首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
Lateral root (LR) formation is important for the establishment of root architecture in higher plants. Recent studies have revealed that LR formation is regulated by an auxin signaling pathway that depends on auxin response factors ARF7 and ARF19, and auxin/indole‐3‐acetic acid (Aux/IAA) proteins including SOLITARY‐ROOT (SLR)/IAA14. To understand the molecular mechanisms of LR formation, we isolated a recessive mutant rlf (reduced lateral root formation) in Arabidopsis thaliana. The rlf‐1 mutant showed reduction of not only emerged LRs but also LR primordia. Analyses using cell‐cycle markers indicated that the rlf‐1 mutation inhibits the first pericycle cell divisions involved in LR initiation. The rlf‐1 mutation did not affect auxin‐induced root growth inhibition but did affect LR formation over a wide range of auxin concentrations. However, the rlf‐1 mutation had almost no effect on auxin‐inducible expression of LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES‐DOMAIN16/ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2‐LIKE18 (LBD16/ASL18) and LBD29/ASL16 genes, which are downstream targets of ARF7/19 for LR formation. These results indicate that ARF7/19‐mediated auxin signaling is not blocked by the rlf‐1 mutation. We found that the RLF gene encodes At5g09680, a protein with a cytochrome b5‐like heme/steroid binding domain. RLF is ubiquitously expressed in almost all organs, and the protein localizes in the cytosol. These results, together with analysis of the genetic interaction between the rlf‐1 and arf7/19 mutations, indicate that RLF is a cytosolic protein that positively controls the early cell divisions involved in LR initiation, independent of ARF7/19‐mediated auxin signaling.  相似文献   

