Effects of predator behavior and proximity on risk assessment by Columbian black-tailed deer

In predator-prey encounters, many factors influence risk perceptionby prey and their decision to flee. Previous studies indicatethat prey take flight at longer distances when they detect predatorsat longer distances and when the predator's behavior indicatesthe increased likelihood of attack. We examined the flight decisionsof Columbian black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus)using an approaching human whose speed, directness of approach,directness of gaze, and simulated gun carrying varied. Deerfled at greater distances when approached more quickly and directly,and there was a concave-down quadratic trend in the relationshipbetween the distances at which the predator began its approachand at which the deer became alert (alert distance [AD]), indicatingthat deer have a zone of awareness beyond which there is a delayin detecting an approaching predator. Time spent assessing theapproacher (assessment time) was shorter during faster approachesand was positively related with AD. Deer fled at longer distancesand had shorter assessment times when they were already alertto the predator at the initiation of approach. Males fled atshorter distances than females when approached during the gun-holdingcondition, and males had shorter assessment times than femaleswhen the approacher averted his gaze. Such sex differences inrisk assessment might reflect male motivation during the matingseason as well as exposure to human hunting. We suggest thatrisk assessment is affected the by the predator's behavior,the state of awareness of the prey, and the distance at whichthey detect the predator.     

Detection and Avoidance of Predators in White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and Mule Deer (O. hemionus)

In this paper, we investigate the relationship between early detection of predators and predator avoidance in white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) and mule deer ( O. hemionus ), two closely related species that differ in their habitat preferences and in their anti-predator behavior. We used observations of coyotes ( Canis latrans ) hunting deer to test whether the distance at which white-tails and mule deer alerted to coyotes was related to their vulnerability to predation. Coyote encounters with both species were more likely to escalate when deer alerted at shorter distances. However, coyote encounters with mule deer progressed further than encounters with white-tails that alerted at the same distance, and this was not due to species differences in group size or habitat. We then conducted an experiment in which a person approached groups of deer to compare the detection abilities and the form of alert response for white-tails and mule deer, and for age groups within each species. Mule deer alerted to the approacher at longer distances than white-tails, even after controlling for variables that were potentially confounding. Adult females of both species alerted sooner than conspecific juveniles. Mule deer almost always looked directly at the approacher as their initial response, whereas white-tails were more likely to flee or to look in another direction with no indication that they pinpointed the approacher during the trial. Mule deer may have evolved the ability to detect predators earlier than white-tails as an adaptation to their more open habitats, or because they need more time to coordinate subsequent anti-predator defenses.     

The ontogeny of escape behavior,locomotor performance,and the hind limb in Sceloporus woodi

Flight initiation distance describes the distance at which an animal flees during the approach of a predator. This distance presumably reflects the tradeoff between the benefits of fleeing versus the benefits of remaining stationary. Throughout ontogeny, the costs and benefits of flight may change substantially due to growth-related changes in sprint speed; thus ontogenetic variation in flight initiation distance may be substantial. If escape velocity is essential for surviving predator encounters, then juveniles should either tolerate short flight initiation distances and rely on crypsis, or should have high flight initiation distances to remain far away from their predators. We examined this hypothesis in a small, short-lived lizard (Sceloporus woodi). Flight initiation distance and escape velocity were recorded on an ontogenetic series of lizards in the field. Maximal running velocity was also quantified in a laboratory raceway to establish if escape velocities in the field compared with maximal velocities as measured in the lab. Finally a subset of individuals was used to quantify how muscle and limb size scale with body size throughout ontogeny. Flight initiation distance increased with body size; larger animals had higher flight initiation distances. Small lizards had short flight initiation distances and remained immobile longer, thus relying on crypsis for concealment. Escape velocity in the field did not vary with body size, yet maximum velocity in the lab did increase with size. Hind limb morphology scaled isometrically with body size. Isometric scaling of the hind limb elements and its musculature, coupled with similarities in sprint and escape velocity across ontogeny, demonstrate that smaller S. woodi must rely on crypsis to avoid predator encounters, whereas adults alter their behavior via larger flight initiation distance and lower (presumably less expensive) escape velocities.     

