Chemical and microbiological changes in laboratory incubations of nitrate amendment "sour" produced waters from three western Canadian oil fields

Nitrate addition to oil field waters stops the biogenic formation of sulfide because the activities of nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) suppress the activities of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). In general, there are two types of NRB — the heterotrophic NRB and the chemolithotrophic NRB. Within the latter group are the nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria (NR-SOB). To date, no study has specifically addressed the roles of these different NRB in controlling sulfide concentrations in oil field produced waters. This study used different culture media to selectively enumerate heterotrophic NRB and NR-SOB by most probable number (MPN) methods. Produced waters from three sulfide-containing western Canadian oil fields were amended with nitrate as an electron acceptor, but no exogenous electron donor was added to the serum bottle microcosms. Changes in the chemical and microbiological characteristics of the produced waters were monitored during incubation at 21°C. In less than 4 days, the sulfide was removed from the waters from two of the oil fields (designated P and C), whereas nearly 27 days were required for sulfide removal from the water from the third oil field (designated N). Nitrate addition stimulated large increases in the number of the heterotrophic NRB and NR-SOB in the waters from oil fields P and C, but only the NR-SOB were stimulated in the water from oil field N. These data suggest that stimulation of the heterotrophic NRB is required for rapid removal of sulfide from oil field-produced waters. Received 25 March 2002/ Accepted in revised form 10 June 2002     

Microbial analysis of backflowed injection water from a nitrate-treated North Sea oil reservoir

Reservoir souring in offshore oil fields is caused by hydrogen sulphide (H₂S) produced by sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB), most often as a consequence of sea water injection. Biocide treatment is commonly used to inhibit SRB, but has now been replaced by nitrate treatment on several North Sea oil fields. At the Statfjord field, injection wells from one nitrate-treated reservoir and one biocide-treated reservoir were reversed (backflowed) and sampled for microbial analysis. The two reservoirs have similar properties and share the same pre-nitrate treatment history. A 16S rRNA gene-based community analysis (PCR-DGGE) combined with enrichment culture studies showed that, after 6 months of nitrate injection (0.25 mM NO₃ ⁻), heterotrophic and chemolithotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) formed major populations in the nitrate-treated reservoir. The NRB community was able to utilize the same substrates as the SRB community. Compared to the biocide-treated reservoir, the microbial community in the nitrate-treated reservoir was more phylogenetically diverse and able to grow on a wider range of substrates. Enrichment culture studies showed that SRB were present in both reservoirs, but the nitrate-treated reservoir had the least diverse SRB community. Isolation and characterisation of one of the dominant populations observed during nitrate treatment (strain STF-07) showed that heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria affiliated to Terasakiella probably contributed significantly to the inhibition of SRB. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

The influence of nitrate on microbial processes in oil industry production waters

Sulfide accumulation due to bacterial sulfate reduction is responsible for a number of serious problems in the oil industry. Among the strategies to control the activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) is the use of nitrate, which can exhibit a variety of effects. We investigated the relevance of this approach to souring oil fields in Oklahoma and Alberta in which water flooding is used to enhance oil recovery. SRB and nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) were enumerated in produced waters from both oil fields. In the Oklahoma field, the rates of sulfate reduction ranged from 0.05 to 0.16 μM S day⁻¹ at the wellheads, and an order of magnitude higher at the oil–water separator. Sulfide production was greatest in the water storage tanks in the Alberta field. Microbial counts alone did not accurately reflect the potential for microbial activities. The majority of the sulfide production appeared to occur after the oil was pumped aboveground, rather than in the reservoir. Laboratory experiments showed that adding 5 and 10 mM nitrate to produced waters from the Oklahoma and Alberta oil fields, respectively, decreased the sulfide content to negligible levels and increased the numbers of NRB. This work suggests that sulfate reduction control measures can be concentrated on aboveground facilities, which will decrease the amount of sulfide reinjected into reservoirs during the disposal of oil field production waters. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology (2001) 27, 80–86. Received 30 January 2001/ Accepted in revised form 30 June 2001     

Applying a most probable number method for enumerating planktonic, dissimilatory, ammonium-producing, nitrate-reducing bacteria in oil field waters