4.
The LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES DOMAIN/ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2-LIKE (LBD/ASL) genes encode proteins harboring a conserved amino acid domain, referred to as the LOB (for lateral organ boundaries) domain. While recent studies have revealed developmental functions of some LBD genes in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and in crop plants, the biological functions of many other LBD genes remain to be determined. In this study, we have demonstrated that the lbd18 mutant evidenced a reduced number of lateral roots and that lbd16 lbd18 double mutants exhibited a dramatic reduction in the number of lateral roots compared with lbd16 or lbd18. Consistent with this observation, significant β-glucuronidase (GUS) expression in ProLBD18:GUS seedlings was detected in lateral root primordia as well as in the emerged lateral roots. Whereas the numbers of primordia of lbd16, lbd18, and lbd16 lbd18 mutants were similar to those observed in the wild type, the numbers of emerged lateral roots of lbd16 and lbd18 single mutants were reduced significantly. lbd16 lbd18 double mutants exhibited additively reduced numbers of emerged lateral roots compared with single mutants. This finding indicates that LBD16 and LBD18 may function in the initiation and emergence of lateral root formation via a different pathway. LBD18 was shown to be localized into the nucleus. We determined whether LBD18 functions in the nucleus using a steroid regulator-inducible system in which the nuclear translocation of LBD18 can be regulated by dexamethasone in the wild-type, lbd18, and lbd16 lbd18 backgrounds. Whereas LBD18 overexpression in the wild-type background induced lateral root formation to some degree, other lines manifested the growth-inhibition phenotype. However, LBD18 overexpression rescued lateral root formation in lbd18 and lbd16 lbd18 mutants without inducing any other phenotypes. Furthermore, we demonstrated that LBD18 overexpression can stimulate lateral root formation in auxin response factor7/19 (arf7 arf19) mutants with blocked lateral root formation. Taken together, our results suggest that LBD18 functions in the initiation and emergence of lateral roots, in conjunction with LBD16, downstream of ARF7 and ARF19.The LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES DOMAIN/ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2-LIKE (LBD/ASL) genes (hereafter referred to as LBD) encode proteins harboring a LOB (for lateral organ boundaries) domain, which is a conserved amino acid domain that is detected only in plants, indicative of its function in plant-specific processes (Iwakawa et al., 2002; Shuai et al., 2002). There are 42 Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) LBD genes, which have been assigned to two classes. Class I comprises 36 genes and class II comprises six genes (Iwakawa et al., 2002; Shuai et al., 2002). The class I proteins harbor LOB domains similar to those observed in the LOB protein, whereas the class II proteins are less similar to the class I proteins, which include the LOB domain as well as regions outside of the LOB domain. The LOB domain is approximately 100 amino acids in length and harbors a conserved 4-Cys motif with CX2CX6CX3C spacing, a Gly-Ala-Ser block, and a predicted coiled-coil motif with LX6LX3LX6L spacing, reminiscent of the Leu zipper found in the majority of class I proteins (Shuai et al., 2002). None of the class II proteins were predicted to form coiled-coil structures.Although we currently understand very little about the biological roles of the LBD genes, there have been some reports describing the developmental functions of LBD genes in Arabidopsis on the basis of gain-of-function studies. The gain-of-function mutants of LBD36/ASL1, designated downwards siliques1, showed shorter internodes and downward lateral organs such as flowers (Chalfun-Junior et al., 2005). Although the lbd36 loss-of-function mutants did not show morphological phenotypes, the analysis of lbd36 as2 double mutants showed that these two members act redundantly to control cell fate determination in the petals. Another Arabidopsis gain-of-function mutant, jagged lateral organs-D (jlo-D), generates strongly lobed leaves and the shoot apical meristem prematurely arrests organ initiation, terminating in a pin-like structure (Borghi et al., 2007). During embryogenesis, JLO (=LBD30/ASL19) is necessary for the initiation of cotyledons and development beyond the globular stage. The results of misexpression experiments indicate that during postembryonic development, JLO function is required for the initiation of plant lateral organs. A recent study showed that the LOB domain of AS2 cannot be functionally replaced by those of other members of the LOB family, indicating that dissimilar amino acid residues in the LOB domains are important for characteristic functions of the family members (Matsumura et al., 2009).Thirty-five LBD genes in rice (Oryza sativa) have been identified from the genome sequences of the two rice subspecies, a japonica rice (Nippobare) and an indica rice (9311; Yang et al., 2006). Analyses of rice mutants have provided evidence of the involvement of a variety of rice LBD genes in lateral organ development. CROWN ROOTLESS1 (CRL1), encoding a LBD protein, is crucial for crown root formation in rice (Inukai et al., 2005). The crl1 mutant showed auxin-related phenotypes, such as decreased lateral root number, auxin insensitivity in lateral root formation, and impaired root gravitropism. A rice AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) appears to directly regulate CRL1 expression in the auxin signaling pathway (Inukai et al., 2005). ADVENTITIOUS ROOTLESS1 encodes an auxin-responsive protein with a LOB domain that controls the initiation of adventitious root primordia in rice and turned out to be the same gene as CRL1 (Liu et al., 2005).Lateral roots of Arabidopsis are derived from a subset of the pericycle cells (pericycle founder cells), which are positioned at the xylem poles within the parent root tissues (Casimiro et al., 2003). The mature pericycle cells dedifferentiate to form lateral root primordium (LRP), which undergoes consistent anticlinal and periclinal cell divisions to generate a highly organized LRP (Malamy and Benfey, 1997). The LRP emerges from the parent root via cell expansion, and the activation of the lateral root meristem results in continued growth of the organized lateral root. A growing body of physiological and genetic evidence has been collected to suggest that auxin plays a profound role in lateral root formation. For example, many auxin-related mutants have been shown to affect lateral root formation (Casimiro et al., 2003). Lateral root formation in Arabidopsis was shown to be regulated by ARF7 and ARF19 via the direct activation of LBD16 and LBD29/ASL16 (Okushima et al., 2007). Overexpression of LBD16 and LBD29 induced lateral root formation in the absence of ARF7 and ARF19, and the dominant repression of LBD16 inhibited lateral root formation, thus suggesting that these LBDs function downstream of ARF7- and ARF19-mediated auxin signaling during lateral root formation. The results of selection and binding assays demonstrated that a truncated LOB protein harboring only the conserved LOB domain can preferentially bind to unique DNA sequences, which is indicative of a DNA-binding protein (Husbands et al., 2007). Recently, LBD18 was shown to regulate tracheary element differentiation (Soyano et al., 2008).In this study, we demonstrated that LBD18 is involved in the regulation of lateral root formation, based on the analysis of loss-of-function mutants and the complementation of lbd18 and lbd16 lbd18 mutants by dexamethasone (DEX)-inducible LBD18 expression. Double mutations in LBD16 and LBD18 resulted in a synergistic reduction in the number of lateral roots, particularly in initiation and emergence, compared with either the lbd16 or lbd18 single mutant. This finding is suggestive of a combinatorial interaction of LBD16 and LBD18 in the process of lateral root formation. LBD18 expression in arf7 and arf19 mutants by the DEX-inducible system increased the number of lateral roots, thus demonstrating that LBD18 functions downstream of ARF7 and ARF19 in lateral root formation.  相似文献   

