Implications of Differential Chemotaxis and Cohesiveness for Cell Sorting in the Development of Dictyostelium discoideum

Cell sorting behavior was observed during the development of Dictyostelium discoideum Ax-2, between cells grown with [G(+) cells] and without [G(−) cells] glucose. Development of the G(−) cells was about 2-3 hr faster, as reflected by differences in chemotactic sensitivity of the cells and cell cohesiveness. Among various mixing combinations of G(−) and G(+) cells, the most clear sorting occured when vegetative G(+) cells were mixed with G(−) cells which had been allowed to develop for 3 hr, the G(−) cells being located in the anterior prestalk region of a migrating slug. In contrast, vegetative G(−) cells moved to the posterior prespore region of a slug when mixed with G(+) cells which had developed for 6 hr. These findings indicate a close relationship of the cellular developmental stage to the sorting behavior. Possible implications of the differential chemotactic ability and cohesiveness for the sorting mechanism are disscussed.     

Prestalk/prespore differentiation tendency of Dictyostelium discoideum cells as detected by a stalk-specific monoclonal antibody

By the use of a prestalk- and stalk-specific monoclonal antibody, production of prestalk antigen was examined with non-glucose grown [G(-)] and glucose grown [G(+)] cells of Dictyostelium discoideum AX2. Unlike wild type (NC4), some growth phase cells of AX2 were reactive with the antibody. However, G(-) cells contained much more antigen than G(+) cells and the difference between the two remained during the preaggregation period. Besides glucose, the addition of metabolizable, but not nonmetabolizable sugars to both growth phase and preaggregation cells suppressed the production of the prestalk antigen on the one hand and stimulated the accumulation of glycogen on the other hand. When mixed, G(-) cells which produced more prestalk antigen during the preaggregation period remained prestalk cells after aggregation, while G(+) cells which produced less antigen were converted to prespore cells. G(+) cells collected at the stationary phase [G(+)st] were stronger in prestalk sorting tendency than G(+) cells but weaker than G(-) cells. The prestalk antigen content of G(+)st cells prior to aggregation was an intermediate between those of G(-) and G(+) cells. These lead to the conclusion that the prestalk antigen content of preaggregation cells reflect the tendency of the cells toward either prestalk or prespore differentiation after aggregation.     

Correlations between prestalk-prespore tendencies and cAMP-related activities in Dictyostelium discoideum

Amoebae of the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum (strain Ax2) grown in axenic medium containing 86 mM glucose [G(+) cells] or no glucose [G(−) cells] were examined for the characteristics of aggregation, cAMP secretion rate, cAMP phosphodiesterase activity and cell surface cAMP-binding activity. (When G(+) and G(−) cells are mixed, G(+) cells preferentially differentiate into prespore cells and sort out to the posterior region of a slug.)Under the same conditions, G(−) cells aggregate later than G(+) cells and the formation of stable streams by G(−) cells was particularly delayed. The movements of G(−) cells during aggregation were less organized compared with the ordered behaviour of G(+) cells, yet G(−) cells seemed to be more sensitive to chemotactic signals. Furthermore, the cAMP-binding activity of G(−) cells was considerably higher than that of G(+) cells, a difference that is probably due to the difference in the number of the cAMP receptor sites. Also G(−) cells, compared to G(+) cells, secreted slightly more cAMP and showed higher activity of cell-bound phosphodiesterase activity at the aggregation stage, whereas the extracellular phosphodiesterase activity was lower, although these differences were minor.     

Evidence that positional information is used to establish the prestalk-prespore pattern in Dictyostelium discoideum aggregates

Two contrasting mechanisms have been proposed for the establishment of the prestalk-prespore pattern in the multicellular aggregate of the simple eukaryote Dictyostelium discoideum. One involves intermingled, non-position-dependent cell differentiation followed by sorting out which produces the pattern of prestalk cells in the anterior region and prespore cells posteriorly. The second mechanism involves patterning according to the position of cells within the aggregate, in which case intermingled cell types are not expected. Here we use a monoclonal antibody (MUD1), recognising a prespore cell surface antigen, to study the initial appearance of prespore cells in aggregates. Quantitative studies were made with a flow cytometer and frozen sections were used to localise the cells expressing the prespore antigen. This antigen first appeared at the onset of tip formation in the centre of aggregates in a position-dependent fashion. The prespore antigen was not detected in the tip region or in streams of cells entering the aggregate. We re-examined the evidence on which the non-position-dependent differentiation model is based. Our results support the positional model for pattern formation.     

