Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model

Recent works have shown the ability of physics-based potentials (e.g., CHARMM and OPLS-AA) and energy minimization to differentiate the native protein structures from large ensemble of non-native structures. In this study, we extended previous work by other authors and developed an energy scoring function using a new set of AMBER parameters (also recently developed in our laboratory) in conjunction with molecular dynamics and the Generalized Born solvent model. We evaluated the performance of our new scoring function by examining its ability to distinguish between the native and decoy protein structures. Here we present a systematic comparison of our results with those obtained with use of other physics-based potentials by previous authors. A total of 7 decoy sets, 117 protein sequences, and more than 41,000 structures were evaluated. The results of our study showed that our new scoring function represents a significant improvement over previously published physics-based scoring functions.     

Virtual screening against highly charged active sites: identifying substrates of alpha-beta barrel enzymes

We have developed a virtual ligand screening method designed to help assign enzymatic function for alpha-beta barrel proteins. We dock a library of approximately 19,000 known metabolites against the active site and attempt to identify the relevant substrate based on predicted relative binding free energies. These energies are computed using a physics-based energy function based on an all-atom force field (OPLS-AA) and a generalized Born implicit solvent model. We evaluate the ability of this method to identify the known substrates of several members of the enolase superfamily of enzymes, including both holo and apo structures (11 total). The active sites of these enzymes contain numerous charged groups (lysines, carboxylates, histidines, and one or more metal ions) and thus provide a challenge for most docking scoring functions, which treat electrostatics and solvation in a highly approximate manner. Using the physics-based scoring procedure, the known substrate is ranked within the top 6% of the database in all cases, and in 8 of 11 cases, it is ranked within the top 1%. Moreover, the top-ranked ligands are strongly enriched in compounds with high chemical similarity to the substrate (e.g., different substitution patterns on a similar scaffold). These results suggest that our method can be used, in conjunction with other information including genomic context and known metabolic pathways, to suggest possible substrates or classes of substrates for experimental testing. More broadly, the physics-based scoring method performs well on highly charged binding sites and is likely to be useful in inhibitor docking against polar binding sites as well. The method is fast (<1 min per ligand), due largely to an efficient minimization algorithm based on the truncated Newton method, and thus, it can be applied to thousands of ligands within a few hours on a small Linux cluster.     

Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions

Physical energy scoring functions based on implicit solvation models are tested by evaluating predictions from the most recent CASP4 competition. The best performing scoring functions are identified along with the best protocol for preparing structures before energies are evaluated. Ranking of structures with the best scoring functions is compared across CASP4 targets to establish when physical scoring functions can be expected to reliably distinguish structures that are most similar to the native fold in a set of misfolded or unfolded protein conformations. The results are used to interpret previous studies where scoring functions were tested on the standard decoy sets by Park, Levitt, and Baker. We show that the best physical scoring functions can be applied successfully in automated consensus scoring applications where a single best conformation has to be selected from a set of structures from different sources. Finally, the potential for better protein structure scoring functions is discussed with a suggestion for an empirically parameterized linear combination of energy components.     

Scoring function accuracy for membrane protein structure prediction

We perform a systematic examination of the ability of several different high-resolution, atomic-detail scoring functions to discriminate native conformations of loops in membrane proteins from non-native but physically reasonable, or "decoy," conformations. Decoys constructed from changing a loop conformation while keeping the remainder of the protein fixed are a challenging test of energy function accuracy. Nevertheless, the best of the energy functions we examined recognized the native structure as lowest in energy around half the time, and consistently chose it as a low-energy structure. This suggests that the best of present energy functions, even without a representation of the lipid bilayer, are of sufficient accuracy to give reasonable confidence in predictions of membrane protein structure. We also constructed homology models for each structure, using other known structures in the same protein family as templates. Homology models were constructed using several scoring functions and modeling programs, but with a comparable sampling effort for each procedure. Our results indicate that the quality of sequence alignment is probably the most important factor in model accuracy for sequence identity from 20-40%; one can expect a reasonably accurate model for membrane proteins when sequence identity is greater than 30%, in agreement with previous studies. Most errors are localized in loop regions, which tend to be found outside the lipid bilayer. For the most discriminative energy functions, it appears that errors are most likely due to lack of sufficient sampling, although it should be stressed that present energy functions are still far from perfectly reliable.     