5.
6.
7.
8.
Feng Z  Zhu J  Du X  Cui X 《Planta》2012,236(4):1227-1237
In Arabidopsis, two AUXIN RESPONSE FACTORs (ARF7 and ARF19) and several Aux/IAAs regulate auxin-induced lateral root (LR) formation. As direct targets of ARF7 and ARF19, LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES DOMAIN 16 (LBD16), LBD29, and LBD18 have a biological function in the formation of lateral roots (LRs). However, the details of the functions of these three LBDs have remained unclear. Each single T-DNA insert mutant has been shown to have slightly fewer LRs than the wild type. We then created a triple mutant, which exhibited a dramatic defect in the LR formation. Our results show that the lbd mutations can lead to impairment in auxin-induced pericycle cell division and in the expression levels of some D-type cyclins (CYCDs). Simultaneously, PLETHORA (PLT) and PIN-FORMED (PIN), which have been well documented to promote cell mitotic activity and are required for auxin response effects, were down-regulated by these lbd mutations. Our results so far indicate that CYCDs, PLT, and PINs are the main targets of the LBDs. We believe that these three LBDs are involved in cell cycle progression of the pericycle in response to auxin. Overexpression of any of these three LBD genes in the triple mutant was found incapable of completely replacing the other two LBDs. The phenotypes of lbd29 mutants were not completely consistent with lbd16 or lbd18 mutants. This indicates that LBD29 may play a distinctive role compared with LBD16 or LBD18 and LBDs might play partially independent roles during the formation of LRs.  相似文献   

9.
Li J  Dai X  Zhao Y 《Plant physiology》2006,140(3):899-908
Although auxin response factors (ARFs) are the first well-characterized proteins that bind to the auxin response elements, elucidation of the roles of each ARF gene in auxin responses and plant development has been challenging. Here we show that ARF19 and ARF7 not only participate in auxin signaling, but also play a critical role in ethylene responses in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) roots, indicating that the ARFs serve as a cross talk point between the two hormones. Both arf19 and arf7 mutants isolated from our forward genetic screens are auxin resistant and the arf19arf7 double mutant had stronger auxin resistance than the single mutants and displayed phenotypes not seen in the single mutants. Furthermore, we show that a genomic fragment of ARF19 not only complements arf19, but also rescues arf7. We conclude that ARF19 complements ARF7 at the protein level and that the ARF7 target sequences are also recognized by ARF19. Therefore, it is the differences in expression level/pattern and not the differences in protein sequences between the two ARFs that determines the relative contribution of the two ARFs in auxin signaling and plant development. In addition to being auxin resistant, arf19 has also ethylene-insensitive roots and ARF19 expression is induced by ethylene treatment. This work provides a sensitive genetic screen for uncovering auxin-resistant mutants including the described arf mutants. This study also provides a likely mechanism for coordination and integration of hormonal signals to regulate plant growth and development.  相似文献   

