Illumination of upper and middle visual fields produces equivalent suppression of melatonin in older volunteers

Bright light treatment has become an important method of treating depression and circadian rhythm sleep disorders. The efficacy of bright light treatment may be dependent upon the position of the light-source, as it determines the relative illumination in each portion of the visual field. This study compared illumination of upper and middle visual fields to determine whether melatonin suppression is different or equivalent. Thirteen older volunteers received three illumination conditions in counterbalanced orders: 1000 lux in the upper visual field, 1000 lux in the middle visual field, or dim diffuse illumination < 5 lux. A four-choice reaction time task was performed during tests to ensure eye direction and illumination of the intended portion of the visual field. Illumination in the upper and middle visual fields significantly suppressed melatonin compared to < 5 lux (p < 0.001). Melatonin suppression was not significantly different with upper or middle field illumination. These results indicate that bright light treatments placed above the eye level might be as effective as those requiring patients to look directly at the light source. Clinical comparative testing would be valuable. In addition, this study demonstrates that significant suppression of melatonin may be achieved through the use of bright light in healthy older volunteers.     

ILLUMINATION OF UPPER AND MIDDLE VISUAL FIELDS PRODUCES EQUIVALENT SUPPRESSION OF MELATONIN IN OLDER VOLUNTEERS

Bright light treatment has become an important method of treating depression and circadian rhythm sleep disorders. The efficacy of bright light treatment may be dependent upon the position of the light-source, as it determines the relative illumination in each portion of the visual field. This study compared illumination of upper and middle visual fields to determine whether melatonin suppression is different or equivalent. Thirteen older volunteers received three illumination conditions in counterbalanced orders: 1000 lux in the upper visual field, 1000 lux in the middle visual field, or dim diffuse illumination <5 lux. A four-choice reaction time task was performed during tests to ensure eye direction and illumination of the intended portion of the visual field. Illumination in the upper and middle visual fields significantly suppressed melatonin compared to <5 lux (p<0.001). Melatonin suppression was not significantly different with upper or middle field illumination. These results indicate that bright light treatments placed above the eye level might be as effective as those requiring patients to look directly at the light source. Clinical comparative testing would be valuable. In addition, this study demonstrates that significant suppression of melatonin may be achieved through the use of bright light in healthy older volunteers.     

The Effect on Body Temperature and Melatonin of A 39-H Constant Routine with Two Different Light Levels at Nighttime

Eight healthy subjects were studied during 39-h spans (from 07:00 on one day until 22:00 the second) in which they remained awake. During one experiment, subjects were exposed to 100 lux of light between 18:00 and 8:00, and during a second experiment, they were exposed to 1000 lux during the same time span. Throughout the daytime period, they were exposed to normal daylight (1500 lux or more). The nighttime 1000-lux light treatment suppressed the melatonin metabolite aMT6s, while the 100 lux treatment did not. On the treatment day, the 1000 lux, in comparison to the 100 lux, light treatment resulted in both an elevated temperature minimum and a delay in its clock-time occurrence overnight. No real circadian phase shift in the temperature, urinary melatonin, or Cortisol rhythms was detected after light treatment. This study confirmed that nocturnal exposure to lower light intensities is capable of modifying circadian variables more than previously estimated. The immediate effects of all-night light treatment are essentially not different from those of evening light. This may be important if bright light is used to improve alertness of night workers. Whether subsequent daytime alertness and sleep recovery are affected by the protocol used in our study remains to be determined.     

Efficacy of a single sequence of intermittent bright light pulses for delaying circadian phase in humans

