Chromosome pairing in maize

This report summarizes our observations at pachytene on opposite-arms intercrosses between stocks of interchanges that involve chromosomes 1 and 5 in maize.—Pairing does not begin at the centromeres in these intercrosses.—We propose a model which assumes different probability values along each chromosome arm for the initial or primary site of pairing. Observations on the frequencies of the different types of configurations at pachytene were used to estimate probability values which satisfactorily fit the data.—There is a relatively low probability (of the order of.1 to.3) for the initial pairing to be in a short terminal segment (about.1 of the arm length). Initial pairing in the one or two short segments adjacent to the tip segment is much higher. Initial pairing is much lower in segments successively closer to the middles of the chromosome arms, and then zero or nearly zero in the proximal half of the arm. This means that the initial pairing may fail occasionally even in a relatively long interchanged segment and produce a T-shaped (3-armed) configuration.—After the initial pairing has occurred, the average probability that a secondary site of pairing is adjacent to the centromere in a segment.3 to.4 the length of an arm is low (.13, ranging from.02 to.29).—We can predict that in an intercross in which both breakpoints in both parental interchanges are far out on the chromosomes, "pairs" will be formed with nonhomologous ends (homologous differential segments paired). In these pairing could have begun at any point in the interstitial segments, but not likely in segments close to the centromeres.—Multiple secondary sites which vary in time or in order of pairing will explain the variation in position of the cross-shaped pachytene configuration in interchange heterozygotes.—The observed configuration in any one cell is the result of a particular combination of pairing events at the various sites. This is a very different concept of pairing from previous interpretations which described it as a result of zipper-like action, and the variation in position of the pachytene cross-configuration as the result of "shifts" in position.—Our cytogenetic results and their interpretation are in close agreement with reports on chromosome ultrastructure and molecular events in the early stages of meiosis, i.e. the attachment of chromosome ends to the nuclear membrane, the manner in which synaptonemal complexes develop, and the regions of DNA whose replication is delayed until zygonema.     

Modeling meiotic chromosomes indicates a size dependent contribution of telomere clustering and chromosome rigidity to homologue juxtaposition

Meiosis is the cell division that halves the genetic component of diploid cells to form gametes or spores. To achieve this, meiotic cells undergo a radical spatial reorganisation of chromosomes. This reorganisation is a prerequisite for the pairing of parental homologous chromosomes and the reductional division, which halves the number of chromosomes in daughter cells. Of particular note is the change from a centromere clustered layout (Rabl configuration) to a telomere clustered conformation (bouquet stage). The contribution of the bouquet structure to homologous chromosome pairing is uncertain. We have developed a new in silico model to represent the chromosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in space, based on a worm-like chain model constrained by attachment to the nuclear envelope and clustering forces. We have asked how these constraints could influence chromosome layout, with particular regard to the juxtaposition of homologous chromosomes and potential nonallelic, ectopic, interactions. The data support the view that the bouquet may be sufficient to bring short chromosomes together, but the contribution to long chromosomes is less. We also find that persistence length is critical to how much influence the bouquet structure could have, both on pairing of homologues and avoiding contacts with heterologues. This work represents an important development in computer modeling of chromosomes, and suggests new explanations for why elucidating the functional significance of the bouquet by genetics has been so difficult.     

Effect of the pairing gene Ph1 and premeiotic colchicine treatment on intra- and interchromosome pairing of isochromosomes in common wheat.

The analysis of the pattern of isochromosome pairing allows one to distinguish factors affecting presynaptic alignment of homologous chromosomes from those affecting synapsis and crossing-over. Because the two homologous arms in an isochromosome are invariably associated by a common centromere, the suppression of pairing between these arms (intrachromosome pairing) would indicate that synaptic or postsynaptic events were impaired. In contrast, the suppression of pairing between an isochromosome and its homologous chromosome (interchromosome pairing), without affecting intrachromosome pairing, would suggest that homologous presynaptic alignment was impaired. We used such an isochromosome system to determine which of the processes associated with chromosome pairing was affected by the Ph1 gene of common wheat-the main gene that restricts pairing to homologues. Ph1 reduced the frequency of interchromosome pairing without affecting intrachromosome pairing. In contrast, intrachromosome pairing was strongly reduced in the absence of the synaptic gene Syn-B1. Premeiotic colchicine treatment, which drastically decreased pairing of conventional chromosomes, reduced interchromosome but not intrachromosome pairing. The results support the hypothesis that premeiotic alignment is a necessary stage for the regularity of meiotic pairing and that Ph1 relaxes this alignment. We suggest that Ph1 acts on premeiotic alignment of homologues and homeologues as a means of ensuring diploid-like meiotic behavior in polyploid wheat.     

