The monomeric GTP binding protein,rab3a,is associated with the acrosome in mouse sperm

Exocytosis of the sperm acrosome is an obligate precursor to successful egg penetration and subsequent fertilization. In most mammals, acrosomal exocytosis occurs at a precise time, after sperm binding to the zona pellucida of the egg, and is induced by a specific component of the zona pellucida. It may be considered an example of regulated secretion with the acrosome of the sperm analogous to a single secretory vesicle. Monomeric G proteins of the rab3 subfamily, specifically rab3a, have been shown to be important regulators of exocytosis in secretory cells, and we hypothesized that these proteins may regulate acrosomal exocytosis. Using α[³²P] GTP binding to Immobilon blotted mouse sperm proteins, the presence of three or more monomeric GTP binding proteins was identified with M_r = 22, 24, and 26 × 10³. Alpha[³²P] GTP binding could be competed by GTP and GDP, but not GMP, ATP, or ADP. Anti‐peptide antibodies specific for rab3a were used to identify the 24 kDa G protein as rab3a. Using immunocytochemistry, rab3a was localized to the head of acrosome‐intact sperm and was lost during acrosomal exocytosis. It was identified in membrane and cytosolic fractions of sperm with the predominant form being membrane‐bound, and its membrane association did not change upon capacitation. Immunogold labeling and electron microscopy demonstrated a subcellular localization in clusters to the periacrosomal membranes and cytoplasm. These data identify the presence of rab3a in acrosomal membranes of mouse sperm and suggest that rab3a plays a role in the regulation of zona pellucida ‐induced acrosomal exocytosis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 53:413–421, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Local electrostatic interactions determine the diameter of fusion pores

In regulated exocytosis vesicular and plasma membranes merge to form a fusion pore in response to stimulation. The nonselective cation HCN channels are involved in the regulation of unitary exocytotic events by at least 2 mechanisms. They can affect SNARE-dependent exocytotic activity indirectly, via the modulation of free intracellular calcium; and/or directly, by altering local cation concentration, which affects fusion pore geometry likely via electrostatic interactions. By monitoring membrane capacitance, we investigated how extracellular cation concentration affects fusion pore diameter in pituitary cells and astrocytes. At low extracellular divalent cation levels predominantly transient fusion events with widely open fusion pores were detected. However, fusion events with predominately narrow fusion pores were present at elevated levels of extracellular trivalent cations. These results show that electrostatic interactions likely help determine the stability of discrete fusion pore states by affecting fusion pore membrane composition.     

Local electrostatic interactions determine the diameter of fusion pores

In regulated exocytosis vesicular and plasma membranes merge to form a fusion pore in response to stimulation. The nonselective cation HCN channels are involved in the regulation of unitary exocytotic events by at least 2 mechanisms. They can affect SNARE-dependent exocytotic activity indirectly, via the modulation of free intracellular calcium; and/or directly, by altering local cation concentration, which affects fusion pore geometry likely via electrostatic interactions. By monitoring membrane capacitance, we investigated how extracellular cation concentration affects fusion pore diameter in pituitary cells and astrocytes. At low extracellular divalent cation levels predominantly transient fusion events with widely open fusion pores were detected. However, fusion events with predominately narrow fusion pores were present at elevated levels of extracellular trivalent cations. These results show that electrostatic interactions likely help determine the stability of discrete fusion pore states by affecting fusion pore membrane composition.     

A role for V‐ATPase subunits in synaptic vesicle fusion?

SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptors)-mediated exocytotic release of neurotransmitters is a key process in neuronal communication, controlled by a number of molecular interactions. A synaptic vesicle v-SNARE protein (VAMP2 or synaptobrevin), in association with two plasma membrane t-SNAREs (syntaxin 1 and SNAP25), assemble to form a protein complex that is largely accepted as the minimal membrane fusion machine. Acidification of the synaptic vesicle lumen by the large multi-subunit vacuolar proton pump (V-ATPase) is required for loading with neurotransmitters. Recent data demonstrate a direct interaction between the c-subunit of the V-ATPase and VAMP2 that appears to play a role at a late step in transmitter release. In this review, we examine evidence suggesting that the V0 membrane sector of the V-ATPase not only participates in proton pumping, but plays a second distinct role in neurosecretion, downstream of filling and close to vesicle fusion.     

Calcium channel subtypes differentially regulate fusion pore stability and expansion

Various studies have focused in the relative contribution of different voltage-activated Ca²⁺ channels (VACC) to total transmitter release. However, how Ca²⁺ entry through a given VACC subtype defines the pattern of individual exocytotic events remains unknown. To address this question, we have used amperometry in bovine chromaffin cells. L, N, and P/Q channels were individually or jointly blocked with furnidipine, ω-conotoxin GVIA, ω-agatoxin IVA, or ω-conotoxin MVIIC. The three channel types contributed similarly to cytosolic Ca²⁺ signals induced by 70 mmol/L K⁺. However, they exhibited different contributions to the frequency of exocytotic events and they were shown to differently regulate the final steps of the exocytosis. When compared with the other VACC subtypes, Ca²⁺ entry through P/Q channels effectively induced exocytosis, it decreased fusion pore stability and accelerated its expansion. Conversely, Ca²⁺ entry through N channels was less efficient in inducing exocytotic events, also slowing fusion pore expansion. Finally, Ca²⁺ entry through L channels inefficiently induced exocytosis, and the individual blockade of this channel significantly modified fusion pore dynamics. The distance between a given VACC subtype and the release sites could account for the differential effects of the distinct VACC on the fusion pore dynamics.     

