The antinociceptive efficacy of buprenorphine administered through the drinking water of rats

Postoperative pain management in laboratory animals is important for animal welfare and required under law in many countries. Frequent injection of analgesics to rodents after surgery is stressful for the animals and labour-intensive for animal care personnel. An alternative dosing scheme such as administration of analgesics in the drinking water would be desirable. However, the efficacy of a chronic oral analgesic treatment via this route has not yet been documented. This study investigated the antinociceptive efficacy of buprenorphine administered ad libitum via the drinking water of laboratory rats. The antinociceptive efficacy of buprenorphine in drinking water was compared with repeated subcutaneous injections. A comparison was also made between buprenorphine in drinking water and the combination of one single subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine followed by buprenorphine in drinking water. Antinociception was assessed by use of an analgesiometric model measuring the rats' latency time to withdrawal from a noxious heat stimulus applied to the plantar surface of the paw. Results revealed that buprenorphine in drinking water (0.056 mg/mL) induced significant increases in paw withdrawal latency times during a three-day period of administration with a maximal effect at 39 h after the start of buprenorphine administration. One single injection of buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) followed by buprenorphine in the drinking water (0.056 mg/mL) induced an earlier onset of antinociception than buprenorphine in drinking water alone. In contrast, buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) injected every 8 h over a period of three days did not result in significant increases in paw withdrawal latency times. In conclusion, our results suggest that one single subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine followed by buprenorphine in drinking water may be a viable treatment option for the relief of pain in laboratory rats, but at the doses used in this study in pain-free rats it was associated with a decrease in water intake and some behavioural changes.     

Anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia following experimental surgery in laboratory rodents: are we making progress?

Current attitudes to the use of animals in biomedical research require that any pain or distress should be minimised. This can often be achieved by the use of appropriate anaesthetic and analgesic regimens. There, is however, little information on the peri-operative regimens used. A literature review was conducted to estimate how commonly analgesics are administered to laboratory rodents, the most widely used species of laboratory animals, and to assess the anaesthetic regimens employed. Studies describing potentially painful experimental procedures involving rodents were identified from peer-reviewed journals published from 1990 to 1992 and from 2000 to 2002. In papers published between 2000 and 2002, if analgesic administration was not specified, the institutional veterinary surgeons or authors of the papers were contacted by e-mail to obtain additional information on analgesic use. From 1992 to 2002, there was an increase in the reported prevalence of analgesic administration to laboratory rodents from 2.7% to 19.8%. Although the use of analgesics has increased over the past ten years, the overall level of post-operative pain relief for laboratory rodents is still low. Anaesthetic methodology changed markedly between the two time-periods sampled. Notably, there was an increase in the use of isoflurane and of injectable anaesthetic combinations such as ketamine/xylazine, whereas the use of ether and methoxyflurane decreased.     

Analgesic efficacy of orally administered buprenorphine in rats: methodologic considerations

Buprenorphine has been widely recommended for treatment of pain in rodents. We have previously documented that the recommended postoperative oral dose of buprenorphine in male Long-Evans rats, 0.5 mg/kg, is not as effective as the recommended parenteral dose of buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg, s.c.) as an analgesic. In the series of experiments reported here, we compared: the analgesic effect of buprenorphine when prepared in two ways in the laboratory with that of a commercially available injectable solution of buprenorphine; the analgesic effect of buprenorphine in Long-Evans rats with that in Sprague-Dawley rats; and Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley rats for development of pica, a commonly reported side effect of buprenorphine. We followed the pica experiment with assessment of the effectiveness of buprenorphine in establishing a conditioned flavor aversion. The results indicated that method of preparation did not result in any significant differences in the efficacy of injected buprenorphine. Strain of rat was not associated with a significant difference in the efficacy of buprenorphine. However, a significant strain difference was found in development of pica. Buprenorphine treatment was effective in inducing a conditioned flavor aversion. We concluded that the recommended oral dose of buprenorphine (0.5 mg/kg) is ineffective as an analgesic, and that this was not the result of method of preparation of the buprenorphine or strain of rat used. Furthermore, we concluded that buprenorphine treatment may induce gastrointestinal distress in both strains tested. The results reaffirm our previous conclusion that oral administration of buprenorphine at 0.5 mg/kg, despite the general recommendation, is not a reasonable treatment for postsurgical pain in rats.     