The initiation of homologous chromosome synapsis in mouse fetal oocytes is not directly driven by centromere and telomere clustering in the bouquet

We investigated the behaviour of centromeres and distal telomeres during the initial phases of female meiosis in mice. In particular, we wished to determine whether clustering of centromeres and telomeres (bouquet formation) played the same crucial role in homologous chromosome pairing in female meiosis as it does in the male. We found that synapsis (intimate homologous chromosome pairing) is most frequently initiated in the interstitial regions of homologous chromosomes, apparently ahead of the distal regions. The proximal ends of the chromosomes appear to be disfavoured for synaptic initiation. Moreover, initiation of synapsis occurred in oocytes that showed little or no evidence of bouquet formation. A bouquet was present in a substantial proportion of cells at mid to late zygotene, and was still present in some pachytene oocytes. This pattern of bouquet formation and pairing initiation is in stark contrast to that previously described in the male mouse. We propose that although dynamic movements of centromeres and telomeres to form clusters may facilitate alignment of homologues or homologous chromosome segments during zygotene, in the female mouse positional control of synaptic initiation is dependent on some other mechanism.     

Components of the RNAi machinery that mediate long-distance chromosomal associations are dispensable for meiotic and early somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila melanogaster

Homolog pairing is indispensable for the proper segregation of chromosomes in meiosis but the mechanism by which homologs uniquely pair with each other is poorly understood. In Drosophila, somatic chromosomes also undergo full homolog pairing by an unknown mechanism. It has been recently demonstrated that both insulator function and somatic long-distance interactions between Polycomb response elements (PREs) are stabilized by the RNAi machinery in Drosophila. This suggests the possibility that long-distance pairing interactions between homologs, either during meiosis or in the soma, may be stabilized by a similar mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we have characterized meiotic and early somatic chromosome pairing of homologous chromosomes in flies that are mutant for various components of the RNAi machinery. Despite the identification of a novel role for the piRNA machinery in meiotic progression and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly, we have found that the components of the RNAi machinery that mediate long-distance chromosomal interactions are dispensable for homologous chromosome pairing. Thus, there appears to be at least two mechanisms that bring homologous sequences together within the nucleus: those that act between dispersed homologous sequences and those that act to align and pair homologous chromosomes.     

Physical distribution of recombination in B-genome chromosomes of tetraploid wheat

Summary Several studies have indicated a noncorrespondence between genetic and physical distances in wheat chromosomes. To study the physical distribution of recombination, polymorphism for C-banding patterns was used to monitor recombination in 67 segments in 11 B-genome chromosome arms of Triticum turgidum. Recombination was absent in proximal regions of all chromosome arms; its frequency increased exponentially with distance from the centromere. A significant difference was observed between the distribution of recombination in physically short and physically long arms. In physically short arms, recombination was almost exclusively concentrated in distal segments and only those regions were represented in their genetic maps. In physically long arms, while a majority of the genetic distance was again based upon recombination in distal chromosome segments, some interstitial recombination was observed. Consequently, these regions also contributed to the genetic maps. Such a pattern of recombination, skewed toward terminal segments of chromosomes, is probably a result of telomeric pairing initiation and strong positive chiasma interference. Interference averaged 0.81 in 35 pairs of adjacent segments and 0.57 across the entire recombining portions of chromosome arms. The total genetic map lengths of the arms corresponded closely to those expected on the basis of their metaphase-I chiasma frequencies. As a consequence of this uneven distribution of recombination there can be a 153-fold difference (or more) in the number of DNA base pairs per unit (centiMorgan) of genetic length.     

Nuclear architecture and chromosome dynamics in the search of the pairing partner in meiosis in plants

The formation of haploid gametes in organisms with sexual reproduction requires regular bivalent chromosome pairing in meiosis. In many species, homologous chromosomes occupy separate territories at the onset of meiosis. To be paired at metaphase I, they need to be brought into a close proximity for interactions that include homology recognition and the establishment of some form of bonds. How homologues find each other is one of the least understood meiotic events. Plant species with large or medium sized genomes, such as wheat or maize, are excellent materials for the cytological analysis of chromosome dynamics at early meiosis, but genes that control meiosis have been identified mainly in small genome species such as Arabidopsis thaliana. This review is focused on the contribution studies on plants are providing to the knowledge of the initial steps of the meiotic process.     

