Improved Method for Purification of Bacterial DNA from Bovine Milk for Detection of Brucella spp. by PCR

Different methods of extraction of bacterial DNA from bovine milk to improve the direct detection of Brucella by PCR were evaluated. We found that the use of a lysis buffer with high concentrations of Tris, EDTA, and NaCl, high concentrations of sodium dodecyl sulfate and proteinase K, and high temperatures of incubation was necessary for the efficient extraction of Brucella DNA. The limit of detection by PCR was 5 to 50 Brucella CFU/ml of milk.     

Direct detection of Brucella spp. in raw milk by PCR and reverse hybridization with 16S-23S rRNA spacer probes.

The 16S-23S rRNA spacer regions of Brucella abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis were cloned and subcloned after PCR amplification. Sequence analysis of the inserts revealed a spacer of about 800 bp with very high ( > 99%) homology among the three species examined. Two genus-specific primer pairs, BRU-P5-BRU-P8 and BRU-P6-BRU-P7, that could be used in a nested PCR format and three genus-specific DNA probes, BRU-ICG2, BRU-ICG3, and BRU-ICG4, were deduced from this spacer. The specificity and sensitivity of both primer sets and probes were examined by testing them against a collection of 18 Brucella strains and 56 strains from other relevant taxa by using PCR and the Line Probe Assay (LiPA), respectively. A method for direct detection of Brucella spp. in 1 ml of raw milk was developed on the basis of enzymatic treatment of the milk components and subsequent PCR and LiPA hybridization. After a single PCR, sensitivities of 2.8 x 10(5) and 2.8 x 10(4) CFU/ml were obtained for detection by agarose gel electrophoresis and LiPA, respectively. Nested PCR yielded a sensitivity of 2.8 x 10(2) CFU/ml for both methods.     

Comparison of different PCR methods for detection of Brucella spp. in human blood samples

For detection of Brucella species by PCR four DNA extraction methods and four targets were compared using pure culture of Brucella melitensis and the best conditions were applied in clinical samples. It was found that the MagNA Pure LC method was the most efficient and sensitive method showing a positive PCR reaction with DNA extracted from as low as 25 and 100 CFU suspended in one ml blood and one ml water, respectively. Detection of Brucella spp. by conventional PCR was investigated using four different targets. The results indicated that The B4-B5 amplification method was the most sensitive one as it could amplify DNA extracted from as a low as 25 and 100 CFU/ml suspended in one ml water and blood, respectively. Furthermore real-time PCR was able to detect Brucella using DNA extracted from as low as 50 CFU/ml blood and 15 CFU/ml water, respectively. The best and optimum detection conditions were applied to the clinical samples. Evaluation of conventional PCR assays on blood specimens confirmed 72% of the results obtained by conventional blood culture methods with a specificity of 95%, while serum samples had a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 100%. Real-time PCR was generally found to be more sensitive and specific for detecting Brucella spp. in blood and serum samples compared to conventional PCR. The real-time PCR done on blood specimens confirmed 77.5% of the results obtained by conventional blood culture methods with specificity of 100%, while 60% of serum samples were found to be positive with specificity of 100%. These results suggest that serum and blood analysis by conventional and real time PCR is a convenient and safe method for rapid and accurate diagnosis of brucellosis.     

RAPID DETECTION OF BRUCELLA ABORTUS BY A NOVEL PROXIMITY LIGATION-BASED LOOP-MEDIATED ISOTHERMAL AMPLIFICATION METHOD

Brucellosis is one of the most common zoonotic diseases, and current methods of detecting this pathogen are quite difficult. This work combines the benefits of a proximity ligation assay with those of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method to develop a novel proximity ligation-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification method useful for Brucella detection. The genomic DNA extraction procedure is not needed. Sensitivity of this assay for detecting Brucella abortus is 1  ×  10⁴ cells/mL in buffer and 1  ×  10⁵ cells/mL in milk. The time to detection is within 2 h of initiating the procedure, and no special equipment is needed. This new method is also suitable for the detection of other pathogens, and as such will be useful in the food safety industry.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitivity method for microbe detection, but the complicated genomic DNA extraction procedure and costly equipment needed for this method makes the PCR method unpopular in developing countries. In this study, we present the novel proximity ligation-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification (P-LAMP) method for Brucella detection; this is the first time to combine the monoclonal antibody for identify microbe and LAMP method for high performance amplification DNA. The genomic DNA extraction procedure is not needed and a water-bath boiler is the only equipment required to complete the detection process. The P-LAMP method is useful for food safety pathogen detection in developing countries.     