It has been shown in animal studies that exposure to brief pulses of bright light can phase shift the circadian pacemaker and that the resetting action of light is most efficient during the first minutes of light exposure. In humans, multiple consecutive days of exposure to brief bright light pulses have been shown to phase shift the circadian pacemaker. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a single sequence of brief bright light pulses administered during the early biological night would phase delay the human circadian pacemaker. Twenty-one healthy young subjects underwent a 6.5-h light exposure session in one of three randomly assigned conditions: 1) continuous bright light of approximately 9,500 lux, 2) intermittent bright light (six 15-min bright light pulses of approximately 9,500 lux separated by 60 min of very dim light of <1 lux), and 3) continuous very dim light of <1 lux. Twenty subjects were included in the analysis. Core body temperature (CBT) and melatonin were used as phase markers of the circadian pacemaker. Phase delays of CBT and melatonin rhythms in response to intermittent bright light pulses were comparable to those measured after continuous bright light exposure, even though the total exposure to the intermittent bright light represented only 23% of the 6.5-h continuous exposure. These results demonstrate that a single sequence of intermittent bright light pulses can phase delay the human circadian pacemaker and show that intermittent pulses have a greater resetting efficacy on a per minute basis than does continuous exposure.     

Suppression of nocturnal plasma melatonin and 6-sulphatoxymelatonin by bright and dim light in man

Previous studies have shown that bright light (2500 lux) suppresses nocturnal secretion of melatonin, while dim light (500 lux) has little or no effect. We have studied the effect of varying intensities of light on 5 normal male volunteers (age 18-28). The experiment was divided into 3 parts which took place at weekly intervals. Subjects remained under artificial light (fluorescent strip 150-250 lux) between 2000 h-2300 h, they then retired to bed in darkness. On each occasion, between 0030 h and 0100 h, the subjects were required to get up and were treated with light of different intensities; (a) less than 1 lux, (b) 300 lux and (c) 2500 lux respectively. Subjects returned to bed in darkness until 0700 h. Blood was sampled hourly from 2000 h-1000 h with additional samples at 2330 h, 0015 h, 0030 h, 0045 h, 0115 h and 0130 h. Plasma melatonin and 6-sulphatoxymelatonin (aMT6s), the major melatonin metabolite, were measured by radioimmunoassay. Dim (300 lux) and bright (2500 lux) light, both significantly suppressed melatonin levels compared to less than 1 lux (P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.01 respectively) at the following time points 0100 h, 0115 h and 0130 h. One subject did not show suppression with 300 lux. There was also a significant suppression of aMT6s levels, compared to less than 1 lux, after both 300 lux and 2500 lux at 0115 h (P less than 0.05, P less than 0.01), 0130 h (P less than 0.01, P less than 0.01) and 0200 h (P less than 0.01, P less than 0.001) respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Paradoxical masking effects of bright photophase and high temperature in Drosophila malerkotliana

Synergic contribution of light and temperature is known to cause a paradoxical masking effect (inhibition of activity by bright light and high temperature) on various rhythms of animals. The present study reports the paradoxical masking effects of 1000-lux photophase at 25°C on the locomotor activity rhythm of Drosophila malerkotliana. Flies were subjected to light (L)-dark (D) 12:12 cycles wherein the photophase was varied from 10 to 1000 lux, whereas the scotophase was set to 0 lux in these and subsequent LD cycles. At 10, 100, and 500 lux, the flies were diurnal; however, at 1000 lux they were nocturnal. Transfer from LD 12:12 cycles to continuous darkness (DD) initiated free-running rhythmicity in all flies. Free-running rhythms of the flies switched from the 10-lux to the 500-lux groups started from the last activity-onset phase of the rhythm following 3-5 transient cycles, suggesting involvement of the circadian pacemaker. In contrast, the free-running rhythm of the flies of the 1000-lux group began abruptly from the last lights-on phase of the LD cycle, indicating noninvolvement of the pacemaker. Furthermore, all flies showed nocturnal activity in the two types of LD 12:12 cycles when the photophase was 1000 lux. The first type of LD cycles had three succeeding photophases of 100, 1000, and again 100 lux, whereas the second type of LD cycles had only one photophase of 1000 lux, but the LD 12:12 cycles were reversed to DL 12:12 cycles. Apparently, the combined effects of light and temperature caused such paradoxical masking effects. This hypothesis was tested by repeating the above experiments at 20°C. Flies in all experiments exhibited a diurnal activity pattern, even when the photophase was 1000 lux. Thus, the present study demonstrates that the paradoxical masking effect in D. malerkotliana was caused by the additive influence of light intensity and temperature. This strategy appears to have physiological significance, i.e., to shun and thus protect against the bright photophase at high temperature in the field.     

