Substrate deformation determines actin cytoskeleton reorganization: A mathematical modeling and experimental study

A mathematical model has been developed to define the relationship between the actin cytoskeleton reorganization of a cell and substrate deformation acting on the cell. The model is based on the following major assumptions: (a) normal substrate strain, not the shear substrate strain, determines the actin cytoskeleton reorganization; (b) the normal substrate strain is transmitted to individual actin filaments; (c) each actin filament has a basal strain energy (BSE) when the cell adheres to the substrate without stretching; and (d) the actin filaments undergo disassembly when their strain energies are decreased to zero or increased to twice their BSEs. The resulting model predicts that the actin filaments are formed in the direction where their BSEs are minimally altered. This direction is therefore the one without normal substrate strain. The prediction was confirmed by experiments conducted on both fibroblasts and endothelial cells. The present model may be relevant for understanding better the effects of mechanical stimuli on the cells.     

MARCKS-Related Protein Binds to Actin without Significantly Affecting Actin Polymerization or Network Structure

Actinis a 42-kDa protein which, due to its ability to polymerize into filaments (F-actin), is one of the major constituents of the cytoskeleton. It has been proposed that MARCKS (an acronym for myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate) proteins play an important role in regulating the structure and mechanical properties of the actin cytoskeleton by cross-linking actin filaments. We have recently reported that peptides corresponding to the effector domain of MARCKS proteins promote actin polymerization and cause massive bundling of actin filaments. We now investigate the effect of MARCKS-related protein, a 20-kDa member of the MARCKS family, on both filament structure and the kinetics of actin polymerization in vitro. Our experiments document that MRP binds to F-actin with micromolar affinity and that the myristoyl chain at the N-terminus of MRP is not required for this interaction. In marked contrast to the effector peptide, binding of MRP is not accompanied by an acceleration of actin polymerization kinetics, and we also could not reliably observe an actin cross-linking activity of MRP.     

MARCKS-related protein binds to actin without significantly affecting actin polymerization or network structure. Myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate

Actinis a 42-kDa protein which, due to its ability to polymerize into filaments (F-actin), is one of the major constituents of the cytoskeleton. It has been proposed that MARCKS (an acronym for myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate) proteins play an important role in regulating the structure and mechanical properties of the actin cytoskeleton by cross-linking actin filaments. We have recently reported that peptides corresponding to the effector domain of MARCKS proteins promote actin polymerization and cause massive bundling of actin filaments. We now investigate the effect of MARCKS-related protein, a 20-kDa member of the MARCKS family, on both filament structure and the kinetics of actin polymerization in vitro. Our experiments document that MRP binds to F-actin with micromolar affinity and that the myristoyl chain at the N-terminus of MRP is not required for this interaction. In marked contrast to the effector peptide, binding of MRP is not accompanied by an acceleration of actin polymerization kinetics, and we also could not reliably observe an actin cross-linking activity of MRP.     

Assembly and Function of the Actin Cytoskeleton of Yeast: Relationships between Cables and Patches

Actin in eukaryotic cells is found in different pools, with filaments being organized into a variety of supramolecular assemblies. To investigate the assembly and functional relationships between different parts of the actin cytoskeleton in one cell, we studied the morphology and dynamics of cables and patches in yeast. The fine structure of actin cables and the manner in which cables disassemble support a model in which cables are composed of a number of overlapping actin filaments. No evidence for intrinsic polarity of cables was found.To investigate to what extent different parts of the actin cytoskeleton depend on each other, we looked for relationships between cables and patches. Patches and cables were often associated, and their polarized distributions were highly correlated. Therefore, patches and cables do appear to depend on each other for assembly and function.Many cell types show rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton, which can occur via assembly or movement of actin filaments. In our studies, dramatic changes in actin polarization did not include changes in filamentous actin. In addition, the concentration of actin patches was relatively constant as cells grew. Therefore, cells do not have bursts of activity in which new parts of the actin cytoskeleton are created.     

