Comparison of a monoclonal antibody-based capture/enrichment sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay with immunomagnetic bead separation for the detection of attachment effacement Escherichia coli O26 strains from cattle faeces

AIMS: A monoclonal antibody (Mab 2F3)-based sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (sELISA) format for the detection of Escherichia coli O26 that improves the sensitivity of the assay by combining enrichment with the capture stage has been developed. Culture of the enriched contents of wells before completion of the sELISA was compared with immunomagnetic bead separation (IMS) as a means of specific isolation of the target organism. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bovine faecal samples, c. 10% in buffered peptone water (BPW), were pre-enriched for 6 h before testing by capture/enrichment sELISA and by IMS. The sELISA consisted of a 1-2 h capture stage followed by addition of BPW to the wells and an overnight enrichment stage before completion of the assay. The capture/enrichment stage of the assay was repeated a second time on the enriched contents removed from the wells before completion of the first sELISA. From 204 cattle faeces samples, 30x O26 strains [20x attachment effacement Escherichia coli (AEEC) and 10x non-AEEC] were isolated from the enriched wells of the sELISA, in comparison with 11 (9x AEEC and 2x non-AEEC) that were isolated by IMS. Examination of the use of enterohaemolysin activity and rhamnose utilization on 1% rhamnose McConkey's (RMAC) agar with or without cefixime and potassium tellurite demonstrated that the selection based on enterohaemolysin production and growth on RMAC with cefixime and potassium tellurite would largely differentiate the AEEC strains from the non-AEEC strains. CONCLUSIONS: The capture/enrichment sELISA protocol used compared favourably with the IMS for the isolation of E. coli O26 from faeces samples. The ELISA optical density readings obtained in the procedure were used as a screening indicator for selection of samples for further culture examination, and the selective culture methods examined to assist strain isolation did have potential. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The capture/enrichment format of an Mab-based sELISA protocol has the potential to provide a suitable screening assay for the specific detection of pathogenic strains from mixed culture samples like faeces.     

Development of a monoclonal sandwich ELISA for the detection of animal and human Escherichia coli O157 strains

AIMS: Production of a monoclonal antibody (MAb) to Escherichia coli O157 to develop a rapid test using a sandwich ELISA (sELISA) format. METHODS AND RESULTS: A MAb (7A6) was developed to the long-chain lipopolysaccharide of E. coli O157. A sELISA developed with the MAb reacted with 28 bovine and seven human enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) O157 strains and also with two enterotoxigenic E. coli O157 strains. Cross-reaction to a rabbit diarrhoeal E.coli O15, Citrobacter freundii, Salmonella urbana and Vibrio cholerae O1 Inaba was detected. CONCLUSION: A MAb-based sELISA to detect E. coli O157 was produced. Its application to field samples is required to fully determine its prospective use for the detection of EHEC O157, to evaluate the non-specific interference of the cross-reacting strains. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The assay produced is not wholly specific to EHEC O157, but has the potential to be used as a rapid method for screening large numbers of samples for E. coli O157.     

A comparison of a monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA and immunomagnetic bead selective enrichment for the detection of Escherichia coli O157 from bovine faeces

AIMS: To compare a recently developed monoclonal antibody (MAb) based sandwich ELISA (sELISA) with an immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method for the detection of Escherichia coli O157 in bovine faeces. METHODS AND RESULTS: Faecal samples from 345 cattle were obtained from eight farms in Northern Ireland, in which human disease due to E. coli O157 had occurred. Both assays detected E. coli O157 on five of the farms and the phage-type of the majority of the bovine strains were the same as the corresponding human isolates. Similar numbers of the organism were detected by the two methods, 59 by the sELISA and 53 by the IMS procedure, 39 of the positive samples being common to both. Twenty samples were sELISA positive/IMS negative. CONCLUSIONS: If the IMS is regarded as the gold standard, then the sELISA is less sensitive and less specific, but under the conditions used sELISA positive results were obtained from all positive farms, and the sELISA gave a presumptive positive a day earlier than the IMS method. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The sELISA has the potential to be used as a rapid method for screening large numbers of samples for E. coli O157, but further work is required to determine its specificity.     

