a sensitive technique to align low-complexity protein sequences, we have identified 187 cell wall-related proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and determined the presence or absence of homologs in 17 other fungal genomes. There were both conserved and lineage-specific cell wall proteins, and the degree of conservation was strongly correlated with protein function. Some functional classes were poorly conserved and lineage specific: adhesins, structural wall glycoprotein components, and unannotated open reading frames. These proteins are primarily those that are constituents of the walls themselves. On the other hand, glycosyl hydrolases and transferases, proteases, lipases, proteins in the glycosyl phosphatidyl-inositol-protein synthesis pathway, and chaperones were strongly conserved. Many of these proteins are also conserved in other eukaryotes and are associated with wall synthesis in plants. This gene conservation, along with known similarities in wall architecture, implies that the basic architecture of fungal walls is ancestral to the divergence of the ascomycetes and basidiomycetes. The contrasting lineage specificity of wall resident proteins implies diversification. Therefore, fungal cell walls consist of rapidly diversifying proteins that are assembled by the products of an ancestral and conserved set of genes.     

Conserved signal peptide recognition systems across the prokaryotic domains

The twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway is a protein targeting system found in bacteria, archaea, and chloroplasts. Proteins are directed to the Tat translocase by N-terminal signal peptides containing SRRxFLK "twin-arginine" amino acid motifs. The key feature of the Tat system is its ability to transport fully folded proteins across ionically sealed membranes. For this reason the Tat pathway has evolved for the assembly of extracytoplasmic redox enzymes that must bind cofactors, and so fold, prior to export. It is important that only cofactor-loaded, folded precursors are presented for export, and cellular processes have been unearthed that regulate signal peptide activity. One mechanism, termed "Tat proofreading", involves specific signal peptide binding proteins or chaperones. The archetypal Tat proofreading chaperones belong to the TorD family, which are dedicated to the assembly of molybdenum-dependent redox enzymes in bacteria. Here, a gene cluster was identified in the archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus that is predicted to encode a putative molybdenum-dependent tetrathionate reductase. The gene cluster also encodes a TorD family chaperone (AF0160 or TtrD) and in this work TtrD is shown to bind specifically to the Tat signal peptide of the TtrA subunit of the tetrathionate reductase. In addition, the 3D crystal structure of TtrD is presented at 1.35 ? resolution and a nine-residue binding epitope for TtrD is identified within the TtrA signal peptide close to the twin-arginine targeting motif. This work suggests that archaea may employ a chaperone-dependent Tat proofreading system that is similar to that utilized by bacteria.     

The yeast DNA repair proteins RAD1 and RAD7 share similar putative functional domains

Sequence information on eukaryotic DNA repair proteins provided so far only few clues concerning possible functional domains. Since the DNA repair process involves a strict sequential complex formation of several proteins [1988) FASEB J. 2, 2696-2701], we searched for special protein-protein interacting domains, which consist of tandemly repeated leucine rich motifs (LRM). Search algorithms, capable of detecting even largely divergent repeats by assessing their significance due to the tandem repetitivity, revealed that the yeast DNA repair proteins RAD1 and RAD7 contain 9 and 12 tandem LRM repeats, respectively. These results represent the first clues concerning specific domains in these proteins and assign them to the LRM superfamily, which includes such members as yeast adenylate cyclase, cell surface protein receptors and ribonuclease/angiogenin inhibitor, all exerting their function by specific protein-protein interactions involving LRM domains [( 1988) EMBO J. 7, 4151-4156; (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 8711-8715; (1989) Science 245, 494-499; (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 6436-6444; (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 6773-6777].     