A most probable number (MPN) method was used to enumerate dissimilatory ammonium-producing, nitrate-reducing bacteria (DAP-NRB) in oil field waters and to determine whether they were stimulated by nitrate addition used to control hydrogen sulfide production. An ammonium production medium with 5 carbon and energy sources (acetate, glucose, glycerol, pyruvate, and succinate) and nitrate was used in a 3-tube MPN procedure to enumerate DAP-NRB. These bacteria were detected in 12 of 18 oil field water samples, but they were seldom detected in wellhead samples. Three oil field water samples were amended with nitrate in serum bottles and the numbers of different NRB were determined over a 38-day incubation time. This amendment stimulated increases in the numbers of heterotrophic NRB and autotrophic nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria, but DAP-NRB remained a minor portion of these communities. Overall, DAP-NRB were present in many of the oil field waters that were examined but their numbers were low. It appears that DAP-NRB would play a minor role in the consumption of nitrate injected into oil field waters for the control of hydrogen sulfide production.     

Molecular- and cultivation-based analyses of microbial communities in oil field water and in microcosms amended with nitrate to control H2S production

Nitrate injection into oil fields is an alternative to biocide addition for controlling sulfide production (‘souring’) caused by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). This study examined the suitability of several cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent methods to assess potential microbial activities (sulfidogenesis and nitrate reduction) and the impact of nitrate amendment on oil field microbiota. Microcosms containing produced waters from two Western Canadian oil fields exhibited sulfidogenesis that was inhibited by nitrate amendment. Most probable number (MPN) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses of uncultivated produced waters showed low cell numbers (≤10³ MPN/ml) dominated by SRB (>95% relative abundance). MPN analysis also detected nitrate-reducing sulfide-oxidizing bacteria (NRSOB) and heterotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria (HNRB) at numbers too low to be detected by FISH or denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). In microcosms containing produced water fortified with sulfate, near-stoichiometric concentrations of sulfide were produced. FISH analyses of the microcosms after 55 days of incubation revealed that Gammaproteobacteria increased from undetectable levels to 5–20% abundance, resulting in a decreased proportion of Deltaproteobacteria (50–60% abundance). DGGE analysis confirmed the presence of Delta- and Gammaproteobacteria and also detected Bacteroidetes. When sulfate-fortified produced waters were amended with nitrate, sulfidogenesis was inhibited and Deltaproteobacteria decreased to levels undetectable by FISH, with a concomitant increase in Gammaproteobacteria from below detection to 50–60% abundance. DGGE analysis of these microcosms yielded sequences of Gamma- and Epsilonproteobacteria related to presumptive HNRB and NRSOB (Halomonas, Marinobacterium, Marinobacter, Pseudomonas and Arcobacter), thus supporting chemical data indicating that nitrate-reducing bacteria out-compete SRB when nitrate is added.     

Transformation of iron sulfide to greigite by nitrite produced by oil field bacteria

Nitrate, injected into oil fields, can oxidize sulfide formed by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) through the action of nitrate-reducing sulfide-oxidizing bacteria (NR-SOB). When reservoir rock contains siderite (FeCO₃), the sulfide formed is immobilized as iron sulfide minerals, e.g. mackinawite (FeS). The aim of our study was to determine the extent to which oil field NR-SOB can oxidize or transform FeS. Because no NR-SOB capable of growth with FeS were isolated, the well-characterized oil field isolate Sulfurimonas sp. strain CVO was used. When strain CVO was presented with a mixture of chemically formed FeS and dissolved sulfide (HS⁻), it only oxidized the HS⁻. The FeS remained acid soluble and non-magnetic indicating that it was not transformed. In contrast, when the FeS was formed by adding FeCl₂ to a culture of SRB which gradually produced sulfide, precipitating FeS, and to which strain CVO and nitrate were subsequently added, transformation of the FeS to a magnetic, less acid-soluble form was observed. X-ray diffraction and energy-dispersive spectrometry indicated the transformed mineral to be greigite (Fe₃S₄). Addition of nitrite to cultures of SRB, containing microbially formed FeS, was similarly effective. Nitrite reacts chemically with HS⁻ to form polysulfide and sulfur (S⁰), which then transforms SRB-formed FeS to greigite, possibly via a sulfur addition pathway (3FeS + S⁰ → Fe₃S₄). Further chemical transformation to pyrite (FeS₂) is expected at higher temperatures (>60°C). Hence, nitrate injection into oil fields may lead to NR-SOB-mediated and chemical mineral transformations, increasing the sulfide-binding capacity of reservoir rock. Because of mineral volume decreases, these transformations may also increase reservoir injectivity. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Oil field souring control by nitrate-reducing Sulfurospirillum spp. that outcompete sulfate-reducing bacteria for organic electron donors

