The diastolic flow velocity-pressure gradient relation and dpv50 to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses

To evaluate the hemodynamic impact of coronary stenoses, the fractional (FFR) or coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) usually is measured. The combined measurement of instantaneous flow velocity and pressure gradient (v-dp relation) is rarely used in humans. We derived from the v-dp relation a new index, dp(v50) (pressure gradient at flow velocity of 50 cm/s), and compared the diagnostic performance of dp(v50), CFVR, and FFR. Before coronary angiography was performed, patients underwent noninvasive stress testing. In all coronary vessels with an intermediate or severe stenosis, the flow velocity, aortic, and distal coronary pressure were measured simultaneously with a Doppler and pressure guidewire after induction of hyperemia. After regression analysis of all middiastolic flow velocity and pressure gradient data, the dp(v50) was calculated. With the use of the results of noninvasive stress testing, the dp(v50) cutoff value was established at 22.4 mmHg. In 77 patients, 124 coronary vessels with a mean 39% (SD 19) diameter stenosis were analyzed. In 43 stenoses, ischemia was detected. We found a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 56%, 86%, and 76% for CFVR; 77%, 99%, and 91% for FFR; and 95%, 95%, and 95% for dp(v50). To establish that dp(v50) is not dependent on maximal hyperemia, dp(v50) was recalculated after omission of the highest quartile of flow velocity data, showing a difference of 3%. We found that dp(v50) provided the highest sensitivity and accuracy compared with FFR and CFVR in the assessment of coronary stenoses. In contrast to CFVR and FFR, assessment of dp(v50) is not dependent on maximal hyperemia.     

Long-term prognostic value of CFVR and FFR versus perfusion scintigraphy in patients with multivessel disease

ObjectiveIn this multicentre study, we investigated the long-term prognostic value of intracoronary derived haemodynamic parameters compared with the results of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). MethodsPatients (n=191) who were referred for angioplasty of a severe lesion in the presence of an intermediate lesion in another coronary artery were included. MPS was performed to determine the presence of reversible perfusion defects in the area of the intermediate lesion. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and additionally fractional flow reserve (FFR; n=129), were determined distal to the intermediate lesion; CFVR ≥2.0 and FFR ≥0.75 were considered negative. ResultsIn total 67 events occurred in 49 patients (3 deaths, 9 MI, 9 CABG, 46 PTCA) during a mean of 793 days follow-up. Event-free survival was 63% for MPS, 79% for CFVR, and 79% for FFR if a negative test result was obtained. The relative risk was 1.2 (not significant) for MPS, 2.2 (p=0.001) for CFVR, and 2.4 (p=0.004) for FFR. ConclusionSelective evaluation of an intermediate lesion using CFVR or FFR allows more adequate risk stratification in patients with multivessel disease than MPS. A CFVR <2.0 or a FFR <0.75 was associated with a significant increase of the occurrence of cardiac events during long-term follow-up, predominantly associated with revascularisation. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:369-74.)     

Characterizing momentum change and viscous loss of a hemodynamic endpoint in assessment of coronary lesions

Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR(myo)) and coronary flow reserve (CFR), measured with guidewire, and quantitative angiography (QA) are widely used in combination to distinguish ischemic from non-ischemic coronary stenoses. Recent studies have shown that simultaneous measurements of FFR(myo) and CFR are recommended to dissociate conduit epicardial coronary stenoses from distal resistance microvascular disease. In this study, a more comprehensive diagnostic parameter, named as lesion flow coefficient, c, is proposed. The coefficient, c, which accounts for mean pressure drop, Delta p, mean coronary flow, Q, and percentage area stenosis, can be used to assess the hemodynamic severity of a coronary artery stenoses. Importantly, the contribution of viscous loss and loss due to momentum change for several lesion sizes can be distinguished using c. FFR(myo), CFR and c were calculated for pre-angioplasty, intermediate and post-angioplasty epicardial lesions, without microvascular disease. While hyperemic c decreased from 0.65 for pre-angioplasty to 0.48 for post-angioplasty lesion with guidewire of size 0.35 mm, FFR(myo) increased from 0.52 to 0.87, and CFR increased from 1.72 to 3.45, respectively. Thus, reduced loss produced by momentum change due to lower percentage area stenosis decreased c. For post-angioplasty lesion, c decreased from 0.55 to 0.48 with the insertion of guidewire. Hence, increased viscous loss due to the presence of guidewire decreased c compared with a lesion without guidewire. Further, c showed a linear relationship with FFR(myo), CFR and percentage area stenosis for pre-angioplasty, intermediate and post-angioplasty lesion. These baseline values of c were developed from fluid dynamics fundamentals for focal lesions, and provided a single hemodynamic endpoint to evaluate coronary stenosis severity.     