Time-of-day-dependent effects of bright light exposure on human psychophysiology: comparison of daytime and nighttime exposure

Bright light can influence human psychophysiology instantaneously by inducing endocrine (suppression of melatonin, increasing cortisol levels), other physiological changes (enhancement of core body temperature), and psychological changes (reduction of sleepiness, increase of alertness). Its broad range of action is reflected in the wide field of applications, ranging from optimizing a work environment to treating depressed patients. For optimally applying bright light and understanding its mechanism, it is crucial to know whether its effects depend on the time of day. In this paper, we report the effects of bright light given at two different times of day on psychological and physiological parameters. Twenty-four subjects participated in two experiments (n = 12 each). All subjects were nonsmoking, healthy young males (18-30 yr). In both experiments, subjects were exposed to either bright light (5,000 lux) or dim light <10 lux (control condition) either between 12:00 P.M. and 4:00 P.M. (experiment A) or between midnight and 4:00 A.M. (experiment B). Hourly measurements included salivary cortisol concentrations, electrocardiogram, sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale), fatigue, and energy ratings (Visual Analog Scale). Core body temperature was measured continuously throughout the experiments. Bright light had a time-dependent effect on heart rate and core body temperature; i.e., bright light exposure at night, but not in daytime, increased heart rate and enhanced core body temperature. It had no significant effect at all on cortisol. The effect of bright light on the psychological variables was time independent, since nighttime and daytime bright light reduced sleepiness and fatigue significantly and similarly.     

Effect of varying light intensity on maximal power production and selected metabolic variables

This study was designed to examine the effect of exposure to two levels of light intensity (bright; 5000 lux, dim; 50 lux) prior to supramaximal cycle exercise on performance and metabolic alterations. The exercise was performed after bright and dim light exposure for 90 minutes. Ten male long-distance runners volunteered to take part in the study. They performed 45-sec supramaximal exercise using a cycle ergometer in a 500-lux. Mean power output was measured during the exercise. Lactate and ammonia in the blood and epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations in plasma were measured at rest immediately after bright and dim light exposures and after the exercise. Bright and dim light exposure prior to exercise did not significantly affect the power output during the exercise. Blood glucose concentration immediately after exercise and plasma epinephrine during the resting period were significantly lower after bright light exposure compared with dim light exposure (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in blood lactate, ammonia, or plasma norepinephrine levels after exercise following bright and dim light exposures. This study demonstrated that bright light stimulation prior to supramaximal exercise decreases glucose and epinephrine levels, but is not related to physical performance.     

Influence of bright light exposure for several hours during the daytime on cutaneous vasodilatation and local sweating induced by an exercise heat load

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of exposure to differing light intensities for several hours during the daytime on the cutaneous vasodilatation and local forearm sweat rate induced by exercise. Seven healthy female subjects were exposed to bright light of 6000 lux (bright) or dim light of 100 lux (dim) during the daytime between 0900 hours to 1330 hours, followed by exposure to 150 lux until the test was over at 1600 hours. They spent their time in neutral conditions (29°C, 40% relative humidity) from 0900 hours to 1500 hours, and then exercised on a cycle ergometer for 30 min at 50% maximal physical work capacity. Average tympanic temparatures were significantly lower in bright than in dim from 1133 hours to 1430 hours. The onset of cutaneous vasodilatation and local forearm sweating occurred at significantly lower tympanic temperature (T _ty) during exercise after bright than after dim. After exercise, the cessation of forearm sweating and the rapid change of skin blood flow occurred at significantly lower T _ty after bright than after dim. It was concluded that exposure to bright light over several hours during the daytime could reduce T _ty and shift the threshold T _ty for cutaneous vasodilatation and forearm sweating to a lower level. Accepted: 30 March 1998     

Short-wavelength attenuated polychromatic white light during work at night: limited melatonin suppression without substantial decline of alertness

