Interaction of proteins located at a distance along DNA: mechanism of target immunity in the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction

DNA molecules carrying a Mu end(s) are inefficient targets in the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction. This target immunity is due to preferential dissociation of Mu B protein from DNA molecules that have Mu A protein bound to the Mu end; free DNA is a much poorer target than DNA with Mu B protein bound. We show that Mu B protein, which binds nonspecifically to DNA, is immobile once bound. An encounter between Mu A and Mu B proteins, bound some distance apart along DNA, is necessary to facilitate the Mu B dissociation. Experiments which show that DNA without a Mu end can acquire immunity, by catenation to DNA with a Mu end(s), are consistent with a model of Mu A-Mu B interaction by DNA looping, but not by linear movement of protein(s) along DNA.     

Steady-state kinetic analysis of ATP hydrolysis by the B protein of bacteriophage mu. Involvement of protein oligomerization in the ATPase cycle

The DNA strand-transfer reaction of bacteriophage Mu requires Mu B protein and ATP for high efficiency. These factors facilitate the capture of target DNA by the donor protein-DNA complex. To understand the mechanism of the Mu B ATPase cycle in the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction, we undertook a steady-state kinetic analysis of Mu B ATPase. The results reveal complex properties of the ATPase activity; Mu B protein oligomerizes in the presence of ATP, and ATP hydrolysis by the Mu B ATPase is stimulated by the protein oligomerization and shows a positive cooperativity with respect to ATP concentration. Mu B ATPase activity is also modulated by DNA and Mu A protein. DNA alone suppresses the catalytic activity of Mu B ATPase, whereas DNA enhances the apparent binding affinity for ATP. In the presence of Mu A protein together with DNA, however, the catalytic activity is greatly stimulated. Based on these results, we propose a working hypothesis in which oligomerization of Mu B protein plays a key role in its ATPase cycle.     

Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation

Phage Mu transposition is initiated by the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction, which generates a branched DNA structure that acts as a transposition intermediate. A critical step in this reaction is formation of a special synaptic DNA-protein complex called a plectosome. We find that formation of this complex involves, in addition to a pair of Mu end sequences, a third cis-acting sequence element, the internal activation sequence (IAS). The IAS is specifically recognized by the N-terminal domain of Mu transposase (MuA protein). Neither the N-terminal domain of MuA protein nor the IAS is required for later reaction steps. The IAS overlaps with the sequences to which Mu repressor protein binds in the Mu operator region; the Mu repressor directly inhibits the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction by interfering with the interaction between MuA protein and the IAS, providing an additional mode of regulation by the repressor.     

Stimulation of the Mu DNA strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions by the Mu B protein is independent of stable binding of the Mu B protein to DNA.

Interactions between the Mu A and Mu B proteins are important in the early steps of the in vitro transposition of a mini-Mu plasmid. We have examined these interactions by assaying Mu B stimulation of Mu A-mediated strand cleavage and strand transfer reactions. We have previously shown that in the presence of ATP the Mu B protein can stimulate the Mu A-directed cleavage reaction of mini-Mu plasmids carrying a terminal base pair mutation (Surette, M.G., Harkness, T., and Chaconas, G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3118-3124). Here we demonstrate that in the absence of a non-Mu DNA target molecule the Mu B protein stimulates intramolecular integration of a mini-Mu in an ATP-dependent fashion. Furthermore, modification of the Mu B protein with N-ethylmaleimide severely compromises the ability of B to form a stable complex with DNA; however, the modified protein stimulates the strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions as efficiently as the untreated protein. These results indicate that the Mu B protein is capable of stimulating the Mu A protein through direct interaction in the absence of stable Mu B-DNA complex formation. Our results increase the spectrum of Mu B protein activities and uncouple the stimulatory properties of the Mu B protein from stable DNA binding but not the ATP cofactor requirement.     

Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu

Transposition of Mu involves transfer of the 3' ends of Mu DNA to the 5' ends of a staggered cut in the target DNA. We find that cleavage at the 3' ends of Mu DNA precedes cutting of the target DNA. The resulting nicked species exists as a noncovalent nucleoprotein complex in which the two Mu ends are held together. This cleaved donor complex completes strand transfer when a target DNA, Mu B protein, and ATP are provided. Mu end DNA sequences that have been precisely cut at their 3' ends by a restriction endonuclease, instead of by Mu A protein and HU, are efficiently transferred to a target DNA upon subsequent incubation with Mu A protein, Mu B protein, and ATP. Cleavage of the Mu ends therefore cannot be energetically coupled with joining these ends to a target DNA. We discuss the DNA strand transfer mechanism in view of these results, and propose a model involving direct transfer of the 5' ends of the cut target DNA, from their original partners, to the 3' ends of Mu.     

Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA

We report that two types of stable protein-DNA complexes, or transpososomes, are generated in vitro during the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction. The Type 1 complex is an intermediate in the reaction. Its formation requires a supercoiled mini-Mu donor plasmid, Mu A and HU protein, and Mg2+. In the Type 1 complex the two ends of Mu are held together, creating a figure eight-shaped molecule with two independent topological domains; the Mu sequences remain supercoiled while the vector DNA is relaxed because of nicking. In the presence of Mu B protein, ATP, target DNA, and Mg2+, the Type 1 complex is converted into the protein-associated product of the strand transfer reaction. In this Type 2 complex, the target DNA has been joined to the Mu DNA ends held in the synaptic complex at the center of the figure eight. Supercoils are not required for the latter reaction.     

Effect of mutations in the C-terminal domain of Mu B on DNA binding and interactions with Mu A transposase

Bacteriophage Mu transposition requires two phage-encoded proteins, the transposase, Mu A, and an accessory protein, Mu B. Mu B is an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein that is required for target capture and target immunity and is an allosteric activator of transpososome function. The recent NMR structure of the C-terminal domain of Mu B (Mu B223-312) revealed that there is a patch of positively charged residues on the solvent-exposed surface. This patch may be responsible for the nonspecific DNA binding activity displayed by the purified Mu B223-312 peptide. We show that mutations of three lysine residues within this patch completely abolish nonspecific DNA binding of the C-terminal peptide (Mu B223- 312). To determine how this DNA binding activity affects transposition we mutated these lysine residues in the full-length protein. The full-length protein carrying all three mutations was deficient in both strand transfer and allosteric activation of transpososome function but retained ATPase activity. Peptide binding studies also revealed that this patch of basic residues within the C-terminal domain of Mu B is within a region of the protein that interacts directly with Mu A. Thus, we conclude that this protein segment contributes to both DNA binding and protein-protein contacts with the Mu transposase.     

Two mutations of phage mu transposase that affect strand transfer or interactions with B protein lie in distinct polypeptide domains.

Two mutations within the transposase (the A protein) gene of phage Mu with distinct effects on DNA transposition have been studied. The first mutation maps to the central domain (domain II) of A, a protein consisting of three major structural domains. The variant protein is normal in synapsis and cleavage of Mu ends but is temperature-sensitive in the strand transfer reaction, joining the Mu ends to target DNA. The second mutation is a deletion at the C terminus (within domain III); on the basis of genetic studies, the mutant protein is predicted to have lost the ability to interact with the Mu B protein. The B protein, in conjunction with A, promotes efficient intermolecular transposition, while inhibiting intramolecular transposition. We show that the purified mutant protein is proficient in intramolecular, but not intermolecular transposition in vitro. The interactions between A and B proteins have been followed by a proteolysis assay. The chymotrypsin sensitivity of the interdomainal Phe221-Ser222 peptide bond within the bidomainally organized B protein is exquisitely modulated by ATP, DNA and A protein. The sensitive or "open" state of this bond in native B protein becomes partially "open" upon binding of ATP by B, attains a "closed" or resistant configuration upon binding of DNA in presence of ATP, and is rendered "open" again upon addition of the A protein. In this test for the interaction of A protein with B protein-DNA complex, the domain II mutant behaves like wild-type A protein. However, the domain III mutant fails to restore chymotrypsin susceptibility of the Phe221-Ser222 bond.     

Mechanism of Mu DNA transposition

The study of Mu DNA transposition in vitro has resulted in a much better understanding of the biochemical details of the transposition process. An early step in transposition is the generation of a 5th structure which is the product of the strand-tansfer reaction. The polarity of the strand transfer has been determined and substantial progress has been made on the role of the individual proteins. Moreover, the strand-transfer reaction is mediated by stable protein–DNA complexes, or transposomes, and the reaction can be divided into two sequential steps. The role of the transposomes and the requirement for a supercoiled Mu DNA substrate are also discussed.     

DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition.

Initial events in Mu DNA transposition involve specific recognition of Mu DNA ends (att sites) and an internal enhancer site by the Mu transposase (A protein). This interaction between A protein and Mu DNA sequences present on a supercoiled DNA substrate leads to the formation of a stable synaptic complex in which the att ends are nicked, prior to DNA strand transfer. This study examines the properties of a synaptic complex proficient for DNA transposition. We show that the A protein binds as a monomer to its binding sites, and causes the DNA to bend through approximately 90 degrees at each site. All six att binding sites (three at each Mu end) are occupied by A within the synaptic complex. Three of these sites are loosely held and can be emptied of A upon challenge with heparin. A synaptic complex with only three sites occupied is stable and is fully competent in the subsequent strand-transfer step of transposition.     

