Computerized reporting and follow-up of gynecologic cytology

A system utilizing inexpensive computer hardware to produce high-quality cytology report and to provide an extensive, semi-automated follow-up system is described. Key features of the reports generated are emphasized. The system uses the Bethesda System nomenclature for reporting cytologic findings to a wide range of physicians, from general practitioners to gynecologists to subspecialists in gynecologic oncology.     

Diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy for squamous and glandular cervical intraepithelial lesions

The main objective of work was to determine a diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy as a method of screening and differential diagnosis, as well as to determine the relative value of some colposcopic features of squamous and glandular cervical intraepithelial lesions. Cytological diagnosis and colposcopy findings is compared with histological ones for 187 patients with intraepithelial lesions (142 squamous and 45 glandular ones with or without squamous components) and determined the sensitivity and positive predictive value of cytology and colposcopy, including the types of colposcopic abnormalities associated with squamous/glandular intraepithelial lesions. The sensitivity of cytology as a screening method for SIL (squamous intraepithelial lesions) is 89% and for GIL (glandular intraepithelial lesions) 98%. Positive predictive value of differential cytology for SIL is 59% and for GIL 53%. Sensitivity of colposcopy for both lesions' type is 87%. Acetowhite epithelium occurs for more often with SIL, whereas atypical vessels and unequal, dilated gland openings with GIL (p < 0.05). Cytology and colposcopy as screening methods have a high sensitivity. Nevertheless, cytology is far more accurate in determining differential diagnosis of SIL than GIL and some colposcopy abnormalities suspicious of GIL should be further tested in praxis.     

Computerized interactive morphometry of brushing cytology specimens

Forty-two bronchial brushing cytology specimens were evaluated by a video-based computerized interactive morphometry (CIM) system with an interactive peripheral consisting of a touch-sensitive screen mounted over a high-resolution video monitor. The system was programmed to allow a trained observer to rapidly measure nuclear and cytoplasmic profile diameters of randomly selected cells and to calculate their nuclear-cytoplasmic ratios. The specimens included 13 cytologic slides with no malignant cells present, 14 with non-small cell carcinoma cells and 15 with small cell carcinoma cells. The cases were divided into two groups: a training set composed of slides with "known diagnosis" and a test set of slides with "unknown diagnosis". A data set was constructed with the measurements from the cases with "known diagnosis," and an algorithm that allowed the classification of cases by hierarchical analysis was developed. The data was also analyzed with statistical methods of classificatory discriminant analysis. Utilizing the information in the data base, the slides with "unknown diagnosis" were classified individually; all cases were correctly classified by the procedures. Potential applications of CIM in cytology are discussed.     

The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia

Objective:  To determine the role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in the management of endocervical neoplasia.
Setting:  Colposcopy unit and cytology laboratory in a teaching hospital.
Sample:  Group 1 included 184 smears showing endocervical glandular neoplasia from 129 patients and group 2 included 101 patients with histology showing endocervical abnormalities in a 6-year period (1993–1998). Follow-up of 6–11 years to 2004 was available.
Methods:  Group 1 were identified from the cytology computer records. Group 2 were identified from histology records on the cytology database and a record of histology cases kept for audit purposes. The clinical records were examined retrospectively.
Results:  The positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormal endocervical cells in smears was 81.1% for significant glandular/squamous [cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade2 (CIN2 or worse)] lesions. The PPV of colposcopy was 93.5% for significant glandular/squamous lesions of the cervix. The postcolposcopy probability of a significant lesion when colposcopy was normal was 87.5%. The sensitivity of colposcopy in detecting endocervical lesions was 9.8%. The sensitivity of cervical smears in detecting a significant endocervical abnormality (CGIN or worse) was 66.3%. The false negative rate for cytology of endocervical glandular lesions was 4.0%.
Conclusions:  Endocervical glandular neoplasia detected on cytology is predictive of significant cervical pathology even when colposcopy is normal, which supports excisional biopsy in the primary assessment of these smears. The high concomitant squamous abnormality rate justifies the use of colposcopy to direct biopsies from the ectocervix. Cervical cytology is the only current screening method for cervical glandular abnormalities but sensitivity is poor.     