Exposure to light at night increases alertness, but light at night (especially short-wavelength light) also disrupts nocturnal physiology. Such disruption is thought to underlie medical problems for which shiftworkers have increased risk. In 33 male subjects we investigated whether short-wavelength attenuated polychromatic white light (<530?nm filtered out) at night preserves dim light melatonin levels and whether it induces similar skin temperature, alertness, and performance levels as under full-spectrum light. All 33 subjects participated in random order during three nights (at least 1 wk apart) either under dim light (3 lux), short-wavelength attenuated polychromatic white light (193 lux), or full-spectrum light (256 lux). Hourly saliva samples for melatonin analysis were collected along with continuous measurements of skin temperature. Subjective sleepiness and activation were assessed via repeated questionnaires and performance was assessed by the accuracy and speed of an addition task. Our results show that short-wavelength attenuated polychromatic white light only marginally (6%) suppressed salivary melatonin. Average distal-to-proximal skin temperature gradient (DPG) and its pattern over time remained similar under short-wavelength attenuated polychromatic white light compared with dim light. Subjects performed equally well on an addition task under short-wavelength attenuated polychromatic white light compared with full-spectrum light. Although subjective ratings of activation were lower under short-wavelength attenuated polychromatic white light compared with full-spectrum light, subjective sleepiness was not increased. Short-wavelength attenuated polychromatic white light at night has some advantages over bright light. It hardly suppresses melatonin concentrations, whereas performance is similar to the bright light condition. Yet, alertness is slightly reduced as compared with bright light, and DPG shows similarity to the dim light condition, which is a physiological sign of reduced alertness. Short-wavelength attenuated polychromatic white light might therefore not be advisable in work settings that require high levels of alertness. (Author correspondence: maan.van.de.werken@gmail.com)     

Partial sleep deprivation reduces phase advances to light in humans

Partial sleep deprivation is increasingly common in modern society. This study examined for the first time if partial sleep deprivation alters circadian phase shifts to bright light in humans. Thirteen young healthy subjects participated in a repeated-measures counterbalanced design with 2 conditions. Each condition had baseline sleep, a dim-light circadian phase assessment, a 3-day phase-advancing protocol with morning bright light, then another phase assessment. In one condition (no sleep deprivation), subjects had an 8-h sleep opportunity per night during the advancing protocol. In the other condition (partial sleep deprivation), subjects were kept awake for 4 h in near darkness (<0.25 lux), immediately followed by a 4-h sleep opportunity per night during the advancing protocol. The morning bright light stimulus was four 30-min pulses of bright light (~5000 lux), separated by 30-min intervals of room light. The light always began at the same circadian phase, 8 h after the baseline dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO). The average phase advance without sleep deprivation was 1.8 ± 0.6 (SD) h, which reduced to 1.4 ± 0.6 h with partial sleep deprivation (p < 0.05). Ten of the 13 subjects showed reductions in phase advances with partial sleep deprivation, ranging from 0.2 to 1.2 h. These results indicate that short-term partial sleep deprivation can moderately reduce circadian phase shifts to bright light in humans. This may have significant implications for the sleep-deprived general population and for the bright light treatment of circadian rhythm sleep disorders such as delayed sleep phase disorder.     

Paradoxical Masking Effects of Bright Photophase and High Temperature in Drosophila malerkotliana

Synergic contribution of light and temperature is known to cause a paradoxical masking effect (inhibition of activity by bright light and high temperature) on various rhythms of animals. The present study reports the paradoxical masking effects of 1000-lux photophase at 25°C on the locomotor activity rhythm of Drosophila malerkotliana. Flies were subjected to light (L)-dark (D) 12:12 cycles wherein the photophase was varied from 10 to 1000 lux, whereas the scotophase was set to 0 lux in these and subsequent LD cycles. At 10, 100, and 500 lux, the flies were diurnal; however, at 1000 lux they were nocturnal. Transfer from LD 12:12 cycles to continuous darkness (DD) initiated free-running rhythmicity in all flies. Free-running rhythms of the flies switched from the 10-lux to the 500-lux groups started from the last activity-onset phase of the rhythm following 3–5 transient cycles, suggesting involvement of the circadian pacemaker. In contrast, the free-running rhythm of the flies of the 1000-lux group began abruptly from the last lights-on phase of the LD cycle, indicating noninvolvement of the pacemaker. Furthermore, all flies showed nocturnal activity in the two types of LD 12:12 cycles when the photophase was 1000 lux. The first type of LD cycles had three succeeding photophases of 100, 1000, and again 100 lux, whereas the second type of LD cycles had only one photophase of 1000 lux, but the LD 12:12 cycles were reversed to DL 12:12 cycles. Apparently, the combined effects of light and temperature caused such paradoxical masking effects. This hypothesis was tested by repeating the above experiments at 20°C. Flies in all experiments exhibited a diurnal activity pattern, even when the photophase was 1000 lux. Thus, the present study demonstrates that the paradoxical masking effect in D. malerkotliana was caused by the additive influence of light intensity and temperature. This strategy appears to have physiological significance, i.e., to shun and thus protect against the bright photophase at high temperature in the field. (Author correspondence: drdsjoshi08@gmail.com)     

