Toxic shock syndrome after suction lipectomy

We present a case of toxic shock syndrome with necrotizing fasciitis after suction lipectomy. The patient underwent aesthetic suction lipectomy of the abdomen, buttocks, and thighs during an office procedure by a cosmetic surgeon. On postoperative day 2, the patient was referred to the emergency department of our hospital because of pain. On admission, the patient was in toxic shock. She required intensive medical treatment for about 1 month, along with psychiatric help to adapt after the illness. Although toxic shock syndrome is a rare postoperative complication, every plastic surgeon should be acquainted with it. A combination of early recognition, diagnosis, and aggressive supportive therapy is the only successful treatment.     

Skin retraction following suction lipectomy by treatment site: a study of 500 procedures in 458 selected subjects

I identified 500 suction lipectomy procedures involving sites on the body and in the cervicofacial region in 458 selected patients and studied the influence of treatment site on postoperative skin retraction by comparing preoperative and postoperative skin condition. Postoperative skin condition was evaluated first in the immediate postoperative period (second or third day); then at a more remote date (after at least 2 months of follow-up). On the body, restoration of the preoperative condition of the skin was obtained in 94.6 percent of treatment sites in the immediate postoperative period; after a longer follow-up, this proportion was 87.9 percent because of delayed development of modifications. The time interval needed to obtain a stable result increased with increasing age, regardless of the nature of this result, as well as with the total amount of fat removed. On the neck, liposuction improved or even eliminated preexisting skin looseness, and this improvement was even more noticeable as follow-up increased. The neck thus appears as the site of choice for suction lipectomy. On the face, in contrast, favorable results deteriorated over time, a finding that leads me to advocate combination with a face-lift whenever ptosis is present. Thus treatment site obviously has a substantial impact on the potential of the skin for retracting postoperatively.     

Gynecomastia: suction lipectomy as a contemporary solution

Suction lipectomy is adapted for the correction of gynecomastia. Previous attempts using suction lipectomy for gynecomastia still required the use of sharp dissection for removal of the glandular breast tissue as well as excision of redundant skin. With this new technique, gynecomastia is corrected solely with the use of suction lipectomy. The technique is successful if the gynecomastia is due to excess fat or parenchymal hypertrophy. A 7-mm cannula is inserted first, to remove the adipose tissue. Then a 2.4-mm cannula is used to remove the glandular and ductal tissue. The 7-mm cannula is then reinserted to remove subareolar parenchyma and to make final contour adjustments. The surrounding subcutaneous tissue is easily undermined to avoid a saucer deformity and to allow for skin contraction. Patients return to full activities in 48 hours. A compressive garment is worn for 4 to 6 weeks. The results of 10 patients are discussed.     

Large-volume suction lipectomy: an analysis of 108 patients.

Suction lipectomy was initially advocated for the treatment of localized collections of fat and for the removal of less than 1500 ml of material. However, many patients wished to have multiple areas treated or had diffuse collections of fat. In such instances, the removal of over 1500 ml of material and circumferential lipectomy are necessary to provide optimal aesthetic results. However, when over 1500 ml of material is removed, anesthetic requirements, fluid replacement, and treatment of blood loss become important if the operation is to be performed safely. We have treated 108 patients who had over 1500 ml of material removed. Eight-eight percent of the patients were female; 12 percent were male. Using the body-mass index, 3 percent of patients were underweight, 70 percent were normal weight, and 27 percent were overweight. Fifty-five patients (51 percent) had 1500 to 2499 ml of material removed, 26 patients (24 percent) had 2500 to 3499 ml removed, 16 patients (15 percent) had 3500 to 4499 ml removed, and 11 patients (10 percent) had over 4500 ml removed. All patients were treated in the hospital; 44 percent were admitted after surgery. A total of 227 units of autologous and 2 units of homologous blood were transfused. As measured by a computerized monitor, the average amount of blood in the material removed from thighs was 30 percent; from abdomens, the blood loss was 45 percent. The aesthetic results were generally excellent. No complications were encountered. A few patients developed undesired sequelae, the most common of which was seroma formation, which occurred in 19 percent of those who had suction of abdominal-wall fat. We believe that large-volume suction lipectomy is safe and efficacious, provided attention is directed to such important aspects of patient care as anesthesia, fluid replacement, and blood loss.     