Effects of risk, cost, and their interaction on optimal escape by nonrefuging Bonaire whiptail lizards, Cnemidophorus murinus

Optimal escape theory seeks to explain variation in the distanceto an approaching predator at which the prey initiates escape(flight initiation distance). Flight initiation distance increaseswhen predators pose a greater threat and decreases when escapecosts increase. Although optimal escape theory has been highlysuccessful, its predictions have been tested primarily for speciesthat escape to discrete refuges, and most studies have focusedon single risk or cost factors. We present data from two experimentsin which two risks or a risk and a cost varied in Bonaire whiptaillizards (Cnemidophorus murinus) that escaped without enteringrefuges. Our data verify several predictions about optimal escapefor nonrefuging lizard prey. Two risk factors, speed and directnessof approach by the predator, interacted. Directly approachedlizards had greater flight initiation distances than did indirectlyapproached lizards when approached rapidly, but shorter flightinitiation distances when approached slowly. Flight initiationdistance was shorter in the presence of food and during slowversus rapid approaches, but contrary to expectation, food presenceand approach speed did not interact. This would be explainedif cost curves are nonlinear or if they are parallel ratherthan intersecting when the predator reaches the prey. More empiricalwork is needed to determine which risk and cost factors actadditively and which act synergistically. The absence of interactionbetween the risk and cost factors suggests that cost curveswere nonlinear.     

The influence of distance to burrow on flight initiation distance in the woodchuck, Marmota monax

We used woodchucks (Marmota monax) to test predictions of acost-benefit model of antipredator behavior that flight initiationdistance would increase with distance to refuge and with predatorapproach velocity. We also examined the effects of distanceto refuge and predator approach velocity on escape velocityand on both temporal and spatial margin of safety (expectedtime and distance between predator and burrow at the time ofthe woodchuck's arrival). The observer, assumed to be perceivedas a potential predator, approached juvenile woodchucks fromthe direction opposite to the burrow at a slow (1.24 m/s) orfast (1.79 m/s) walking pace. When the woodchuck started toflee, the observer recorded the woodchuck's distance from theobserver and from its burrow, the time spent running, and whetherthe woodchuck stopped before reaching its burrow. Flight initiationdistance increased consistendy with distance to the burrow overthe entire observed range (0–25 m) but was not significantlyaffected by observer approach velocity. Escape velocity wasnot significantly influenced by the observer approach velocityand was approximately constant over the range of 2–25m, but was slower for woodchucks less than 2 m from their burrows.Both temporal and spatial margins of safety increased with distancefrom the burrow. The temporal margin of safety increased withdistance from the burrow more rapidly for slow than for fastobserver approach velocity. Woodchucks fleeing from greaterthan 2 m usually stopped near the burrow before entering, butthose from closer distances usually entered directly. Theseresults support the assumption that antipredator behavior issensitive to the costs and benefits of alternative escape decisions.     

Distance-to-cover and the escape decisions of an African cichlid fish,Melanochromis chipokae

Synopsis The risk to a prey individual in an encounter with a predator increases as the distance to protective cover increases. Prey should therefore initiate their flight to cover at longer distances from an approaching predator (i.e., sooner) and/or flee at greater velocities, as the distance to cover increases. These predictions were tested with an African cichlid fish, Melanochromis chipokae presented with a looming stimulus simulating an attacking predator. The fish varied their flight initiation distance as predicted, but there was no significant effect of distance-to-cover on escape velocity. Nevertheless, the cichlids appeared to choose a combination of flight initiation distance and escape velocity which ensured they reached cover with a constant temporal margin of safety.     

Choosing among alternative refuges: Distances and directions

Many prey flee to refuges to escape from approaching predators, but little is known about how they select one among many refuges available. The problem of choice among alternative refuges has not been modeled previously, but a recent model that predicts flight initiation distance (FID = predator–prey distance when escape starts) for a prey fleeing to a refuge provides a basis for predicting which refuge should be chosen. Because fleeing is costly, prey should choose to flee to the refuge permitting the shortest FID. The model predicts that the more distant of two refuges can be favored if it is not too far and if the prey's trajectory to the farther refuge is more away from the predator than the direction to the nearer refuge. The difference in predicted FID between the farther and nearer refuges increases curvilinearly as the interpath angle for the farther refuge increases. The difference in predicted FID between the farther and nearer refuges increases linearly as the distance to the farther refuge increases. An isocline describing where nearer and farther refuges are equally favored shows a negative curvilinear relationship between interpath angle and prey distance to the farther refuge. In the region below the isocline, the farther refuge is favored, whereas above the isocline the prey should flee to the nearer refuge.     