Improved template DNA preparation procedure for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk by PCR

Factors affecting the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) by PCR in raw milk and their interactions were investigated. Three day old bulk tank raw milk (50 ml) samples were seeded with MAP at a level of an estimated 30 CFU/ml. Heat-treatment of raw milk before centrifugation significantly affected the partitioning of MAP in the cream, whey and pellet fractions. Based on the IS900 PCR results, MAP preferentially partitioned into the cream fraction in unheated raw milk, and into the pellet fraction in the heat-treated milk. Treatment with 0.75% hexadecylpyridinium chloride (HPC) helped collect MAP in cream fraction. Heat treatment, use of pooled cream and pellet fractions and treatment with HPC improved the detection by PCR significantly, while washing of pellets prior to DNA extraction did not. The limit of detection using our optimized procedure was an estimated 15-50 CFU in 50 ml, or 相似文献   

A comparison of methods for the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from artificially-contaminated dairy products using PCR

Rapid nucleic acid-based methods to detect human pathogens in foods are dependent on the reliability of the DNA or RNA extraction method used. Skim milk, non-fat dry milk, Cheddar and Brie cheese, and reconstituted whey powder were seeded with serially diluted (10(0)-10(7) cfu 10 ml(-1)) Escherichia coli O157:H7 and subjected to DNA extraction (i) directly from the food product using a solvent-based procedure and (ii) using a guanidinium isothiocyanate (GITC) procedure after previous bacterial concentration. Both the efficiency of DNA extraction and the overall PCR detection limits were evaluated. In almost all instances, the total DNA yield using the solvent method was greater than that obtained for the concentration method. However, the purity of the DNA obtained after bacterial concentration was significantly better than that obtained after organic extraction alone. PCR detection limits after each DNA recovery method varied with the specific food, ranging from 10(1) to 10(4) cfu ml(-1) for all products except whey powder. DNA yields and subsequent PCR detection limits for reconstituted whey powder were extremely poor, and neither procedural changes nor the addition of PCR enhancement agents were able to improve recovery and/or detection. It is concluded that the efficiency of DNA extraction is an extremely important and frequently overlooked variable impacting the overall detection limits of PCR-based detection strategies.     

Sensitive and specific detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and ground beef with the polymerase chain reaction.

A sensitive and specific method for detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and ground-beef samples is described. It consists of culturing samples in listeria enrichment broth (LEB) and subculturing them from LEB to listeria plating media, followed by DNA extraction and species-specific detection of the organism by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In developing the L. monocytogenes PCR assay, five oligonucleotide primers complementary to the nucleotide sequence of the listeriolysin O gene were synthesized and used in amplification experiments. PCR products of the predicted size, based on nucleotide sequence information, were generated with DNA from all of 72 L. monocytogenes strains with five different primer pairs. DNA from Listeria ivanovii, Listeria innocua, Listeria seeligeri, Listeria welshimeri, Listeria grayi, and Listeia murrayi strains and a panel of 47 bacterial strains representing 17 genera did not generate PCR products with the primer pairs employed. As little as 1 pg of L. monocytogenes DNA could be detected with the assay. To determine the most sensitive culture protocol to use in conjunction with the PCR assay, milk (10 ml) and ground-beef (25 g) samples were inoculated with L. monocytogenes at concentrations ranging from 0 to 10(5) CFU ml-1 or g-1, as appropriate for the sample. PCR assays on DNA extracted from growth on listeria plating media, inoculated with 24-h LEB samples cultures, were most sensitive, allowing detection of as little as 0.1 CFU of L. monocytogenes ml-1 or g-1 of milk and ground beef, respectively.     

