Perisaccadic mislocalization orthogonal to saccade direction

Saccadic eye movements transiently distort perceptual space. Visual objects flashed shortly before or during a saccade are mislocalized along the saccade direction, resembling a compression of space around the saccade target. These mislocalizations reflect transient errors of processes that construct spatial stability across eye movements. They may arise from errors of reference signals associated with saccade direction and amplitude or from visual or visuomotor remapping processes focused on the saccade target's position. The second case would predict apparent position shifts toward the target also in directions orthogonal to the saccade. We report that such orthogonal mislocalization indeed occurs. Surprisingly, however, the orthogonal mislocalization is restricted to only part of the visual field. This part comprises distant positions in saccade direction but does not depend on the target's position. Our findings can be explained by a combination of directional and positional reference signals that varies in time course across the visual field.     

Causal Inference for Spatial Constancy across Saccades

Our ability to interact with the environment hinges on creating a stable visual world despite the continuous changes in retinal input. To achieve visual stability, the brain must distinguish the retinal image shifts caused by eye movements and shifts due to movements of the visual scene. This process appears not to be flawless: during saccades, we often fail to detect whether visual objects remain stable or move, which is called saccadic suppression of displacement (SSD). How does the brain evaluate the memorized information of the presaccadic scene and the actual visual feedback of the postsaccadic visual scene in the computations for visual stability? Using a SSD task, we test how participants localize the presaccadic position of the fixation target, the saccade target or a peripheral non-foveated target that was displaced parallel or orthogonal during a horizontal saccade, and subsequently viewed for three different durations. Results showed different localization errors of the three targets, depending on the viewing time of the postsaccadic stimulus and its spatial separation from the presaccadic location. We modeled the data through a Bayesian causal inference mechanism, in which at the trial level an optimal mixing of two possible strategies, integration vs. separation of the presaccadic memory and the postsaccadic sensory signals, is applied. Fits of this model generally outperformed other plausible decision strategies for producing SSD. Our findings suggest that humans exploit a Bayesian inference process with two causal structures to mediate visual stability.     

Is Mislocalization during Saccades Related to the Position of the Saccade Target within the Image or to the Gaze Position at the End of the Saccade?

A stimulus that is flashed around the time of a saccade tends to be mislocalized in the direction of the saccade target. Our question is whether the mislocalization is related to the position of the saccade target within the image or to the gaze position at the end of the saccade. We separated the two with a visual illusion that influences the perceived distance to the target of the saccade and thus saccade endpoint without affecting the perceived position of the saccade target within the image. We asked participants to make horizontal saccades from the left to the right end of the shaft of a Müller-Lyer figure. Around the time of the saccade, we flashed a bar at one of five possible positions and asked participants to indicate its location by touching the screen. As expected, participants made shorter saccades along the fins-in (<–>) configuration than along the fins-out (>–<) configuration of the figure. The illusion also influenced the mislocalization pattern during saccades, with flashes presented with the fins-out configuration being perceived beyond flashes presented with the fins-in configuration. The difference between the patterns of mislocalization for bars flashed during the saccade for the two configurations corresponded quantitatively with a prediction based on compression towards the saccade endpoint considering the magnitude of the effect of the illusion on saccade amplitude. We conclude that mislocalization is related to the eye position at the end of the saccade, rather than to the position of the saccade target within the image.     

Two distinct visual motion mechanisms for smooth pursuit: evidence from individual differences

Smooth-pursuit eye velocity to a moving target is more accurate after an initial catch-up saccade than before, an enhancement that is poorly understood. We present an individual-differences-based method for identifying mechanisms underlying a physiological response and use it to test whether visual motion signals driving pursuit differ pre- and postsaccade. Correlating moment-to-moment measurements of pursuit over time with two psychophysical measures of speed estimation during fixation, we find two independent associations across individuals. Presaccadic pursuit acceleration is predicted by the precision of low-level (motion-energy-based) speed estimation, and postsaccadic pursuit precision is predicted by the precision of high-level (position-tracking) speed estimation. These results provide evidence that a low-level motion signal influences presaccadic acceleration and an independent high-level motion signal influences postsaccadic precision, thus presenting a plausible mechanism for postsaccadic enhancement of pursuit.     