Functional design in the actin cytoskeleton

Changes in cell shape, anchorage and motility are all associated with the dynamic reorganisation of the architectural arrays of actin filaments that make up the actin cytoskeleton. The relative expression of these functionally different actin filament arrays is intimately linked to the pattern of contacts that a cell develops with its extracellular substrate. Cell polarity is acquired by the development of an asymmetric pattern of substrate contacts, effected in a specific, site-directed manner by the delivery of adhesion-site modulators along microtubules.     

Differential effects of actin cytoskeleton dynamics on equine infectious anemia virus particle production

Retrovirus assembly and budding involve a highly dynamic and concerted interaction of viral and cellular proteins. Previous studies have shown that retroviral Gag proteins interact with actin filaments, but the significance of these interactions remains to be defined. Using equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV), we now demonstrate differential effects of cellular actin dynamics at distinct stages of retrovirus assembly and budding. First, virion production was reduced when EIAV-infected cells were treated with phallacidin, a cell-permeable reagent that stabilizes actin filaments by slowing down their depolymerization. Confocal microscopy confirmed that the inhibition of EIAV production correlated temporally over several days with the incorporation dynamics of phallacidin into the actin cytoskeleton. Although the overall structure of the actin cytoskeleton and expression of viral protein appeared to be unaffected, phallacidin treatment dramatically reduced the amount of full-length Gag protein associated with the actin cytoskeleton. These data suggest that an association of full-length Gag proteins with de novo actin filaments might contribute to Gag assembly and budding. On the other hand, virion production was enhanced when EIAV-infected cells were incubated briefly (2 h) with the actin-depolymerizing drugs cytochalasin D and latrunculin B. Interestingly, the enhanced virion production induced by cytochalasin D required a functional late (L) domain, either the EIAV YPDL L-domain or the proline-rich L domains derived from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 or Rous sarcoma virus, respectively. Thus, depolymerization of actin filaments may be a common function mediated by retrovirus L domains during late stages of viral budding. Taken together, these observations indicate that dynamic actin polymerization and depolymerization may be associated with different stages of viral production.     

Arachidonic acid signaling to the cytoskeleton: the role of cyclooxygenase and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in actin bundling

Cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix via integrins is a primary regulatory mechanism for numerous aspects of normal cellular function. However, disruption of this interaction can result in pathology. For example, one characteristic of transformed cells is loss of adhesion dependence for viability. Adhesion also is a necessary step in tumor metastasis. It has been shown previously, in HeLa cells, that cell attachment to a gelatin-coated substrate results in the release of arachidonic acid, which is metabolized by lipoxygenase. A subsequent cascade of lipid second messengers activates protein kinase C, which triggers actin polymerization leading to cell spreading. We now demonstrate by inhibitor studies and biochemical analysis, a parallel branch of arachidonic acid signaling that reorganizes the actin cytoskeleton into small bundles. This branch of the pathway is initiated by cyclooxygenase, which generates prostaglandins and causes the downstream activation of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. This work elucidates a system of interacting signals in which arachidonic acid functions at a branch point in cytoskeletal signaling. The lipoxygenase branch provides polymerized actin; these actin filaments act as a substrate for the cylooxygenase branch to generate actin bundles.     

Alpha-catenin is a molecular switch that binds E-cadherin-beta-catenin and regulates actin-filament assembly

Epithelial cell-cell junctions, organized by adhesion proteins and the underlying actin cytoskeleton, are considered to be stable structures maintaining the structural integrity of tissues. Contrary to the idea that alpha-catenin links the adhesion protein E-cadherin through beta-catenin to the actin cytoskeleton, in the accompanying paper we report that alpha-catenin does not bind simultaneously to both E-cadherin-beta-catenin and actin filaments. Here we demonstrate that alpha-catenin exists as a monomer or a homodimer with different binding properties. Monomeric alpha-catenin binds more strongly to E-cadherin-beta-catenin, whereas the dimer preferentially binds actin filaments. Different molecular conformations are associated with these different binding states, indicating that alpha-catenin is an allosteric protein. Significantly, alpha-catenin directly regulates actin-filament organization by suppressing Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization, likely by competing with the Arp2/3 complex for binding to actin filaments. These results indicate a new role for alpha-catenin in local regulation of actin assembly and organization at sites of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion.     