Sensitive and specific detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and ground beef with the polymerase chain reaction.

A sensitive and specific method for detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and ground-beef samples is described. It consists of culturing samples in listeria enrichment broth (LEB) and subculturing them from LEB to listeria plating media, followed by DNA extraction and species-specific detection of the organism by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In developing the L. monocytogenes PCR assay, five oligonucleotide primers complementary to the nucleotide sequence of the listeriolysin O gene were synthesized and used in amplification experiments. PCR products of the predicted size, based on nucleotide sequence information, were generated with DNA from all of 72 L. monocytogenes strains with five different primer pairs. DNA from Listeria ivanovii, Listeria innocua, Listeria seeligeri, Listeria welshimeri, Listeria grayi, and Listeia murrayi strains and a panel of 47 bacterial strains representing 17 genera did not generate PCR products with the primer pairs employed. As little as 1 pg of L. monocytogenes DNA could be detected with the assay. To determine the most sensitive culture protocol to use in conjunction with the PCR assay, milk (10 ml) and ground-beef (25 g) samples were inoculated with L. monocytogenes at concentrations ranging from 0 to 10(5) CFU ml-1 or g-1, as appropriate for the sample. PCR assays on DNA extracted from growth on listeria plating media, inoculated with 24-h LEB samples cultures, were most sensitive, allowing detection of as little as 0.1 CFU of L. monocytogenes ml-1 or g-1 of milk and ground beef, respectively.     

Identification and detection of Bacillus sporothermodurans spores in 1, 10, and 100 milliliters of raw milk by PCR.

A PCR method was developed to detect spores of Bacillus sporothermodurans in 1, 10, and 100 ml of raw milk. Two primers were derived from a unique sequence after subtractive hybridization of B. sporothermodurans DNA with DNA of MB 397, a not yet identified spore-forming bacterium isolated from raw milk, closely related to B. sporothermodurans. Specific identification was proven on a large collection of Bacillus strains and on strains from relevant taxa. The detection of B. sporothermodurans in raw milk is based on activation, germination, and outgrowth of the spores, followed by PCR identification. Spores from 10 and 100 ml were concentrated by centrifugation after chemical extraction of the milk components. The total test takes 28 h. The detection limits are 9, 0.4, and 0.22 CFU/ml for 1, 10, and 100 ml, respectively.     

A direct PCR detection method for Clostridium tyrobutyricum spores in up to 100 milliliters of raw milk.

A direct detection method for Clostridium tyrobutyricum spores in up to 100 ml of raw milk is presented. The bacterial spores are concentrated by centrifugation after chemical extraction of the milk components. The vegetative cells are selectively lysed, and their DNA is digested and washed away. Afterwards, the DNA is liberated from the spores by microwave treatment. For the identification of the C. tyrobutyricum DNA, a two-step PCR method with two nested pairs of primers is used. The primers were derived from the 16S-23S rRNA spacer region of C. tyrobutyricum, and the specificity of each of them for C. tyrobutyricum is demonstrated. The detection limit can be estimated to be between 3 and 30 spores in 100 ml of raw milk.     

Preliminary development of a diagnostic test for Brucella using polymerase chain reaction

A highly sensitive and specific diagnostic test for Brucella based on polymerase chain reaction is under development in our laboratory. A commercially available PCR kit was used to create primers that allowed the amplification of a 635 bp fragment of a 43 kDa outer membrane protein gene from Brucella abortus strain 19. We successfully amplified the cloned gene present in the pMS64 plasmid and genomic Brucella S19 DNA. The amplified DNA was easily detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. Using both the pMS64 plasmid and Br. abortus S19 purified DNA as template each component of the PCR reaction was adjusted for the optimum amplification of the DNA sequence. Optimum specific amplification resulted when the primer annealing temperature was 60C. The gene fragment was amplifiable in 25 different Brucella species and strains. To test the specificity of the reaction, DNA extracted from 17 micro-organisms possibly associated with cattle were tested. No amplification was observed. The sensitivity of the reaction was determined with different concentrations of genomic Brucella strain 19 DNA. As little as 0.1 pg DNA (less than 100 brucella cells) could be detected. The specificity and sensitivity of PCR combined with its simplicity and speed suggests the potential of this technique for routine diagnosis of brucellosis.     

