Hypervariable region 1 variants act as TCR antagonists for hepatitis C virus-specific CD4+ T cells.

In various human viral infections, the appearance of mutated epitopes displaying TCR antagonistic activity has been correlated with the severity and persistence of infection. In hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, where the virus persistence has been associated with the rapid and substantial Ag modifications occurring during replication, TCR antagonism has been evidenced in CD8+ T cell responses. However, CD4+ T cell antagonism may be another important strategy by which HCV eludes a protective response, because sustained Th responses directed against several HCV Ags are associated with a self-limited course of infection. The data reported here represent the first evidence that variants of the hypervariable region (HVR1) of the putative Envelope 2 protein of HCV can act as powerful TCR antagonists for HVR1-specific CD4+ T cells isolated from HCV-infected individuals. Using classical antagonism assays, we observed strong inhibition of cellular proliferation and cytokine production when the agonist and the antagonist ligands were simultaneously presented by the same APCs. The presence in HVR1 of conserved residues, critical for binding to HLA-DR molecules, supports the function of HVR1 variants as TCR antagonists. In conclusion, our data evidence an antagonism phenomenon, which was achieved by naturally occurring class II-restricted T cell epitopes whose mechanism was addressed in terms of the antagonist capacity to inhibit agonist-mediated TCR down-regulation and early signal transduction.     

In vivo modulation of T cell responses and protective immunity by TCR antagonism during infection

Infectious agents are known to express altered peptide ligands that antagonize T cells in vitro; however, direct evidence of TCR antagonism during infection is still lacking, and its importance in the context of infection remains to be established. In this study, we used a murine model of infection with recombinant Listeria monocytogenes and addressed three issues that are critical for assessing the role of TCR antagonism in the modulation of the immune response. First, we demonstrated that the antagonist peptide efficiently inhibited the ability of the agonist to prime naive TCR-transgenic T cells in vivo. Second, we showed clonal memory T cells were antagonized during recall responses, resulting in loss of protective immunity. Lastly, we observed that even in the context of a polyclonal response, TCR antagonism greatly inhibits the agonist-specific response, leading to altered hierarchy of immunodominance and reduced T cell memory and protective immunity. These results provide direct evidence of clonal TCR antagonism of naive and memory CD8 T cells during infection and demonstrate the effect of TCR antagonism on protective immunity. Thus, agonist/antagonist interactions may play an important role in determining the immunodominance and repertoire of T cell targets, and evaluation of immune responses and vaccine strategies may require examination of not only agonists but also antagonists and their interactions during an infection.     

Cutting edge: a test of the dominant negative signal model for TCR antagonism

The mechanism by which TCR antagonists interfere with T cell activation is unclear. One popular hypothesis is that incomplete early signaling events induced by these ligands dominantly inhibit the T cell's ability to respond to a copresented agonist ligand. Here we test this "dominant negative" signal hypothesis by studying T cells expressing two distinct MHC class I-restricted TCRs (2C and OT-I). Although responses through each TCR can be efficiently inhibited by their specific antagonists, we found no evidence for "cross-antagonism" in which an antagonist for receptor "A" blocks responses through receptor "B." Such inhibition would have been expected were the dominant negative signaling hypothesis correct, and alternative models for TCR antagonism are discussed.     

Mechanisms of T cell receptor antagonism: implications in the treatment of disease

The adaptive immune response is often required for the successful clearing of infectious pathogens. Antigen presenting cells (APC) present peptide antigens derived from pathogens to T cells via major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. T cells then become activated and differentiate into effector cells with the capacity to kill infected cells or to induce an anti-pathogen antibody response. In autoimmunity, this T cell response is directed against self-antigens and often leads to deleterious effects on specific tissues. Likewise, T cell responses to allogeneic MHC molecules in transplants also leads to pathology. By introducing subtle changes in the antigenic peptide amino acid content, T cell activation can be inhibited, thereby preventing T cell effector functions. This strategy of TCR antagonism has been used successfully in vitro and in vivo to inhibit models of autoimmunity and allorecognition. In addition, a variety of pathogens that often result in chronic disease following infection, also have seemingly evolved natural mechanisms to inhibit T cell responses by antagonism. These microorganisms express natural variants of certain proteins, that when presented to T cells have the capacity to specifically inhibit T cell responses by functioning as antagonists or by modulating the nature of the T cell response. The understanding of how pathogens mediate this inhibition in vivo will be beneficial to ongoing studies in both autoimmunity and transplantation aimed at suppressing the harmful immune response, thereby controlling disease. TCR antagonism seems to have the potential to be used therapeutically to prevent or inhibit an undesired T cell response that will ultimately lead to disease.     

