Correlated Evolution of Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Sites in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

Recent work has shown that Drosophila melanogaster genes with fast-evolving nonsynonymous sites have lower codon usage bias. This pattern has been attributed to interference between positive selection at nonsynonymous sites and weak selection on codon usage. Here we have looked for this correlation in a much larger and less biased dataset, comprising 630 gene pairs from D. melanogaster and D. yakuba. We confirmed that there is a negative correlation between the rate of nonsynonymous substitutions (d_N) and codon bias in D. melanogaster. We then tested the interference hypothesis and other alternative explanations, including one involving gene expression. We found that d_N indeed correlates with the level of gene expression. Given that gene expression is a strong determinant of codon bias, the relationship between d_N and codon bias might be a by-product of gene expression. However, our tests show that none of the hypotheses we consider seem to explain the data fully.This article contains online supplementary material.Reviewing Editor: Dr. John Huelsenbeck     

Study of tauopathies by comparing <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> and human <Emphasis Type="Italic">tau</Emphasis> in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

The microtubule-binding protein tau has been investigated for its contribution to various neurodegenerative disorders. However, the findings from transgenic studies, using the same tau transgene, vary widely among different laboratories. Here, we have investigated the potential mechanisms underlying tauopathies by comparing Drosophila (d-tau) and human (h-tau) tau in a Drosophila model. Overexpression of a single copy of either tau isoform in the retina results in a similar rough eye phenotype. However, co-expression of Par-1 with d-tau leads to lethality, whereas co-expression of Par-1 with h-tau has little effect on the rough eye phenotype. We have found analogous results by comparing larval proteomes. Through genetic screening and proteomic analysis, we have identified some important potential modifiers and tau-associated proteins. These results suggest that the two tau genes differ significantly. This comparison between species-specific isoforms may help to clarify whether the homologous tau genes are conserved. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (30270341; 30630028), the Multidisciplinary Program (Brain and Mind) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Major State Basic Research Program (“973 program”; G2000077800; G2006CB806600; 2006CB911003), the Precedent Project of Important Intersectional Disciplines in the Knowledge Innovation Engineering of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KJCX1-09-03).     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis><Emphasis Type="Italic">P</Emphasis> transposons of the urochordata <Emphasis Type="Italic">Ciona intestinalis</Emphasis>

P transposons belong to the eukaryotic DNA transposons, which are transposed by a cut and paste mechanism using a P-element-coded transposase. They have been detected in Drosophila, and reside as single copies and stable homologous sequences in many vertebrate species. We present the P elements Pcin1, Pcin2 and Pcin3 from Ciona intestinalis, a species of the most primitive chordates, and compare them with those from Ciona savignyi. They showed typical DNA transposon structures, namely terminal inverted repeats and target site duplications. The coding region of Pcin1 consisted of 13 small exons that could be translated into a P-transposon-homologous protein. C. intestinalis and C. savignyi displayed nearly the same phenotype. However, their P elements were highly divergent and the assumed P transposase from C. intestinalis was more closely related to the transposase from Drosophila melanogaster than to the transposase of C. savignyi. The present study showed that P elements with typical features of transposable DNA elements may be found already at the base of the chordate lineage. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Functional conservation of the human <Emphasis Type="Italic">EXT1</Emphasis> tumor suppressor gene and its <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> homolog <Emphasis Type="Italic">tout</Emphasis><Emphasis Type="Italic">velu</Emphasis>

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans play a vital role in signaling of various growth factors in both Drosophila and vertebrates. In Drosophila, mutations in the tout velu (ttv) gene, a homolog of the mammalian EXT1 tumor suppressor gene, leads to abrogation of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) biosynthesis. This impairs distribution and signaling activities of various morphogens such as Hedgehog (Hh), Wingless (Wg), and Decapentaplegic (Dpp). Mutations in members of the exostosin (EXT) gene family lead to hereditary multiple exostosis in humans leading to bone outgrowths and tumors. In this study, we provide genetic and biochemical evidence that the human EXT1 (hEXT1) gene is conserved through species and can functionally complement the ttv mutation in Drosophila. The hEXT1 gene was able to rescue a ttv null mutant to adulthood and restore GAG biosynthesis.     

