Effect of increasing GnRH and PGF2α dose during Double-Ovsynch on ovulatory response,luteal regression,and fertility of lactating dairy cows

Ovsynch-type synchronization of ovulation protocols have suboptimal synchronization rates due to reduced ovulation to the first GnRH treatment and inadequate luteolysis to the prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) treatment before timed artificial insemination (TAI). Our objective was to determine whether increasing the dose of the first GnRH or the PGF_2α treatment during the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of Double-Ovsynch could improve the rates of ovulation and luteolysis and therefore increase pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI). In experiment 1, cows were randomly assigned to a two-by-two factorial design to receive either a low (L) or high (H) doses of GnRH (Gonadorelin; 100 vs. 200 μg) and a PGF_2α analogue (cloprostenol; 500 vs. 750 μg) resulting in the following treatments: LL (n = 263), HL (n = 277), LH (n = 270), and HH (n = 274). Transrectal ultrasonography and serum progesterone (P4) were used to assess ovulation to GnRH1, GnRH2, and luteal regression after PGF_2α during Breeding-Ovsynch in a subgroup of cows (n = 651 at each evaluation). Pregnancy status was assessed 29, 39, and 74 days after TAI. In experiment 2, cows were randomly assigned to LL (n = 220) or HH (n = 226) treatment as described for experiment 1. For experiment 1, ovulation to GnRH1 was greater (P = 0.01) for cows receiving H versus L GnRH (66.6% [217/326] vs. 57.5% [187/325]) treatment, but only for cows with elevated P4 at GnRH1. Cows that ovulated to GnRH1 had increased (P < 0.001) fertility compared with cows that did not ovulate (52.2% vs. 38.5%); however, no effect of higher dose of GnRH on fertility was detected. The greater PGF_2α dose increased luteal regression primarily in multiparous cows (P = 0.03) and tended to increase fertility (P = 0.05) only at the pregnancy diagnosis 39 days after TAI. Overall, P/AI was 47.0% at 29 days and 39.7% at 74 days after TAI; P/AI did not differ (P = 0.10) among treatments at 74 days (LL, 34.6%; HL, 40.8%; LH, 42.2%; HH, 40.9%) and was greater (P < 0.001) for primiparous cows than for multiparous cows (46.1% vs. 33.8%). For experiment 2, P/AI did not differ (P = 0.21) between H versus L treatments (44.2% [100/226] vs. 40.5% [89/220]). Thus, despite an increase in ovulatory response to GnRH1 and luteal regression to PGF_2α, there were only marginal effects of increasing dose of GnRH or PGF_2α on fertility to TAI after Double-Ovsynch.     

Fertility of swamp buffalo following the synchronization of ovulation by the sequential administration of GnRH and PGF2alpha combined with fixed-timed artificial insemination

This study evaluated fertility in swamp buffalo after synchronization of ovulation combined with fixed time artificial insemination. At the start of the study, designated day 0, from a group of 98 female Thai swamp buffalo, 55 buffalo (heifers n° = 20 and cows n° = 35) were selected to be synchronized with GnRH (Day 0) followed by PGF₂alpha (Day 7) and a second treatment with GnRH (Day 9). All buffalo were inseminated at two fixed times 12 h and 24 h after the second injection of GnRH (Ovsynch+TAI group); a second group of 43 buffalo (heifers n° = 19 and cows n° = 24) were not treated and were artificially inseminated (AI) at natural estrus (AI group). Blood samples were taken 22 days after insemination to evaluate progesterone plasma levels. In the Ovsynch+TAI group, overall conception rate (CR; i.e. the number of cows with progesterone >4.0 ng/ml on day 22 after AI divided by the number of animals inseminated), was 38.1% and overall pregnancy rate (PR; i.e. the number of cows that were pregnant at day 50-60 after insemination divided by the number of animals inseminated), was 32.7%. In the AI group overall CR and PR was 34.9%.Within the Ovsynch+TAI group, CR and PR were reduced (P < 0.05) in heifers compared with cows (CR 15.0% vs. 51.4% for heifers and cows, respectively; PR 15.0% vs. 42.9% for heifers and cows, respectively). Within the AI group the efficacy of treatment was similar between heifers and cows (CR and PR 31.6% for heifers and 37.5% for cows).In conclusion, this study indicates that in swamp buffalo it is possible to synchronize ovulation and use timed artificial insemination with the Ovsynch+TAI protocol.     