New diagnostic reporting format for endometrial cytology based on cytoarchitectural criteria

Objective:  The aim of this study was to develop a new reporting format for endometrial cytology that would standardize the diagnostic criteria and the terminology used for reporting.
Methods:  In previous studies, cytoarchitectural criteria were found to be useful for the cytological assessment of endometrial lesions. To apply these criteria, an appropriate cytological specimen is imperative. In this article, the requirements of an adequate endometrial cytological specimen for the new diagnostic criteria are first discussed. Then, the diagnostic criteria, standardized on a combination of conventional and cytoarchitectural criteria, are presented. Third, terminology that could be used, not only for reporting the histopathological diagnosis, but also for providing better guidance for the gynaecologist to determine further clinical action, is introduced. The proposed reporting format was investigated using endometrial cytology of 58 cases that were cytologically underestimated or overestimated compared to the histopathological diagnosis made on the subsequent endometrial biopsy or surgical specimens.
Results:  Of the 58 cases, 12 were reassessed as being unsatisfactory for evaluation. Among the remaining 46 cases, 25 of the 27 cases, which had been underestimated and subsequently diagnosed as having endometrial carcinoma or a precursor stage on histopathological examination,were reassessed as recommended for endometrial biopsy. On the other hand, 19 cases overestimated by cytology were all reassessed as not requiring biopsy.
Conclusions:  The reporting format for endometrial cytology proposed in this article may improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce the number of patients managed inappropriately.     

Bethesda 2001. Impact on the reporting of gynecologic cytology

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of implementing Bethesda 2001 in one laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: A computer search identified all cervicovaginal specimens evaluated between July 2001 and June 2002. Bethesda 2001 was implemented on January 1, 2002. The rates of specimen adequacy and the frequency of each diagnostic category 6 months before and 6 months after the implementation of Bethesda 2001 were compared. RESULTS: A total of 21,332 cervicovaginal specimens were evaluated during the study period. During the first 6 months, 10,695 specimens were examined; 40% were liquid-based preparations. During the next 6 months, 10,367 specimens were examined; 60% were liquid-based preparations. Prior to the implementation of Bethesda 2001, the percentages of each category were as follows: 74.99% within normal limits, 7.10% reactive/reparative cellular changes (R/R), 10.29% atypical squamous cells (ASC), 0.24% atypical glandular cells (AGC), 3.45% low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 3.44% high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and 0.73% unsatisfactory. In addition, 19.00% were classified as "satisfactory but limited by" (SBLB). Following the implementation of Bethesda 2001, the percentages of each category were as follows: 80.09% negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy including 6.94% with the qualifier R/R, 10.32% ASC, 0.27% AGC, 4.54% LSIL, 3.44% HSIL and 0.81% unsatisfactory. In addition, 17.40% were satisfactory with a quality indicator (SAT with QI). The incidence of reporting benign endometrial cells in patients over age 40 was the same for both periods. There was a significant decrease in the percentage of specimens classified as SAT with QI when compared to that of specimens classified as SBLB. A statistically significant increase in the percentage of specimens was noted in the category LSIL (P < or = .001) and satisfactory (.005) after implementing Bethesda 2001. No significant changes were noted in other categories. CONCLUSION: Our laboratory experienced some changes in the laboratory statistics of reporting gynecologic cytology after the implementation of Bethesda 2001. Continuous monitoring of reporting trends is indicated to clearly understand the impact of Bethesda 2001 on laboratory statistics.     

A screening system for cervical cancer cytology.

A system for screening cervical cytological preparations is described which employs the Leitz Texture Analyzer System (E. Leitz, Rockleigh, N. J.) quantitative staining with acridine orange, and a fluorescence standard. The instrumentation scans cells on microscope slides and detects objects which it interprets to be nuclei with excess total nuclear green fluorescence intensity (Previous results employing manual measurements have indicated that normal nuclei do not produce total nuclear green fluorescence greater than a specific absolute intensity level). Detected objects are identified by visual observation. Cells (102,000) from 65 patients (29 normal, 36 abnormal) have been examined. In each abnormal sample, at least one abnormal cell was detected. In over half of the samples, three or fewer other objects (e.g. clumps of polymorphonuclear leukocytes) were detected. These are easily distinguishable from single nuclei, and could be discarded by someone with minimal cytological training.     

Performance of cytology and colposcopy in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women

As part of an extensive multi-institutional DIANAIDS-HIV-HPV-SIL project run in Italy (co-ordinated by ISS), the present study compares the performance (sensitivity, specificity, agreement) of routine cervical smear cytology with that of colposcopy in the detection of histologically-confirmed CIN lesions in 37 HIV-positive and 21 HIV-negative women, belonging to the DIANAIDS cohort of 459 women. All women were subjected to a cervical smear, colposcopy and biopsy, making possible the pairwise comparison of these techniques. In the whole series of HIV-positive and HIV-negative women, cytology had a sensitivity of 86.9% and specificity of 83.3%, the sensitivity of grade 2 abnormality on colposcopy against histology being 82.6% and specificity, 33.3%. No statistically significant difference was observed in the performance of Pap smears between the HIV-positive and HIV-negative women. The sensitivity of cytology was 89.7% vs 82.4% and the specificity, 75% vs 100%. For colposcopy, the sensitivity was 79.3% vs 88.2% and the specificity, 75% vs 50%. These data suggest that cervical Pap smear cytology is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool in the clinical monitoring of lower genital tract pathology in HIV-positive women. Colposcopy, on the other hand, proved to be a somewhat less accurate diagnostic tool in these women.