Immunoelectron microscopic analysis of the A, B, and HU protein content of bacteriophage Mu transpososomes

Stable protein-DNA complexes or transpososomes mediate the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction in vitro (Surette, M. G., Buch, S. J., and Chaconas, G. (1987) Cell 49, 253-262; Craigie, R., and Mizuuchi, K. (1987) Cell 51, 493-501). Formation of the Type 1 complex, an intermediate in the strand transfer reaction, requires the Mu A and Escherichia coli HU proteins. Generation of the Type 2 complex, in which the Mu ends have been covalently linked to the target DNA, requires the Mu B protein, ATP, and target DNA in addition to A and HU. The protein content of these higher order synaptic complexes has been studied by immunoelectron microscopy using protein A-colloidal gold conjugates to visualize antibody-bound complexes. Under our in vitro transposition conditions, Type 1 complexes were found to contain A and HU; in addition, Type 2 complexes contained Mu B. However, both the HU and the Mu B protein were found to be loosely associated and could be quantitatively removed from the nucleoprotein core of both complexes by incubation in 0.5 M NaCl. Depletion of HU from the Type 1 complex did not affect the ability of this complex to be converted into the strand-transferred product. Hence, the indispensable role of the HU protein in the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction is limited to the formation of the Type 1 transpososome.     

Inversion of the phosphate chirality at the target site of Mu DNA strand transfer: evidence for a one-step transesterification mechanism.

Central to transposition of phage Mu are two reactions mediated by the MuA protein. First, MuA introduces single-stranded cuts at the ends of the Mu DNA to generate 3' OH termini. In the subsequent strand-transfer step, the MuA-Mu DNA end complex cuts a target DNA and joins the Mu 3' ends to the 5' ends of the target. DNA containing chiral phosphorothioates was used to demonstrate inversion of the chirality during the course of strand transfer. This result strongly supports a one-step transesterification mechanism in which the 3' OH of the cleaved donor DNA is the attacking nucleophile. Furthermore, this donor 3' OH group was essential for target DNA cleavage. In contrast, during lambda integration the phosphate chirality was retained, as expected for a two-step transesterification involving a covalent protein-DNA intermediate.     

Origin and binding specificity of protein(s) coded for by Mu prophages

Summary Crude extracts of bacteria lysogenic for temperate phage Mu contain proteins that retain specifically Mu DNA on nitrocellulose filters. The amount of binding protein is directly proportional to the number of Mu prophages per E. coli genome. Specificity of the binding reaction could be demonstrated by using heterologous DNAs as substrate and by a competition experiment. By using hybrid plasmids containing different amounts of the immunity end and extending to various degrees into Mu DNA, it was found that the binding activity is coded for by the left 1,000 nucleotide-pair HindIII fragment. When using these hybrid plasmids as binding substrate, two different binding sites for the immunity product were detected. Joining of the MucI gene to the left early promoter resulted in increased production of immunity protein at elevated temperature. A possible explanation for the relatively low amounts of immunity protein in all of the different strains studied is discussed.This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant Ba 600/1)     

Differential role of the Mu B protein in phage Mu integration vs. replication: mechanistic insights into two transposition pathways

The Mu B protein is an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and an allosteric activator of the Mu transposase. As a result of these activities, Mu B is instrumental in efficient transposition and target-site choice. We analysed in vivo the role of Mu B in the two different recombination reactions performed by phage Mu: non-replicative transposition, the pathway used during integration, and replicative transposition, the pathway used during lytic growth. Utilizing a sensitive PCR-based assay for Mu transposition, we found that Mu B is not required for integration, but enhances the rate and extent of the process. Furthermore, three different mutant versions of Mu B, Mu BC99Y, Mu BK106A, and Mu B1-294, stimulate integration to a similar level as the wild-type protein. In contrast, these mutant proteins fail to support Mu growth. This deficiency is attributable to a defect in formation of an essential intermediate for replicative transposition. Biochemical analysis of the Mu B mutant proteins reveals common features: the mutants retain the ability to stimulate transposase, but are defective in DNA binding and target DNA delivery. These data indicate that activation of transposase by Mu B is sufficient for robust non-replicative transposition. Efficient replicative transposition, however, demands that the Mu B protein not only activate transposase, but also bind and deliver the target DNA.     

Mechanism of transposition of bacteriophage Mu: structure of a transposition intermediate

Mu transposition works efficiently in vitro and generates both cointegrate and simple insert products. We have examined the reaction products obtained under modified in vitro reaction conditions that do not permit efficient initiation of DNA replication. The major product is precisely the intermediate structure predicted from one of the current models of DNA transposition. Both cointegrates and simple inserts can be made in vitro using this intermediate as the DNA substrate, demonstrating that it is indeed a true transposition intermediate. The requirements for efficient formation of the intermediate include the Mu A protein, the Mu B protein, an unknown number of E. coli host proteins, ATP, and divalent cation. Only E. coli host proteins are required for conversion of the intermediate to cointegrate or simple insert products. Structures resulting from DNA strand transfer at only one end of the transposon are not observed, suggesting that the strand transfers at each end of the transposon are tightly coupled.     

Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. In vitro transposition characteristics of mini-Mu plasmids carrying terminal base pair mutations.

We have examined the effects of a T----C point mutation at the terminal nucleotide of the Mu ends in a mini-Mu plasmid on the early steps in the in vitro transposition reaction. These mutations inhibit the introduction of nicks at the Mu ends in a reaction with Mu A, HU, and integration host factor proteins. The presence of the point mutation at either the left end or the right end is sufficient to block the nicking reaction at both ends, indicating that the reaction is normally concerted. Addition of Mu B and ATP, however, dramatically stimulates the reaction of mutant mini-Mu plasmids carrying the mutation at one end but not at both ends. The data suggest that the Mu B protein mediates its effect through direct interaction with Mu A and that Mu B may play a role in an earlier step in the transposition process than previously proposed. In the presence of Mu B, two products are observed with the left end or right end mutant mini-Mu plasmids, a normal protein-DNA intermediate (Type 1 complex) which contains nicks at both Mu ends and an abortive product composed of free relaxed plasmid which is nicked only at the wild-type end. Furthermore, stable protein-DNA complexes characteristic of the first step in the in vitro transposition reaction are not observed in the absence of nicking or when only one end is a nicked; the introduction of nicks at both Mu ends is a prerequisite for stable transpososome assembly.     

A truncated form of the bacteriophage Mu B protein promotes conservative integration, but not replicative transposition, of Mu DNA

The phage-encoded proteins required for conservative integration of infecting bacteriophage Mu DNA were investigated. Our findings show that functional gpA, an essential component of the phage transposition system, is required for integration. The Mu B protein, which greatly enhances replicative transposition of Mu DNA, is also required. Furthermore, a truncated form of gpB lacking 18 amino acids from the carboxy terminus is blocked in replicative transposition, but not conservative integration. Our results point to a more prominent role for gpB than simply a replication enhancer in Mu DNA transposition. The ability of a truncated form of B to function in conservative integration, but not replicative transposition, also suggests a key role for the carboxy-terminal domain of the protein in the replicative reaction. The existence of a shortened form of gpB, which uncouples conservative integration from replicative transposition, should be invaluable for future dissection of Mu DNA transposition.     

Flanking host sequences can exert an inhibitory effect on the cleavage step of the in vitro mu DNA strand transfer reaction.

The effect of flanking host sequences on the cleavage step of the in vitro Mu DNA strand transfer reaction was investigated. Insertion of a mini-Mu molecule into certain sites in pUC19 results in insertions that demonstrate a decreased ability to form Type 1 complexes in subsequent rounds of transposition. Similarly, changes in the flanking host sequences directly adjacent to the Mu ends by in vitro mutagenesis can also result in Type 1-deficient mini-Mu molecules. Further examination of the inhibition revealed that Type 1 deficient mini-Mu molecules are capable of forming uncut synaptic complexes at normal levels but are compromised in their ability to serve as substrates for phosphodiester bond hydrolysis at the Mu ends. This cleavage defect can be overcome by addition of the Mu B protein and ATP to the reaction. Our data suggest that one of the roles of the B protein may be to provide a mechanism whereby Mu prophages with inhibitory flanking sequences can overcome this obstacle and avoid being trapped at unproductive locations.     

Behavior of bacteriophage Mu DNA upon infecton of Escherichia coli cells.

The question whether the ends of bacteriophage Mu DNA are fused to form a ring in host cells is critical to the understanding of the mechanism of integrative recombination between Mu DNA and host DNA. We have examined the fate of ³²P-labeled Mu DNA, after infection of sensitive and immune (lysogenic) cells, by sedimentation in sucrose gradients, ethidium bromide/CsCl density centrifugation and by electrophoresis of parental Mu DNA and its fragments in agarose gels. We find that the parental Mu DNA cannot be detected as covalently closed circles at any stage during the Mu life cycle. An interesting form of Mu DNA can be seen after superinfection of immune cells. This form sediments about twice as fast as the mature phage DNA marker in neutral sucrose gradients but yields linear molecules upon phenol extraction. Upon infection of sensitive cells, most of the parental DNA associates with a large complex, presumably containing the host chromosome. When Mu-sensitive cells are infected with unlabeled Mu particles and Mu DNA examined at different times after infection by fractionation in 0.3% agarose gels and hybridization with ³²P-labeled Mu DNA, Mu sequences are found to appear with the bulk host DNA as the phage lytic cycle progresses. However, no distinct replicative or integrative intermediate of Mu, that behaves differently from linear Mu DNA and is separate from the host DNA, can be detected.