Localization and structure of snRNPs during mitosis. Immunofluorescent and biochemical studies

The distribution of U snRNAs during mitosis was studied by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy with snRNA cap-specific anti-m3G antibodies. Whereas the snRNAs are strictly nuclear at late prophase, they become distributed in the cell plasm at metaphase and anaphase. They re-enter the newly formed nuclei of the two daughter cells at early telophase, producing speckled nuclear fluorescent patterns typical of interphase cells. While the snRNAs become concentrated at the rim of the condensing chromosomes and at interchromosomal regions at late prophase, essentially no association of the snRNAs was observed with the condensed chromosomes during metaphase and anaphase. Independent immunofluorescent studies with anti-(U1)RNP autoantibodies, which react specifically with proteins unique to the U1 snRNP species, showed the same distribution of snRNP antigens during mitosis as was observed with the snRNA-specific anti-m3G antibody. Immunoprecipitation studies with anti-(U1)RNP and anti-Sm autoantibodies, as well as protein analysis of snRNPs isolated from extracts of mitotic cells, demonstrate that the snRNAs remain associated in a specific manner with the same set of proteins during interphase and mitosis. The concept that the overall structure of the snRNPs is maintained during mitosis also applies to the coexistence of the snRNAs U4 and U6 in a single ribonucleoprotein complex. Particle sedimentation studies in sucrose gradients reveal that most of the snRNPs present in sonicates of mitotic cells do not sediment as free RNP particles, but remain associated with high molecular weight (HMW) structures other than chromatin, most probably with hnRNA/RNP.     

In vivo detection of snRNP-rich organelles in the nuclei of mammalian cells.

The in vivo distribution of snRNPs has been analysed by microinjecting fluorochrome-labelled antisense probes into the nuclei of live HeLa and 3T3 cells. Probes for U2 and U5 snRNAs specifically label the same discrete nuclear foci while a probe for U1 snRNA shows widespread nucleoplasmic labelling, excluding nucleoli, in addition to labelling foci. A probe for U3 snRNA specifically labels nucleoli. These in vivo data confirm that mammalian cells have nuclear foci which contain spliceosomal snRNPs. Co-localization studies, both in vivo and in situ, demonstrate that the spliceosomal snRNAs are present in the same nuclear foci. These foci are also stained by antibodies which recognize snRNP proteins, m3G-cap structures and the splicing factor U2AF but are not stained by anti-SC-35 or anti-La antibodies. U1 snRNP and the splicing factor U2AF closely co-localize in the nucleus, both before and after actinomycin D treatment, suggesting that they may both be part of the same complex in vivo.     

5'-terminal caps of snRNAs are accessible for reaction with 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine-specific antibody in intact snRNPs

Immune precipitation assays with antibodies specific for 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine (m2,2,7(3)G) have been used to study the accessibility of the 5'-terminal m2,2,7(3)G-containing caps of eucaryotic small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) either as naked RNAs or in intact small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNPs). The antibody selectively precipitates snRNA species U1a, U1b, U2, U4, and U5 from total deproteinized RNA isolated from Ehrlich ascites cells. Binding by the antibody occurs via the m2,2,7(3)G moiety of the snRNAs' caps, since complex formation with the antibody can be completely abolished by excess nucleoside m2,2,7(3)G. The specificity of the antibody is further demonstrated by the complete absence of reaction with deproteinized snRNA species U6, the 5' terminus of which does not contain m2,2,7(3)G. Most importantly, the cap structures of the snRNAs U1a, U1b, U2, U4, and U5 are also accessible for anti-m2,2,7(3)G IgGs when intact snRNPs are reacted with the antibody. In this case, snRNP species U6 is coprecipitated, suggesting that there are intermolecular interactions between this and other snRNPs. Our data demonstrate that the 5'-terminal regions of the above snRNAs are not protected by the snRNP proteins. This finding is of special interest for snRNP species U1, and is discussed in terms of a model which proposes that the 5'-terminal region of U1 participates in the proper alignment of splice junctions in eucaryotic pre-mRNAs (Lerner, M. R., Boyle, J.A., Mount, S.M., Wolin, S.L., and Steitz, J. A. (1980) Nature (Lond.) 283, 220-224).     