10.
11.
We have isolated a dominant, auxin-insensitive mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, massugu2 (msg2), that displays neither hypocotyl gravitropism nor phototropism, fails to maintain an apical hook as an etiolated seedling, and is defective in lateral root formation. Yet other aspects of growth and development of msg2 plants are almost normal. These characteristics of msg2 are similar to those of another auxin-insensitive mutant, non-phototropic hypocotyl4 (nph4), which is a loss-of-function mutant of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR7 (ARF7) (Harper et al., 2000). Map-based cloning of the MSG2 locus reveals that all four mutant alleles result in amino acid substitutions in the conserved domain II of an Auxin/Indole-3-Acetic Acid protein, IAA19. Interestingly, auxin inducibility of MSG2/IAA19 gene expression is reduced by 65% in nph4/arf7. Moreover, MSG2/IAA19 protein binds to the C-terminal domain of NPH4/ARF7 in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) two-hybrid assay and to the whole latter protein in vitro by pull-down assay. These results suggest that MSG2/IAA19 and NPH4/ARF7 may constitute a negative feedback loop to regulate differential growth responses of hypocotyls and lateral root formation.  相似文献   

12.
13.
Wang JW  Wang LJ  Mao YB  Cai WJ  Xue HW  Chen XY 《The Plant cell》2005,17(8):2204-2216
The plant root cap mediates the direction of root tip growth and protects internal cells. Root cap cells are continuously produced from distal stem cells, and the phytohormone auxin provides position information for root distal organization. Here, we identify the Arabidopsis thaliana auxin response factors ARF10 and ARF16, targeted by microRNA160 (miR160), as the controller of root cap cell formation. The Pro(35S):MIR160 plants, in which the expression of ARF10 and ARF16 is repressed, and the arf10-2 arf16-2 double mutants display the same root tip defect, with uncontrolled cell division and blocked cell differentiation in the root distal region and show a tumor-like root apex and loss of gravity-sensing. ARF10 and ARF16 play a role in restricting stem cell niche and promoting columella cell differentiation; although functionally redundant, the two ARFs are indispensable for root cap development, and the auxin signal cannot bypass them to initiate columella cell production. In root, auxin and miR160 regulate the expression of ARF10 and ARF16 genes independently, generating a pattern consistent with root cap development. We further demonstrate that miR160-uncoupled production of ARF16 exerts pleiotropic effects on plant phenotypes, and miR160 plays an essential role in regulating Arabidopsis development and growth.  相似文献   

14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Auxin is important for lateral root (LR) initiation and subsequent LR primordium development. However, the roles of tissue-specific auxin signaling in these processes are poorly understood. We analyzed transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the stabilized mutant INDOLE-3 ACETIC ACID 14 (IAA14)/SOLITARY-ROOT (mIAA14) protein as a repressor of the auxin response factors (ARFs), under the control of tissue-specific promoters. We showed that plants expressing the mIAA14-glucocorticoid receptor (GR) fusion protein under the control of the native IAA14 promoter had the solitary-root/iaa14 mutant phenotypes, including the lack of LR formation under dexamethasone (Dex) treatment, indicating that mIAA14-GR is functional in the presence of Dex. We then demonstrated that expression of mIAA14-GR under the control of the stele-specific SHORT-ROOT promoter suppressed LR formation, and showed that mIAA14-GR expression in the protoxylem-adjacent pericycle also blocked LR formation, indicating that the normal auxin response mediated by auxin/indole-3 acetic acid (Aux/IAA) signaling in the protoxylem pericycle is necessary for LR formation. In addition, we demonstrated that expression of mIAA14-GR under either the ARF7 or the ARF19 promoter also suppressed LR formation as in the arf7 arf19 double mutants, and that IAA14 interacted with ARF7 and ARF19 in yeasts. These results strongly suggest that mIAA14-GR directly inactivates ARF7/ARF19 functions, thereby blocking LR formation. Post-embryonic expression of mIAA14-GR under the SCARECROW promoter, which is expressed in the specific cell lineage during LR primordium formation, caused disorganized LR development. This indicates that normal auxin signaling in LR primordia, which involves the unknown ARFs and Aux/IAAs, is necessary for the establishment of LR primordium organization. Thus, our data show that tissue-specific expression of a stabilized Aux/IAA protein allows analysis of tissue-specific auxin responses in LR development by inactivating ARF functions.  相似文献   

19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号