Reduced phase-advance of plasma melatonin after bright morning light in the luteal, but not follicular, menstrual cycle phase in premenstrual dysphoric disorder: an extended study

The authors previously observed blunted phase-shift responses to morning bright light in women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). The aim of this study was to determine if these findings could be replicated using a higher-intensity, shorter-duration light pulse and to compare these results with the effects of an evening bright-light pulse. In 17 PMDD patients and 14 normal control (NC) subjects, the authors measured plasma melatonin at 30-min intervals from 18:00 to 10:00 h in dim (<30 lux) or dark conditions the night before (Night 1) and after (Night 3) a bright-light pulse (administered on Night 2) in both follicular and luteal menstrual cycle phases. The bright light (either 3000 lux for 6 h or 6000 lux for 3 h) was given either in the morning (AM light), 7 h after the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) measured the previous month, or in the evening (PM light), 3 h after the DLMO. In the luteal, but not in the follicular, phase, AM light advanced melatonin offset between Night 1 and Night 3 significantly less in PMDD than in NC subjects. The effects of PM light were not significant, nor were there significant effects of the light pulse on melatonin measures of onset, duration, peak, or area under the curve. These findings replicated the authors' previous finding of a blunted phase-shift response to morning bright light in the luteal, but not the follicular, menstrual cycle phase in PMDD compared with NC women, using a brighter (6000 vs. 3000 lux) light pulse for a shorter duration (3 vs. 6 h). As the effect of PM bright light on melatonin phase-shift responses did not differ between groups or significantly alter other melatonin measures, these results suggest that in PMDD there is a luteal-phase subsensitivity or an increased resistance to morning bright-light cues that are critical in synchronizing human biological rhythms. The resulting circadian rhythm malsynchonization may contribute to the occurrence of luteal phase depressive symptoms in women with PMDD.     

Effect of Evening Exposure to Dim or Bright Light on the Digestion of Carbohydrate in the Supper Meal

In a previous study we found that daytime exposure to bright as compared to dim light exerted a beneficial effect on the digestion of the evening meal. This finding prompted us to examine whether the digestion of the evening meal is also affected by evening light intensity. Subjects lived in light of 200 lux during the daytime (08:00–17:00 h) and took their evening meal at 17:00 h under 20 lux (evening dim‐light condition: 17:00–02:00 h) or 2000 lux (evening bright‐light condition: 17:00–02:00 h) until retiring at 02:00 h. Assessment of carbohydrate digestion of the evening meal was accomplished by a breath hydrogen test that is indicative of the malabsorption of dietary carbohydrate. Hydrogen excretion in the breath in the evening under the dim‐light condition was significantly less than under the bright‐light condition (p < 0.05). This finding is the opposite to that obtained in previous experiments in which subjects were exposed to the different intensities of light during the daytime, and indicates that the exposure to dim light in the evening exerts a better effect on carbohydrate digestion in the evening meal than does the exposure to bright light.     