Polypeptide components of Drosophila small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles.

In eukaryotes splicing of pre-mRNAs is mediated by the spliceosome, a dynamic complex of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) that associate transiently during spliceosome assembly and the splicing reaction. We have purified snRNPs from nuclear extracts of Drosophila cells by affinity chromatography with an antibody specific for the trimethylguanosine (m3G) cap structure of snRNAs U1-U5. The polypeptide components of Drosophila snRNPs have been characterized and shown to consist of a number of proteins shared by all the snRNPs, and some proteins which appear to be specific to individual snRNP particles. On the basis of their apparent molecular weight and antigenicity many of these common and particle specific Drosophila snRNP proteins are remarkably conserved between Drosophila and human spliceosomes. By probing western blots of the Drosophila snRNP polypeptides with a number of antisera raised against human snRNP proteins, Drosophila polypeptides equivalent to many of the HeLa snRNP-common proteins have been identified, as well as candidates for a number of U1, U2 and U5-specific proteins.     

U1 small nuclear RNA variants differentially form ribonucleoprotein particles in vitro

The U1 small nuclear (sn)RNA participates in splicing of pre-mRNAs by recognizing and binding to 5′ splice sites at exon/intron boundaries. U1 snRNAs associate with 5′ splice sites in the form of ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) that are comprised of the U1 snRNA and 10 core components, including U1A, U1-70K, U1C and the ‘Smith antigen’, or Sm, heptamer. The U1 snRNA is highly conserved across a wide range of taxa; however, a number of reports have identified the presence of expressed U1-like snRNAs in multiple species, including humans. While numerous U1-like molecules have been shown to be expressed, it is unclear whether these variant snRNAs have the capacity to form snRNPs and participate in splicing. The purpose of the present study was to further characterize biochemically the ability of previously identified human U1-like variants to form snRNPs and bind to U1 snRNP proteins. A bioinformatics analysis provided support for the existence of multiple expressed variants. In vitro gel shift assays, competition assays, and immunoprecipitations (IPs) revealed that the variants formed high molecular weight assemblies to varying degrees and associated with core U1 snRNP proteins to a lesser extent than the canonical U1 snRNA. Together, these data suggest that the human U1 snRNA variants analyzed here are unable to efficiently bind U1 snRNP proteins. The current work provides additional biochemical insights into the ability of the variants to assemble into snRNPs.     

Evidence for the existence of snRNAs U4 and U6 in a single ribonucleoprotein complex and for their association by intermolecular base pairing

Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) from eucaryotic cells can be fractionated on affinity columns prepared with antibodies of high affinity for 2,2,7-trimethyl-guanosine (m3G), which is present in the 5'-terminal caps of the snRNAs. While the snRNPs U1, U2 and U5 are eluted with the nucleoside m3G in the presence of 0.1 M salt, the snRNP species U4 and U6 are only desorbed when the salt concentration is increased. The same fractionation pattern was likewise observed for snRNPs from HeLa or Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Since U6 RNA lacks the m3G residue and its RNA does not react with anti-m3G, its co-chromatography with U4 RNP on anti-m3G affinity columns suggests either that discrete snRNPs U4 and U6 are intimately associated in nuclear extracts or that both RNAs are organized in one ribonucleoprotein particle. Further evidence for a U4/U6 RNP particle is obtained by sedimentation studies with purified snRNPs in sucrose gradients. Gel fractionation of RNAs shows identical distributions of snRNAs U4 and U6 in the gradient, and the U4/U6 RNP particle sediments faster than the snRNPs U1 or U2. Physical association between snRNPs U4 and U6 during sedimentation is shown by their co-precipitation with anti-m3G IgG from the gradient fractions. Finally, experimental evidence is provided that snRNAs U4 and U6 are associated by intermolecular base pairing in the U4/U6 RNP particle, as demonstrated by our finding that anti-m3G IgG co-precipitates U6 RNA with U4 RNA following phenolization of U4/U6 RNPs at 0 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of U snRNPs: definition of a nuclear location signal in the Sm core domain that binds a transport receptor independently of the m3G cap.

