首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 485 毫秒
1.
目的:对本地区乳腺癌患者癌组织进行人乳头瘤病毒(HPv)检测,对HPV亚型与乳腺癌的相关性进行研究。方法:选择本地区2010年1月-2013年1月182例乳腺癌患者作为研究组,同时选择30例乳腺良性肿瘤患者作为对照组,均分型基因芯片检测系统对提取的DNA进行分型检测。观察两组患者HPV感染情况及感染亚型。结果:两组患者HPV阳性病例67例,其中研究组阳性66例,阳性率为36.26%,对照组阳性1例,阳性率为3-33%;研究组阳性率明显高于对照组,两组比较差异具有显著性(P〈0.05)。亚型检测结果显示,共检出7种HPV亚型,其中高危型5种,分别为HPV16、HPV18、HPV58、HPV51和HPV56型,低危型两种,分别为HPV6、11两种。研究组高危型61例,低危型5例,对照组1例为HPV6。Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期乳腺癌患者HPV阳性率分别为16.28%、19.71%、62%、100%,Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期患者的阳性率明显高于Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期,不同分期阳性率比较差异具有显著性(P〈0.05)。结论:乳腺癌患者癌组织中HPV阳性率明显偏高,且绝大多数为高危亚型,而且HPV阳性率与病理分期呈正相关,说明本地区HPV感染与乳腺癌的发生与发展具有一定的相关性,两者的相关性还有待进一步探索。  相似文献   

2.
摘要 目的:探讨人乳头状瘤病毒(HPV)检测联合人髓细胞增生原癌基因(C-MYC)检测对宫颈癌前病变-宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)筛查的临床价值。方法:选择2018年6月至2020年12月在本院妇科保存的宫颈上皮内瘤变标本140份,采用免疫组化法检测C-MYC表达情况,采用PCR检测HPV16、HPV18表达情况并进行相关性分析。结果:在140份标本中,HPV16与HPV18的阳性率为62.9 %与61.4 %;CIN 1级标本HPV16、HPV18阳性率分别为26.8 %和24.4 %,2级标本分别为62.7 %和58.8 %,3级标本分别为93.8 %和95.8 %,对比有差异(P<0.05)。C-MYC阳性率为83.6 %,不同CIN分级程度的标本组织中C-MYC阳性率对比有差异(P<0.05)。Spearsman相关分析显示HPV16、HPV18、C-MYC阳性率与CIN分级呈相关性(P<0.05)。二分类Logisitc回归分析显示HPV16、HPV18、C-MYC阳性率都为影响CIN分级的重要危险因素(P<0.05)。结论:随着宫颈上皮内瘤变级别的增加,HPV16、HPV18的阳性率也在升高,同时伴随C-MYC的过表达,两者具有相关性,是导致患者病情加重的重要危险因素。  相似文献   

3.
目的:探讨高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染对宫颈病变组织干扰素-r(IFN-r)、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)的影响。方法:收集我 院2013 年1 月到2015 年1 月妇科门诊行宫颈活检患者150 例,根据病理检查结果,将患者分为观察组(宫颈癌33 例、CINⅠ期 26 例、CINⅡ期28 例、CINⅢ期23 例)110 例,对照组(慢性宫颈炎患者)40 例。提取两组患者宫颈组织标本,检测观察组 HPV-DNA、HPV 分型,及两组IFN-r、IL-10 蛋白及mRNA 表达,分析高危型HPV感染与宫颈病变组织IFN-r、IL-10 表达的关系。 结果:观察组HPV-DNA阳性87 例(79.1%),其中HPV16 型47 例(42.7%)、HPV18 型20 例(18.2%)感染率最高;且HPV16、18 感 染率在CINⅠ期、CINⅡ期、CINⅢ期以及宫颈癌组中的感染率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),Spearman相关性分析显示,HPV16、 18 与宫颈病变程度均呈现正相关关系(r=0.896,0.786;均P<0.05)。IFN-r、IL-10 表达水平在CINⅠ期、CINⅡ期、CINⅢ期、宫颈 癌、对照组表达水平差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),Spearman 相关性分析显示,IFN-r与宫颈病变程度呈现负相关关系(r=-0. 567,P<0.05),IL-10 呈现正相关关系(r=0.678,P<0.05)。且HPV16、HPV18 感染率与IFN-r表达呈现负相关关系(rHPV16/18=-0. 678,-0.675,均P<0.05),与IL-10 呈现正相关关系(rHPV16/18=0.582,0.778,均P<0.05)。结论:IFN-r表达随着宫颈病变加重或者 HPV16、HPV18 感染率升高逐渐降低,IL-10 则逐渐升高。  相似文献   