Nitrate injection into oil reservoirs can prevent and remediate souring, the production of hydrogen sulfide by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Nitrate stimulates nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria (NR-SOB) and heterotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria (hNRB) that compete with SRB for degradable oil organics. Up-flow, packed-bed bioreactors inoculated with water produced from an oil field and injected with lactate, sulfate, and nitrate served as sources for isolating several NRB, including Sulfurospirillum and Thauera spp. The former coupled reduction of nitrate to nitrite and ammonia with oxidation of either lactate (hNRB activity) or sulfide (NR-SOB activity). Souring control in a bioreactor receiving 12.5 mM lactate and 6, 2, 0.75, or 0.013 mM sulfate always required injection of 10 mM nitrate, irrespective of the sulfate concentration. Community analysis revealed that at all but the lowest sulfate concentration (0.013 mM), significant SRB were present. At 0.013 mM sulfate, direct hNRB-mediated oxidation of lactate by nitrate appeared to be the dominant mechanism. The absence of significant SRB indicated that sulfur cycling does not occur at such low sulfate concentrations. The metabolically versatile Sulfurospirillum spp. were dominant when nitrate was present in the bioreactor. Analysis of cocultures of Desulfovibrio sp. strain Lac3, Lac6, or Lac15 and Sulfurospirillum sp. strain KW indicated its hNRB activity and ability to produce inhibitory concentrations of nitrite to be key factors for it to successfully outcompete oil field SRB.     

Oil Field Souring Control by Nitrate-Reducing Sulfurospirillum spp. That Outcompete Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria for Organic Electron Donors

Nitrate injection into oil reservoirs can prevent and remediate souring, the production of hydrogen sulfide by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Nitrate stimulates nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria (NR-SOB) and heterotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria (hNRB) that compete with SRB for degradable oil organics. Up-flow, packed-bed bioreactors inoculated with water produced from an oil field and injected with lactate, sulfate, and nitrate served as sources for isolating several NRB, including Sulfurospirillum and Thauera spp. The former coupled reduction of nitrate to nitrite and ammonia with oxidation of either lactate (hNRB activity) or sulfide (NR-SOB activity). Souring control in a bioreactor receiving 12.5 mM lactate and 6, 2, 0.75, or 0.013 mM sulfate always required injection of 10 mM nitrate, irrespective of the sulfate concentration. Community analysis revealed that at all but the lowest sulfate concentration (0.013 mM), significant SRB were present. At 0.013 mM sulfate, direct hNRB-mediated oxidation of lactate by nitrate appeared to be the dominant mechanism. The absence of significant SRB indicated that sulfur cycling does not occur at such low sulfate concentrations. The metabolically versatile Sulfurospirillum spp. were dominant when nitrate was present in the bioreactor. Analysis of cocultures of Desulfovibrio sp. strain Lac3, Lac6, or Lac15 and Sulfurospirillum sp. strain KW indicated its hNRB activity and ability to produce inhibitory concentrations of nitrite to be key factors for it to successfully outcompete oil field SRB.     