Sensitivity of an immunomagnetic-separation-based test for detecting Escherichia coli O26 in bovine feces

The sensitivity of a test for cattle shedding Escherichia coli serogroup O26 was estimated using several fecal pats artificially inoculated at a range of concentrations with different E. coli O26 strains. The test involves the enrichment of fecal microflora in buffered peptone water, the selective concentration of E. coli O26 using antibody-coated immunomagnetic-separation beads, the identification of E. coli colonies on Chromocult tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar, and confirmation of the serogroup with E. coli serogroup O26-specific antisera using slide agglutination. The effective dose of E. coli O26 for an 80% test sensitivity (ED(80)) was 1.0 x 10(4) CFU g(-1) feces (95% confidence interval, 4.7 x 10(3) to 2.4 x 10(4)). Differences in test sensitivity between different E. coli O26 strains and fecal pats were also observed. Individual estimates of ED(80) for each strain and fecal pat combination ranged from 4.2 x 10(2) to 4.8 x 10(5) CFU g(-1). These results suggest that the test is useful for identifying individuals shedding a large number of E. coli O26 organisms or, if an appropriate number of individuals in a herd are sampled, for identifying affected herds. The study also provides a benchmark estimate of sensitivity that can be used to compare alternative tests for E. coli O26 and a methodological approach that can be applied to tests for other pathogenic members of the Enterobacteriaceae and other sample types.     

Development of an enzyme-labeled oligonucleotide probe for detecting the Escherichia coli attaching and effacing A gene.

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) can produce attaching and effacing (AE) lesions on intestinal epithelium in vitro and in vivo. A gene necessary to cause the AE lesion has been identified and designated Escherichia coli attaching and effacing A (eaeA) gene. In this study, an alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-conjugated oligonucleotide probe for the eaeA gene was developed and used to detect the eaeA gene among 163 strains of classical EPEC and 25 strains of EHEC O157. The prevalence rates of eaeA gene in the strains of classical EPEC and EHEC O157 were 51.5 and 100%, respectively. The eaeA-positive rate (60.0%) in strains of class I EPEC serogroups (O26, O55, O86, O111, O119, O125, O126, O127, O128ab, and O142) was significantly higher than that (22.9%) in strains of the class II EPEC serogroups (O18, O44, O114) (P<0.01). A total of 109 eaeA-positive classical EPEC and EHEC O157 were positive for fluorescent actin staining (FAS) assay, whereas 79 eaeA-negative classical EPEC were negative. Both the sensitivity and specificity of the eaeA probe versus the FAS assay positivity were 100%. Thus, use of the ALP-conjugated oligonucleotide probe for the eaeA gene would be specific and reliable in identifying the adherence capability of EPEC and EHEC.     

Comparison between a bovine and a human enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli strain of serogroup O26 by suppressive subtractive hybridization reveals the presence of atypical factors in EHEC and EPEC strains

Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) strains are responsible for food poisoning in humans in developed countries via consumption of vegetal and animal foodstuffs contaminated by ruminant feces. The clinical conditions caused by EHEC strains vary from undifferentiated diarrhea to hemorrhagic colitis with, in a few cases, the appearance of the hemolytic uremic syndrome, which can lead to death. Most EHEC strains can be found in the gut of healthy ruminants, but some of the strains, belonging to O26, O111, O118 serogroups, for example, are also responsible for digestive disorders in calves. The aim of this research was to study the genomic differences between two EHEC strains of serogroup O26 isolated from a young calf and a human with diarrhea, to identify specific sequences of the bovine strain that could be implicated in initial adherence or host specificity. No sequence implicated in host specificity was found during our study. Finally, several factors, not usually present in EHEC strains of serogroup O26, were identified in the bovine strain. One of them, the PAI I(CL3) locus initially presented as a marker for LEE-negative VTEC strains, was found in 11.3% of EPEC and EHEC strains.     

Isolation and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) from calves and lambs with diarrhoea in India