Molecular mechanisms of membrane fusion: Steps during phospholipid and exocytotic membrane fusion

Exocytosis is considered as four separate steps: adhesion, fusion/pore formation, pore widening, and content discharge. Experiments on both synthetic and natural membranes are presented to show each of these steps. Major differences are seen in the two fusing systems. These differences are discussed in terms of molecular mechanisms of fusion.     

Multiple local contact sites are induced by GPI-linked influenza hemagglutinin during hemifusion and flickering pore formation

Membrane fusion intermediates induced by the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked ectodomain of influenza hemagglutinin (GPI-HA) were investigated by rapid freeze, freeze-substitution, thin section electron microscopy, and with simultaneous recordings of whole-cell admittance and fluorescence. Upon triggering, the previously separated membranes developed numerous hourglass shaped points of membrane contact (∼10–130 nm waist) when viewed by electron microscopy. Stereo pairs showed close membrane contact at peaks of complementary protrusions, arising from each membrane. With HA, there were fewer contacts, but wide fusion pores. Physiological measurements showed fast lipid dye mixing between cells after acidification, and either fusion pore formation or the lack thereof (true hemifusion). For the earliest pores, a similar conductance distribution and frequency of flickering pores were detected for both HA and GPI-HA. For GPI-HA, lipid mixing was detected prior to, during, or after pore opening, whereas for HA, lipid mixing is seen only after pore opening. Our findings are consistent with a pathway wherein conformational changes in the ectodomain of HA pull membranes towards each other to form a contact site, then hemifusion and pore formation initiate in a small percentage of these contact sites. Finally, the transmembrane domain of HA is needed to complete membrane fusion for macromolecular content mixing.     

What drives membrane fusion in eukaryotes?

The fusion of biological membranes is the terminal step of all vesicular trafficking reactions in eukaryotic cells. Therefore, this fusion is fundamental for the transfer of proteins and lipids between different compartments, for exocytosis and for the structural integrity of organelles. In the past decade, many parts of the molecular machinery involved in fusion have been uncovered. Although the mechanisms responsible for mutual recognition and binding of membranes inside eukaryotes are becoming reasonably well known, there is considerable uncertainty as to what causes the actual merging of the lipid bilayer. Two classes of mechanisms have been proposed. Proximity models postulate that very close apposition of membranes suffices to induce fusion. By contrast, pore models propose that continuous proteinaceous pores between apposed membranes could be the basis for fusion.     

What do we know about gliotransmitter release from astrocytes?

Astrocytes participate in information processing by actively modulating synaptic properties via gliotransmitter release. Various mechanisms of astrocytic release have been reported, including release from storage organelles via exocytosis and release from the cytosol via plasma membrane ion channels and pumps. It is still not fully clear which mechanisms operate under which conditions, but some of them, being Ca²⁺-regulated, may be physiologically relevant. The properties of Ca²⁺-dependent transmitter release via exocytosis or via ion channels are different and expected to produce different extracellular transmitter concentrations over time and to have distinct functional consequences. The molecular aspects of these two release pathways are still under active investigation. Here, we discuss the existing morphological and functional evidence in support of either of them. Transgenic mouse models, specific antagonists and localization studies have provided insight into regulated exocytosis, albeit not in a systematic fashion. Even more remains to be uncovered about the details of channel-mediated release. Better functional tools and improved ultrastructural approaches are needed in order fully to define specific modalities and effects of astrocytic gliotransmitter release pathways.     

EGFP-Tagged Vasopressin Precursor Protein Sorting Into Large Dense Core Vesicles and Secretion From PC12 Cells

1. Hypothalamic magnocellular neurons synthesize, store, and secrete large quantities of the neuropeptides, vasopressin (VP) and oxytocin (OT), which are synthesized as protein precursors also containing proteins called neurophysins. These protein precursors are sorted through the regulated secretory pathway (RSP), packaged into large dense core vesicles LDCVs, and their peptide products are secreted from nerve terminals in the posterior pituitary.2. It has been hypothesized that this efficient packaging is dependent on the interaction of the peptide with neurophysin in a complex that forms the granule core. To test this, PC12 cells were transfected with vasopressin precursor DNA constructs that either contained or deleted the neurophysin moiety and tagged with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) as reporters. The intracellular routing and secretion of the EGFP-tagged VP precursor proteins were studied by in differentiated PC12 cells by fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopic immunocytochemistry, and fluorescent imaging techniques.3. The data showed that only when the neurophysin was present in the VP precursor construct did the fluorescent fusion protein become routed to the RSP and get efficiently packaged into LDCVs and secreted. These data are consistent with the view that routing of the precursor to LDCVs requires the amino acids that encode the intravesicular chaperone, neurophysin.