Origins of the prestalk-prespore pattern in Dictyostelium development

Using cell-autonomous markers we have traced the origins of prespore cells and two types of prestalk cells (pstA and pstB cells) during slug formation. We show that cell sorting and positional information both contribute to Dictyostelium morphogenesis. The initial pattern established at the mound stage is topologically quite different from that of the slug. Confirming previous studies, we find that prespore cells occupy most of the aggregate but are absent from a thin layer at the base and from the emerging tip. PstB cells are almost entirely localized to the basal region during the early stages of tip formation. Thus prespore and pstB cell differentiation appear to occur in response to localized morphogenetic signals. In the case of pstB cells, these signals presumably emanate from the base and not, as might be expected, from the tip. When first detectable, pstA cells are scattered throughout the aggregate. They then appear to migrate to the apex, where the tip forms.     

Dictyostelium mucoroides cells exhibit cell cycle-dependent sorting behavior as observed in D. discoideum development

Evidence has been obtained indicating that the cell's position in the cell cycle at the onset of starvation is a naturally occurring variable closely involved in the subsequent sorting and pattern formation during the development of Dictyostelium discoideum Ax2. It is of interest to know whether a similar phenomenon is also noticed in species other than D. discoideum and also without any treatment of cells for cell synchronization. For this, the sorting behavior of D. mucoroides-7 ( Dm7 ) cells and its relation to the cell-cycle phase at the onset of starvation were analyzed, using non-synchronized Dm7 cells pulse-labeled with 5'-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU). The results demonstrate that Dm7 cells starved at the early G2 phase aggregate most rapidly, but are eventually sorted out to the posterior prespore zone of migrating slugs. In contrast, cells starved at the mid late G2 phase exhibited slower aggregation, but were sorted out to the anterior zone (tip), this being basically similar to the sorting behavior of D. discoideum cells. Measurements of cell numbers and nuclearity provided evidence that approximately 80% of cells progressed their cell-cycle after the formation of multicellular structures (mounds), probably coupling with prespore differentiation as in the case of D. discoideum . Thus, cell cycle-dependent sorting during Dictyostelium development is most likely to be a common phenomenon in different species.     

The Dictyostelium cell cycle and its relationship to differentiation

Abstract The Dictyostelium vegetative cell cycle is characterized by a short mitotic period followed immediately by a short S-phase (less than 30 min) and a long and variable G2 phase. The cell cycle continues during differentiation despite a decrease in cell mass: DNA replication and mitosis occur early in development and also at the tipped aggregate stage. Cells that are in mitosis, S-phase or early G2, when starved differentiate into prestalk cells and cells that are in the middle of G2 differentiate into prespore cells. We postulate that there is a restriction point late in the G2 phase, about 1–2 h before mitosis, where the cells can be arrested either by starvation and the initiation of development, by growing into stationary phase, or by prolonged incubation at low temperature. During development, this block persists to the tipped aggregate stage, where it is specifically released in prespore cells, and these cells then go through one more round of cell division. Genes encoding components of the cell cycle machinery have recently been isolated and attemps to specifically block the cell cycle by reverse genetics to study the effects on differentiation have been initiated.     

Pattern Formation in Dictyostelium discoideum: Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Prespore Vacuoles

Cell differentiation, cell determination and pattern formation in the pseudoplasmodium of Dictyostelium discoideum , was investigated using the prespore specific vacuole (PV) as a morphological marker. Concomitantly, measurements of cell movement within the pseudoplasmodium were made by tracing radioactively labelled cells. The main results indicate that 1) prespore cells appear first during late aggregation and occur randomly throughout the pseudoplasmodium with the exception of the very tip which stays free of prespore cells throughout development; 2) after late aggregation the number of prespore cells increases over a period of several hours; 3) each prespore cell takes on a progressively more prespore-like character as judged by the increase in number of PVs it contains; 4) establishment of the distribution pattern of prespore and prestalk cells takes place within the first 2 h, mainly by a sorting out mechanism; 5) presumptive spore areas are likely to contain a small proportion of cells lacking PVs (prestalk-cells?) while presumptive stalk cell areas are homogeneous throughout; 6) maintenance of the pattern during migration may be facilitated by a circulation at low level of prestalk cells between prestalk and prespore areas; and 7) during the development of this organism the events of cell determination, cell differentiation and pattern formation overlap substantially in time.     