4.
摘要 目的:根据青海地区妇女宫颈人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测结果,分析宫颈高危HPV(HR-HPV)感染分布特点,为指导HPV疫苗接种提供理论依据。方法:采用Hybriuax技术检测21种高危型HPV亚型,对2014年1月-2020年2月于我院就诊的46273例女性宫颈人乳头瘤病毒分型检测。结果:46273例妇女中,高危HPV阳性率10.23%,高危HPV阳性率和年龄之间存在线性趋势,随年龄的增大感染比例上升。单一高危亚型HPV感染前三位的HPV亚型为16、58和39,合计占到45.64%。HPV亚型感染以单高危阳性为主,占总HPV阳性数的88.26%,占全部筛查人数的9.03%。HPV16、58、31、68亚型阳性率和年龄段之间存在线性趋势,随年龄的增大感染比例上升。HPV感染亚型检出构成比各年龄段均以HPV16感染排在第一位,排在第二位除61-70岁为双高危外,均为HPV58为主。结论:青海地区女性HPV感染率较高,以单一高危型感染为主,HPV16、58、39、52是主要的感染亚型,所以应针对青海地区HPV感染状况设计具有针对性的预防HPV感染亚型的疫苗。  相似文献   

5.
目的 分析宫颈癌患者人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染情况及癌灶组织内干扰素基因刺激因子(STING)、E盒锌指结合蛋白1(ZEB1)表达情况,为该类患者的治疗提供参考。方法 收集我院病理检验科2019年1月至2022年1月63例宫颈癌标本(宫颈癌组)、55例宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)标本(CIN组)及50例正常宫颈标本(正常组),采用免疫组化法检测各标本内STING及ZEB1表达情况,采用原位杂交法检测各标本内高危HPV感染情况,分析STING及ZEB1蛋白表达情况与宫颈癌病理特征及高危HPV感染之间的关系。结果 宫颈癌组标本STING及ZEB1表达量均高于CIN组及正常组,CIN组标本ZEB1表达量高于正常组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);CIN组标本STING表达量与正常组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。宫颈癌组标本HPV16、18检出率高于CIN组及正常组,CIN组标本HPV16、18检出率高于正常组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。宫颈癌患者FIGO分期及浸润深度与其组织内STING及ZEB1蛋白阳性情况均存在相关性;此外,宫颈癌淋巴结转移及肿瘤分...  相似文献   

6.
目的:探讨分析CDH1基因启动子甲基化与宫颈癌临床病理类型的关系。方法:选取2012年5月~2015年7月我院105例宫颈癌患者为宫颈癌组,同时选取60例正常宫颈组织为正常组,以甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应(MSP)检测CDH1基因启动子Cp G岛甲基化状态及高危型HPV DNA状态,分析CDH1基因甲基化状态与高危型HPV DNA状态及临床病理参数的关系。结果:宫颈癌组CDH1基因启动子甲基化阳性率为56.19%,明显高于正常组的6.67%,具有统计学差异(P0.05);宫颈癌组的高危型HPV DNA阳性率为84.76%,明显高于正常组的20.00%,具有统计学差异(P0.05);高危型HPV DNA与CDH1基因启动子甲基化的一致性分析结果具有统计学意义(P0.05);CDH1基因启动子甲基化率与患者的WHO组织分化程度分级、FIGO分期、组织病理学分型、肿瘤大小有关,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:宫颈癌CDH1基因启动子甲基化与WHO组织分化程度分级、FIGO分期、组织病理学分型、肿瘤大小具有关联,并与高危型HPV DNA阳性具有一致性,可以作为宫颈癌诊断和预后评估的参考指标。  相似文献   