Flight initiation distance and escape behavior in the black redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros)

There are many anti‐predatory escape strategies in animals. A well‐established method to assess escape behavior is the flight initiation distance (FID), which is the distance between prey and predator at which an animal flees. Previous studies in various species throughout the animal kingdom have shown that group size, urbanization, and distance to refuge and body mass affect FID. In most species, FID increases if body mass, group size or distance to refuge decreases. However, how age and sexual dimorphism affect FID is rather unknown. Here, we assess the escape behavior and FID of the black redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros), a small turdid passerine. When approached by a human, males initiated flights later, that is allowing a closer approach than females. Males of this species are more conspicuous, and therefore, may exhibit aposematism to deter potential predators or are less fearful than females. Additionally, juveniles fled at shorter distances and fled to lower heights than adults. Lastly, concerning escape strategy, black redstarts, unless other passerine birds, fled less often into cover, but rather onto open or elevated spots. Black redstarts are especially prone to predation by ambushing predators that might hide in cover. Hence, this species most likely has a higher chance of escaping by fleeing to an open spot rather than to a potentially risky cover.     

Sex and social costs of escaping in the striped plateau lizard Sceloporus virgatus

As a predator approaches, prey base decisions about when toflee on a balance between degree of predation risk and costsof escaping. Lost opportunities to perform activities that mayincrease fitness are major escape costs. Paramount among theseare chances to increase fitness by courting and mating and bydriving away sexual rivals. Because sexual selection imposesdifferent social demands on the sexes, social opportunitiescan have different consequences for males and females, but effectsof sex differences in social opportunity costs on escape behaviorare unknown. We conducted a field experiment showing that malestriped plateau lizards (Sceloporus virgatus) given the opportunityto court or perform aggressive behavior permit closer approachbefore fleeing, but females do not. Males allowed a simulatedpredator to approach closer before initiating escape if a tetheredmale or female rather than a control stimulus was introducedto them, but females initiated escape at similar distances inall conditions. For males, a trade-off between the greater predationrisk accepted before fleeing due to the likelihood of enhancingfitness by sexual or aggressive behavior accounts for closerapproach allowed in the presence of conspecifics. Mating opportunitiesare not limiting for females in most species and females oftenhave little to gain by interacting aggressively with other females.Therefore, presence of a conspecific male or female may notjustify taking greater risk. Results confirm the predictionof optimal escape theory that flight initiation decreases ascost of escaping increases. The sex difference in effect ofpresence of conspecifics on flight initiation distance is aconsequence of the sex difference in costs of escaping.     

Determinants of sexual differences in escape behavior in lizards of the genus Anolis: a comparative approach

Males and females are known to differ in a whole suite of characteristics,such as morphology, physiology, ecology, and behavior. Intersexualdifferences are generally believed to arise because of differencesin selective pressures on either sex. In this study, we investigatedwhether intersexual differences in escape behavior exist inlizards of the genus Anolis, and whether these could be explainedby intersexual differences in body size and/or microhabitatuse. To do so, we compared the behavioral response to an approachinghuman predator in the field in males and females of 12 Anolisspecies. We found that ecomorphs and sexes differ greatly withrespect to escape behavior. Twig anoles have the shortest approachdistance (i.e., distance between the observer and the lizardwhen it starts fleeing) and final distance (i.e., distance betweenthe observer and the lizard when it stops moving), comparedwith the other ecomorphs. The distance fled, on the contrary,is greatest in twig anoles. Also, females flee less soon andrun over shorter distances than do males. Since twig anolesare considered the most cryptic anoles, and females may be lessconspicuous than males, these results corroborate the idea thatwell camouflaged animals allow predators to come closer. Theinterspecific variation in sexual dimorphism in escape behavior,however, cannot be explained by the interspecific variationin sexual size dimorphism or sexual dimorphism in microhabitatuse. Thus, escape behavior appears determined by different factorsin males and females.     