The Role of Temporal Information in Perisaccadic Mislocalization

In dynamic environments, it is crucial to accurately consider the timing of information. For instance, during saccades the eyes rotate so fast that even small temporal errors in relating retinal stimulation by flashed stimuli to extra-retinal information about the eyes’ orientations will give rise to substantial errors in where the stimuli are judged to be. If spatial localization involves judging the eyes’ orientations at the estimated time of the flash, we should be able to manipulate the pattern of mislocalization by altering the estimated time of the flash. We reasoned that if we presented a relevant flash within a short rapid sequence of irrelevant flashes, participants’ estimates of when the relevant flash was presented might be shifted towards the centre of the sequence. In a first experiment, we presented five bars at different positions around the time of a saccade. Four of the bars were black. Either the second or the fourth bar in the sequence was red. The task was to localize the red bar. We found that when the red bar was presented second in the sequence, it was judged to be further in the direction of the saccade than when it was presented fourth in the sequence. Could this be because the red bar was processed faster when more black bars preceded it? In a second experiment, a red bar was either presented alone or followed by two black bars. When two black bars followed it, it was judged to be further in the direction of the saccade. We conclude that the spatial localization of flashed stimuli involves judging the eye orientation at the estimated time of the flash.     

The peri-saccadic perception of objects and space

Eye movements affect object localization and object recognition. Around saccade onset, briefly flashed stimuli appear compressed towards the saccade target, receptive fields dynamically change position, and the recognition of objects near the saccade target is improved. These effects have been attributed to different mechanisms. We provide a unifying account of peri-saccadic perception explaining all three phenomena by a quantitative computational approach simulating cortical cell responses on the population level. Contrary to the common view of spatial attention as a spotlight, our model suggests that oculomotor feedback alters the receptive field structure in multiple visual areas at an intermediate level of the cortical hierarchy to dynamically recruit cells for processing a relevant part of the visual field. The compression of visual space occurs at the expense of this locally enhanced processing capacity.     

Computational models of spatial updating in peri-saccadic perception

Perceptual phenomena that occur around the time of a saccade, such as peri-saccadic mislocalization or saccadic suppression of displacement, have often been linked to mechanisms of spatial stability. These phenomena are usually regarded as errors in processes of trans-saccadic spatial transformations and they provide important tools to study these processes. However, a true understanding of the underlying brain processes that participate in the preparation for a saccade and in the transfer of information across it requires a closer, more quantitative approach that links different perceptual phenomena with each other and with the functional requirements of ensuring spatial stability. We review a number of computational models of peri-saccadic spatial perception that provide steps in that direction. Although most models are concerned with only specific phenomena, some generalization and interconnection between them can be obtained from a comparison. Our analysis shows how different perceptual effects can coherently be brought together and linked back to neuronal mechanisms on the way to explaining vision across saccades.     

Coordinates of Human Visual and Inertial Heading Perception

Heading estimation involves both inertial and visual cues. Inertial motion is sensed by the labyrinth, somatic sensation by the body, and optic flow by the retina. Because the eye and head are mobile these stimuli are sensed relative to different reference frames and it remains unclear if a perception occurs in a common reference frame. Recent neurophysiologic evidence has suggested the reference frames remain separate even at higher levels of processing but has not addressed the resulting perception. Seven human subjects experienced a 2s, 16 cm/s translation and/or a visual stimulus corresponding with this translation. For each condition 72 stimuli (360° in 5° increments) were delivered in random order. After each stimulus the subject identified the perceived heading using a mechanical dial. Some trial blocks included interleaved conditions in which the influence of ±28° of gaze and/or head position were examined. The observations were fit using a two degree-of-freedom population vector decoder (PVD) model which considered the relative sensitivity to lateral motion and coordinate system offset. For visual stimuli gaze shifts caused shifts in perceived head estimates in the direction opposite the gaze shift in all subjects. These perceptual shifts averaged 13 ± 2° for eye only gaze shifts and 17 ± 2° for eye-head gaze shifts. This finding indicates visual headings are biased towards retina coordinates. Similar gaze and head direction shifts prior to inertial headings had no significant influence on heading direction. Thus inertial headings are perceived in body-centered coordinates. Combined visual and inertial stimuli yielded intermediate results.     