Bacterial toxins modifying the actin cytoskeleton.

Numerous bacterial toxins recognize the actin cytoskeleton as a target. The clostridial binary toxins (Iota and C2 families) ADP-ribosylate the actin monomers causing the dissociation of the actin filaments. The large clostridial toxins from Clostridium difficile, Clostridium sordellii and Clostridium novyi inactivate, by glucosylation, proteins from the Rho family that regulate actin polymerization. In contrast, the cytotoxic necrotic factor from Escherichia coli activates Rho by deamidation and increases the formation of actin filaments. The enterotoxin of Bacteroides fragilis is a protease specific for E-cadherin and it promotes the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. The bacterial toxins that modify the actin cytoskeleton induce various cell disfunctions including changes in cell barrier permeability and disruption of intercellular junctions.     

Ligand-Mediated Friction Determines Morphodynamics of Spreading T?Cells

Spreading of T cells on antigen presenting cells is a crucial initial step in immune response. Spreading occurs through rapid morphological changes concomitant with the reorganization of surface receptors and of the cytoskeleton. Ligand mobility and frictional coupling of receptors to the cytoskeleton were separately recognized as important factors but a systematic study to explore their biophysical role in spreading was hitherto missing. To explore the impact of ligand mobility, we prepared chemically identical substrates on which molecules of anti-CD3 (capable of binding and activating the T cell receptor complex), were either immobilized or able to diffuse. We quantified the T cell spreading area and cell edge dynamics using quantitative reflection interference contrast microscopy, and imaged the actin distribution. On mobile ligands, as compared to fixed ligands, the cells spread much less, the actin is centrally, rather than peripherally distributed and the edge dynamics is largely altered. Blocking myosin-II or adding molecules of ICAM1 on the substrate largely abrogates these differences. We explain these observations by building a model based on the balance of forces between activation-dependent actin polymerization and actomyosin-generated tension on one hand, and on the frictional coupling of the ligand-receptor complexes with the actin cytoskeleton, the membrane and the substrate, on the other hand. Introducing the measured edge velocities in the model, we estimate the coefficient of frictional coupling between T Cell receptors or LFA-1 and the actin cytoskeleton. Our results provide for the first time, to our knowledge, a quantitative framework bridging T cell-specific biology with concepts developed for integrin-based mechanisms of spreading.     

A two-tiered mechanism by which Cdc42 controls the localization and activation of an Arp2/3-activating motor complex in yeast

The establishment of cell polarity in budding yeast involves assembly of actin filaments at specified cortical domains. Elucidation of the underlying mechanism requires an understanding of the machinery that controls actin polymerization and how this machinery is in turn controlled by signaling proteins that respond to polarity cues. We showed previously that the yeast orthologue of the Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome protein, Bee1/Las17p, and the type I myosins are key regulators of cortical actin polymerization. Here, we demonstrate further that these proteins together with Vrp1p form a multivalent Arp2/3-activating complex. During cell polarization, a bifurcated signaling pathway downstream of the Rho-type GTPase Cdc42p recruits and activates this complex, leading to local assembly of actin filaments. One branch, which requires formin homologues, mediates the recruitment of the Bee1p complex to the cortical site where the activated Cdc42p resides. The other is mediated by the p21-activated kinases, which activate the motor activity of myosin-I through phosphorylation. Together, these findings provide insights into the essential processes leading to polarization of the actin cytoskeleton.     

