The release and reassociation of 5.8 S rRNA with yeast ribosomes.

Yeast 5.8 S rRNA is released from purified 26 S rRNA when it is dissolved in water or low salt buffer (50 mM KCl, 10mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5); it is not released from 60 S ribosomal subunits under similar conditions. The 5.8 S RNA component together with 5 S rRNA can be released from subunits or whole ribosomes by brief heat treatment or in 50% formamide; the Tm for the heat dissociation of 5.8 S RNA is 47 degrees C. This Tm is only slightly lower when 5 S rRNA is released first with EDTA treatment prior to heat treatment. No ribosomal proteins are released by the brief heat treatment. A significant portion of the 5.8 S RNA reassociates with the 60 S subunit when suspended in a higher salt buffer (e.g.0.4 m KCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 6 mM magnesium acetate, 5 mM beta-mercaptoethanol). The Tm of this reassociated complex is also 47 degrees C. The results indicate that in yeast ribosomes the 5.8 S-26 S rRNA interaction is stabilized by ribosomal proteins but that the association is sufficiently loose to permit a reversible dissociation of the 5.8 S rRNA molecule.     

Stepwise dissociation of yeast 60S ribosomal subunits by LiCl and identification of L25 as a primary 26S rRNA binding protein

Treatment of yeast 60S ribosomal subunits with 0.5 M LiCl was found to remove all but six of the ribosomal proteins. The proteins remaining associated with the (26S + 5.8S) rRNA complex were identified as L4, L8, L10, L12, L16 and L25. These core proteins were split off sequentially in the order (L16 + L12), L10, (L4 + L8), L25 by further increasing the LiCl concentration. At 1.0 M LiCl only ribosomal protein L25 remains bound to the rRNA. Upon lowering the LiCl concentration the core proteins reassociate with the rRNA in the reverse order of their removal. The susceptibility of the ribosomal proteins to removal by LiCl corresponds quite well with their order of assembly into the 60S subunit in vivo as determined earlier [Kruiswijk et al. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 517, 378-389]. Binding studies in vitro using partially purified L25 showed that this protein binds specifically to 26S rRNA. Therefore our experiments for the first time directly identify a eukaryotic ribosomal protein capable of binding to high-molecular-mass rRNA. Binding studies in vitro using a blot technique demonstrated that core proteins L8 and L16 as well as protein L21, though not present in any of the core particles, are also capable of binding to 26S rRNA to approximately the same extent as L25. About nine additional 60S proteins appeared to interact with the 26S rRNA, though to a lesser extent.     

Release of ribosome-bound 5S rRNA upon cleavage of the phosphodiester bond between nucleotides A54 and A55 in 5S rRNA

Reticulocyte lysates contain ribosome-bound and free populations of 5S RNA. The free population is sensitive to nuclease cleavage in the internal loop B, at the phosphodiester bond connecting nucleotides A54 and A55. Similar cleavage sites were detected in 5S rRNA in 60S subunits and 80S ribosomes. However, 5S rRNA in reticulocyte polysomes is insensitive to cleavage unless ribosomes are salt-washed. This suggests that a translational factor protects the backbone surrounding A54 from cleavage in polysomes. Upon nuclease treatment of mouse 60S subunits or reticulocyte lysates a small population of ribosomes released its 5S rRNA together with ribosomal protein L5. Furthermore, rRNA sequences from 5.8S, 28S and 18S rRNA were released. In 18S rRNA the sequences mainly originate from the 630 loop and stem (helix 18) in the 5' domain, whereas in 28S rRNA a majority of fragments is derived from helices 47 and 81 in domains III and V, respectively. We speculate that this type of rRNA-fragmentation may mimic a ribosome degradation pathway.     

Study of mammalian ribosomal protein reactivity in situ. I. - Effect of 2-methoxy-5-nitrotropone on 40S and 60S subunits.

