The highly diverged trypanosomal MICOS complex is organized in a nonessential integral membrane and an essential peripheral module

The mitochondrial contact site and cristae organization system (MICOS) mediates the formation of cristae, invaginations in the mitochondrial inner membrane. The highly diverged MICOS complex of the parasitic protist Trypanosoma brucei consists of nine subunits. Except for two Mic10‐like and a Mic60‐like protein, all subunits are specific for kinetoplastids. Here, we determined on a proteome‐wide scale how ablation of individual MICOS subunits affects the levels of the other subunits. The results reveal co‐regulation of TbMic10‐1, TbMic10‐2, TbMic16 and TbMic60, suggesting that these nonessential, integral inner membrane proteins form an interdependent network. Moreover, the ablation of TbMic34 and TbMic32 reveals another network consisting of the essential, intermembrane space‐localized TbMic20, TbMic32, TbMic34 and TbMic40, all of which are peripherally associated with the inner membrane. The downregulation of TbMic20, TbMic32 and TbMic34 also interferes with mitochondrial protein import and reduces the size of the TbMic10‐containing complexes. Thus, the diverged MICOS of trypanosomes contains two subcomplexes: a nonessential membrane‐integrated one, organized around the conserved Mic10 and Mic60, that mediates cristae formation, and an essential membrane‐peripheral one consisting of four kinetoplastid‐specific subunits, that is required for import of intermembrane space proteins.     

Distinct complexes of yeast Snx4 family SNX‐BARs mediate retrograde trafficking of Snc1 and Atg27

The yeast SNX4 sub‐family of sorting nexin containing a Bin‐Amphiphysin‐Rvs domain (SNX‐BAR) proteins, Snx4/Atg24, Snx41 and Atg20/Snx42, are required for endocytic recycling and selective autophagy. Here, we show that Snx4 forms 2 functionally distinct heterodimers: Snx4‐Atg20 and Snx4‐Snx41. Each heterodimer coats an endosome‐derived tubule that mediates retrograde sorting of distinct cargo; the v‐SNARE, Snc1, is a cargo of the Snx4‐Atg20 pathway, and Snx4‐Snx41 mediates retrograde sorting of Atg27, an integral membrane protein implicated in selective autophagy. Live cell imaging of individual endosomes shows that Snx4 and the Vps5‐Vps17 retromer SNX‐BAR heterodimer operate concurrently on a maturing endosome. Consistent with this, the yeast dynamin family protein, Vps1, which was previously shown to promote fission of retromer‐coated tubules, promotes fission of Snx4‐Atg20 coated tubules. The results indicate that the yeast SNX‐BAR proteins coat 3 distinct types of endosome‐derived carriers that mediate endosome‐to‐Golgi retrograde trafficking.      

The mitochondrial uncoupler DNP triggers brain cell mTOR signaling network reprogramming and CREB pathway up‐regulation

Mitochondrial metabolism is highly responsive to nutrient availability and ongoing activity in neuronal circuits. The molecular mechanisms by which brain cells respond to an increase in cellular energy expenditure are largely unknown. Mild mitochondrial uncoupling enhances cellular energy expenditure in mitochondria and can be induced with 2,4‐dinitrophenol (DNP), a proton ionophore previously used for weight loss. We found that DNP treatment reduces mitochondrial membrane potential, increases intracellular Ca²⁺ levels and reduces oxidative stress in cerebral cortical neurons. Gene expression profiling of the cerebral cortex of DNP‐treated mice revealed reprogramming of signaling cascades that included suppression of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and insulin – PI3K – MAPK pathways, and up‐regulation of tuberous sclerosis complex 2, a negative regulator of mTOR. Genes encoding proteins involved in autophagy processes were up‐regulated in response to DNP. CREB (cAMP‐response element‐binding protein) signaling, Arc and brain‐derived neurotrophic factor, which play important roles in synaptic plasticity and adaptive cellular stress responses, were up‐regulated in response to DNP, and DNP‐treated mice exhibited improved performance in a test of learning and memory. Immunoblot analysis verified that key DNP‐induced changes in gene expression resulted in corresponding changes at the protein level. Our findings suggest that mild mitochondrial uncoupling triggers an integrated signaling response in brain cells characterized by reprogramming of mTOR and insulin signaling, and up‐regulation of pathways involved in adaptive stress responses, molecular waste disposal, and synaptic plasticity.