AIMS: To determine the prevalence and molecular characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) in calves and lambs with diarrhoea in India. METHODS AND RESULTS: Faecal samples originating from 391 calves and 101 lambs which had diarrhoea were screened for presence of E. coli. A total number of 309 (249 bovine and 60 ovine) E. coli strains were isolated. A total of 113 bovine and 15 ovine strains were subjected to multiplex polymerase chain reaction (m-PCR) for detection of stx1, stx2, eaeA and EHEC hlyA genes. STEC and EPEC belonging to different serogpoups were detected in 9.73% of calves studied. Six per cent and 26.66% of lambs studied were carrying STEC and EPEC, respectively. Majority of the STEC serogroups isolated in this study did not belong to those which have been identified earlier to be associated mainly with diarrhoea and enteritis in cattle and sheep outside India. The most frequent serogroup among bovine and ovine EPEC was O26 (40%). One of the most important STEC serogroup O157, known for certain life-threatening infections in humans, was isolated from both bovine and ovine faecal samples. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of STEC and EPEC belonging to different serogroups are prevalent in calves and lambs with diarrhoea in India and could be the cause of disease in them. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The study reports, for the first time, the isolation and characterization of STEC and EPEC serogroups associated with diarrhoea in calves and lambs in India. Many STEC and EPEC strains belonged to serogoups known for certain life-threatening diseases in humans.     

Bovine feces from animals with gastrointestinal infections are a source of serologically diverse atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli strains that commonly possess intimin

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) cells were isolated from 191 fecal samples from cattle with gastrointestinal infections (diagnostic samples) collected in New South Wales, Australia. By using a multiplex PCR, E. coli cells possessing combinations of stx1, stx2, eae, and ehxA were detected by a combination of direct culture and enrichment in E. coli (EC) (modified) broth followed by plating on vancomycin-cefixime-cefsulodin blood (BVCC) agar for the presence of enterohemolytic colonies and on sorbitol MacConkey agar for the presence of non-sorbitol-fermenting colonies. The high prevalence of the intimin gene eae was a feature of the STEC (35 [29.2%] of 120 isolates) and contrasted with the low prevalence (9 [0.5%] of 1,692 fecal samples possessed STEC with eae) of this gene among STEC recovered during extensive sampling of feces from healthy slaughter-age cattle in Australia (M. Hornitzky, B. A. Vanselow, K. Walker, K. A. Bettelheim, B. Corney, P. Gill, G. Bailey, and S. P. Djordjevic, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:6439-6445, 2002). Forty-seven STEC serotypes were identified, including O5:H-, O8:H19, O26:H-, O26:H11, O113:H21, O157:H7, O157:H- and Ont:H- which are known to cause severe disease in humans and 23 previously unreported STEC serotypes. Serotypes Ont:H- and O113:H21 represented the two most frequently isolated STEC isolates and were cultured from nine (4.7%) and seven (3.7%) animals, respectively. Fifteen eae-positive E. coli serotypes, considered to represent atypical EPEC, were identified, with O111:H- representing the most prevalent. Using both techniques, STEC cells were cultured from 69 (36.1%) samples and EPEC cells were cultured from 30 (15.7%) samples, including 9 (4.7%) samples which yielded both STEC and EPEC. Culture on BVCC agar following enrichment in EC (modified) broth was the most successful method for the isolation of STEC (24.1% of samples), and direct culture on BVCC agar was the most successful method for the isolation of EPEC (14.1% samples). These studies show that diarrheagenic calves and cattle represent important reservoirs of eae-positive E. coli.     

Genetic relationship of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli pathotypes among the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O serogroup

The genetic relationship among the Escherichia coli pathotypes was investigated. We used random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) data for constructing a dendrogram of 73 strains of diarrheagenic E. coli. A phylogenetic tree encompassing 15 serotypes from different pathotypes was constructed using multilocus sequence typing data. Phylogram clusters were used for validating RAPD data on the clonality of enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) O serogroup strains. Both analyses showed very similar topologies, characterized by the presence of two major groups: group A includes EPEC H6 and H34 strains and group B contains the other EPEC strains plus all serotypes belonging to atypical EPEC, enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). These results confirm the existence of two evolutionary divergent groups in EPEC: one is genetically and serologically very homogeneous whereas the other harbors EPEC and non-EPEC serotypes. The same situation was found for EAEC and EHEC.     

Characterization of two major groups of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli O26 strains which are globally spread in human patients and domestic animals of different species

Twenty-three Escherichia coli O26 strains from humans, cattle, sheep, pigs and chicken were investigated for virulence markers and for genetic similarity by pulsed field gel electrophoresis and multi locus sequence typing. Two groups of genetically closely related O26 strains were defined. One group is formed by enteropathogenic (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) E. coli strains, which do not ferment rhamnose and dulcitol and most of these carry a plasmid encoding enterohemolysin. The other group consists of rhamnose and dulcitol fermenting EPEC strains, which carry plasmids encoding alpha-hemolysin. Multiple species of domestic animals were shown to serve as a reservoir for human pathogenic O26 EPEC and EHEC strains.     

