Phylogeny of hydradephagan water beetles inferred from 18S rRNA sequences

Several families in the beetle suborder Adephaga have an aquatic life style and are commonly grouped in the "Hydradephaga," but their monophyly is contentious and relationships between and within these families are poorly understood. Here we present full-length 18S rRNA sequence for 84 species of Hydradephaga, including representatives of most major groups down to the tribal level, and a total of 68 species of the largest family, Dytiscidae. Using a direct optimization method for the alignment of length-variable regions, the preferred tree topology was obtained when the cost of gaps and the cost of nucleotide changes were equal, and three hypervariable regions of 18S rRNA were downweighted by a factor of five. Confirming recent molecular studies, the Hydradephaga were found to be monophyletic, indicating a single colonization of the aquatic medium. The most basal group within Hydradephaga is Gyrinidae, followed in a comb-like arrangement by families Haliplidae, Noteridae, Amphizoidae, and Hygrobiidae plus Dytiscidae. Under most alignment parameters, Hygrobiidae is placed amid Dytiscidae in an unstable position, suggesting a possible data artifact. Basal relationships within Dytiscidae are not well established, nor is the monophyly of subfamilies Hydroporinae and Colymbetinae. In contrast, relationships at the genus level appear generally well supported. Despite the great differences in the rates of change and the significant incongruence of the phylogenetic signal in conserved vs hypervariable regions of the 18S rRNA gene, both contribute to establish relationships at all taxonomic levels.     

Higher-level snake phylogeny inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences of 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes

Portions of two mitochondrial genes (12S and 16S ribosomal RNA) were sequenced to determine the phylogenetic relationships among the major clades of snakes. Thirty-six species, representing nearly all extant families, were examined and compared with sequences of a tuatara and three families of lizards. Snakes were found to constitute a monophyletic group (confidence probability [CP] = 96%), with the scolecophidians (blind snakes) as the most basal lineages (CP = 99%). This finding supports the hypothesis that snakes underwent a subterranean period early in their evolution. Caenophidians (advanced snakes), excluding Acrochordus, were found to be monophyletic (CP = 99%). Among the caenophidians, viperids were monophyletic (CP = 98%) and formed the sister group to the elapids plus colubrids (CP = 94%). Within the viperids, two monophyletic groups were identified: true vipers (CP = 98%) and pit vipers plus Azemiops (CP = 99%). The elapids plus Atractaspis formed a monophyletic clade (CP = 99%). Within the paraphyletic Colubridae, the largely Holarctic Colubrinae was found to be a monophyletic assemblage (CP = 98%), and the Xenodontinae was found to be polyphyletic (CP = 91%). Monophyly of the henophidians (primitive snakes) was neither supported nor rejected because of the weak resolution of relationships among those taxa, except for the clustering of Calabaria with a uropeltid, Rhinophis (CP = 94%).      

Molecular phylogeny of Gastrotricha on the basis of a comparison of the 18S rRNA genes: Rejection of the hypothesis of a relationship between Gastrotricha and Nematoda

Gastrotricha are the small meiobenthic acoelomate worms whose phylogenetic relationships between themselves and other invertebrates remain unclear, despite all attempts to clarify them on the basis of both morphological and molecular analyses. The complete sequences of the 18S rRNA genes (8 new and 7 known) were analyzed in 15 Gastrotricha species to test different hypotheses on the phylogeny of this taxon and to determine the reasons for the contradictions in earlier results. The data were analyzed using both maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Based on the results, it was assumed that gastrotrichs form a monophyletic group within the Spiralia clade, which also includes Gnathostomulida, Plathelminthes, Syndermata (Rotifera + Acanthocephala), Nemertea, and Lophotrochozoa. Statistical tests rejected a phylogenetic hypotheses considering Gastrotricha to be closely related to Nematoda and other Ecdysozoa or placing them at the base of the Bilateria tree, close to Acoela or Nemertodermatida. Among gastrotrichs, species belonging to the orders Chaetonotida and Macrodasyida form two well-supported clades. The analysis confirmed monophyly of the families Chaetonotidae and Xenotrichulidae from the order Chaetonida, as well as the families Turbanellidae and Thaumastodermatidae from the order Macrodasyida. Lepidodasyidae is a polyphyletic family, because the genus Mesodasys forms a sister group for Turbanellidae; genus Cephalodasys forms a separate branch at the base of Macrodasyida; and Lepidodasys groups with Neodasys between Thaumastodermatidae and Turbanellidae. To confirm these conclusions and to get an authentic view of the phylogeny of Gastrotricha, it is necessary to study more Gastrotricha species and to analyze some other genes.     