Liver ribosomes and subunits were reacted with increasing concentrations of 2-methoxy-5-nitrotropone. At low reagent concentrations (0.3 mM), the molar uptake by 60S subunits was more efficient than the uptake by 40S subunits, and the amount of reagent bound to 80S ribosomes was less than that bound to both free subunits considered together. At higher reagent concentrations, the molar uptake of both subunits was equivalent. Subunits and ribosomes remained fully active when reacted with up to 0.3 mM and 1 mM of the reagent, respectively. With 2 mM of the reagent, both subunits were half inactivated, although their sedimentation characteristics were unaltered. The reactivity of each ribosomal protein was assessed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and quantitative measurement of the unmodified proteins. From these results, considered together with the uptake characteristics and the inactivation curves, a number of tentative conclusions about ribosome topography can be drawn. The over-all sensitivity of the 60S subunits to the reagent is higher than that of the 40S subunits. Both subunits undergo a conformational change when they combine to form 80S ribosomes. Proteins S18, S20, S28 and L5, L9, L11, L15, L16, L25, L29, L30, L31, L34, L37 have NH2 groups exposed in native subunits. These groups are not essential for subunit function.     

Synergistic defect in 60S ribosomal subunit assembly caused by a mutation of Rrs1p, a ribosomal protein L11-binding protein, and 3'-extension of 5S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Rrs1p, a ribosomal protein L11-binding protein, has an essential role in biogenesis of 60S ribosomal subunits. We obtained conditionally synthetic lethal allele with the rrs1-5 mutation and determined that the mutation is in REX1, which encodes an exonuclease. The highly conserved leucine at 305 was substituted with tryptophan in rex1-1. The rex1-1 allele resulted in 3′-extended 5S rRNA. Polysome analysis revealed that rex1-1 and rrs1-5 caused a synergistic defect in the assembly of 60S ribosomal subunits. In vivo and in vitro binding assays indicate that Rrs1p interacts with the ribosomal protein L5–5S rRNA complex. The rrs1-5 mutation weakens the interaction between Rrs1p with both L5 and L11. These data suggest that the assembly of L5–5S rRNA on 60S ribosomal subunits coordinates with assembly of L11 via Rrs1p.     

Disproportionate accumulation of 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA in cultured normal rat kidney cells treated with picolinic acid or 5-methylnicotinamide

Normal rat kidney cells treated with the pyridine derivative picolinic acid, or 5-methylnicotinamide, an inhibitor of ADP-ribosylation, are unable to process 28S rRNA and accumulate 60S ribosomal subunits in the cytoplasm. Synthesis of polyA(+) RNA, rRNA precursors, and the processing of 18S rRNA into 40S ribosomal subunits are almost unaffected. Serum starvation and treatment of cells with histidinol, cycloleucine, nicotinic acid, or 1,10-phenanthroline do not elicit this alteration in rRNA metabolism. Ribosomal subunits synthesized before picolinic acid addition have different stabilities after picolinic acid treatment. The 40S subunits are degraded while the 60S subunits are more stable, demonstrating that a compensatory mechanism exists to maintain preferentially existing subunits when they are no longer being synthesized. The results suggest that ADP-ribosylation is necessary for proper processing of 28S rRNA and therefore for formation of mature 60S ribosomal subunits.     

An argument for the existence of a natural complex between protein L5 and 5 S RNA in rat liver 60-S ribosomal subunits

Electrophoresis of the 60-S ribosomal subunits from rat liver in the presence of citrate ions removes the 7 S ribonucleoprotein complex between protein L5 and 5 S RNA though this complex is not released by dialysis or by centrifugation through a sucrose cushion in the same buffer. Using acetate instead of citrate, the subunits remain intact in all cases. On the other hand, in the presence of EDTA, the complex is always released. The poly(U) directed polyphenylalanine synthesis is correlated in each case with the presence of this complex within the subunits. The melting curves of subunits which have been treated with citrate, acetate or EDTA and then taken back in the buffer in which they were stored suggest that the specific RNA-protein interactions are preserved in the presence of acetate and of citrate but not of EDTA. As a whole, the results support the interpretation that the association of protein L5 and 5 S RNA exists within the active subunits.     

Sulfhydryl groups on yeast ribosomal proteins L7 and L26 are significantly more reactive in the 80 S particles than in the 60 S subunits.