Identification of genetic markers for differentiation of Shiga toxin-producing, enteropathogenic, and avirulent strains of Escherichia coli O26

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O26 is one of the top five enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) O groups most often associated with hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) worldwide. STEC O26 is considered to have evolved from enteropathogenic (EPEC) O26 strains through the acquisition of Shiga toxin (Stx)-encoding genes. Our PCR data identified several STEC-like strains expressing all features of STEC except Stx production and carrying remnants of Stx phages that were probably derivatives of EHEC O26. EHEC and EPEC O26 strains phenotypically resemble O26 EHEC-like and apathogenic E. coli O26 strains and are therefore undistinguishable by cultural methods. A clear discrimination between the different O26 groups is required for diagnostics in patients and for control of food safety. To develop an assay for specific detection of EHEC and EHEC-like O26 strains, we used a high-throughput PCR approach for selection of discriminative genetic markers among 33 tested genes mostly encoding type III secretion system effector proteins. The genes ECs1822, nleH1-2, nleA, nleC, nleH1-1, nleG, nleG2, nleG6-1, nleG6-2, espJ, espM2, nleG8-2, espG, ent (or espL2), nleB, nleE, efa1, and espB were detected at different frequencies in O26 EHEC, EHEC-like, and EPEC strains, indicating the possible role of these genes in virulence of human pathogenic O26 strains. The espK and espN genes were detected only in EHEC and EHEC-like O26 strains. espK was present in 99.14% of EHEC and 91.14% of EHEC-like O26 strains and was hence the best candidate as a genetic marker for characterizing these pathogroups. These data were corroborated by a genotyping real-time PCR test based on allelic discrimination of the arcA (aerobic respiratory control protein A) gene. The results indicate that a combination of molecular detection tools for O26 wzx (wzx(O26)), eae-beta, stx, espK, and arcA genotyping is highly discriminative for clear identification of EHEC and EHEC-like E. coli O26 strains. This simple diagnostic test might be applicable in hospital service laboratories or public health laboratories to test strains isolated from stools of patients suffering from diarrhea.     

Serotypes and virutypes of enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli strains from stool samples of children with diarrhoea in Germany

Aims: To investigate the prevalence of traditional and emerging types of enteropathogenic (EPEC) and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) strains in stool samples from children with diarrhoea and to characterize their virulence genes involved in the attaching and effacing (A/E) phenotype. Methods and Results: Serological and PCR‐based methods were used for detection and isolation of EPEC and EHEC strains from 861 stool samples from diarrhoeic children. Agglutination with traditional EPEC and EHEC O‐group‐specific antisera resulted in detection of 38 strains; 26 of these carried virulence factors of EPEC or EHEC. PCR screening for the eae gene resulted in isolation of 97 strains, five carried genes encoding Shiga toxins (stx), one carried the bfpA gene and 91 were atypical EPEC. The 97 EPEC and EHEC strains were divided into 36 O‐serogroups and 21 H‐types, only nine strains belonged to the traditional EPEC O‐groups O26, O55, O86 and O128. In contrast, EPEC serotypes O28:H28, O51:H49, O115:H38 and O127:H40 were found in multiple cases. Subtyping the virulence factors intimin, Tir and Tir‐cytoskeleton coupling effector protein (TccP)/TccP2 resulted in further classification of 93·8% of the 97 strains. Conclusions: Our findings show a clear advantage of the eae‐PCR over the serological detection method for identification of EPEC and EHEC strains from human patients. Significance and Impact of the Study: Molecular detection by the eae‐PCR followed by serotyping and virutyping is useful for monitoring trends in EPEC and EHEC infections and to discover their possible reservoirs.     

Prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in children with diarrhea in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

We report the frequency of the different diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) categories isolated from children with acute endemic diarrhea in Salvador, Bahia. The E. coli isolates were investigated by colony blot hybridization with the following genes probes: eae, EAF, bfpA, Stx1, Stx2, ST-Ih, ST-Ip, LT-I, LT-II, INV, and EAEC, as virulence markers to distinguish typical and atypical EPEC, EHEC/STEC, ETEC, EIEC, and EAEC. Seven of the eight categories of DEC were detected. The most frequently isolated was atypical EPEC (10.1%) followed by ETEC (7.5%), and EAEC (4.2%). EHEC, STEC, EIEC, and typical EPEC were each detected once. The strains of ETEC, EAEC, and atypical EPEC belonged to a wide variety of serotypes. The serotypes of the others categories were O26:H11 (EHEC), O21:H21 (STEC), O142:H34 (typical EPEC), and O:H55 (EIEC). We also present the clinical manifestations and other pathogenic species observed in children with DEC. This is the first report of EHEC and STEC in Salvador, and one of the first in Brazil.     

