Modified sequential Helicobacter pylori therapy: proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin for 14 days with clarithromycin and metronidazole added as a quadruple (hybrid) therapy for the final 7 days

Background: Ten‐day sequential therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin followed by a PPI, clarithromycin, and an imidazole typically achieves Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of 90–94% (Grade B success). Aims: We tested whether prolonging treatment and continuing amoxicillin throughout the 14‐day treatment period would produce a ≥95% result. Methods: This was a multicenter pilot study in which H. pylori‐infected patients received a 14‐day sequential–concomitant hybrid therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin for 7 days followed by esomeprazole, amoxicillin clarithromycin, and metronidazole for 7 days). H. pylori status was examined 8 weeks after therapy. Success was defined as achieving ≥95% eradication by per‐protocol analysis. Results: One hundred and seventeen subjects received hybrid therapy. The eradication rate was 99.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 97.3–100.0%) by per‐protocol analysis and 97.4% by intention‐to‐treat analysis (95% CI, 94.5–100.0%). Adverse events were seen in 14.5%; drug compliance was 94.9%. Conclusions: Fourteen‐day hybrid sequential–concomitant therapy achieved >95%H. pylori eradication (Grade A result). Further studies are needed 1, in regions with different patterns and frequencies of resistance to confirm these findings, and 2, to examine whether Grade A success is maintained with hybrid therapy shorter than 14 days.     

Is There a Benefit to Extending the Duration of Helicobacter pylori Sequential Therapy to 14 Days?

Background and Aims: Ten‐day sequential therapy with a proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin followed by a PPI, clarithromycin, and an imidazole typically achieves Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates between 90 and 94% (i.e., Grade B success). It has been suggested that prolonging the duration of therapy might improve the treatment success. We tested whether prolonging treatment duration to 14‐days would improve the results to 95% or greater eradication. Methods: This was a multi‐center, single site, pilot study in which H. pylori‐infected patients received a 14‐day sequential therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin for 7 days followed by esomeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole for 7 days). H. pylori status was assessed 8 weeks after therapy. Success was defined as achieving 95% or greater eradication by per‐protocol (PP) analysis. Results: One hundred and twenty‐three subjects received the 14‐day sequential therapy. The eradication rate was 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.5–98.3%) by PP and 91.9% (95% CI, 87.1–96.7%) by intention‐to‐treat analysis. Adverse events were experienced by 21.1%; compliance of 90% or greater was 95.9%. Conclusions: Extending sequential therapy to 14 days did not result in improving the treatment outcome to 95% or greater.     

Nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy: empirical and tailored efficacy versus standard triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible Helicobacter pylori and versus sequential therapy for clarithromycin-resistant strains

Background:  Using quadruple clarithromycin‐containing regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication is controversial with high rates of macrolide resistance. Aim:  To evaluate antibiotic resistance rates and the efficacy of empirical and tailored nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy in a setting with cure rates <80% for triple and sequential therapies. Methods:  209 consecutive naive H. pylori‐positive patients without susceptibility testing were empirically treated with 10‐day concomitant therapy (proton pump inhibitors (PPI), amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg; all drugs b.i.d.). Simultaneously, 89 patients with positive H. pylori culture were randomized to receive triple versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori, and sequential versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin‐resistant strains. Eradication was confirmed with ¹³C‐urea breath test or histology 8 weeks after completion of treatment. Results:  Per‐protocol (PP) and intention‐to‐treat eradication rates after empirical concomitant therapy without susceptibility testing were 89% (95%CI:84–93%) and 87% (83–92%). Antibiotic resistance rates were: clarithromycin, 20%; metronidazole, 34%; and both clarithromycin and metronidazole, 10%. Regarding clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori, concomitant therapy was significantly better than triple therapy by per protocol [92% (82–100%) vs 74% (58–91%), p = 0.05] and by intention to treat [92% (82–100%) vs 70% (57–90%), p = 0.02]. As for antibiotic‐resistant strains, eradication rates for concomitant and sequential therapies were 100% (5/5) vs 75% (3/4), for clarithromycin‐resistant/metronidazole‐susceptible strains and 75% (3/4) vs 60% (3/5) for dual‐resistant strains. Conclusions:  Empirical 10‐day concomitant therapy achieves good eradication rates, close to 90%, in settings with multiresistant H. pylori strains. Tailored concomitant therapy is significantly superior to triple therapy for clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori and at least as effective as sequential therapy for resistant strains.     