Spatiotopic visual maps revealed by saccadic adaptation in humans

Saccadic adaptation [1] is a powerful experimental paradigm to probe the mechanisms of eye movement control and spatial vision, in which saccadic amplitudes change in response to false visual feedback. The adaptation occurs primarily in the motor system [2, 3], but there is also evidence for visual adaptation, depending on the size and the permanence of the postsaccadic error [4-7]. Here we confirm that adaptation has a strong visual component and show that the visual component of the adaptation is spatially selective in external, not retinal coordinates. Subjects performed?a memory-guided, double-saccade, outward-adaptation task designed to maximize visual adaptation and to dissociate the visual and motor corrections. When the memorized saccadic target was in the same position (in external space) as that used in the adaptation training, saccade targeting was strongly influenced by adaptation (even if not matched in retinal or cranial position), but when in the same retinal or cranial but different external spatial position, targeting was unaffected by adaptation, demonstrating unequivocal spatiotopic selectivity. These results point to the existence of a spatiotopic neural representation for eye movement control that adapts in response to saccade error signals.     

Distortion of apparent shape of an object immediately before saccade

'Perisaccadic mislocalization' is an illusion in which a stimulus presented briefly near the time of saccade onset is mislocalized. The amount of mislocalization depends on the stimulus location and the stimulus onset time relative to saccade onset. It is unclear whether perisaccadic mislocalization distorts the shape perception of a single object. To investigate this problem, we asked participants to report whether the apparent shape of a triangle presented for 10 ms before saccade was slanted in the same direction or the opposite direction as the saccade. The results showed that the apparent shape of the triangle was distorted in the direction opposite to the saccade. We compared this apparent distortion with the mislocalization of a perisaccadic vertical bar, and found that the time-course and direction of the distortion were similar, although the amount of distortion was smaller for the triangle. A hypothetical explanation for these results based on the forward/inverse optics model was discussed.     

The influence of eye dominance on saccade characteristics and slow presaccadic potentials

Characteristics of saccades and presaccadic slow potentials were studied in 36 right-handed men with right (the RE group) and left (the LE group) eye dominance. Three light-emitting diodes located in the center of the visual field (the central fixation stimulus, CFS) and 10 deg to the left and to the right of the center (peripheral stimuli, PSs) were used for stimulation. The subjects performed a task with simple saccades to a PS and a task with antisaccades to the horizontal mirror position of the PS. Monopolar EEGs at 19 derivations and electrooculograms (EOGs) were recorded. Back averaging of the EEG time-locked to the PS onset or the saccade onset was used to obtain slow presaccadic potentials. The saccade characteristics in the RE and LE groups were similar. Differences between them were found only in the antisaccade task. The amplitude of negative presaccadic potentials (NPPs) time-locked to the PS in the frontal cortex was lower in the LE group compared to the RE group. Analysis of potentials time-locked to the saccade onset showed that changes in the slow potentials during the last 50 s before the saccade depended on the saccade direction and reflected the activation of the hemisphere opposite to the saccade direction. The activation of the right hemisphere before left-side saccades was higher in the LE than the RE group. In addition, the amplitude of NPPs was decreased in the frontal area and increased in the left posterior temporal area in the LE group compared to the RE group. The obtained results indicate that the involvement of the frontal cortex in cognitive and motor processes is decreased in subjects with the left eye dominance.     

Cortical positive potentials in the period of eye fixation prior to saccades and antisaccades

The EEG of 10 right-handed healthy subjects preceding saccade and antisaccade with mean values of latency in the eye fixations period were selected and averaged. The positive potential P2 appearing on the fixation stimuly switching on and slow positive wave following after it were more prominent before antisaccades than normal saccades. Space-temporal analyses of presaccadic potentials showed that right frontal cortex was activated more before antisaccades. These findings suggest that right cortical hemisphere dominate in spatial attention and inhibition of automatic saccades to visual stimuli in the period of antisaccades preparing. During the period of central fixations "intermediate" positivity potentials, developing in 600-400 ms prior to saccade or antisaccade onset, were find out. These potentials were predominantly recorded in the left frontal and frontosagittal cortical areas. The obtained evidence suggest that "intermediate" positive potentials a period related to the process of motor attention, anticipation and decision making in the period of eyes fixation.     