Effect of intrauterine infusion of recombinant bovine interferon αI1 on luteal phase duration and oxytocin-induced release of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2α in postpartum beef cows

The objective of this study was to determine if oxytocin-induced release of prostaglandin F₂α (PGF_2α; measured by the stable metabolite, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F₂α (PGFM)) was inhibited following intrauterine infusion of bovine interferon-α_I1 (rboIFNα_I1) into postpartum cows anticipated to have short estrous cycles following first ovulation postpartum. Cows expected to have short estrous cycles were assigned to receive twice daily intrauterine infusions of either placebo (SCP; n = 11) or 2 mg rboIFNα_I1 (SCIFN; n = 14) on Days 1–16 following hCG injection (2500 IU; day 0) on Days 30 or 31 postpartum. On Day 5 following hCG, each cow was injected with 100 IU oxytocin (i.v.) to induce the release of uterine PGF_2α (as measured by PGFM). Other treatment groups consisted of cows expected to have normal estrous cycle lengths following pretreatment with a 9 day norgestomet implant on Days 21 or 22 postpartum followed by hCG injection to induce ovulation. Cows expected to have normal estrous cycle lengths received twice daily intrauterine infusions of either placebo from Days 1 to 16 of the cycle and 100 IU oxytocin (i.v.) on Day 5 (NCPE; n = 11) or twice daily infusions of placebo (NCPL; n = 7) or rboIFNα_I1 (NCIFN; n = 10), from Day 13 post-hCG injection until luteolysis. Oxytocin was injected (100 IU; i.v.) into cows in the NCPL and NCIFN groups on Day 16. The calculated areas under the curve (arbitrary PGFM units) were: 164 ± 18 units, 96 ± 16 units, 93 ± 18 units, 137 ± 27 units and 53 ± 20 units for SCP, SCIFN, NCPE, NCPL and NCIFN, respectively (SCIFN < SCP; NCIFN < NCPL; P < 0.015). Mean luteal phase length was calculated as the number of days from injection of hCG until progesterone declined to below 0.5 ng ml⁻¹ and was: 6.7 ± 1.0 days, 10.5 ± 0.9 days, 12.0 ± 1.0 days, 18.0 ± 1.3 days and 20.7 ± 1.1 days for SCP, SCIFN, NCPE, NCPL and NCIFN, respectively (SCP < SCIFN = NCPE < NCPL = NCIFN; P < 0.01). In summary, luteal phase lengths were increased and oxytocin-induced release of PGFM was reduced by rboIFNα_I1 infusion in cows anticipated to have short luteal phases.     

GnRH treatment at artificial insemination in beef cattle fails to increase plasma progesterone concentrations or pregnancy rates

Treatment with GnRH at the onset of standing estrus increased pregnancy percentages and circulating concentrations of progesterone in repeat breeder dairy cows. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of treatment with GnRH at AI on concentrations of progesterone and conception rates in beef cattle that exhibited estrus. Two hundred ninety-three heifers at four locations were synchronized with the Select Synch plus CIDR protocol (given GnRH and a CIDR was placed into the vagina, and 7 d later, given PGF_2α and CIDR removed; n = 253) or the 14-19 melengestrol acetate (MGA) protocol (MGA fed at 0.5 mg/head/d for 14 d, with PGF_2α 19 d after MGA withdrawal n = 40) and AI was done after detection of estrus. At Location 1, blood samples were collected on Day 2, 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 after AI (Day 0 = AI). Two hundred and fifty postpartum cows at two locations were synchronized with the Select Synch plus CIDR protocol, and AI was performed after detection of estrus. At AI, cattle were alternately assigned to one of two treatments: (1) treatment with GnRH (100 μg) at AI (n = 127 heifers and n = 108 cows); or (2) non-treated control (n = 120 heifers and n = 119 cows). Concentrations of progesterone tended to be greater in control heifers compared to GnRH-treated heifers on Days 6 (P = 0.08), 10 (P = 0.07), and 15 (P = 0.11). Overall conception rates were 68% and 66% for GnRH treated and control, respectively, and were not different between treatments (P = 0.72). In summary, treatment with GnRH at time of AI had no influence on conception rates in cattle that had exhibited estrus.     

Luteal function,largest follicle,and fertility in postpartum dairy cows treated with 14dCIDR-PGF2α versus 2xPGF2α-Ovsynch for timed AI