Transdermal fentanyl compared with parenteral buprenorphine in post-surgical pain in swine: a case study

The use of pigs as research animals in survival surgery has increased greatly in the last 15 years. Personnel conducting pig research have been hampered by a lack of proven long-acting analgesics for treatment of surgical pain of longer duration, and by a lack of reliable non-subjective parameters for the assessment of pain relief. The efficacy of the mixed opioid agonist-antagonist buprenorphine hydrochloride 0.10 mg/kg pr (n = 2) in the treatment of post-thoracotomy pain was compared with that of a transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) delivering 25 microg/h (n = 3) or 50 microg/h (n = 2) of the mu opioid agonist fentanyl hydrochloride. Food consumption, pain score, activity level and rate of movement were assessed under four conditions: normal pre-operative control (24h), pre-operative with analgesic alone (24h) and post-operative days 1, 2, 3 (72h). Serum concentration-time curves for fentanyl in clinical cases revealed that female Yorkshire cross pigs weighing 26.2+ 2.1 kg achieved serum values in the recognized human therapeutic range when treated with TTS fentanyl at 50 microg/h and experienced adequate pain control. Pigs treated with 25 microg/h TTS fentanyl had serum levels below the human analgesic range, experienced less adequate analgesia, and required supplemental analgesia in some cases. Based on existing pharmacokinetic data for fentanyl in pigs, the rate of uptake of TTS fentanyl when attached on inter-scapular skin was lower than predicted. Clinical pain scores and time intervals between each major postural change were not affected by analgesics in the absence of pain, but increased in all groups after surgery regardless of treatment. Food consumption was unaffected by analgesic treatment alone but decreased in all groups after surgery regardless of treatment. Analgesic effects on postoperative activity level were variable. TTS fentanyl at appropriate doses is a cost effective means of delivering basal analgesia following major surgery in pigs.     

The relief of pain in laboratory animals

The data concerning the types of analgesic drugs available and the experimental evidence for their efficacy in laboratory species are reviewed. The information is then extrapolated to the clinical situation to provide guidance as to methods of achieving effective analgesia in experimental animals. The most generally useful agent at present seems to be buprenorphine which can be used to provide effective, long lasting analgesia in a wide range of species.     

Differences in response to anaesthetics and analgesics between inbred rat strains

Differences in response to analgesic and anaesthetic drugs can partly be attributed to variations in the genetic background of experimental animals. This study was carried out to determine differences in the response of inbred rat strains to a selection of analgesics and drugs used in anaesthetic protocols. A cross between the most contrasting strains can then be phenotyped in future studies in order to localize quantitative trait loci (QTLs) involved in analgesic/anaesthetic drug sensitivity. Eight inbred strains (n = 6 rats/strain) were selected for the study: the pigmented ACI, BN and COP strains and the albino F344, LEW, SHR, WAG and WKY strains. Each rat was injected intravenously with two analgesics (buprenorphine 0.05 mg/kg and nalbuphine 1 mg/kg) and three drugs used in anaesthetic protocols (propofol 25 mg/kg, medetomidine 50 microg/kg and ketamine 10 mg/kg), respectively, using a crossover design. Analgesic responses were assessed using an analgesiometric procedure. The sleep time of the rat and, where applicable, the interval between injection and loss of righting reflex were used to determine the anaesthetic response. Six out of eight strains responded significantly different from each other to the analgesic effect of buprenorphine with the ACI strain as hyper-responder. The tail withdrawal latency at 55 degrees C of the F344 and WKY rats using buprenorphine was not significantly different from baseline tail withdrawal latencies. In this study, all strains were non-responsive to the analgesic effects of nalbuphine. The response to all three drugs used in anaesthetic protocols differed significantly among the strains. The F344 and BN strains were relatively resistant to the sedative effects of medetomidine. Use of ketamine was abandoned in the ACI and BN strains when the first two animals of both strains died soon after induction. With all three drugs the sleep time of albino rats was significantly longer compared with that of the pigmented ones. We conclude that the results from this study can be used in future studies where QTLs for the sensitivity to anaesthetic/analgesic drugs are localized.     

