Filament Formation of the FtsZ/Tubulin-like Protein TubZ from the Bacillus cereus pXO1 Plasmid

Stable maintenance of low-copy-number plasmids requires partition (par) systems that consist of a nucleotide hydrolase, a DNA-binding protein, and a cis-acting DNA-binding site. The FtsZ/tubulin-like GTPase TubZ was identified as a partitioning factor of the virulence plasmids pBtoxis and pXO1 in Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus anthracis, respectively. TubZ exhibits high GTPase activity and assembles into polymers both in vivo and in vitro, and its “treadmilling” movement is required for plasmid stability in the cell. To investigate the molecular mechanism of pXO1 plasmid segregation by TubZ filaments, we determined the crystal structures of Bacillus cereus TubZ in apo-, GDP-, and guanosine 5′-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPγS)-bound forms at resolutions of 2.1, 1.9, and 3.3 Å, respectively. Interestingly, the slowly hydrolyzable GTP analog GTPγS was hydrolyzed to GDP in the crystal. In the post-GTP hydrolysis state, GDP-bound B. cereus TubZ forms a dimer by the head-to-tail association of individual subunits in the asymmetric unit, which is similar to the protofilament formation of FtsZ and B. thuringiensis TubZ. However, the M loop interacts with the nucleotide-binding site of the adjacent subunit and stabilizes the filament structure in a different manner, which indicates that the molecular assembly of the TubZ-related par systems is not stringently conserved. Furthermore, we show that the C-terminal tail of TubZ is required for association with the DNA-binding protein TubR. Using a combination of crystallography, site-directed mutagenesis, and biochemical analysis, our results provide the structural basis of the TubZ polymer that may drive DNA segregation.     

Promiscuous stimulation of ParF protein polymerization by heterogeneous centromere binding factors

The segrosome is the nucleoprotein complex that mediates accurate segregation of bacterial plasmids. The segrosome of plasmid TP228 comprises ParF and ParG proteins that assemble on the parH centromere. ParF, which exemplifies one clade of the ubiquitous ParA superfamily of segregation proteins, polymerizes extensively in response to ATP binding. Polymerization is modulated by the ParG centromere binding factor (CBF). The segrosomes of plasmids pTAR, pVT745 and pB171 include ParA homologues of the ParF subgroup, as well as diverse homodimeric CBFs with no primary sequence similarity to ParG, or each other. Centromere binding by these analogues is largely specific. Here, we establish that the ParF homologues of pTAR and pB171 filament modestly with ATP, and that nucleotide hydrolysis is not required for this polymerization, which is more prodigious when the cognate CBF is also present. By contrast, the ParF homologue of plasmid pVT745 did not respond appreciably to ATP alone, but polymerized extensively in the presence of both its cognate CBF and ATP. The co-factors also stimulated nucleotide-independent polymerization of cognate ParF proteins. Moreover, apart from the CBF of pTAR, the disparate ParG analogues promoted polymerization of non-cognate ParF proteins suggesting that filamentation of the ParF proteins is enhanced by a common mechanism. Like ParG, the co-factors may be modular, possessing a centromere-specific interaction domain linked to a flexible region containing determinants that promiscuously stimulate ParF polymerization. The CBFs appear to function as bacterial analogues of formins, microtubule-associated proteins or related ancillary factors that regulate eucaryotic cytoskeletal dynamics.     

Molecular Analysis of pSK1 par: A Novel Plasmid Partitioning System Encoded by Staphylococcal Multiresistance Plasmids

The segregation of prokaryotic plasmids typically requires a centromere-like site and two proteins, a centromere-binding protein (CBP) and an NTPase. By contrast, a single 245 residue Par protein mediates partition of the prototypical staphylococcal multiresistance plasmid pSK1 in the absence of an identifiable NTPase component. To gain insight into centromere binding by pSK1 Par and its segregation function we performed structural, biochemical and in vivo studies. Here we show that pSK1 Par binds a centromere consisting of seven repeat elements. We demonstrate this Par-centromere interaction also mediates Par autoregulation. To elucidate the Par centromere binding mechanism, we obtained a structure of the Par N-terminal DNA-binding domain bound to centromere DNA to 2.25 Å. The pSK1 Par structure, which harbors a winged-helix-turn-helix (wHTH), is distinct from other plasmid CBP structures but shows homology to the B. subtilis chromosome segregation protein, RacA. Biochemical studies suggest the region C-terminal to the Par wHTH forms coiled coils and mediates oligomerization. Fluorescence microscopy analyses show that pSK1 Par enhances the separation of plasmids from clusters, driving effective segregation upon cell division. Combined the data provide insight into the molecular properties of a single protein partition system.     