     

Mitochondrial protein import

Most polypeptides of mitochondria are imported from the cytosol. Precursor proteins contain targeting and sorting information, often in the form of amino-terminal presequences. Precursors first bind to receptors in the outer membrane. Two putative import receptors have been identified: a 19-kilodalton protein (MOM19) inNeurospora mitochondria, and a 70-kilodalton protein (MAS70) in yeast. Some precursors integrate directly into the outer membrane, but the majority are translocated through one or both membranes. This process requires an electrochemical potential across the inner membrane. Import appears to occur through a hydrophilic pore, although the inner and outer membranes may contain functionally separate translocation machineries. In yeast, a 42-kilodalton protein (ISP42) probably forms part of the outer membrane channel. After import, precursors interact with chaperonin ATPases in the matrix. Presequences then are removed by the matrix protease. Finally, some proteins are retranslocated across the inner membrane to the intermembrane space.     

Pex19 is involved in importing dually targeted tail‐anchored proteins to both mitochondria and peroxisomes

Tail‐anchored (TA) proteins are embedded into their corresponding membrane via a single transmembrane segment at their C‐terminus whereas the majority of the protein is facing the cytosol. So far, cellular factors that mediate the integration of such proteins into the mitochondrial outer membrane were not found. Using budding yeast as a model system, we identified the cytosolic Hsp70 chaperone Ssa1 and the peroxisome import factor Pex19 as import mediators for a subset of mitochondrial TA proteins. Accordingly, deletion of PEX19 results in: (1) growth defect under respiration conditions, (2) alteration in mitochondrial morphology, (3) reduced steady‐state levels of the mitochondrial TA proteins Fis1 and Gem1, and (4) hampered in organello import of the TA proteins Fis1 and Gem1. Furthermore, recombinant Pex19 can bind directly the TA proteins Fis1 and Gem1. Collectively, this work identified the first factors that are involved in the biogenesis of mitochondrial TA proteins and uncovered an unexpected function of Pex19.      

The Membrane Insertase Oxa1 Is Required for Efficient Import of Carrier Proteins into Mitochondria

Oxa1 serves as a protein insertase of the mitochondrial inner membrane that is evolutionary related to the bacterial YidC insertase. Its activity is critical for membrane integration of mitochondrial translation products and conservatively sorted inner membrane proteins after their passage through the matrix. All Oxa1 substrates identified thus far have bacterial homologs and are of endosymbiotic origin. Here, we show that Oxa1 is critical for the biogenesis of members of the mitochondrial carrier proteins. Deletion mutants lacking Oxa1 show reduced steady‐state levels and activities of the mitochondrial ATP/ADP carrier protein Aac2. To reduce the risk of indirect effects, we generated a novel temperature-sensitive oxa1 mutant that allows rapid depletion of a mutated Oxa1 variant in situ by mitochondrial proteolysis. Oxa1-depleted mitochondria isolated from this mutant still contain normal levels of the membrane potential and of respiratory chain complexes. Nevertheless, in vitro import experiments showed severely reduced import rates of Aac2 and other members of the carrier family, whereas the import of matrix proteins was unaffected. From this, we conclude that Oxa1 is directly or indirectly required for efficient biogenesis of carrier proteins. This was unexpected, since carrier proteins are inserted into the inner membrane from the intermembrane space side and lack bacterial homologs. Our observations suggest that the function of Oxa1 is relevant not only for the biogenesis of conserved mitochondrial components such as respiratory chain complexes or ABC transporters but also for mitochondria-specific membrane proteins of eukaryotic origin.     

