TCR affinity for self-ligands influences the development and function of encephalitogenic T cells

The specificity and affinity of self-reactive T cells is likely to impact the development of autoimmune-disease causing T cells in the thymus as well as their function in the periphery. We identified a naturally occurring, low affinity variant of an MBP Ac1-11/I-A(u) specific TCR that is known to induce EAE. Thymocytes in mice carrying the transgenes for this low affinity TCR were poorly positively selected, as compared to their high affinity TCR expressing counterparts. Nonetheless, CD4 T cells bearing the low affinity TCR accumulated in the periphery of the mice. Unlike mice expressing the high affinity TCR, these mice very rarely developed disease. However, if endogenous TCR expression was eliminated by breeding to RAG1 deficient mice, 100% of the mice carrying either the high or the low affinity versions of the TCR developed EAE. Intriguingly, while the incidence of EAE increased, the age of onset of disease in both mice was identical. These data suggest disease onset occurs during a short window of mouse development.     

Synthetic peptides representing sequence 39 to 59 of rat V beta 8 TCR fail to elicit regulatory T cells reactive with V beta 8 TCR on rat encephalitogenic T cells.

Subpathogenic doses of syngeneic autoreactive T cells protect experimental animals against associated autoimmune disease. Preferential use of the TCR of encephalitogenic T cells suggests that this molecule serves as the target for immunoregulation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Whether peptides derived from the V beta 8 of the rat TCR elicit regulatory T cells and produce the same vaccinating effect against EAE as do whole T cells remains unknown. Here we show that immunization of Lewis rats with V beta 8(39-59), a peptide representing residues 39 to 59 of the rat V beta 8 TCR, does not induce the production of regulatory T cells reactive to the intact TCR V beta 8 containing this sequence. Moreover, animals that had recovered from both actively induced EAE and transferred EAE did not generate regulatory T cells that recognized the V beta 8(39-59) peptide. Further, transfusion of large doses of peptide-specific T cells did not protect the animals from EAE. Our results suggest that the V beta 8(39-59) peptide may comprise so-called cryptic epitopes, which function as immunogens only when dissociated from large protein complexes.     

Neuron-mediated generation of regulatory T cells from encephalitogenic T cells suppresses EAE

Neurons have been neglected as cells with a major immune-regulatory function because they do not express major histocompatibility complex class II. Our data show that neurons are highly immune regulatory, having a crucial role in governing T-cell response and central nervous system (CNS) inflammation. Neurons induce the proliferation of activated CD4+ T cells through B7-CD28 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1-TGF-beta receptor signaling pathways, resulting in amplification of T-cell receptor signaling through phosphorylated ZAP-70, interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-9. The interaction between neurons and T cells results in the conversion of encephalitogenic T cells to CD25+ TGF-beta1+ CTLA-4+ FoxP3+ T regulatory (Treg) cells that suppress encephalitogenic T cells and inhibit experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Suppression is dependent on cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 but not TGF-beta1. Autocrine action of TGF-beta1, however, is important for the proliferative arrest of Treg cells. Blocking the B7 and TGF-beta pathways prevents the CNS-specific generation of Treg cells. These findings show that generation of neuron-dependent Treg cells in the CNS is instrumental in regulating CNS inflammation.     

Immunotherapy with ligands of natural killer T cells

Natural killer T (NKT) cells are innate lymphocytes that share receptor structures and functions with conventional T cells and natural killer cells. NKT cells are specific for glycolipid antigens bound by the major histocompatibility complex class I-like protein CD1d. One striking property of NKT cells is their capacity to rapidly produce large amounts of cytokines in response to T-cell receptor engagement, suggesting that activated NKT cells can modulate adaptive immune responses. Recent pre-clinical studies have revealed significant efficacy of NKT-cell ligands such as the glycolipid alpha-galactosylceramide for treatment of metastatic cancers and infections, and for prevention of autoimmune diseases. These findings suggest that appropriate stimulation of NKT cells could be exploited for prevention or treatment of human diseases.     

