p73 and p63 are homotetramers capable of weak heterotypic interactions with each other but not with p53.

Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene are the most frequent genetic alterations found in human cancers. Recent identification of two human homologues of p53 has raised the prospect of functional interactions between family members via a conserved oligomerization domain. Here we report in vitro and in vivo analysis of homo- and hetero-oligomerization of p53 and its homologues, p63 and p73. The oligomerization domains of p63 and p73 can independently fold into stable homotetramers, as previously observed for p53. However, the oligomerization domain of p53 does not associate with that of either p73 or p63, even when p53 is in 15-fold excess. On the other hand, the oligomerization domains of p63 and p73 are able to weakly associate with one another in vitro. In vivo co-transfection assays of the ability of p53 and its homologues to activate reporter genes showed that a DNA-binding mutant of p53 was not able to act in a dominant negative manner over wild-type p73 or p63 but that a p73 mutant could inhibit the activity of wild-type p63. These data suggest that mutant p53 in cancer cells will not interact with endogenous or exogenous p63 or p73 via their respective oligomerization domains. It also establishes that the multiple isoforms of p63 as well as those of p73 are capable of interacting via their common oligomerization domain.     

Early diversification and complex evolutionary history of the p53 tumor suppressor gene family

The p53 tumor suppressor plays the leading role in malignancy and in maintaining the genome's integrity and stability. p53 belongs to a gene family that in vertebrates includes two additional members, p63 and p73. Although similar in sequence, gene structure, and expression potential, the three p53 members differ in domain organization (in addition to the transactivation, DNA-binding, and tetramerization domains, p63 and p73 encode a sterile alpha motif, SAM, domain) and functional roles (with p63 and p73 assuming additional key roles in development). It is interesting to note that outside vertebrates, p53-like sequences have only been found as single genes, of either the p53 or the p63/p73 type (i.e., without or with a SAM domain, respectively). In this paper, we report that the diversification of this family is not restricted to the vertebrate lineage, as both a p53- and a p63/p73-type sequence are present in the unicellular choanoflagellate, Monosiga brevicollis. Furthermore, multiple independent duplication events involving p53-type sequences took place in several other animal lineages (cnidarians, flat worms, insects). These findings argue that selective factors other than those associated with the evolution of vertebrates are also relevant to the diversification of this family. Understanding the selective pressures associated with the multiple independent duplication events that took place in the p53 family and the roles of p53-like proteins outside vertebrates will provide further insight into the evolution of this very important family. In addition, the presence of both a p53 and a p63/73 copy in the unicellular M. brevicollis argues for its suitability as a model system for elucidating the functions of the p53 members and the mechanisms associated with their functional diversification.     

Interrelations between p73 and p53: a model, neuroblastoma

Homologies in sequence and gene organization of p53 and their relatives, p73 and p63, suggest similar biological functions. However differences exist between the p53 family members. Indeed in human tumors p53 is often mutated while p63 and p73 are very rarely mutated. In addition, in contrast to p53 which is transcribed in a unique mRNA species spanning all gene exons, each homologue expresses two types of isoforms: some with transactivation domain (TAD) showing tumor suppressive properties, the others deprived of TAD, with oncogenic properties. If p53 responds to immediate genotoxic stress, its homologues participate to the cell homeostasis of specific tissues along their development and differentiation, neuronal tissue for p73, epithelial for p63. However a collaboration between the three p53 family members has been shown to occur in response to cell genotoxic damages. Neuroblastic tumors characterized by a large spectrum of neuronal differentiation constitute a good model to study relationship between p73 and p53 as well as the regulation of their respective expression.     

Regulating the genome surveillance system: miRNAs and the p53 super family

The p53 gene super family consists of three members; TP53, TP63 and TP73, encoding proteins p53, p63 and p73. Whilst p63 appears to have an essential role in embryonic development with a less clear role in carcinogenesis, irregularities in p53 and p73 signalling are implicated in tumour formation. As such, p53 is a tumour suppressor which is mutated in over 50% cancers and p73 was recently formally classified as a tumour suppressor based on data showing p73 deficient mice generate spontaneous tumours similar to those observed in p53 null mice. Dysregulation of both p53 and p73 has been correlated with cancer progression in many cell types and although mutation of these genes is often observed, some form of p53/p73 deregulation likely occurs in all tumour cells. The discovery that complementary micro RNAs (miRNAs) are able to target both of these genes provides a potential new means of perturbing p53/p73 signalling networks in cancer cells. Here we summarise the current literature regarding the involvement of miRNAs in the modulation of p53 family proteins and cancer development and detail the use of in silico methods to reveal key miRNA targets.     

p73 and p63: Why Do We Still Need Them?

When p73 and p63 were initially described as homologues of the tumor suppressor p53, the three family members seemed almost exchangeable, raising the question why all three were retained during evolution. It later turned out that the corresponding genes, TP63 and TP73, appear phylogenetically older than TP53, and that their targeted deletion causes severe developmental defects, in contrast to a deletion of TP53. Hence, p63 and p73 are responsible for biological effects that cannot be elicited by p53 alone. Here, we provide an overview of properties ascribed to p63 and p73 that distinguish them from p53. Differences occur at the following levels: i) protein structure, especially with regard to the aminoterminal transactivation domains and the carboxyterminal portions unique to p63 and p73; ii) regulation, affecting mRNA levels, posttranslational modifications and interaction with other cellular proteins; iii) activities, resulting in the regulation of gene expression, the programming of development, and the emergence of tumors. We speculate that, during the course of evolution, p63 and p73 have first pursued a broader range of activities, whereas p53 later specialized on genome maintenance.     

p53 Family members p63 and p73 are SAM domain-containing proteins.

Homologs of the tumor suppressor p53, called p63 and p73, have been identified. The p63 and p73 family members possess a domain structure similar to p53, but contain variable C-terminal extensions. We find that some of the C-terminal extensions contain Sterile Alpha Motif (SAM) domains. SAM domains are protein modules that are involved in protein-protein interactions. Consistent with this role, the C-terminal SAM domains of the p63 and p73 may regulate function by recruiting other protein effectors.