The sulfhydryl-directed fluorescent reagent, 5-iodoacetamidofluorescein (IAF), reacts differently with proteins from the 60 S ribosomal subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae when this subunit is free as opposed to being contained within the 80 S ribosome. When the 80 S ribosomes and the free 60 S subunits were labeled with IAF, the specific fluorescence intensity (fluorescence intensity unit/A260 60 S subunit) of the subsequently derived 60 S was 16.3 and 5.4, respectively. Gel analysis showed that proteins L7 and L26 were selectively labeled and contained greater than 90% of the total fluorescent label, when 80 S ribosomes were labeled. When free 60 S subunits were labeled, six additional proteins were labeled. Both types of modified 60 S subunits were equally capable to support protein synthesis in vitro. Reassociation of the IAF-labeled derived and free 60 S subunits with unmodified 40 S subunits resulted in a maximum of 5-7% decrease and a 3-fold increase, respectively, in the fluorescence intensity without a shift in the emission maxima. The data suggest that ribosomal proteins L7 and L26 contain SH groups that respond to ribosomal subunit association and become more reactive in the intact ribosome than in the subunit. The environments of some or all of the additionally labeled proteins are also sensitive to subunit reassociation.     

The 23 S rRNA environment of ribosomal protein L9 in the 50 S ribosomal subunit

Ribosomal protein L9 consists of two globular alpha/beta domains separated by a nine-turn alpha-helix. We examined the rRNA environment of L9 by chemical footprinting and directed hydroxyl radical probing. We reconstituted L9, or individual domains of L9, with L9-deficient 50 S subunits, or with deproteinized 23 S rRNA. A footprint was identified in domain V of 23 S rRNA that was mainly attributable to N-domain binding. Fe(II) was tethered to L9 via cysteine residues introduced at positions along the alpha-helix and in the C-domain, and derivatized proteins were reconstituted with L9-deficient subunits. Directed hydroxyl radical probing targeted regions of domains I, III, IV, and V of 23 S rRNA, reinforcing the view that 50 S subunit architecture is typified by interwoven rRNA domains. There was a striking correlation between the cleavage patterns from the Fe(II) probes attached to the alpha-helix and their predicted orientations, constraining both the position and orientation of L9, as well as the arrangement of specific elements of 23 S rRNA, in the 50 S subunit.     

Topography of 5.8 S rRNA in rat liver ribosomes. Identification of diethyl pyrocarbonate-reactive sites

The topography of 5.8 rRNA in rat liver ribosomes has been examined by comparing diethyl pyrocarbonate-reactive sites in free 5.8 S RNA, the 5.8 S-28 rRNA complex, 60 S subunits, and whole ribosomes. The ribosomal components were treated with diethyl pyrocarbonate under salt and temperature conditions which allow cell-free protein synthesis; the 5.8 S rRNA was extracted, labeled in vitro, chemically cleaved with aniline, and the fragments were analyzed by rapid gel-sequencing techniques. Differences in the cleavage patterns of free and 28 S or ribosome-associated 5.8 S rRNA suggest that conformational changes occur when this molecule is assembled into ribosomes. In whole ribosomes, the reactive sites were largely restricted to the "AU-rich" stem and an increased reactivity at some of the nucleotides suggested that a major change occurs in this region when the RNA interacts with ribosomal proteins. The reactivity was generally much less restricted in 60 S subunits but increased reactivity in some residues was also observed. The results further indicate that in rat ribosomes, the two -G-A-A-C- sequences, putative binding sites for tRNA, are accessible in 60 S subunits but not in whole ribosomes and suggest that part of the molecule may be located in the ribosomal interface. When compared to 5 S rRNA, the free 5.8 S RNA molecule appears to be generally more reactive with diethyl pyrocarbonate and the cleavage patterns suggest that the 5 S RNA molecule is completely restricted or buried in whole ribosomes.     

Ribosomal protein-dependent orientation of the 16 S rRNA environment of S15

Ribosomal protein S15 binds specifically to the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA (16 S rRNA) and directs the assembly of four additional proteins to this domain. The central domain of 16 S rRNA along with these five proteins form the platform of the 30 S subunit. Previously, directed hydroxyl radical probing from Fe(II)-S15 in small ribonucleoprotein complexes was used to study assembly of the central domain of 16 S rRNA. Here, this same approach was used to understand the 16 S rRNA environment of Fe(II)-S15 in 30 S subunits and to determine the ribosomal proteins that are involved in forming the mature S15-16 S rRNA environment. We have identified additional sites of Fe(II)-S15-directed cleavage in 30S subunits compared to the binary complex of Fe(II)-S15/16 S rRNA. Along with novel targets in the central domain, sites within the 5' and 3' minor domains are also cleaved. This suggests that during the course of 30S subunit assembly these elements are positioned in the vicinity of S15. Besides the previously determined role for S8, roles for S5, S6+S18, and S16 in altering the 16 S rRNA environment of S15 were established. These studies reveal that ribosomal proteins can alter the assembly of regions of the 30 S subunit from a considerable distance and influence the overall conformation of this ribonucleoprotein particle.     