A method for timed artificial insemination (AI) that is used for beef cows, beef heifers, and dairy heifers employs progesterone-releasing inserts, such as the controlled internal drug release (CIDR; Zoetis, New York, NY, USA) that are left in place for 14 days. The 14-day CIDR treatment is a method of presynchronization that ensures that cattle are in the late luteal phase of the estrous cycle when PGF_2α is administered before timed AI. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of the 14dCIDR-PGF_2α program in postpartum dairy cows by comparing it with the traditional “Presynch-Ovsynch” (2xPGF_2α-Ovsynch) program. The 14dCIDR-PGF_2α cows (n = 132) were treated with a CIDR insert on Day 0 for 14 days. At 19 days after CIDR removal (Day 33), the cows were treated with a luteolytic dose of PGF_2α, 56 hours later were treated with an ovulatory dose of GnRH (Day 35), and 16 hours later were inseminated. The 2xPGF_2α-Ovsynch cows were treated with a luteolytic dose of PGF_2α on Day 0 and again on Day 14. At 12 days after the second PGF_2α treatment (Day 26), the cows were treated with GnRH. At 7 days after GnRH, the cows were treated with PGF_2α (Day 33), then 56 hours later treated with GnRH (Day 35), and then 16 hours later were inseminated. There was no effect of treatment or treatment by parity interaction on pregnancies per AI (P/AI) when pregnancy diagnosis was performed on Day 32 (115/263; 43.7%) or Days 60 to 90 (99/263; 37.6%) after insemination. There was an effect of parity (P < 0.05) on P/AI because primiparous cows had lesser P/AI (35/98; 35.7%) than multiparous cows (80/165; 48.5%) on Day 32. Cows observed in estrus after the presynchronization step (within 5 days after CIDR removal or within 5 days after the second PGF_2α treatment) had greater P/AI than those not observed in estrus (55/103; 53.4% vs. 60/160; 37.5%; observed vs. not observed; P < 0.01; d 32 pregnancy diagnosis). When progesterone data were examined in a subset of cows (n = 208), 55.3% of cows had a “prototypical” response to treatment (i.e., the cow had an estrous cycle that was synchronized by the presynchronization treatment and then the cow responded appropriately to the subsequent PGF_2α and GnRH treatments before timed AI). Collectively, cows with a prototypical response to either treatment had 52.2% P/AI that was greater (P < 0.001) than the P/AI for cows that had a nonprototypical response (19%) (P/AI determined at 60–90 days of pregnancy). In conclusion, we did not detect a difference in P/AI when postpartum dairy cows were treated with 14dCIDR-PGF_2α or 2xPGF2α-Ovsynch before timed AI. The primary limitation to the success of either program was the failure of the cow to respond appropriately to the sequence of treatments.     

Fertility in dairy cows following presynchronization and administering twice the luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F2α as one or two injections in the 5-day timed artificial insemination protocol

The objectives were to evaluate pregnancy per AI (P/AI) of dairy cows subjected to the 5-day timed AI protocol under various synchronization and luteolytic treatments. Cows were either presynchronized or received supplemental progesterone during the synchronization protocol, and received a double luteolytic dose of PGF_2α, either as one or two injections. In Experiment 1, dairy cows (n = 737; Holstein = 250, Jersey = 80, and crossbred = 407) in two seasonal grazing dairy farms were randomly assigned to one of four treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The day of AI was considered study Day 0. Half of the cows were presynchronized (G6G: PGF_2α on Day −16 and GnRH on Day −14) and received the 5-day timed AI protocol using 1 mg of cloprostenol, either as a single injection (G6G-S: GnRH on Day −8, PGF_2α on Day −3, and GnRH + AI on Day 0) or divided into two injections of 0.5 mg each (G6G-T: GnRH on Day −8, PGF_2α on Day −3 and −2, and GnRH + AI on Day 0). The remaining cows were not presynchronized and received a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone from GnRH to the first PGF_2α injection of the 5-day timed AI protocol, and 1 mg of cloprostenol either as a single injection on Day -3 (CIDR-S) or divided into two injections of 0.5 mg each on Days -3 and -2 (CIDR-T). Ovaries were examined by ultrasonography on Days −8 and −3 and plasma progesterone concentrations were determined on Days −3 and 0. In Experiment 2, 655 high-producing Holstein cows had their estrous cycle presynchronized with PGF_2α at 46 ± 3 and 60 ± 3 days postpartum and were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg of dinoprost during the 5-day timed AI protocol, either as a single injection or divided into two injections of 25 mg each. Pregnancies per AI were determined on Days 35 and 64 after AI in both experiments. In Experiment 1, presynchronization with G6G increased the proportion of cows with a CL on Day −8 (80.6 vs. 58.8%), ovulation to the first GnRH of the protocol (64.2 vs. 50.2%), and the presence (95.6 vs. 88.4%) and number (1.79 vs. 1.30) of CL at PGF_2α compared with CIDR cows. Luteolysis was greater for two injections compared to a single PGF_2α injection (two PGF_2α = 95.9 vs. single PGF_2α = 72.2%), especially in presynchronized cows (G6G-T = 96.2 vs. G6G-S = 61.7%). For cows not presynchronized, two PGF_2α injections had no effect on P/AI (CIDR-S = 30.2 vs. CIDR-T = 34.3%), whereas for presynchronized cows, it improved P/AI (G6G-S = 28.7 vs. G6G-T = 45.4%). In Experiment 2, the two-PGF_2α injection increased P/AI on Days 35 (two PGF_2α = 44.5 vs. single PGF_2α = 36.4%) and 64 (two PGF_2α = 40.3% vs. single PGF_2α = 32.6%) after AI. Presynchronization and dividing the dose of PGF_2α (either cloprostenol or dinoprost) into two injections increased P/AI in lactating dairy cows subjected to the 5-day timed AI protocol.     