Comparison of microbial communities involved in souring and corrosion in offshore and onshore oil production facilities in Nigeria

Samples were obtained from the Obigbo field, located onshore in the Niger delta, Nigeria, from which oil is produced by injection of low-sulfate groundwater, as well as from the offshore Bonga field from which oil is produced by injection of high-sulfate (2,200 ppm) seawater, amended with 45 ppm of calcium nitrate to limit reservoir souring. Despite low concentrations of sulfate (0–7 ppm) and nitrate (0 ppm), sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and heterotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) were present in samples from the Obigbo field. Biologically active deposits (BADs), scraped from corrosion-failed sections of a water- and of an oil-transporting pipeline (both Obigbo), had high counts of SRB and high sulfate and ferrous iron concentrations. Analysis of microbial community composition by pyrosequencing indicated anaerobic, methanogenic hydrocarbon degradation to be a dominant process in all samples from the Obigbo field, including the BADs. Samples from the Bonga field also had significant activity of SRB, as well as of heterotrophic and of sulfide-oxidizing NRB. Microbial community analysis indicated high proportions of potentially thermophilic NRB and near-absence of microbes active in methanogenic hydrocarbon degradation. Anaerobic incubation of Bonga samples with steel coupons gave moderate general corrosion rates of 0.045–0.049 mm/year, whereas near-zero general corrosion rates (0.001–0.002 mm/year) were observed with Obigbo water samples. Hence, methanogens may contribute to corrosion at Obigbo, but the low general corrosion rates cannot explain the reasons for pipeline failures in the Niger delta. A focus of future work should be on understanding the role of BADs in enhancing under-deposit pitting corrosion.     

Microbiological Processes in a High-Temperature Oil Field

Thermophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) oxidizing lactate, butyrate, and C₁₂–C₁₆ n-alkanes of oil at a temperature of 90°C were isolated from samples of water and oil originating from oil reservoirs of the White Tiger high-temperature oil field (Vietnam). At the same time, no thermophiles were detected in the injected seawater, which contained mesophilic microorganisms and was the site of low-temperature processes of sulfate reduction and methanogenesis. Thermophilic SRB were also found in samples of liquid taken from various engineering reservoirs used for oil storage, treatment, and transportation. These samples also contained mesophilic SRB, methanogens, aerobic oil-oxidizing bacteria, and heterotrophs. Rates of bacterial production of hydrogen sulfide varied from 0.11 to 2069.63 at 30°C and from 1.18 to 173.86 at 70°C g S/(l day); and those of methane production, varied from 58.4 to 100 629.8 nl CH₄/(l day) (at 30°C). The sulfur isotopic compositions of sulfates contained in reservoir waters and of hydrogen sulfide of the accompanying gas indicate that bacterial sulfate reduction might be effective in the depth of the oil field.     

Microbial response to reinjection of produced water in an oil reservoir

The microbial response to produced water reinjection (PWRI) in a North Sea oil field was investigated by a combination of cultivation and culture-independent molecular phylogenetic techniques. Special emphasise was put on the relationship between sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB), and results were used to evaluate the possibility of nitrate treatment as a souring management tool during PWRI. Samples were collected by reversing the flow of the injection water, which provided samples from around the injection area. The backflowed samples were compared to produced water from the same platform and to backflowed samples from a biocide-treated seawater injector, which was the previous injection water treatment of the PWRI well. Results showed that reinjection of produced water promoted growth of thermophilic SRB. Thermophilic fatty acid oxidising NRB and potential nitrate-reducing sulphide-oxidising bacteria were also found. The finding of thermophilic NRB makes nitrate treatment during PWRI possible, although higher nitrate concentration will be necessary to compensate for the increased SRB activity.     

Second derivative UV absorbance analysis to monitor nitrate-reduction by bacteria in most probable number determinations

Heterotrophic and autotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) play important roles in many environments. These bacteria are often enumerated by most probable number (MPN) methods. Measuring NO(3)(-) depletion in the MPN cultures is the definitive way to determine the presence of NRB. Media used for MPN determinations of NRB in oil field waters usually contain high Cl(-) concentrations, matching those in the water samples. Many methods for measuring NO(3)(-) concentrations, such as ion chromatography (IC), cadmium reduction and ion electrode methods, are adversely affected by high concentrations of Cl(-) and organic compounds. A second derivative UV absorbance method proved to be a fast and reliable means for measuring NO(3)(-) depletion in MPN media used for enumerating autotrophic and heterotrophic NRB, without interferences from Cl(-) or the organic components in the latter medium. The MPN results for heterotrophic NRB determined by the second derivative UV absorbance agreed well with those determined by the production of nitrous oxide, and were often higher than those determined by measuring nitrate depletion by the diphenylamine spot test.     

