Translational control by influenza virus: suppression of the kinase that phosphorylates the alpha subunit of initiation factor eIF-2 and selective translation of influenza viral mRNAs.

Selective translation of influenza viral mRNAs occurs after influenza virus superinfection of cells infected with the VAI RNA-negative adenovirus mutant dl331 (M. G. Katze, Y.-T. Chen, and R. M. Krug, Cell 37:483-490, 1984). Cell extracts from these doubly infected cells catalyze the initiation of essentially only influenza viral protein synthesis, reproducing the in vivo situation. This selective translation is correlated with a 5- to 10-fold suppression of the dl331-induced kinase that phosphorylates the alpha subunit of eucaryotic initiation factor eIF-2. This strongly suggests that influenza virus encodes a gene product that, analogous to the adenoviral VAI RNA, prevents the shutdown of overall protein synthesis caused by an eIF-2 alpha kinase turned on by viral infection. Adenoviral mRNA translation was restored to the extract from the doubly infected cells by the addition of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF-2B, which is responsible for the normal recycling of eIF-2 during protein synthesis. This indicates that the residual kinase in the doubly infected cells leads to a limitation in functional (nonsequestered) eIF-2B and hence functional (GTP-containing) eIF-2 and that under these conditions influenza viral mRNAs are selectively translated over adenoviral mRNAs. Addition of double-stranded RNA to the extracts from these cells restored the eIF-2 alpha kinase to a level approaching that seen in extracts from cells infected with dl331 alone and caused the inhibition of influenza viral mRNA translation. This suggests that the putative influenza viral gene product acts against the double-stranded RNA activation of the kinase and indicates that influenza viral mRNA translation is also linked to the level of functional eIF-2. Our results thus indicate that a limitation in functional eIF-2 which causes a nonspecific reduction in the rate of initiation of protein synthesis results in the preferential translation of the better mRNAs (influenza viral mRNAs) at the expense of the poorer mRNAs (adenoviral mRNAs).     

Cellular mRNA translation is blocked at both initiation and elongation after infection by influenza virus or adenovirus.

During influenza virus infection, protein synthesis is maintained at high levels and a dramatic switch from cellular to viral protein synthesis occurs despite the presence of high levels of functional cellular mRNAs in the cytoplasm of infected cells (M. G. Katze and R. M. Krug, Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:2198-2206, 1984). To determine the step at which the block in cellular mRNA translation occurs, we compared the polysome association of several representative cellular mRNAs (actin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and pHe7 mRNAs) in infected and uninfected HeLa cells. We showed that most of these cellular mRNAs remained polysome associated after influenza viral infection, indicating that the elongation of the proteins encoded by these cellular mRNAs was severely inhibited. Because the polysomes containing these cellular mRNAs did not increase in size but either remained the same size or decreased in size, the initiation step in cellular protein synthesis must also have been defective. Several control experiments established that the cellular mRNAs sedimenting in the polysome region of sucrose gradients were in fact associated with polyribosomes. Most definitively, puromycin treatment of infected cells caused the dissociation of polysomes and the release of cellular, as well as viral, mRNAs from the polysomes, indicating that the cellular mRNAs were associated with polysomes that were capable of forming at least a single peptide bond. A similar analysis was performed with HeLa cells infected by adenovirus, which also dramatically shuts down cellular protein synthesis. Again, it was found that most of the cellular mRNAs, which were translatable in reticulocyte extracts, remained associated with polysomes and that there was a combined initiation-elongation block to cellular protein synthesis. In cells infected by both adenovirus and influenza virus, influenza viral mRNAs were on larger polysomes than were several late adenoviral mRNAs with comparably sized coding regions. In addition, after influenza virus superinfection of cells infected by the adenovirus mutant dl331, a situation in which there is a limitation in the amount of functional initiation factor eIF-2 (M. G. Katze, B. M. Detjen, B. Safer, and R. M. Krug, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:1741-1750, 1986), influenza viral mRNAs, but not late adenoviral mRNAs, were on polysomes. These results indicate that influenza viral mRNAs are better initiators of translation than are late adenoviral mRNAs.     