Regulation of T cell activation by TLR ligands

Regulatory T cells (Treg) maintain peripheral tolerance and play a critical role in the control of the immune response in infection, tumor defense, organ transplantation and allergy. CD4(+)CD25(high) Treg suppress the proliferation and cytokine production of CD4(+)CD25(-) responder T cells. The suppression requires cell-cell-contact and/or production of inhibitory cytokines like IL-10 or TGF-β. The current knowledge about the regulation of Treg suppressive function is limited. Toll-like receptors (TLR) are widely expressed in the innate immune system. They recognize conserved microbial ligands such as lipopolysaccharide, bacterial lipopeptides or viral and bacterial RNA and DNA. TLR play an essential role in innate immune responses and in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. However, certain TLR are also expressed in T lymphocytes, and the respective ligands can directly modulate T cell function. TLR2, TLR3, TLR5 and TLR9 act as costimulatory receptors to enhance proliferation and/or cytokine production of T-cell receptor-stimulated T lymphocytes. In addition, TLR2, TLR5 and TLR8 modulate the suppressive activity of naturally occurring CD4(+)CD25(high) Treg. The direct responsiveness of T lymphocytes to TLR ligands offers new perspectives for the immunotherapeutic manipulation of T cell responses. In this article we will discuss the regulation of Treg and other T cell subsets by TLR ligands.     

MHC variant peptide-mediated anergy of encephalitogenic T cells requires SHP-1

Our lab has demonstrated that encephalitogenic T cells can be effectively anergized by treatment with MHC variant peptides, which are analogues of immunogenic peptides containing an amino acid substitution at an MHC anchor residue. The MHC variant peptide of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)(35-55) proves an effective treatment as it does not induce symptoms of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and fails to recruit macrophages or MOG(35-55)-specific T cells to the CNS. In this study, we sought to characterize the signaling pathways required for the induction of anergy by building upon the observations identifying the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 as a critical regulator of T cell responsiveness. Motheaten viable heterozygous mice, which contain a mutation in the SHP-1 gene resulting in a reduction in functional SHP-1, were challenged with MOG(35-55) or the MOG(35-55) MHC variant 45D. These mice display symptoms of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis upon immunization with MHC variant peptide and have significant CNS infiltration of tetramer-positive CD4(+) cells and macrophages, unlike B6 mice challenged with the variant peptide. The effects of SHP-1 are directly on the T cell as Motheaten viable heterozygous mice autoreactive T cells are not anergized in vitro. Lastly, we demonstrate no distinguishable difference in the initial interaction between the TCR and agonist or MHC variant. Rather, an unstable interaction between peptide and MHC attenuates the T cell response, seen in a decreased half-life relative to MOG(35-55). These results identify SHP-1 as a mediator of T cell anergy induced by destabilized peptide:MHC complexes.     

Regulation of diabetes development by regulatory T cells in pancreatic islet antigen-specific TCR transgenic nonobese diabetic mice

Nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice carrying a transgenic TCR from an islet Ag-specific CD4 T cell clone, BDC2.5, do not develop diabetes. In contrast, the same transgenic NOD mice on the SCID background develop diabetes within 4 wk after birth. Using a newly developed mAb specific for the BDC2.5 TCR, we examined the interaction between diabetogenic T cells and regulatory T cells in NOD.BDC transgenic mice. CD4 T cells from NOD.BDC mice, expressing high levels of the clonotype, transfer diabetes to NOD.SCID recipients. In contrast, CD4 T cells expressing low levels due to the expression of both transgenic and endogenous TCR alpha-chains inhibit diabetes transfer. The clonotype-low CD4 T cells appear late in the ontogeny in the thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs, coinciding with resistance to cyclophosphamide-induced diabetes. These results demonstrate that diabetic processes in NOD.BDC mice are regulated by a balance between diabetogenic T cells and regulatory T cells. In the absence of specific manipulation, regulatory T cell function seems to be dominant and mice remain diabetes free. Understanding of mechanisms by which regulatory T cells inhibit diabetogenic processes would provide means to prevent diabetes development in high-risk human populations.     

Distinct footprints of TCR engagement with highly homologous ligands

T cell receptor engagement promotes proliferation, differentiation, survival, or death of T lymphocytes. The affinity/avidity of the TCR ligand and the maturational stage of the T cell are thought to be principal determinants of the outcome of TCR engagement. We demonstrate in this study that the same mouse TCR preferentially uses distinct residues of homologous peptides presented by the MHC molecules to promote specific cellular responses. The preference for distinct TCR contacts depends on neither the affinity/avidity of TCR engagement (except in the most extreme ranges), nor the maturity of engaged T cells. Thus, different portions of the TCR ligand appear capable of biasing T cells toward specific biological responses. These findings explain differences in functional versatility of TCR ligands, as well as anomalies in the relationship between affinity/avidity of the TCR for the peptide/MHC and cellular responses of T cells.     