High Efficacy of 14‐Day Triple Therapy‐Based,Bismuth‐Containing Quadruple Therapy for Initial Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Background: The success rate of currently recommended 7‐day triple therapy with a PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin has fallen into the unacceptable range. It is urgent to look for a new strategy to treat the infection of Helicobacter pylori. Aims: To observe the efficacy of triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori treatment. Methods: A total of 160 patients with functional dyspepsia who were Hp+ were randomly assigned into two groups. Regimen: Omeprazole 20 mg, Amoxicillin 1.0 g, Clarithromycin 500 mg and Bismuth Potassium Citrate 220 mg, twice a day. Eighty patients received 7‐day quadruple therapy and 80 patients received the same therapy for 14 days. Six weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was assessed by ¹³C‐urea breath test. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin of clinical isolates were determined by the twofold agar dilution method. Results: Fourteen‐day therapy led to a significant increase of H. pylori eradication success when compared to 7‐day therapy in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (93.7 vs 80.0%; p = .01), and the per‐protocol analysis (97.4 vs 82.0%; p = .0016). The H. pylori resistance rates to metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin were 42.1, 18.0 and 0%. Fourteen‐day therapy was significantly more effective in patients with clarithromycin‐resistant strains. Incidences of adverse events were comparable. Conclusions: Addition bismuth and prolonging treatment duration can overcome H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin and decrease the bacterial load. Fourteen‐day triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy achieved ITT success rate 93% and could be recommended as the first line eradication regimen.     

Comparison of lafutidine and rabeprazole in 7-day second-line amoxicillin- and metronidazole-containing triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori: a pilot study

Background: Lafutidine is an H2‐receptor antagonist with gastroprotective action through capsaicin‐sensitive afferent neurons and relatively inexpensive compare to proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs). A 7‐day course of PPIs–amoxicillin–metronidazole is recommended as standard second‐line Helicobacter pylori therapy and is covered by national health insurance in Japan. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of second‐line eradication using the H2‐receptor antagonist lafutidine as a substitute for a PPI. Materials and Methods: Fifty‐two patients who failed in first‐line eradication using PPI–amoxicillin–clarithromycin were randomly assigned to a 7‐day course of rabeprazole at 10 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin at 750 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole at 250 mg b.i.d. (RPZ‐AM) or a 7‐day course of lafutidine at 10 mg t.i.d., amoxicillin at 750 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole at 250 mg b.i.d. (LFT‐AM) as second‐line therapy. Eradication was assessed by the ¹³C urea breath test. A drug susceptibility test was performed before the second‐line therapy. Results: Prior to second‐line H. pylori eradication, the rate of resistance to clarithromycin was 86.5% and the rate of resistance to metronidazole was 3.8%. The eradication rates for both LFT‐AM and RPZ‐AM groups were 96% (95%CI = 88.6–100%). There were no severe adverse events in either group. Conclusions: Lafutidine plus metronidazole–amoxicillin as second‐line therapy provided a high eradication rate and safe treatment similar to a PPI‐based regimen. Lafutidine‐based eradication therapy is therefore considered to be a promising alternative and is also expected to reduce health care costs in H. pylori eradication.     