Competitive oxidation of volatile fatty acids by sulfate- and nitrate-reducing bacteria from an oil field in Argentina

Acetate, propionate, and butyrate, collectively referred to as volatile fatty acids (VFA), are considered among the most important electron donors for sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and heterotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria (hNRB) in oil fields. Samples obtained from a field in the Neuquén Basin, western Argentina, had significant activity of mesophilic SRB, hNRB, and nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria (NR-SOB). In microcosms, containing VFA (3 mM each) and excess sulfate, SRB first used propionate and butyrate for the production of acetate, which reached concentrations of up to 12 mM prior to being used as an electron donor for sulfate reduction. In contrast, hNRB used all three organic acids with similar kinetics, while reducing nitrate to nitrite and nitrogen. Transient inhibition of VFA-utilizing SRB was observed with 0.5 mM nitrite and permanent inhibition with concentrations of 1 mM or more. The addition of nitrate to medium flowing into an upflow, packed-bed bioreactor with an established VFA-oxidizing SRB consortium led to a spike of nitrite up to 3 mM. The nitrite-mediated inhibition of SRB led, in turn, to the transient accumulation of up to 13 mM of acetate. The complete utilization of nitrate and the incomplete utilization of VFA, especially propionate, and sulfate indicated that SRB remained partially inhibited. Hence, in addition to lower sulfide concentrations, an increase in the concentration of acetate in the presence of sulfate in waters produced from an oil field subjected to nitrate injection may indicate whether the treatment is successful. The microbial community composition in the bioreactor, as determined by culturing and culture-independent techniques, indicated shifts with an increasing fraction of nitrate. With VFA and sulfate, the SRB genera Desulfobotulus, Desulfotignum, and Desulfobacter as well as the sulfur-reducing Desulfuromonas and the NR-SOB Arcobacter were detected. With VFA and nitrate, Pseudomonas spp. were present. hNRB/NR-SOB from the genus Sulfurospirillum were found under all conditions.     

Sulfide persistence in oil field waters amended with nitrate and acetate

Nitrate amendment is normally an effective method for sulfide control in oil field-produced waters. However, this approach has occasionally failed to prevent sulfide accumulation, despite the presence of active nitrate-reducing bacterial populations. Here, we report our study of bulk chemical transformations in microcosms of oil field waters containing nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria, but lacking denitrifying heterotrophs. Amendment with combinations of nitrate, acetate, and phosphate altered the microbial sulfur and nitrogen transformations. Elemental sulfur produced by chemotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria was re-reduced heterotrophically to sulfide. Ammonification, rather than denitrification, was the predominant pathway for nitrate reduction. The application of nitrite led to transient sulfide depletion, possibly due to higher rates of nitrite reduction. The addition of molybdate suppressed both the accumulation of sulfide and the heterotrophic reduction of nitrate. Therefore, sulfidogenesis was likely due to elemental sulfur-reducing heterotrophic bacteria, and the nitrate-reducing microbial community consisted mainly of facultatively chemotrophic microbes. This study describes one set of conditions for continued sulfidogenesis during nitrate reduction, with important implications for nitrate control of sulfide production in oil fields.     

Acetate Production from Oil under Sulfate-Reducing Conditions in Bioreactors Injected with Sulfate and Nitrate