Evaluation of functional severity of coronary artery disease and fluid dynamics' influence on hemodynamic parameters: A review

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is responsible for most of the deaths in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Diagnostic coronary angiography analysis offers an anatomical knowledge of the severity of the stenosis. The functional or physiological significance is more valuable than the anatomical significance of CAD. Clinicians assess the functional severity of the stenosis by resorting to an invasive measurement of the pressure drop and flow. Hemodynamic parameters, such as pressure wire assessment fractional flow reserve (FFR) or Doppler wire assessment coronary flow reserve (CFR) are well-proven techniques to evaluate the physiological significance of the coronary artery stenosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Between the two techniques mentioned above, the FFR is seen as a very useful index. The presence of guide wire reduces the coronary flow which causes the underestimation of pressure drop across the stenosis which leads to dilemma for the clinicians in the assessment of moderate stenosis. In such condition, the fundamental fluid mechanics is useful in the development of new functional severity parameters such as pressure drop coefficient and lesion flow coefficient. Since the flow takes place in a narrowed artery, the blood behaves as a non-Newtonian fluid. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) allows a complete coronary flow simulation to study the relationship between the pressure and flow. This paper aims at explaining (i) diagnostic modalities for the evaluation of the CAD and valuable insights regarding FFR in the evaluation of the functional severity of the CAD (ii) the role of fluid dynamics in measuring the severity of CAD.     

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Enhances Accelerative Wave Intensity in Coronary Arteries

Background

The systolic forward travelling compression wave (sFCW) and diastolic backward travelling decompression waves (dBEW) predominantly accelerate coronary blood flow. The effect of a coronary stenosis on the intensity of these waves in the distal vessel is unknown. We investigated the relationship between established physiological indices of hyperemic coronary flow and the intensity of the two major accelerative coronary waves identified by Coronary Wave Intensity analysis (CWIA).

Methodology / Principal Findings

Simultaneous intracoronary pressure and velocity measurement was performed during adenosine induced hyperemia in 17 patients with pressure / Doppler flow wires positioned distal to the target lesion. CWI profiles were generated from this data. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve (CFVR) were calculated concurrently. The intensity of the dBEW was significantly correlated with FFR (R = -0.70, P = 0.003) and CFVR (R = -0.73, P = 0.001). The intensity of the sFCW was also significantly correlated with baseline FFR (R = 0.71, p = 0.002) and CFVR (R = 0.59, P = 0.01). Stenting of the target lesion resulted in a median 178% (interquartile range 55–280%) (P<0.0001) increase in sFCW intensity and a median 117% (interquartile range 27–509%) (P = 0.001) increase in dBEW intensity. The increase in accelerative wave intensity following PCI was proportionate to the baseline FFR and CFVR, such that stenting of lesions associated with the greatest flow limitation (lowest FFR and CFVR) resulted in the largest increases in wave intensity.

Conclusions

Increasing ischemia severity is associated with proportionate reductions in cumulative intensity of both major accelerative coronary waves. Impaired diastolic microvascular decompression may represent a novel, important pathophysiologic mechanism driving the reduction in coronary blood flow in the setting of an epicardial stenosis.     