The evidence of large-scale DNA-induced compaction in the mycobacterial chromosomal ParB

The bacterial chromosome trafficking apparatus or the segrosome participates in the mitotic-like segregation of the chromosomes prior to cell division in several bacteria. ParB, which is the parS DNA-binding component of the segrosome, polymerizes on the parS-adjacent chromosome to form a nucleoprotein filament of unknown nature for the segregation function. We combined static light scattering, circular dichroism and small-angle X-ray scattering to present evidence that the apo form of the mycobacterial ParB forms an elongated dimer with intrinsically disordered regions as well as folded domains in solution. A comparison of the solution scattering of the apo and the parS-bound ParBs indicates a rather drastic compaction of the protein upon DNA binding. We propose that this binding-induced conformational transition is priming the ParB for polymerization on the DNA template.     

Plasmid partitioning and the spreading of P1 partition protein ParB

Bacterial plasmids of low copy number, P1 prophage among them, are actively partitioned to nascent daughter cells. The process is typically mediated by a pair of plasmid-encoded proteins and a cis-acting DNA site or cluster of sites, referred to as the plasmid centromere. P1 ParB protein, which binds to the P1 centromere (parS), can spread for several kilobases along flanking DNA. We argue that studies of mutant ParB that demonstrated a strong correlation between spreading capacity and the ability to engage in partitioning may be misleading, and describe here a critical test of the dependence of partitioning on the spreading of the wild-type protein. Physical constraints imposed on the spreading of P1 ParB were found to have only a minor, but reproducible, effect on partitioning. We conclude that, whereas extensive ParB spreading is not required for partitioning, spreading may have an auxiliary role in the process.     

Monitoring Plasmid Replication in Live Mammalian Cells over Multiple Generations by Fluorescence Microscopy

Few naturally-occurring plasmids are maintained in mammalian cells. Among these are genomes of gamma-herpesviruses, including Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi''s Sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), which cause multiple human malignancies ^1-3. These two genomes are replicated in a licensed manner, each using a single viral protein and cellular replication machinery, and are passed to daughter cells during cell division despite their lacking traditional centromeres ^4-8.Much work has been done to characterize the replications of these plasmid genomes using methods such as Southern blotting and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These methods are limited, though. Quantitative PCR and Southern blots provide information about the average number of plasmids per cell in a population of cells. FISH is a single-cell assay that reveals both the average number and the distribution of plasmids per cell in the population of cells but is static, allowing no information about the parent or progeny of the examined cell.Here, we describe a method for visualizing plasmids in live cells. This method is based on the binding of a fluorescently tagged lactose repressor protein to multiple sites in the plasmid of interest ⁹. The DNA of interest is engineered to include approximately 250 tandem repeats of the lactose operator (LacO) sequence. LacO is specifically bound by the lactose repressor protein (LacI), which can be fused to a fluorescent protein. The fusion protein can either be expressed from the engineered plasmid or introduced by a retroviral vector. In this way, the DNA molecules are fluorescently tagged and therefore become visible via fluorescence microscopy. The fusion protein is blocked from binding the plasmid DNA by culturing cells in the presence of IPTG until the plasmids are ready to be viewed.This system allows the plasmids to be monitored in living cells through several generations, revealing properties of their synthesis and partitioning to daughter cells. Ideal cells are adherent, easily transfected, and have large nuclei. This technique has been used to determine that 84% of EBV-derived plasmids are synthesized each generation and 88% of the newly synthesized plasmids partition faithfully to daughter cells in HeLa cells. Pairs of these EBV plasmids were seen to be tethered to or associated with sister chromatids after their synthesis in S-phase until they were seen to separate as the sister chromatids separated in Anaphase¹⁰. The method is currently being used to study replication of KSHV genomes in HeLa cells and SLK cells. HeLa cells are immortalized human epithelial cells, and SLK cells are immortalized human endothelial cells. Though SLK cells were originally derived from a KSHV lesion, neither the HeLa nor SLK cell line naturally harbors KSHV genomes¹¹. In addition to studying viral replication, this visualization technique can be used to investigate the effects of the addition, removal, or mutation of various DNA sequence elements on synthesis, localization, and partitioning of other recombinant plasmid DNAs.     