Strong TCR signaling, TLR ligands, and cytokine redundancies ensure robust development of type 1 effector T cells

T cell effector function is a central mechanism of adaptive immunity, and accordingly, protection of the host against pathogens. One of the primary effector molecules produced by T cells in response to such pathogens is the cytokine, IFN-gamma. Although the signaling pathways associated with the production of IFN-gamma are well established, disparate in vivo and in vitro results indicate that distinct pathways may become more prominent dependent upon the nature of the infection, inflammatory milieu and tissue localization. We have examined the roles and requirements of the major IFN-gamma-inducing pathways in vivo and in vitro, specifically: strength of TCR signal; paracrine release of IL-12, IL-23, and IL-18; and autocrine production of IFN-gamma. Our data show a dynamic interaction between these activation pathways, which allows the host a degree of flexibility and redundancy in the induction of IFN-gamma. Upon strong signaling through the TCR, IL-12, IL-18, and IL-23 play negligible roles in the induction of IFN-gamma, whereas autocrine IFN-gamma is an important component in sustaining its own secretion. However, the absence of any one of these factors during a weaker TCR signal, results in strikingly impaired T cell IFN-gamma production. Of note, TLR-activated dendritic cells (DCs) were capable of overcoming the absence of a strong TCR signal, IL-12, IL-23, or IL-18 revealing an important additional mechanism for ensuring a robust IFN-gamma response. Our findings clarify the hierarchical requirements of the major IFN-gamma inducing pathways and highlight the important role TLR ligand-activated DCs have to preserve them.     

Comparison of a T cell clone and of T cells from a TCR transgenic mouse: TCR transgenic T cells specific for self-antigen are atypical

It has been widely assumed that T cells from TCR-transgenic (Tg) mice better represent the behavior of T cells from normal mice than do in vitro cultures of T cell clones. We have found that autoreactive T cells arising in the presumably more physiological environment of the BDC-2.5 TCR-Tg mouse, despite being apparently "naive" in surface phenotype, are highly activated functionally and do not resemble CD4(+) T cells from a spontaneously diabetic nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse or the NOD-derived, diabetogenic CD4(+) T cell clone of origin, BDC-2.5. Our results suggest that autoreactive T cells cloned from the spontaneously diabetic NOD mouse more closely resemble effector T cells arising during the natural disease process.     

Anergy induction by dimeric TCR ligands

T cells that recognize particular self Ags are thought to be important in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. In multiple sclerosis, susceptibility is associated with HLA-DR2, which can present myelin-derived peptides to CD4(+) T cells. To generate molecules that target such T cells based on the specificity of their TCR, we expressed a soluble dimeric DR2-IgG fusion protein with a bound peptide from myelin basic protein (MBP). Soluble, dimeric DR2/MBP peptide complexes activated MBP-specific T cells in the absence of signals from costimulatory or adhesion molecules. This initial signaling through the TCR rendered the T cells unresponsive (anergic) to subsequent activation by peptide-pulsed APCs. Fluorescent labeling demonstrated that anergic T cells were initially viable, but became susceptible to late apoptosis due to insufficient production of cytokines. Dimerization of the TCR with bivalent MHC class II/peptide complexes therefore allows the induction of anergy in human CD4(+) T cells with a defined MHC/peptide specificity.     

TCR revision generates functional CD4+ T cells

CD4(+)Vβ5(+) peripheral T cells in C57BL/6 mice respond to encounter with a peripherally expressed endogenous superantigen by undergoing either deletion or TCR revision. In this latter process, cells lose surface Vβ5 expression and undergo RAG-dependent rearrangement of endogenous TCRβ genes, driving surface expression of novel TCRs. Although postrevision CD4(+)Vβ5(-)TCRβ(+) T cells accumulate with age in Vβ5 transgenic mice and bear a diverse TCR Vβ repertoire, it is unknown whether they respond to homeostatic and antigenic stimuli and thus may benefit the host. We demonstrate in this study that postrevision cells are functional. These cells have a high rate of steady-state homeostatic proliferation in situ, and they undergo extensive MHC class II-dependent lymphopenia-induced proliferation. Importantly, postrevision cells do not proliferate in response to the tolerizing superantigen, implicating TCR revision as a mechanism of tolerance induction and demonstrating that TCR-dependent activation of postrevision cells is not driven by the transgene-encoded receptor. Postrevision cells proliferate extensively to commensal bacterial Ags and can generate I-A(b)-restricted responses to Ag by producing IFN-γ following Listeria monocytogenes challenge. These data show that rescued postrevision T cells are responsive to homeostatic signals and recognize self- and foreign peptides in the context of self-MHC and are thus useful to the host.     

