A knowledge-based potential highlights unique features of membrane α-helical and β-barrel protein insertion and folding

Outer membrane β-barrel proteins differ from α-helical inner membrane proteins in lipid environment, secondary structure, and the proposed processes of folding and insertion. It is reasonable to expect that outer membrane proteins may contain primary sequence information specific for their folding and insertion behavior. In previous work, a depth-dependent insertion potential, E(z) , was derived for α-helical inner membrane proteins. We have generated an equivalent potential for TM β-barrel proteins. The similarities and differences between these two potentials provide insight into unique aspects of the folding and insertion of β-barrel membrane proteins. This potential can predict orientation within the membrane and identify functional residues involved in intermolecular interactions.     

Nature of the regions involved in the insertion of newly synthesized protein into the outer membrane of Escherichia coli.

Outer membrane proteins are synthesized by cytoplasmic membrane-bound polysomes, and inserted at insertion sites which cover about 10% of the total outer membrane when cells grow with a generation time of 1 h. A membrane fraction enriched in outer membrane insertion regions was isolated and partly characterized. The rat at which newly inserted proteins are transferred from such insertion regions into the rest of the outer membrane was found to be very fast; the new protein content of insertion regions and that of the remaining outer membrane equilibrate completely within about 20 s at 25 degrees C. Given the rather rigid structure of the outer membrane and the multiple interactions between outer membrane components and the murein layer, lateral diffusion of newly inserted proteins from insertion sites to the remaining outer membrane is not likely to explain this rapid equilibration. Instead, the data support a model in which insertion regions move along the cell surface, leaving behind stationary, newly inserted outer membrane proteins.     

Nature of the regions involved in the insertion of newly synthesized protein into the outer membrane of Escherichia coli

Outer membrane proteins are synthesized by cytoplasmic membrane-bound polysomes, and inserted at insertion sites which cover about 10% of the total outer membrane when cells grow with a generation time of 1 h. A membrane fraction enriched in outer membrane insertion regions was isolated and partly characterized. The rate at which newly inserted proteins are transferred from such insertion regions into the rest of the outer membrane was found to be very fast; the new protein content of insertion regions and that of the remaining outer membrane equilibrate completely within about 20 s at 25°C.Given the rather rigid structure of the outer membrane and the multiple interactions between outer membane components and the murein layer, lateral diffusion of newly inserted proteins from insertion sites to the remaining outer membrane is not likely to explain this rapid equilibration. Instead, the data support a model in which mobile insertion regions move along the cell surface, leaving behind stationary, newly inserted outer membrane proteins.     

YidC/Alb3/Oxa1 Family of Insertases

The YidC/Alb3/Oxa1 family functions in the insertion and folding of proteins in the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane, the chloroplast thylakoid membrane, and the mitochondrial inner membrane. All members share a conserved region composed of five transmembrane regions. These proteins mediate membrane insertion of an assorted group of proteins, ranging from respiratory subunits in the mitochondria and light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding proteins in chloroplasts to ATP synthase subunits in bacteria. This review discusses the YidC/Alb3/Oxa1 protein family as well as their function in membrane insertion and two new structures of the bacterial YidC, which suggest a mechanism for membrane insertion by this family of insertases.     

Oxa1p acts as a general membrane insertion machinery for proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA

Oxa1p is a member of the conserved Oxa1/YidC/Alb3 protein family involved in the membrane insertion of proteins. Oxa1p has been shown previously to directly facilitate the export of the N-terminal domains of membrane proteins across the inner membrane to the intermembrane space of mitochondria. Here we report on a general role of Oxa1p in the membrane insertion of proteins. (i) The function of Oxa1p is not limited to the insertion of membrane proteins that undergo N-terminal tail export; rather, it also extends to the insertion of other polytopic proteins such as the mitochondrially encoded Cox1p and Cox3p proteins. These are proteins whose N-termini are retained in the mitochondrial matrix. (ii) Oxa1p interacts directly with these substrates prior to completion of their synthesis. (iii) The interaction of Oxa1p with its substrates is particularly strong when nascent polypeptide chains are inserted into the inner membrane, suggesting a direct function of Oxa1p in co-translational insertion from the matrix. Taken together, we conclude that the Oxa1 complex represents a general membrane protein insertion machinery in the inner membrane of mitochondria.     