Development of a method for alkaline extraction of DNA from Brucella for diagnosing brucellosis using the polymerase chain reaction

Several methods of alkaline extraction of chromosome DNA from Brucella in the presence of 50 microliters model diagnostic material blood serum are developed for the diagnosis of brucellosis by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These methods are based on the capacity of NaOH to effectively denature proteins and destroy Brucella cell wall, thus isolating the genome DNA without exposure to proteolytic enzymes, detergents, deproteinization, or pH neutralization. The first method consists in alkaline lysis by 0.2-1.0 M NaOH followed by DNA precipitation with two ethanol volumes in the presence of 0.1 M NaCl, washing of the resultant precipitate in 80% ethanol, drying of the precipitate, and dissolving in distilled water. The second method includes alkaline lysis in the presence of 0.3 M NaCl with NaOH concentrations of 0.5-4.3 M and the stages of DNA sedimentation, washing of precipitate, its drying and dissolving similar to those in alkaline lysis. The third method consists in alkaline lysis-precipitation by 0.2-05 M NaOH in the presence of 0.1 M NaCl and 64% ethanol, followed by DNA preparation stages similar to those in alkaline lysis. The best results were achieved by alkaline lysis in the presence of 0.3 M NaCl at NaOH concentrations of 0.7 and 2.1 M, which meant theoretical levels of sensitivity 140 and 86 Brucella cells, respectively.     

Preliminary development of a diagnostic test for Brucella using polymerase chain reaction

A highly sensitive and specific diagnostic test for Brucella based on polymerase chain reaction is under development in our laboratory. A commercially available PCR kit was used to create primers that allowed the amplification of a 635 bp fragment of a 43 kDa outer membrane protein gene from Brucella abortus strain 19. We successfully amplified the cloned gene present in the pMS64 plasmid and genomic Brucella S19 DNA. The amplified DNA was easily detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. Using both the pMS64 plasmid and Br. abortus S19 purified DNA as template each component of the PCR reaction was adjusted for the optimum amplification of the DNA sequence. Optimum specific amplification resulted when the primer annealing temperature was 60 degrees C. The gene fragment was amplifiable in 25 different Brucella species and strains. To test the specificity of the reaction, DNA extracted from 17 micro-organisms possibly associated with cattle were tested. No amplification was observed. The sensitivity of the reaction was determined with different concentrations of genomic Brucella strain 19 DNA. As little as 0.1 pg DNA (less than 100 brucella cells) could be detected. The specificity and sensitivity of PCR combined with its simplicity and speed suggests the potential of this technique for routine diagnosis of brucellosis.     

Comparison of three different PCR methods for detection of Brucella spp in human blood samples

In the diagnosis of human brucellosis, PCR could be a more sensitive technique than blood cultures and more specific than conventional serological tests. We compared three different PCR methods for the detection of Brucella spp. and we studied whether human genomic DNA affect the sensitivity of three primer pairs for the detection of Brucella DNA in a peripheral-blood PCR assay. These three pairs of primers amplified three different fragments included in: (i). a gene encoding a 31-kDa Brucella abortus antigen (primers B4/B5), (ii). a sequence 16S rRNA of B. abortus (primers F4/R2), and (iii). a gene encoding an outer membrane protein (omp-2) (primers JPF/JPR). The three primers assayed showed a difference in sensitivity for detecting purified Brucella DNA, ranging between 8 fg and 20 pg. However, the sensitivity of the primers F4/R2 and B4/B5 was affected by the presence of human DNA while the primers JPF/JPR were not. Therefore, although the sensitivity of PCR using primers F4/R2 is affected by human DNA, they are still the most sensitive and they could provide a useful tool for the diagnosis of human brucellosis.     