Insight into centromere-binding properties of ParB proteins: a secondary binding motif is essential for bacterial genome maintenance

ParB proteins are one of the three essential components of partition systems that actively segregate bacterial chromosomes and plasmids. In binding to centromere sequences, ParB assembles as nucleoprotein structures called partition complexes. These assemblies are the substrates for the partitioning process that ensures DNA molecules are segregated to both sides of the cell. We recently identified the sopC centromere nucleotides required for binding to the ParB homologue of plasmid F, SopB. This analysis also suggested a role in sopC binding for an arginine residue, R219, located outside the helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motif previously shown to be the only determinant for sopC-specific binding. Here, we demonstrated that the R219 residue is critical for SopB binding to sopC during partition. Mutating R219 to alanine or lysine abolished partition by preventing partition complex assembly. Thus, specificity of SopB binding relies on two distinct motifs, an HTH and an arginine residue, which define a split DNA-binding domain larger than previously thought. Bioinformatic analysis over a broad range of chromosomal ParBs generalized our findings with the identification of a non-HTH positively charged residue essential for partition and centromere binding, present in a newly identified highly conserved motif. We propose that ParB proteins possess two DNA-binding motifs that form an extended centromere-binding domain, providing high specificity.     

A Model for the Evolution of Biological Specificity: a Cross-Reacting DNA-Binding Protein Causes Plasmid Incompatibility

Few biological systems permit rigorous testing of how changes in DNA sequence give rise to adaptive phenotypes. In this study, we sought a simplified experimental system with a detailed understanding of the genotype-to-phenotype relationship that could be altered by environmental perturbations. We focused on plasmid fitness, i.e., the ability of plasmids to be stably maintained in a bacterial population, which is dictated by the plasmid''s replication and segregation machinery. Although plasmid replication depends on host proteins, the type II plasmid partitioning (Par) machinery is entirely plasmid encoded and relies solely on three components: parC, a centromere-like DNA sequence, ParR, a DNA-binding protein that interacts with parC, and ParM, which forms actin-like filaments that push two plasmids away from each other at cell division. Interactions between the Par operons of two related plasmids can cause incompatibility and the reduced transmission of one or both plasmids. We have identified segregation-dependent plasmid incompatibility between the highly divergent Par operons of plasmids pB171 and pCP301. Genetic and biochemical studies revealed that the incompatibility is due to the functional promiscuity of the DNA-binding protein ParR_pB171, which interacts with both parC DNA sequences to direct plasmid segregation, indicating that the lack of DNA binding specificity is detrimental to plasmid fitness in this environment. This study therefore successfully utilized plasmid segregation to dissect the molecular interactions between genotype, phenotype, and fitness.     

Segrosome assembly at the pliable parH centromere

The segrosome of multiresistance plasmid TP228 comprises ParF, which is a member of the ParA ATPase superfamily, and the ParG ribbon-helix-helix factor that assemble jointly on the parH centromere. Here we demonstrate that the distinctive parH site (～100-bp) consists of an array of degenerate tetramer boxes interspersed by AT-rich spacers. Although numerous consecutive AT-steps are suggestive of inherent curvature, parH lacks an intrinsic bend. Sequential deletion of parH tetramers progressively reduced centromere function. Nevertheless, the variant subsites could be rearranged in different geometries that accommodated centromere activity effectively revealing that the site is highly elastic in vivo. ParG cooperatively coated parH: proper centromere binding necessitated the protein's N-terminal flexible tails which modulate the centromere binding affinity of ParG. Interaction of the ParG ribbon-helix-helix domain with major groove bases in the tetramer boxes likely provides direct readout of the centromere. In contrast, the AT-rich spacers may be implicated in indirect readout that mediates cooperativity between ParG dimers assembled on adjacent boxes. ParF alone does not bind parH but instead loads into the segrosome interactively with ParG, thereby subtly altering centromere conformation. Assembly of ParF into the complex requires the N-terminal flexible tails in ParG that are contacted by ParF.     

