Somatic cell reprogramming for regenerative medicine: SCNT vs. iPS cells

Reprogramming of somatic cells to a pluripotent state holds huge potentials for regenerative medicine. However, a debate over which method is better, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) or induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, still persists. Both approaches have the potential to generate patient-specific pluripotent stem cells for replacement therapy. Yet, although SCNT has been successfully applied in various vertebrates, no human pluripotent stem cells have been generated by SCNT due to technical, legal and ethical difficulties. On the other hand, human iPS cell lines have been reported from both healthy and diseased individuals. A recent study reported the generation of triploid human pluripotent stem cells by transferring somatic nuclei into oocytes, a variant form of SCNT. In this essay, we discuss this progress and the potentials of these two reprogramming approaches for regenerative medicine.     

细胞重编程与表观遗传学调控

细胞重编程是生命科学研究的热点之一,目前体细胞核移植、细胞融合和特定转录因子诱导等方法都可以实现体外细胞重编程,而在细胞重编程过程中表观遗传学发挥关键的调控作用,因此对重编程过程中表观遗传学调控机制开展深入研究具有重要的意义。本文简要综述细胞重编程的研究现状和表观遗传学调控细胞重编程机制的研究进展,并对小分子化合物和microRNA提高细胞重编程效率的最新进展进行了介绍。     

The first reported generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) and iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes in the Netherlands

One of the recent breakthroughs in stem cell research has been the reprogramming of human somatic cells to an embryonic stem cell (ESC)-like state (induced pluripotent stem cells, iPS cells). Similar to ESCs, iPS cells can differentiate into derivatives of the three germ layers, for example cardiomyocytes, pancreatic cells or neurons. This technique offers a new approach to investigating disease pathogenesis and to the development of novel therapies. It may now be possible to generate iPS cells from somatic cells of patients who suffer from vascular genetic diseases, such as hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). The iPS cells will have a similar genotype to that of the patient and can be differentiated in vitro into the cell type(s) that are affected in the patient. Thus they will serve as excellent models for a better understanding of mechanisms underlying the disease. This, together with the ability to test new drugs, could potentially lead to novel therapeutic concepts in the near future. Here we report the first derivation of three human iPS cell lines from two healthy individuals and one HHT patient in the Netherlands. The iPS cells resembled ESCs in morphology and expressed typical ESC markers. In vitro, iPS cells could be differentiated into cells of the three germ layers, including beating cardiomyocytes and vascular cells. With this technique it will be possible to establish human cardiovascular disease models from patient biopsies provided by the principal hospitals in the Netherlands. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:51-4.)     

人诱导性多潜能干细胞(iPS细胞)系的建立

掌握建立人iPS细胞系(induced pluripotent stem cells,iPSCs)的技术,以便为人肿瘤细胞重编程为iPS细胞建立技术平台.在人胚胎干细胞的培养条件下,通过携带Oct4、Sox2、c-Myc、Klf44个混合因子的慢病毒感染人皮肤成纤维细胞(CCD-1079SK细胞),从而诱导成干细胞样的克隆.根据人胚胎干细胞的特性进行如下鉴定:克隆形态、碱性磷酸酶活性、核型和CCD-1079SK细胞来源的克隆拟胚体(embryoid bodies,EBs)形成及分化等.结果显示,在人胚胎干细胞的培养环境中,导入Oct4、Sox2、c-Myc、Klf44个因子的CCD-1079SK细胞产生了一株iPSC克隆,这株iPSC克隆在细胞形态、增殖能力、胚胎细胞特异性表面抗原以及基因表达与人胚胎干细胞相似,此外,iPSC克隆在体外悬浮培养中形成拟胚体并分化成3个胚层.人iPS细胞系的成功建立为利用iPS细胞技术开展肿瘤细胞重编程研究奠定了坚实基础.     

诱导性多潜能干细胞(iPS cells)——现状及前景展望

主要从 iPS细胞发展历程、获得 iPS细胞的几个关键步骤 (如基因导入方式、诱导 iPS细胞所需因子组合与小分子化合物运用和体细胞种类选择等)、病人或疾病特异性 iPS细胞、iPS细胞体内外诱导分化与其衍生物的临床应用和制备无遗传修饰的(genetic modification-free) iPS细胞的可行性与前景等方面对 iPS细胞最新研究进展做评述．日本和美国研究小组先后用4种基因将小鼠(2006年8月)和人(2007年11～12月)的体细胞在体外重编程为诱导性多潜能干细胞(induced pluripotent stem cells,iPS cells),此后在短短两年多时间内,iPS 细胞的研究和关注度呈爆炸式增长．体细胞重编程、去分化和多潜能干细胞来源等一系列热点问题再次成为干细胞和发育生物学等研究的热点和焦点．与胚胎干细胞(embryonic stem cells,ES cells)一样,iPS细胞在体内可分化为3个胚层来源的所有细胞,进而参与形成机体所有组织和器官．迄今,在体外已由 iPS细胞定向诱导分化出功能性的多种成熟细胞．因此,iPS细胞研究不仅具有重要理论意义,而且在再生医学、组织工程和药物发现与评价等方面极具应用价值．     