The phylogenetic position of Siboglinidae (Annelida) inferred from 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA and morphological data

We assess the phylogenetic position of Siboglinidae (previously known as the phyla Pogonophora and Vestimentifera, but now referred to Annelida) in parsimony analyses of 1100 bp from 18S rRNA, 320 bp from the D1 region of 28S rRNA, and 107 morphological characters, totaling 667 parsimony informative characters. The 34 terminal taxa, apart from six siboglinids, include polychaete members of Sabellida, Terbelliformia, Cirratuliformia and Spionida, plus two Aciculata polychaetes as outgroups. Our results contradict most recent hypotheses in showing a sistergroup relationship between Siboglinidae and Oweniidae, and in that the latter taxon is not a member of Sabellida. Furthermore, our results indicate that Sabellariidae is not closely related to Sabellida, that Serpulidae may be nested within Sabellidae, and that Alvinellidae is nested within Ampharetidae. © The Willi Hennig Society 2004.     

The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences

Partial 18S rRNA sequences of five chelicerate arthropods plus a crustacean, myriapod, insect, chordate, echinoderm, annelid, and platyhelminth were compared. The sequence data were used to infer phylogeny by using a maximum-parsimony method, an evolutionary-distance method, and the evolutionary-parsimony method. The phylogenetic inferences generated by maximum-parsimony and distance methods support both monophyly of the Arthropoda and monophyly of the Chelicerata within the Arthropoda. These results are congruent with phylogenies based on rigorous cladistic analyses of morphological characters. Results support the inclusion of the Arthropoda within a spiralian or protostome coelomate clade that is the sister group of a deuterostome clade, refuting the hypothesis that the arthropods represent the "primitive" sister group of a protostome coelomate clade. Bootstrap analyses and consideration of all trees within 1% of the length of the most parsimonious tree suggest that relationships between the nonchelicerate arthropods and relationships within the chelicerate clade cannot be reliably inferred with the partial 18S rRNA sequence data. With the evolutionary-parsimony method, support for monophyly of the Arthropoda is found in the majority of the combinations analyzed if the coelomates are used as "outgroups." Monophyly of the Chelicerata is supported in most combinations assessed. Our analyses also indicate that the evolutionary-parsimony method, like distance and parsimony, may be biased by taxa with long branches. We suggest that a previous study's inference of the Arthropoda as paraphyletic may be the result of (a) having two few arthropod taxa available for analysis and (b) including long-branched taxa.      

Monophyly of the order Rodentia inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences of the genes for 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, and tRNA-valine

A recent analysis of amino acid sequence data (Graur et al.) suggested that the mammalian order Rodentia is polyphyletic, in contrast to most morphological data, which support rodent monophyly. At issue is whether the hystricognath rodents, such as the guinea pig, represent an independent evolutionary lineage within mammals, separate from the sciurognath rodents. To resolve this problem, we sequenced a region (2,645 bp) of the mitochondrial genome of the guinea pig containing the complete 12S ribosomal RNA, 16S ribosomal RNA, and transfer RNA(VAL) genes for comparison with the available sciurognath and other mammalian sequences. Several methods of analysis and statistical tests of the data all show strong support for rodent monophyly (91%-98% bootstrap probability, or BP). Calibration with the mammalian fossil record suggests a Cretaceous date (107 mya) for the divergence of sciurognaths and hystricognaths. An older date (38 mya) for the controversial Mus- Rattus divergence also is supported by these data. Our neighbor-joining analyses of all available sequence data (25 genes) confirm that some individual genes support rodent polyphyly but that tandem analysis of all data does not. We propose that the conflicting results are due to several compounding factors. The unique biochemical properties of some hystricognath metabolic proteins, largely responsible for generating this controversy, may have a single explanation: a cascade effect resulting from inactivation of the zinc-binding abilities of insulin. After excluding six genes possibly affected by insulin inactivation, analyses of all available sequence data (7,117 nucleotide sites, 3,099 amino acid sites) resulted in strong support for rodent monophyly (94% BP for DNA sequences, 90% for protein sequences), which lends support to the insulin-cascade hypothesis.      