Patterns of cell differentiation revealed by L-[3H]fucose incorporation in Dictyostelium

A study of the incorporation of l-[6-³H]fucose and d-[6-³H]glucosamine hydrochloride was conducted during the development of the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum 1-H. Autoradiographs revealed that pulse-labeled vegetative amoebae incorporated [³H]fucose intracytoplasmically within 15 min. The majority of the cells had randomly scattered silver grains but the remainder were distinguished by a dense localized labeling which suggested that oligo or polysaccharide synthesis was occurring. The localized pattern of labeling attributed to active synthesis declines at aggregation and early conus formation. As the pseudoplasmodium makes the developmental transition from the conus to the culmination stages the localized pattern of [³H]fucose labeling was restricted to the prespore cells while the prestalk cells were devoid of label. Prespore vacuoles were not present at the onset of this transition and consequently [³H]fucose incorporation occurred in the cells prior to their differentiation into prespore cells. In contrast to cells composing earlier stages, mature spores exhibited [³H]fucose-containing substances at the cell surface. At appropriate stages certain cells actively synthesize slime and stalk sheath which were labeled with either [³H]fucose or [³H]glucosamine.Prestalk isolates were obtained by transecting migrating slugs. [³H]Fucose was incorporated within 10 min among the basal cells of the isolate in the localized pattern typically found in prespore cells. The incorporation of [³H]fucose occurred prior to prespore differentiation as certain preparations were devoid of prespore vacuoles. Prespore isolates differentiate prestalk cells which have lost the capacity to incorporate [³H]fucose. This investigation suggests that cell contacts and interactions may affect the incorporation of [³H]fucose.     

The control of chemotactic cell movement during Dictyostelium morphogenesis

Differential cell movement is an important mechanism in the development and morphogenesis of many organisms. In many cases there are indications that chemotaxis is a key mechanism controlling differential cell movement. This can be particularly well studied in the starvation-induced multicellular development of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Upon starvation, up to 10(5) individual amoebae aggregate to form a fruiting body The cells aggregate by chemotaxis in response to propagating waves of cAMP, initiated by an aggregation centre. During their chemotactic aggregation the cells start to differentiate into prestalk and prespore cells, precursors to the stalk and spores that form the fruiting body. These cells enter the aggregate in a random order but then sort out to form a simple axial pattern in the slug. Our experiments strongly suggest that the multicellular aggregates (mounds) and slugs are also organized by propagating cAMP waves and, furthermore, that cell-type-specific differences in signalling and chemotaxis result in cell sorting, slug formation and movement.     

A demonstration of pattern formation without positional information in Dictyostelium

Although positional information, conveyed by morphogen gradients, is a widely accepted way of forming patterns during development, an alternative method is conceivable, based on the intermingled differentiation of cells with different fates, followed by their sorting into discrete pattern elements. It has been proposed that Dictyostelium prestalk and prespore cells behave in this way at the mound stage of development. However, it has been difficult to conclusively demonstrate that they initially differentiate intermingled, because rapid cell movement within the mound makes it impossible to be sure where prestalk and prespore cells originate. We have taken a novel approach to address this problem by blocking cell movement at different stages in development, using the actin-depolymerizing drug, latrunculin-A. Prestalk and prespore cells differentiate with essentially normal efficiency and timing in such paralyzed structures. When movement is blocked sufficiently early, the major cell types all subsequently differentiate at scattered positions throughout the aggregate, and even in the streams leading into it. Our work strongly supports the idea that the prestalk/prespore pattern in Dictyostelium forms without positional information and demonstrate that latrunculin-A may provide a useful tool for the investigation of patterning in other organisms.     

Early Recognition of Prespore Differentiation in Dictyostelium discoideum and its Significance for Models on Pattern Formation

An electron microscopic study revealed that during aggregation the cytoplasm of a number of cells increases in electron density. Increased electron density is shown to be the consequence of cell shrinkage, which causes a closer packing of cytoplasmic components. Originally electron-dense cells are spread randomly over the aggregate. The anterior prestalk region of the slug is almost devoid of electron-dense cells. In the posterior prespore region, cells with varying degrees of electron density are intermixed with 15–20% electron-lucent cells. During culmination all cells of the prespore region become very electron dense. Besides introducing a new criterion to recognize prespore cells at an early stage of development, our data give further evidence that induction of prespore cell differentiation is not necessarily position dependent.     