The novel ATP-binding cassette protein ARB1 is a shuttling factor that stimulates 40S and 60S ribosome biogenesis

ARB1 is an essential yeast protein closely related to members of a subclass of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily of proteins that are known to interact with ribosomes and function in protein synthesis or ribosome biogenesis. We show that depletion of ARB1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells leads to a deficit in 18S rRNA and 40S subunits that can be attributed to slower cleavage at the A0, A1, and A2 processing sites in 35S pre-rRNA, delayed processing of 20S rRNA to mature 18S rRNA, and a possible defect in nuclear export of pre-40S subunits. Depletion of ARB1 also delays rRNA processing events in the 60S biogenesis pathway. We further demonstrate that ARB1 shuttles from nucleus to cytoplasm, cosediments with 40S, 60S, and 80S/90S ribosomal species, and is physically associated in vivo with TIF6, LSG1, and other proteins implicated previously in different aspects of 60S or 40S biogenesis. Mutations of conserved ARB1 residues expected to function in ATP hydrolysis were lethal. We propose that ARB1 functions as a mechanochemical ATPase to stimulate multiple steps in the 40S and 60S ribosomal biogenesis pathways.     

Structure of the ribosome-associated 5.8 S ribosomal RNA

The structure of the 5.8 S ribosomal RNA in rat liver ribosomes was probed by comparing dimethyl sulfate-reactive sites in whole ribosomes, 60 S subunits, the 5.8 S-28 S rRNA complex and the free 5.8 S rRNA under conditions of salt and temperature that permit protein synthesis in vitro. Differences in reactive sites between the free and both the 28 S rRNA and 60 S subunit-associated 5.8 S rRNA show that significant conformational changes occur when the molecule interacts with its cognate 28 S rRNA and as the complex is further integrated into the ribosomal structure. These results indicate that, as previously suggested by phylogenetic comparisons of the secondary structure, only the "G + C-rich" stem may remain unaltered and a universal structure is probably present only in the whole ribosome or 60 S subunit. Further comparisons with the ribosome-associated molecule indicate that while the 5.8 S rRNA may be partly localized in the ribosomal interface, four cytidylic acid residues, C56, C100, C127 and C128, remain reactive even in whole ribosomes. In contrast, the cytidylic acid residues in the 5 S rRNA are not accessible in either the 60 S subunit or the intact ribosome. The nature of the structural rearrangements and potential sites of interaction with the 28 S rRNA and ribosomal proteins are discussed.     

Identification by RNA-protein cross-linking of ribosomal proteins located at the interface between the small and the large subunits of mammalian ribosomes

Protein constituents at the subunit interface of rat liver ribosomes were analysed by cross-linking with the bifunctional reagent, diepoxybutane (distance between reactive groups 4 A). Isolated 40S and 60S subunits were labelled with 125I and recombined with unlabelled complementary subunits. The two kinds of selectively labelled 80S ribosomes were treated with diepoxybutane at low concentration. Radioactive ribosomal proteins covalently attached to the rRNA of the unlabelled complementary subparticles were isolated by repeated gradient centrifugation. The RNA-bound, labelled proteins were identified by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The experiments showed that proteins S2, S3, S4, S6, S7, S13, and S14 in the small subunit of rat liver ribosomes are located at the ribosomal interface in close proximity to 28S rRNA. Similarly, proteins L3, L6, L7, and L8 were found at the the interface of the large ribosomal subunit in the close vicinity of 18S rRNA.     