Dynamic Risk Assessment: Prey Rapidly Adjust Flight Initiation Distance to Changes in Predator Approach Speed

The pre‐eminent model of flight initiation distance assumes that the function relating predation risk to distance between predator and prey is constant. However, the risk–distance function can change dramatically during approaches by predators. Changes in predator behavior during approach and in availability of benefits (e.g. food or potential mates) may alter risks and/or costs during encounters. Thus, prey should be able to respond appropriately to changes in cues to risk, such as predator approach speed. Under the assumption that prey assess risk in real time, it was predicted that flight initiation distance (distance between predator and prey when escape begins) decreases when approach speed increases and increases when approach speed decreases during an encounter. Effects of single, abrupt changes from slower to faster approach or the reverse were studied in a lizard, Anolis lineatopus. Flight initiation distances were determined solely by final approach speed, being nearly identical for: (1) continuously fast approaches and approaches initially at the slower and finally at the faster speed and (2) for continuously slower approaches and approaches initially at faster and finally at slower speed. Escape should be adjusted to match changes in risk and cost caused by changes in predator behavior, ability to escape, and costs of escape as attacks unfold. A recent model by Broom and Ruxton [Behavioural Ecology (2004) vol. 16, pp. 534—540] predicts that cryptic prey should stay motionless until detected, then flee immediately. Our results suggest that current escape models can be applied to prey escape strategies when cues to risk change, by assuming that prey base decisions on the current relationship between risk and distance. Empirical studies are needed to test predictions concerning continuous risk assessment.     

堰蜒逃逸行为的影响因子

通过野外和室内实试检测蝘蜒逃逸行为的影响因子。野外研究显示,蝘蜒可接近距离与隐蔽所间距呈显著正相关。与动物体温和基底温度无关;在开阔生境中,成体和幼体的可接近距离相似．而郁闭生境中成体的可接近距离显著大于幼体。室内试验表明。两性蝘蜒的可接近距离差异显著,繁殖期雌体的可接近距离大于雄体。     

Optimal escape theory predicts escape behaviors beyond flight initiation distance： risk assessment and escape by striped plateau lizards Sceloporus virgatus

Escape theory predicts that flight initiation distance (FID=distance between predator and prey when escape begins) is longer when risk is greater and shorter when escape is more costly. A few tests suggest that escape theory applies to distance fled. Escape models have not addressed stochastic variables, such as probability of fleeing and of entering refuge, but their economic logic might be applicable. Experiments on several risk factors in the lizard Sceloporus virgatus confirmed all predictions for the above escape variables. FID was greater when approach was faster and more direct, for lizards on ground than on trees, for lizards rarely exposed to humans, for the second of two approaches, and when the predator turned toward lizards rather than away. Lizards fled further during rapid and second consecutive approaches. They were more likely to flee when approached directly, when a predator turned toward them, and during second approaches. They were more likely to enter refuge when approached rapidly. A novel finding is that perch height in trees was unrelated to FID because lizards escaped by moving out of sight, then moving up or down unpredictably. These findings add to a growing body of evidence supporting predictions of escape theory for FID and distance fled. They show that two probabilistic aspects of escape are predictable based on relative predation risk levels. Because individuals differ in boldness, the assessed optimal FID and threshold risks for fleeing and entering refuge are exceeded for an increasing proportion of individuals as risk increases[Current Zoology 55(2):123-131,2009].     

A rare predator exploits prey escape behavior: the role of tail-fanning and plumage contrast in foraging of the painted redstart (Myioborus pictus)

Escape response, triggered by an approaching predator, is acommon antipredatory adaptation of arthropods against insectivores.The painted redstart, Myioborus pictus, represents insectivorousbirds that exploit such antipredatory behaviors by flushing,chasing, and preying upon flushed arthropods. In field experimentsI showed that redstarts evoke jump and flight in prey by spreadingwings and tail: this display increased frequency of aerial chasesby redstarts. Artificial models with spread tails also elicitedescape responses more often than models with closed tails and wings.The white patches on black wings and tails additionally help:the frequency of chases decreased when the white patches werecovered with black dye. Black models also tended to elicit escaperesponse less often than black-and-white models did, at leastin some situations. Hence, the prey's ability to detect birdsand to flee could cause the evolution of predators specializedat using conspicuous behavior and contrast in body colorationto elicit and exploit such antipredatory responses. Redstartsconstitute only a small proportion of the predatory guild, andtheir adaptations to exploit the prey's behavior illustratethe theoretically modeled "rare enemy" effect present in multispeciespredator-prey systems. This is the first experimental studyof morphological and behavioral adaptations of a rare predatorthat both elicits and exploits antipredator escape behaviorof its prey against more common predators. Hence, the studydocuments a behavior that could be evolutionarily explainedonly if indirect interactions in predator-prey communities aretaken into account.     