The relevance of the brightness to visual acuity,predation, and activity of visually hunting ground-beetles (Coleoptera,Carabidae)

Summary Carabid species of the visually hunting type living in dim habitats have larger frontal ommatidia and gain their optimal visual performance with lower light intensity than species inhabiting bright places.The latter phenomenon is based upon the mechanisms of light adaptation, which reduce the acceptance angles of the ommatidia thus increasing their visual acuity. In more sensitive ommatidia adaptation occurs with lower light intensity.The differences between the species concerning the intensity dependence of their visual performance are regarded as an effect of natural selection. Thereafter an apposition eye more sensitive to light should be advantageous in a dim environment.This hypothesis has been investigated and verified by observation of the predation behaviour of Notiophilus biguttatus confronted with Collembola: From 1 to 500 lux the hunting success of the beetles increased proportionally to the light intensity.Measurements of the activity at dawn and at dusk under natural conditions showed that the beginning and the conclusion of activity are correlated with a critical level of illumination. Notiophilus biguttatus starts being active if the illumination is sufficient for successful hunting.Supported by the Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftSupported by the Österreichischer Forschungsrat     

Inferior retinal light exposure is more effective than superior retinal exposure in suppressing melatonin in humans

Illumination of different areas of the human retina elicits differences in acute light-induced suppression of melatonin. The aim of this study was to compare changes in plasma melatonin levels when light exposures of equal illuminance and equal photon dose were administered to superior, inferior, and full retinal fields. Nine healthy subjects participated in the study. Plexiglass eye shields were modified to permit selective exposure of the superior and inferior halves of the retinas of each subject. The Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer was used both to confirm intact full visual fields and to quantify exposure of upper and lower visual fields. On study nights, eyes were dilated, and subjects were exposed to patternless white light for 90 min between 0200 and 0330 under five conditions: (1) full retinal exposure at 200 lux, (2) full retinal exposure at 100 lux, (3) inferior retinal exposure at 200 lux, (4) superior retinal exposure at 200 lux, and (5) a dark-exposed control. Plasma melatonin levels were determined by radioimmunoassay. ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of exposure condition (F = 5.91, p < 0.005). Post hoc Fisher PLSD tests showed significant (p < 0.05) melatonin suppression of both full retinal exposures as well as the inferior retinal exposure; however, superior retinal exposure was significantly less effective in suppressing melatonin. Furthermore, suppression with superior retinal exposure was not significantly different from that of the dark control condition. The results indicate that the inferior retina contributes more to the light-induced suppression of melatonin than the superior retina at the photon dosages tested in this study. Findings suggest a greater sensitivity or denser distribution of photoreceptors in the inferior retina are involved in light detection for the retinohypothalamic tract of humans.     

Reduced Phase-Advance of Plasma Melatonin After Bright Morning Light in The Luteal,But Not Follicular,Menstrual Cycle Phase in Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: An Extended Study

The authors previously observed blunted phase-shift responses to morning bright light in women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). The aim of this study was to determine if these findings could be replicated using a higher-intensity, shorter-duration light pulse and to compare these results with the effects of an evening bright-light pulse. In 17 PMDD patients and 14 normal control (NC) subjects, the authors measured plasma melatonin at 30-min intervals from 18:00 to 10:00?h in dim (<30 lux) or dark conditions the night before (Night 1) and after (Night 3) a bright-light pulse (administered on Night 2) in both follicular and luteal menstrual cycle phases. The bright light (either 3000 lux for 6?h or 6000 lux for 3?h) was given either in the morning (AM light), 7?h after the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) measured the previous month, or in the evening (PM light), 3?h after the DLMO. In the luteal, but not in the follicular, phase, AM light advanced melatonin offset between Night 1 and Night 3 significantly less in PMDD than in NC subjects. The effects of PM light were not significant, nor were there significant effects of the light pulse on melatonin measures of onset, duration, peak, or area under the curve. These findings replicated the authors’ previous finding of a blunted phase-shift response to morning bright light in the luteal, but not the follicular, menstrual cycle phase in PMDD compared with NC women, using a brighter (6000 vs. 3000 lux) light pulse for a shorter duration (3 vs. 6?h). As the effect of PM bright light on melatonin phase-shift responses did not differ between groups or significantly alter other melatonin measures, these results suggest that in PMDD there is a luteal-phase subsensitivity or an increased resistance to morning bright-light cues that are critical in synchronizing human biological rhythms. The resulting circadian rhythm malsynchonization may contribute to the occurrence of luteal phase depressive symptoms in women with PMDD. (Author correspondence: bparry@ucsd.edu)     