Some characteristics of crossing over in induced recombination between chromosomes of wheat and rye

Allopolyploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) carries three pairs of homoeologous genomes but its meiotic pairing is diploid-like. This is the effect of the Ph (pairing homoeologous) system which restricts chromosome pairing to strictly homologous. Ph1 is the locus with the strongest effect. Disabling Ph1 permits pairing between homoeologues and is routinely used in chromosome engineering to introgress alien variation into breeding stocks. Whereas the efficiency of Ph1 and the general pattern of homoeologous crossovers in its absence are quite well known from numerous studies, other characteristics of such crossovers remain unknown. This study analyzed the crossover points in four sets of the ph1b-induced recombinants between wheat homologues as well as between three wheat and rye (Secale cereale) homoeologous chromosome arms, and compared them to crossovers between homologues in a reference wheat population. The results show the Ph1 locus also controls crossing over of homologues, and the general patterns of homologous (with Ph1) and homoeologous (with ph1b) crossing over are the same. In all intervals analyzed, homoeologous crossovers fell within the range of frequency distribution of homologous crossovers among individual families of the reference population. No specific DNA sequence characteristics were identified that could be recognized by the Ph1 locus; the only difference between homologous and homoeologous crossing over appears to be in frequency. It is concluded that the Ph1 locus likely recognizes DNA sequence similarity; crossing over is permitted between very similar sequences. In the absence of Ph1 dissimilarities are ignored, in proportion to the level of the sequence divergence.     

Nonstructural Chromosome Differentiation among Wheat Cultivars, with Special Reference to Differentiation of Chromosomes in Related Species

Wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) was crossed with cultivars Hope, Cheyenne and Timstein. In all three hybrids, the frequencies of pollen mother cells (PMCs) with univalents at metaphase I (MI) were higher than those in the parental cultivars. No multivalents were observed in the hybrids, indicating that the cultivars do not differ by translocations. Thirty-one Chinese Spring telosomic lines were then crossed with substitution lines in which single chromosomes of the three cultivars were substituted for their Chinese Spring homologues. The telosomic lines were also crossed with Chinese Spring. Data were collected on the frequencies (% of PMCs) of pairing of the telesomes with their homologues at MI and the regularity of pairing of the remaining 20 pairs of Chinese Spring chromosomes in the monotelodisomics obtained from these crosses. The reduced MI pairing in the intercultivar hybrids was caused primarily by chromosome differentiation, rather than by specific genes. Because the differentiation involved a large part of the chromosome complement in each hybrid, it was concluded that it could not be caused by structural changes such as inversions or translocations. In each case, the differentiation appeared to be unevenly distributed among the three wheat genomes. It is proposed that the same kind of differentiation, although of greater magnitude, differentiates homoeologous chromosomes and is responsible, together with structural differentiation, for poor chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids.     

The Development and Meiotic Behavior of Asymmetrical Isochromosomes in Wheat

To determine which segments of a chromosome arm are responsible for the initiation of chiasmate pairing in meiosis, a series of novel isochromosomes was developed in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). These isochromosomes are deficient for different terminal segments in the two arms. It is proposed to call them ``asymmetrical.' Meiotic metaphase I pairing of these asymmetrical isochromosomes was observed in plants with various doses of normal and deficient arms. The two arms of an asymmetrical isochromosome were bound by a chiasma in only two of the 1134 pollen mother cells analyzed. Pairing was between arms of identical length whenever such were available; otherwise, there was no pairing. However, two arms deficient for the same segment paired with a frequency similar to that of normal arms, indicating that the deficient arms retained normal capacity for pairing. Pairing of arms of different length was prevented not by the deficiency itself, but rather, by the heterozygosity for the deficiency. Whether two arms were connected via a centromere in an isochromosome or were present in two different chromosomes had no effect on pairing. This demonstrates that in the absence of homology in the distal regions of chromosome arms, even if relatively short, very long homologous segments may remain unrecognized in meiosis and will not be involved in chiasmate pairing.     

Homologous chromosome pairing.

Commonly accepted precepts are challenged: (1) that homologous chromosome pairing is normally mediated by nuclear envelope attachment sites; (2) that crossover site establishment awaits synaptic completion; and (3) that it is the function of the synaptonemal complex to hold homologues in register so that equal crossing over can occur, and perhaps to provide machinery for the crossover process. Although these views may eventually be shown to be true, it is felt that currently available evidence does not warrant their full acceptance, and that alternatives should be considered. As examples of alternatives the following ideas, with some supporting evidence, are suggested: (1) homologous chromosome pairing (in non-haplont organisms) may be accomplished by chance meeting of homologue segments (followed by establishment of invisible, elastic connectors) at congression for a mitotic metaphase (in many cases perhaps the premeiotic mitosis); (2) crossover sites may be established before, during, or immediately following initiation of synapsis; and (3) the synaptonemal complex may somehow function in the crossover process at the inception of its formation, but its complete deployment throughout each normal bivalent may serve some other role, such as mediation of the binding of sister chromatids apparently required for chiasma maintenance until anaphase I.     

Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and A. fistulosum

The general features and fine structure of homologous chromosome alignment and pairing have been investigated in two species of Allium (A. fistulosum and A. cepa), which have similar karyotypes but very different patterns of chiasma distribution. Although there is no support for the occurrence of a general pre-meiotic alignment of homologous chromosomes, both species show some alignment of homologues as an immediate prelude to synaptonemal complex (SC) formation. In both species pairing usually commences at sub-terminal sites and is succeeded by numerous separate intercalary initiations of pairing in interstitial and distal regions and then in proximal regions. The last parts to pair, in both species, are pericentromeric and telomeric regions. There is, therefore, no evident relationship between the sequence of pairing and chiasma distribution in these species. Regularly alternating convergences and divergences of aligned axial cores (ACs), termed multiple association sites, are frequently observed. It is proposed that these represent potential pairing initiation sites and from observations on their spatial distribution it is argued that they may be evenly distributed through most of the genome. Small spherical or ellipsoid nodules are found at association sites and between closely aligned ACs which persist in the SC segments present during zygotene, but most of them disappear abruptly at the end of zygotene. These are termed zygotene nodules (ZN) and it is proposed that they are involved in matching corresponding sites on homologous chromosomes as well as possibly having a recombinational role. Their composition, structure, mode of action and relationship to pachytene recombination nodules are at present unknown.     

Predicted structures of apolipoprotein II mRNA constrained by nuclease and dimethyl sulfate reactivity: stable secondary structures occur predominantly in local domains via intraexonic base pairing

Analyses of apolipoprotein II mRNA with chemical and enzymatic probes showed that double- and single-stranded regions were distributed uniformly along the mRNA except for a large (72 nucleotides) single-stranded region containing the translation stop codon. Secondary structure models constrained by the experimental data were made by varying the distance (along the mRNA) over which base pairing was allowed. Four prominent secondary structures were seen with restrictions of 165, 330, or 659 nucleotides suggesting that such structures from via local interactions over distances of 50-120 nucleotides. Predicted long range interactions involve only 2-3 base pairs while local interactions involve helices of 4-10 base pairs. Predicted helices of greater than or equal to 4 base pairs occur primarily within exons, raising the possibility that prominent secondary structures in mRNAs may be largely due to intraexonic base pairing. Tests of single- and double-stranded domains by oligonucleotide-directed RNase H cleavage and primer extension were in accord with the structure model and with nuclease and chemical modification data. The model predicting base pairing between the coding and the 3' noncoding regions was tested by RNase H cleavage followed by oligo(dT)-cellulose chromatography to separate 5' and 3' mRNA fragments. Most (82%) of the 5' fragment remained associated with the 3' noncoding region in a structure with a tm = 50 degrees C in 0.2 M Na+ suggesting that this stem could be stable in vivo. This stem may be stable in the isolated mRNA, but would likely occur transiently in polyribosomal apolipoprotein II mRNA due to ribosome transit through the 5' side of the stem. Alternate structures may occur in this region during ribosome transit and play a role in translation termination or in determining the susceptibility of the mRNA to degradation.     

Synaptonemal Complex und Chromosomenstruktur in der achiasmatischen Spermatogenese vonPanorpa communis (Mecoptera)

Meiotic prophase in the spermatocytes ofPanorpa communis was studied. There is a proper sequence of meiotic stages in the testes. Therefore the temporal development of chromosome structure and the synaptonemal complex (SC) could be studied exactly. The structure and function of the SC are interpreted in a new model.—The chromosomes have a lambrush form from leptotene to diakinesis. At leptotene each chromatid produces an additional axis of basic protein and RNA. The axis becomes one of the lateral elements of the SC. At pachytene the DNA of the bivalents is separated into three regions: 1. Most of the DNA forms long loops outside the SC. 2. Smaller portions of the DNA filaments are twisted around the lateral elements of the SC. 3. Short DNA loops (called pairing loops) extend into the pairing space. InPanorpa the SC is composed of two lateral elements (chromosome axes), which are connected by equally spaced transverse filaments, a ladder-like central element in the middle of the pairing space and, on each side of the pairing space parallel to the lateral elements, two RNA containing strands. These are regarded as connected RNA copies of the pairing loops and are responsible for the exact pairing of homologous chromosome segments. At diplotene the axes of the sister chromatids separate to form “double complexes” with four lateral elements. The double complexes of the oocytes contain only transverse filaments between the axes of the homologous chromatids. After a short time they disappear again and the homologues separate to form the chiasmatic bivalents. In the spermatocytes all four chromatid axes are connected by transverse filaments. The pairing complex persists until diakinesis, thereby causing the suppression of the diplotene stage in the light microscope. This may be the only reason for the achiasmatic meiosis in the spermatocytes ofPanorpa.     