Effect of high salt treatment on influenza B viral protein synthesis in MDCK cells

Based on the information that high salt inhibits the initiation of cellular mRNA translation which depends on the function of the 5'-terminal structure of mRNA, we compared the effect of high salt on translation of host cellular mRNAs and influenza viral mRNAs, both of which are of 5'-terminal structure. Brief exposure of influenza B virus-infected MDCK cells to high salt medium resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of viral polypeptide synthesis as well as of cellular polypeptide synthesis, but it had less effect on synthesis of viral polypeptides, particularly nonstructural protein (NS). Under these conditions the Na+ content of the infected cells was significantly increased. A similar salt effect on in vitro translation of viral and cellular mRNAs extracted from infected cells was also observed. There was no significant difference in sensitivity to hypertonic block of in vivo translation of influenza viral mRNAs and vesicular stomatitis virus mRNAs, the latter of which possess a virus-directed structure at the 5'-terminus.     

Influenza Virus mRNA Translation Revisited: Is the eIF4E Cap-Binding Factor Required for Viral mRNA Translation?

Influenza virus mRNAs bear a short capped oligonucleotide sequence at their 5' ends derived from the host cell pre-mRNAs by a "cap-snatching" mechanism, followed immediately by a common viral sequence. At their 3' ends, they contain a poly(A) tail. Although cellular and viral mRNAs are structurally similar, influenza virus promotes the selective translation of its mRNAs despite the inhibition of host cell protein synthesis. The viral polymerase performs the cap snatching and binds selectively to the 5' common viral sequence. As viral mRNAs are recognized by their own cap-binding complex, we tested whether viral mRNA translation occurs without the contribution of the eIF4E protein, the cellular factor required for cap-dependent translation. Here, we show that influenza virus infection proceeds normally in different situations of functional impairment of the eIF4E factor. In addition, influenza virus polymerase binds to translation preinitiation complexes, and furthermore, under conditions of decreased eIF4GI association to cap structures, an increase in eIF4GI binding to these structures was found upon influenza virus infection. This is the first report providing evidence that influenza virus mRNA translation proceeds independently of a fully active translation initiation factor (eIF4E). The data reported are in agreement with a role of viral polymerase as a substitute for the eIF4E factor for viral mRNA translation.     

Encephalomyocarditis Virus Infection of Mouse Plasmacytoma Cells I. Inhibition of Cellular Protein Synthesis

Mouse plasmacytoma ascites tumor cells (MOPC 460) were efficiently infected with encephalomyocarditis virus. Inhibition of host protein synthesis was evident after 2 h and complete by 4 h postinfection. The mechanism by which virus infection results in inhibition of host cell protein synthesis was studied in vitro. Cell-free protein-synthesizing systems, prepared from uninfected and infected cells, were found to be equally active with respect to their abilities to translate cellular and viral mRNAs. The plasmacytoma cell-free system was also shown to be insensitive to the addition of double-stranded viral RNA. Host cellular mRNA was isolated from uninfected and infected cells. No difference in the amount or size distribution of the mRNA was detected. However, the mRNA from infected cells was translated only 46 to 49% as actively as that from uninfected cells. mRNA isolated from cells in which initiation of protein synthesis was inhibited with pactamycin was similarly inactivated. Simultaneous addition of viral RNA and cellular mRNA to the plasmacytoma cell-free system resulted in a complete suppression of the translation of the cellular message, whereas viral RNA was translated normally.     

Effects of Influenza A Virus NS1 Protein on Protein Expression: the NS1 Protein Enhances Translation and Is Not Required for Shutoff of Host Protein Synthesis

The influenza A virus NS1 protein, a virus-encoded alpha/beta interferon (IFN-alpha/beta) antagonist, appears to be a key regulator of protein expression in infected cells. We now show that NS1 protein expression results in enhancement of reporter gene activity from transfected plasmids. This effect appears to be mediated at the translational level, and it is reminiscent of the activity of the adenoviral virus-associated I (VAI) RNA, a known inhibitor of the antiviral, IFN-induced, PKR protein. To study the effects of the NS1 protein on viral and cellular protein synthesis during influenza A virus infection, we used recombinant influenza viruses lacking the NS1 gene (delNS1) or expressing truncated NS1 proteins. Our results demonstrate that the NS1 protein is required for efficient viral protein synthesis in COS-7 cells. This activity maps to the amino-terminal domain of the NS1 protein, since cells infected with wild-type virus or with a mutant virus expressing a truncated NS1 protein-lacking approximately half of its carboxy-terminal end-showed similar kinetics of viral and cellular protein expression. Interestingly, no major differences in host cell protein synthesis shutoff or in viral protein expression were found among NS1 mutant viruses in Vero cells. Thus, another viral component(s) different from the NS1 protein is responsible for the inhibition of host protein synthesis during viral infection. In contrast to the earlier proposal suggesting that the NS1 protein regulates the levels of spliced M2 mRNA, no effects on M2 protein accumulation were seen in Vero cells infected with delNS1 virus.     