Vitamin C and E supplements to lansoprazole-amoxicillin-metronidazole triple therapy may reduce the eradication rate of metronidazole-susceptible Helicobacter pylori infection

Aim. To test whether vitamin C and E supplements to triple therapy can improve the Helicobacter pylori eradication rate and gastric inflammation. Methods. A total of 104 H. pylori‐infected patients were randomized to receive: either lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole twice daily for 1 week (triple‐only group) or lansoprazole, amoxicillin, metronidazole plus vitamin C (250 mg) and vitamin E (200 mg) twice daily for 1 week, followed immediately by vitamin C and E once daily for 6 consecutive weeks (triple‐plus‐vitamin group). Eight weeks after the completion of triple therapy, patients were assessed for the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication. The severity of gastric inflammation in histology was assessed for the acute and chronic inflammation scores. Results. Intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol eradication rates were 59.1% and 64.4% in the triple‐only group, and 40% and 44% in the triple‐plus‐vitamin group. In the patients infected with metronidazole susceptible isolates, the triple‐only group had a higher intention‐to‐treat eradication rate than those in the triple‐plus‐vitamin group (80% vs. 53.1%, p < .01). However, for the metronidazole resistance isolates, the intention‐to‐treat eradication rates between the two groups were not different (26.3% vs. 21.7%, p = NS). The improvements of both acute and chronic inflammation scores in histology were not different between the two groups. Conclusion. Adding vitamin C and E to triple therapy cannot improve the H. pylori eradication rate and gastric inflammation. For patients with metronidazole susceptible strain infection, adding these vitamins may even reduce the eradication rate of triple therapy.     

Rabeprazole Can Overcome the Impact of CYP2C19 Polymorphism on Quadruple Therapy

Objectives: The prospective study was designed to clarify the impact of CYP2C19 on quadruple therapies and survey the efficacies of rabeprazole‐based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of standard triple therapies. Patients and Methods: From January 2007 to March 2009, 1055 H. pylori‐infected patients received standard triple regimens (proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin). Helicobacter pylori eradication was achieved in 865 (81.9%) subjects. One hundred ninety eradication‐failure patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a 7‐day eradication therapy. Ninety‐six patients were treated with esomeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (EB), while 94 patients were treated with rabeprazole‐based quadruple rescue therapies (RB). Follow‐up endoscopy was done 16 weeks later to assess the treatment response. Patients’ responses, CYP2C19 genotypes, and antibiotics resistances were also examined. Results: Intention‐to‐treat analysis revealed that RB had better eradication rates than EB (EB: 72.9%; 95% CI: 64.9–80.9% and RB: 78.7%; 95% CI 72.5–84.9%) (p value = .543). Per‐protocol results were EB = 75.3%; 95% CI: 70.3–80.3% and RB = 85.1%; 95% CI: 80.6–89.6% (p value = .0401). Both regimens had similar compliance (p value = 0.155) and adverse events (p value = 0.219). We also surveyed those patients without resistance of any antibiotics. RB still showed better outcome than EB. Our data showed that esomeprazole‐based regimen and CYP2C19 Hom EM genotype were important predictors for eradication failure. Conclusions: In quadruple therapy, rabeprazole‐based regimens had better efficacy than esomeprazole‐based regimens. CYP2C19 polymorphism also played an important role in quadruple therapy. It seems advisable to change PPI to rabeprazole in second‐line quadruple therapy.     

Addition of metronidazole to rabeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection provides an excellent cure rate with five-day therapy

Background. New triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori based on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) provides a cure rate of approximately 90% with few adverse effects. Recently, a PPI-based quadruple therapy, which consists of a PPI plus bismuth-based triple therapy for 7 days, has been studied, and a sufficient eradication rate has been achieved. However, a shorter duration results in improved compliance. In this study, newly developed short-term, simple twice-daily quadruple therapy consisting of rabeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (RACM) was compared with a PPI-based triple-therapy regimen for eradication of H. pylori.
Patients and Methods. This study was designed as a randomized open, prospective single-center study. Of a total of 105 H. pylori –positive patients, 55 received the RACM regimen for 5 days (rabeprazole, 10 mg bid; amoxicillin, 750 mg bid; clarithromycin, 200 mg bid; and metronidazole, 250 mg bid), and 50 received the RAC regimen for 5 days (rabeprazole, 10 mg bid; amoxicillin, 750 mg bid; and clarithromycin, 200 mg bid). Cure of the infection was assessed by HpSA ( H. pylori stool antigen immunoassay) 1 month after completion of therapy.
Results. The rates of eradication of H. pylori by RACM versus RAC were 94.5% (95% CI, 85–99) versus 80.0% (95% CI, 66–90) by intention-to-treat analysis; 98.1% (95% CI, 90–100) versus 87.0% (95% CI, 74–95) by all-patients-treated analysis; and 98.1% (95% CI, 90–100) versus 86.7% (95% CI, 73–95) by per-protocol analysis. No major adverse effects were reported, and 98.0% of patients reported complete compliance.
Conclusions. The simple twice-daily and short-term quadruple regimen for only 5 days provided an excellent eradication rate. Compliance with the regimen was high, and serious adverse effects were few. Therefore, the RACM regimen can be considered as safe and effective.     