Phylogenetic relationship among cockroach families inferred from mitochondrial12S rRNA gene sequence

A number of phylogenies exist for cockroaches that differ in the postulated relationships among families and genera. The relationship of the wood-feeding genus, Cryptocercus, to other cockroach families and to termites, has generated considerable debate. Grandcolas (1994), based on morphological analysis, synonymized the family Cryptocercidae with Polyphagidae and placed the genus Cryptocercus in the subfamily Polyphaginae. To determine if an independent set of characters supports the placement of Cryptocercus in Polyphaginae, a phylogenetic analysis of relationships among representative genera of the five cockroach families was undertaken. DNA sequence of a -430 base pair portion of the mitochondrial small ribosomal subunit gene from representatives of Blattidae, Blattellidae, Blaberidae and Cryptocercus, previously published by Kambhampati (1995) and Kambhampati et al. (1996), and the homologous sequence from representatives of Polyphagidae were used in the analysis. A total of twenty cockroach taxa and three termite genera were included in the study. Because a recent study showed that Cryptocercus punctulatus consists of a species complex, DNA sequence from four individuals collected in different parts of the U.S.A. was included in the study. The trees estimated from parsimony and neighbour-joining analyses indicated that Cryptocercus is a monophyletic clade which is most closely related to members of Blattidae. Polyphagidae is indicated as a sister group to the Blattidae + Cryptocercus complex, suggesting that Polyphagidae may belong to the superfamily Blattoidea rather than to Blaberoidea as proposed by McKittrick (1964). Blaberidae and Blattellidae were sister groups as previously proposed. Based on the present analysis, I propose that the genus Cryptocercus be retained in the family Cryptocercidae. Cockroaches     

Evidence that in higher plants the 25S and 18S rRNA genes are not interspersed with genes for 5S rRNA

DNA samples from various higher plants (Phaseolus aureus, Glycine max, Matthiola incana, Brassica pekinensis, Cucumis melo) were centrifuged in actinomycin-caesium chloride gradients and the genes coding for the ribosomal RNAs were detected by hybridisation with tritium labelled 5S and 25S+18S rRNA, respectively. With DNA of low molecular weight (< 5×10⁶ daltons) the 5S and 25S+18S rRNA genes are often fractionated together. A good separation of the genes for 25S+18S rRNA from the 5S rRNA genes occurred only with high molecular weight DNA (> 10×10⁶ daltons) indicating that at least most of the 5S rRNA genes are not linked to, or interspersed with, the genes coding for 25S and 18S rRNA. This result is in agreement with the situation in animal cells and in contrast to that reported for bacteria, lower eukaryotes and chloroplasts.     

Interrelationships among gekkonid geckos inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences

Gekkonid geckos, representing more than 85 percent of the gekkotan genera, are found on all major land masses and almost all oceanic islands in the tropics and subtropics. Intergeneric relationships of the Gekkonidae have been far more difficult to resolve than those among other gekkotan families. Our data set consists of a large number of complete mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene sequences and partial nuclear C-mos gene sequences for 33 genera of geckos, two genera of pygopods and two genera of eublepharids. Maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) trees were generated based on unweighted analysis using PAUP 4.0b10. Bayesian inference (BI) analyses trees were generated by MrBayes 3.0B4. All phylogenetic trees supported the monophyly of Gekkonidae with great confidence. The 12S data and combined data (12S and C-mos) place Sphaerodactylus deeply within gekkonine geckos, whereas Teratoscincus+Pristurus are the sister group of the remaining gekkonids. However, it is known that 12S may be positively misleading when dealing with older divergences. Therefore, the conflict between the results in this study and the latest conclusions based on C-mos points to the need for future focus on the phylogenetic position of both Sphaerodactylus and Teratoscincus.     

Molecular phylogeny of Anomalodesmata (Mollusca: Bivalvia) inferred from 18S rRNA sequences