5' sequence of vesicular stomatitis virus N-gene confers selective translation of mRNA.

The infection of cells by vesicular stomatitis virus results in the rapid inhibition of host-cell protein synthesis, but not of viral protein synthesis. To determine if this translational selectivity might be conferred by the viral mRNA, we constructed a plasmid (pUCLN beta-4) containing the 5' end of the viral nucleocapsid (N)-gene, including the ribosome binding site, fused in frame with the gene encoding beta-galactosidase, and compared it to a control plasmid (pMC1924) containing the cellular rabbit beta-globin gene 5' end fused with the beta-galactosidase encoding gene. Both plasmids contained identical promoter and 3' nontranslated regions and expressed similar levels of beta-galactosidase in the indicator cell line 293. In cells transfected with either plasmid, viral infection resulted in a approximately 70% decrease in protein synthesis by five hours. The level of beta-galactosidase from cells transfected with pMC1924 also decreased concomitantly with the decrease in total protein synthesis. However, the level of beta-galactosidase from cells transfected with pUCLN beta-4 was not affected by viral infection. Our data suggest that sequences in the 5' end of the viral mRNA allow for the selective translation of the viral message in the presence of an inhibited translational machinery.     

Translational control of protein synthesis after infection by vesicular stomatitis virus.

Four hours after infection of BHK cells by vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), the rate of total protein synthesis was about 65% that of uninfected cells and synthesis of the 12 to 15 predominant cellular polypeptides was reduced to a level about 25% that of control cells. As determined by in vitro translation of isolated RNA and both one- and two-dimensional gel analyses of the products, all predominant cellular mRNA's remained intact and translatable after infection. The total amount of translatable mRNA per cell increased about threefold after infection; this additional mRNA directed synthesis of the five VSV structural proteins. To determine the subcellular localization of cellular and viral mRNA before and after infection, RNA from various sizes of polysomes and nonpolysomal ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) was isolated from infected and noninfected cells and translated in vitro. Over 80% of most predominant species of cellular mRNA was bound to polysomes in control cells, and over 60% was bound in infected cells. Only 2 of the 12 predominant species of translatable cellular mRNA's were localized to the RNP fraction, both in infected and in uninfected cells. The average size of polysomes translating individual cellular mRNA's was reduced about two- to threefold after infection. For example, in uninfected cells, actin (molecular weight 42,000) mRNA was found predominantly on polysomes with 12 ribosomes; after infection it was found on polysomes with five ribosomes, the same size of polysomes that were translating VSV N (molecular weight 52,000) and M (molecular weight 35,000) mRNA. We conclude that the inhibition of cellular protein synthesis after VSV infection is due, in large measure, to competition for ribosomes by a large excess of viral mRNA. The efficiency of initiation of translation on cellular and viral mRNA's is about the same in infected cells; cellular ribosomes are simply distributed among more mRNA's than are present in growing cells. About 20 to 30% of each of the predominant cellular and viral mRNA's were present in RNP particles in infected cells and were presumably inactive in protein synthesis. There was no preferential sequestration of cellular or viral mRNA's in RNPs after infection.     

What Happens Inside Lentivirus or Influenza Virus Infected Cells: Insights into Regulation of Cellular and Viral Protein Synthesis

Efficient manipulation of the regulatory mechanisms controlling host cell gene expression provides the means for productive infection by animal viruses. Upon infecting the host cell, viruses must: (i) bypass the cellular antiviral defense mechanisms to prevent the translational blocks imposed by the interferon pathway; and (ii) effectively “hijack” the host protein synthetic machinery into mass production of virion protein components. The multicomponent regulatory nature of cellular gene expression has provided the means of selecting for a diverse range of mechanisms utilized by animal viruses to ensure that replication efficiency is maintained throughout the virus life cycle. One important research component of the careful examination of gene regulation is those studies that focus on elucidating the mechanisms by which viruses control mRNA translation during host cell infection. Much of the work in our laboratory has focused on elucidating the strategies by which human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and influenza virus regulate protein synthesis during infection. Here we describe the ways in which these two distinctly different RNA viruses ensure the selective and efficient translation of their viral mRNAs in infected cells. These strategies include circumvention of the deleterious effects associated with activation of the interferon-induced protein kinase, PKR. Herein we describe our methodologies designed to elucidate the translational regulation in cells infected by these viruses. We conclude with a brief summary of new directions, utilizing these methods, taken toward understanding the translational control mechanisms imposed by these viral systems, and how our studies of virally infected cells have allowed us to identify growth-regulating components of normal, uninfected cells.     