A prospective,randomized study of quadruple therapy and high-dose dual therapy for treatment of Helicobacter pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin

Background and Aim. Failure of primary anti‐H. pylori therapy results in a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. Here, we investigated the efficacy of high‐dose dual therapy and quadruple therapy as salvage treatments for eradication of H. pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin. Patients and Methods. Patients with at least one treatment failure and infected with H. pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin, were randomized to receive either omeprazole 4 × 40 mg and amoxicillin 4 × 750 mg; or omeprazole 2 × 20 mg, bismuthcitrate 4 × 107 mg, metronidazole 4 × 500 mg and tetracycline 4 × 500 mg. Both regimens were given for 14 days. In cases of persistent infection, a cross‐over therapy was performed. Results. Eighty‐four patients were randomized. Cure of H. pylori infection was achieved in 31 patients after dual therapy and in 35 patients after quadruple therapy (per protocol: 83.8% (95% CI, 67.9–93.8) and 92.1% (95% CI, 78.6–98.3), respectively (p = 0.71); intention to treat: 75.6% (95% CI: 59.7–87.6) and 81.4% (95% CI: 66.6–91.6), respectively (p = 0.60)). Cross‐over therapy was performed in six of nine patients, four of whom were cured of the infection. Conclusion. Both high‐dose dual therapy and quadruple therapy are effective in curing H. pylori infection resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin in patients who experienced previous treatment failures.     

Impact of furazolidone-based quadruple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori after previous treatment failures

Background. One week of quadruple therapy including metronidazole is recommended for Helicobacter pylori treatment failures after first line therapy regardless of resistance status. This study investigated whether a quadruple regimen containing furazolidone could be effective as a third‐line (salvage) therapy. Methods. All patients with previous H. pylori treatment failure after a clarithromycin‐metronidazole ± amoxicillin combination plus acid suppression were given lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (bid), tripotassiumdicitratobismuthate 240 mg bid, tetracycline 1 g bid, metronidazole 400 mg (PPI‐B‐T‐M) three times a day (tid) for 1 week. In the case of treatment failure with this second‐line therapy, the same regimen was applied for 1 week except for using furazolidone 200 mg bid (PPI‐B‐T‐F) instead of metronidazole (sequential study design). Results. Eighteen consecutive patients were treated with PPI‐B‐T‐M. Eleven of those 18 remained H. pylori positive (38.9% cured). Pretherapeutic metronidazole resistance was associated with a lower probability of eradication success (10% vs. 75%, p= .04). Ten of these 11 patients agreed to be retreated by PPI‐B‐T‐F. Final cure of H. pylori with PPI‐B‐T‐F was achieved in 9/10 patients (90%) nonresponsive to PPI‐B‐T‐M. Conclusions. In the presence of metronidazole resistance, PPI‐B‐T‐M as a recommended second‐line therapy by the Maastricht consensus conference achieved unacceptable low cure rates in our metronidazole pretreated population. In this population, metronidazole based second‐line quadruple therapy may be best suited in case of a metronidazole‐free first line‐regimen (e.g. PPI‐clarithromycin‐amoxicillin) or a low prevalence of metronidazole resistance. Furazolidone in the PPI‐B‐T‐F combination does not have a cross‐resistance potential to metronidazole and is a promising salvage option after a failed PPI‐B‐T‐M regimen.     

A modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy including a short course of furazolidone for Helicobacter pylori eradication after sequential therapy failure

Background: Helicobacter pylori eradication has still remained a challenge, especially in case of failure to novel treatments. Therefore, we designed a study to evaluate the effects of a modified bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy including a short course of furazolidone on a group of patients whose sequential therapy had been unsuccessful. Materials and Methods: Thirty‐six H. pylori‐positive patients who had previously failed a clarithromycin‐containing sequential therapy enrolled the study. They received pantoprazole (40 mg‐bid), amoxicillin (1 g‐bid), and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg‐bid) for 2 weeks and furazolidone (200 mg‐bid) just during the first week. Eight weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was reassessed using C14‐urea breath test. Results: Thirty five patients completed the study. H. pylori eradication rates were 80.6% (95% CI = 67.6–93.5) and 82.9% (95% CI = 70.6–95.2) according to intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses, respectively. All patients had excellent compliance to treatment, and no one interrupted therapy owing to adverse effects. Conclusion: Regarding the eradication rate (>80%), low price, and very low adverse effects, a 2‐week bismuth‐containing quadruple regimen including a short course of furazolidone can be an encouraging regimen for second‐line H. pylori eradication in case of sequential therapy failure. Possibly, it can be improved by alterations in dose, dosing intervals, and/or duration.     

Randomized comparison of two non-bismuth-containing second-line rescue therapies for Helicobacter pylori

Background: Classical second‐line anti‐Helicobacter pylori includes proton‐pump inhibitor, tetracycline, metronidazole, and bismuth salts, but alternative therapies are required owing to the restricted availability of the latter. Levofloxacin‐containing triple therapy is recommended but is expensive. Besides, quinolone resistance in an endemic tuberculosis infection area like Taiwan is concerned. The low in vitro antibiotic resistance to amoxicillin and tetracycline in Taiwanese H. pylori strains implies that in vivo esomeprazole/amoxicillin/tetracycline (EAT) second‐line rescue therapy may be effective. This study compared the efficacy of esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin (EAL) and EAT second‐line eradication therapies and determines the clinical factors influencing the efficacy of salvage regimens. Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty‐eight patients who failed H. pylori eradication using the standard triple therapy for 7 days are randomly assigned to either EAL group (esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, and levofloxacin 500 mg once daily) for 7 days or EAT group (esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg four times daily) for 14 days. Follow‐up endoscopy or urea breath test was performed 8 weeks later to assess treatment response. Results: The eradication rates of EAL and EAT groups were 78.1 versus 75.0%, p = .676 (in intention‐to‐treat analysis) and 80.3 versus 80%, p = .0964 (per‐protocol analysis). Both groups exhibited similar drug compliance (95.3 vs 96.9%, p = .952) but more adverse events in the EAT group (6.3 vs 12.5%, p = .225). Conclusions: Despite low in vitro drug resistances to amoxicillin and tetracycline, the efficacy of 14‐day EAT regimens attained an unacceptable report card of 75% eradication rates in intention‐to‐treat analysis and was not even superior to the 7‐day EAL regimen. Drug–drug interaction between combined antibiotics should be considered other than in vivo drug resistances.     

Colloidal Bismuth Pectin: An Alternative to Bismuth Subcitrate for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori– Positive Duodenal Ulcer

Background. Bismuth triple therapy provides consistently good results in Helicobacter pylori eradication worldwide, whereas quadruple therapy using a combination of omeprazole and bismuth triple regimen has produced cure rates in excess of 90%. The prevalence of metronidazole-resistant strains was 26.8% in our area. Colloidal bismuth pectin (CBP) is a new, lower-priced bismuth salt made in China. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of CBP triple and quadruple regimens in the treatment of H. pylori–positive duodenal ulcer. Materials and Methods. In this prospective trial, 205 patients with H. pylori–positive duodenal ulcer were allocated randomly to receive one of four regimens: metronidazole, 200 mg; amoxicillin, 250 mg; and colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS), 120 mg (group 1), or CBP, 100 mg qid (group 2) for 2 weeks, then continued CBS, 240 mg, or CBP, 200 mg bid for a further 2 weeks. A quadruple regimen using a combination of omeprazole, 20 mg bid, and CBS triple therapy (group 3) or CBP triple therapy (group 4), respectively, was given to patients for 1 week, followed by omeprazole, 20 mg once daily for a further 3 weeks. Further endoscopy was performed at least 4 weeks after cessation of the treatment. H. pylori status was determined by histology, a ¹⁴C urea breath test, and a urease test. Results. The per-protocol H. pylori cure rates were 85% (22 of 26 patients), 90% (35 of 39), 96% (46 of 48), and 95% (75 of 79) for groups 1 through 4. In the intention-to-treat analysis, cure rates were 79% (22 of 28), 83% (35 of 42), 90% (46 of 51), and 89% (75 of 84), respectively. The cure rates of quadruple therapy were higher than those of triple therapy; an 8.2% difference was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3–18.7%). The ulcer-healing rates were 88%, 87%, 98%, and 97%, respectively, for groups 1 through 4. The ulcer pain was relieved more rapidly in quadruple- than in triple-therapy regimens. Two patients discontinued treatment prematurely owing to drug-related side effects. Conclusion. One-week quadruple therapy is highly effective and safe in H. pylori eradication in Chinese patients. CBP is as effective as CBS.     