Traumeel S® for pain relief following hallux valgus surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Background

In spite of recent advances in post-operative pain relief, pain following orthopedic surgery remains an ongoing challenge for clinicians. We examined whether a well known and frequently prescribed homeopathic preparation could mitigate post-operative pain.

Method

We performed a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of the homeopathic preparation Traumeel S^® in minimizing post-operative pain and analgesic consumption following surgical correction of hallux valgus. Eighty consecutive patients were randomized to receive either Traumeel tablets or an indistinguishable placebo, and took primary and rescue oral analgesics as needed. Maximum numerical pain scores at rest and consumption of oral analgesics were recorded on day of surgery and for 13 days following surgery.

Results

Traumeel was not found superior to placebo in minimizing pain or analgesic consumption over the 14 days of the trial, however a transient reduction in the daily maximum post-operative pain score favoring the Traumeel arm was observed on the day of surgery, a finding supported by a treatment-time interaction test (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Traumeel was not superior to placebo in minimizing pain or analgesic consumption over the 14 days of the trial. A transient reduction in the daily maximum post-operative pain score on the day of surgery is of questionable clinical importance.

Trial Registration

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. # NCT00279513     

Are repeated doses of buprenorphine detrimental to postoperative recovery after laparotomy in rats?

Buprenorphine is a widely used analgesic for relief of postoperative pain in rats. The effect of repeated doses of buprenorphine throughout the postoperative pain and stress response is unknown. This investigation tested the hypotheses that (a) daily analgesic doses of buprenorphine for 7 d ameliorate the stress response after laparotomy in rats and (b) preoperative buprenorphine better ameliorates the response than do peri- and postoperative administration. Postoperative effects on body weight, daily food and water consumption, and daily fecal and urinary outputs were monitored in groups of rats treated for 7 d with analgesic doses of buprenorphine initiated at different time points relative to the time of laparotomy. Analgesic doses of buprenorphine had no effect on the study parameters in healthy unoperated rats. Daily injection of buprenorphine delayed the time at which the preoperative body weight was restored without decreasing the postoperative changes in daily food consumption, water intake, and fecal and urinary outputs in the operated rats. The effects of daily analgesic doses of buprenorphine for 7 d on body weight, daily food, and water consumption, and fecal and urinary outputs were minimal and less statistically significant than the changes caused by surgery itself. However, this dosing regimen seems to delay the restoration of body weight after abdominal surgery in rats.     

Effects of buprenorphine on body temperature, locomotor activity and cardiovascular function when assessed by telemetric monitoring in rats

Buprenorphine is a potent analgesic commonly used clinically in humans and rodents experiencing severe pain. However, effects of therapeutic doses on locomotor activity and the cardiovascular system have not been studied in conscious animals. The effects of buprenorphine were therefore evaluated in this study using telemetric monitoring in conscious animals. Telemetry transmitters were implanted in the peritoneal cavity of Wistar rats with a pressure catheter in the aorta and electrodes for electrocardiogram (ECG) recording subcutaneously. After a single subcutaneous administration of saline, each rat was administered single subcutaneous doses of 0.006, 0.03 or 0.15 mg/kg body weight (bw) of buprenorphine. During a 10 h period after administration, buprenorphine induced a varying dose-dependent increase in body temperature, heart rate, dP/dt and systolic-diastolic blood pressure, as well as a corresponding decrease in QT time. At high dose, however, QT time was still decreased 24 h post-administration, but no arrhythmias or visual changes were observed in the ECG complex. Body temperature and heart rate increased at the high dose of buprenorphine, even at 20-24 h after administration. Moreover, the high dose of buprenorphine induced a biphasic response in diastolic blood pressure, with an early and pronounced increase that, at 14 h after administration, reversed to a decrease, failing to normalize within 24 h post-dosage. The results indicate that buprenorphine induces long-lasting effects (such as body temperature and cardiovascular effects) in the rat after a single subcutaneous dose at 0.15 mg/kg bw.     