Modification of eukaryotic initiation factor 4F during infection by influenza virus.

Influenza virus infection of cells is accompanied by a striking shutoff of cellular protein synthesis, resulting in the exclusive translation of viral mRNAs. The mechanism for control of cellular protein synthesis by influenza virus is poorly understood, but several translation properties of influenza virus mRNAs which are potentially involved have been described. Influenza virus mRNAs possess the surprising ability to translate in the presence of inhibitory levels of inactive (phosphorylated) eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF-2). In addition, influenza virus mRNAs were shown to be capable of translating in cells during the late phase of adenovirus infection but not in cells infected by poliovirus. Since both adenovirus and poliovirus facilitate virus-specific translation by impairing the activity of initiation factor eIF-4F (cap-binding protein complex) but through different mechanisms, we investigated the translation properties of influenza virus mRNAs in more detail. We show that influenza virus infection is associated with the significant dephosphorylation and inactivation of eIF-4E (cap-binding protein), a component of eIF-4F, and accordingly that influenza virus mRNAs possess a moderate ability to translate by using low levels of eIF-4F. We also confirm the ability of influenza virus mRNAs to translate in the presence of high levels of inactive (phosphorylated) eIF-2 but to a more limited extent than reported previously. We suggest a potential mechanism for the regulation of protein synthesis by influenza virus involving a decreased requirement for large pools of active eIF-4F and eIF-2.     

Reversion by hypotonic medium of the shutoff of protein synthesis induced by encephalomyocarditis virus.

Infection of human HeLa cells by picornaviruses produces a drastic inhibition of host protein synthesis. Treatment of encephalomyocarditis virus-infected HeLa cells with hypotonic medium reversed this inhibition; no viral protein synthesis was detected. The blockade of viral translation by hypotonic conditions was observed for a wide range of multiplicities of infection. However, only with low virus-to-cell ratios did cellular protein synthesis resume. The ratio of cellular to viral mRNA translation was strongly influenced by the concentration of monovalent ions present in the culture medium: a high concentration of NaCl or KCl favored the translation of viral mRNA and strongly inhibited cellular protein synthesis, whereas the opposite was true when NaCl was omitted from the culture medium. Once viral protein synthesis had been blocked by hypotonic medium treatment, it resumed when the infected cells were placed in a normal or hypertonic medium, indicating that the viral components synthesized in the infected cells were not destroyed by this treatment. These observations reinforced the idea that ions play a role in discriminating between viral and cellular mRNA translation in virus-infected animal cells.     

Bluetongue virus non-structural protein 1 is a positive regulator of viral protein synthesis

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Bluetongue virus (BTV) is a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus of the Reoviridae family, which encodes its genes in ten linear dsRNA segments. BTV mRNAs are synthesised by the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) as exact plus sense copies of the genome segments. Infection of mammalian cells with BTV rapidly replaces cellular protein synthesis with viral protein synthesis, but the regulation of viral gene expression in the Orbivirus genus has not been investigated. RESULTS: Using an mRNA reporter system based on genome segment 10 of BTV fused with GFP we identify the protein characteristic of this genus, non-structural protein 1 (NS1) as sufficient to upregulate translation. The wider applicability of this phenomenon among the viral genes is demonstrated using the untranslated regions (UTRs) of BTV genome segments flanking the quantifiable Renilla luciferase ORF in chimeric mRNAs. The UTRs of viral mRNAs are shown to be determinants of the amount of protein synthesised, with the pre-expression of NS1 increasing the quantity in each case. The increased expression induced by pre-expression of NS1 is confirmed in virus infected cells by generating a replicating virus which expresses the reporter fused with genome segment 10, using reverse genetics. Moreover, NS1-mediated upregulation of expression is restricted to mRNAs which lack the cellular 3[PRIME] poly(A) sequence identifying the 3[PRIME] end as a necessary determinant in specifically increasing the translation of viral mRNA in the presence of cellular mRNA. CONCLUSIONS: NS1 is identified as a positive regulator of viral protein synthesis. We propose a model of translational regulation where NS1 upregulates the synthesis of viral proteins, including itself, and creates a positive feedback loop of NS1 expression, which rapidly increases the expression of all the viral proteins. The efficient translation of viral reporter mRNAs among cellular mRNAs can account for the observed replacement of cellular protein synthesis with viral protein synthesis during infection.     