Bright-light mask treatment of delayed sleep phase syndrome

We treated delayed sleep phase syndrome (DSPS) with an illuminated mask that provides light through closed eyelids during sleep. Volunteers received either bright white light (2,700 lux, n = 28) or dim red light placebo (0.1 lux, n = 26) for 26 days at home. Mask lights were turned on (< 0.01 lux) 4 h before arising, ramped up for 1 h, and remained on at full brightness until arising. Volunteers also attempted to systematically advance sleep time, avoid naps, and avoid evening bright light. The light mask was well tolerated and produced little sleep disturbance. The acrophase of urinary 6-sulphatoxymelatonin (6-SMT) excretion advanced significantly from baseline in the bright group (p < 0.0006) and not in the dim group, but final phases were not significantly earlier in the bright group (ANCOVA ns). Bright treatment did produce significantly earlier phases, however, among volunteers whose baseline 6-SMT acrophase was later than the median of 0602 h (bright shift: 0732-0554 h, p < 0.0009; dim shift: 0746-0717 h, ns; ANCOVA p = 0.03). In this subgroup, sleep onset advanced significantly only with bright but not dim treatment (sleep onset shift: bright 0306-0145 h, p < 0.0002; dim 0229-0211 h, ns; ANCOVA p < .05). Despite equal expectations at baseline, participants rated bright treatment as more effective than dim treatment (p < 0.04). We conclude that bright-light mask treatment advances circadian phase and provides clinical benefit in DSPS individuals whose initial circadian delay is relatively severe.     

Phase Delaying the Human Circadian Clock with Blue-Enriched Polychromatic Light

The human circadian system is maximally sensitive to short-wavelength (blue) light. In a previous study we found no difference between the magnitude of phase advances produced by bright white versus bright blue-enriched light using light boxes in a practical protocol that could be used in the real world. Since the spectral sensitivity of the circadian system may vary with a circadian rhythm, we tested whether the results of our recent phase-advancing study hold true for phase delays. In a within-subjects counterbalanced design, this study tested whether bright blue-enriched polychromatic light (17000 K, 4000 lux) could produce larger phase delays than bright white light (4100 K, 5000 lux) of equal photon density (4.2×10¹⁵ photons/cm²/sec). Healthy young subjects (n?=?13) received a 2 h phase delaying light pulse before bedtime combined with a gradually delaying sleep/dark schedule on each of 4 consecutive treatment days. On the first treatment day the light pulse began 3 h after the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). An 8 h sleep episode began at the end of the light pulse. Light treatment and the sleep schedule were delayed 2 h on each subsequent treatment day. A circadian phase assessment was conducted before and after the series of light treatment days to determine the time of the DLMO and DLMOff. Phase delays in the blue-enriched and white conditions were not significantly different (DLMO: ?4.45±2.02 versus ?4.48±1.97 h; DLMOff: ?3.90±1.97 versus ?4.35±2.39 h, respectively). These results indicate that at light levels commonly used for circadian phase shifting, blue-enriched polychromatic light is no more effective than the white polychromatic lamps of a lower correlated color temperature (CCT) for phase delaying the circadian clock. (Author correspondence: ceastman@rush.edu)     

Effect of evening exposure to dim or bright light on the digestion of carbohydrate in the supper meal

In a previous study we found that daytime exposure to bright as compared to dim light exerted a beneficial effect on the digestion of the evening meal. This finding prompted us to examine whether the digestion of the evening meal is also affected by evening light intensity. Subjects lived in light of 200 lux during the daytime (08:00-17:00 h) and took their evening meal at 17:00 h under 20 lux (evening dim-light condition: 17:00-02:00 h) or 2000 lux (evening bright-light condition: 17:00-02:00 h) until retiring at 02:00 h. Assessment of carbohydrate digestion of the evening meal was accomplished by a breath hydrogen test that is indicative of the malabsorption of dietary carbohydrate. Hydrogen excretion in the breath in the evening under the dim-light condition was significantly less than under the bright-light condition (p < 0.05). This finding is the opposite to that obtained in previous experiments in which subjects were exposed to the different intensities of light during the daytime, and indicates that the exposure to dim light in the evening exerts a better effect on carbohydrate digestion in the evening meal than does the exposure to bright light.