Effect of hCG vs. GnRH at the beginning of the Ovsynch on first ovulation and conception rates in cyclic lactating dairy cows

Ovulatory response to the first GnRH of Ovsynch is a very important factor for determining the outcome of a successful synchronization. The aim of the present study was to develop a protocol to increase the percentage of cows that ovulated in response to the first administration of Ovsynch. This study was designed to compare ovulation rates in response to GnRH or hCG at the beginning of Ovsynch and to evaluate the effects of this manipulation on pregnancy. Cows (n = 371) with corpus luteum (CL) and at least one follicle greater than 10 mm diameter size on either ovary were included in the study. Cows were divided into two groups. The Ovsynch protocol began with GnRH (10 μg) in the GPG group (n = 161; GnRH-7d-PGF2α-56h-GnRH-18h-AI), whereas in the HPG group, the first GnRH of the Ovsynch was replaced with 1500 IU hCG (n = 210; hCG-7d-PGF2α-56h-GnRH-18h-AI). Ovarian ultrasonography was performed at the times of GnRH or hCG and of PGF2α administration, at the time of artificial insemination (AI) and seven days after AI, to determine ovulation. Maximal follicle size at the beginning of the Ovsynch did not affect on response to the first GnRH/hCG treatment. Conception rate (31 d) was 0.6 times more likely to be higher (P < 0.001) in cows that responded to the first hormonal administration of Ovsynch than in those that did not respond (95% CI = 0.29-0.71). Conception rate was found to be different between the HPG (37.6%, 79/210) and the GPG groups (48.4%, 78/161). Thus, beginning of the Ovsynch protocol with hCG did not increase ovulation and conception rate in lactating dairy cows, suggesting that hCG is not a suitable replacement of the first GnRH of Ovsynch. However, our results do show that increasing the ovulation rate in response to the first hormonal administration of Ovsynch can have a significant effect on conception rate.     

Neither duration of progesterone insert nor initial GnRH treatment affected pregnancy per timed-insemination in dairy heifers subjected to a Co-synch protocol

Our objectives were to: 1) compare response to cloprostenol, synchrony of ovulation, and pregnancy per timed-AI (P/TAI) in a 5 d versus a 7 d Co-synch + PRID protocol (Experiment 1); and 2) investigate whether the initial GnRH is necessary to achieve acceptable P/TAI in a 5 d Co-synch + PRID protocol (Experiment 2) in dairy heifers. In Experiment 1, 64 Holstein heifers, 15 to 17 mo, were assigned by age to receive 100 μg of GnRH and a PRID for 5 or 7 d (PRID5 and PRID7, respectively). At PRID removal 500 μg of cloprostenol (PGF) was given i.m. Heifers received the second GnRH treatment concurrently with TAI at 72 (PRID5) or 56 (PRID7) h after PRID removal. Transrectal ultrasonography monitored ovarian dynamics, ovulation synchrony, and pregnancy status (28 and 45 d after TAI). Plasma progesterone concentrations were determined at PRID removal and TAI. Five of seven heifers that ovulated before TAI became pregnant, and only two heifers did not respond to PGF treatment in the PRID5 group. Five PRID5 and 2 PRID7 heifers failed to ovulate after the second GnRH. However, P/TAI did not differ between PRID5 (59.4%) and PRID7 (58.1%). Overall ovulation response to first GnRH treatment was only 31.7%, and a larger proportion of heifers that did not ovulate became pregnant (65.1 versus 45.0%). In Experiment 2, 56 Holstein heifers, assigned as in Experiment 1, were subjected to a PRID5 protocol with (PRID5G) or without (PRID5NoG) GnRH at PRID insertion; all heifers were TAI 72 h after PRID removal. Transrectal ultrasonography and progesterone determinations were performed as in Experiment 1. Pregnancy per TAI did not differ whether or not heifers received GnRH at PRID insertion (67.9 versus 71.4%). Consistent with our previous findings, seven of nine heifers that ovulated before TAI became pregnant, and only two heifers did not respond to PGF treatment. Combining both experiments, length of proestrus but not ovulatory follicle diameter was identified as a significant predictor of probability of pregnancy 28 d after TAI, with a maximum predicted probability of 80.1% when the length of proestrus was 3 d. In summary, a PRID5 protocol resulted in comparable P/TAI to a PRID7 protocol. Most of the heifers that ovulated before TAI in the PRID5, PRID5G, and PRID5NoG protocols became pregnant. More than one PGF or a GnRH treatment at PRID insertion in a 5 d Co-synch + PRID protocol was not required to achieve acceptable P/TAI in dairy heifers.     

Multiple ovulation resulting from low level administration of PMSG to cattle at different stages of the oestrous cycle

Two experiments were carried out to determine whether differences in sensitivity to exogenous gonadotrophin which exist during the oestrous cycle can be used effectively in the induction of multiple pregnancy in cattle. In Experiment I, Hereford heifers and cows were injected with 800 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) on approximately day 10 of the oestrous cycle, followed 48 h later by 30 mg prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α). Controls were treated with PGF_2α alone. Mean ovulation rates based on rectal palpation were 1.33 ± 0.10 (range: 1–2) and 3.05 ± 0.68 (range: 1–13) for 21 control and 21 treated animals, respectively (P < 0.02). In Experiment II, Hereford cows were treated with 800 IU PMSG on either day 5 (14 cows) or day 10 (12 cows) of the oestrous cycle, followed 48 h later by PGF_2α. Mean numbers of ovulations for animals that became pregnant were 1.50 ± 0.26 (range 1–3) and 3.80 ± 0.74 (range 1–7), respectively (P < 0.02). A high incidence of embryonic wastage occurred by 120 days of gestation in animals treated on day 10. The results of this study indicate that taking advantage of an animal's reduced responsiveness to exogenous gonadotrophin during the early portion of the oestrous cycle may be useful in developing methods for inducing multiple births with exogenous gonadotrophins.     