The cellular protein P58IPK regulates influenza virus mRNA translation and replication through a PKR-mediated mechanism

We previously hypothesized that efficient translation of influenza virus mRNA requires the recruitment of P58(IPK), the cellular inhibitor of PKR, an interferon-induced kinase that targets the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF2alpha. P58(IPK) also inhibits PERK, an eIF2alpha kinase that is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and induced during ER stress. The ability of P58(IPK) to interact with and inhibit multiple eIF2alpha kinases suggests it is a critical regulator of both cellular and viral mRNA translation. In this study, we sought to definitively define the role of P58(IPK) during viral infection of mammalian cells. Using mouse embryo fibroblasts from P58(IPK-/-) mice, we demonstrated that the absence of P58(IPK) led to an increase in eIF2alpha phosphorylation and decreased influenza virus mRNA translation. The absence of P58(IPK) also resulted in decreased vesicular stomatitis virus replication but enhanced reovirus yields. In cells lacking the P58(IPK) target, PKR, the trends were reversed-eIF2alpha phosphorylation was decreased, and influenza virus mRNA translation was increased. Although P58(IPK) also inhibits PERK, the presence or absence of this kinase had little effect on influenza virus mRNA translation, despite reduced levels of eIF2alpha phosphorylation in cells lacking PERK. Finally, we showed that influenza virus protein synthesis and viral mRNA levels decrease in cells that express a constitutively active, nonphosphorylatable eIF2alpha. Taken together, our results support a model in which P58(IPK) regulates influenza virus mRNA translation and infection through a PKR-mediated mechanism which is independent of PERK.     

Cellular protein synthesis shutoff by mengovirus: translation of nonviral and viral mRNA''s in extracts from uninfected and infected Ehrlich ascites tumor cells.

The mechanism whereby picornaviruses inhibit host protein synthesis while their own synthetic processes proceed unabated has remained elusive. One of our approaches to this problem was to study the ability of cell-free extracts derived from uninfected and mengovirus-infected Ehrlich ascites tumor cells to translate viral and nonviral mRNA's under various conditions of incubation. Our results indicate that viral messengers (from mengovirus and encephalomyocarditis virus) and cellular messengers [L cell and Ehrlich ascites tumor poly(A)-containing mRNA's, rabbit globin mRNA, and chicken embryo lens crystallin mRNA] are translated equally well in both extracts. We also examined the simultaneous translation of viral and nonviral mRNA's in extracts from uninfected Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Our results indicate that under certain conditions mengovirus RNA can suppress completely the translation of globin mRNA. The significance of these results in terms of the shutoff of host protein synthesis is discussed.     

Replication of nodamura virus after transfection of viral RNA into mammalian cells in culture.

Nodamura virus (NOV) was purified from the hind limbs of infected suckling mice and used as a source of the two genomic RNAs of the virus, RNA 1 and RNA 2. Upon transfection of the viral RNAs into baby hamster kidney (BHK21) cells in culture, vigorous RNA replication ensued and single-stranded RNAs 1 and 2 accumulated to reach an abundance which approximated that of the cellular rRNAs. Transient synthesis of a small subgenomic RNA (RNA 3) was also observed, and double-stranded versions of RNAs 1, 2, and 3 were detected. Three major viral proteins were synthesized in transfected cells. Protein A (about 115 kDa) and protein B (about 15 kDa) were made transiently at early times after transfection, whereas a large amount of protein alpha (43 kDa), the precursor to the two viral coat proteins, was made continuously starting later in the infectious cycle. When very low concentrations of viral RNAs were used for transfection, preferential replication of RNA 1 occurred. This result was attributed to segregation of the transfected viral RNAs to separate cells in culture and the subsequent replication and amplification of RNA 1 in cells that had received no RNA 2. Accordingly, multiple passages of the viral RNAs by transfection at the limit dilution resulted in the purification of RNA 1 free of RNA 2 and demonstrated that RNA 1 was capable of prolonged autonomous replication which was also accompanied by the continuous synthesis of RNA 3. In cells transfected with RNA 1 alone, protein alpha was not synthesized and proteins A and B were made continuously. Electron microscopic analysis of BHK21 cells 24 h after transfection with NOV RNAs 1 and 2 showed that large numbers of virus particles accumulated in the cytoplasm and formed paracrystalline arrays in some regions. Whole NOV purified from transfected BHK21 cells was infectious for suckling mice and had an electrophoretic mobility that was similar but not identical to that of NOV purified from infected mouse muscle. The high yield of NOV, its simple genetic composition, and its unusual genome strategy make this virus an attractive system for the study of viral RNA replication in animal cells.