Oil production by water injection can cause souring in which sulfate in the injection water is reduced to sulfide by resident sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Sulfate (2 mM) in medium injected at a rate of 1 pore volume per day into upflow bioreactors containing residual heavy oil from the Medicine Hat Glauconitic C field was nearly completely reduced to sulfide, and this was associated with the generation of 3 to 4 mM acetate. Inclusion of 4 mM nitrate inhibited souring for 60 days, after which complete sulfate reduction and associated acetate production were once again observed. Sulfate reduction was permanently inhibited when 100 mM nitrate was injected by the nitrite formed under these conditions. Pulsed injection of 4 or 100 mM nitrate inhibited sulfate reduction temporarily. Sulfate reduction resumed once nitrate injection was stopped and was associated with the production of acetate in all cases. The stoichiometry of acetate formation (3 to 4 mM formed per 2 mM sulfate reduced) is consistent with a mechanism in which oil alkanes and water are metabolized to acetate and hydrogen by fermentative and syntrophic bacteria (K. Zengler et al., Nature 401:266–269, 1999), with the hydrogen being used by SRB to reduce sulfate to sulfide. In support of this model, microbial community analyses by pyrosequencing indicated SRB of the genus Desulfovibrio, which use hydrogen but not acetate as an electron donor for sulfate reduction, to be a major community component. The model explains the high concentrations of acetate that are sometimes found in waters produced from water-injected oil fields.     

The effect of long-term nitrate treatment on SRB activity,corrosion rate and bacterial community composition in offshore water injection systems

Biogenic production of hydrogen sulphide (H₂S) is a problem for the oil industry as it leads to corrosion and reservoir souring. Continuous injection of a low nitrate concentration (0.25–0.33 mM) replaced glutaraldehyde as corrosion and souring control at the Veslefrikk and Gullfaks oil field (North Sea) in 1999. The response to nitrate treatment was a rapid reduction in number and activity of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in the water injection system biofilm at both fields. The present long-term study shows that SRB activity has remained low at ≤0.3 and ≤0.9 μg H₂S/cm²/day at Veslefrikk and Gullfaks respectively, during the 7–8 years with continuous nitrate injection. At Veslefrikk, 16S rRNA gene based community analysis by PCR–DGGE showed that bacteria affiliated to nitrate-reducing sulphide-oxidizing Sulfurimonas (NR–SOB) formed major populations at the injection well head throughout the treatment period. Downstream of deaerator the presence of Sulfurimonas like bacteria was less pronounced, and were no longer observed 40 months into the treatment period. The biofilm community during nitrate treatment was highly diverse and relative stable for long periods of time. At the Gullfaks field, a reduction in corrosion of up to 40% was observed after switch to nitrate treatment. The present study show that nitrate injection may provide a stable long-term inhibition of SRB in sea water injection systems, and that corrosion may be significantly reduced when compared to traditional biocide treatment.     

Storage of oil field-produced waters alters their chemical and microbiological characteristics

Many oil fields are in remote locations, and the time required for shipment of produced water samples for microbiological examination may be lengthy. No studies have reported on how storage of oil field waters can change their characteristics. Produced water samples from three Alberta oil fields were collected in sterile, industry-approved 4-l epoxy-lined steel cans, sealed with minimal headspace and stored under anoxic conditions for 14 days at either 4°C or room temperature (ca. 21°C). Storage resulted in significant changes in water chemistry, microbial number estimates and/or community response to amendment with nitrate. During room-temperature storage, activity and growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria (and, to a lesser extent, fermenters and methanogens) in the samples led to significant changes in sulfide, acetate and propionate concentrations as well as a significant increase in most probable number estimates, particularly of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Sulfide production during room-temperature storage was likely to be responsible for the altered response to nitrate amendment observed in microcosms containing sulfidogenic samples. Refrigerated storage suppressed sulfate reduction and growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria. However, declines in sulfide concentrations were observed in two of the three samples stored at 4°C, suggesting abiotic losses of sulfide. In one of the samples stored at room temperature, nitrate amendment led to ammonification. These results demonstrate that storage of oil field water samples for 14 days, such as might occur because of lengthy transport times or delays before analysis in the laboratory, can affect microbial numbers and activity as well as water sample chemistry.     