tRNA import across the mitochondrial inner membrane in T. brucei requires TIM subunits but is independent of protein import

Mitochondrial tRNA import is widespread, but mechanistic insights of how tRNAs are translocated across mitochondrial membranes remain scarce. The parasitic protozoan T. brucei lacks mitochondrial tRNA genes. Consequently, it imports all organellar tRNAs from the cytosol. Here we investigated the connection between tRNA and protein translocation across the mitochondrial inner membrane. Trypanosomes have a single inner membrane protein translocase that consists of three heterooligomeric submodules, which all are required for import of matrix proteins. In vivo depletion of individual submodules shows that surprisingly only the integral membrane core module, including the protein import pore, but not the presequence-associated import motor are required for mitochondrial tRNA import. Thus we could uncouple import of matrix proteins from import of tRNAs even though both substrates are imported into the same mitochondrial subcompartment. This is reminiscent to the outer membrane where the main protein translocase but not on-going protein translocation is required for tRNA import. We also show that import of tRNAs across the outer and inner membranes are coupled to each other. Taken together, these data support the ‘alternate import model’, which states that tRNA and protein import while mechanistically independent use the same translocation pores but not at the same time.     

Mitochondrial preprotein translocases as dynamic molecular machines

Proteomic studies have demonstrated that yeast mitochondria contain roughly 1000 different proteins. Only eight of these proteins are encoded by the mitochondrial genome and are synthesized on mitochondrial ribosomes. The remaining 99% of mitochondrial precursors are encoded within the nuclear genome and after their synthesis on cytosolic ribosomes must be imported into the organelle. Targeting of these proteins to mitochondria and their import into one of the four mitochondrial subcompartments--outer membrane, intermembrane space (IMS), inner membrane and matrix--requires various membrane-embedded protein translocases, as well as numerous chaperones and cochaperones in the aqueous compartments. During the last years, several novel protein components involved in the import and assembly of mitochondrial proteins have been identified. The picture that emerges from these exciting new findings is that of highly dynamic import machineries, rather than of regulated, but static protein complexes. In this review, we will give an overview on the recent progress in our understanding of mitochondrial protein import. We will focus on the presequence translocase of the inner mitochondrial membrane, the TIM23 complex and the presequence translocase-associated motor, the PAM complex. These two molecular machineries mediate the multistep import of preproteins with cleavable N-terminal signal sequences into the matrix or inner membrane of mitochondria.     

Functional analysis of a recently originating,atypical presequence: mitochondrial import and processing of GUS fusion proteins in transgenic tobacco and yeast

A gene family of at least five members encodes the tobacco mitochondrial Rieske Fe-S protein (RISP). To determine whether all five RISPs are translocated to mitochondria, fusion proteins containing the putative presequences of tobacco RISPs and Escherichia coli -glucuronidase (GUS) were expressed in transgenic tobacco, and the resultant GUS proteins were localized by cell fractionation. The aminoterminal 75 and 71 residues of RISP2 and RISP3, respectively, directed GUS import into mitochondria, where fusion protein processing occurred. The amino-terminal sequence of RISP4, which contains an atypical mitochondrial presequence, can translocate the GUS protein specifically into tobacco mitochondria with apparently low efficiency.Consistent with the proposal of a conserved mechanism for protein import in plants and fungi, the tobacco RISP3 and RISP4 presequences can direct import and processing of a GUS fusion protein in yeast mitochondria. Plant presequences, however, direct mitochondrial import in yeast less efficiently than the yeast presequence, indicating subtle differences between the plant and yeast mitochondrial import machineries. Our studies show that import of RISP4 may not require positively charged amino acid residues and an amphipathic secondary structure; however, these structural properties may improve the efficiency of mitochondrial import.     