We have investigated the nuclear transport of U1 and U5 snRNPs by microinjection studies in oocytes from Xenopus laevis using snRNP particles prepared by reconstitution in vitro. Competition studies with snRNPs showed that the Sm core domain of U1 snRNPs contains a nuclear location signal that acts independently of the m3G cap. The transport of U1 snRNP can be blocked by saturation with competitor U1 snRNPs or by U5 snRNPs, which indicates that the signals on the respective Sm core domains interact with the same transport receptors. Further, by using a minimal U1 snRNP particle reconstituted in vitro and containing only the Sm core RNP domain and lacking stem-loops I to III of U1 RNA, we show that this is targeted actively to the nucleus, in spite of the absence of the m3G cap. This indicates that under certain conditions the NLS in the Sm core domain not only is an essential, but may also be a sufficient condition for nuclear targeting. We propose that the RNA structure of a given snRNP particle determines at least in part whether the particle's m3G cap is required for nuclear transport or can be dispensed with.     

Purification of snRNPs U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6 with 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine-specific antibody and definition of their constituent proteins reacting with anti-Sm and anti-(U1)RNP antisera

Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) of the U-snRNP class from Ehrlich ascites tumor cells were purified in a one-step procedure by affinity chromatography with antibodies specific for 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine (m23.2.7G), which is part of the 5'-terminal cap structure of snRNAs U1-U5. Antibody-bound snRNPs are desorbed from the affinity column by elution with excess nucleoside m23.2.7G; this guarantees maintenance of their native structure. The snRNPs U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6 can be recovered quantitatively from nuclear extracts by this procedure. Co-isolation of U6 snRNP must be due to interactions between this and other snRNPs, as anti-m23.2.7G antibodies do not react with deproteinized U6 snRNA. We have so far defined nine proteins of approximate mol. wts. 10 000, 12 000, 13 000, 16 000, 21 000, 28 000, 32 000, 34 000 and 75 000. Purified snRNPs react with anti-(U1)RNP and with anti-Sm antisera from patients with mixed connective tissue disease and from MRL/l mice. As determined by the protein blotting technique, six of the snRNP polypeptides, characterized by apparent mol. wts. 13 000, 16 000, 21 000, 28 000, 34 000 and 75 000, bear antigenic determinants for one or the other of the above autoantibody classes. This suggests strongly that the U-snRNPs produced by the procedure described here are indeed representative of the snRNPs in the cell. With highly purified snRNPs available, investigation of possible enzymic functions of the particles may now be undertaken.     

Antibodies specific for N6-methyladenosine react with intact snRNPs U2 and U4/U6

Antibodies specific for N6-methyladenosine (m6A) were elicited in rabbits and used to study the accessibility in intact snRNPs of the m6A residues present in the snRNAs U2, U4 and U6. The antibody quantitatively precipitates snRNPs U2 and U4/U6 from total nucleoplasmic snRNPs U1-U6 isolated from HeLa cells, which demonstrates that the m6A residues of the respective snRNAs are not protected by snRNP proteins in the snRNP particles. While the anti-m6A IgG does not react at all with U5 RNPs lacking m6A, a significant amount of U1 RNPs was co-precipitated despite the fact that U1 RNA does not contain m6A either. Since anti-m6A IgG does not react with purified U1 RNPs and co-precipitation of U1 RNPs is dependent on the presence of U2 RNPs but not of U4/U6 RNPs, these data indicate an interaction between snRNPs U1 and U2 in vitro. The anti-m6A precipitation pattern described above was also observed with snRNPs isolation from mouse Ehrlich ascites tumor cells, indicating similar three-dimensional arrangements of snRNAs in homologous snRNP particles from different organisms.     