Pilot studies to identify the optimum duration of concomitant Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Thailand

Background and Aim: Eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori infection with standard triple therapy has globally declined including in Thailand, and new regimens are required that provide reliable high eradication rates. The study was designed to determine whether concomitant therapy administered for either 5 or 10 days would produce a ≥ 95% (grade A) treatment success in H. pylori infected Thai subjects with nonulcer dyspepsia. Methods: Two prospective, but separate, pilot single‐center studies were carried out during September 2009–December 2010 at Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand. H. pylori infected subjects were randomized into the two pilot studies; either 5‐day or 10‐day concomitant therapy. Thai concomitant therapy consisted of rabeprazole (20 mg) twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, metronidazole 400 mg three times a day, and clarithromycin MR 1 g once daily. H. pylori status was assessed by ¹³C‐urea breath test 4 weeks after completion of the treatment. Successful treatment was defined as achieving a grade A result (≥95%) and failure by <90% cured. Results: A total of 110 subjects were randomized (55 to the 5‐day treatment trial and 55 to the 10‐day regimen). Baseline subject demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both studies. All subjects completed their assigned therapies. The 10‐day concomitant treatment trial was successful in 53 of the 55 subjects (96.4%; 95% CI 87.4–99.5%). The 5‐day concomitant pilot was judged to be a failure as only 49 of 55 subjects (89.1%; 95% CI = 77.7–95.8%) were cured. The frequency of adverse events was low and similar in the two studies. Conclusion: The 10‐day concomitant regimen provided excellent treatment success (eradication rate >95%) and was well tolerated. Ten‐day concomitant therapy is likely to become useful first‐line H. pylori eradication in Thailand.     

In Search of the Holy Grail of Heliocobacter pylori Remedies

In this issue, Gisbert et al. (pp. 157–62) present the results of a noncomparative study evaluating a twice daily, 5‐day regimen of ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole twice daily for Helicobacter pylori cure. This study is one of a few stuides that evaluate a 5‐day triple antimicrobial regimen in combination with a antisecretory agent. Although the study design precludes making any definite conclusion, it does encourage additional investigation of these types of regimens. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using regimens containing multiple agents should consider both standard‐of‐care comparator regimens and comparator regimens that will provide a better understanding of why regimens are more effective or better tolerated. The goal of treatment should be to maintain a lower bound 95% confidence interval (CI) of the point estimate of greater than 80% and a ‘delta’ (lower bound 95% CI of the difference in rates) of less than 10%. All RCTs should conduct susceptibility testing to evaluate the impact of resistance on efficacy and explain eradication failures. Finally, consideration should be given to the inclusion of patients with functional dyspepsia in H. pylori studies evaluating H. pylori cure since patients with peptic ulcer disease are becoming harder to find.     