Protein composition of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial membranes

Mitochondria consist of four compartments, outer membrane, intermembrane space, inner membrane, and matrix; each harboring specific functions and structures. In this study, we used LC‐MS/MS to characterize the protein composition of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial (mt) membranes, which were enriched by different biochemical fractionation techniques. The analyses identified 202 proteins that contain one or more transmembrane domain(s) and/or positive GRAVY scores. Of these, various criteria were used to assign 72 proteins to mt membranes with high confidence, and 106 with moderate‐to‐low confidence. The sub‐cellular localization of a selected subset of 13 membrane assigned proteins was confirmed by tagging and immunofluorescence analysis. While most proteins assigned to mt membrane have putative roles in metabolic, energy generating, and transport processes, ～50% have no known function. These studies result in a comprehensive profile of the composition and sub‐organellar location of proteins in the T. brucei mitochondrion thus, providing useful information on mt functions.     

The Arabidopsis mitochondrial membrane‐bound ubiquitin protease UBP27 contributes to mitochondrial morphogenesis

Mitochondria are essential organelles with dynamic morphology and function. Post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which include protein ubiquitination, are critically involved in animal and yeast mitochondrial dynamics. How PTMs contribute to plant mitochondrial dynamics is just beginning to be elucidated, and mitochondrial enzymes involved in ubiquitination have not been reported from plants. In this study, we identified an Arabidopsis mitochondrial localized ubiquitin protease, UBP27, through a screen that combined bioinformatics and fluorescent fusion protein targeting analysis. We characterized UBP27 with respect to its membrane topology and enzymatic activities, and analysed the mitochondrial morphological changes in UBP27T‐DNA insertion mutants and overexpression lines. We have shown that UBP27 is embedded in the mitochondrial outer membrane with an N_in–C_out orientation and possesses ubiquitin protease activities in vitro. UBP27 demonstrates similar sub‐cellular localization, domain structure, membrane topology and enzymatic activities with two mitochondrial deubiquitinases, yeast ScUBP16 and human HsUSP30, which indicated that these proteins are functional orthologues in eukaryotes. Although loss‐of‐function mutants of UBP27 do not show obvious phenotypes in plant growth and mitochondrial morphology, UBP27 overexpression can change mitochondrial morphology from rod to spherical shape and reduce the mitochondrial association of dynamin‐related protein 3 (DRP3) proteins, large GTPases that serve as the main mitochondrial fission factors. Thus, our study has uncovered a plant ubiquitin protease that plays a role in mitochondrial morphogenesis possibly through modulation of the function of organelle division proteins.     

Isolation of mitochondrial and plastid ftsZ genes and analysis of the organelle targeting sequence in the diatom Chaetoceros neogracile (Diatoms,Bacillariophyceae)

Mitochondria and plastids multiply by division in eukaryotic cells. Recently, the eukaryotic homolog of the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ was identified and shown to play an important role in the organelle division process inside the inner membrane. To explore the evolution of FtsZ proteins, and to accumulate data on the protein import system in mitochondria and plastids of the red algal lineage, one mitochondrial and three plastid ftsZ genes were isolated from the diatom Chaetoceros neogracile, whose plastids were acquired by secondary endosymbiotic uptake of a red alga. Protein import into organelles depends on the N‐terminal organelle targeting sequences. N‐terminal bipartite presequences consisting of an endoplasmic reticulum signal peptide and a plastid transit peptide are required for protein import into diatom plastids. To characterize the organelle targeting peptides of C. neogracile, we observed the localization of each green fluorescent protein‐tagged predicted organelle targeting peptide in cultured tobacco cells and diatom cells. Our data suggested that each targeting sequences functioned both in tobacco cultured cells and diatom cells.     