The influence of permanent magnetic field therapy on wound healing in suction lipectomy patients: a double-blind study

The authors present their experience with the healing influence of permanent magnets on postoperative wounds. The responses of 20 patients who underwent suction lipectomy and postoperative negative magnetic field therapy were studied in a double-blind fashion. Magnets in the form of patches (10 patients) or sham magnet patches (10 patients) were placed over the operative region in each of the patients. Pain, edema, and discoloration (ecchymosis) were evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14 days postoperatively. Our results show that the treatment group had significant reductions in pain on postoperative days 1 through 7, in edema on days 1 through 4, and in discoloration on days 1 through 3 when compared with the control group. These results demonstrated that commercially available magnets have a positive influence on the postoperative healing process in suction lipectomy patients.     

Suction mammaplasty: the use of suction lipectomy to reduce large breasts

The use of suction lipectomy to reduce breast volume is described. The technique applies only to a very limited group of patients whose nipple-areola complexes are normally located and whose enlargement is primarily fibrofatty in nature. Suction mammaplasty can be used as a sole technique in congenital asymmetry or in post-reduction enlargement or asymmetry.     

Quantitative analysis of blood and fat in suction lipectomy aspirates

This study of suction lipectomy aspirates from 15 consecutive patients was undertaken to biochemically quantitate the blood-to-fat ratios of the aspirates. A wide variation in the blood-to-fat ratios (8 to 54 percent) was noted, but the authors failed to demonstrate any relationship between the blood-to-fat ratios and the suction lipectomy operative site. Prophylactic measures to allow treatment of patients in a consistently safe manner include carefully screening of patients to exclude those with bleeding disorders or significant illnesses, perioperative oral iron therapy, infiltrating the operation site with a dilute epinephrine solution, hydrating the patients adequately perioperatively, using smaller-diameter cannulas for the aspiration, minimizing aspiration once the aspirate turns grossly bloody, and limiting the aspirate to a volume of less than 1750 ml for any operative procedure.     

The effect of epinephrine on blood loss during suction lipectomy

In a prospective, double-blind, controlled study on 26 consecutive patients who underwent suction lipectomy, the injection of epinephrine (1:250,000, 1:500,000, or 1:1,000,000) was not found to decrease fluid/blood loss when compared with saline injection or no injection at all. Since our study fails to support the use of epinephrine to lessen fluid/blood loss during suction lipectomy, we have abandoned its use in that procedure.     

Wound complications after median sternotomy: A study of 61 patients from a consecutive series of 9,279

Among a consecutive series of 9,279 sternotomies performed during a period of 2(1/2) years, 61 (0.66%) patients developed significant wound complications. Of these, 58 (95.1%) survived. Sternal infection occurred in 36 patients (0.39%). Predisposing factors included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, obesity, closed chest massage, prolonged assisted ventilation, and excessive bleeding after operation. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) did not, in itself, predispose to sternal dehiscence. Intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) treatments caused excessive coughing, which may have increased the likelihood of dehiscence. Disposable drapes and expeditious surgery probably contributed to the low incidence of wound infection. Early diagnosis, surgical debridement, rewiring and primary closure with substernal drainage, without continuous antibiotic irrigation, resulted in satisfactory resolution in most patients.     

Rheumatic symptoms after cardiac surgery: a prospective study.

The incidence of different types of shoulder pain after open heart surgery was studied prospectively. Of 101 patients studied, 45 developed rheumatic symptoms during the first six weeks after the operation. Thirty eight patients reported pain in the region of the shoulder girdle with no loss of shoulder function (postpericardiotomy rheumatism). Three of these patients also had features compatible with the postpericardiotomy syndrome (fever, malaise, or pleuritic chest pain), and seven developed the syndrome without pain in the shoulder girdle. Of these 10 patients, one had generalised myalgia. Postpericardiotomy rheumatism alone was not associated with increased inflammation (measured by the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and concentration of C reactive protein); immunological tests including measurement of antibodies to cardiac muscle yielded inconclusive results. Replies to a postal questionnaire showed that symptoms of postpericardiotomy rheumatism were present for over three months in 18 patients and for six months or longer in 14. In view of the large number of patients now having open heart surgery postpericardiotomy rheumatism should be considered when patients report pain around the shoulders so that it is not misdiagnosed as angina.