Galectin-1 induces partial TCR zeta-chain phosphorylation and antagonizes processive TCR signal transduction

Galectin-1 is an endogenous lectin with known T cell immunoregulatory activity, though the molecular basis by which galectin-1 influences Ag specific T cell responses has not been elucidated. Here, we characterize the ability of galectin-1 to modulate TCR signals and responses by T cells with well defined hierarchies of threshold requirements for signaling distinct functional responses. We demonstrate that galectin-1 antagonizes TCR responses known to require costimulation and processive protein tyrosine phosphorylation, such as IL-2 production, but is permissive for TCR responses that only require partial TCR signals, such as IFN-gamma production, CD69 up-regulation, and apoptosis. Galectin-1 binding alone or together with Ag stimulation induces partial phosphorylation of TCR-zeta and the generation of inhibitory pp21zeta. Galectin-1 antagonizes Ag induced signals and TCR/costimulator dependent lipid raft clustering at the TCR contact site. We propose that galectin-1 functions as a T cell "counterstimulator" to limit required protein segregation and lipid raft reorganization at the TCR contact site and, thus, processive and sustained TCR signal transduction. These findings support the concept that TCR antagonism can arise from the generation of an inhibitory pp21zeta-based TCR signaling complex. Moreover, they demonstrate that TCR antagonism can result from T cell interactions with a ligand other than peptide/MHC.     

Altered peptide ligand-mediated TCR antagonism can be modulated by a change in a single amino acid residue within the CDR3 beta of an MHC class I-restricted TCR

The Ag receptor of cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes recognizes peptides of 8-10 aa bound to MHC class I molecules. This Ag recognition event leads to the activation of the CD8+ lymphocyte and subsequent lysis of the target cell. Altered peptide ligands are analogues derived from the original antigenic peptide that commonly carry amino acid substitutions at TCR contact residues. TCR engagement by these altered peptide ligands usually impairs normal T cell function. Some of these altered peptide ligands (antagonists) are able to specifically antagonize and inhibit T cell activation induced by the wild-type antigenic peptide. Despite significant advances made in understanding TCR antagonism, the molecular interactions between the TCR and the MHC/peptide complex responsible for the inhibitory activity of antagonist peptides remain elusive. To approach this question, we have identified altered peptide ligands derived from the vesicular stomatitis virus peptide (RGYVYQGL) that specifically antagonize an H-2Kb/vesicular stomatitis virus-specific TCR. Furthermore, by site-directed mutagenesis, we altered single amino acid residues of the complementarity-determining region 3 of the beta-chain of this TCR and tested the effect of these point mutations on Ag recognition and TCR antagonism. Here we show that a single amino acid change on the TCR CDR3 beta loop can modulate the TCR-antagonistic properties of an altered peptide ligand. Our results highlight the role of the TCR complementarity-determining region 3 loops for controlling the nature of the T cell response to TCR/altered peptide ligand interactions, including those leading to TCR antagonism.     

Antigen-specific inhibition of CD4+ T-cell responses to β-lactoglobulin by its single amino acid-substituted mutant form through T-cell receptor antagonism

T cell responses can be antagonized by some single amino acid-substituted analogs of a peptide ligand for T-cell receptors (TCR), and these are called TCR antagonists. In this study, we addressed the question of whether TCR antagonism can be elicited by a whole protein antigen carrying a mutated T-cell determinant region corresponding to a TCR antagonist peptide. To clarify this, we examined the ability of a single amino acid-substituted mutant form of bovine β-lactoglobulin (β-Lg) to inhibit three CD4⁺ T-cell clones recognizing a peptide corresponding to an immunodominant determinant region 119-133 of β-Lg (p119-133). First, we identified pD129A, an analog of p119-133 with a substitution of Ala for ¹²⁹Asp, as an antagonist which can inhibit the response of two of the three T-cell clones. Then, using a yeast expression system, we prepared a mutant β-Lg (mutD129A) with the same substitution of Ala for ¹²⁹Asp as that in pD129A. This mutant protein could inhibit the proliferation of the two T-cell clones in a manner similar to the effect of pD129A. From these results we can demonstrate that TCR antagonism can be elicited by peptides naturally processed from a single-substituted mutant protein as well as by the corresponding peptides added exogenously. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

T cell antagonism is functionally uncoupled from the 21- and 23-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated TCR zeta subunits