Leptospira interrogans activation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: preferential expansion of TCR gamma delta+ T cells vs TCR alpha beta+ T cells

Innate and adaptive immune responses induced by leptospirosis have not been well characterized. In this study we show that in vitro exposure of naive human PBMC to Leptospira interrogans results in cell proliferation and the production of IFN-gamma, IL-12, and TNF-alpha. Cell proliferation was highest when using high numbers of Leptospira. Optimal cell proliferation occurred at 6-8 days, and the majority of cells contained in these cultures were gamma/delta T cells. These cultures showed a 10- to 50-fold expansion of gamma/delta T cells compared with the initial cellular input. Additionally, these cultures contained elevated numbers of NK cells. In contrast, exposure of PBMC to low numbers of Leptospira failed to induce gammadelta T cell or NK cell expansion, but induced significant alphabeta T cell expansion. Vgamma9/Vdelta2 were expressed on all gamma/delta T cells expanded by exposure of PBMC to Leptorspira: Leptospira stimulation of purified TCRgammadelta(+) T cells, obtained from 8-day cultures of Leptospira-stimulated PBMC, induced high levels of IFN-gamma production, but no cell proliferation, suggesting that such stimulation of gammadelta T cells did not depend on specialized accessory cells or Ag processing. Finally, in patients with acute leptospirosis, there was a significant (4- to 5-fold) increase in the number of peripheral blood TCRgammadelta(+) T cells. These results indicate that Leptospira can activate gammadelta T cells and alphabeta T cells and will guide further investigations into the roles of these T cell populations in host defense and/or the pathology of leptospirosis.     

Requirements for effective antitumor responses of TCR transduced T cells

Adoptive transfer of TCR gene-modified T cells has been proposed as an attractive approach to target tumors for which it is difficult or impossible to induce strong tumor-specific T cell responses by vaccination. Whereas the feasibility of generating tumor Ag-specific T cells by gene transfer has been demonstrated, the factors that determine the in vivo effectiveness of TCR-modified T cells are largely unknown. We have analyzed the value of a number of clinically feasible strategies to enhance the antitumor potential of TCR modified T cells. These experiments reveal three factors that contribute greatly to the in vivo potency of TCR-modified T cells. First, irradiation-induced host conditioning is superior to vaccine-induced activation of genetically modified T cells. Second, increasing TCR expression through genetic optimization of TCR sequences has a profound effect on in vivo antitumor activity. Third, a high precursor frequency of TCR modified T cells within the graft is essential. Tumors that ultimately progress in animals treated with this optimized regimen for TCR-based adoptive cell transfer invariably display a reduced expression of the target Ag. This suggests TCR gene therapy can achieve a sufficiently strong selective pressure to warrant the simultaneous targeting of multiple Ags. The strategies outlined in this study should be of value to enhance the antitumor activity of TCR-modified T cells in clinical trials.     

TCR reserve: a novel principle of CD4 T cell activation by weak ligands

Some ligand-receptor systems have a receptor reserve where a maximal response can be achieved by occupation of a fraction of available receptors. An implication of a receptor reserve is the expansion of the number of ligands for response. To determine whether T cells follow receptor reserve, we have characterized the effect of reducing TCR levels on CD4 T cell responses elicited by altered peptide ligands that vary in potency. Agonist peptide is unaffected by a 90% reduction in TCR level while proliferation to weak agonists is significantly inhibited when TCR expression is reduced by 40%. Thymocyte-negative selection similarly demonstrates a differential requirement of TCR for response to agonist, weak agonist, and partial agonist. Therefore, our data demonstrate receptor reserve as a novel principle of T cell activation in which excess TCRs expand the antigenic repertoire to include less potent ligands.     