Repair-FunMap: a functional database of proteins of the DNA repair systems

Repair-FunMap is a functional database of the DNA repair systems. This database contains not only the proteins directly involved in DNA repair, but also the proteins that interact with the DNA repair proteins. A protein interaction network associated with the human DNA repair processes was established according to the functional relationship between proteins in the database. This network represents the current knowledge on the intrinsic signaling pathways related to DNA repair. The Repair-FunMap could become an essential resource center for cancer research, providing clues to understanding the inter-relationship between proteins in the network, and to building scientific models of the DNA repair processes. AVAILABILITY: http://astro.temple.edu/~feng/Servers/BioinformaticServers.htm     

DNA repair and the evolution of transformation IV. DNA damage increases transformation

Natural genetic transformation in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis provides a model system to explore the evolutionary function of sexual recombination. In the present work, we study the response of transformation to UV irradiation using donor DNAs that differ in sequence homology to the recipient's chromosome and in the mechanism of transformation. The four donor DNAs used include homologous-chromosomal-DNA, two plasmids containing a fragment of B. subtilis trp⁺ operon DNA and a plasmid with no sequence homology to the recipient cell's DNA. Transformation frequencies for these DNA molecules increase with increasing levels of DNA damage (UV radiation) to recipient cells, only if their transformation requires homologous recombination (i.e. is recA⁺-dependent). Transformation with non-homologous DNA is independent of the recipient's recombination system and transformation frequencies for it do not respond to increases in UV radiation. The transformation frequency for a selectable marker increases in response to DNA damage more dramatically when the locus is present on small, plasmid-borne, homologous fragments than if it is carried on high molecular weight chromosomal fragments. We also study the kinetics of transformation for the different donor DNAs. Different kinetics are observed for homologous transformation depending on whether the homologous locus is carried on a plasmid or on chromosomal fragments. Chromosomal DNA- and non-homologous-plasmid-DNA-mediated transformation is complete (maximal) within several minutes, while transformation with a plasmid containing homologous DNA is still occurring after an hour. The results indicate that DNA damage directly increases rates of homologous recombination and transformation in B. subtilis. The relevance of these results and recent results of other labs to the evolution of transformation are discussed.     

Hijacked DNA repair proteins and unchained DNA polymerases

Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin (Ig) genes occurs at a frequency that is a million times greater than the mutation in other genes. Mutations occur in variable genes to increase antibody affinity, and in switch regions before constant genes to cause switching from IgM to IgG. Hypermutation is initiated in activated B cells when the activation-induced deaminase protein deaminates cytosine in DNA to uracil. Uracils can be processed by either a mutagenic pathway to produce mutations or a non-mutagenic pathway to remove mutations. In the mutagenic pathway, we first studied the role of mismatch repair proteins, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, PMS2 and MLH1, since they would recognize mismatches. The MSH2–MSH6 heterodimer is involved in hypermutation by binding to U:G and other mismatches generated during repair synthesis, but the other proteins are not necessary. Second, we analysed the role of low-fidelity DNA polymerases η, ι and θ in synthesizing mutations, and conclude that polymerase η is the dominant participant by generating mutations at A:T base pairs. In the non-mutagenic pathway, we examined the role of the Cockayne syndrome B protein that interacts with other repair proteins. Mice deficient in this protein had normal hypermutation and class switch recombination, showing that it is not involved.     

Mapping of interaction domains between human repair proteins ERCC1 and XPF.

ERCC1-XPF is a heterodimeric protein complexinvolved in nucleotide excision repair and recombinational processes. Like its homologous complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Rad10-Rad1, it acts as a structure-specific DNA endonuclease, cleaving at duplex-single-stranded DNA junctions. In repair, ERCC1-XPF and Rad10-Rad1 make an incision on the the 5'-side of the lesion. No humans with a defect in the ERCC1 subunit of this protein complex have been identified and ERCC1-deficient mice suffer from severe developmental problems and signs of premature aging on top of a repair-deficient phenotype. Xeroderma pigmentosum group F patients carry mutations in the XPF subunit and generally show the clinical symptoms of mild DNA repair deficiency. All XP-F patients examined demonstrate reduced levels of XPF and ERCC1 protein, suggesting that proper complex formation is required for stability of the two proteins. To better understand the molecular and clinical consequences of mutations in the ERCC1-XPF complex, we decided to map the interaction domains between the two subunits. The XPF-binding domain comprises C-terminal residues 224-297 of ERCC1. Intriguingly, this domain resides outside the region of homology with its yeast Rad10 counterpart. The ERCC1-binding domain in XPF maps to C-terminal residues 814-905. ERCC1-XPF complex formation is established by a direct interaction between these two binding domains. A mutation from an XP-F patient that alters the ERCC1-binding domain in XPF indeed affects complex formation with ERCC1.     