Ammonium Concentrations in Produced Waters from a Mesothermic Oil Field Subjected to Nitrate Injection Decrease through Formation of Denitrifying Biomass and Anammox Activity

Community analysis of a mesothermic oil field, subjected to continuous field-wide injection of nitrate to remove sulfide, with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes indicated the presence of heterotrophic and sulfide-oxidizing, nitrate-reducing bacteria (hNRB and soNRB). These reduce nitrate by dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (e.g., Sulfurospirillum and Denitrovibrio) or by denitrification (e.g., Sulfurimonas, Arcobacter, and Thauera). Monitoring of ammonium concentrations in producing wells (PWs) indicated that denitrification was the main pathway for nitrate reduction in the field: breakthrough of nitrate and nitrite in two PWs was not associated with an increase in the ammonium concentration, and no increase in the ammonium concentration was seen in any of 11 producing wells during periods of increased nitrate injection. Instead, ammonium concentrations in produced waters decreased on average from 0.3 to 0.2 mM during 2 years of nitrate injection. Physiological studies with produced water-derived hNRB microcosms indicated increased biomass formation associated with denitrification as a possible cause for decreasing ammonium concentrations. Use of anammox-specific primers and cloning of the resulting PCR product gave clones affiliated with the known anammox genera “Candidatus Brocadia” and “Candidatus Kuenenia,” indicating that the anammox reaction may also contribute to declining ammonium concentrations. Overall, the results indicate the following: (i) that nitrate injected into an oil field to oxidize sulfide is primarily reduced by denitrifying bacteria, of which many genera have been identified by DGGE, and (ii) that perhaps counterintuitively, nitrate injection leads to decreasing ammonium concentrations in produced waters.Nitrate is injected into oil fields to remedy souring (34, 37, 38), the reduction of sulfate to sulfide coupled to the oxidation of oil organics that is catalyzed by resident sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Nitrate acts by stimulating heterotrophic nitrate-reducing bacteria (hNRB) and sulfide-oxidizing, nitrate-reducing bacteria (soNRB), collectively referred to as NRB. The former can compete with SRB for the same oil organics, whereas the latter remove produced sulfide by oxidation to sulfur and sulfate. Both groups reduce nitrate to nitrite and then to either N₂ or ammonium by denitrification or dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), respectively (7, 13). The produced nitrite strongly inhibits dissimilatory sulfite reductase (Dsr), the enzyme responsible for sulfide production by SRB. Hence, nitrite can be regarded as a magic bullet, which targets SRB metabolism exactly where desired. Some SRB can overcome nitrite inhibition by an Nrf-type periplasmic nitrite reductase, which reduces nitrite to ammonium, preventing its inflow into the cytoplasm, where Dsr is located (10, 12).Oil fields are ideal windows into the subsurface, allowing monitoring of produced waters for the presence of chemical compounds and microbes that are active in the sulfur and nitrogen cycles (8, 9, 26, 28, 34, 37, 38). The Enermark Medicine Hat Glauconitic C field (the Enermark field) in southeastern Alberta, Canada, produces oil from a depth of 850 m (down-hole temperature of 30°C) through produced water reinjection (PWRI) (see Fig. ​Fig.1).1). In 2007, the water plants (WPs) had an output of approximately 2,500 m³ of injection water per day, of which 25% was make-up water (MW). The latter was mostly the purified and chlorinated water from the municipal sewage plant and is the only input of sulfate (4 to 5 mM) in the system, giving the injection water an average sulfate concentration of ∼1 mM. Although oil (1,000 m³/day) has been produced through PWRI since 2000, souring did not become a problem until 2006. To control souring, a 45% (wt/wt) calcium nitrate concentrate has been injected since May 7, 2007 (week 1), as follows: (i) continuous field-wide injection of 2.4 mM nitrate at the WPs, which is still going on today, (ii) application of batches of high nitrate concentration (1 h/week; peak concentration of 760 mM) at a single injection well (IW) (14-IW) from week 33 to 101, and (iii) field-wide injection of pulses of weekly alternating high (14 mM) or low (2.4 mM) nitrate concentrations at the WPs from week 64 to 96. Continuous nitrate injection lowered the sulfide concentration, but this was followed by a recovery (39). Zero sulfide at two PWs was obtained through batchwise or pulsed injection. The results indicated that continuous injection leads to microbial zonation (39), in which hNRB grow in the near-injection wellbore region (see Fig. ​Fig.1,1, zone A) whereas SRB grow deeper in the reservoir (see Fig. ​Fig.1,1, zone B). This causes injected nitrate to be primarily reduced by hNRB through oxidation of oil components, like toluene (20), without reaching the sulfide-producing zones deeper in the reservoir.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic representation of oil production through PWRI. The oil-water mixture pumped up at producing wells (PW) is separated, and the water is piped to a water plant, where it is mixed with make-up water. The resulting injection water is injected at injection wells. Sampling points are indicated (*). Two points of nitrate injection are indicated at the WP and at a specific IW. The Enermark field had 3 MW sources, 3 WPs, 55 IWs, and 107 PWs. Many of these are horizontal wells (not shown). The oil-producing subsurface (for the Enermark field: depth, 850 m; resident temperature, 30°C) has been divided into zones A to C, thought to harbor different microbial groups as outlined in the text.The effect of nitrate injection on aqueous sulfide concentrations emerging in produced waters from the Enermark field has thus been extensively analyzed (39). We report here on the microbial community present in these waters during nitrate injection as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and on the fate of the injected nitrate by monitoring ammonium concentrations in produced and injection waters.     

