Nucleosome Positioning by Sequence,State of the Art and Apparent Finale

Abstract

All major suggestions about the nucleosome positioning sequence pattern(s) are overviewed. Two basic binary periodical patterns are well established: in purine/pyrimidine alphabet—YRRRRRYYYYYR and in strong/weak alphabet-SWWWWWSSSSSW. Their merger in four-letter alphabet sequence coincides with first ever complete matrix of nucleosome DNA bendability derived from very large database of nucleosome DNA sequences. Its simplified linear form is CGGAAATTTCCG. Several independent ways of derivation of the same pattern are described. It appears that the pattern represents an ultimate solution of long-standing problem of nucleosome positioning, and provides simple means for nucleosome mapping on sequences with single-base resolution.     

Nucleosomal locations of dominant DNA sequence motifs for histone-DNA interactions and nucleosome positioning

DNA sequence is an important determinant of the positioning, stability, and activity of nucleosomes, yet the molecular basis of these effects remains elusive. A "consensus DNA sequence" for nucleosome positioning has not been reported and, while certain DNA sequence preferences or motifs for nucleosome positioning have been discovered, how they function is not known. Here, we report that an unexpected observation concerning the reassembly of nucleosomes during salt gradient dialysis has allowed a breakthrough in our efforts to identify the nucleosomal locations of the DNA sequence motifs that dominate histone-DNA interactions and nucleosome positioning. We conclude that a previous selection experiment for high-affinity, nucleosome-forming DNA sequences exerted selective pressure chiefly on the central stretch of the nucleosomal DNA. This observation implies that algorithms for aligning the selected DNA sequences should seek to optimize the alignment over much less than the full 147 bp of nucleosomal DNA. A new alignment calculation implemented these ideas and successfully aligned 19 of the 41 sequences in a non-redundant database of selected high-affinity, nucleosome-positioning sequences. The resulting alignment reveals strong conservation of several stretches within a central 71 bp of the nucleosomal DNA. The alignment further reveals an inherent palindromic symmetry in the selected DNAs; it makes testable predictions of nucleosome positioning on the aligned sequences and for the creation of new positioning sequences, both of which are upheld experimentally; and it suggests new signals that may be important in translational nucleosome positioning.     

Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences.

Our laboratories recently completed SELEX experiments to isolate DNA sequences that most-strongly favor or disfavor nucleosome formation and positioning, from the entire mouse genome or from even more diverse pools of chemically synthetic random sequence DNA. Here we directly compare these selected natural and non-natural sequences. We find that the strongest natural positioning sequences have affinities for histone binding and nucleosome formation that are sixfold or more lower than those possessed by many of the selected non-natural sequences. We conclude that even the highest-affinity sequence regions of eukaryotic genomes are not evolved for the highest affinity or nucleosome positioning power. Fourier transform calculations on the selected natural sequences reveal a special significance for nucleosome positioning of a motif consisting of approximately 10 bp periodic placement of TA dinucleotide steps. Contributions to histone binding and nucleosome formation from periodic TA steps are more significant than those from other periodic steps such as AA (=TT), CC (=GG) and more important than those from the other YR steps (CA (=TG) and CG), which are reported to have greater conformational flexibility in protein-DNA complexes even than TA. We report the development of improved procedures for measuring the free energies of even stronger positioning sequences that may be isolated in the future, and show that when the favorable free energy of histone-DNA interactions becomes sufficiently large, measurements based on the widely used exchange method become unreliable.     

Nucleosome positioning on yeast plasmids is determined only by the internal signal of DNA sequence occupied by the nucleosome

The possible role of border factors in determining the nucleosome positioning on a DNA sequence was investigated. To this end a family of recombinant plasmids based on Gal10Cyc1 promoter and neomycin phosphotransferase gene NPTII were created. A DNA sequence adjoining the GalCyc promoter was varied in these plasmids. Three nearly equally represented nucleosome positions on the GalCyc promoter were found. In the basal plasmid an FRT sequence adjoins the GalCyc promoter at the right. It contains an internal signal of multiple positioning. Its replacement with different DNA sequences does not affect nucleosome positioning on the GalCyc promoter. The nucleosome positioning on the GalCyc promoter does not depend on nucleosome positioning (or its absence) on adjoining sequences. The same is true for nucleosome positioning on FRT sequence. It was found also that nucleosomes' positioning on the NPTII gene and their mutual disposition, namely the spacing between neighboring nucleosomes (linker length) are determined by the location of positioning signals only. Generally the nucleosome positioning in our experimental model is determined solely by internal DNA sequence occupied by nucleosome. On the other hand, the action of this internal positioning signal does not extend to neighboring DNA sequences.     