Structural bases for substrate recognition and repair system of base-excision DNA repair proteins.

The model structure of Escherichia coli AlkA (3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase II) protein complexed with the double helical DNA is elucidated from X-ray structures of related DNA glycosylase enzymes and mutagenic studies. The free enzyme structure has no difficulty in building the platform to afford the bended and wedge DNA with the flipped out nucleotide. The helix-hairpin-helix motif and the insertion residue L125 in free structure can be located without severe contacts. The alkylated base is surrounded with a variety of aromatic rings, such as W218, W272, Y273 and F18. The aromatic indole ring of tryptophan is a good candidate for forming the stacking with the positively charged base moiety pi-cation interaction). Some hydrophobic residues, such as V128 and L240, also attend to substrate recognition.     

DNA mismatch repair and synonymous codon evolution in mammals

It has been suggested that the differences in synonymous codon use between mammalian genes within a genome are due to differences in the efficiency of DNA mismatch repair. This hypothesis was tested by developing a model of mismatch repair, which was used to predict the expected relationship between the rate of substitution and G+C content at silent sites. It was found that the silent-substitution rate should decline with increasing G+C content over most of the G+C-content range, if it is assumed that mismatch repair is G+C biased, an assumption which is supported by data. This prediction was then tested on a set of 58 primate and artiodactyl genes. There was no evidence of a direct decline in substitution rate with increasing G+C content, for either twofold- or fourfold-degenerate sites. It was therefore concluded that variation in the efficiency of mismatch repair is not responsible for the differences in synonymous codon use between mammalian genes. In support of this conclusion, analysis of the model also showed that the parameter range over which mismatch repair can explain the differences in synonymous codon use between genes is very small.      

MAD2 interacts with DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates DNA damage repair

MAD2 (mitotic arrest deficient 2) is a key regulator of mitosis. Recently, it had been suggested that MAD2-induced mitotic arrest mediates DNA damage response and that upregulation of MAD2 confers sensitivity to DNA-damaging anticancer drug-induced apoptosis. In this study, we report a potential novel role of MAD2 in mediating DNA nucleotide excision repair through physical interactions with two DNA repair proteins, XPD (xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D) and ERCC1. First, overexpression of MAD2 resulted in decreased nuclear accumulation of XPD, a crucial step in the initiation of DNA repair. Second, immunoprecipitation experiments showed that MAD2 was able to bind to XPD, which led to competitive suppression of binding activity between XPD and XPA, resulting in the prevention of physical interactions between DNA repair proteins. Third, unlike its role in mitosis, the N-terminus domain seemed to be more important in the binding activity between MAD2 and XPD. Fourth, phosphorylation of H2AX, a process that is important for recruitment of DNA repair factors to DNA double-strand breaks, was suppressed in MAD2-overexpressing cells in response to DNA damage. These results suggest a negative role of MAD2 in DNA damage response, which may be accounted for its previously reported role in promoting sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in cancer cells. However, the interaction between MAD2 and ERCC1 did not show any effect on the binding activity between ERCC1 and XPA in the presence or absence of DNA damage. Our results suggest a novel function of MAD2 by interfering with DNA repair proteins.     

DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic domains are dispensable for DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell viability.