Rapid detection of Brucella spp. by the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method

Aims:  To develop a rapid and sensitive method for detecting Brucella spp.
Methods and Results:  Two sets of six Brucella -specific primers for loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) were designed from the sequence of the Brucella abortus BCSP31 gene. The specificity and sensitivity were examined for six Brucella species (22 strains) and 18 non- Brucella species (28 strains). The LAMP assay was specific to Brucella spp. in 35 min at 63°C and sensitive (detected 10 fg of genomic DNA). The assay was also applied for the detection of Brucella DNA in contaminated milk and infected mouse organs.
Conclusions:  We developed a sensitive and specific LAMP assay for Brucella spp., with the test appearing to be useful for the detection of the pathogen from clinical and food samples.
Significance and Impact of the Study:  This is the first report of the development of LAMP for the detection of Brucella spp. As the LAMP assay can be performed at a constant temperature and its reactivity is directly observed with the naked eye without electrophoresis, our assay should be useful for the diagnosis of brucellosis as well as the detection of the bacteria in environmental or food samples.     

Evaluation of three polymerase chain reaction techniques for detection of Brucella DNA in peripheral human blood

Brucellosis is a widespread zoonosis. Currently the diagnosis of this zoonosis is based on microbiological and serological laboratory tests. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used to detect DNA from Brucella. Different target genes, primer pairs, PCR techniques, and extraction procedures have previously been published for Brucella detection. But only a few of these primers have been used in human samples, and only one study has been carried out to compare sensitivity between them. In the present study, 3 sets of primers and 3 different PCR protocols amplifying 3 different regions of the Brucella genome were compared for detection of Brucella DNA in a peripheral-blood PCR assay to conclude which is most suitable for the clinical diagnostic laboratory. These 3 pairs of primers amplify 3 different fragments included in (i) a gene encoding a 31 kDa Brucella abortus antigen (B4/B5), (ii) a sequence 16S rRNA of B. abortus (F4/R2), and (iii) a gene encoding an outer membrane protein (omp-2) (JPF/JPR). Some modifications on the reported techniques were applied during the present work to improve the outcome. The results showed that the B4/B5 primer pair had the highest sensitivity for detection of positive samples (98%), the JPF/JPR primer pair detected 88.4% of positive samples, whereas F4/R2 primer pair was the least sensitive, being able to detect only 53.1% of positive samples. The specificity of the 3 techniques was 100%. The B4/B5 primer pair was also able to detect the smallest number of bacteria (700 cfu/mL), whereas JPF/JPR was able to detect 7 x 105 cfu/mL and F4/R2 was able to detect 7 x 107 cfu/mL. It is thus concluded that using the B4/B5 primer PCR with the suggested modifications is a robust assay, which meets the sensitivity requirements to be used for testing of human blood samples for brucellosis in the diagnostic laboratory.     

Rapid DNA extraction protocol from soil for polymerase chain reaction-mediated amplification

A simple and rapid method of DNA extraction from soil was developed and DNA was made suitable for subsequent efficient amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Key features of the extraction and purification were cold lysozyme- and SDS-assisted lysis with either freezing-thawing or bead beating, cold phenol extraction of the resulting soil suspension, CsCl and KAc precipitation and, finally, spermine-HCl or glass milk purification of DNA. Crude DNA preparations contained 4–20 μg DNA per g of soil extracted, and at least 50% of this was recovered in the final purified DNA preparations. The resulting DNA was pure enough to be restricted by various enzymes, and was amplifiable at concentrations of up to 20 ng of soil-derived DNA per 50 μl reaction mix.
Amplification of a 683 bp target sequence, pat, was performed with different Taq DNA polymerases. Application of the protocol enabled us to detect target DNA derived from roughly 10³ introduced Pseudomonas fluorescens (RP4 :: pat ) cfu per g of soil. The fate of an introduced population in the soil could be followed to this limit with PCR-assisted detection of target DNA. In addition, target DNA was detected in soil 5 months after release, when the introduced organism was no longer detectable on selective agar plates.
The extraction and purification protocol applied to various different soil types resulted in DNA of sufficient purity to permit amplification by PCR.     