The origin of the anomalodesmatan bivalves and the relationships of the constituent families are far from being settled. Phylogenetic uncertainties result from the morphological heterogeneity of the Anomalodesmata and from parallel/convergent evolution of several character complexes due to similar life habits. Here, we assess these problems with 26 near-complete anomalodesmatan 18S rRNA sequences from 12 out of 15 families and a selection of heteroconch outgroup taxa. The robustly monophyletic Anomalodesmata share insertions in the V2 and V4 expansion regions. Both parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses confirm their position among the basal heterodonts rooting between Carditidae and Lucinidae or, together with the latter, between Carditidae and the remaining Heterodonta. There is no support for monophyletic Myoida, nor for a close relationship of Anomalodesmata with any myoid taxon. At the base of the Anomalodesmata is an unstable cluster of long-branch species belonging to the Poromyidae, Verticordiidae, Lyonsiellidae and Thraciidae. The remaining Anomalodesmata split consistently but with varying branch support into three major clades: the Cuspidariidae excluding Myonera ; a 'thraciid' clade consisting of (Euciroidae, ( Myonera ( Thracia, Cleidothaerus , Myochamidae))); and a 'lyonsiid' clade with Laternulidae, Pandoridae, diphyletic Lyonsiidae due to a robust clade of Lyonsia norwegica and the clavagellid Brechites vaginiferus . Tests of various alternative topologies showed that all are significantly longer but optimal likelihood trees with monophyletic carnivorous taxa and/or Thraciidae are not significantly less likely. These results differ greatly from previous morphological studies. Palaeontological data and homology decisions for selected characters are evaluated in the light of the molecular trees.  © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2003, 139 , 229–246.     

Analysis of 18S rRNA gene sequences suggests significant molecular differences between Macrodasyida and Chaetonotida (Gastrotricha)

Partial 18S rRNA gene sequences of four macrodasyid and one chaetonotid gastrotrichs were obtained and compared with the available sequences of other gastrotrich species and representatives of various metazoan phyla. Contrary to the earlier molecular data, the gastrotrich sequences did not comprise a monophyletic group but formed two distinct clades, corresponding to the Macrodasyida and Chaetonotida, with the basal position occupied by the sequences of Tetranchyroderma sp. and Xenotrichula sp., respectively. Depending on the taxon sampling and methods of analysis, the two clades were separated by various combinations of clades Rotifera, Gnathostomulida, and Platyhelminthes, and never formed a clade with Nematoda. Thus, monophyly of the Gastrotricha is not confirmed by analysis of the presently available molecular data.     

Phylogenetic relationships of African microhylid frogs inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes

The phylogenetic relationships of microhylid frogs are poorly understood. The first molecular phylogeny for continental African microhylids is presented, including representatives of all subfamilies, six of the eight genera, and the enigmatic hemisotid Hemisus. Mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA sequence data were analysed using parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian methods. Analyses of the data are consistent with the monophyly of all sampled subfamilies and genera. Hemisus does not nest within either brevicipitines or non-brevicipitines. It is possibly the sister group to brevicipitines, in which case brevicipitines might not be microhylids. Phrynomantis and Hoplophryne potentially group with non-African, non-brevicipitine microhylids, in agreement with recent morphological and molecular data. Within brevicipitines, Breviceps is recovered as the sister group to a clade of Callulina+Spelaeophryne+Probreviceps. The relationships among the genera within this latter clade are unclear, being sensitive to the method of analysis. Optimal trees suggest the Probreviceps macrodactylus subspecies complex might be paraphyletic with respect to P. uluguruensis, corroborating preliminary morphological studies indicating that P. m. rungwensis may be a distinct species. P. m. loveridgei may be paraphyletic with respect to P. m. macrodactylus, though this is not strongly supported. Some biogeographic hypotheses are examined in light of these findings.     

New insight into the phylogeny of Mesozoa: Evidence from the 18S and 28S rRNA genes

The phylogenetic relationships of two Mesozoa groups were studied by the comparative analysis of complete sequences of 18S and 28S rRNA. Two groups of Mesozoa were found to form a statistically supported clade in phylogenetic trees. The results of the analysis placed Mesozoa in the Spiralia group of Lophotrochozoa and showed the tendency of Mesozoa to converge with one of the Annelida groups.     

Phylogeny of protostome moulting animals (Ecdysozoa) inferred from 18 and 28S rRNA gene sequences

Reliability of reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships within a group of protostome moulting animals was evaluated by means of comparison of 18 and 28S rRNA gene sequences sets both taken separately and combined. Reliability of reconstructions was evaluated by values of the bootstrap support of major phylogenetic tree nodes and by degree of congruence of phylogenetic trees inferred by various methods. By both criteria, phylogenetic trees reconstructed from the combined 18 and 28S rRNA gene sequences were better than those inferred from 18 and 28S sequences taken separately. Results obtained are consistent with phylogenetic hypothesis separating protostome animals into two major clades, moulting Ecdysozoa (Priapulida + Kinorhyncha, Nematoda + Nematomorpha, Onychophora + Tardigrada, Myriapoda + Chelicerata, Crustacea + Hexapoda) and unmoulting Lophotrochozoa (Plathelminthes, Nemertini, Annelida, Mollusca, Echiura, Sipuncula). Clade Cephalorhyncha does not include nematomorphs (Nematomorpha). Conclusion was taken that it is necessary to use combined 18 and 28S data in phylogenetic studies.     