Mechanisms that determine the transmembrane disposition of proteins.

The final orientation that a protein assumes in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum is determined by a few types of signal sequences and their respective interactions with the membrane insertion complex. Membrane insertion occurs via a series of discrete steps, some of which are regulated by GTP- and ATP-binding proteins. Analysis of the protein components in proximity to nascent secretory and membrane proteins has revealed novel proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum that may form part of the membrane insertion complex.     

Tail-anchored and signal-anchored proteins utilize overlapping pathways during membrane insertion

Tail-anchored proteins are a distinct class of membrane proteins that are characterized by a C-terminal membrane insertion sequence and a capacity for post-translational integration. Although it is now clear that tail-anchored proteins are inserted into the membrane at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the molecular basis for their integration is poorly understood. We have used a cross-linking approach to identify ER components that may be involved in the membrane insertion of tail-anchored proteins. We find that several newly synthesized tail-anchored proteins are transiently associated with a defined subset of cellular components. Among these, we identify several ER proteins, including subunits of the Sec61 translocon, Sec62p, Sec63p, and the 25-kDa subunit of the signal peptidase complex. When we analyze the cotranslational membrane insertion of a comparable signal-anchored protein we find the nascent polypeptide associated with a similar set of ER components. We conclude that the pathways for the integration of tail-anchored and signal-anchored membrane proteins at the ER exhibit a substantial degree of overlap, and we propose that this reflects similarities between co- and post-translational membrane insertion.     

Insertion of bitopic membrane proteins into the inner membrane of mitochondria involves an export step from the matrix

The mitochondrial inner membrane contains a large number of polytopic proteins that are derived from prokaryotic ancestors of mitochondria. Little is known about the intramitochondrial sorting of these proteins. We chose two proteins of known topology as examples to study the pathway of insertion into the inner membrane; Mrs2 and Yta10 are bitopic proteins that expose negatively charged loops of different complexity into the intermembrane space. Here we show that both Mrs2 and Yta10 transiently accumulate as sorting intermediates in the matrix before they integrate into the inner membrane. The sorting pathway of both proteins can be separated into two sequential reactions: (i) import into the matrix and (ii) insertion from the matrix into the inner membrane. The latter process was found to depend on the membrane potential and, in this respect, is similar to the insertion of membrane proteins in bacteria. A comparison of the charge distribution of intermembrane space loops in a variety of mitochondrial inner membrane proteins suggests that this mode of "conservative sorting" might be the typical insertion route for polytopic inner membrane proteins that originated from bacterial ancestors.     

Insertion of OEP14 into the outer envelope membrane is mediated by proteinaceous components of chloroplasts

Most chloroplastic outer envelope membrane proteins are synthesized in the cytosol at their mature size without a cleavable targeting signal. Their insertion into the outer membrane is insensitive to thermolysin pretreatment of chloroplasts and does not require ATP. The insertion has been assumed to be mediated by a spontaneous mechanism or by interaction solely with the lipid components of the outer membrane. However, we show here that insertion of an outer membrane protein requires some trypsin-sensitive and some N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive components of chloroplasts. Association and insertion of the outer membrane protein are saturable and compete with the import of another outer membrane protein. These data suggest that import of chloroplastic outer membrane proteins occurs at specific proteinaceous sites on chloroplasts.     

The Alb3/Oxa1/YidC protein family: membrane-localized chaperones facilitating membrane protein insertion?

The recently identified Alb3/Oxa1/YidC family constitutes a novel class of proteins that function in promoting membrane insertion in chloroplasts, mitochondria and bacteria. These proteins mediate membrane insertion of a diverse group of membrane proteins that range from phage coat proteins in bacteria and respiratory-chain protein subunits in mitochondria to the light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding proteins in chloroplasts. Here, we discuss the Alb3/Oxa1/YidC protein family and their possible function as membrane chaperones, helping newly synthesized proteins to fold into the membrane bilayer.     