RepB proteins of the multipartite Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii genome discriminate between centromere‐like parS sequences for plasmid segregational stability

The plasmids of the Rhizobiaceae family members and other Alphaproteobacteria are usually large, low copy‐number and contain all elements necessary for active segregation and replication located in one operon comprising repABC genes. The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii TA1 (RtTA1) consists of a chromosome and four plasmids (pRleTA1a‐d) with repABC operons. In this work, centromere‐binding RepB proteins of four RtTA1 plasmids were studied. Stability assays of the truncated derivatives of repABC cassettes demonstrated that RepA, RepB proteins and parS‐like elements constituted plasmid partitioning systems, while RepC were sufficient for their replication. Individual RepB proteins bound specifically to centromere‐like parS elements of the parental plasmids, which was crucial step toward the proper segregation of plasmids into daughter cells. RtTA1 RepB proteins formed dimers and oligomers in the solution. The C‐terminal part of RepB was responsible for dimerization, while the domain engaged in parS binding was located in the middle of the protein. It was concluded that the specific interaction between individual RepB proteins and their target sequences together with the substantial diversity of the Rep proteins and parS originating from different plasmids strongly contributed to the coexistence of several plasmids equipped with similar repABC cassettes in the multipartite bacterial genome.     

Structural biology of plasmid segregation proteins

DNA segregation, or partition, ensures stable genome transmission during cell division. In prokaryotes, partition is best understood for plasmids, which serve as tractable model systems to decipher the molecular underpinnings of this process. Plasmid partition is mediated by par systems, composed of three essential elements: a centromere-like site and the proteins ParA and ParB. In the first step, ParB binds the centromere to form a large segrosome. Subsequently, ParA, an ATPase, binds the segrosome and mediates plasmid separation. Recently determined ParB-centromere structures have revealed key insights into segrosome assembly, whereas ParA structures have shed light on the mechanism of plasmid separation. These structures represent important steps in elucidating the molecular details of plasmid segregation.     

The bacterial segrosome: a dynamic nucleoprotein machine for DNA trafficking and segregation

The genomes of unicellular and multicellular organisms must be partitioned equitably in coordination with cytokinesis to ensure faithful transmission of duplicated genetic material to daughter cells. Bacteria use sophisticated molecular mechanisms to guarantee accurate segregation of both plasmids and chromosomes at cell division. Plasmid segregation is most commonly mediated by a Walker-type ATPase and one of many DNA-binding proteins that assemble on a cis-acting centromere to form a nucleoprotein complex (the segrosome) that mediates intracellular plasmid transport. Bacterial chromosome segregation involves a multipartite strategy in which several discrete protein complexes potentially participate. Shedding light on the basis of genome segregation in bacteria could indicate new strategies aimed at combating pathogenic and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.     

Plasmid and chromosome partitioning: surprises from phylogeny

Plasmids encode partitioning genes (par) that are required for faithful plasmid segregation at cell division. Initially, par loci were identified on plasmids, but more recently they were also found on bacterial chromosomes. We present here a phylogenetic analysis of par loci from plasmids and chromosomes from prokaryotic organisms. All known plasmid-encoded par loci specify three components: a cis-acting centromere-like site and two trans-acting proteins that form a nucleoprotein complex at the centromere (i.e. the partition complex). The proteins are encoded by two genes in an operon that is autoregulated by the par-encoded proteins. In all cases, the upstream gene encodes an ATPase that is essential for partitioning. Recent cytological analyses indicate that the ATPases function as adaptors between a host-encoded component and the partition complex and thereby tether plasmids and chromosomal origin regions to specific subcellular sites (i.e. the poles or quarter-cell positions). Two types of partitioning ATPases are known: the Walker-type ATPases encoded by the par/sop gene family (type I partitioning loci) and the actin-like ATPase encoded by the par locus of plasmid R1 (type II partitioning locus). A phylogenetic analysis of the large family of Walker type of partitioning ATPases yielded a surprising pattern: most of the plasmid-encoded ATPases clustered into distinct subgroups. Surprisingly, however, the par loci encoding these distinct subgroups have different genetic organizations and thus divide the type I loci into types Ia and Ib. A second surprise was that almost all chromosome-encoded ATPases, including members from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive Bacteria and Archaea, clustered into one distinct subgroup. The phylogenetic tree is consistent with lateral gene transfer between Bacteria and Archaea. Using database mining with the ParM ATPase of plasmid R1, we identified a new par gene family from enteric bacteria. These type II loci, which encode ATPases of the actin type, have a genetic organization similar to that of type Ib loci.     