Preparation of milk samples for PCR analysis using a rapid filtration technique

AIMS: To investigate the usefulness of a straightforward filtration method for the isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 contaminants from milk for PCR detection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Escherichia coli O157:H7 is grown in milk and enriched in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. Samples are filtered through a 0.45-microm pore membrane. The membrane is immersed in 200-microl lysis buffer and incubated at 95 degrees C for 10 min to release bacterial DNA for subsequent PCR detection. Under current conditions, the overall duration from filtration to PCR-ready DNA generation is <20 min, and the detection level for PCR was as low as 10 CFU of bacteria in 1 ml of milk. CONCLUSION: Bacterial contaminants of milk can be concentrated and isolated by a simple, one-step filtration and their DNA can be released for subsequent PCR detection by heating the filter membrane at 95 degrees C for 10 min. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The simplicity of this method allows inexpensive, high throughput automation that meets the demands of modern food hygiene monitoring.     

Rapid real-time PCR assay for detection and quantitation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis DNA in artificially contaminated milk

Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer technology and Lightcycler analysis, we developed a real-time PCR assay with primers and probes designed by using IS900 which allowed rapid detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis DNA in artificially contaminated milk. Initially, the PCR parameters (including primer and probe levels, assay volume, Mg(2+) concentration, and annealing temperature) were optimized. Subsequently, the quantitative ability of the assay was tested and was found to be accurate over a broad linear range (3 x 10(6) to 3 x 10(1) copies). The assay sensitivity when purified DNA was used was determined to be as low as five copies, with excellent reproducibility. A range of DNA isolation strategies was developed for isolating M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis DNA from spiked milk, the most effective of which involved the use of 50 mM Tris HCl, 10 mM EDTA, 2% Triton X-100, 4 M guanidinium isothiocyante, and 0.3 M sodium acetate combined with boiling, physical grinding, and nucleic acid spin columns. When this technique was used in conjunction with the real-time PCR assay, it was possible to consistently detect <100 organisms per ml of milk (equivalent to 2,000 organisms per 25 ml). Furthermore, the entire procedure (extraction and PCR) was performed in less than 3 h and was successfully adapted to quantify M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis in spiked milk from heavily and mildly contaminated samples.     

A comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese

Aims: In this study, we compare seven different methods which have been designed or modified to extract total DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese with a view to its subsequent use for the PCR of bacterial DNA. Materials and Results: Seven extraction methods were employed to extract total DNA from these foods, and their relative success with respect to the yield and purity of the DNA isolated, and its quality as a template for downstream PCR, was compared. Although all of the methods were successful with respect to the extraction of DNA naturally present in cheese, they varied in their relative ability to extract DNA from milk. However, when milk was spiked with a representative Gram‐positive (Listeria monocytogenes EGDe) or Gram‐negative (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2) bacterium, it was established that all methods successfully extracted DNA which was suitable for subsequent detection by PCR. Conclusions: Of the seven approaches, the PowerFood? Microbial DNA Isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.) was found to most consistently extract highly concentrated and pure DNA with a view to its subsequent use for PCR‐based amplification and also facilitated accurate detection by real‐time quantitative PCR. Significance and Impact of the Study: Accurately assessing the bacterial composition of milk and cheese is of great importance to the dairy industry. Increasingly, DNA‐based technologies are being employed to provide an accurate assessment of this microbiota. However, these approaches are dependent on our ability to extract DNA of sufficient yield and purity. This study compares a number of different options and highlights the relative success of these approaches. We also highlight the success of one method to extract DNA from different microbial populations as well as DNA which is suitable for real‐time PCR of microbes of interest, a challenge often encountered by the food industry.