Pretreatment Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Infection: Results of Three Randomized Controlled Studies

Background. Although combinations of antibiotics and antisecretory drugs are useful for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, treatment failure is common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between pretreatment antibiotic resistance and outcome by using six different treatment regimens for H. pylori infection. Patients and Methods. Three hundred sixty-nine consecutive H. pylori–infected patients with dyspeptic symptoms were enrolled in three consecutive randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trials: trial A, 128 patients; trial B, 125 patients; trial C, 116 patients. Treatments consisted of (A) a 15-day course of dual therapy (omeprazole, 20 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg tid) (OA vs OC); (B) a 7-day triple therapy of omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus metronidazole, 500 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1,000 mg bid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg tid (OMA vs OMC); or (C) omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus metronidazole, 500 mg bid, plus tetracycline, 500 mg qid, or doxycycline, 100 mg tid (OMT vs OMD). Diagnostic endoscopy was made in all patients before and 5 to 6 weeks after therapy. Six biopsies were taken from each patient for histology, rapid urease test, and H. pylori culture; antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the E-test method. Results. Overall cure rates were poor for both dual therapies OA and OC (38% and 37%, respectively) and for triple therapies OMA, OMC, and OMD (57%, 55%, and 58%, respectively). The OMT combination was successful in 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.4%–97%). Metronidazole resistance was present in 29.7% (95% CI, 24%–35%), amoxicillin resistance was present in 26% (95% CI, 21%–32%), clarithromycin resistance was present in 23.1% (95% CI, 18%–29%), tetracycline resistance was present in 14% (95% CI, 10%–20%), and doxycycline resistance was present in 33.3% (95% CI, 21%–47%). Antibiotic resistance markedly reduced the cure rates and accounted for most of the poor results with the triple therapies: 89% versus 23%; 77% versus 26%; 100% versus 60%; and 67% versus 23% for OMC, OMA, OMT, and OMD, respectively. OMT appeared to be the best because of the high success rate with metronidazole-resistant H. pylori (71%) and in low-level tetracycline resistance. Conclusions. Pretreatment antibiotic-resistant H. pylori can, in part, explain the low cure rate of the infection and the variability in outcome in reported trials.     

Second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized comparison of 1-week or 2-week bismuth-containing quadruple therapy

Objectives: The increasing levels of bacterial antibiotic resistance have increased the need to evaluate the second‐line treatments for Helicobacter pylori. Bismuth‐based quadruple therapy is recommended as a second‐line treatment, but the optimal duration of this treatment is still debatable. We prospectively analyzed the eradication rate of H. pylori according to the duration of the second‐line bismuth‐based quadruple therapy. Methods: One hundred and ninety‐nine patients who failed at H. pylori eradication were prospectively randomized to receive pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily, metronidazole 500 mg thrice daily, and bismuth subcitrate 300 mg and tetracycline 500 mg four times daily for 7 days (PBMT7) or for 14 days (PBMT14). The post‐treatment H. pylori status was determined by the ¹³C‐urea breath test. The eradication rates, drug compliance, and side effects of each group were evaluated. Results: The intention‐to‐treat (ITT) eradication rates were 81.6% (95% CI 73.9–89.3%, 80/98) in the PBMT7 arm and 85.1% (95% CI 78.2–92.0%, 86/101) in the PBMT14 arm (p = .028, noninferiority test), while the per‐protocol (PP) eradication rates were 89.6% (95% CI 83.2–96.0%, 78/87) and 96.2% (95% CI 92.0–100.0% 77/80) (p = .015, noninferiority test), respectively. The compliance was 88.8% (87/98) and 79.2% (80/101) in the PBMT7 and PBMT14 groups, respectively. (p = .066) The number of patients having severe side effects was 15.3% (15/98) and 21.8% (22/101) in the PBMT7 and PBMT14 groups, respectively, which was similar between both groups. (p = .243). Conclusions: Although PBMT7 was not inferior to PBMT14 statistically, PBMT could not demonstrate enough ITT/PP eradication rate. Therefore, it could be better to extend the duration of treatment for 2 weeks for the second‐line treatment of H. pylori in Korea.     