Models of the Collective Behavior of Proteins in Cells: Tubulin, Actin and Motor Proteins

One of the most important issues of molecular biophysics is the complex and multifunctional behavior of the cell's cytoskeleton. Interiors of living cells are structurally organized by the cytoskeleton networks of filamentous protein polymers: microtubules, actin and intermediate filaments with motor proteins providing force and directionality needed for transport processes. Microtubules (MT's) take active part in material transport within the cell, constitute the most rigid elements of the cell and hence found many uses in cell motility (e.g. flagella andcilia). At present there is, however, no quantitatively predictable explanation of how these important phenomena are orchestrated at a molecular level. Moreover, microtubules have been demonstrated to self-organize leading to pattern formation. We discuss here several models which attempt to shed light on the assembly of microtubules and their interactions with motor proteins. Subsequently, an overview of actin filaments and their properties isgiven with particular emphasis on actin assembly processes. The lengths of actin filaments have been reported that were formed by spontaneous polymerization of highly purified actin monomers after labeling with rhodamine-phalloidin. The length distributions are exponential with a mean of about 7 μm. This length is independent of the initial concentration of actin monomer, an observation inconsistent with a simple nucleation-elongation mechanism. However, with the addition of physically reasonable rates of filament annealing and fragmenting, a nucleation-elongation mechanism can reproduce the observed average length of filaments in two types of experiments: (1) filaments formed from a wide range of highly purified actin monomer concentrations, and (2) filaments formed from 24 mM actin over a range of CapZ concentrations. In the final part of the paper we briefly review the stochastic models used to describe the motion of motor proteins on protein filaments. The vast majority of these models are based on ratchet potentials with the presence of thermal noise and forcing due to ATP binding and a subsequent hydrolysis. Many outstanding questions remain to be quantitatively addressed on a molecular level in order to explain the structure-to-function relationship for the key elements of the cytoskeleton discussed in this review. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The regulation of actin polymerization and cross-linking in Dictyostelium

It is clear that the polymerization and organization of actin filament networks plays a critical role in numerous cellular processes. Inhibition of actin polymerization by pharmacological agents will completely prevent chemotactic motility, macropinocytosis, endocytosis, and phagocytosis. Recently there has been great progress in understanding the mechanisms that control the assembly and structure of the actin cytoskeleton. Members of the Rho family of GTPases have been identified as major players in the signal transduction pathway leading from a cell surface signal to actin polymerization. The Arp2/3 complex has been added to the list of means by which new actin filaments can be nucleated. However, it is clear that actin polymerization by Arp2/3 complex is not the whole story. In principle, the final structures formed by actin filaments will depend on factors such as: the length of actin filaments, the degree of branching, how they are cross-linked and the tensions imparted on them. In addition, the means by which actin polymerization generates protrusion of membranes is still controversial. A phagosome, filopodium and a lamellipodium all require polymerization of new actin filaments, but each has a characteristic morphology and cytoskeletal structure. In the following chapter, we will discuss actin polymerization and filament organization, especially as it relates to the machinery of phagocytosis in Dictyostelium.     

Comparison of actin and cell surface dynamics in motile fibroblasts

We have investigated the dynamic behavior of actin in fibroblast lamellipodia using photoactivation of fluorescence. Activated regions of caged resorufin (CR)-labeled actin in lamellipodia of IMR 90 and MC7 3T3 fibroblasts were observed to move centripetally over time. Thus in these cells, actin filaments move centripetally relative to the substrate. Rates were characteristic for each cell type; 0.66 +/- 0.27 microns/min in IMR 90 and 0.36 +/- 0.16 microns/min in MC7 3T3 cells. In neither case was there any correlation between the rate of actin movement and the rate of lamellipodial protrusion. The half-life of the activated CR-actin filaments was approximately 1 min in IMR 90 lamellipodia, and approximately 3 min in MC7 3T3 lamellipodia. Thus continuous filament turnover accompanies centripetal movement. In both cell types, the length of time required for a section of the actin meshwork to traverse the lamellipodium was several times longer than the filament half-life. The dynamic behavior of the dorsal surface of the cell was also observed by tracking lectin-coated beads on the surface and phase-dense features within lamellipodia of MC7 3T3 cells. The movement of these dorsal features occurred at rates approximately three times faster than the rate of movement of the underlying bulk actin cytoskeleton, even when measured in the same individual cells. Thus the transport of these dorsal features must occur by some mechanism other than simple attachment to the moving bulk actin cytoskeleton.     