Presence of virulence and fitness gene modules of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O26

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) strains of serogroup O26 cause hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) whereas atypical enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC) O26 typically cause uncomplicated diarrhea but have been also isolated from HUS patients. To gain insight into the virulence of aEPEC O26, we compared the presence of O island (OI) 122, which is associated with enhanced virulence in EHEC strains, among aEPEC O26 and EHEC O26 clinical isolates. We also tested these strains for the high pathogenicity island (HPI) which is a fitness island. All 20 aEPEC O26 and 20 EHEC O26 investigated contained virulence genes located within OI-122 (efa1/lifA, nleB, nleE, ent). In both aEPEC O26 and EHEC O26, OI-122 was linked to the locus for enterocyte effacement, forming a mosaic island which was integrated in pheU. Moreover, strains of these two pathotypes shared a conserved HPI. These data support a close relatedness between aEPEC O26 and EHEC O26 and have evolutionary implications. The presence of OI-122 in aEPEC O26 might contribute to their pathogenic potential.     

Evaluation of the 'GeneDisc' real-time PCR system for detection of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O26, O103, O111, O145 and O157 strains according to their virulence markers and their O- and H-antigen-associated genes

Aims:  To evaluate the GeneDisc multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O26, O103, O111, O145 and O157 strains.
Methods and Results:  GeneDiscs for detection of genes encoding Shiga toxins ( stx ), intimins ( eae ), E. coli O157 ( rfbE _O157) and H7 ( fliC _H7) antigens as well as genes specific for EHEC O26 ( wzx _O26), O103 ( wzx _O103), O111 ( wbd1 _O111), O145 ( ihp1 _O145) and O157 ( ihp1 _O157) were evaluated. The assay was run with native bacteria in 1 h in a GeneDisc Cycler. All genotypes of stx and eae , except stx _2f and eae -rho, were identified. Escherichia coli strains belonging to O-groups O26, O103, O111, O157 as well as EHEC O145:[H28] strains were specifically detected with this assay. The ihp1 _O157 gene was not found specific for EHEC O157. O-rough mutants of EHEC and non-motile EHEC O157 strains were reliably identified with the GeneDisc assay. Two to three colonies of EHEC strains were still detectable in a lawn of 50 000 apathogenic E. coli from agar plates.
Conclusions:  The GeneDisc assay is a specific and reliable assay for detection of major EHEC strains. It is robust enough to detect few EHEC colonies in mixed cultures of bacteria.
Significance and Impact of the Study:  The assay is promising for its use in EHEC diagnostics and for EHEC monitoring with different kinds of samples.     

多重PCR方法快速检测4种主要致腹泻性大肠埃希菌

肠毒素性大肠埃希菌(ETEC)、肠致病性大肠埃希菌(EPEC)、肠出血性大肠埃希菌(EHEC)和侵袭性大肠埃希菌(EIEC)是引起腹泻的主要大肠埃希菌,威胁着食品安全和人类健康,建立同时检测4种致腹泻性大肠埃希菌的方法具有重要意义。基于ETEC LT肠毒素基因、EPEC bfpA基因、EHECO抗原基因和EIEC侵袭性质粒特异性基因,设计了4对特异性引物,通过对单一PCR反应条件的优化建立了快速检测4种主要致腹泻性大肠埃希菌的多重PCR方法,彼此之间无交叉反应。该多重PCR方法具有良好的特异性和灵敏性,对24株致病菌进行检测,所试4株致腹泻性大肠埃希菌均为PCR阳性,其他菌株则为阴性。实践证明,利用所建立的多重PCR方法对124份肉类、奶类制品及人工污染样品等进行检测,检出15份阳性,与国标(GB4789.6-1994)检测结果相同。结果表明本文建立的多重PCR方法可用于ETEC、EPEC、EHEC和EIEC的单一或混合感染的鉴别诊断及食品安全风险评估,具有良好的实用性。     