Evolutionary History and Mode of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">amylase</Emphasis> Multigene Family in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

Previous studies indicate that the tandemly repeated members of the amylase (Amy) gene family evolved in a concerted manner in the melanogaster subgroup and in some other species. In this paper, we analyzed all of the 49 active and complete Amy gene sequences in Drosophila, mostly from subgenus Sophophora. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the two types of diverged Amy genes in the Drosophila montium subgroup and Drosophila ananassae, which are located in distant chromosomal regions from each other, originated independently in different evolutionary lineages of the melanogaster group after the split of the obscura and melanogaster groups. One of the two clusters was lost after duplication in the melanogaster subgroup. Given the time, 24.9 mya, of divergence between the obscura and the melanogaster groups (Russo et al. 1995), the two duplication events were estimated to occur at about 13.96 ± 1.93 and 12.38 ± 1.76 mya in the montium subgroup and D. ananassae, respectively. An accelerated rate of amino acid changes was not observed in either lineage after these gene duplications. However, the G+C contents at the third codon positions (GC3) decreased significantly along one of the two Amy clusters both in the montium subgroup and in D. ananassae right after gene duplication. Furthermore, one of the two types of the Amy genes with a lower GC3 content has lost a specific regulatory element within the montium subgroup species and D. ananassae. While the tandemly repeated members evolved in a concerted manner, the two types of diverged Amy genes in Drosophila experienced frequent gene duplication, gene loss, and divergent evolution following the model of a birth-and-death process.     

In vivo analysis of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> SU(<Emphasis Type="Italic">Z</Emphasis>)12 function

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are required to maintain a stable repression of the homeotic genes during Drosophila development. Mutants in the PcG gene Supressor of zeste 12 (Su(z)12) exhibit strong homeotic transformations caused by widespread misexpression of several homeotic genes in embryos and larvae. Su(z)12 has also been suggested to be involved in position effect variegation and in regulation of the white gene expression in combination with zeste. To elucidate whether SU(Z)12 has any such direct functions we investigated the binding pattern to polytene chromosomes and compared the localization to other proteins. We found that SU(Z)12 binds to about 90 specific eukaryotic sites, however, not the white locus. We also find staining at the chromocenter and the nucleolus. The binding along chromosome arms is mostly in interbands and these sites correlate precisely with those of Enhancer-of-zeste and other components of the PRC2 silencing complex. This implies that SU(Z)12 mainly exists in complex with PRC2. Comparisons with other PcG protein-binding patterns reveal extensive overlap. However, SU(Z)12 binding sites and histone 3 trimethylated lysine 27 residues (3meK27 H3) do not correlate that well. Still, we show that Su(z)12 is essential for tri-methylation of the lysine 27 residue of histone H3 in vivo, and that overexpression of SU(Z)12 in somatic clones results in higher levels of histone methylation, indicating that SU(Z)12 is rate limiting for the enzymatic activity of PRC2. In addition, we analyzed the binding pattern of Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) and found that SU(Z)12 and HP1 do not co-localize.     

Structure of telomeric chromatin in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

The telomeric nucleoprotein complex protects linear chromosome ends from degradation. In contrast to most eukaryotes in which telomerase is responsible for telomere elongation by adding short DNA repeats synthesized using an RNA template, the telomere elongation in Drosophila involves transposition of specialized telomeric retroelements onto chromosome ends. Proteins that bind telomeric and subtelomeric sequences form specific telomeric chromatin, and its components are highly conserved among organisms employing different mechanisms of telomere elongation. This review is focused on the analysis of components of the Drosophila telomeric complex and its comparison with telomeric proteins in telomerase-encoded organisms. Structural and functional analysis of Drosophila telomeres suggests that there are three distinct chromatin regions: protective structure at the very end of chromosome (cap), subtelomeric region which is characterized by condensed chromatin structure, and the terminal retrotransposon array whose expression is under the control of an RNAi (RNA interference)-based mechanism. The link between RNAi and telomeric chromatin formation in germinal tissues is discussed.     