Influence of heart rate on fractional flow reserve, pressure drop coefficient, and lesion flow coefficient for epicardial coronary stenosis in a porcine model

A limitation in the use of invasive coronary diagnostic indexes is that fluctuations in hemodynamic factors such as heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and contractility may alter resting or hyperemic flow measurements and may introduce uncertainties in the interpretation of these indexes. In this study, we focused on the effect of fluctuations in HR and area stenosis (AS) on diagnostic indexes. We hypothesized that the pressure drop coefficient (CDP(e), ratio of transstenotic pressure drop and distal dynamic pressure), lesion flow coefficient (LFC, square root of ratio of limiting value CDP and CDP at site of stenosis) derived from fluid dynamics principles, and fractional flow reserve (FFR, ratio of average distal and proximal pressures) are independent of HR and can significantly differentiate between the severity of stenosis. Cardiac catheterization was performed on 11 Yorkshire pigs. Simultaneous measurements of distal coronary arterial pressure and flow were performed using a dual sensor-tipped guidewire for HR < 120 and HR > 120 beats/min, in the presence of epicardial coronary lesions of <50% AS and >50% AS. The mean values of FFR, CDP(e), and LFC were significantly different (P < 0.05) for lesions of <50% AS and >50% AS (0.88 ± 0.04, 0.76 ± 0.04; 62 ± 30, 151 ± 35, and 0.10 ± 0.02 and 0.16 ± 0.01, respectively). The mean values of FFR and CDP(e) were not significantly different (P > 0.05) for variable HR conditions of HR < 120 and HR > 120 beats/min (FFR, 0.81 ± 0.04 and 0.82 ± 0.04; and CDP(e), 95 ± 33 and 118 ± 36). The mean values of LFC do somewhat vary with HR (0.14 ± 0.01 and 0.12 ± 0.02). In conclusion, fluctuations in HR have no significant influence on the measured values of CDP(e) and FFR but have a marginal influence on the measured values of LFC. However, all three parameters can significantly differentiate between stenosis severities. These results suggest that the diagnostic parameters can be potentially used in a better assessment of coronary stenosis severity under a clinical setting.     

Influence of hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve: parametric analysis of underlying model

Pressure-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) is used clinically to evaluate the functional severity of a coronary stenosis, by predicting relative maximal coronary flow (Q(s)/Q(n)). It is considered to be independent of hemodynamic conditions, which seems unlikely because stenosis resistance is flow dependent. Using a resistive model of an epicardial stenosis (0-80% diameter reduction) in series with the coronary microcirculation at maximal vasodilation, we evaluated FFR for changes in coronary microvascular resistance (R(cor) = 0.2-0.6 mmHg. ml(-1). min), aortic pressure (P(a) = 70-130 mmHg), and coronary outflow pressure (P(b) = 0-15 mmHg). For a given stenosis, FFR increased with decreasing P(a) or increasing R(cor). The sensitivity of FFR to these hemodynamic changes was highest for stenoses of intermediate severity. For P(b) > 0, FFR progressively exceeded Q(s)/Q(n) with increasing stenosis severity unless P(b) was included in the calculation of FFR. Although the P(b)-corrected FFR equaled Q(s)/Q(n) for a given stenosis, both parameters remained equally dependent on hemodynamic conditions, through their direct relationship to both stenosis and coronary resistance.     

Minimal effect of collateral flow on coronary microvascular resistance in the presence of intermediate and noncritical coronary stenoses

Depending on stenosis severity, collateral flow can be a confounding factor in the determination of coronary hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR). Under certain assumptions, the calculation of HMR can be corrected for collateral flow by incorporating the wedge pressure (P(w)) in the calculation. However, although P(w) > 25 mmHg is indicative of collateral flow, P(w) does in part also reflect myocardial wall stress neglected in the assumptions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish whether adjusting HMR by P(w) is pertinent for a diagnostically relevant range of stenosis severities as expressed by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Accordingly, intracoronary pressure and Doppler flow velocity were measured a total of 95 times in 29 patients distal to a coronary stenosis before and after stepwise percutaneous coronary intervention. HMR was calculated without (HMR) and with P(w)-based adjustment for collateral flow (HMR(C)). FFR ranged from 0.3 to 1. HMR varied between 1 and 5 and HMR(C) between 0.5 and 4.2 mmHg·cm(-1)·s. HMR was about 37% higher than HMR(C) for stenoses with FFR < 0.6, but for FFR > 0.8, the relative difference was reduced to 4.4 ± 3.4%. In the diagnostically relevant range of FFR between 0.6 and 0.8, this difference was 16.5 ± 10.4%. In conclusion, P(w)-based adjustment likely overestimates the effect of potential collateral flow and is not needed for the assessment of coronary HMR in the presence of a flow-limiting stenosis characterized by FFR between 0.6 and 0.8 or for nonsignificant lesions.     