Guiding probabilistic search of the protein conformational space with structural profiles

The roughness of the protein energy surface poses a significant challenge to search algorithms that seek to obtain a structural characterization of the native state. Recent research seeks to bias search toward near-native conformations through one-dimensional structural profiles of the protein native state. Here we investigate the effectiveness of such profiles in a structure prediction setting for proteins of various sizes and folds. We pursue two directions. We first investigate the contribution of structural profiles in comparison to or in conjunction with physics-based energy functions in providing an effective energy bias. We conduct this investigation in the context of Metropolis Monte Carlo with fragment-based assembly. Second, we explore the effectiveness of structural profiles in providing projection coordinates through which to organize the conformational space. We do so in the context of a robotics-inspired search framework proposed in our lab that employs projections of the conformational space to guide search. Our findings indicate that structural profiles are most effective in obtaining physically realistic near-native conformations when employed in conjunction with physics-based energy functions. Our findings also show that these profiles are very effective when employed instead as projection coordinates to guide probabilistic search toward undersampled regions of the conformational space.     

Applying Physics-Based Scoring to Calculate Free Energies of Binding for Single Amino Acid Mutations in Protein-Protein Complexes

Predicting changes in protein binding affinity due to single amino acid mutations helps us better understand the driving forces underlying protein-protein interactions and design improved biotherapeutics. Here, we use the MM-GBSA approach with the OPLS2005 force field and the VSGB2.0 solvent model to calculate differences in binding free energy between wild type and mutant proteins. Crucially, we made no changes to the scoring model as part of this work on protein-protein binding affinity—the energy model has been developed for structure prediction and has previously been validated only for calculating the energetics of small molecule binding. Here, we compare predictions to experimental data for a set of 418 single residue mutations in 21 targets and find that the MM-GBSA model, on average, performs well at scoring these single protein residue mutations. Correlation between the predicted and experimental change in binding affinity is statistically significant and the model performs well at picking “hotspots,” or mutations that change binding affinity by more than 1 kcal/mol. The promising performance of this physics-based method with no tuned parameters for predicting binding energies suggests that it can be transferred to other protein engineering problems.     

Development of a physics-based force field for the scoring and refinement of protein models

The minimal requirements of a physics-based potential that can refine protein structures are the existence of a correlation between the energy with native similarity and the scoring of the native structure as the lowest in energy. To develop such a force field, the relative weights of the Amber ff03 all-atom potential supplemented by an explicit hydrogen-bond potential were adjusted by global optimization of energetic and structural criteria for a large set of protein decoys generated for a set of 58 nonhomologous proteins. The average correlation coefficient of the energy with TM-score significantly improved from 0.25 for the original ff03 potential to 0.65 for the optimized force field. The fraction of proteins for which the native structure had lowest energy increased from 0.22 to 0.90. Moreover, use of an explicit hydrogen-bond potential improves scoring performance of the force field. Promising preliminary results were obtained in applying the optimized potentials to refine protein decoys using only an energy criterion to choose the best decoy among sampled structures. For a set of seven proteins, 63% of the decoys improve, 18% get worse, and 19% are not changed.     

Discrimination of native loop conformations in membrane proteins: decoy library design and evaluation of effective energy scoring functions