CD1d-specific NK1.1+ T cells with a transgenic variant TCR

The majority of T lymphocytes carrying the NK cell marker NK1.1 (NKT cells) depend on the CD1d molecule for their development and are distinguished by their potent capacity to rapidly secrete cytokines upon activation. A substantial fraction of NKT cells express a restricted TCR repertiore using an invariant TCR Valpha14-Jalpha281 rearrangement and a limited set of TCR Vbeta segments, implying recognition of a limited set of CD1d-associated ligands. A second group of CD1d-reactive T cells use diverse TCR potentially recognizing a larger diversity of ligands presented on CD1d. In TCR-transgenic mice carrying rearranged TCR genes from a CD1d-reactive T cell with the diverse type receptor (using Valpha3. 2/Vbeta9 rearrangements), the majority of T cells expressing the transgenic TCR had the typical phenotype of NKT cells. They expressed NK1.1, CD122, intermediate TCR levels, and markers indicating previous activation and were CD4/CD8 double negative or CD4+. Upon activation in vitro, the cells secreted large amounts of IL-4 and IFN-gamma, a characteristic of NKT cells. In mice lacking CD1d, TCR-transgenic cells with the NKT phenotype were absent. This demonstrates that a CD1d-reactive TCR of the "non-Valpha 14" diverse type can, in a ligand-dependent way, direct development of NK1.1+ T cells expressing expected functional and cell-surface phenotype characteristics.     

TCR signal transduction in antigen-specific memory CD8 T cells

Memory T cells are more responsive to Ag than naive cells. To determine whether memory T cells also have more efficient TCR signaling, we compared naive, effector, and memory CD8 T cells of the same antigenic specificity. Surprisingly, initial CD3 signaling events are indistinguishable. However, memory T cells have more extensive lipid rafts with higher phosphoprotein content before TCR engagement. Upon activation in vivo, they more efficiently induce phosphorylation of-LAT (linker for activation of T cells), ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase), JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase), and p38. Thus, memory CD8 T cells do not increase their TCR sensitivity, but are better poised to augment downstream signals. We propose that this regulatory mechanism might increase signal transduction in memory T cells, while limiting TCR cross-reactivity and autoimmunity.     

TCR complex-activated CD8 adhesion function by human T cells

The CD8 receptor plays a central role in the recognition and elimination of virally infected and malignant cells by cytolytic CD8(+) T cells. In conjunction with the TCR, the CD8 coreceptor binds Ag-specific class I MHC (MHC-I) molecules expressed by target cells, initiating signaling events that result in T cell activation. Whether CD8 can further function as an adhesion molecule for non-Ag MHC-I is currently unclear in humans. In this study, we show that in human CD8(+) T cells, TCR complex signaling activates CD8 adhesion molecule function, resulting in a CD8 interaction with MHC-I that is sufficient to maintain firm T cell adhesion under shear conditions. Secondly, we found that while CD8 adhesive function was triggered by TCR complex activation in differentiated cells, including in vitro generated CTL and ex vivo effector/memory phenotype CD8(+) T cells, naive CD8(+) T cells were incapable of activated CD8 adhesion. Lastly, we examine the kinetics of, and signaling for, activated CD8 adhesion in humans and identify notable differences from the equivalent CD8 function in mouse. Activated CD8 adhesion induced by TCR signaling may contribute to the more rapid and robust elimination of pathogen-infected cells by differentiated CD8(+) T cells.     

Study of the mechanism of TCR antagonism using dual-TCR-expressing T cells

The mechanism of action of TCR antagonists is incompletely understood. T cells expressing two distinct TCRs have been used to test competition for TCR occupancy as a potential mechanism. Previous studies with CD4 T cells showed that an antagonist for one TCR inhibited the response to the other TCR (cross-antagonism), whereas studies with CD8 cells failed to demonstrate cross-antagonism. To determine whether CD4 and CD8 cells were intrinsically different or whether the differences were the result of the use of different effector assays, we studied both CD4 and CD8 dual-TCR-expressing T cells. In the CD4 system, consistent with previous reports, cross-antagonism of proliferation was observed. In the CD8 system, cross-antagonism was observed using proliferation as readout but not when target cell cytolysis was used. These results suggest that different mechanisms may be involved in the inhibition of proliferation and inhibition of cytotoxic effector function, the latter only involving competition for TCR occupancy. Inhibition of proliferation appears to be more complex and other mechanisms such as sequestration of signaling molecules or negative signaling may be involved. The fact that 10- to 20-fold more antagonist was needed to achieve cross-antagonism compared with inhibition of the cognate TCR is consistent with the hypothesis that competition for TCR occupancy is also a major, albeit not sole, mechanism of antagonism of the proliferative responses of CD4 and CD8 cells.