The effect of buprenorphine on the course of disease in laboratory rabbits infected with myxoma virus

The only method of assessing the virulence of myxoma virus is to record survival times of rabbits inoculated with the virus. This raises ethical concerns about using animals in experiments where death is the end point. We investigated whether or not the opioid analgesic buprenorphine could be used in rabbits without compromising the myxoma virus virulence assay and on the presumption that animals may suffer pain during the course of the disease. Thirty, 5-month-old New Zealand White rabbits were divided into two groups stratified for weight and gender, and inoculated intradermally with 100 pfu of the Standard Laboratory Strain (SLS) of myxoma virus. At day 6 post infection (p.i.), when eyelid swelling was first seen, each animal in one group was treated with 0.03 mg/kg buprenorphine, subcutaneously, morning and evening until death. Animals in the other group were untreated. Animals were weighed daily and rectal temperatures taken morning and evening. Intake of food and water was assessed as was general demeanor including respiratory effort. There was no significant difference in mean survival time, weight change, or demeanor between the two groups. Increased respiratory effort was seen from day 10 p.i. in animals surviving up to and beyond that time but again there was no difference between groups. Animals treated with buprenorphine refused food and water a day earlier than untreated animals, and had lower temperatures immediately prior to death. It was concluded that the opiate analgesic buprenorphine can be used without compromising the current virulence assay for the SLS of myxoma virus in New Zealand White rabbits but that the clinical signs of myxomatosis that could be attributed to pain were not abrogated.     

Effects of buprenorphine on immunogenicity and protective efficacy in the guinea pig keratoconjunctivitis model (Sereny test)

Shigellosis is a disease of global proportions, with an estimated 164.7 million episodes annually throughout the world as well as an estimated 1.1 million associated mortalities in developing countries. Due to increasing incidence, and continued emergence of multi-drug resistant strains, Shigella vaccine development is considered a top public health priority. The guinea pig keratoconjunctivitis model, the basis for the Sereny test, remains the most reliable in vivo indicator of virulence of Shigella strains and immunogenicity and protective efficacy of Shigella vaccine candidates. The model is effective in evaluating the ability of Shigella strains to invade the corneal epithelia of guinea pigs and spread to contiguous cells, with the more virulent strains causing ulcerative keratoconjunctivitis. However, analgesia is not routinely used to relieve this painful condition because of potential immunomodulation and confounding of experimental results. The objective of the study reported here was to evaluate use of buprenorphine hydrochloride as an analgesic during the Sereny test. Local and systemic immune responses were measured in guinea pigs given buprenorphine versus those responses in controls. Results of this study suggest that buprenorphine, administered at an analgesic dose of 0.05 mg/kg of body weight twice daily, can be successfully used with the model without significantly affecting immunologic evaluation of Shigella vaccine candidates. However, in buprenorphine-treated animals, there was a significant increase in the amount of mucopurulent ocular discharge, requiring frequent cleaning of the affected eyes. Additionally, animals treated with buprenorphine had significant reduction in body weight, in comparison with saline controls.     

Assessment of Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia and Analgesic Tolerance in Mice Using Thermal and Mechanical Nociceptive Modalities

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance severely impact the clinical efficacy of opiates as pain relievers in animals and humans. The molecular mechanisms underlying both phenomena are not well understood and their elucidation should benefit from the study of animal models and from the design of appropriate experimental protocols. We describe here a methodological approach for inducing, recording and quantifying morphine-induced hyperalgesia as well as for evidencing analgesic tolerance, using the tail-immersion and tail pressure tests in wild-type mice. As shown in the video, the protocol is divided into five sequential steps. Handling and habituation phases allow a safe determination of the basal nociceptive response of the animals. Chronic morphine administration induces significant hyperalgesia as shown by an increase in both thermal and mechanical sensitivity, whereas the comparison of analgesia time-courses after acute or repeated morphine treatment clearly indicates the development of tolerance manifested by a decline in analgesic response amplitude. This protocol may be similarly adapted to genetically modified mice in order to evaluate the role of individual genes in the modulation of nociception and morphine analgesia. It also provides a model system to investigate the effectiveness of potential therapeutic agents to improve opiate analgesic efficacy.     

An analgesiometry system for use in rabbits with some preliminary data on the effects of buprenorphine and lofentanil

A low cost infrared skin heating system has been designed to measure the efficacy of analgesics in rabbits. Following construction of a prototype, it was used to assess the effect of buprenorphine given subcutaneously and per rectum. Buprenorphine administered subcutaneously has a rapid onset of action, but its duration (8-10 h) appears slightly shorter than has been suggested previously; rectal administration appears to prolong its effect. Preliminary data show that lofentanil has a longer duration of action than buprenorphine and it may prove, therefore, to be a valuable long-acting analgesic in the rabbit.     