The recent determination of crystal structures for several important membrane proteins opens the way for comparative modeling of their membrane-spanning regions. However, the ability to predict correctly the structures of loop regions, which may be critical, for example, in ligand binding, remains a considerable challenge. To meet this challenge, accurate scoring methods have to discriminate between candidate conformations of an unknown loop structure. Some success in loop prediction has been reported for globular proteins; however, the proximity of membrane protein loops to the lipid bilayer casts doubt on the applicability of the same scoring methods to this problem. In this work, we develop "decoy libraries" of non-native folds generated, using the structures of two membrane proteins, with molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo techniques over a range of temperatures. We introduce a new approach for decoy library generation by constructing a flat distribution of conformations covering a wide range of Calpha-root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) from the native structure; this removes possible bias in subsequent scoring stages. We then score these decoy conformations with effective energy functions, using increasingly more cpu-intensive implicit solvent models, including (1) simple Coulombic electrostatics with constant or distance-dependent dielectrics; (2) atomic solvation parameters; (3) the effective energy function (EEF1) of Lazaridis and Karplus; (4) generalized Born/Analytical Continuum Solvent; and (5) finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann energy functions. We show that distinction of native-like membrane protein loops may be achieved using effective energies with the assumption of a homogenous environment; thus, the absence of the adjacent lipid bilayer does not affect the scoring ability. In particular, the Analytical Continuum Solvent and finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann energy functions are seen to be the most powerful scoring functions. Interestingly, the use of the uncharged states of ionizable sidechains is shown to aid prediction, particularly for the simplest energy functions.     

Comparison between Generalized-Born and Poisson–Boltzmann methods in physics-based scoring functions for protein structure prediction

Continuum solvent models such as Generalized-Born and Poisson–Boltzmann methods hold the promise to treat solvation effect efficiently and to enable rapid scoring of protein structures when they are combined with physics-based energy functions. Yet, direct comparison of these two approaches on large protein data set is lacking. Building on our previous work with a scoring function based on a Generalized-Born (GB) solvation model, and short molecular-dynamics simulations, we further extended the scoring function to compare with the MM-PBSA method to treat the solvent effect. We benchmarked this scoring function against seven publicly available decoy sets. We found that, somewhat surprisingly, the results of MM-PBSA approach are comparable to the previous GB-based scoring function. We also discussed the effect to the scoring function accuracy due to presence of large ligands and ions in some native structures of the decoy sets.     

Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.

An essential requirement for theoretical protein structure prediction is an energy function that can discriminate the native from non-native protein conformations. To date most of the energy functions used for this purpose have been extracted from a statistical analysis of the protein structure database, without explicit reference to the physical interactions responsible for protein stability. The use of the statistical functions has been supported by the widespread belief that they are superior for such discrimination to physics-based energy functions. An effective energy function which combined the CHARMM vacuum potential with a Gaussian model for the solvation free energy is tested for its ability to discriminate the native structure of a protein from misfolded conformations; the results are compared with those obtained with the vacuum CHARMM potential. The test is performed on several sets of misfolded structures prepared by others, including sets of about 650 good decoys for six proteins, as well as on misfolded structures of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. The vacuum CHARMM potential is successful in most cases when energy minimized conformations are considered, but fails when applied to structures relaxed by molecular dynamics. With the effective energy function the native state is always more stable than grossly misfolded conformations both in energy minimized and molecular dynamics-relaxed structures. The present results suggest that molecular mechanics (physics-based) energy functions, complemented by a simple model for the solvation free energy, should be tested for use in the inverse folding problem, and supports their use in studies of the effective energy surface of proteins in solution. Moreover, the study suggests that the belief in the superiority of statistical functions for these purposes may be ill founded.     

Receptor-specific scoring functions derived from quantum chemical models improve affinity estimates for in-silico drug discovery

The adaptation of forcefield-based scoring function to specific receptors remains an important challenge for in-silico drug discovery. Here we compare binding energies of forcefield-based scoring functions with models that are reparameterized on the basis of large-scale quantum calculations of the receptor. We compute binding energies of eleven ligands to the human estrogen receptor subtype alpha (ERalpha) and four ligands to the human retinoic acid receptor of isotype gamma (RARgamma). Using the FlexScreen all-atom receptor-ligand docking approach, we compare docking simulations parameterized by quantum-mechanical calculation of a large protein fragment with purely forcefield-based models. The use of receptor flexibility in the FlexScreen permits the treatment of all ligands in the same receptor model. We find a high correlation between the classical binding energy obtained in the docking simulation and quantum mechanical binding energies and a good correlation with experimental affinities R=0.81 for ERalpha and R=0.95 for RARgamma using the quantum derived scoring functions. A significant part of this improvement is retained, when only the receptor is treated with quantum-based parameters, while the ligands are parameterized with a purely classical model.     