Role of extracellular matrix-cell interaction and epidermal growth factor (EGF) on EGF-receptors and actin cytoskeleton arrangement in infantile pituitary cells

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) induces changes in cell morphology, actin cytoskeleton, and adhesion processes in cultured infantile pituitary cells. The extracellular matrix, through integrin engagement, collaborates with growth factors in cell signaling. We have examined the participation of collagen I/III and collagen plus fibronectin in the EGF response of infantile pituitary cells with respect to their cell morphology and actin cytoskeleton. As a comparison, we have used poly-lysine as a substrate. Infantile cells elicit the EGF response when they are associated with extracellular matrix proteins, but no response can be obtained with poly-lysine as the substrate. Cells acquire a flattened shape and organize their actin filaments and vinculin as in focal adhesions. Because the EGF receptor (EGFR) is linked to the actin cytoskeleton in other cells structuring a microdomain in cell signaling, we have investigated this association and substrate adhesion participation in infantile pituitary cells. The proportion of EGFR associated with the actin cytoskeleton is approximately 31%; no difference has been observed between the substrates used. Cells in suspension show actin-associated EGFR, suggesting an association independent of cell adhesion. However, no colocalization of EGFRs with actin fibers has been observed, suggesting an indirect association. Compared with β₁-integrin, which is linked to actin fibers through structural proteins, EGFR binds more strongly with the actin cytoskeleton. This study thus shows cell adhesion dependence on the EGF effect in the actin cytoskeleton arrangement; this is probably favored by the actin fiber/EGFR association that facilitates the cell signaling pathways for actin cytoskeleton organization in infantile pituitary cells.This work was supported by the National Council of Science and Technology of México (grant 44619, and a fellowship to C.T.).     

Binding of human angiogenin inhibits actin polymerization

Angiogenin is a potent inducer of angiogenesis, a process of blood vessel formation. It interacts with endothelial and other cells and elicits a wide range of cellular responses including migration, proliferation, and tube formation. One important target of angiogenin is endothelial cell-surface actin and their interaction might be one of essential steps in angiogenin-induced neovascularization. Based on earlier indications that angiogenin promotes actin polymerization, we studied the binding interactions between angiogenin and actin in a wide range of conditions. We showed that at subphysiological KCl concentrations, angiogenin does not promote, but instead inhibits polymerization by sequestering G-actin. At low KCl concentrations angiogenin induces formation of unstructured aggregates, which, as shown by NMR, may be caused by angiogenin’s propensity to form oligomers. Binding of angiogenin to preformed F-actin does not cause depolymerization of actin filaments though it causes their stiffening. Binding of tropomyosin and angiogenin to F-actin is not competitive at concentrations sufficient for saturation of actin filaments. These observations suggest that angiogenin may cause changes in the cell cytoskeleton by inhibiting polymerization of G-actin and changing the physical properties of F-actin.     

Differentially oriented populations of actin filaments generated in lamellipodia collaborate in pushing and pausing at the cell front

Eukaryotic cells advance in phases of protrusion, pause and withdrawal. Protrusion occurs in lamellipodia, which are composed of diagonal networks of actin filaments, and withdrawal terminates with the formation of actin bundles parallel to the cell edge. Using correlated live-cell imaging and electron microscopy, we have shown that actin filaments in protruding lamellipodia subtend angles from 15-90 degrees to the front, and that transitions from protrusion to pause are associated with a proportional increase in filaments oriented more parallel to the cell edge. Microspike bundles of actin filaments also showed a wide angular distribution and correspondingly variable bilateral polymerization rates along the cell front. We propose that the angular shift of filaments in lamellipodia serves in adapting to slower protrusion rates while maintaining the filament densities required for structural support; further, we suggest that single filaments and microspike bundles contribute to the construction of the lamella behind and to the formation of the cell edge when protrusion ceases. Our findings provide an explanation for the variable turnover dynamics of actin filaments in lamellipodia observed by fluorescence speckle microscopy and are inconsistent with a current model of lamellipodia structure that features actin filaments branching at 70 degrees in a dendritic array.     