The functional effects of altered peptide ligands on T cells is proposed to involve differential intracellular signaling mediated by the 21- and 23-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated derivatives of the TCR zeta subunit (p21 and p23). To understand the functional contribution of p21 and p23 to T cell development and T cell antagonism, we generated selected TCR zeta transgenic mice maintained on the P14 alphabeta TCR transgenic line such that p23 or both p21 and p23 were selectively eliminated. Importantly, one line (YF1,2) retains the constitutively tyrosine-phosphorylated p21 in the complete absence of inducible p23. We determined that T cell development was uncoupled from p21 and/or p23. Using a series of agonist, weak agonist, and antagonist peptides, we analyzed the role of each of the phosphorylated forms of TCR zeta on T cell activation and antagonism. In this study, we report that the proliferative responses of alphabeta P14 T cells to agonist peptides and the inhibition of proliferation resulting from antagonist peptide treatments was functionally uncoupled from p21 and/or p23. These results suggest that the mechanism of T cell antagonism is independent of the two phosphorylated TCR zeta derivatives.     

Cutting edge: N-hydroxy peptides: a new class of TCR antagonists.

TCR antagonists are altered T cell epitopes that specifically inactivate T cells. Commonly, they are derived from agonists by amino acid side chain replacement at positions accessible to the TCR. In this paper we report for the first time that a main chain N-hydroxylation, which is not exposed at the surface of the MHC peptide complex, renders an agonist into an antagonist. These mimotopes are a new, yet undescribed class of TCR antagonists. The antagonists are about 100 times more potent than an unrelated peptide that competes for binding to the MHC molecule. The novel main chain modification enhances biostability and maintains side chain constitution and thus opens new prospects for the use of TCR antagonists in the treatment of pathological immune reactions.     

Antagonism of antiviral and allogeneic activity of a human public CTL clonotype by a single altered peptide ligand: implications for allograft rejection

Alloreactive T lymphocytes are central mediators of graft-versus-host disease and allograft rejection. A public CTL clonotype with specificity for the alloantigens HLA-B*4402 and B*4405 is often expanded to large numbers in healthy HLA-B*0801(+) individuals, driven by cross-reactive stimulation with the common, persistent herpesvirus EBV. Since such alloreactive memory CTL expansions have the potential to influence transplantation outcome, altered peptide ligands (APLs) of the target HLA-B*0801-binding EBV peptide, FLRGRAYGL, were screened as specific antagonists for this immunodominant clonotype. One APL, FLRGRFYGL, exerted powerful antagonism of a prototypic T cell clone expressing this immunodominant TCR when costimulated with target cells presenting HLA-B*0801(FLRGRAYGL). Significantly, this APL also reduced the lysis of allogeneic target cells expressing HLA-B*4402 by up to 99%. The affinities of the agonist and antagonist complexes for the public TCR, measured using solution and solid-phase assays, were 8 and 138 muM, respectively. Surprisingly, the half-life of the agonist and antagonist complexes was similar, yet the association rate for the antagonist complex was significantly slower. These observations were further supported by structural studies that suggested a large conformational hurdle was required to ligate the immunodominant TCR to the HLA-B*0801 antagonist complex. By defining an antagonist APL against an immunodominant alloreactive TCR, these findings raise the prospect of exploiting such peptides to inhibit clinical alloreactivity, particularly against clonal T cell expansions that react with alloantigens.     

Study of the mechanism of TCR antagonism using dual-TCR-expressing T cells

The mechanism of action of TCR antagonists is incompletely understood. T cells expressing two distinct TCRs have been used to test competition for TCR occupancy as a potential mechanism. Previous studies with CD4 T cells showed that an antagonist for one TCR inhibited the response to the other TCR (cross-antagonism), whereas studies with CD8 cells failed to demonstrate cross-antagonism. To determine whether CD4 and CD8 cells were intrinsically different or whether the differences were the result of the use of different effector assays, we studied both CD4 and CD8 dual-TCR-expressing T cells. In the CD4 system, consistent with previous reports, cross-antagonism of proliferation was observed. In the CD8 system, cross-antagonism was observed using proliferation as readout but not when target cell cytolysis was used. These results suggest that different mechanisms may be involved in the inhibition of proliferation and inhibition of cytotoxic effector function, the latter only involving competition for TCR occupancy. Inhibition of proliferation appears to be more complex and other mechanisms such as sequestration of signaling molecules or negative signaling may be involved. The fact that 10- to 20-fold more antagonist was needed to achieve cross-antagonism compared with inhibition of the cognate TCR is consistent with the hypothesis that competition for TCR occupancy is also a major, albeit not sole, mechanism of antagonism of the proliferative responses of CD4 and CD8 cells.     