Synchronization rate, size of the ovulatory follicle, and pregnancy rate after synchronization of ovulation beginning on different days of the estrous cycle in lactating dairy cows

Recently a protocol was developed that precisely synchronizes the time of ovulation in lactating dairy cows (Ovsynch; GnRH-7d-PGF2 alpha-2d-GnRH). We evaluated whether initiation of Ovsynch on different days of the estrous cycle altered the effectiveness of this protocol. The percentage of cows (n = 156) ovulating to the first GnRH was 64% and varied (P < 0.01) by stage of estrous cycle. Treatment with PGF2 alpha was effective, with 93% of cows having low progesterone at second GnRH. The overall percentage of cows that ovulated after second GnRH (synchronization rate) was 87% and varied by response to first GnRH (92% if ovulation to first GnRH vs 79% if no ovulation; P < 0.05). There were 6% of cows that ovulated before the second injection of GnRH and 7% with no detectable ovulation by 48 h after second GnRH. Maximal diameter of the ovulatory follicle varied by stage of estrous cycle, with cows in which Ovsynch was initiated at midcycle having the smallest follicles. In addition, milk production and serum progesterone concentration on the day of PGF2 alpha affected (P < 0.05) size of the ovulatory follicle. Using these results we analyzed pregnancy rate at Days 28 and 98 after AI for cows (n = 404) in which Ovsynch was initiated on known days of the estrous cycle. Pregnancy rate was lower for cows expected to ovulate larger follicles than those expected to ovulate smaller follicles (P < 0.05; 32 vs 42%). Thus, although overall synchronization rate with Ovsynch was above 85%, there were clear differences in response according to day of protocol initiation. Cows in which Ovsynch was initiated near midcycle had smaller ovulatory follicles and greater pregnancy rates.     

Effect of PGF2α and GnRH on the reproductive performance of postpartum dairy cows subjected to synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination during the warm or cold periods of the year

This study was designed to evaluate the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows (Holstein Friesian) after the injection of PGF_2α analogue on Day 15 postpartum, and GnRH analogue on Day 23 after artificial insemination (AI) with Presynch (two injections of PGF_2α, administered 14 days apart starting at 30–35 days postpartum) + Ovsynch-based (GnRH–7 days–PGF_2α–2 days–GnRH–16–20 hours–timed artificial insemination) treatments, during the warm and cold periods of the year. All the cows (n = 313) were assigned to one of the four groups including: M₁ (n = 72) in which the cows were treated with PGF_2α on Day 15 postpartum + Presynch-Ovsynch + GnRH on Day 23 post-AI; M₂ (n = 41) in which the cows received PGF_2α on Day 15 postpartum + Presynch-Ovsynch; M₃ (n = 100) including the cows that got Presynch-Ovsynch; and control group (n = 100) including the cows that were not treated and were inseminated at natural estrus. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 28 to 35 days post-insemination by means of ultrasound. The results showed that treatment with PGF_2α on Day 15 postpartum significantly decreased the days to conception and the number of services per conception (P < 0.01) and it also improved the first service conception rate (P < 0.1) only in cows that were treated with M₂ protocol. Whereas, the days to first service was not influenced by the treatment of PGF_2α on Day 15 postpartum (P > 0.05). In contrast, administration of GnRH on Day 23 post-AI increased the days to conception and the number of service per conception (P < 0.01) and tended to decrease the first service conception rate (P < 0.1) in cows that were treated with M₁ compared with M₂ protocol. Therefore, it was concluded that Presynch-Ovsynch protocol could be more reproductive and beneficial when a single treatment with PGF_2α was administered at 15 days postpartum (15 days after the PGF_2α, Presynch-Ovsynch protocol was initiated). Interestingly, the administration of a GnRH agonist on Day 23 post-AI not only did not improve the reproductive performance of the cows receiving first postpartum timed artificial insemination after Presynch-Ovsynch protocol but also reduced that.     