Coupling Chemical Energy by the hsp70/tim44 Complex to Drive Protein Translocation into Mitochondria

A dynamic complex between the mitochondrial cognate of hsp70 (mthsp70) and the inner membrane protein tim44 couples energy derived from ATP hydrolysis to drive multiple steps in the mitochondrial protein import pathway: (1) The dependent import step and the mthsp70/tim44 complex cooperate to facilitate the unidirectional transfer of the mitochondrial targeting signal across the inner membrane. (2) The mthsp70/tim44 complex helps to unfold domains on precursors proteins that arrive at the import apparatus in a folded conformation on the cis side of the outer membrane. (3) Completion of import is then driven by the mthsp70/tim44 complex in a manner that is independent of . Mechanisms proposed to explain how the mthsp70/tim44 complex harvests chemical energy to drive these aspects of the import process are discussed.     

Mechanisms of Protein Sorting in Mitochondria

A protein’s function is intimately linked to its correct subcellular location, yet the machinery required for protein synthesis is predominately cytosolic. How proteins are trafficked through the confines of the cell and integrated into the appropriate cellular compartments has puzzled and intrigued researchers for decades. Indeed, studies exploring this premise revealed elaborate cellular protein translocation and sorting systems, which ensure that all proteins are shuttled to the appropriate cellular destination, where they fulfill their specific functions. This holds true for mitochondria, where sophisticated molecular machines serve to recognize incoming precursor proteins and integrate them into the functional framework of the organelle. We summarize the recent progress in our understanding of mitochondrial protein sorting and the machineries and mechanisms that mediate and regulate this highly dynamic cellular process essential for survival of virtually all eukaryotic cells.Mitochondria are multifunctional double-membrane-bound organelles that arose from a bacterial endosymbiont during the evolution of eukaryotic cells. Known as the powerhouses of the cell, mitochondria harbor the oxidative phosphorylation machinery for ATP synthesis, but also a large number of biosynthetic pathways. Moreover, they are intimately involved in complex cellular processes, like calcium homeostasis and programmed cell death. As a relic of their evolutionary origin, mitochondria contain their own genetic material and machineries to manufacture their own RNAs and proteins. However, the small circular mitochondrial genome encodes only a few proteins (8 and 13 polypeptides in yeast and humans, respectively). All remaining mitochondrial proteins (approximately 99%) are encoded by the nuclear genome and synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes in their precursor forms. To acquire their mature, functional state these precursor proteins need to be efficiently targeted and imported into mitochondria and sorted to the correct submitochondrial compartment: outer membrane, intermembrane space (IMS), inner membrane, and matrix. The inner mitochondrial membrane is further subdivided into the inner boundary membrane, which is closely opposed to the outer membrane, and large tubular invaginations, termed cristae membranes. Within the four mitochondrial compartments, sophisticated translocation, sorting, and assembly machineries serve to establish incoming precursors in a functional state within the context of their new environment. Advances in the last decade, particularly because of the application of proteomic approaches, have significantly extended the number of components and machineries known to be involved in mitochondrial protein import (Sickmann et al. 2003; Prokisch et al. 2004; Reinders et al. 2006; Pagliarini et al. 2008). These and previous discoveries have provided us with the current framework, which suggests the presence of at least six distinct translocation and assembly machineries within mitochondria (Fig. 1). In this article, we will summarize our current understanding of the machineries for mitochondrial protein import and describe the different molecular mechanisms that execute this essential task.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Overview of mitochondrial protein sorting pathways. Cytosolic chaperones deliver precursor proteins to the organelle in a translocation-competent state. Some α-helical proteins are inserted into the outer membrane with the help of Mim1. Virtually all other precursors initially traverse the outer membrane via the TOM complex and are subsequently routed to downstream sorting pathways. Biogenesis of outer membrane β-barrel proteins requires the small TIM chaperones of the IMS and the SAM complex. Cysteine-containing IMS proteins are imported via the MIA pathway. Metabolite carriers of the inner mitochondrial membrane are transferred by the small TIM chaperones to the TIM22 complex, which mediates their membrane integration. Presequence-containing precursors are directly taken over from the TOM complex by the TIM23 machinery that either inserts these proteins into the membrane or translocates them into the matrix in cooperation with the import motor PAM. OM, outer membrane; IMS, intermembrane space; IM, inner membrane, Δψ, membrane potential across the inner mitochondrial membrane.     