High affinity T cell receptors from yeast display libraries block T cell activation by superantigens

The alphabeta T cell receptor (TCR) can be triggered by a class of ligands called superantigens. Enterotoxins secreted by bacteria act as superantigens by simultaneously binding to an MHC class II molecule on an antigen- presenting cell and to a TCR beta-chain, thereby causing activation of the T cell. The cross-reactivity of enterotoxins with different Vbeta regions can lead to stimulation of a large fraction of T cells. To understand the molecular details of TCR-enterotoxin interactions and to generate potential antagonists of these serious hyperimmune reactions, we engineered soluble TCR mutants with improved affinity for staphylococcal enterotoxin C3 (SEC3). A library of randomly mutated, single-chain TCRs (Vbeta-linker-Valpha) were expressed as fusions to the Aga2p protein on the surface of yeast cells. Mutants were selected by flow cytometric cell sorting with a fluorescent-labeled SEC3. Various mutations were identified, primarily in Vbeta residues that are located at the TCR:SEC3 interface. The combined mutations created a remodeled SEC3-binding surface and yielded a Vbeta domain with an affinity that was increased by 1000-fold (K(D)=7 nM). A soluble form of this Vbeta mutant was a potent inhibitor of SEC3-mediated T cell activity, suggesting that these engineered proteins may be useful as antagonists.     

The role of T cell antagonism and original antigenic sin in genetic immunization

To counter highly mutable pathogens like HIV-1, a number of vaccines are being developed to deliver multiple mutant forms of viral Ags to provoke multivalent antiviral CTLs. However, it is uncertain whether such multiple mutant epitope vaccines will generate the diverse CTL responses desired or will instead create immune interference. To characterize the role of immune interference by mutant epitopes in this process, we have tested a "worst case" scenario in which the immunodominant epitope of OVA (SIINFEKL) and its in vitro TCR antagonist (SIINFEDL) have been used to genetically immunize C57BL/6 mice. We demonstrate here that sequential delivery of these mutant epitopes provokes original antigenic sin in CD8 T cells as demonstrated by attenuation of CTLs, intracellular IFN-gamma production, and MHC I peptide-tetramer staining. By contrast, simultaneous exposure of the immune system to this agonist/antagonist pair not only fails to generate T cell antagonism in vivo, but also avoids original antigenic sin. These observations suggest that simultaneous immunization with vaccines containing mutant epitopes, even T cell antagonists, can indeed generate a diverse array of T cell responses and that at least some immune interference can be avoided by delivering mutant Ags to the immune system simultaneously.     

Magnitude of structural changes of the T-cell receptor binding regions determine the strength of T-cell antagonism: molecular dynamics simulations of HLA-DR4 (DRB1*0405) complexed with analogue peptide

In our model system, we generated T cell clones specific for the HLA-DR4 (DRB1*0405)-index peptide (YWALEAAAD) complex. Based on response patterns of the T cell clones, analogue peptides containing single amino acid substitutions of the index peptide were classified into three types, agonists, antagonists or null peptides (non-agonistic and non-antagonistic peptides). Subtle structural changes induced by the antagonists in the T-cell receptor (TCR) binding regions have already been explained using the root mean square (r.m.s.) deviations from the DR4-index peptide complex in the molecular dynamics (MD) trajectory. In this work, we performed additional MD simulations at 300 K with explicit solvent molecules to reveal the structural character of the HLA-DR4 complexed with the analogue peptides. We examined the r.m.s. deviations of the TCR-binding sites and the exposed areas of the bound peptides. Remarkable differences of the r.m.s. deviations among the DR4-antagonist complexes, together with our previous data, suggest that the magnitude of structural changes of TCR-binding regions would determine the strength of TCR antagonism. The simulations also indicate that TCR could discriminate null peptides from other ligands mainly through the changes of exposed side chains of the bound peptide, rather than the conformational changes of TCR-binding surfaces on HLA molecule.     

Cutting edge: dueling TCRs: peptide antagonism of CD4+ T cells with dual antigen specificities.

T cells expressing two different TCRs were generated by interbreeding 3A9 and AND CD4+ TCR transgenic mice specific for the hen egg lysozyme (HEL) peptide 48-62:I-Ak and moth cytochrome c (MCC) peptide 88-103:I-Ek peptide:MHC ligands, respectively. Peripheral T cells in the offspring express two TCR V beta-chains and respond to HEL and MCC. We observed minimal or no additive effects upon simultaneous suboptimal stimulation with both agonist peptides; however, an antagonist peptide for the 3A9 TCR was able to inhibit the response of the dual receptor T cells to MCC, the AND TCR agonist. This HEL antagonist peptide did not affect AND single transgenic T cells, indicating that the antagonism observed in the dual TCR cells is dependent on the presence of the HEL-specific 3A9 TCR. In contrast, anti-TCR Abs mediate receptor-specific antagonism. These results demonstrate that peptide antagonism exerts a dominant effect.     