Nucleosome positioning based on the sequence word composition

The DNA of all eukaryotic organisms is packaged into nucleosomes (a basic repeating unit of chromatin). A nucleosome consists of histone octamer wrapped by core DNA and linker histone H1 associated with linker DNA. It has profound effects on all DNA-dependent processes by affecting sequence accessibility. Understanding the factors that influence nucleosome positioning has great help to the study of genomic control mechanism. Among many determinants, the inherent DNA sequence has been suggested to have a dominant role in nucleosome positioning in vivo. Here, we used the method of minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) feature selection and the nearest neighbor algorithm (NNA) combined with the incremental feature selection (IFS) method to identify the most important sequence features that either favor or inhibit nucleosome positioning. We analyzed the words of 53,021 nucleosome DNA sequences and 50,299 linker DNA sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 32 important features were abstracted from 5,460 features, and the overall prediction accuracy through jackknife cross-validation test was 76.5%. Our results support that sequence-dependent DNA flexibility plays an important role in positioning nucleosome core particles and that genome sequence facilitates the rapid nucleosome reassembly instead of nucleosome depletion. Besides, our results suggest that there exist some additional features playing a considerable role in discriminating nucleosome forming and inhibiting sequences. These results confirmed that the underlying DNA sequence plays a major role in nucleosome positioning.     

Sequence-dependent Nucleosome Positioning

Eukaryotic DNA is organized into a macromolecular structure called chromatin. The basic repeating unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, which consists of two copies of each of the four core histones and DNA. The nucleosomal organization and the positions of nucleosomes have profound effects on all DNA-dependent processes. Understanding the factors that influence nucleosome positioning is therefore of general interest. Among the many determinants of nucleosome positioning, the DNA sequence has been proposed to have a major role. Here, we analyzed more than 860,000 nucleosomal DNA sequences to identify sequence features that guide the formation of nucleosomes in vivo. We found that both a periodic enrichment of AT base pairs and an out-of-phase oscillating enrichment of GC base pairs as well as the overall preference for GC base pairs are determinants of nucleosome positioning. The preference for GC pairs can be related to a lower energetic cost required for deformation of the DNA to wrap around the histones. In line with this idea, we found that only incorporation of both signal components into a sequence model for nucleosome formation results in maximal predictive performance on a genome-wide scale. In this manner, one achieves greater predictive power than published approaches. Our results confirm the hypothesis that the DNA sequence has a major role in nucleosome positioning in vivo.     

Structural features of a regulatory nucleosome

DNA sequences from the long terminal repeat of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV-LTR) position nucleosomes both in vivo and in vitro. Here, were present chromatin reconstitution experiments showing that MMTV-LTR sequences from -236 to +204 accommodate two histone octamers in positions compatible with the in vivo data. This positioning is not influenced by the length of the DNA fragment and occurs in linear as well as in closed circular DNA molecules. MMTV-LTR DNA sequences show an intrinsic bendability that closely resembles its wrapping around the histone octamer. We propose that bendability is responsible for the observed rotational nucleosome positioning. Translational nucleosome positioning seems also to be determined by the DNA sequence. These data, along with the results from reconstitution experiments with insertion mutants, support a modular model of nucleosome phasing on MMTV-LTR, where the actual positioning of the histone octamer results from the additive effect of multiple features of the DNA sequence.     

AFM imaging and theoretical modeling studies of sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning

Telomeric chromatin has different features with respect to bulk chromatin, since nucleosomal repeat along the chain is unusually short. We studied the role of telomeric DNA sequences on nucleosomal spacing in a model system. Nucleosomal arrays, assembled on a 1500-bp-long human telomeric DNA and on a DNA fragment containing 8 copies of the 601 strong nucleosome positioning sequence, have been studied at the single molecule level, by atomic force microscopy imaging. Random nucleosome positioning was found in the case of human telomeric DNA. On the contrary, nucleosome positioning on 601 DNA is characterized by preferential positions of nucleosome dyad axis each 200 bp. The AFM-derived nucleosome organization is in satisfactory agreement with that predicted by theoretical modeling, based on sequence-dependent DNA curvature and flexibility. The reported results show that DNA sequence has a main role, not only in mononucleosome thermodynamic stability, but also in the organization of nucleosomal arrays.     