YidC,a newly defined evolutionarily conserved protein,mediates membrane protein assembly in bacteria

Membranes contain proteins that catalyze a variety of reactions, which lead to the selective permeability of the membrane. For membrane proteins to function as receptors, transporters, channels, and ATPases, they must be targeted to their correct membrane and inserted into the lipid bilayer. Recently, a new membrane component called YidC was discovered that mediates the insertion of proteins into membranes in bacteria. YidC homologs also exist in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Depletion of YidC from the cell interferes with the insertion of membrane proteins that insert both dependent and independent of the SecYEG/SecDFYajC machinery. YidC directly interacts with membrane proteins during the membrane protein insertion process and assists in the folding of the hydrophobic regions into the membrane bilayer. The chloroplast and bacterial YidC homologs are truly functional homologs because the chloroplast homolog Alb3 functionally complements the bacterial YidC depletion strain. The role of YidC in the membrane insertion pathway will be reviewed.     

Ribosome binding to the Oxa1 complex facilitates co-translational protein insertion in mitochondria

The Oxa1 translocase of the mitochondrial inner membrane facilitates the insertion of both mitochondrially and nuclear-encoded proteins from the matrix into the inner membrane. Most mitochondrially encoded proteins are hydrophobic membrane proteins which are integrated into the lipid bilayer during their synthesis on mitochondrial ribosomes. The molecular mechanism of this co-translational insertion process is unknown. Here we show that the matrix-exposed C-terminus of Oxa1 forms an alpha-helical domain that has the ability to bind to mitochondrial ribosomes. Deletion of this Oxa1 domain strongly diminished the efficiency of membrane insertion of subunit 2 of cytochrome oxidase, a mitochondrially encoded substrate of the Oxa1 translocase. This suggests that co-translational membrane insertion of mitochondrial translation products is facilitated by a physical interaction of translation complexes with the membrane-bound translocase.     

Insertion of plastidic β-barrel proteins into the outer envelopes of plastids involves an intermembrane space intermediate formed with Toc75-V/OEP80

The insertion of organellar membrane proteins with the correct topology requires the following: First, the proteins must contain topogenic signals for translocation across and insertion into the membrane. Second, proteinaceous complexes in the cytoplasm, membrane, and lumen of organelles are required to drive this process. Many complexes required for the intracellular distribution of membrane proteins have been described, but the signals and components required for the insertion of plastidic β-barrel-type proteins into the outer membrane are largely unknown. The discovery of common principles is difficult, as only a few plastidic β-barrel proteins exist. Here, we provide evidence that the plastidic outer envelope β-barrel proteins OEP21, OEP24, and OEP37 from pea (Pisum sativum) and Arabidopsis thaliana contain information defining the topology of the protein. The information required for the translocation of pea proteins across the outer envelope membrane is present within the six N-terminal β-strands. This process requires the action of translocon of the outer chloroplast (TOC) membrane. After translocation into the intermembrane space, β-barrel proteins interact with TOC75-V, as exemplified by OEP37 and P39, and are integrated into the membrane. The membrane insertion of plastidic β-barrel proteins is affected by mutation of the last β-strand, suggesting that this strand contributes to the insertion signal. These findings shed light on the elements and complexes involved in plastidic β-barrel protein import.

Plastidic β-barrel proteins contain sequence-intrinsic signals for translocation and membrane insertion, the latter of which involves a complex formation with TOC75-V prior to the final membrane insertion.     