Detection of intranuclear clusters of Sm antigens with monoclonal anti-Sm antibodies by immunoelectron microscopy

It has been shown that small nuclear RNA (snRNA) species U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 are found in the nucleus in the form of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and that anti-Sm antibodies react with snRNP polypeptides, which are associated with all five snRNAs. We report here a novel intranuclear complex, denoted “Sm cluster,” detected by immunostaining with monoclonal anti-Sm antibodies in HeLa cells.     

The SMN complex is associated with snRNPs throughout their cytoplasmic assembly pathway

The common neurodegenerative disease spinal muscular atrophy is caused by reduced levels of the survival of motor neurons (SMN) protein. SMN associates with several proteins (Gemin2 to Gemin6) to form a large complex which is found both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus. The SMN complex functions in the assembly and metabolism of several RNPs, including spliceosomal snRNPs. The snRNP core assembly takes place in the cytoplasm from Sm proteins and newly exported snRNAs. Here, we identify three distinct cytoplasmic SMN complexes, each representing a defined intermediate in the snRNP biogenesis pathway. We show that the SMN complex associates with newly exported snRNAs containing the nonphosphorylated form of the snRNA export factor PHAX. The second SMN complex identified contains assembled Sm cores and m(3)G-capped snRNAs. Finally, the SMN complex is associated with a preimport complex containing m(3)G-capped snRNP cores bound to the snRNP nuclear import mediator snurportin1. Thus, the SMN complex is associated with snRNPs during the entire process of their biogenesis in the cytoplasm and may have multiple functions throughout this process.     

The trimethylguanosine cap structure of U1 snRNA is a component of a bipartite nuclear targeting signal

The ability of series of U1 snRNAs and U6 snRNAs to migrate into the nucleus of Xenopus oocytes after injection into the cytoplasm was analyzed. The U snRNAs were made either by injecting U snRNA genes into the nucleus of oocytes or, synthetically, by T7 RNA polymerase, incorporating a variety of cap structures. The results indicate that nuclear targeting of U1 snRNA requires both a trimethylguanosine cap structure and binding of at least one common U snRNP protein. Using synthetic U6 snRNAs, it is further demonstrated that the trimethylguanosine cap structure can act in nuclear targeting in the absence of the common U snRNP proteins. These results imply that U snRNP nuclear targeting signals are of a modular nature.     

Cross-linking of U2 snRNA using nitrogen mustard. Evidence for higher order structure.

Nuclear mRNA precursors are spliced by a large macromolecular complex called the spliceosome which contains, in most eucaryotes, five small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) each in the form of a small ribonucleoprotein particle (the U1, U2, U5, and U4/U6 snRNPs). Although secondary structures have been derived for all five spliceosomal snRNAs based on phylogenetic, biochemical, and genetic data, little tertiary structure information is available. Here we use the general cross-linking reagent nitrogen mustard [bis-(2-chloroethyl)methylamine] to detect tertiary interactions within U2 snRNA. After the cross-linking of deproteinized HeLa nuclear extract, two intramolecularly cross-linked U2 species with anomalous electrophoretic mobility can be detected (X-U2#1 and X-U2#2). The 3' and 5' boundaries of each cross-link were determined by rapid enzymatic RNA sequencing of end-labeled RNA. X-U2#1 is cross-linked between the region U41-U55 and G105 or G106, X-U2#2 between U53 and G97 or G98. We then tested the ability of the two cross-linked species to bind snRNP proteins in vitro (in nuclear extract or S100) and in vivo (in Xenopus oocytes). X-U2#2 reconstituted efficiently both in vitro and in vivo but X-U2#1 did not, as judged by immunoprecipitation with antibodies specific for Sm- and U2-specific proteins. Since the cross-link in X-U2#2 involves the Sm binding site but does not block snRNP assembly, our data strongly suggest that the Sm binding site lies on the surface of the native snRNP.     