Effects of diagnostic guidewire catheter presence on translesional hemodynamic measurements across significant coronary artery stenoses

This study gains insight on the nature of flow blockage effects of small guidewire catheter sensors in measuring mean trans-stenotic pressure gradients Deltap across significant coronary artery stenoses. Detailed pulsatile hemodynamic computations were made in conjunction with previously reported clinical data in a group of patients with clinically significant coronary lesions before angioplasty. Results of this study ascertain changes in hemodynamic conditions due to the insertion of a guidewire catheter (di=0.46 mm) across the lesions used to directly determine the mean pressure gradient (Deltap) and fall in distal mean coronary pressure (pr). For the 32 patient group of Wilson et al. [1988] (minimal lesion diameter dm=0.95 mm; 90% mean area stenosis; proximal measured coronary flow reserve (CFR) of 2.3 in the abnormal range) the diameter ratio of guidewire catheter to minimal lesion was 0.48, causing a tighter "artifactual" mean area stenosis of 92.1%. The results of the computations indicated a significant shift in the Deltap-Q relation due to guidewire induced increases in flow resistances (R=Deltap/Q) of 110% for hyperemic flow, a 35% blockage in hyperemic flow (Qh) and a phase shift of the coronary flow waveform to systolic predominance. These alterations in flow resulted in a fall in distal mean coronary pressure (at lower mean flow rates) below the patho-physiological range of prh approximately 55 mmHg, which is known to cause ischemia in the subendocardium (Brown et al. [1984]) and coincides with symptomatic angina. Transient wall shear stress levels in the narrow throat region (with flow blockage) were of the order of levels during hyperemic conditions for patho-physiological flow. In the separated flow region along the distal vessel wall, vortical flow cells formed periodically during the systolic phase when instantaneous Reynolds numbers Ree(t) exceeded about 110. For patho-physiological flow without the presence of the guidewire these vortical flow cells were much stronger than in the more viscous flow regime with the guidewire present. The non-dimensional pressure data given in tabular form may be useful in interpretation of guidewire measurements done clinically for lesions of similar geometry and severity.     

Intermediate coronary artery stenosis: evidence-based decisions in interventions to avoid the oculostenotic reflex

The prevalence of intermediate coronary artery stenosis (defined as a diameter stenosis of 40% to 70%) is quite large in patients undergoing PTCA. The coronary angiogram is considered the 'gold standard' for the definition of coronary anatomy, in spite of various limitations associated with its use. In recent years, sensor tipped guidewire based methods of physiologic assessment of stenosis severity, like myocardial fractional flow reserve, and poststenotic coronary flow reserve had established their role in the decision making in catheterization laboratory. The decision making should combine morphologic and physiologic assessment as better evidence based approach in guiding therapy to avoid the 'oculostenotic reflex'.     

Influence of coronary collateral flow on coronary diagnostic parameters: An in vitro study

Functional severity of coronary stenosis is often assessed using diagnostic parameters. These parameters are evaluated from the combined pressure and/or flow measurements taken at the site of the stenosis. However, when there are functional collaterals operating downstream to the stenosis, the coronary flow-rate increases, and the pressure in the stenosed artery is altered. This effect of downstream collaterals on different diagnostic parameters is studied using a physiological representative in vitro coronary flow-loop.The three diagnostic parameters tested are fractional flow reserve (FFR), lesion flow coefficient (LFC), and pressure drop coefficient (CDP). The latter two were discussed in recent publications by our group (Banerjee et al., 2008, Banerjee et al., 2007, 2009). They are evaluated for three different severities of stenosis and tested for possible misinterpretation in the presence of variable collateral flows. Pressure and flow are measured with and without downstream collaterals. The diagnostic parameters are then calculated from these readings.In the case of intermediate stenosis (80% area blockage), FFR and LFC increased from 0.74 to 0.77 and 0.58 to 0.62, respectively, for no collateral to fully developed collateral flow. Also, CDP decreased from 47 to 42 for no collateral to fully developed collateral flow. These changes in diagnostic parameters might lead to erroneous postponement of coronary intervention. Thus, variability in diagnostic parameters for the same stenosis might lead to misinterpretation of stenosis severity in the presence of operating downstream collaterals.     

Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease

Homogeneity of microvascular resistance in different perfusion areas of the same heart is generally assumed. We investigated the effect of the severity of an epicardial stenosis on microvascular resistance in 27 patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina. All patients had an angiographically normal coronary artery, an artery with an intermediate lesion, and an artery with a severe lesion; the latter was treated with angioplasty. In each patient, distal blood flow velocity and pressure were measured during baseline and maximal hyperemia (induced by intracoronary adenosine) using a Doppler and pressure guide wire, respectively. The ratio of mean distal pressure to average peak blood flow velocity was used as an index for the microvascular resistance (MRv). Within patients, the hyperemic MRv was higher in arteries with more severe stenosis (P = 0.021). After percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), the hyperemic MRv decreased (pre-PTCA, 2.6 vs. post-PTCA, 1.9 mmHg.cm(-1)s(-1), P < 0.01) toward the value of the reference artery (1.7 mmHg.cm(-1)s(-1); P = 0.67). We conclude that there is a positive association between coronary lesion severity and variability of distal microvascular resistance that normalizes after angioplasty. This study challenges the concept of uniform distribution of hyperemic MRv that is relevant for the interpretation of both noninvasive and invasive diagnostic tests.     

Influence of newly designed monorail pressure sensor catheter on coronary diagnostic parameters: An in vitro study

The decision to perform intervention on a patient with coronary stenosis is often based on functional diagnostic parameters obtained from pressure and flow measurements using sensor-tipped guidewire at maximal vasodilation (hyperemia). Recently, a rapid exchange Monorail Pressure Sensor catheter of 0.022″ diameter (MPS22), with pressure sensor at distal end has been developed for improved assessment of stenosis severity. The hollow shaft of the MPS22 is designed to slide over any standard 0.014″ guidewire (G14). Hence, influence of MPS22 diameter on coronary diagnostic parameters needs investigation. An in vitro experiment was conducted to replicate physiologic flows in three representative area stenosis (AS): mild (64% AS), intermediate (80% AS), and severe (90% AS), for two arterial diameters, 3 mm (N2; more common) and 2.5 mm (N1). Influence of MPS22 on diagnostic parameters: fractional flow reserve (FFR) and pressure drop coefficient (CDP) was evaluated both at hyperemic and basal conditions, while comparing it with G14. The FFR values decreased for the MPS22 in comparison to G14, (Mild: 0.87 vs 0.88, Intermediate: 0.68 vs 0.73, Severe: 0.48 vs 0.56) and CDP values increased (Mild: 16 vs 14, Intermediate: 75 vs 56, Severe: 370 vs 182) for N2. Similar trend was observed in the case of N1. The FFR values were found to be well above (mild) and below (intermediate and severe) the diagnostic cut-off of 0.75. Therefore, MPS22 catheter can be used as a possible alternative to G14. Further, irrespective of the MPS22 or G14, basal FFR (FFR_b) had overlapping ranges in close proximity for clinically relevant mild and intermediate stenoses that will lead to diagnostic uncertainty under both N1 and N2. However, CDP_b had distinct ranges for different stenosis severities and could be a potential diagnostic parameter under basal conditions.     

Residual angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an important diagnostic tool to guide decision-making in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory and for evaluation of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Especially the pressure pullback curve at maximal hyperaemia is convincing in demonstrating the exact location and severity of a coronary stenosis. This pressure pullback curve can also demonstrate the presence of diffuse disease. We present a case in which FFR with pressure pullback curve seven days after a PCI, which did not result in complete symptom relief, indicates the presence of diffuse disease. Based on this result the patient was treated medically.     