Effect of time interval between prostaglandin F2α and GnRH treatments on occurrence of short estrous cycles in cyclic dairy heifers and cows

Prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) and GnRH treatments, when administered 24 h apart during early diestrus, cause short estrous cycles in some dairy cows and heifers [J. Taponen, M. Kulcsar, T. Katila, L. Katai, G. Huszenicza, H. Rodriguez-Martinez, Short estrous cycles and estrous signs after premature ovulations induced with cloprostenol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone in cyclic dairy cows, Theriogenology 2002; 58, 1291-1302]. We investigated the effect of a time interval between PGF_2α and GnRH administration on the appearance of short cycles. Estrus was induced in heifers with dexcloprostenol. A second luteolysis was induced similarly on day 7 after ovulation, and either 0 (T0) or 24 h (T24) later an injection of GnRH (0.1 mg of gonadorelin) was administered. We monitored ovarian activity with progesterone analyses from blood plasma samples and with ultrasonography. Fourteen cases (12 in T0 and 2 in T24) were excluded due to either incomplete luteolysis (2 cases) or unresponsiveness to GnRH (10 in T0 and 2 in T24). Short estrous cycles (7 to 8 d) were detected in 11/11 and 8/17 heifers in groups T0 and T24, respectively, with a significant difference in the incidence of short cycles (P < 0.01). In Experiment 2, estrus was induced in cows on day 8 (D8, n = 18), 9 (D9, n = 5), or 10 (D10, n = 3) with cloprostenol and gonadorelin administered simultaneously. Daily milk samples were collected for progesterone analysis until subsequent estrus was detected and ovarian ultrasound examinations were performed. Eight cases had to be excluded due to unresponsiveness to GnRH, leaving 18 cases eligible for the study. Short estrous cycles (7-12 d) were detected in 14/18 cows. In conclusion, shortening the time interval between PGF_2α and GnRH treatments increased the incidence of short estrous cycles and appeared to increase the proportion of females unresponsive to GnRH treatment.     

Effect of intrauterine administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone on serum LH concentrations in lactating dairy cows

The objectives were to compare: (1) preovulatory serum LH concentrations, and (2) synchronization of ovulation, after im or iu administration of the second GnRH treatment of Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows. Lactating cows (N = 23) were presynchronized with two injections of PGF_2α given 14 days apart (starting at 34 ± 3 days in milk), followed by Ovsynch (GnRH-7 d-PGF_2α-56 h-GnRH) 12 days later. At the time of the second GnRH of Ovsynch (Hour 0), cows were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) control group (CON; N = 7) were given 2 mL sterile water im; (2) intramuscular group (IM; N = 8) received 100 μg of GnRH im; and (3) intrauterine group (IU; N = 8) had 100 μg GnRH infused in the uterus (2 mL). Blood samples for serum LH concentrations were collected at Hours 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4. Furthermore, ultrasonography was performed twice daily (12-h intervals) from Hours 0 to 60 to confirm ovulation. The LH concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) in the IM than IU and CON groups at Hours 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4. Although LH concentrations were numerically higher in the IU group, LH concentrations within the IU and CON groups did not change over time. More cows ovulated in the IM (8/8) and IU (7/8) groups within 60 h after the second GnRH administration compared with the CON (2/7) group. In summary, serum LH concentrations were lower in the IU versus IM group, but the proportion of cows that ovulated within 60 h was similar between these two groups. Therefore, iu administration of GnRH may be an alternative route of delivery to synchronize ovulation in beef and dairy cattle.     

Efficacy of four synchronization protocols on the estrus behavior and conception in native Korean cattle (Hanwoo)

Ineffective estrus detection is the foremost limiting factor in the fertility of farmed cattle worldwide. Failure to detect estrus or erroneous diagnosis of estrus results in great economic losses in Korea each year. This study was carried out in order to comprehensively describe the estrus behaviors and conception rates of different estrus synchronization protocols applied to 40 cycling native Korean cattle (Hanwoo). The cows were grouped into four (n = 10) and treated with the following protocols: (1) Day -15: controlled intravaginal drug-releasing device (CIDR) for 12 days; Day -5: prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α), (2) ovulation synchronization (OVS): Day -15: GnRH; Day -6: PGF_2α; Day -4: GnRH, (3) Day -15: progesterone-releasing intravaginal device for 12 days; Day -5: PGF_2α; and (4) Day -15: PGF_2α; Day -4: PGF_2α. Artificial insemination was performed 12 hours after the detection of estrus using frozen-thawed semen. Estrus signs were compared using a charge-coupled device camera (CCDC) and a control method (direct visual observation). The pregnancy of the cows was determined by transrectal ultrasonography at Days 25 to 30 postinsemination. The results indicated that the day of estrus return was significantly earlier using the CCDC method compared with direct visualization (P < 0.05). Mounting of other cows was the most predominant sign of estrus among the flock (P < 0.05), as analyzed using the CCDC. In the OVS group, a lower rate of mounting was observed than in the other three groups. Moreover, significantly fewer estrus behaviors were noticed in the OVS protocol group (P < 0.05). Both first service conception and overall conception rates were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the CIDR and OVS treatment groups. In conclusion, the CIDR and OVS protocols appear to be the best practice for the synchronization of estrus for reproductive competence through the CCDC in Hanwoo cows. However, CIDR has a practical advantage over OVS with respect to estrus detection.     