Predictive adjustment of the perceived direction of gaze during saccadic eye movements

When we look at a stationary object, the perceived direction of gaze (where we are looking) is aligned with the physical direction of eyes (where our eyes are oriented) by which the object is foveated. However, this alignment may not hold in a dynamic situation. Our experiments assessed the perceived locations of two brief stimuli (1 ms) simultaneously displayed at two different physical locations during a saccade. The first stimulus was in the instantaneous location to which the eyes were oriented and the second one was always in the same location as the initial fixation point. When the timing of these stimuli was changed intra-saccadically, their perceived locations were dissociated. The first stimuli were consistently perceived near the target that will be foveated at saccade termination. The second stimuli once perceived near the target location, shifted in the direction opposite to that of saccades, as its latency from saccades increased. These results suggested an independent adjustment of gaze orientation from the physical orientation of eyes during saccades. The spatial dissociation of two stimuli may reflect sensorimotor control of gaze during saccades.     

Positive potentials ot the human brain in the latent presaccadic period under conditions of stimulation of the leading and nonleading eye

We used backward averaging method to study fast positive presaccadic EEG-potentials under conditions of the monocular stimulation of the leading and nonleading eye. Two schemes of the visual stimulus presentation ("no gap" and "overlap") were used. In the "no gap" condition, potential P1 dominated in the hemispere ipsilateral to a saccade direction. In the "overlap" condition, when the gaze was fixed at the central point, foci of this potential were localized in the sagittal derivations or in the same sites as in the "no gap" conditions. Irrespective on the stimulation scheme, the P2 foci were localized in the hemisphere contralateral to a saccade direction. We assume that the fast positive potentials involve both activation and inhibition processes in visuomotor structures and can be also associated with cognitive presaccadic processes (such as fixation disengage, attention lateralization and a preliminary extraction of motor programs from memory).     

Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: a mere illusion of dissociation

A prominent and influential hypothesis of vision suggests the existence of two separate visual systems within the brain, one creating our perception of the world and another guiding our actions within it. The induced Roelofs effect has been described as providing strong evidence for this perception/action dissociation: When a small visual target is surrounded by a large frame positioned so that the frame's center is offset from the observer's midline, the perceived location of the target is shifted in the direction opposite the frame's offset. In spite of this perceptual mislocalization, however, the observer can accurately guide movements to the target location. Thus, perception is prone to the illusion while actions seem immune. Here we demonstrate that the Roelofs illusion is caused by a frame-induced transient distortion of the observer's apparent midline. We further demonstrate that actions guided to targets within this same distorted egocentric reference frame are fully expected to be accurate, since the errors of target localization will exactly cancel the errors of motor guidance. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for the various perceptual and motor effects of the induced Roelofs illusion without requiring the existence of separate neural systems for perception and action. Given this, the behavioral dissociation that accompanies the Roelofs effect cannot be considered evidence of a dissociation of perception and action. This indicates a general need to re-evaluate the broad class of evidence purported to support this hypothesized dissociation.     

In-vitro experimental assessment of a new robust algorithm for hip joint centre estimation

Hip joint centre (HJC) localization is used in several biomedical applications, such as movement analysis and computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery.The purpose of this study was to validate in vitro a new algorithm (MC-pivoting) for HJC computation and to compare its performances with the state-of-the-art (least square approach–LSA). The MC-pivoting algorithm iteratively searches for the 3D coordinates of the point belonging to the femoral bone that, during the circumduction of the femur around the hip joint (pivoting), runs the minimum length trajectory. The algorithm was initialized with a point distribution that can be considered close to a Monte Carlo simulation sampling all around the LSA estimate.The performances of the MC-pivoting algorithm, compared with LSA, were evaluated with tests on cadavers. Dynamic reference frames were applied on both the femur and the pelvis and were tracked by an optical localizer.Results proved the algorithm accuracy (1.7 mm±1.6, 2.3—median value±quartiles), reliability (smaller upper quartiles of the errors distribution with respect to LSA) and robustness (reduction of the errors also in case of large pelvis displacements).     