Cdc42 and RhoA are differentially regulated during arachidonate-mediated HeLa cell adhesion

Cell adhesion to extracellular matrix requires stimulation of an eicosanoid signaling pathway through the metabolism of arachidonate by 5-lipoxygenase to leukotrienes and cyclooxygenase-1/2 to prostaglandins, as well as activation of the small GTPase signaling pathway involving Cdc42 and Rho. These signaling pathways direct remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton during the adhesion process, specifically the polymerization of actin during cell spreading and the bundling of actin filaments when cells migrate. However, few studies linking these signaling pathways have been described in the literature. We have previously shown that HeLa cell adhesion to collagen requires oxidation of arachidonic acid (AA) by lipoxygenase for actin polymerization and cell spreading, and cyclooxygenase for bundling actin filaments during cell migration. We demonstrate that small GTPase activity is required for HeLa cell spreading upon gelatin, and that Cdc42 is activated while Rho is downregulated during the spreading process. Using constitutively active and dominant negative expression studies, we show that Cdc42 is required for HeLa cell spreading and migration, while activated RhoA is antagonistic towards spreading. Constitutively active RhoA promotes cell migration and increases the degree of actin bundling in HeLa cells. Further, we demonstrate that activation of either the AA oxidation pathway or the small GTPase pathway cannot rescue inhibition of spreading when the alternate pathway is blocked. Our results suggest (1) both the eicosanoid signaling pathway and small GTPase activation are required during HeLa cell adhesion, and (2) these signaling pathways converge to properly direct remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton during HeLa cell spreading and migration upon collagen.     

The lamellipodium: where motility begins

Lamellipodia, filopodia and membrane ruffles are essential for cell motility, the organization of membrane domains, phagocytosis and the development of substrate adhesions. Their formation relies on the regulated recruitment of molecular scaffolds to their tips (to harness and localize actin polymerization), coupled to the coordinated organization of actin filaments into lamella networks and bundled arrays. Their turnover requires further molecular complexes for the disassembly and recycling of lamellipodium components. Here, we give a spatial inventory of the many molecular players in this dynamic domain of the actin cytoskeleton in order to highlight the open questions and the challenges ahead.     

Actin dynamics rapidly reset chemoattractant receptor sensitivity following adaptation in neutrophils

Neutrophils are cells of the innate immune system that hunt and kill pathogens using directed migration. This process, known as chemotaxis, requires the regulation of actin polymerization downstream of chemoattractant receptors. Reciprocal interactions between actin and intracellular signals are thought to underlie many of the sophisticated signal processing capabilities of the chemotactic cascade including adaptation, amplification and long-range inhibition. However, with existing tools, it has been difficult to discern actin''s role in these processes. Most studies investigating the role of the actin cytoskeleton have primarily relied on actin-depolymerizing agents, which not only block new actin polymerization but also destroy the existing cytoskeleton. We recently developed a combination of pharmacological inhibitors that stabilizes the existing actin cytoskeleton by inhibiting actin polymerization, depolymerization and myosin-based rearrangements; we refer to these processes collectively as actin dynamics. Here, we investigated how actin dynamics influence multiple signalling responses (PI3K lipid products, calcium and Pak phosphorylation) following acute agonist addition or during desensitization. We find that stabilized actin polymer extends the period of receptor desensitization following agonist binding and that actin dynamics rapidly reset receptors from this desensitized state. Spatial differences in actin dynamics may underlie front/back differences in agonist sensitivity in neutrophils.