Use of a five-day progesterone-based timed AI protocol to determine if flunixin meglumine improves pregnancy per timed AI in dairy heifers

Two experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR (Controlled Internal Drug Release insert containing progesterone) protocol could be applied as an efficient timed AI (TAI) protocol in dairy heifers, and that treatment with flunixin meglumine (FM) during the period of CL maintenance would increase pregnancy per TAI (P/TAI) and late survival of embryos. Objectives were: 1) in Experiment 1, to compare P/TAI with the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol to a PGF_2α/GnRH protocol; and 2) in Experiment 2, to determine if FM administered 15.5 and 16 d after first TAI would increase P/TAI, using the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol with a new or previously used (5 d) CIDR insert.In Experiment 1, 248 heifers were assigned randomly to either the PGF_2α/GnRH protocol (n = 120) or the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol (n = 128). Pregnancy per TAI did not differ between the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol (53.1%) and the PGF_2α/GnRH protocol (45.8%; P = 0.22). In Experiment 2, 325 heifers synchronized with the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol were assigned randomly to receive two injections of FM (FM group; n = 158) at 15.5 and 16 d after TAI, or to remain as untreated controls (n = 165). Pregnancy per TAI in Experiment 2 was 59.4 and 59.5% at 45 d for control and FM groups, respectively, with no differences between groups (P = 0.83). The 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol resulted in an acceptable P/TAI in dairy heifers. However, FM did not improve P/TAI in dairy heifers.     

Incorporation of a rapid pregnancy-associated glycoprotein ELISA into a CIDR-Ovsynch resynchronization program for a 28 day re-insemination interval

The objective was to compare two resynchronization programs; one that used a blood-based ELISA for pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAG) for pregnancy diagnosis so that non-pregnant cows were re-inseminated at 28 d after first TAI, and another that used transrectal ultrasonography for pregnancy diagnosis so that non-pregnant cows were re-inseminated at 35 d after first TAI. The PAG_resynch cows (n = 103) began CIDR-Ovsynch resynchronization on Day 18 after first TAI (Day 0). On Day 25, the CIDR was removed and pregnancy diagnosis with a PAG ELISA was performed. If a cow was not pregnant on Day 25, she was treated with PGF_2α, treated with GnRH 2 d later (Day 27), and TAI on Day 28. Control cows (n = 99) were observed for estrus until Day 25, when they began an identical CIDR-Ovsynch program with pregnancy diagnosis by transrectal ultrasonography on Day 32. If a cow was not pregnant on Day 32, then she was treated with PGF_2α, treated with GnRH 2 d later (Day 34), and TAI on Day 35. There was no difference in pregnancy per AI (P/AI) for either group at first or second insemination. For cows without pregnancy loss, the interval between first and second (P < 0.001) or second and third (P < 0.016) TAI was shorter for PAG_resynch cows compared with Control cows. The interval between first and second or second and third TAI was not different if pregnancy loss cows were included in the analysis. Plasma progesterone concentrations were similar at PGF_2α treatment, and plasma estradiol concentrations increased similarly after PGF_2α treatment for PAG_resynch and Control cows. In conclusion, the 28 d CIDR-Ovsynch resynchronization protocol was comparable to a 35 d CIDR-Ovsynch resynchronization protocol that also included estrus detection. Shortened resynchronization protocols that do not require estrus detection may improve reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle.     

Exposure of beef females to the biostimulatory effects of bulls with or without deposition of seminal plasma prior to AI

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the biostimulatory effect of bull exposure, with or without the deposition of seminal plasma, on expression of estrus and pregnancy rate to AI in cattle. Beef heifers (n=86) and cows (n=193) were allocated to one of three treatments: (1) no bull exposure (CON; n=95), (2) exposure to a bull with a surgically-deviated penis for 21 d prior to AI (DB; n=88), or (3) exposure to a vasectomized bull for 21 d prior to AI (VB; n=96). The DB treatment provided the physical presence of a bull but prevented intromission, whereas the VB treatment allowed for intromission and deposition of seminal plasma but not spermatozoa. The estrous cycles of all females were synchronized using the Select Synch+CIDR protocol (GnRH+CIDR-7d-CIDR removal+PGF(2α), detection of estrus+AI 12h later for 84 h-clean-up TAI+GnRH). Pregnancy was detected via transrectal ultrasonography on d 35 post-AI. At the onset of the experiment, 75.7% of heifers and 86.1% of cows were estrous cycling. The percentages of females that displayed estrus were similar (P>0.05) among treatments (71.4%, 76.8%, and 74.4% for CON, DB, and VB, respectively). Pregnancy rates tended to be greater (P=0.06) in females in the DB treatment (60.5%) compared to females in the VB treatment (42.2%), with the control group intermediate (49.5%). In conclusion, biostimulation did not affect the expression of estrus but females exposed to the DB treatment tended to have an increased pregnancy rate.     