A 69-kD protein that associates reversibly with the Sm core domain of several spliceosomal snRNP species

The biogenesis of the spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) U1, U2, U4, and U5 involves: (a) migration of the snRNA molecules from the nucleus to the cytoplasm; (b) assembly of a group of common proteins (Sm proteins) and their binding to a region on the snRNAs called the Sm-binding site; and (c) translocation of the RNP back to the nucleus. A first prerequisite for understanding the assembly pathway and nuclear transport of the snRNPs in more detail is the knowledge of all the snRNP proteins that play essential roles in these processes. We have recently observed a previously undetected 69- kD protein in 12S U1 snRNPs isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts under non-denaturing conditions that is clearly distinct from the U1-70K protein. The following evidence indicates that the 69-kD protein is a common, rather than a U1-specific, protein, possibly associating with the snRNP core particles by protein-protein interaction. (a) Antibodies raised against the 69-kD protein, which did not cross-react with any of the Sm proteins B'-G, precipitated not only U1 snRNPs, but also the other spliceosomal snRNPs U2, U4/U6 and U5, albeit to a lower extent. (b) U1, U2, and U5 core RNP particles reconstituted in vitro contain the 69-kD protein. (c) Xenopus laevis oocytes contain an immunologically related homologue of the human 69-kD protein. When U1 snRNA as well as a mutant U1 snRNA, that can bind the Sm core proteins but lacks the capacity to bind the U1-specific proteins 70K, A, and C, were injected into Xenopus oocytes to allow assembly in vivo, they were recognized by antibodies specific against the 69-kD protein in the ooplasm and in the nucleus. The 69-kD protein is under-represented, if present at all, in purified 17S U2 and in 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNPs, isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts. Our results are consistent with the working hypothesis that this protein may either play a role in the cytoplasmic assembly of the core domain of the snRNPs and/or in the nuclear transport of the snRNPs. After transport of the snRNPs into the nucleus, it may dissociate from the particles as for example in the case of the 17S U2 or the 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP, which bind more than 10 different snRNP specific proteins each in the nucleus.     

Nuclear transport of U1 snRNP in somatic cells: differences in signal requirement compared with Xenopus laevis oocytes

The signal requirement for the nuclear import of U1 RNA in somatic cells from different species was investigated by microinjection of both digoxygenin-labeled wild type and mutant U1 RNA molecules and in vitro reconstituted U1 snRNPs. U1 RNA was shown to be targeted to the nucleus by a temperature-dependent process that requires the prior assembly of RNPs from the common proteins and the microinjected RNA. Competition in the cell between immunoaffinity-purified U1 snRNPs and digoxygenin- labeled U1 snRNPs reconstituted in vitro showed that the transport is saturable and should therefore be a mediated process. The transport of a karyophilic protein under the same conditions was not affected, indicating the existence of a U snRNP-specific transport pathway in somatic cells, as already seen in the Xenopus laevis oocyte system. Surprisingly, the signal requirement for nuclear transport of U1 snRNP was found to differ between oocytes and somatic cells from mouse, monkey and Xenopus, in that the m3GGpppG-cap is no longer an essential signaling component in somatic cells. However, as shown by investigation of the transport kinetics of m3GpppG- and ApppG-capped U1 snRNPs, the m3GpppG-cap accelerates the rate of U1 snRNP import significantly indicating that it has retained a signaling role for nuclear targeting of U1 snRNP in somatic cells. Moreover, our data strongly suggest that cell specific rather than species specific differences account for the differential m3G-cap requirement in nuclear import of U1 snRNPs.     

Structurally related but functionally distinct yeast Sm D core small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle proteins.