7.
目的了解泰顺地区女性易感人群人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染率和HPV亚型分型情况。方法收集2017年1月至2017年12月于泰顺县人民医院体检及就诊的女性患者泌尿生殖道标本,共5434例。采用PCR反向点杂交法进行HPV分型检测,并对结果进行分析。结果5434例标本中HPV阳性1895例,HPV阳性1309人次。高危型HPV检出1127例,占59.4%;低危型HPV检出356例,占18.8%。入选患者中单一感染935例,占71.4%;多重感染374例,占28.6%。高危型中检出最多的是HPV52型,共210例,占11.1%;其次是HPV58型137例,占7.2%;HPV16型124例,占6.5%;HPV18型62例,占3.3%。HPV52阳性患者集中于41~50岁,HPV53阳性患者集中于31~40岁,HPV16、HPV18阳性患者集中于20~40岁及>60岁。随着患者年龄的增长各HPV亚型的阳性率也在增长,且各年龄段患者均以高危型HPV感染为主(62.36%)。结论泰顺地区女性患者HPV亚型及患者年龄分布情况与我国南方女性HPV感染情况相符,HPV感染率随患者年龄增加而增高。高危型HPV检测对子宫颈癌等相关疾病的筛查及预防具有较高的应用价值。  相似文献   

8.
目的观察Snail mRNA及其蛋白、E-cadherin蛋白在胃癌组织中的表达及其与胃癌临床病理特征的关系,并探讨它们在胃癌发生、发展中的作用及其临床应用价值。方法收集96例手术切除胃癌标本,同时取80例癌旁组织作为对照。应用免疫组织化学S-P法检测胃癌组织、癌旁组织中snail蛋白、E-cadherin蛋白的表达;运用原位分子杂交技术检测胃癌组织、癌旁组织中Snail mRNA的表达。结果(1)Snail蛋白在胃癌组织阳性率(83.3%)显著高于癌旁组织(41.25%)(P〈0.05);高、中分化组Snail蛋白阳性表达率显著低于低分化组(P〈0.05);Snail蛋白的阳性表达率在乳头状腺癌、管状腺癌及低分化腺癌与黏液癌之间差异有显著性(P〈0.05);Snail蛋白的表达与胃癌浸润深度、淋巴结转移及远处转移有关(P〈0.05),与性别、年龄、肿瘤大小、肿瘤部位及临床分期无关(P〉0.05);(2)胃癌组织中snail mR-NA的阳性率(76%)显著高于癌旁组织(30%)(P〈0.05);高、中分化组Snail mRNA阳性表达率显著低于低分化组(P〈0.05);Snail mRNA的阳性表达率在乳头状腺癌、管状腺癌及低分化腺癌与黏液癌之间差异有显著性(P〈0.05);Snail mRNA的表达与浸润深度及淋巴结转移有关(P〈0.05),与性别、年龄、肿瘤大小、肿瘤部位、临床分期及远处转移无关(P〉0.05);(3)E-cadherin蛋白在胃癌组织阳性率(37.5%)显著低于癌旁组织(100%)(P〈0.05);高、中分化组E-cadherin蛋白阳性率显著高于低分化组(P〈0.05);E-cadherin蛋白阳性率在乳头状腺癌、管状腺癌及低分化腺癌与黏液癌之间差异有显著性(P〈0.05);E-cadherin蛋白的表达与胃癌浸润深度、淋巴结转移、临床分期及远处转移有关(P〈0.05),与性别、年龄、肿瘤大小、肿瘤部位均无关(P〉0.05);(4)胃癌组织中snail mRNA和snail蛋白的表达呈正相关(r=0.594,P〈0.05);Snail蛋白和E-cadherin蛋白的表达呈负相关(r=-0.234,P〈0.05)。结论(1)E-cadher-in蛋白低表达与Snail蛋白高表达可能是胃黏膜恶性转变以及胃癌发生浸润转移的重要生物学标志;联合检测E-cadherin蛋白与Snail蛋白对预测胃癌浸润转移有重要意义。(2)Snail蛋白可能在转录水平上调控E-cadherin蛋白的表达。  相似文献   