Evaluation of Buprenorphine in a Postoperative Pain Model in Rats

We evaluated the commonly prescribed analgesic buprenorphine in a postoperative pain model in rats, assessing acute postoperative pain relief, rebound hyperalgesia, and the long-term effects of postoperative opioid treatment on subsequent opioid exposure. Rats received surgery (paw incision under isoflurane anesthesia), sham surgery (anesthesia only), or neither and were treated postoperatively with 1 of several doses of subcutaneous buprenorphine. Pain sensitivity to noxious and nonnoxious mechanical stimuli at the site of injury (primary pain) was assessed at 1, 4, 24, and 72 h after surgery. Pain sensitivity at a site distal to the injury (secondary pain) was assessed at 24 and 72 h after surgery. Rats were tested for their sensitivity to the analgesic and locomotor effects of morphine 9 to 10 d after surgery. Buprenorphine at 0.05 mg/kg SC was determined to be the most effective; this dose induced isoalgesia during the acute postoperative period and the longest period of pain relief, and it did not induce long-term changes in opioid sensitivity in 2 functional measures of the opioid system. A lower dose of buprenorphine (0.01 mg/kg SC) did not meet the criterion for isoalgesia, and a higher dose (0.1 mg/kg SC) was less effective in pain relief at later recovery periods and induced a long-lasting opioid tolerance, indicating greater neural adaptations. These results support the use of 0.05 mg/kg SC buprenorphine as the upper dose limit for effective treatment of postoperative pain in rats and suggest that higher doses produce long-term effects on opioid sensitivity.Relief of postoperative pain is mandated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Animals¹⁸ and the Public Health Service Policy¹⁷ and is a major objective of laboratory animal medicine. Buprenorphine is one of the most commonly used opioid analgesics for postoperative pain in laboratory animals, mainly because of its long duration of action.¹⁰ The typical recommended dose range of buprenorphine in rats is 0.02 to 0.05 mg/kg SC.¹⁰ The upper end of this range, although effective at relieving acute postoperative pain in rats, is associated with side effects such as enhanced postoperative pain after the drug has worn off (rebound hyperalgesia),²³ respiratory depression,²¹ nausea or gastrointestinal distress and pica,²⁵ and neural adaptations (for example, sensitization) that may lead to long-term changes in neural function in the central nervous system and consequent changes in behavior.¹⁴ Central sensitization is a well-studied neural adaptation expressed in the brain and spinal cord and induced by nociceptive stimulation (that is, pain-induced by surgical manipulation) that manifests as hyperalgesia (decreased pain threshold to noxious stimuli) and allodynia (appearance of pain-like responses to nonnoxious tactile stimuli) during the recovery period.^16,29 Central sensitization contributes to persistent pain during the postoperative recovery period (that is, maintenance of increased pain sensitivity during tissue recovery) and chronic pain in some pathologic conditions (that is, persistent pain sensitivity after full tissue recovery). Central sensitization also accounts for the spread of hyperalgesia and allodynia to noninjured areas of the body distal to the injury.³¹ This phenomenon is referred to as ‘secondary pain’ (secondary hyperalgesia and allodynia), because it is not directly associated with the primary injury site.Opioid analgesics inhibit pain by acting on the nervous system to block transduction of pain signals traveling in sensory neurons toward the central nervous system and by facilitating activity of the descending pain inhibition neural pathway.¹⁶ Opioid analgesics also induce neural adaptations in the nervous system, phenomena that underlie the pronounced changes in behavior associated with addiction to narcotics.² Notably, opioid analgesics have been shown to enhance central sensitization initiated by pain transmission.^6,8,14,20 This property means that opiate analgesics facilitate both the inhibition of pain and central sensitization that leads to the enhancement of pain. Because central sensitization is a neural adaptation, the interaction of opiates on this pain mechanism outlasts the presence of the drug; in contrast, opiate effects on pain inhibition are limited to the presence of the drug. This arrangement is thought to account for rebound pain, that is, increased pain sensitivity after the opiate analgesic has worn off. Opiate side effects can compromise the success of recovery by increasing the level of distress experienced during recovery (for example, inducing nausea) and possibly increasing the duration of distress during recovery (for example, allowing for rebound pain). Moreover, and of importance specifically to laboratory animal medicine, the general neural adaptations induced by even a single dose of an opiate analgesic²⁶ may induce changes in the nervous system that alter and therefore compromise the validity of the animal model under study (for example, opioid mechanisms involved in behavioral control).We previously evaluated the feasibility of oral administration of buprenorphine.^15,25 As a basis for comparison, we used the ‘gold-standard’ postoperative buprenorphine dose of 0.05 mg/kg SC. The results of those studies showed that oral administration of buprenorphine was not feasible because the dose necessary to produce analgesia comparable to the standard dose of 0.05 mg/kg SC was 10 times the oral dose recommended in the literature and because the resulting concentration of oral buprenorphine was too bitter for rats to ingest voluntarily in a volume of flavored foodstuff that they could eat in a single meal.^15,25 We also observed that both subcutaneous and oral buprenorphine caused conditioned aversion to flavors,²⁵ suggestive of gastrointestinal distress⁵, with a greater effect for the oral route. Our conclusions and the associated clinical recommendation were limited by our presumption that buprenorphine at 0.05 mg/kg SC was the ideal postsurgical dose.An assessment of the literature that established this dose identified 2 problems. First, little or no research had directly assessed the effect of buprenorphine on pain sensitivity in animals in the hyperalgesic state that characterized the postoperative period,²³ and to our knowledge, no study has directly assessed the dose–response function of postsurgical buprenorphine on hyperalgesia. We hypothesized that endogenous opioids activated during the postoperative period²⁴ might act synergistically with buprenorphine to allow adequate relief of postoperative pain with a lower dose of buprenorphine than is necessary in an algesiometric test, thereby making predictions and extrapolations from algesiometric tests inaccurate. Second, we found that little consideration had been given to the consequences of other physiologic effects of buprenorphine on the recovery process (for example, gastrointestinal distress⁵, rebound hyperalgesia, and allodynia). As stated earlier, recent research on central sensitization has determined that although opioid analgesics inhibit pain sensation acutely, they also enhance neural adaptations that account for rebound pain and other long-term chronic pain conditions.^16,28,29,31 We hypothesized secondarily that a lower dose of buprenorphine, if effective acutely, would result in reduced side effects and be less likely to initiate or enhance neural adaptations, such as rebound hyperalgesia and allodynia.The current study had 2 goals. The first was to establish the minimum dose of buprenorphine needed to relieve acute postoperative pain effectively in rats. As a starting point, we defined effective relief of acute pain as the induction of isoalgesia during the postoperative period; isoalgesia is the normal level of pain sensation, in contrast to analgesia (absence of pain sensation) or hypoalgesia (lower-than-normal pain sensation). The second goal was to evaluate the effect of postoperative buprenorphine on factors that slow recovery (that is, rebound hyperalgesia and allodynia) or create long-term changes (that is, sensitization or tolerance to opiates). We tested our hypothesis by using various doses of buprenorphine in a rat model of incisional pain.^3,4,31 This model was selected because it induces cutaneous and muscular pain common to most surgery and generates mild to moderate persistent pain so that both the acute inhibitory effects of the buprenorphine (that is, pain relief) and the lasting effects of buprenorphine (that is, rebound hyperalgesia) could be studied.     