The pattern of pairing that is effective for crossing over in complex B-A chromosome rearrangements in maize II

The problem of meiotic homologue pairing is approached by comparing chiasma frequencies in rearranged chromosome segments that differ substantially in relative length and intrachromosomal location. Results are consistent with affirmative answers to some questions previously raised: (1) whether there may be an underlying direct relationship between frequency of pairing and length of segment, (2) whether pairing commonly can be initiated independently in intercalary regions, and (3) whether there also can be a role for extension of pairing in adjoining regions for the establishment of pairing in intercalary regions, which requires pairing partner change. In addition, results here suggest that there may be: (1) greater capacity for establishment of pairing of more distal compared to proximal regions in a way that may also be dependent on their lengths, at least when these are relatively short, and additionally in a way which cannot be attributed to special properties of telomeres, (2) nearly random distribution of pairing of any two genetically long intercalary region representatives where three are present, without regard to the matching of the remainder of the chromosomes involved, and (3) a strong tendency for change of pairing partner in long distal segments when these are present in triplicate. Although sharp heterogeneities of pairing capacity were not found, it is suggested that they may exist with spacing too close for easy detection with the resolving power available.     

Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast

In situ hybridization was used to examine chromosome behavior at meiotic prophase in the rad50S, hop1, rad50, and spo11 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which are defective in chromosome synapsis and meiotic recombination. Painting of chromosomes I and III revealed that chromosome condensation and pairing are reduced in these mutants. However, there is some residual pairing in meiosis, suggesting that homologue recognition is independent of synaptonemal complex formation and recombination. Association of homologues was observed in the rad50, rad50S, and spo11 mutants, which are defective in the formation or processing of meiotic double-strand breaks. This indicates that double- strand breaks are not an essential component of the meiotic homology searching mechanism or that there exist additional or alternative mechanisms for locating homologues.     

The positioning of rye homologous chromosomes added to wheat through the cell cycle in somatic cells untreated and treated with colchicine

The arrangement of chromosome pairs 5RL and 7R added to the wild type and the ph1b mutant line of hexaploid wheat are analyzed in 2N somatic root tip cells during the cell cycle relative to the arrangement that chromosomes 5RL show in 4N tapetal cells produced after colchicine treatment. Both homologous chromosome pairs are identified at interphase and mitosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization. In nuclei at interphase, chromosomes appear as discrete domains that show the Rabl orientation. Homologous chromosomes are predominantly non-associated and their positioning seems not to be influenced by the Ph1 gene that suppresses homoeologous meiotic pairing. This pattern of arrangement contrasts with the high level of somatic pairing that sister chromosomes show in the interphase that follows chromosome duplication induced by colchicine. Disruption of pairing observed in some 4N nuclei is produced at c-anaphase which suggests no topological redistribution of homologues during conformation of the new nucleus. Homologous chromosomes show no predominant arrangement in ellipsoidal metaphase plates, which contrasts with the preferential opposite location of homologues in human prometaphase rosettes. Differences between chromosomes in the variation of the length through the cell cycle and in the chromatin morphology when the Ph1 is absent suggest different patterns of chromatin condensation in both chromosomes.     

Identification of the A and C genomes of amphidiploid Brassica napus (oilseed rape).

A genetic linkage map consisting of 399 RFLP-defined loci was generated from a cross between resynthesized Brassica napus (an interspecific B. rapa x B. oleracea hybrid) and "natural" oilseed rape. The majority of loci exhibited disomic inheritance of parental alleles demonstrating that B. rapa chromosomes were each pairing exclusively with recognisable A-genome homologues in B. napus and that B. oleracea chromosomes were pairing similarly with C-genome homologues. This behaviour identified the 10 A genome and 9 C genome linkage groups of B. napus and demonstrated that the nuclear genomes of B. napus, B. rapa, and B. oleracea have remained essentially unaltered since the formation of the amphidiploid species, B. napus. A range of unusual marker patterns, which could be explained by aneuploidy and nonreciprocal translocations, were observed in the mapping population. These chromosome abnormalities were probably caused by associations between homoeologous chromosomes at meiosis in the resynthesized parent and the F1 plant leading to nondisjunction and homoeologous recombination.