Integration of membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum requires GTP

We have examined the requirement for ribonucleotides and ribonucleotide triphosphate hydrolysis during early events in the membrane integration of two membrane proteins: the G protein of vesicular stomatitis virus and the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) glycoprotein of Newcastle disease virus. Both proteins contain a single transmembrane-spanning segment but are integrated in the membrane with opposite orientations. The G protein has an amino-terminal signal sequence and a stop-transfer sequence located near the carboxy terminus. The HN glycoprotein has a single sequence near the amino terminus that functions as both a signal-sequence and a transmembrane-spanning segment. Membrane insertion was explored using a cell-free system directed by transcribed mRNAs encoding amino-terminal segments of the two proteins. Ribosome-bound nascent polypeptides were assembled, ribonucleotides were removed by gel filtration chromatography, and the ribosomes were incubated with microsomal membranes under conditions of defined ribonucleotide content. Nascent chain insertion into the membrane required the presence of both the signal recognition particle and a functional signal recognition particle receptor. In the absence of ribonucleotides, insertion of nascent membrane proteins was not detected. GTP or nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues promoted efficient insertion, while ATP was comparatively ineffective. Surprisingly, the majority of the HN nascent chain remained ribosome associated after puromycin treatment. Ribosome-associated HN nascent chains remained competent for membrane insertion, while free HN chains were not competent. We conclude that a GTP binding protein performs an essential function during ribosome-dependent insertion of membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum that is unrelated to protein synthesis.     

Identification of Bacillus subtilis YidC Substrates Using a MifM-instructed Translation Arrest-based Reporter

YidC is a member of the YidC/Oxa1/Alb3 protein family that is crucial for membrane protein biogenesis in the bacterial plasma membrane. While YidC facilitates the folding and complex assembly of membrane proteins along with the Sec translocon, it also functions as a Sec-independent membrane protein insertase in the YidC-only pathway. However, little is known about how membrane proteins are recognized and sorted by these pathways, especially in Gram-positive bacteria, for which only a small number of YidC substrates have been identified to date. In this study, we aimed to identify Bacillus subtilis membrane proteins whose membrane insertion depends on SpoIIIJ, the primary YidC homolog in B. subtilis. We took advantage of the translation arrest sequence of MifM, which can monitor YidC-dependent membrane insertion. Our systematic screening identified eight membrane proteins as candidate SpoIIIJ substrates. Results of our genetic study also suggest that the conserved arginine in the hydrophilic groove of SpoIIIJ is crucial for the membrane insertion of the substrates identified here. However, in contrast to MifM, a previously identified YidC substrate, the importance of the negatively charged residue on the substrates for membrane insertion varied depending on the substrate. These results suggest that B. subtilis YidC uses substrate-specific interactions to facilitate membrane insertion.     

Marginally hydrophobic transmembrane α‐helices shaping membrane protein folding

Cells have developed an incredible machinery to facilitate the insertion of membrane proteins into the membrane. While we have a fairly good understanding of the mechanism and determinants of membrane integration, more data is needed to understand the insertion of membrane proteins with more complex insertion and folding pathways. This review will focus on marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helices and their influence on membrane protein folding. These weakly hydrophobic transmembrane segments are by themselves not recognized by the translocon and therefore rely on local sequence context for membrane integration. How can such segments reside within the membrane? We will discuss this in the light of features found in the protein itself as well as the environment it resides in. Several characteristics in proteins have been described to influence the insertion of marginally hydrophobic helices. Additionally, the influence of biological membranes is significant. To begin with, the actual cost for having polar groups within the membrane may not be as high as expected; the presence of proteins in the membrane as well as characteristics of some amino acids may enable a transmembrane helix to harbor a charged residue. The lipid environment has also been shown to directly influence the topology as well as membrane boundaries of transmembrane helices—implying a dynamic relationship between membrane proteins and their environment.     

Membrane Topology and Insertion of Membrane Proteins: Search for Topogenic Signals

Integral membrane proteins are found in all cellular membranes and carry out many of the functions that are essential to life. The membrane-embedded domains of integral membrane proteins are structurally quite simple, allowing the use of various prediction methods and biochemical methods to obtain structural information about membrane proteins. A critical step in the biosynthetic pathway leading to the folded protein in the membrane is its insertion into the lipid bilayer. Understanding of the fundamentals of the insertion and folding processes will significantly improve the methods used to predict the three-dimensional membrane protein structure from the amino acid sequence. In the first part of this review, biochemical approaches to elucidate membrane protein topology are reviewed and evaluated, and in the second part, the use of similar techniques to study membrane protein insertion is discussed. The latter studies search for signals in the polypeptide chain that direct the insertion process. Knowledge of the topogenic signals in the nascent chain of a membrane protein is essential for the evaluation of membrane topology studies.     