In vivo evidence for a regulatory role of the kinase activity of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">linotte</Emphasis>/<Emphasis Type="Italic">derailed</Emphasis> receptor tyrosine kinase,a <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> Ryk ortholog

The RYK subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases is characterised by unusual, but highly conserved, amino acid substitutions in the kinase domain. The linotte/derailed gene encodes a Drosophila RYK subfamily member involved in embryonic and adult central nervous system development. Previous studies have shown that the kinase activity of this receptor is not required in vivo for its embryonic function. In this study, we have investigated the role of the cytoplasmic domain and the kinase activity of the linotte/derailed receptor tyrosine kinase in adult brain development. Our results indicate that these domains are not essential for adult brain development but they are required for the proper regulation of the activity of this receptor. This sheds light on a regulatory role for the kinase activity of a RYK subfamily member.Edited by C DesplanEmmanuel Taillebourg and Caroline Moreau-Fauvarque contributed equally to this work     

The <Emphasis Type="Italic">Caenorhabditis</Emphasis><Emphasis Type="Italic">briggsae</Emphasis> genome contains active <Emphasis Type="Italic">CbmaT1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Tcb1</Emphasis> transposons

The maT clade of transposons is a group of transposable elements intermediate in sequence and predicted protein structure to mariner and Tc transposons, with a distribution thus far limited to a few invertebrate species. We present evidence, based on searches of publicly available databases, that the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae has several maT-like transposons, which we have designated as CbmaT elements, dispersed throughout its genome. We also describe two additional transposon sequences that probably share their evolutionary history with the CbmaT transposons. One resembles a fold back variant of a CbmaT element, with long (380-bp) inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) that show a high degree (71%) of identity to CbmaT1. The other, which shares only the 26-bp ITR sequences with one of the CbmaT variants, is present in eight nearly identical copies, but does not have a transposase gene and may therefore be cross mobilised by a CbmaT transposase. Using PCR-based mobility assays, we show that CbmaT1 transposons are capable of excising from the C. briggsae genome. CbmaT1 excised approximately 500 times less frequently than Tcb1 in the reference strain AF16, but both CbmaT1 and Tcb1 excised at extremely high frequencies in the HK105 strain. The HK105 strain also exhibited a high frequency of spontaneous induction of unc-22 mutants, suggesting that it may be a mutator strain of C. briggsae.     

Association Between Levels of Coding Sequence Divergence and Gene Misregulation in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> Male Hybrids

Previous studies have shown widespread conservation of gene expression levels between species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup as well as a positive correlation between coding sequence divergence and expression level divergence between species. Meanwhile, large-scale misregulation of gene expression level has been described in interspecific sterile hybrids between D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia. Using data from gene expression analysis involving D. simulans, D. melanogaster, and their hybrids, we observed a significant positive correlation between protein sequence divergence and gene expression differences between hybrids and their parental species. Furthermore, we demonstrate that underexpressed misregulated genes in hybrids are evolving more rapidly at the protein sequence level than nonmisregulated genes or overexpressed misregulated genes, highlighting the possible effects of sexual and natural selection as male-biased genes and nonessential genes are the principal gene categories affected by interspecific hybrid misregulation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Carlo G. Artieri and Wilfried Haerty contributed equally to this publication.     

A novel family of mitochondrial proteins is represented by the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> genes <Emphasis Type="Italic">slmo</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">preli-like</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">real-time</Emphasis>

Mitochondria play essential roles in development and disease. The characterisation of mitochondrial proteins is therefore of particular importance. The slowmo (slmo) gene of Drosophila melanogaster has been shown to encode a novel type of mitochondrial protein, and is essential in the developing central nervous system. The Slmo protein contains a conserved PRELI/MSF1p domain, found in proteins from a wide variety of eukaryotic organisms. However, the function of the proteins of this family is currently unknown. In this study, the evolutionary relationships between members of the PRELI/MSF1p family are described, and we present the first analysis of two novel Drosophila genes predicted to encode proteins of this type. The first of these, preli-like (prel), is expressed ubiquitously during embryonic development, whilst the second, real-time (retm), is expressed dynamically in the developing gut and central nervous system. retm encodes a member of a novel conserved subclass of larger PRELI/MSF1p domain proteins, which also contain the CRAL-TRIO motif thought to mediate the transport of small hydrophobic ligands. Here we provide evidence that, like Slmo, both the Prel and Retm proteins are localised to the mitochondria, indicating that the function of the PRELI/MSF1p domain is specific to this organelle.Edited by P. Simpson     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> central brain formation requires Robo proteins

The Robo proteins have been extensively studied in the Drosophila embryonic ventral nerve cord, in which their expression level controls the midline crossing and optic lobe formation, but nothing is known about their activities during adult central brain formation. We have analyzed how Robo guidance cues influence central complex (CX) and mushroom body (MB) formation. Mutations of robo2 and robo3 confer a series of strong MB and CX defects. We found that the Robo2 and Robo3 proteins are expressed in two structures of the developing CX, the fan-shaped body (FB) and the noduli (NO), and by fibers across the central neuropile. We conclude that the Robo2 and Robo3 receptors play postembryonic roles during central brain formation.     