Determination of the binding constants of the centromere protein Cbf1 to all 16 centromere DNAs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cbf1p is a Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin protein belonging to the basic region helix–loop–helix leucine zipper (bHLHzip) family of DNA binding proteins. Cbf1p binds to a conserved element in the 5′-flanking region of methionine biosynthetic genes and to centromere DNA element I (CDEI) of S.cerevisiae centromeric DNA. We have determined the apparent equilibrium dissociation constants of Cbf1p binding to all 16 CDEI DNAs in gel retardation assays. Binding constants of full-length Cbf1p vary between 1.7 and 3.8 nM. However, the dissociation constants of a Cbf1p deletion variant that has been shown to be fully sufficient for Cbf1p function in vivo vary in a range between 3.2 and 12 nM. In addition, native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed distinct changes in the 3D structure of the Cbf1p/CEN complexes. We also show that the previously reported DNA binding stimulation activity of the centromere protein p64 functions on both the Cbf1 full-length protein and a deletion variant containing only the bHLHzip domain of Cbf1p. Our results suggest that centromeric DNA outside the consensus CDEI sequence and interaction of Cbf1p with adjacent centromere proteins contribute to the complex formation between Cbf1p and CEN DNA.     

The Structure and Assembly Dynamics of Plasmid Actin AlfA Imply a Novel Mechanism of DNA Segregation