Distinct Albino3-dependent and -independent pathways for thylakoid membrane protein insertion

The homologous proteins Oxa1, YidC, and Alb3 mediate the insertion of membrane proteins in mitochondria, bacteria, and chloroplast thylakoids, respectively. Depletion of YidC in Escherichia coli affects the integration of every membrane protein studied, and Alb3 has been shown previously to be required for the insertion of a signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent protein, Lhcb1, in thylakoids. In this study we have analyzed the "global" role of Alb3 in the insertion of thylakoid membrane proteins. We show that insertion of two chlorophyll-binding proteins, Lhcb4.1 and Lhcb5, is almost totally blocked by preincubation of thylakoids with anti-Alb3 antibodies, indicating a requirement for Alb3 in the insertion pathway. Insertion of the related PsbS protein, on the other hand, is unaffected by Alb3 antibodies, and insertion of a group of SRP-independent, signal peptide-bearing proteins, PsbX, PsbW, and PsbY, is likewise completely unaffected. Proteinase K is furthermore able to completely degrade Alb3, but this treatment does not affect the insertion of these proteins. Among the thylakoid proteins studied here, Alb3 requirement correlates strictly with a requirement for stromal factors and nucleoside triphosphates. However, the majority of proteins tested do not require Alb3 or any other known form of translocation apparatus.     

Sequence requirements for membrane assembly of polytopic membrane proteins: molecular dissection of the membrane insertion process and topogenesis of the human MDR3 P-glycoprotein.

The biogenesis of membrane proteins with a single transmembrane (TM) segment is well understood. However, understanding the biogenesis and membrane assembly of membrane proteins with multiple TM segments is still incomplete because of the complexity and diversity of polytopic membrane proteins. In an attempt to investigate further the biogenesis of polytopic membrane proteins, I used the human MDR3 P-glycoprotein (Pgp) as a model polytopic membrane protein and expressed it in a coupled cell-free translation/translocation system. I showed that the topogenesis of the C-terminal half MDR3 Pgp molecule is different from that of the N-terminal half. This observation is similar to that of the human MDR1 Pgp. The membrane insertion properties of the TM1 and TM2 in the N-terminal half molecule are different. The proper membrane anchorage of both TM1 and TM2 of the MDR3 Pgp is affected by their C-terminal amino acid sequences, whereas only the membrane insertion of the TM1 is dependent on the N-terminal amino acid sequences. The efficient membrane insertion of TM3 and TM5 of MDR3 Pgp, on the other hand, requires the presence of the putative TM4 and TM6, respectively. The TM8 in the C-terminal half does not contain an efficient stop-transfer activity. These observations suggest that the membrane insertion of putative TM segments in the human MDR3 Pgp does not simply follow the prevailing sequential event of the membrane insertion by signal-anchor and stop-transfer sequences. These results, together with my previous findings, suggest that different isoforms of Pgp can be used in comparison as a model system to understand the molecular mechanism of topogenesis of polytopic membrane proteins.     

Membrane topology and insertion of membrane proteins: search for topogenic signals.

Integral membrane proteins are found in all cellular membranes and carry out many of the functions that are essential to life. The membrane-embedded domains of integral membrane proteins are structurally quite simple, allowing the use of various prediction methods and biochemical methods to obtain structural information about membrane proteins. A critical step in the biosynthetic pathway leading to the folded protein in the membrane is its insertion into the lipid bilayer. Understanding of the fundamentals of the insertion and folding processes will significantly improve the methods used to predict the three-dimensional membrane protein structure from the amino acid sequence. In the first part of this review, biochemical approaches to elucidate membrane protein topology are reviewed and evaluated, and in the second part, the use of similar techniques to study membrane protein insertion is discussed. The latter studies search for signals in the polypeptide chain that direct the insertion process. Knowledge of the topogenic signals in the nascent chain of a membrane protein is essential for the evaluation of membrane topology studies.