'Rescue' therapy with rifabutin after multiple Helicobacter pylori treatment failures

Aim. Eradication therapy with proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin is extensively used, although it fails in a considerable number of cases. A ‘rescue’ therapy with a quadruple combination of omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole (or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these same antibiotics) has been recommended, but it still fails in approximately 20% of cases. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a rifabutin‐based regimen in patients with two consecutive H. pylori eradication failures. Patients and Methods. Design: Prospective multicenter study. Patients: Consecutive patients in whom a first eradication trial with omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin and a second trial with omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole (three patients) or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these same antibiotics (11 patients) had failed were included. Intervention: A third eradication regimen with rifabutin (150 mg bid), amoxicillin (1 g bid) and omeprazole (20 mg bid) was prescribed for 14 days. All drugs were administered together after breakfast and dinner. Compliance with therapy was determined from the interrogatory and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. Outcome: H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative ¹³C‐urea breath test 8 weeks after completing therapy. Results. Fourteen patients have been included. Mean age ± SD was 42 ± 11 years, 41% males, peptic ulcer (57%), functional dyspepsia (43%). All patients took all the medications and completed the study protocol. Per‐protocol and intention‐to‐treat eradication was achieved in 11/14 patients (79%; 95% confidence interval = 49–95%). Adverse effects were reported in five patients (36%), and included: abdominal pain (three patients), nausea and vomiting (one patient), and oral candidiasis (one patient); no patient abandoned the treatment due to adverse effects. Conclusion. Rifabutin‐based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline.     

Evaluation of a four-drug, three-antibiotic, nonbismuth-containing "concomitant" therapy as first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen in Greece

Background: The eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with standard treatments are decreasing worldwide as in Greece. Studies with new antibiotic combinations are needed to find better methods of eradication. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of a 10‐day, four‐drug, three‐antibiotic, nonbismuth–containing concomitant regimen. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, open‐label, multicenter study that included 131 patients infected with H. pylori. All patients were diagnosed with peptic ulcer disease or nonulcer dyspepsia by endoscopy. H. pylori infection was established by at least two positive tests among rapid urease test, gastric histology, and ¹³C‐urea breath test. For 10 days, all patients received esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxycillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all b.d. eradication was assessed with ¹³C urea breath test 8 weeks after the start of treatment. Intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol eradication rates were determined. Results: One hundred and twenty‐seven of the 131 patients completed the study. At intention‐to‐treat analysis, the eradication rate was 91.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 85.5–95.7%). For the per‐protocol analysis, the eradication rate was 94.5% (95% CI, 89–97.8%). Adverse events were noted in 42 of 131 (32.1%); drug compliance was excellent with 96.9% of the patients taking more than 90% of the prescribed medication. Conclusion: A 10‐day concomitant regimen appears to be an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated treatment option for first‐line H. pylori eradication in Greece.     

Lafutidine versus Lansoprazole in Combination with Clarithromycin and Amoxicillin for One versus Two Weeks for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Korea

Background and Aims: Lafutidine is a novel H₂‐receptor antagonist with gastroprotective activity that includes enhancement of gastric mucosal blood flow. The aim of the present study was to test the efficacy of 7‐ or 14‐day lafutidine–clarithromycin–amoxicillin therapy versus a lansoprazole‐based regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Methods: Four hundred and sixty‐three patients with H. pylori‐infected peptic ulcer disease were randomized to one of four regimens: (1) lafutidine (20 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days (the 7LFT group) or (2) for 14 days (the 14LFT group); (3) lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.), and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days (the 7LPZ group); or (4) for 14 days (the 14LPZ group). The eradication rates, drug compliance, and adverse effects among the four regimens were compared. Results: The eradication rates by the intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses in the 7LFT and 7LPZ groups were 76.5% and 81.6%, and 76.9% and 82.0% (p = .94 and .95), respectively. The eradication rates by intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses in the 14LFT and 14LPZ groups were 78.2% and 82.2%, and 80.4% and 85.9% (p = .70 and .49), respectively. The treatment duration for 7 days or 14 days did not affect the eradication rates. In addition, the adverse effect rates and discontinuation rates were similar among the four groups. Furthermore, the ulcer cure rate and symptom response rate were similar in the lafutidine and lansoprazole groups. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that lafutidine–clarithromycin–amoxicillin therapy was a safe and effective as lansoprazole‐based triple therapy for the eradication rate of H. pylori, and could be considered as an additional treatment option.