Mechanisms of protein translocation into mitochondria

Mitochondrial biogenesis utilizes a complex proteinaceous machinery for the import of cytosolically synthesized preproteins. At least three large multisubunit protein complexes, one in the outer membrane and two in the inner membrane, have been identified. These translocase complexes cooperate with soluble proteins from the cytosol, the intermembrane space and the matrix. The translocation of presequence-containing preproteins through the outer membrane channel includes successive electrostatic interactions of the charged mitochondrial targeting sequence with a chain of import components. Translocation across the inner mitochondrial membrane utilizes the energy of the proton motive force of the inner membrane and the hydrolysis of ATP. The matrix chaperone system of the mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 forms an ATP-dependent import motor by interaction with the polypeptide chain in transit and components of the inner membrane translocase. The precursors of integral inner membrane proteins of the metabolite carrier family interact with newly identified import components of the intermembrane space and are inserted into the inner membrane by a second translocase complex. A comparison of the full set of import components between the yeast Sacccharomyces cerevisiae and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans demonstrates an evolutionary conservation of most components of the mitochondrial import machinery with a possible greater divergence for the import pathway of the inner membrane carrier proteins.     

Using HHsearch to tackle proteins of unknown function: A pilot study with PH domains

Advances in membrane cell biology are hampered by the relatively high proportion of proteins with no known function. Such proteins are largely or entirely devoid of structurally significant domain annotations. Structural bioinformaticians have developed profile‐profile tools such as HHsearch (online version called HHpred), which can detect remote homologies that are missed by tools used to annotate databases. Here we have applied HHsearch to study a single structural fold in a single model organism as proof of principle. In the entire clan of protein domains sharing the pleckstrin homology domain fold in yeast, systematic application of HHsearch accurately identified known PH‐like domains. It also predicted 16 new domains in 13 yeast proteins many of which are implicated in intracellular traffic. One of these was Vps13p, where we confirmed the functional importance of the predicted PH‐like domain. Even though such predictions require considerable work to be corroborated, they are useful first steps. HHsearch should be applied more widely, particularly across entire proteomes of model organisms, to significantly improve database annotations.      

Erv1 mediates the Mia40-dependent protein import pathway and provides a functional link to the respiratory chain by shuttling electrons to cytochrome c

Unlike matrix-targeted or inner membrane proteins, those that are targeted to the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS) do not require ATP or the inner membrane electrochemical potential. Their import is mediated primarily by the essential IMS protein Mia40/Tim40. Here, we show that the mitochondrial flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-linked sulfhydryl oxidase Erv1 (essential for respiration and vegetative growth 1) plays a central role in the biogenesis of small, cysteine proteins of the IMS that are import substrates for Mia40. In a temperature-sensitive strain of Erv1, steady-state levels of small translocases of the inner membrane (Tims) are specifically affected when cells are grown at the non-permissive temperature. Furthermore, mitochondria isolated from the erv1-ts show a specific import and assembly defect for the small Tims but not in any other protein import pathway. Erv1 does not directly oxidise the small Tims, as thiol trapping assays show that the small Tims can still be oxidised in erv1-ts cells grown at the non-permissive temperature and in isolated mitochondria from this strain. Moreover, addition of pure Erv1 into erv1-ts mitochondria lacking the endogenous protein restores import and assembly of the small Tims only to an extent, arguing for a cascade of interactions with Erv1 rather than for a direct interaction of Erv1 with the small Tims. Cytochrome c (cyt c) is the in vivo oxidase for Erv1, as yeast cells mutated in cyt c cannot grow under anaerobic conditions. Therefore, Erv1 functionally links the Mia40-dependent import pathway to the Mia40-independent cyt c import pathway transferring electrons from the incoming precursors to cyt c as an acceptor. In this context, the protein import process is linked to the respiratory chain via the communication of Erv1 with cyt c.