Partial T cell activation with an altered superantigenic ligand

T cells have the capacity to respond to ligands as full, weak, partial or null agonists, or indeed as antagonists. In the present paper, it is reported that staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) mutated in a T cell receptor (TCR) contact site (SEBDelta61Y) behaves as an altered ligand for a T cell clone (AC20) that expresses the Vbeta17 TCR. The T cells were partially activated by SEBDelta61Y, as shown by TCR down-modulation and up-regulation of the IL-2 receptor. However, these cells did not secrete IL-2, IL-3, IL-4 or IFN-gamma, nor did they proliferate. Analysis of intracellular protein tyrosine phosphorylation after cellular activation provided further evidence that SEBDelta61Y could transduce a signal via the Vbeta17 TCR. The events following receptor ligation were clearly different when the T cells were stimulated with SEB or SEBDelta61Y, manifested as both quantitatively and qualitatively different patterns of phosphorylation of intracellular substrates. In contrast, only quantitative differences were apparent when a transfectant expressing the same alpha/beta TCR was stimulated with the different superantigens. Together, these results provide the first demonstration that altered TCR ligands are not restricted to peptides substituted at secondary TCR contact residues. Rather, an altered superantigenic ligand mutated in the TCR binding site can behave as a partial agonist.     

Cutting edge: in vivo identification of TCR redistribution and polarized IL-2 production by naive CD4 T cells

TCR aggregation at the point of contact with an APC is thought to play an important role in T cell signal transduction. However, this potentially important phenomenon has never been documented during an immune response in vivo. Here we used immunohistology to show that the TCR on naive Ag-specific CD4 T cells in the lymph nodes of mice injected with Ag redistributed to one side of the cell. In cases where the APC could be identified, the TCR was concentrated on the side of the T cell facing the APC. In those T cells that produced IL-2, the TCR and IL-2 localized to the same side of the cell. In vivo IL-2 production depended on costimulatory signaling through CD28, whereas TCR redistribution did not. These results show that Ag-stimulated CD4 T cells produce IL-2 in a polarized fashion and undergo CD28-independent TCR redistribution in vivo.     

Differential CD3 zeta phosphorylation is not required for the induction of T cell antagonism by altered peptide ligands.

T cells recognize foreign Ags in the form of short peptides bound to MHC molecules. Ligation of the TCR:CD3 complex gives rise to the generation of two tyrosine-phosphorylated forms of the CD3 zeta-chain, pp21 and pp23. Replacement of residues in MHC-bound peptides that alter its recognition by the TCR can generate altered peptide ligands (APL) that antagonize T cell responses to the original agonist peptide, leading to altered T cell function and anergy. This biological process has been linked to differential CD3zeta phosphorylation and generation of only the pp21 phospho-species. Here, we show that T cells expressing CD3zeta mutants, which cannot be phosphorylated, exhibit a 5-fold reduction in IL-2 production and a 30-fold reduction in sensitivity following stimulation with an agonist peptide. However, these T cells are still strongly antagonized by APL. These data demonstrate that: 1) the threshold required for an APL to block a response is much lower than for an agonist peptide to induce a response, 2) CD3zeta is required for full agonist but not antagonist responses, and 3) differential CD3zeta phosphorylation is not a prerequisite for T cell antagonism.     

Stochastic effects and bistability in T cell receptor signaling

The stochastic dynamics of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling are studied using a mathematical model intended to capture kinetic proofreading (sensitivity to ligand-receptor binding kinetics) and negative and positive feedback regulation mediated, respectively, by the phosphatase SHP1 and the MAP kinase ERK. The model incorporates protein-protein interactions involved in initiating TCR-mediated cellular responses and reproduces several experimental observations about the behavior of TCR signaling, including robust responses to as few as a handful of ligands (agonist peptide-MHC complexes on an antigen-presenting cell), distinct responses to ligands that bind TCR with different lifetimes, and antagonism. Analysis of the model indicates that TCR signaling dynamics are marked by significant stochastic fluctuations and bistability, which is caused by the competition between the positive and negative feedbacks. Stochastic fluctuations are such that single-cell trajectories differ qualitatively from the trajectory predicted in the deterministic approximation of the dynamics. Because of bistability, the average of single-cell trajectories differs markedly from the deterministic trajectory. Bistability combined with stochastic fluctuations allows for switch-like responses to signals, which may aid T cells in making committed cell-fate decisions.