Computational analysis suggests a highly bendable, fragile structure for nucleosomal DNA

Eukaryotic chromosomal DNA coils around histones to form nucleosomes. Although histone affinity for DNA depends on DNA sequence patterns, how nucleosome positioning is determined by them remains unknown. Here, we show relationships between nucleosome positioning and two structural characteristics of DNA conferred by DNA sequence. Analysis of bendability and hydroxyl radical cleavage intensity of nucleosomal DNA sequences indicated that nucleosomal DNA is bendable and fragile and that nucleosome positional stability was correlated with characteristics of DNA. This result explains how histone positioning is partially determined by nucleosomal DNA structure, illuminating the optimization of chromosomal DNA packaging that controls cellular dynamics.     

Nucleosome phasing in Tetrahymena macronuclei

Core-protected DNA can drive only 60% of the Tetrahymena thermophila macronuclear genome into duplexes in hybridization experiments. This core-protected DNA therefore contains only a subset of the genome complexity. We interpret this to mean that a large fraction, if not all, of the genome is phased with respect to nucleosome placement. Among the sequences present in total DNA and absent from core-protected DNA are most of the sequences containing N6-methyladenine (MeAde) residues, consistent with our previous demonstration that most of these residues lie in linker DNA. We show that these results are not due to artifacts resulting from the small size of the DNA driver, nor are they due to any sequence preferences exhibited by staphylococcal (staph) nuclease. This is the first evidence that nucleosome phasing may be a bulk genome characteristic.     

Re-cracking the nucleosome positioning code

Nucleosomes, the fundamental repeating subunits of all eukaryotic chromatin, are responsible for packaging DNA into chromosomes inside the cell nucleus and controlling gene expression. While it has been well established that nucleosomes exhibit higher affinity for select DNA sequences, until recently it was unclear whether such preferences exerted a significant, genome-wide effect on nucleosome positioning in vivo. This question was seemingly and recently resolved in the affirmative: a wide-ranging series of experimental and computational analyses provided extensive evidence that the instructions for wrapping DNA around nucleosomes are contained in the DNA itself. This subsequently labeled second genetic code was based on data-driven, structural, and biophysical considerations. It was subjected to an extensive suite of validation procedures, with one conclusion being that intrinsic, genome-encoded, nucleosome organization explains approximately 50% of in vivo nucleosome positioning. Here, we revisit both the nature of the underlying sequence preferences, and the performance of the proposed code. A series of new analyses, employing spectral envelope (Fourier transform) methods for assessing key sequence periodicities, classification techniques for evaluating predictive performance, and discriminatory motif finding methods for devising alternate models, are applied. The findings from the respective analyses indicate that signature dinucleotide periodicities are absent from the bulk of the high affinity nucleosome-bound sequences, and that the predictive performance of the code is modest. We conclude that further exploration of the role of sequence-based preferences in genome-wide nucleosome positioning is warranted. This work offers a methodologic counterpart to a recent, high resolution determination of nucleosome positioning that also questions the accuracy of the proposed code and, further, provides illustrations of techniques useful in assessing sequence periodicity and predictive performance.     

Nucleosome Phasing in Tetrahymena Macronuclei1

Core-protected DNA can drive only 60% of the Tetrahymena thermophila macronuclear genome into duplexes in hybridization experiments. This core-protected DNA therefore contains only a subset of the genome complexity. We interpret this to mean that a large fraction, if not all, of the genome is phased with respect to nucleosome placement. Among the sequences present in total DNA and absent from core-protected DNA are most of the sequences containing N⁶-methyladenine (MeAde) residues, consistent with our previous demonstration that most of these residues lie in linker DNA. We show that these results are not due to artifacts resulting from the small size of the DNA driver, nor are they due to any sequence preferences exhibited by staphylococcal (staph) nuclease. This is the first evidence that nucleosome phasing may be a bulk genome characteristic.     