Effects of progesterone presynchronization and eCG on pregnancy rates to GnRH-based, timed-AI in beef cattle

Three experiments were conducted to determine the effects of low-dose progesterone presynchronization and eCG on pregnancy rates to GnRH-based, timed-AI (TAI) in beef cattle (GnRH on Day 0, PGF_2α on Day 7, with GnRH and TAI on Day 9, 54-56 h after PGF_2α). Experiments 1 and 2 were 2 × 2 factorials with presynchronization (with or without a once-used CIDR; Days −15 to 0 in Experiment 1 and Days −7 to 0, with PGF_2α at insertion, in Experiment 2), and with or without 400 IU eCG on Day 7 in suckled cows. In Experiment 3, suckled cows and nulliparous heifers were either presynchronized with a twice-used CIDR (Days −5 to 0) and PGF_2α at insertion, or no treatment prior to insertion of a new CIDR (Days 0-7). Presynchronization increased (P < 0.05) ovulation rate to GnRH on Day 0 (75.0% vs 48.7%, 76.7% vs 55.0%, and 60.0% vs 36.1% for Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively), increased the diameter of the preovulatory follicle in Experiments 1 and 2, and increased the response to PGF_2α (regardless of parity) in Experiment 1 (P < 0.01), and in primiparous cows in Experiment 2 (P < 0.01). Effects of presynchronization on pregnancy rates (53.4% vs 54.1%, 57.7% vs 45.3%, and 54.3% vs 44.4% for Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively) were influenced by parity and eCG (P < 0.05). Treatment with eCG had no effect (P > 0.05) on the diameter of the preovulatory follicle (Experiment 1), or the response to PGF_2α (Experiments 1 and 2), but tended (P = 0.08) to improve pregnancy rates, especially in primiparous cows that were not presynchronized (P < 0.01). However, the effects of eCG and presynchronization were not additive.     

Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2alpha and GnRH

This paper reports a new method for synchronizing the time of ovulation in cattle using GnRH and PGF(2alpha). In Experiments 1 and 2, lactating dairy cows (n=20) ranging from 36 to 280 d postpartum and dairy heifers (n=24) 14 to 16 mo old were treated with an intramuscular injection of 100 mug GnRH at a random stage of the estrous cycle. Seven d later the cattle received PGF(2alpha) to regress corpora lutea (CL). Lactating cows and heifers received a second injection of 100 mug GnRH 48 and 24 h later, respectively. Lactating cows were artificially inseminated 24 h after the second GnRH injection. Ovarian morphology was monitored daily by trans-rectal ultrasonography from 5 d prior to treatment until ovulation. In Experiment 3, the flexibility in the timing of hormonal injections with this synchronization protocol was evaluated by randomly assigning 66 lactating dairy cows to 3 different treatment groups. Lactating cows received the injection of PGF(2alpha) 48 (Group 1), 24 (Group 2), and 0 h (Group 3) prior to the second injection of GnRH, which was administered at the same time in each group to ensure the second injection of GnRH was given when follicles were at a similar stage of growth. In Experiments 1 and 2, the first injection of GnRH caused ovulation and formation of a new or accessory CL in 18 20 cows and 13 24 heifers. In addition, this injection of GnRH initiated or was coincident with initiation of a new follicular wave in 20 20 lactating cows and 18 24 heifers. Corpora lutea regressed after PGF(2alpha) in 20 20 cows and in 18 24 heifers. All cows and 18 24 heifers ovulated a newly formed dominant follicle between 24 and 32 h after the second injection of GnRH. Ten of 20 cows conceived to the timed artificial insemination. In Experiment 3, the conception rate in Groups 1 and 2 were greater than in Group 3, (55 and 46 % vs 11%, respectively). In summary, this protocol could have a major impact on managing reproduction in lactating dairy cows, because it allows for AI to occur at a known time of ovulation and eliminates the need for detection of estrus.     

Conception, embryonic development and corpus luteum function in beef cattle open for two consecutive breeding seasons

High-fertility (control cows) and low-fertility (cows and heifers not pregnant after two consecutive breeding seasons — twice-open) cyclic bovine females were treated with a single injection of 1000 IU of human chrionic gonadotropin (HCG) or 100 μg of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) to enhance and/or hasten corpus luteum formation and progesterone secretion, and improve conception rate in the low-fertility females. Hormone treatments were administered to 38 parous control cows, 34 twice-open parous cows, and 27 twice-open nonparous heifers immediately after natural mating by a fertile bull. Blood samples were collected on Days 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 after mating for determination of systemic progesterone concentrations. Pregnancy rate at necrospy approximately 33 days after mating (range 31–37) was higher in control cows (73.0%) than in twice-open cows (48.4%; P<0.05) or twice-open heifers (34.6%; P<0.01). Pregnancy rate was not affected by the HCG or GnRH treatment. The HCG treatment increased plasma progesterone concentrations in twice-open heifers but not in control or twice-open cows. Progesterone was unaffected by the GnRH treatment. Systemic progesterone concentrations were higher in control than in twice-open females but did not differ between pregnant and nonpregnant females of Days 3, 6, 9 and 12 after mating. Enhanced gonadotropin stimulation at estrus by injection of either HCG or GnRH did not increase pregnancy rate or systemic progesterone concentrations (except in HCG-treated twice-open heifers) in low- or high-fertility females. Lower pregnancy rates in twice-open females were not associated directly with the lower systemic progesterone concentrations.