Spliceosome assembly during pre-mRNA splicing requires the correct positioning of the U1, U2, U4/U6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) on the precursor mRNA. The structure and integrity of these snRNPs are maintained in part by the association of the snRNAs with core snRNP (Sm) proteins. The Sm proteins also play a pivotal role in metazoan snRNP biogenesis. We have characterized a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene, SMD3, that encodes the core snRNP protein Smd3. The Smd3 protein is required for pre-mRNA splicing in vivo. Depletion of this protein from yeast cells affects the levels of U snRNAs and their cap modification, indicating that Smd3 is required for snRNP biogenesis. Smd3 is structurally and functionally distinct from the previously described yeast core polypeptide Smd1. Although Smd3 and Smd1 are both associated with the spliceosomal snRNPs, overexpression of one cannot compensate for the loss of the other. Thus, these two proteins have distinct functions. A pool of Smd3 exists in the yeast cytoplasm. This is consistent with the possibility that snRNP assembly in S. cerevisiae, as in metazoans, is initiated in the cytoplasm from a pool of RNA-free core snRNP protein complexes.     

Newly assembled snRNPs associate with coiled bodies before speckles, suggesting a nuclear snRNP maturation pathway.

BACKGROUND: Small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs), which are essential components of the mRNA splicing machinery, comprise small nuclear RNAs, each complexed with a set of proteins. An early event in the maturation of snRNPs is the binding of the core proteins - the Sm proteins - to snRNAs in the cytoplasm followed by nuclear import. Immunolabelling with antibodies against Sm proteins shows that splicing snRNPs have a complex steady-state localisation within the nucleus, the result of the association of snRNPs with several distinct subnuclear structures. These include speckles, coiled bodies and nucleoli, in addition to a diffuse nucleoplasmic compartment. The reasons for snRNP accumulation in these different structures are unclear. RESULTS: When mammalian cells were microinjected with plasmids encoding the Sm proteins B, D1 and E, each tagged with either the green fluorescent protein (GFP) or yellow-shifted GFP (YFP), a pulse of expression of the tagged proteins was observed. In each case, the newly synthesised GFP/YFP-labelled snRNPs accumulated first in coiled bodies and nucleoli, and later in nuclear speckles. Mature snRNPs localised immediately to speckles upon entering the nucleus after cell division. CONCLUSIONS: The complex nuclear localisation of splicing snRNPs results, at least in part, from a specific pathway for newly assembled snRNPs. The data demonstrate that the distribution of snRNPs between coiled bodies and speckles is directed and not random.     

Role of Cajal Bodies and Nucleolus in the Maturation of the U1 snRNP in Arabidopsis

Background

The biogenesis of spliceosomal snRNPs takes place in both the cytoplasm where Sm core proteins are added and snRNAs are modified at the 5′ and 3′ termini and in the nucleus where snRNP-specific proteins associate. U1 snRNP consists of U1 snRNA, seven Sm proteins and three snRNP-specific proteins, U1-70K, U1A, and U1C. It has been shown previously that after import to the nucleus U2 and U4/U6 snRNP-specific proteins first appear in Cajal bodies (CB) and then in splicing speckles. In addition, in cells grown under normal conditions U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNAs/snRNPs are abundant in CBs. Therefore, it has been proposed that the final assembly of these spliceosomal snRNPs takes place in this nuclear compartment. In contrast, U1 snRNA in both animal and plant cells has rarely been found in this nuclear compartment.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here, we analysed the subnuclear distribution of Arabidopsis U1 snRNP-specific proteins fused to GFP or mRFP in transiently transformed Arabidopsis protoplasts. Irrespective of the tag used, U1-70K was exclusively found in the nucleus, whereas U1A and U1C were equally distributed between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. In the nucleus all three proteins localised to CBs and nucleoli although to different extent. Interestingly, we also found that the appearance of the three proteins in nuclear speckles differ significantly. U1-70K was mostly found in speckles whereas U1A and U1C in ∼90% of cells showed diffuse nucleoplasmic in combination with CBs and nucleolar localisation.

Conclusions/Significance

Our data indicate that CBs and nucleolus are involved in the maturation of U1 snRNP. Differences in nuclear accumulation and distribution between U1-70K and U1A and U1C proteins may indicate that either U1-70K or U1A and U1C associate with, or is/are involved, in other nuclear processes apart from pre-mRNA splicing.