Crystal Structures of Nucleosome Core Particles Containing the ‘601’ Strong Positioning Sequence

Nucleosome positioning plays a key role in genomic regulation by defining histone-DNA context and by modulating access to specific sites. Moreover, the histone-DNA register influences the double-helix structure, which in turn can affect the association of small molecules and protein factors. Analysis of genomic and synthetic DNA has revealed sequence motifs that direct nucleosome positioning in vitro; thus, establishing the basis for the DNA sequence dependence of positioning would shed light on the mechanics of the double helix and its contribution to chromatin structure in vivo. However, acquisition of well-diffracting nucleosome core particle (NCP) crystals is extremely dependent on the DNA fragment used for assembly, and all previous NCP crystal structures have been based on human α-satellite sequences. Here, we describe the crystal structures of Xenopus NCPs containing one of the strongest known histone octamer binding and positioning sequences, the so-called ‘601’ DNA.Two distinct 145-bp 601 crystal forms display the same histone-DNA register, which coincides with the occurrence of DNA stretching-overtwisting in both halves of the particle around five double-helical turns from the nucleosome center, giving the DNA an ‘effective length’ of 147 bp. As we have found previously with stretching around two turns from the nucleosome center for a centromere-based sequence, the terminal stretching observed in the 601 constructs is associated with extreme kinking into the minor groove at purine-purine (pyrimidine-pyrimidine) dinucleotide steps. In other contexts, these step types display an overall nonflexible behavior, which raises the possibility that DNA stretching in the nucleosome or extreme distortions in general have unique sequence dependency characteristics. Our findings indicate that DNA stretching is an intrinsically predisposed site-specific property of the nucleosome and suggest how NCP crystal structures with diverse DNA sequences can be obtained.     

基于核小体位置预测的酵母进化印迹研究

在利用核小体定位实验数据训练支持向量机(SVM)对任意酵母DNA序列的核小体形成能力进行预测的过程中,发现染色质结构对基因组DNA分子进化过程有着显著影响。我们观察到核小体DNA比连接DNA的平均预测准确率低15%,这种普遍存在的局部预测准确率差异性代表了酵母核小体定位的进化印迹(Evolutionary footprint),它揭示了核小体组织在基因组的整个进化过程中所具有的保守性。     

DNA rotational positioning in a regulatory nucleosome is determined by base sequence. An algorithm to model the preferred superhelix.

MMTV-LTR sequences -190/-45 position a histone octamer both in vivo and in vitro. Experimental evidence suggested that nucleosome rotational positioning is determined by the DNA sequence itself. We developed an algorithm that is able to predict the most favorable path of a given DNA sequence over a histone octamer, based on rotational preferences of different dinucleotides. Our analysis shows that these preferences are sufficient for explaining the observed rotational positioning of the MMTV-LTR nucleosome, at one base pair accuracy level. Computer-generated 3-D models of the experimentally calculated and predicted MMTV-LTR nucleosome show that the predicted orientation is fully compatible with the currently available data in terms of accessibility of relevant sequences to regulatory proteins.     

Oligonucleotide Sequence Motifs as Nucleosome Positioning Signals

To gain a better understanding of the sequence patterns that characterize positioned nucleosomes, we first performed an analysis of the periodicities of the 256 tetranucleotides in a yeast genome-wide library of nucleosomal DNA sequences that was prepared by in vitro reconstitution. The approach entailed the identification and analysis of 24 unique tetranucleotides that were defined by 8 consensus sequences. These consensus sequences were shown to be responsible for most if not all of the tetranucleotide and dinucleotide periodicities displayed by the entire library, demonstrating that the periodicities of dinucleotides that characterize the yeast genome are, in actuality, due primarily to the 8 consensus sequences. A novel combination of experimental and bioinformatic approaches was then used to show that these tetranucleotides are important for preferred formation of nucleosomes at specific sites along DNA in vitro. These results were then compared to tetranucleotide patterns in genome-wide in vivo libraries from yeast and C. elegans in order to assess the contributions of DNA sequence in the control of nucleosome residency in the cell. These comparisons revealed striking similarities in the tetranucleotide occurrence profiles that are likely to be involved in nucleosome positioning in both in vitro and in vivo libraries, suggesting that DNA sequence is an important factor in the control of nucleosome placement in vivo. However, the strengths of the tetranucleotide periodicities were 3–4 fold higher in the in vitro as compared to the in vivo libraries, which implies that DNA sequence plays less of a role in dictating nucleosome positions in vivo. The results of this study have important implications for models of sequence-dependent positioning since they suggest that a defined subset of tetranucleotides is involved in preferred nucleosome occupancy and that these tetranucleotides are the major source of the dinucleotide periodicities that are characteristic of positioned nucleosomes.