DNA polymerase epsilon (Pol epsilon) is believed to play an essential catalytic role during eukaryotic DNA replication and is thought to participate in recombination and DNA repair. That Pol epsilon is essential for progression through S phase and for viability in budding and fission yeasts is a central element of support for that view. We show that the amino-terminal portion of budding yeast Pol epsilon (Pol2) containing all known DNA polymerase and exonuclease motifs is dispensable for DNA replication, DNA repair, and viability. However, the carboxy-terminal portion of Pol2 is both necessary and sufficient for viability. Finally, the viability of cells lacking Pol2 catalytic function does not require intact DNA replication or damage checkpoints.     

Conserved interactions of the splicing factor Ntr1/Spp382 with proteins involved in DNA double-strand break repair and telomere metabolism

The ligation of DNA double-strand breaks in the process of non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is accomplished by a heterodimeric enzyme complex consisting of DNA ligase IV and an associated non-catalytic factor. This DNA ligase also accounts for the fatal joining of unprotected telomere ends. Hence, its activity must be tightly controlled. Here, we describe interactions of the DNA ligase IV-associated proteins Lif1p and XRCC4 of yeast and human with the putatively orthologous G-patch proteins Ntr1p/Spp382p and NTR1/TFIP11 that have recently been implicated in mRNA splicing. These conserved interactions occupy the DNA ligase IV-binding sites of Lif1p and XRCC4, thus preventing the formation of an active enzyme complex. Consistently, an excess of Ntr1p in yeast reduces NHEJ efficiency in a plasmid ligation assay as well as in a chromosomal double-strand break repair (DSBR) assay. Both yeast and human NTR1 also interact with PinX1, another G-patch protein that has dual functions in the regulation of telomerase activity and telomere stability, and in RNA processing. Like PinX1, NTR1 localizes to telomeres and associates with nucleoli in yeast and human cells, suggesting a function in localized control of DSBR.     

Yeast DNA recombination and repair proteins Rad 1 and Radio constitute a complex in vivo mediated by localized hydrophobic domains

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad 1 and Rad 10 proteins are required for damage-specific incision during nucleotide excision repair and also for certain mitotic recombination events between repeated sequences. Previously we have demonstrated that Rad1 and Rad10 form a specific complex in vitro. Using the ‘two-hybrid’ genetic assay system we now report that Rad1 and Rad10 proteins are subunits of a specific complex in the cell nucleus. The Rad10-binding domain of Rad1 protein maps to a localized region between amino acids 809–997. The Rad1 -binding domain of Radio protein maps between amino acids 90–210. These domains are evolutionarily conserved and are hydrophobic in character. Although significant homology exists between Rad10 and the human-DNA-repair protein Ercc1 in this region, we were unable to detect any interaction between Ercc1 and Rad1 proteins. We conclude that Rad1 and Rad10 operate in DNA repair and mitotic recombination as a constitutive complex.     

Conserved structural determinants in three-fingered protein domains

The three-dimensional structures of some components of snake venoms forming so-called 'three-fingered protein' domains (TFPDs) are similar to those of the ectodomains of activin, bone morphogenetic protein and transforming growth factor-beta receptors, and to a variety of proteins encoded by the Ly6 and Plaur genes. The analysis of sequences of diverse snake toxins, various ectodomains of the receptors that bind activin and other cytokines, and numerous gene products encoded by the Ly6 and Plaur families of genes has revealed that they differ considerably from each other. The sequences of TFPDs may consist of up to six disulfide bonds, three of which have the same highly conserved topology. These three disulfide bridges and an asparagine residue in the C-terminal part of TFPDs are essential for the TFPD-like fold. Analyses of the three-dimensional structures of diverse TFPDs have revealed that the three highly conserved disulfides impose a major stabilizing contribution to the TFPD-like fold, in both TFPDs contained in some snake venoms and ectodomains of several cellular receptors, whereas the three remaining disulfide bonds impose specific geometrical constraints in the three fingers of some TFPDs.