Following the dynamics of changes in solvent accessibility of 16 S and 23 S rRNA during ribosomal subunit association using synchrotron-generated hydroxyl radicals

We have probed the structure and dynamics of ribosomal RNA in the Escherichia coli ribosome using equilibrium and time-resolved hydroxyl radical (OH) RNA footprinting to explore changes in the solvent-accessible surface of the rRNA with single-nucleotide resolution. The goal of these studies is to better understand the structural transitions that accompany association of the 30 S and 50 S subunits and to build a foundation for the quantitative analysis of ribosome structural dynamics during translation. Clear portraits of the subunit interface surfaces for 16 S and 23 S rRNA were obtained by constructing difference maps between the OH protection maps of the free subunits and that of the associated ribosome. In addition to inter-subunit contacts consistent with the crystal structure, additional OH protections are evident in regions at or near the subunit interface that reflect association-induced conformational changes. Comparison of these data with the comparable difference maps of the solvent-accessible surface of the rRNA calculated for the Thermus thermophilus X-ray crystal structures shows extensive agreement but also distinct differences. As a prelude to time-resolved OH footprinting studies, the reactivity profiles obtained using Fe(II)EDTA and X-ray generated OH were comprehensively compared. The reactivity patterns are similar except for a small number of nucleotides that have decreased reactivity to OH generated from Fe(II)EDTA compared to X-rays. These nucleotides are generally close to ribosomal proteins, which can quench diffusing radicals by virtue of side-chain oxidation. Synchrotron X-ray OH footprinting was used to monitor the kinetics of association of the 30 S and 50 S subunits. The rates individually measured for the inter-subunit contacts are comparable within experimental error. The application of this approach to the study of ribosome dynamics during the translation cycle is discussed.     

Nuclease S1 mapping of 16S ribosomal RNA in ribosomes

Escherichia coli 16S rRNA and 16S-like rRNAs from other species have several universally conserved sequences which are believed to be single-stranded in ribosomes. The quantitative disposition of these sequences within ribosomes is not known. Here we describe experiments designed to explore the availability of universal 16S rRNA sequences for hybridization with DNA probes in 30S particles and 70S ribosomes. Unlike previous investigations, quantitative data on the accessibility of DNA probes to the conserved portions of 16S rRNA within ribosomes was acquired. Uniquely, the experimental design also permitted investigation of cooperative interactions involving portions of conserved 16S rRNA. The basic strategy employed ribosomes, 30S subunits, and 16S rRNAs, which were quantitatively analyzed for hybridization efficiency with synthetic DNA in combination with nuclease S1. In deproteinated E. coli 16S rRNA and 30S subunits, the regions 520-530, 1396-1404, 1493-1504, and 1533-1542 are all single-stranded and unrestricted for hybridization to short synthetic DNAs. However, the quantitative disposition of the sequences in 70S ribosomes varies with each position. In 30S subunits there appear to be no cooperative interactions between the 16S rRNA universal sequences investigated.     

Deletion of EFL1 results in heterogeneity of the 60 S GTPase-associated rRNA conformation

Previous work suggested that the release of the nucleolar Tif6 from nascent 60 S subunits occurs in the cytoplasm and requires the cytoplasmic EF-2-like GTPase, Efl1. To check whether this release involves an rRNA structural rearrangement mediated by Efl1, we analyzed the rRNA conformation of the GTPase center of 80 S ribosomes in three contexts: wild-type, Deltaefl1 and a dominant suppressor R1 of Deltaefl1. This analysis was restricted to domain II and VI of 25 S rRNA. The rRNA analysis of R1 ribosomes allows us to distinguish the effects due to depletion of Efl1 from the resulting nucleolar deficit of Tif6. Efl1 inhibits the EF-2 GTPase activity, suggesting that the two proteins share a similar ribosome-binding site. The 80 S ribosomes from either type failed to show any difference of conformation in the two rRNA domains analyzed. However, the same analysis performed on the pool of free 60 S subunits reveals several rRNA conformational differences between wild-type and Deltaefl1 subunits, whereas that from the suppressor strain is similar to wild-type. This suggests that the nucleolar deficit of Tif6 during assembly of the 60 S preribosomes is responsible for the changes in rRNA conformation observed in Deltaefl1 60 S subunits. We also purified 60 S preribosomes from the three genetic contexts by TAP-tagging Tif6. The protein content of 60 S preribosomes associated with Tif6p in a Deltaefl1 strain are obtained at a lower yield but have, surprisingly, a protein composition that is a priori similar to that of wild-type and the suppressor strain.