Use of uncalibrated biplanar radiography for the measurement of skeletal coordinates around the shoulder girdle

Mechanical modelling of the musculoskeletal system is dependent upon information regarding the bony attachments of the relevant muscles; in order to study the biomechanics of the shoulder girdle the authors have identified the muscle attachments in three embalmed cadavers. A simple biplanar radiographic technique was then used to determine the attachment coordinates using frames of reference defined for each bone. This technique, using hand positioning without special fixtures was believed to be sufficiently accurate, bearing in mind the likely degree of biological variation. In order to test this assumption, the accuracy of the technique has been studied by measuring the agreement between the two measurements of the common coordinate in the pairs of radiographs. it was found that for the trunk, the errors in the common coordinate were always less than the natural variation; for the scapula they were of a similar magnitude but, for the humerus, the measurement errors frequently exceeded the variation in the coordinates of muscle attachments. It was concluded that, in general, uncalibrated biplanar radiography was sufficiently accurate for the determination of the spatial coordinates of muscle attachments.     

The effect of the visual stimulation of the leading and nonleading eye on the value of the saccadic latency period and on the peak latency of rapid presaccadic potentials]

Visual targets were presented monocularly to the leading and nonleading eyes. The complex of rapid positive and negative potentials was studied using the reverse summation from the onset of saccades. The latencies of saccades and peak latencies of the averaged presaccadic potentials were measured. The dependence of the saccade latencies and peak latencies of the complex of potentials on stimulation of the leading or nonleading eye and saccade direction was not simple and was largely determined by the individual profile of asymmetry. It is suggested that during stimulation of the leading eye the processes of attention fixation and switching as well as of the space visual processing are faster than during stimulation of the nonleading eye. Thus, the leading role of the right eye is reflected not only in fixation processes but also in movement anticipation.     

Positive potentials of the human brain at different stages of preparation of a visually triggered saccade

The EEG of 10 right-handed subjects preceding saccades with mean values of latent periods were selected and averaged. Two standard paradigms of presentation of visual stimuli (central fixation stimulus-peripheral target succession): with a 200-ms inerstimulus interval (GAP) and successive single step (SS). During the period of central fixation, two kinds of positive potentials were observed: fast potentials of "inermediate" positivity (IP) developing 600-400 ms prior to saccade onset and fast potentials of "leading" positivity (LP), which immediately preceded the offset of the central fixation stimulus. Peak latency of the LP potentials was 300 ms prior to saccade onset in the SS paradigm and 400 ms in the GAP paradigm. These potentials were predominantly recorded in the frontal and frontosagittal cortical areas. Decrease in the latency by 30-50 ms in the GAP paradigm was associated with more pronounced positive potentials during the fixation period and absence of the initiation potential P-1' (or decrease in its amplitude). The obtained evidence suggest that the fast positive presaccadic potentials are of a complex nature related to attention, anticipation, motor preparation, decision making, saccadic initiation, and backward afferentation.     

Perisaccadic Remapping and Rescaling of Visual Responses in Macaque Superior Colliculus

Visual neurons have spatial receptive fields that encode the positions of objects relative to the fovea. Because foveate animals execute frequent saccadic eye movements, this position information is constantly changing, even though the visual world is generally stationary. Interestingly, visual receptive fields in many brain regions have been found to exhibit changes in strength, size, or position around the time of each saccade, and these changes have often been suggested to be involved in the maintenance of perceptual stability. Crucial to the circuitry underlying perisaccadic changes in visual receptive fields is the superior colliculus (SC), a brainstem structure responsible for integrating visual and oculomotor signals. In this work we have studied the time-course of receptive field changes in the SC. We find that the distribution of the latencies of SC responses to stimuli placed outside the fixation receptive field is bimodal: The first mode is comprised of early responses that are temporally locked to the onset of the visual probe stimulus and stronger for probes placed closer to the classical receptive field. We suggest that such responses are therefore consistent with a perisaccadic rescaling, or enhancement, of weak visual responses within a fixed spatial receptive field. The second mode is more similar to the remapping that has been reported in the cortex, as responses are time-locked to saccade onset and stronger for stimuli placed in the postsaccadic receptive field location. We suggest that these two temporal phases of spatial updating may represent different sources of input to the SC.