Detection of LEE 4 Region-Encoded Genes from Different Enteropathogenic and Enterohemorrhagic <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> Serotypes

The LEE 4 genes sepL, espA, espD, espB, and espF were detected in 50 strains of typical and atypical enteropathogenic (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) Escherichia coli by PCR. sepL was amplified in 90%, espA in 94%, espB in 50%, espD in 40%, and espF in 78% of all strains, employing prototype EPEC-based primers. With O26:H^–-based primers, espB was detected in all O26 strains, and O157:H7-specific primers amplified espD and espB among all O55:H7 and O157:H7 strains. Our results indicated that espA and sepL should be more conserved between different EPEC and EHEC serotypes, while espB, espD, and espF should be more diverse. Apparently this variation is related to serogroup or serotype, but sequencing assays are necessary to confirm such conservation/diversity and their association with serogroup or serotype. Secreted protein analyses of espA, espD, and espB PCR-negative strains demonstrated that their encoded proteins present distinct immunological types, reflecting the genetic variability of those genes.     

Draft genome sequences of six Escherichia coli isolates from the stepwise model of emergence of Escherichia coli O157:H7

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) of serotype O157:H7 has been implicated in food-borne illnesses worldwide. An evolutionary model was proposed in which the highly pathogenic EHEC O157:H7 serotype arose from its ancestor, enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) O55:H7 (sorbitol fermenting [SOR(+)] and β-glucuronidase positive [GUD(+)]), through sequential gain of virulence, phenotypic traits, and serotype change. Here we report six draft genomes of strains belonging to this evolutionary model: two EPEC O55:H7 (SOR(+) GUD(+)) strains, two nonmotile EHEC O157:H(-) strains (SOR(+) GUD(+)) containing plasmid pSFO157, one EHEC O157:H7 (SOR(-) GUD(+)) strain, and one O157:H7 strain containing plasmid pSFO157 (SOR(+) GUD(+)).     

Rapid procedure for detecting enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in food.

A sensitive, specific procedure was developed for detecting Escherichia coli O157:H7 in food in less than 20 h. The procedure involves enrichment of 25 g of food in 225 ml of a selective enrichment medium for 16 to 18 h at 37 degrees C with agitation (150 rpm). The enrichment culture is applied to a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a polyclonal antibody specific for E. coli O157 antigen as the capture antibody and a monoclonal antibody specific for enterohemorrhagic E. coli of serotypes O157:H7 and O26:H11 as the detection antibody. The ELISA can be completed within 3 h. The sensitivity of the procedure, determined by using E. coli O157:H7-inoculated ground beef and dairy products, including different varieties of cheese, was 0.2 to 0.9 cell per g of food. A survey of retail fresh ground beef and farm raw milk samples with this procedure revealed that 3 (2.8%) of 107 ground beef samples and 11 (10%) of 115 raw milk samples were positive for E. coli O157:H7. Most-probable-number determinations revealed E. coli O157:H7 populations of 0.4 to 1.5 cells per g in the three ground beef samples. In addition to being highly specific, sensitive, and rapid, this procedure is easy to perform and is amenable to use by laboratories performing routine microbiological testing.     

Rapid procedure for detecting enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in food.

A sensitive, specific procedure was developed for detecting Escherichia coli O157:H7 in food in less than 20 h. The procedure involves enrichment of 25 g of food in 225 ml of a selective enrichment medium for 16 to 18 h at 37 degrees C with agitation (150 rpm). The enrichment culture is applied to a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a polyclonal antibody specific for E. coli O157 antigen as the capture antibody and a monoclonal antibody specific for enterohemorrhagic E. coli of serotypes O157:H7 and O26:H11 as the detection antibody. The ELISA can be completed within 3 h. The sensitivity of the procedure, determined by using E. coli O157:H7-inoculated ground beef and dairy products, including different varieties of cheese, was 0.2 to 0.9 cell per g of food. A survey of retail fresh ground beef and farm raw milk samples with this procedure revealed that 3 (2.8%) of 107 ground beef samples and 11 (10%) of 115 raw milk samples were positive for E. coli O157:H7. Most-probable-number determinations revealed E. coli O157:H7 populations of 0.4 to 1.5 cells per g in the three ground beef samples. In addition to being highly specific, sensitive, and rapid, this procedure is easy to perform and is amenable to use by laboratories performing routine microbiological testing.