The tumourigenicity of iPS cells and their differentiated derivates

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) provides a promising seeding cell for regenerative medicine. However, iPSC has the potential to form teratomas after transplantation. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the tumorigenic risks of iPSC and all its differentiated derivates prior to use in a clinical setting. Here, murine iPSCs were transduced with dual reporter gene consisting of monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) and firefly luciferase (Fluc). Undifferentiated iPSCs, iPSC derivates from induced differentiation (iPSC‐derivates), iPSC‐derivated cardiomyocyte (iPSC‐CMs) were subcutaneously injected into the back of nude mice. Non‐invasive bioluminescence imaging (BLI) was longitudinally performed at day 1, 7, 14 and 28 after transplantation to track the survival and proliferation of transplanted cells. At day 28, mice were killed and grafts were explanted to detect teratoma formation. The results demonstrated that transplanted iPSCs, iPSC‐derivates and iPSC‐CMs survived in receipts. Both iPSCs and iPSC‐derivates proliferated dramatically after transplantation, while only slight increase in BLI signals was observed in iPSC‐CM transplanted mice. At day 28, teratomas were detected in both iPSCs and iPSC‐derivates transplanted mice, but not in iPSC‐CM transplanted ones. In vitro study showed the long‐term existence of pluripotent cells during iPSC differentiation. Furthermore, when these cells were passaged in feeder layers as undifferentiated iPSCs, they would recover iPSC‐like colonies, indicating the cause for differentiated iPSC's tumourigenicity. Our study indicates that exclusion of tumorigenic cells by screening in addition to lineage‐specific differentiation is necessary prior to therapeutic use of iPSCs.     

中国细胞重编程和多能干细胞研究进展

近几十年是干细胞领域飞速发展的重要时期。随着中国经济实力的发展壮大,科研实力也在稳步增强,干细胞研究领域达到了国际并跑甚至领跑的水平。本文从体细胞核移植、诱导多能干细胞、单倍体多能干细胞和胚胎早期发育研究4个方面,对中国细胞重编程和干细胞领域的研究进展进行了历史性回顾,总结了中国科学家在相关领域所取得的重要科研成果。随着单细胞测序技术的发展,各种发育过程将实现更为深入的解读,干细胞的临床应用在中国也会大放异彩。     

The applications of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells in drug development

The introduction of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells has been a milestone in the field of regenerative medicine and drug discovery. iPS cells can provide a continuous and individualized source of stem cells and are considered to hold great potential for economically feasible personalized stem cell therapy. Various diseases might potentially be cured by iPS cell-based therapy including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington disease, ischemic heart disease, diabetes and so on. Moreover, iPS cells derived from patients suffering from unique incurable diseases can be developed into patient- and disease-specific cell lines. These cells can be used as an effective approach to study the mechanisms of diseases, providing useful tools for drug discovery, development and evaluation. The development of suitable methods for the culture and expansion of iPS cells and their differentiated progenies make feasible modern drug discovery techniques such as high-throughput screening. Furthermore, iPS cells can be applied in the field of toxicological and pharmacokinetics tests. This review focuses on the applications of iPS cells in the field of pharmaceutical industry.     

Mechanism and methods to induce pluripotency

Pluripotent stem cells are able to self-renew indefinitely and differentiate into all types of cells in the body. They can thus be an inexhaustible source for future cell transplantation therapy to treat degenerative diseases which currently have no cure. However, non-autologous cells will cause immune rejection. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology can convert somatic cells to the pluripotent state, and therefore offers a solution to this problem. Since the first generation of iPSCs, there has been an explosion of relevant research, from which we have learned much about the genetic networks and epigenetic landscape of pluripotency, as well as how to manipulate genes, epigenetics, and microRNAs to obtain iPSCs. In this review, we focus on the mechanism of cellular reprogramming and current methods to induce pluripotency. We also highlight new problems emerging from iPSCs. Better understanding of the fundamental mechanisms underlying pluripotenty and refining the methodology of iPSC generation will have a significant impact on future development of regenerative medicine.     

Application of biomaterials to advance induced pluripotent stem cell research and therapy

Derived from any somatic cell type and possessing unlimited self-renewal and differentiation potential, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are poised to revolutionize stem cell biology and regenerative medicine research, bringing unprecedented opportunities for treating debilitating human diseases. To overcome the limitations associated with safety, efficiency, and scalability of traditional iPSC derivation, expansion, and differentiation protocols, biomaterials have recently been considered. Beyond addressing these limitations, the integration of biomaterials with existing iPSC culture platforms could offer additional opportunities to better probe the biology and control the behavior of iPSCs or their progeny in vitro and in vivo. Herein, we discuss the impact of biomaterials on the iPSC field, from derivation to tissue regeneration and modeling. Although still exploratory, we envision the emerging combination of biomaterials and iPSCs will be critical in the successful application of iPSCs and their progeny for research and clinical translation.     

Small molecule compound induces chromatin de-condensation and facilitates induced pluripotent stern cell generation

The revolutionary induced pturipotent stem celt （iPSC） technoLogy provides a new means for celt replacement therapies and drug screening. Small molecule compounds have been found extremely useful to improve the generation of iPSCs and understand the repro- gramming mechanism. Here we report the identification of a novel chemical, CYT296, which improves OSKM-mediated induction of iPSCs for 〉10 folds and enables efficient reprogramming with only Oct4 in combination with other small molecules. The derived iPSCs are genuinely pluripotent and support the development oftwo ＇All-iPSC＇ mice by tetraploid complementation. CYT296 profoundly impacts heterochromatin formation without affecting celt viability. MEFs treated with CYT296 exhibit de-condensed chromatin structure with markedly reduced loci containing heterochromatin protein 1α （HPIoL） and H3K9me3, which is very similar to the chromatin configuration in embryonic stem cells （ESCs）. Given that an open chromatin structure serves as a hallmark of pLuripotency and has to be acquired to fulfill reprogramming, we propose that CYT296 might facilitate this process by disrupting condensed chromatin, thereby creating a more favorable environment for reprogramming. In agreement of this idea, shRNA targeting HP1α also promotes the generation of iPSCs. Thus current findings not only provide a novel chemical for efficient iPSC induction, but also suggest a new approach to regulate somatic cell reprogramming by targeting chromatin de-condensation with small molecules.