Coronary pressure and FFR predict long-term outcome after PTCA

Although coronary stents have been the most important improvement in percutaneous coronary interventions in the last 10 years, it is well known to interventionalists that many patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) have a favourable outcome without stenting. Coronary angiography, however, is not sensitive enough to identify those particular patients and it has been suggested that a combination of angiographic and functional criteria would be more suitable to distinguish patients with a low restenosis chance after plain balloon angioplasty. In the present study, the authors investigated the value of coronary pressure measurement for conditional stenting in 85 patients. It was demonstrated that in patients in whom a high fractional flow reserve (FFR) was present (> 0.90), the incidence of coronary events at two-year follow-up was almost three times lower than in those patients with an FFR below 0.90. Such high FFRs could be obtained in approximately 45% of all patients. In an additional group of patients, it was demonstrated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies that the mechanism of a high FFR after plain balloon angioplasty is most likely the result of a larger lumen compared with patients with a suboptimal FFR. This means that, in patients in whom both the angiographic and the functional result after PTCA is optimal, a restenosis rate is achieved similar to that achieved by stenting. Obviously, in such patients, additional stenting and a number of problems in the long-term possibly related to stenting can be avoided. Therefore, coronary angiography and coronary pressure measurement have a complementary value in the evaluation of PTCA results and such information can be easily obtained by using a pressure wire instead of a regular guidewire.     

The severity of coronary artery disease and reversible ischemia revealed by N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with unstable angina and preserved left ventricular function

The association between the levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosed by coronary angiography and other approaches has been investigated. The clinical application of NT-proBNP is restricted by the drawbacks of these techniques now available in screening out patients who need intensive or conservative treatment. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is superior to coronary angiography and other functional indicators. Accordingly, we designed to investigate the association between NT-proBNP and myocardial ischemia from the perspective of anatomy and physiology in patients with unstable angina and preserved left ventricular function. Plasma samples were collected from 110 patients and NT-proBNP levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. The severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients was measured by coronary angiography and FFR. Stenosis ≥50% in the left main artery or stenosis of 70%, and fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80 in one or more coronary branches with diameter ≥2 mm were defined as “positive”, which require revascularization. NT-proBNP levels increased progressively between patients with negative and positive angiographic results (p < 0.05), and between FFR-negative and FFR-positive patients (p < 0.05). A significant correlation was observed between log NT-proBNP and log GS (GS = Gensini score, p < 0.001). NT-proBNP level serves as a predictor of positive results of angiographic stenosis and FFR, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve being 0.697 and 0.787, respectively. NT-proBNP levels are correlated with the severity of anatomic coronary obstruction and inducible myocardial ischemia, but NT-proBNP per se is insufficient to identify clinically significant angiographic and physiological stenoses.     

Attenuation of heart failure due to coronary stenosis by ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker

It is not known how the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) attenuate heart failure (HF) in viable ischemic hearts. To assess HF in a rat coronary stenosis (CS) model, we administered vehicle and quinapril or candesartan (or both) orally for 12 wk. Compared with the sham group, the vehicle group showed impaired myocardial perfusion, impaired coronary endothelial nitric oxide (NO) function in vitro, exhausted myocardial mitochondrial respiration, larger left ventricular (LV) dimensions and lower ejection fraction, lower LV rate of pressure development over time (dP/dt), lower slopes of LV end-systolic pressure-dimension relations (ESPDRs), and increased myocardial fibrosis. Treatment with quinapril or candesartan ameliorated these parameters without modifying the epicardial CS severity. Moreover, their combination maintained similar myocardial perfusion, despite a trend toward lower blood pressure, and showed distinctive neurohumoral modulation, normalized mitochondrial respiration, and increased ESPDR slopes. Thus improved myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve by quinapril or candesartan are the key to alleviate CS-induced HF, and their combination may have a therapeutic significance partly through ameliorated mitochondrial respiration and improved LV systolic function.     