A docking analysis of the statistical physics of protein-protein recognition

We describe protein-protein recognition within the frame of the random energy model of statistical physics. We simulate, by docking the component proteins, the process of association of two proteins that form a complex. We obtain the energy spectrum of a set of protein-protein complexes of known three-dimensional structure by performing docking in random orientations and scoring the models thus generated. We use a coarse protein representation where each amino acid residue is replaced by its Vorono? cell, and derive a scoring function by applying the evolutionary learning program ROGER to a set of parameters measured on that representation. Taking the scores of the docking models to be interaction energies, we obtain energy spectra for the complexes and fit them to a Gaussian distribution, from which we derive physical parameters such as a glass transition temperature and a specificity transition temperature.     

Protein structure evaluation using an all-atom energy based empirical scoring function

Arriving at the native conformation of a polypeptide chain characterized by minimum most free energy is a problem of long standing interest in protein structure prediction endeavors. Owing to the computational requirements in developing free energy estimates, scoring functions--energy based or statistical--have received considerable renewed attention in recent years for distinguishing native structures of proteins from non-native like structures. Several cleverly designed decoy sets, CASP (Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction) structures and homology based internet accessible three dimensional model builders are now available for validating the scoring functions. We describe here an all-atom energy based empirical scoring function and examine its performance on a wide series of publicly available decoys. Barring two protein sequences where native structure is ranked second and seventh, native is identified as the lowest energy structure in 67 protein sequences from among 61,659 decoys belonging to 12 different decoy sets. We further illustrate a potential application of the scoring function in bracketing native-like structures of two small mixed alpha/beta globular proteins starting from sequence and secondary structural information. The scoring function has been web enabled at www.scfbio-iitd.res.in/utility/proteomics/energy.jsp.     

How much can physics do for protein design?

Physics and physical chemistry are an important thread in computational protein design, complementary to knowledge-based tools. They provide molecular mechanics scoring functions that need little or no ad hoc parameter readjustment, methods to thoroughly sample equilibrium ensembles, and different levels of approximation for conformational flexibility. They led recently to the successful redesign of a small protein using a physics-based folded state energy. Adaptive Monte Carlo or molecular dynamics schemes were discovered where protein variants are populated as per their ligand-binding free energy or catalytic efficiency. Molecular dynamics have been used for backbone flexibility. Implicit solvent models have been refined, polarizable force fields applied, and many physical insights obtained.     

Protein Structure Evaluation using an All-Atom Energy Based Empirical Scoring Function

Abstract

Arriving at the native conformation of a polypeptide chain characterized by minimum most free energy is a problem of long standing interest in protein structure prediction endeavors. Owing to the computational requirements in developing free energy estimates, scoring functions—energy based or statistical—have received considerable renewed attention in recent years for distinguishing native structures of proteins from non-native like structures. Several cleverly designed decoy sets, CASP (Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction) structures and homology based internet accessible three dimensional model builders are now available for validating the scoring functions. We describe here an all-atom energy based empirical scoring function and examine its performance on a wide series of publicly available decoys. Barring two protein sequences where native structure is ranked second and seventh, native is identified as the lowest energy structure in 67 protein sequences from among 61,659 decoys belonging to 12 different decoy sets. We further illustrate a potential application of the scoring function in bracketing native-like structures of two small mixed alpha/beta globular proteins starting from sequence and secondary structural information. The scoring function has been web enabled at www.scfbio-iitd.res.in/utility/proteomics/energy.jsp     

The use of soluble protein structures in modeling helical proteins in a layered membrane

Major advances have been made in the prediction of soluble protein structures, led by the knowledge-based modeling methods that extract useful structural trends from known protein structures and incorporate them into scoring functions. The same cannot be reported for the class of transmembrane proteins, primarily due to the lack of high-resolution structural data for transmembrane proteins, which render many of the knowledge-based method unreliable or invalid. We have developed a method that harnesses the vast structural knowledge available in soluble protein data for use in the modeling of transmembrane proteins. At the core of the method, a set of transmembrane protein decoy sets that allow us to filter and train features recognized from soluble proteins for transmembrane protein modeling into a set of scoring functions. We have demonstrated that structures of soluble proteins can provide significant insight into transmembrane protein structures. A complementary novel two-stage modeling/selection process that mimics the two-stage helical membrane protein folding was developed. Combined with the scoring function, the method was successfully applied to model 5 transmembrane proteins. The root mean square deviations of the predicted models ranged from 5.0 to 8.8?Å to the native structures.     

Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model

Protein decoy data sets provide a benchmark for testing scoring functions designed for fold recognition and protein homology modeling problems. It is commonly believed that statistical potentials based on reduced atomic models are better able to discriminate native-like from misfolded decoys than scoring functions based on more detailed molecular mechanics models. Recent benchmark tests on small data sets, however, suggest otherwise. In this work, we report the results of extensive decoy detection tests using an effective free energy function based on the OPLS all-atom (OPLS-AA) force field and the Surface Generalized Born (SGB) model for the solvent electrostatic effects. The OPLS-AA/SGB effective free energy is used as a scoring function to detect native protein folds among a total of 48,832 decoys for 32 different proteins from Park and Levitt's 4-state-reduced, Levitt's local-minima, Baker's ROSETTA all-atom, and Skolnick's decoy sets. Solvent electrostatic effects are included through the Surface Generalized Born (SGB) model. All structures are locally minimized without restraints. From an analysis of the individual energy components of the OPLS-AA/SGB energy function for the native and the best-ranked decoy, it is determined that a balance of the terms of the potential is responsible for the minimized energies that most successfully distinguish the native from the misfolded conformations. Different combinations of individual energy terms provide less discrimination than the total energy. The results are consistent with observations that all-atom molecular potentials coupled with intermediate level solvent dielectric models are competitive with knowledge-based potentials for decoy detection and protein modeling problems such as fold recognition and homology modeling.     

How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?

One strategy for ab initio protein structure prediction is to generate a large number of possible structures (decoys) and select the most fitting ones based on a scoring or free energy function. The conformational space of a protein is huge, and chances are rare that any heuristically generated structure will directly fall in the neighborhood of the native structure. It is desirable that, instead of being thrown away, the unfitting decoy structures can provide insights into native structures so prediction can be made progressively. First, we demonstrate that a recently parameterized physics-based effective free energy function based on the GROMOS96 force field and a generalized Born/surface area solvent model is, as several other physics-based and knowledge-based models, capable of distinguishing native structures from decoy structures for a number of widely used decoy databases. Second, we observe a substantial increase in correlations of the effective free energies with the degree of similarity between the decoys and the native structure, if the similarity is measured by the content of native inter-residue contacts in a decoy structure rather than its root-mean-square deviation from the native structure. Finally, we investigate the possibility of predicting native contacts based on the frequency of occurrence of contacts in decoy structures. For most proteins contained in the decoy databases, a meaningful amount of native contacts can be predicted based on plain frequencies of occurrence at a relatively high level of accuracy. Relative to using plain frequencies, overwhelming improvements in sensitivity of the predictions are observed for the 4_state_reduced decoy sets by applying energy-dependent weighting of decoy structures in determining the frequency. There, approximately 80% native contacts can be predicted at an accuracy of approximately 80% using energy-weighted frequencies. The sensitivity of the plain frequency approach is much lower (20% to 40%). Such improvements are, however, not observed for the other decoy databases. The rationalization and implications of the results are discussed.     

Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design

Motivation. Protein design aims to identify sequences compatible with a given protein fold but incompatible to any alternative folds. To select the correct sequences and to guide the search process, a design scoring function is critically important. Such a scoring function should be able to characterize the global fitness landscape of many proteins simultaneously. RESULTS: To find optimal design scoring functions, we introduce two geometric views and propose a formulation using a mixture of non-linear Gaussian kernel functions. We aim to solve a simplified protein sequence design problem. Our goal is to distinguish each native sequence for a major portion of representative protein structures from a large number of alternative decoy sequences, each a fragment from proteins of different folds. Our scoring function discriminates perfectly a set of 440 native proteins from 14 million sequence decoys. We show that no linear scoring function can succeed in this task. In a blind test of unrelated proteins, our scoring function misclassfies only 13 native proteins out of 194. This compares favorably with about three-four times more misclassifications when optimal linear functions reported in the literature are used. We also discuss how to develop protein folding scoring function.