9.
摘要 目的:探讨鼻咽癌组织环氧化酶-2(COX-2)、琥珀酸脱氢酶(SDHB)、热休克蛋白90β(HSP90β)表达与临床病理特征及预后的关系。方法:应用免疫组织化学染色法对78例鼻咽癌组织和65例鼻咽部慢性炎症组织中COX-2、SDHB、HSP90β表达情况进行检测,并分析鼻咽癌组织中COX-2、SDHB、HSP90β表达与临床病理特征的关系及其相关性。所有患者随访3年,根据不同COX-2、SDHB、HSP90β表达情况将患者分为COX-2阳性组、COX-2阴性组、SDHB阳性组、SDHB阴性组、HSP90β阳性组、HSP90β阴性组,比较各组患者生存情况。结果:鼻咽癌组织中COX-2、HSP90β阳性率显著高于鼻咽部慢性炎症组织,SDHB阳性率显著低于鼻咽部慢性炎症组织(P<0.05)。TNM分期为III+IV期、中低分化、有颈淋巴结转移者鼻咽癌组织中COX-2、HSP90β阳性率显著高于TNM分期为I+II期、高分化、无颈淋巴结转移者,SDHB阳性率显著低于TNM分期为I+II期、高分化、无颈淋巴结转移者(P<0.05)。Spearman相关分析显示,鼻咽癌组织中COX-2表达与SDHB表达呈负相关(rs=-0.462, P=0.008),与HSP90β表达呈正相关(rs=0.501, P=0.000),HSP90?茁表达与SDHB表达呈负相关(rs=-0.438, P=0.012)。随访3年,存活49例,死亡29例,存活率62.82%。鼻咽癌组织COX-2阴性组、SDHB阳性组、HSP90β阴性组患者生存率、中位生存期显著优于COX-2阳性组、SDHB阴性组、HSP90β阳性组患者(P<0.05)。结论:鼻咽癌组织中COX-2、SDHB、HSP90β表达情况与患者TNM分期、肿瘤分化情况和颈淋巴结转移相关,且其表达情况与鼻咽癌患者生存期有密切关系。  相似文献   

10.
目的研究HPV分型及其高危亚型与宫颈病变程度的关系。方法采用HPV基因分型技术对2014年7月至2015年8月在广州中医药大学第一附属医院妇科门诊就诊和体检的3 142例患者进行HPV分型检测,其中327例患者进行宫颈病理检查,分析高危型HPV感染与宫颈病变程度的关系。结果 3 142例受检对象中,21种HPV型别均被检测出,阳性检出者共969例,总检出率为30.80%,其中高危型741例,检出率为23.58%。随着宫颈病变级别的升高,高危型HPV阳性率也相应升高(P0.05),HPV16型感染阳性者宫颈癌发生率最高(P0.05)。高危型HPV阳性者中单一感染和多重感染与宫颈病变程度无关(P0.05)。结论高危型HPV亚型检测在宫颈病变预防和诊治中具有重要意义。  相似文献   

11.
12.
13.
14.
On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta   总被引:10,自引:0,他引:10  
The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.  相似文献   

15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor  相似文献   

20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号