Analgesic efficacy and safety of paracetamol-codeine combinations versus paracetamol alone: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES--To assess whether adding codeine to paracetamol has an additive analgesic effect; to assess the safety of paracetamol-codeine combinations versus paracetamol alone. DESIGN--Systematic literature review with meta-analysis, methodological quality of published trials being scored by means of 13 predefined criteria. TRIALS--24 of 29 trials that met the inclusion criteria. Models studied in the trials were postsurgical pain (21), postpartum pain (one), osteoarthritic pain (one), and experimentally induced pain (one). INTERVENTIONS--Dosages ranged from 400 to 1000 mg paracetamol and 10 to 60 mg codeine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--The sum pain intensity difference (efficacy analysis) and the proportion of patients reporting a side effect (safety analysis). RESULTS--Most trials were considered of good to very good quality. Only the single dose studies could be combined for analysis of analgesic efficacy. Pooled efficacy results indicated that codeine added to paracetamol provided a 5% increase in analgesia on the sum pain intensity difference. This effect was comparable to the difference in analgesic effect between codeine and placebo. The cumulative incidence of side effects with each treatment was comparable in the single dose trials. In the multidose studies a significantly higher proportion of side effects occurred with paracetamol-codeine preparations. CONCLUSION--The difference is analgesic effect between paracetamol-codeine combinations and paracetamol alone was small but statistically significant. In the multidose studies the proportion of patients reporting a side effect was significantly higher with paracetamol-codeine combinations. For occasional pain relief a paracetamol-codeine combination might be appropriate but repeated use increases the occurrence of side effects.     