Diagnostic Performance of First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging without Stress with Computed Tomography (CT) Compared with Coronary CT Angiography Alone,with Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in combination with first-pass CT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has a better diagnostic performance than CCTA alone, compared with invasive coronary angiography as the reference standard. The aim of this study was to investigate the additional diagnostic value of first-pass CT-MPI without stress for detecting hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis, compared with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). We recruited 53 patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing both CCTA and first-pass CT-MPI without stress and invasive FFR, and 75 vessels were analyzed. We used the same raw data for CCTA and CT-MPI. First-pass CT-MPI was reconstructed by examining the diastolic signal densities as a bull’s eye map. Invasive FFR <0.8 was considered as positive. On per-vessel analysis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for CCTA plus first-pass CT-MPI and CCTA alone was 0.81 (0.73–0.90) and 0.70 (0.61–0.81), respectively (P = 0.036). CCTA plus first-pass CT-MPI without stress showed 0.73 sensitivity, 0.74 specificity, 0.53 positive predictive value, and 0.87 negative predictive value for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. First-pass CT-MPI without stress correctly reclassified 38% of CCTA false-positive vessels as true negative. First-pass CT-MPI without stress combined with CCTA demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy, compared with invasive FFR as the reference standard. This technique could complement CCTA for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.     

Recanalization of chronic total coronary occlusions: the impact of a new specific guidewire on primary success rate

BACKGROUND: Although chronic total occlusions are encountered frequently in patients with coronary artery disease, an effective strategy to deal with them has yet to be devised. Various new guidewires have been designed in an attempt to negotiate chronic occlusions successfully. The authors have analysed the impact of the Athlete guidewire on procedural success in this lesion subset. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusions over a two-year period were retrospectively studied. For the initial attempt, conventional guidewires were used. In case of failure, further attempts were made using the Athlete guidewire. Procedural success rates with the use of conventional and Athlete guidewires were assessed. RESULTS: Failure of the first attempt with the conventional guidewire occurred in 32 (51.6%) patients and success was achieved in 30 (48.4%) patients. In the former patients, a second attempt was made using the Athlete guidewire to cross the occlusion. The second attempt was successful in 20 patients (60%) in whom the first attempt was unsuccessful, while in the remaining 12 (40%) patients the occlusion could not be crossed even during the second attempt and the procedure was then terminated. Following the use of the Athlete guidewire, the success rate increased to 62% (p < 0.001). No complication occurred during the first attempt, while one patient had a coronary perforation using the Athlete guidewire, which was managed successfully without the need for bypass surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of the Athlete guidewire is feasible and safe, and enhances the chances of successfully treating chronic total occlusions during percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures.     

Delineating the guide-wire flow obstruction effect in assessment of fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve measurements

Hemodynamic analysis was conducted to determine uncertainty in clinical measurements of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) over pathophysiological conditions in a patient group with coronary artery disease during angioplasty. The vasodilation-distal perfusion pressure (CFR-p(rh)) curve was obtained for 0.35- and 0.46-mm guide wires. Our hypothesis is that a guide wire spanning the lesions elevates the pressure gradient and reduces the flow during hyperemic measurements. Maximal CFR-p(rh) was uniquely determined by the intersection of measured CFR and calculated p(rh) of native and residual epicardial lesions in patients without microvascular disease, during angioplasty. Extrapolation of the linear curve gave a zero-coronary flow mean pressure (p(zf)) of approximately 20 mmHg and a corresponding p(rh) of 55 mmHg in the native lesions, which coincided with the level that causes ischemia in human hearts. On this linear curve, values of CFR and FFRmyo (pathophysiological condition) and CFRg and FFRmyog (in the presence of the guide wire) were obtained in native and residual lesions. A strong linear correlation was found between CFR and CFRg [CFR = CFRg x 0.689 + 1.271 (R2= 0.99) for 0.46 mm and CFR = CFRg x 0.757 + 1.004 (R2= 0.99) for 0.35 mm] and between FFRmyo and FFRmyog [FFRmyo = FFRmyog x 0.737 + 0.263 (R2= 0.99) for 0.46 mm and FFRmyo = FFRmyog x 0.790 + 0.210 (R2= 0.99) for 0.35 mm]. This study establishes a strong correlation between CFR and CFRg and between FFRmyo and FFRmyog, which could be used to obtain the true state of occlusion in the coronary artery during angioplasty.