Selective Pressures on <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> Chemosensory Receptor Genes

The evolution and patterns of selection of genes encoding 10 Drosophila odorant receptors (Or) and the sex pheromone receptor Gr68a were investigated by comparing orthologous sequences across five to eight ecologically diverse species of Drosophila. Using maximum likelihood estimates of dN/dS ratios we show that all 11 genes sampled are under purifying selection, indicating functional constraint. Four of these genes (Or33c, Or42a, Or85e, and Gr68a) may be under positive selection, and if so, there is good evidence that 12 specific amino acid sites may be under positive selection. All of these sites are predicted to be located either in loop regions or just inside membrane spanning regions, and interestingly one of the two sites in Gr68a is in a similar position to a previously described polymorphism in Gr5a that causes a shift in sensitivity to its ligand trehalose. For three Ors, possible evidence for positive selection was detected along a lineage. These include Or22a in the lineage leading to D. mauritiana and Or22b in the lineage leading to D. simulans. This is of interest in light of previous data showing a change in ligand response profile for these species in the sensory neuron (ab3A) which expresses both Or22a and Or22b in D. melanogaster. In summary, while the main chemosensory function and/or structural integrity of these 10 Or genes and Gr68a are evolutionarily preserved, positive selection appears to be acting on some of these genes, at specific sites and along certain lineages, and provides testable hypotheses for further functional experimentation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. [Reviewing Editor: Dr. David Pollock]     

Expression of the human FUSED protein in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

The Drosophila segment polarity gene fused, which encodes a serine threonine kinase, is required to transmit the Hedgehog (Hh) signal in imaginal discs. To explore the functional homology between the human protein FUSED (hFU) and the Drosophila protein fused (dFu), we have subjected hFU to a precise and well-defined Hh signalling assay of Drosophila wing development. In the wildtype, hFU affects the expression of Hh target genes leading thus to defects in adult wings. In fu mutants, overexpression of hFU cannot rescue the fu phenotype. These results suggest that hFU in Drosophila interferes with endogenous Hh signalling probably by competing with endogenous dFu when binding its partners but cannot perform the normal Fu function.Edited by C. Desplan     

Thermotolerance and place memory in adult <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> are independent of natural variation at the <Emphasis Type="Italic">foraging</Emphasis> locus

Natural polymorphisms at the foraging (for) gene influence several behaviors. However, it is seldom clear how different for alleles could be selected. In one case, Drosophila with the rover allele (for ^r ) have higher locomotor activity in the presence of food than animals with the sitter allele (for ^s ), suggesting a complementary feeding strategy. There are, in addition, differences between for ^r and for ^s Drosophila in some tests of short-term memory (for ^r animals generally perform at higher levels) and thermotolerance (for ^s larvae are more resistant to the effects of high-temperature). We asked whether there could be a direct compensating advantages in adult for ^s flies that could maintain the natural for variants. First, are adult for ^s flies more thermotolerant? Second, do for ^r flies have a higher short-term place memory? Third, as an alternative, might for ^s flies have higher place memory? Our results do not confirm these possibilities. Thus, a thermotolerance advantage of for ^s flies does not compensate for a potential for ^r short-term memory advantage; for ^r flies do not have a universal advantage in short-term memory; and for ^s flies do not have an advantage in place memory that could compensate for for ^r advantages in other learning contexts.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Rab11</Emphasis> is required for myoblast fusion in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

Rab11, an evolutionarily conserved, ubiquitously expressed subfamily of small monomeric Rab GTPases, has been implicated in regulating vesicular trafficking through the recycling of endosomal compartment. In order to gain an insight into the role of this gene in myogenesis during embryonic development, we have studied the expression pattern of Rab11 in mesoderm during muscle differentiation in Drosophila embryo. When dominant-negative or constitutively active Drosophila Rab11 proteins are expressed or Rab11 is reduced via double-stranded RNA in muscle precursors, they cause partial failure of myoblast fusion and show anomalies in the shape of the muscle fibres. Our results suggest that Rab11 plays no role in cell fate specification in muscle precursors but is required late in the process of myoblast fusion. This work was supported by grants from the DST (to J.K.R.) and SRF from ICMR, New Delhi (to T.B.).