The Conditioned Place Preference Test for Assessing Welfare Consequences and Potential Refinements in a Mouse Bladder Cancer Model

Most pre-clinical analgesic efficacy assays still involve nociceptive testing in rodents. This is despite concerns as to the relevance of these tests for evaluating the pain-preventative properties of drugs. More appropriate methods would target pain rather than nociception, but these are currently not available, so it remains unknown whether animal pain equates to the negatively affective and subjective/emotional state it causes in humans. Mouse cancer models are common despite the likelihood of substantial pain. We used Conditioned Place Preference (CPP) testing, assessments of thermal hyperalgesia and behaviour to determine the likelihood that MBT-2 bladder cancer impacts negatively on mouse welfare, such as by causing pain. There was no CPP to saline, but morphine preference in tumour bearing mice exceeded that seen in tumour-free controls. This occurred up to 10 days before the study end-point alongside reduced body weight, development of hyperalgesia and behaviour changes. These effects indicated mice experienced a negative welfare state caused by malaise (if not pain) before euthanasia. Due to the complexity of the assessments needed to demonstrate this, it is unlikely that this approach could be used for routine welfare assessment on a study-by-study basis. However, our results show mice in sufficiently similar studies are likely to benefit from more intensive severity assessment and re-evaluation of end-points with a view to implementing appropriate refinements. In this particular case, a refinement would have been to have euthanased mice at least 7 days earlier or possibly by provision of end-stage pain relief. CPP testing was found to be a helpful method to investigate the responses of mice to analgesics, possibly on a subjective level. These findings and those of other recent studies show it could be a valuable method of screening candidate analgesics for efficacy against cancer pain and possibly other pain or disease models.     

Influence of early neonatal experience on nociceptive responses and analgesic effects in rats

Early maternal separation has profound effects on nociception in rats. Cross-fostering is a standard husbandry procedure used by some commercial breeders. This study aimed to determine if cross-fostering altered nociception and the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine and morphine. At seven and nine weeks of age, an elevated plus maze was used to assess anxiety and Hargreaves apparatus was used to measure thermal nociception at two intensities in cross-fostered and naturally-reared rats. At 10 weeks of age these rats were assigned to one of three treatment groups: saline, buprenorphine or morphine. The Hargreaves apparatus was used to evaluate the effect of analgesics on nociception. Differences were observed in nociception between the cross-fostered and naturally-reared rats at both intensities. At the lower intensity no significant differences were seen between the cross-fostered and naturally-reared rats post-administration of an analgesic. At the higher intensity significant differences were apparent. Morphine was less effective in inducing analgesia to thermal stimuli in cross-fostered rats compared with naturally-reared rats, whereas the opposite was found with buprenorphine which had a more pronounced analgesic effect in the cross-fostered rats. No significant differences in performance on an elevated plus maze were demonstrated between the cross-fostered and naturally-reared rats.     

Influence of buprenorphine analgesia on post-operative recovery in two strains of rats.

The objective of this study was to establish an effective post-operative analgesic regimen for Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Dark Agouti (DA) rats. Buprenorphine (0.01 or 0.05 mg/kg), a partial mu opioid agonist, was administered subcutaneously immediately on completion of a standardized surgical procedure, involving anaesthesia, laparotomy and visceral manipulation. Two of the four treatment groups and the saline control group received a second injection 9 h later. Behavioural observations by three independent observers provided no information in assessing pain in this model. All rats lost weight, consumed less food and water after surgery. On the first day, both SD and DA rats receiving buprenorphine lost less weight than untreated control groups. Using weight loss as an efficacy criterion, low-dose buprenorphine, given once or twice, provided effective analgesia in SD rats. A higher single dose provided no additional benefit and a second dose was detrimental, reducing body weight and food intake. In DA rats, the high dose, given twice, appeared to be more effective than the lower dose. All DA cage cohorts consumed < 10% pre-operative food despite buprenorphine treatment, suggesting a higher dosage may be necessary. However, all SD and 80% DA rats who received no buprenorphine gained body weight on the second day, whereas most of the buprenorphine-treated rats continued to lose weight for another 2 days, despite increased food consumption by both strains. Buprenorphine may adversely affect intestinal function over a number of days due to its enterohepatic circulation; this effect may be more severe in DA rats. Adverse metabolic effects of buprenorphine and other opioids may preclude their use in the future if it can be shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) provide equally effective analgesia.     