On the phylogenetic positions of the Caryophyllidea, Pseudophyllidea and Proteocephalidea (Eucestoda) inferred from 18S rRNA

A phylogenetic analysis of tapeworms (Eucestoda) based on complete sequences of the 18S rRNA genes of 43 taxa (including new sequences of 12 species) was carried out, with the emphasis on the groups parasitising teleost fish and reptiles. Spathebothriidea and Trypanorhyncha (the latter group being paraphyletic) appeared as basal groups of the Eucestoda but their position was not stable. The tetrafossate orders (Litobothriidea, Lecanicephalidea, Tetraphyllidea, Proteocephalidea, Nippotaeniidea, Tetrabothriidea and Cyclophyllidea) were well separated from the remaining groups. Results supported polyphyly of the Pseudophyllidea formed by two distinct clades: one with diphyllobothriids (Diphyllobothrium, Schistocephalus, Spirometra and Duthiersia) and another including Abothrium, Probothriocephalus, Eubothrium and Bothriocephalus. The former pseudophyllidean clade formed a separate branch with the Caryophyllidea (Khawia and Hunterella) and Haplobothriidea (Haplobothrium), the latter taxon being closely related to either caryophyllideans or diphyllobothriids in different analyses. Proteocephalideans formed a monophyletic group in all analyses and constituted a clade within the Tetraphyllidea thus rendered paraphyletic. Within the Proteocephalidea, the Acanthotaeniinae (Acanthotaenia from reptiles in Africa) and Gangesiinae (Gangesia and Silurotaenia from silurid fish in the Palearctic Region) were separated from parasites of freshwater fish and mammals. The family Proteocephalidae was found to be paraphyletic due to the placement of a monticelliid species, Monticellia sp., in a clade within the former family. The genus Proteocephalus appeared as an artificial assemblage of unrelated taxa which is congruent with previous molecular analyses.     

从12S rRNA基因序列推测鹭科13种鸟类的系统发生关系

对鹭科12个种的线粒体12S rRNA基因全长约975bp的序列进行了测定,并从GenBank获得黄顶夜鹭12S rRNA基因全序列。比对后的序列长993bp,含363变异位点,288个多态位点,187个简约信息位点。使用邻接法和最大简约法重建的分子系统树将13种鹭聚为2支：第一支包括白鹭、中白鹭、大白鹭、池鹭、牛背鹭、苍鹭、草鹭、夜鹭、黄顶夜鹭,第二支由黄苇渴Gan、黑苇Gan、栗苇Gan、大麻Gan组成。结果提示将鹭科分为鹭亚科和Gan亚科的传统观点是合理的,不支持Payne将鹭科分为日鹭亚科(Ardeinae)、夜鹭亚科(Nycticracinae)、Gan亚科(Botaurinae)和虎鹭亚科(Tigrisomatinae)的观点。进一步的分析表明：白鹭在系统演化中要早于大白鹭和中白鹭分支出来,大白鹭和中白鹭与苍鹭、草鹭和牛背鹭间的亲缘关系较近,而与白鹭较远,支持Sibley(1990)将大白鹭和中白鹭作为独立的大白鹭属(Casmerodius)和中白鹭属(Mesophoyx)的建议;黑Gan、栗苇Gan与黄苇Gan在系统发生中构成一单系群,提示将黑Gan置于苇Gan属(Ixobrychus)是合适的[动物学报49(2)：205—210,2003]。     

Phylogenetic relationships among four species of Mullidae (Perciformes) inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome b and 16S rRNA genes

DNA sequence comparisons of two mitochondrial DNA genes were used to infer phylogenetic relationships among four species of mullids. Approximately 238 bp of the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and 261 bp of the cytochrome b (cytb) genes were sequenced from representatives of three mullid genera (Mullus, Upeneus, Pseudopeneus), present in the Mediterranean Sea. Trees were constructed using three methods: maximum likelihood (ML), neighbor joining (NJ) and parsimony (MP). The results of the analyses of these data together with published data of the same mtDNA segments of two other perciform species (Sparus aurata, Perca fluviatilis), support the previous taxonomic classification of the three genera examined, as well as the classification of the two red mullet species in the same genus.