Cell Sorting daring Pattern Formation in Dictyostelium

Formation of the prestalk-prespore pattern in Dictyostelium was investigated in slugs and submerged clumps of cells. Prestalk and prespore cells were identified by staining with vital dyes, which are shown to be stable cell markers. Dissociated slug cells reaggregate and form slugs that contain a prestalk-prespore pattern indistinguishable from the original pattern. The pattern forms by sorting out of stained prestalk cells from unstained prespore cells. Sorting also occurs in clumps of dissociated slug cells submerged in liquid or agar. A pattern arises in 2 h in which a central core of stained cells is surrounded by a periphery of unstained cells. Sorting appears to be due to differential chemotaxis of stained and unstained cells to cAMP since exogenous cAMP (>10⁻⁷ M) reverses the normal direction of sorting-out such that stained cells sort to the periphery of the clumps.
Isolated portions of slugs regenerate a new prestalk-prespore pattern. Posterior isolates regenerate a pattern within 2 h due to sorting of a population of vitally stained 'anterior-like' cells present in posteriors. Anterior-like cells do not sort in intact slugs due to the influence of a diffusible inhibitor secreted by the anterior region. During posterior regeneration this signal is absent and anterior-like cells rapidly acquire the ability to sort. Anterior isolates regenerate a staining pattern more slowly than posterior isolates by a process that requires conversion of stained prestalk cells to unstained prespore cells.
The results suggest that pattern formation in Dictyostelium consists of two processes: establishment of appropriate proportions of two cell types and establishment of the pattern itself by a mechanism of sorting-out.     

Folic acid stimulation of the Gα4 G protein-mediated signal transduction pathway inhibits anterior prestalk cell development in Dictyostelium

In Dictyostelium discoideum, several G proteins are known to mediate the transduction of signals that direct chemotactic movement and regulate developmental morphogenesis. The G protein alpha subunit encoded by the Galpha4 gene has been previously shown to be required for chemotactic responses to folic acid, proper developmental morphogenesis, and spore production. In this study, cells overexpressing the wild type Galpha4 gene, due to high copy gene dosage (Galpha4HC), were found to be defective in the ability to form the anterior prestalk cell region, express prespore- and prestalk-cell specific genes, and undergo spore formation. In chimeric organisms, Galpha4HC prespore cell-specific gene expression and spore production were rescued by the presence of wild-type cells, indicating that prespore cell development in Galpha4HC cells is limited by the absence of an intercellular signal. Transplanted wild-type tips were sufficient to rescue Galpha4HC prespore cell development, suggesting that the rescuing signal originates from the anterior prestalk cells. However, the deficiencies in prestalk-specific gene expression were not rescued in the chimeric organisms. Furthermore, Galpha4HC cells were localized to the prespore region of these chimeric organisms and completely excluded from the anterior prestalk region, suggesting that the Galpha4 subunit functions cell-autonomously to prevent anterior prestalk cell development. The presence of exogenous folic acid during vegetative growth and development delayed anterior prestalk cell development in wild-type but not galpha4 null mutant aggregates, indicating that folic acid can inhibit cell-type-specific differentiation by stimulation of the Galpha4-mediated signal transduction pathway. The results of this study suggest that Galpha4-mediated signals can regulate cell-type-specific differentiation by promoting prespore cell development and inhibiting anterior prestalk-cell development.     

Cellular and subcellular distribution of a cAMP-regulated prestalk protein and prespore protein in Dictyostelium discoideum: a study on the ontogeny of prestalk and prespore cells

We have analyzed a developmentally and spatially regulated prestalk-specific gene and a prespore-specific gene from Dictyostelium. The prestalk gene, pst-cathepsin, encodes a protein highly homologous to the lysosomal cysteine proteinases cathepsin H and cathepsin B. The prespore gene encodes a protein with some homology to the anti-bacterial toxin crambin and has been designated beejin. Using the lambda gtll system, we have made polyclonal antibodies directed against a portion of the protein encoded by pst-cathepsin and other antibodies directed against the beejin protein. Both antibodies stain single bands on Western blots. By immunofluorescence and Western blots, pst-cathepsin is not present in vegetative cells or developing cells during the first approximately 10 h of development. It then appears with a punctate distribution in a subset of developing cells. Beejin is detected only after approximately 15 h of development, also in a subset of cells. Pst-cathepsin is distributed in the anterior approximately 1/10 of migrating slugs and on the peripheral posterior surfaces of slugs. Beejin is distributed in the posterior region of slugs. Expression of both pst-cathepsin and beejin can be induced in subsets of isolated cultured cells by a combination of conditioned medium and extracellular cAMP in agreement with the regulation of the mRNAs encoding these proteins. We have used the antibodies as markers for cell type to examine the ontogeny and the spatial distribution of prestalk and prespore cells throughout multicellular development. Our findings suggest that prestalk cell differentiation is independent of position within the aggregate and that the spatial localization of prestalk cells within the multicellular aggregate arises from sorting of the prestalk cells after their induction. We have also found a class of cell in developing aggregates that contains neither the prestalk nor the prespore markers.     