Bacterial cytoskeletal proteins participate in a variety of processes, including cell division and DNA segregation. Polymerization of one plasmid-encoded, actin-like protein, ParM, segregates DNA by pushing two plasmids in opposite directions and forms the current paradigm for understanding active plasmid segregation. An essential feature of ParM assembly is its dynamically instability, the stochastic switching between growth and disassembly. It is unclear whether dynamic instability is an essential feature of all actin-like protein-based segregation mechanisms or whether bacterial filaments can segregate plasmids by different mechanisms. We expressed and purified AlfA, a plasmid-segregating actin-like protein from Bacillus subtilis, and found that it forms filaments with a unique structure and biochemistry; AlfA nucleates rapidly, polymerizes in the presence of ATP or GTP, and forms highly twisted, ribbon-like, helical filaments with a left-handed pitch and protomer nucleotide binding pockets rotated away from the filament axis. Intriguingly, AlfA filaments spontaneously associate to form uniformly sized, mixed-polarity bundles. Most surprisingly, our biochemical characterization revealed that AlfA does not display dynamic instability and is relatively stable in the presence of diphosphate nucleotides. These results (i) show that there is remarkable structural diversity among bacterial actin filaments and (ii) indicate that AlfA filaments partition DNA by a novel mechanism.Bacteria contain multiple filament-forming proteins related to eukaryotic actin (6). These actin-like proteins have multiple cellular roles, including determination of cell shape (18), arrangement of organelles (20), and segregation of DNA (36). Little is known about the assembly dynamics of most of these proteins or about the identities and activities of the factors that regulate them. The widely expressed actin-like protein MreB, for example, has been purified and studied in vitro, but its assembly appears to be strongly inhibited by physiological concentrations of monovalent cations, suggesting that its assembly in vivo is facilitated by as-yet-unknown factors (23). At present, the best-understood actin-like protein is ParM, a plasmid-encoded protein that constructs a bipolar spindle capable of pushing plasmids to opposite poles of rod-shaped cells (5, 25). In contrast to the eukaryotic actin cytoskeleton, whose assembly and architecture are regulated by a variety of accessory factors, ParM dynamics are regulated by a single factor, a complex composed of multiple copies of the repressor protein ParR bound to a DNA locus, parC (17). The ParR/parC complex binds the ends of ParM filaments and is pushed through the cytoplasm by filament elongation (5, 14, 25). The ability of ParM to function with such minimal regulation appears to be due to its unique assembly dynamics, which are dramatically different from those of eukaryotic actins. One of the most important differences is that ParM filaments are dynamically unstable (13). That is, similar to eukaryotic microtubules, they can exist in one of two states: stably growing or rapidly (catastrophically) shrinking. This property is required for the ability of ParM to segregate DNA in vivo and appears to solve several fundamental problems associated with DNA segregation. First, spontaneous disassembly of the polymer overcomes the need for an accessory factor to take filaments apart. Second, because filaments bound to ParR/parC complexes are selectively stabilized, the catastrophic disassembly of unattached filaments provides excess monomers that can preferentially elongate them. This is significant because, if the stabilities of attached and unattached filaments were similar, the concentration of free ParM monomers would equilibrate at a level not capable of promoting DNA segregation. And finally, pairs of plasmids appear to find each other via a search-and-capture mechanism (5, 14) that is dramatically enhanced by the continual growth and shortening of filaments attached to single plasmids (16).Because we have little information on the dynamics of other actin-like proteins, it is unclear to what extent ParM''s behavior reflects general properties of bacterial actins rather than specific adaptations to its role in DNA segregation. Furthermore, it is unclear whether all plasmid-segregating actins employ the same dynamic instability-based strategy to find and transport DNA molecules. To better understand the structural and functional diversity of bacterial actins, we studied a second, recently discovered plasmid-segregating actin-like protein, AlfA (1). The AlfA gene is part of an operon (alf) that is located close to the origin of replication of a ∼70-kb, low-copy-number plasmid, pLS32. This plasmid was initially isolated from a natto strain of Bacillus subtilis used in soybean fermentation (33), but a similar plasmid with an identical alf operon is also present in a colony-forming laboratory strain of B. subtilis, strain NCIB 3610 (8, 32). The function of these plasmids is cryptic. They are present at levels of only two or three copies per chromosome equivalent (33), and maintenance of their derivatives requires both AlfA and a downstream gene, alfB (1). Becker and coworkers (1) identified AlfA as a member of the actin superfamily based on the presence of a conserved nucleotide binding fold (4), although the sequence of AlfA is as different from the sequences of ParM and MreB as all three are from the sequence of conventional eukaryotic actin (∼20% identity). These authors also showed that fluorescent derivatives of AlfA form a single filamentous structure running along the long axis of the cell. Photobleached filaments recover from both ends in approximately 1 min, indicating that the structures are composed of multiple, dynamic filaments (1). By analogy with the ParR/parC complex, AlfB might be a DNA binding protein that couples AlfA assembly to plasmid movement. To date, no centromeric sequences involved in segregation have been identified in this plasmid.We expressed and purified AlfA and characterized its assembly dynamics by using light scattering, high-speed pelleting, and fluorescence microscopy, and we determined the structure of AlfA polymers by high-resolution electron microscopy (EM). We found that in the presence of ATP and GTP, AlfA forms two-strand helical filaments and filament bundles. Like ParM filaments, AlfA filaments are left-handed two-start helices, but otherwise their filament architecture is quite different. AlfA filaments appear to be more tightly twisted and ribbon-like, and AlfA subunits have a significantly different orientation with respect to the filament axis. Unlike other actin-like proteins described thus far, AlfA spontaneously forms regularly sized, mixed-polarity filament bundles driven by electrostatic interactions between filaments, even in the absence of molecular crowding. Finally, AlfA shows no evidence of the dynamic instability crucial to the function of ParM. Thus, AlfA assembles into a unique structure with a unique set of biochemical and structural properties, suggesting a novel mechanism for DNA segregation.     

Analysis of the aplyronine A-induced protein–protein interaction between actin and tubulin by surface plasmon resonance

The antitumor macrolide aplyronine A induces protein–protein interaction (PPI) between actin and tubulin to exert highly potent biological activities. The interactions and binding kinetics of these molecules were analyzed by the surface plasmon resonance with biotinylated aplyronines or tubulin as ligands. Strong binding was observed for tubulin and actin with immobilized aplyronine A. These PPIs were almost completely inhibited by one equivalent of either aplyronine A or C, or mycalolide B. In contrast, a non-competitive actin-depolymerizing agent, latrunculin A, highly accelerated their association. Significant binding was also observed for immobilized tubulin with an actin–aplyronine A complex, and the dissociation constant K_D was 1.84 μM. Our method could be used for the quantitative analysis of the PPIs between two polymerizing proteins stabilized with small agents.