Incidence of Legionella and heterotrophic bacteria in household rainwater tanks in Azumino,Nagano prefecture,Japan

Many administrative agencies in Japan are encouraging installation of household rainwater‐storage tanks for more effective use of natural rainwater. Water samples were collected periodically from 43 rainwater tanks from 40 households and tested for the presence of Legionella species and the extent of heterotrophic bacteria in Azumino city, Nagano prefecture, Japan. PCR assays indicated the presence of Legionella spp. in 12 (30%) of the 43 tank water samples. Attempts were made to identify correlations between PCR positive samples, topography, pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD), atmospheric temperature and the numbers of heterotrophic bacteria. Between June and October, 2012, the numbers of heterotrophic bacteria in rainwater tanks and the values of COD positively correlated with the presence of Legionella species. In most of the Legionella‐positive cases, heterotrophic bacterial cell counts were >10⁴ CFU/mL. Moreover, Legionella species were less frequently detected when the COD value was >5 mg KMnO₄/L. Therefore, at least in Azumino, Japan between June and October 2012, both heterotrophic bacterial counts and COD values may be considered index parameters for the presence of Legionella cells in rainwater tanks. Much more accumulation of such data is needed to verify the accuracy of these findings.     

油田硫酸盐还原菌酸化腐蚀机制及防治研究进展

硫酸盐还原菌(Sulfate reducing bacteria,SRB)是一些厌氧产硫化氢的细菌的统称,是以有机物为养料的厌氧菌。它们广泛分布于pH值6-9的土壤、海水、河水、淤泥、地下管道、油气井、港湾及锈层中,它们生存于好气性硫细菌产生的沉积物下,其最适宜的生长温度是20-30℃,可以在高达50-60℃的温度下生存,与腐蚀相关的最主要的是脱硫脱硫弧菌(Desulfovibrio desulfuricans)。 它们是许多腐蚀问题的主因,例如油田系统金属管路的腐蚀等。在海上油田生产中,海水常被注入油井用于进行2次采油。富含硫酸盐的海水能加速油藏中SRB的生长,随之H₂S大量产生,引起油田水的酸化,H₂S具有毒性和腐蚀性,增加石油和天然气中的硫含量,并可能引起油田堵塞。SRB引起的腐蚀问题是拭待解决的最主要问题。国内外治理该问题的途径主要有物理杀灭、添加化学杀菌剂等方法,但是这些方法成本高,持续效果不显著。近几年来国外学者开始重点关注利用生物竞争排斥技术(Bio-competitive inhibition technology,BCX)控制硫酸盐还原菌的生长代谢的方法,该方法的原理为通过加入特定的药剂,激活油藏中的本源微生物或加入外源微生物,使其与SRB竞争营养源或产生代谢物抑制SRB的生长代谢,进而抑制H₂S的产生。GMT-LATA的科学家对在厌氧油气储层和开采系统中硝酸盐还原菌的作用进行了最早的研究,认为该细菌可以抑制硫酸盐还原菌的代谢活动。随后BCX技术已经在国外部分油田得到了应用,国内还没有在海油生产中应用的报道,但是也有学者对该方法进行了研究。