Psychometric Assessment of the Rat Grimace Scale and Development of an Analgesic Intervention Score

Our limited ability to assess spontaneous pain in rodent models of painful human conditions may be associated with a translational failure of promising analgesic compounds in to clinical use. If measurement of spontaneous pain behaviours can be used to generate an analgesic intervention score their use could expand to guide the use of analgesics, as mandated by regulatory bodies and ethical and welfare obligations. One such measure of spontaneous pain, the Rat Grimace Scale (RGS), has recently been described and shown to exhibit reliability. However, reliability of measurement scores is context and content specific, and further testing required to assess translation to a heterogenous setting (different model, raters, environment). The objectives of this study were to perform reliability testing with the Rat Grimace Scale in a heterogenous setting and generate an analgesic intervention score for its use. In a randomised, blinded study, sixteen adult female rats received one of three analgesia treatments (0.05 mg/kg buprenorphine subcutaneously, 1 mg/kg meloxicam subcutaneously, 0.2 mg/kg oral buprenorphine in jelly) peri-operatively (telemetry unit implantation surgery). Rats were video-recorded (before, 1–6 and 12 hours post-operatively) and images collected for independent scoring by three blinded raters using the RGS, and five experts based on “pain/no pain” assessment. Scores were used to calculate inter- and intra-rater reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient and generate an analgesic intervention score with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The RGS scores showed very good inter- and intra-rater reliability (0.85 [0.78–0.90 95% CI] and 0.83 [0.76–0.89], respectively). An analgesic intervention threshold of greater than 0.67 was determined. These data demonstrate that the RGS is a useful tool which can be successfully employed in a heterogenous setting, and has the potential to guide analgesic intervention.     

Comparative effect of intraoperative propacetamol versus placebo on morphine consumption after elective reduction mammoplasty under remifentanil-based anesthesia: a randomized control trial [ISRCTN71723173]

BACKGROUND: Postoperative administration of paracetamol or its prodrug propacetamol has been shown to decrease pain with a morphine sparing effect. However, the effect of propacetamol administered intra-operatively on post-operative pain and early postoperative morphine consumption has not been clearly evaluated. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of analgesic protocols in the management of post-operative pain, a standardized anesthesia protocol without long-acting opioids is crucial. Thus, for ethical reasons, the surgical procedure under general anesthesia with remifentanil as the only intraoperative analgesic must be associated with a moderate predictable postoperative pain. METHODS: We were interested in determining the postoperative effect of propacetamol administered intraoperatively after intraoperative remifentanil. Thirty-six adult women undergoing mammoplasty with remifentanil-based anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive propacetamol 2 g or placebo one hour before the end of surgery. After remifentanil interruption and tracheal extubation in recovery room, pain was assessed and intravenous titrated morphine was given. The primary end-point was the cumulative dose of morphine administered in the recovery room. The secondary end-points were the pain score after tracheal extubation and one hour after, the delay for obtaining a Simplified Numerical Pain Scale (SNPS) less than 4, and the incidence of morphine side effects in the recovery room.For intergroup comparisons, categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test and continuous variables were compared using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. A p value less than 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: In recovery room, morphine consumption was lower in the propacetamol group than in the placebo group (p = 0.01). Pain scores were similar in both groups after tracheal extubation and lower in the propacetamol group (p = 0.003) one hour after tracheal extubation. The time to reach a SNPS < 4 was significantly shorter in the propacetamol group (p = 0.02). The incidence of morphine related side effects did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative propacetamol administration with remifentanil based-anesthesia improved significantly early postoperative pain by sparing morphine and shortening the delay to achieve pain relief.