Prespore cell fate bias in G1 phase of the cell cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum

By generating a population of Dictyostelium cells that are in the G1 phase of the cell cycle we have examined the influence of cell cycle status on cell fate specification, cell type proportioning and its regulation, and terminal differentiation. The lack of observable mitosis during the development of these cells and the quantification of their cellular DNA content suggests that they remain in G1 throughout development. Furthermore, chromosomal DNA synthesis was not detectable these cells, indicating that no synthesis phase had occurred, although substantial mitochondrial DNA synthesis did occur in prespore cells. The G1-phase cells underwent normal morphological development and sporulation but displayed an elevated prespore/prestalk ratio of 5.7 compared to the 3.0 (or 3:1) ratio normally observed in populations dominated by G2-phase cells. When migrating slugs produced by G1-phase cells were bisected, each half could reestablish the 5.7 (or 5.7:1) prespore/prestalk ratio. These results demonstrate that Dictyostelium cells can carry out the entire developmental cycle in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and that passage from G2 into G1 phase is not required for sporulation. Our results also suggest that the population asymmetry provided by the distribution of cells around the cell cycle at the time of starvation is not strictly required for cell type proportioning. Finally, when developed together with G2-phase cells, G1-phase cells preferentially become prespore cells and exclude G2-phase cells from the prespore-spore cell population, suggesting that G1-phase cells have an advantage over G2-phase cells in executing the spore cell differentiation pathway.     

The spatial form self-organization in the development of Dictyostelium discoideum

The emergence of the developmental axis within the early aggregate Dictyostelium discoideum is analyzed. Macroscopic parameters of physical continuum such as hydrostatic pressure and surface tension are applied to the cell mass. Cell chemotaxis, differential rate of attractant production by the prestalk and prespore cells and attractant diffusion are shown to be sufficient factors for the Dictyostelium slug morphogenesis.     

Expression of an activated rasD gene changes cell fate decisions during Dictyostelium development.

It has been previously demonstrated that the expression of an activated rasD gene in wild-type Dictyostelium cells results in formation of aggregates with multitips, instead of the normal single tips, and a block in further development. In an attempt to better understand the role of activated RasD development, we examined cell-type-specific gene expression in a strain stably expressing high levels of RasD[G12T]. We found that the expression of prestalk cell-specific genes ecmA and tagB was markedly enhanced, whereas the expression of the prespore cell-specific gene cotC was reduced to very low levels. When the fate of cells in the multitipped aggregate was monitored with an ecmA/lacZ fusion, it appeared that most of the cells eventually adopted prestalk gene expression characteristics. When mixtures of the [G12T]rasD cells and Ax3 cells were induced to differentiate, chimeric pseudoplasmodia were not formed. Thus, although the [G12T]rasD transformant had a marked propensity to form prestalk cells, it could not supply the prestalk cell population when mixed with wild-type cells. Both stalk and spore cell formation occurred in low cell density monolayers of the [G12T]rasD strain, suggesting that at least part of the inhibition of stalk and spore formation during multicellular development involved inhibitory cell interactions within the cell mass. Models for the possible role of rasD in development are discussed.     

Cross-induction of cell types in Dictyostelium: evidence that DIF-1 is made by prespore cells.

To investigate how cell type proportions are regulated during Dictyostelium development, we have attempted to find out which cell type produces DIF-1, a diffusible signal molecule inducing the differentiation of prestalk-O cells. DIF-1 is a chlorinated alkyl phenone that is synthesized from a C12 polyketide precursor by chlorination and methylation, with the final step catalysed by the dmtA methyltransferase. All our evidence points to the prespore cells as the major source of DIF-1. (1) dmtA mRNA and enzyme activity are greatly enriched in prespore compared with prestalk cells. The chlorinating activity is also somewhat prespore-enriched. (2) Expression of dmtA is induced by cyclic-AMP and this induction is inhibited by DIF-1. This regulatory behaviour is characteristic of prespore products. (3) Short-term labelling experiments, using the polyketide precursor, show that purified prespore cells produce DIF-1 at more than 20 times the rate of prestalk cells. (4) Although DIF-1 has little effect on its own synthesis in short-term labelling experiments, in long-term experiments, using 36Cl(-) as label, it is strongly inhibitory (IC(50) about 5 nM), presumably because it represses expression of dmtA; this is again consistent with DIF-1 production by prespore cells. Inhibition takes about 1 hour to become effective. We propose that prespore cells cross-induce the differentiation of prestalk-O cells by making DIF-1, and that this is one of the regulatory loops that sets the proportion of prespore-to-prestalk cells in the aggregate.