Escape and alerting responses by Balearic lizards (Podarcis lilfordi) to movement and turning direction by nearby predators

Escape theory predicts that prey monitoring an approaching predator delay escape until predation risk outweighs costs of fleeing. However, if a predator is not detected until it is closer than the optimal flight initiation distance (FID = distance between predator and prey when escape begins), escape should begin immediately. Similarly, if a change in a nearby predator’s behavior indicates increased risk, the optimal FID increases, sometimes inducing immediate escape. If a predator that has been standing immobile near a prey suddenly turns toward the prey, greater risk is implied than if the predator turns away. If the immobile predator suddenly moves its foot without turning, it might be launching an attack. Therefore, we predicted that frequency of fleeing and preparation to flee are greater when a predator turns toward than away from prey and that frequency of fleeing when a predator suddenly moves decreases as distance between predator and prey increases. We verified these predictions in the Balearic lizard Podarcis lilfordi in field experiments in which an investigator simulated the predator. Lizards fled and performed alerting responses indicating readiness to flee more frequently when the predator turned toward than away from them, and fled more frequently the nearer the predator.     

The Effect of Human Presence and Human Activity on Risk Assessment and Flight Initiation Distance in Skinks

Antipredator behavior and risk assessment of many species are affected by the presence of humans and their activities. Previous studies have largely been conducted on birds and mammals and relatively less is known about human impacts on reptiles. We used flight initiation distance (FID) as a measure of risk assessment in inland blue‐tailed skinks (Emoia impar) and tested the direct and indirect effects of humans on risk assessment. We first examined the effects of varying levels and types of human disturbance and activity on skink FID. We found that skinks flushed at significantly longer distances in areas with the least human activity. We then tested the degree to which skinks are able to discriminate different numbers of humans by comparing FID across three different types of approaches. Skinks did not significantly differentiate between a single approacher and a single approacher coming from a group of two other people, but did flush at greater distances when approached by three people simultaneously. Although skinks are not directly harvested or harassed by humans, they have refined human discrimination abilities. Overall, skinks habituate to a variety of human activities and perceive a larger threat when the number of human approachers is greater.     

Flush early and avoid the rush? It may depend on where you stand

Optimal escape theory predicts that animals should flee at an optimal distance from the approaching predator (flight initiation distance, FID). However, FID usually increases with increasing alert distance (AD) or starting distance (SD). As an explanation for this pattern, the “flush early and avoid the rush” (FEAR) hypothesis states that prey should escape soon after detecting an approaching predator due to the cost of continuously monitoring risk. However, the positive relationship observed may also result from a mathematical artefact. Meanwhile, it is unknown whether animals would consistently follow this rule in different environmental contexts. We explored escape behaviours in light-vented bulbuls (Pycnonotus sinensis) perched at different heights. FID generally increased with increasing AD and decreasing perch height. The positive relationships between AD and FID were outside the 95% confidence levels of simulated slopes from Monte Carlo simulations, suggesting that the relationships observed reflect biological effects rather than merely a mathematical artefact. Increasing perch height was also associated with longer buffer distance (defined as FID minus AD or SD), suggesting that the birds tend to delay their flush after detecting an approaching predator when perched high. The effects of environmental contexts (and the associated predation risk) on the AD-FID relationship should be considered when performing inter-specific comparisons or meta-analyses.     

Collective detection in escape responses of temporary groups of Iberian green frogs

When confronted with a predator, prey are often in close proximityto conspecifics. This situation has generated several hypothesesregarding antipredator strategies adopted by individuals withingroups of gregarious species, such as the "risk dilution," "earlydetection," or "collective detection" effects. However, whethershort-term temporary aggregations of nongregarious animals arealso influenced in their escape decisions by nearby conspecificsremains little explored. We simulated predator approaches togreen frogs (Rana perezi) in the field while they were foragingat the edge of water, either alone or spatially aggregated intemporary clusters. "Flight initiation distances" of frogs (i.e.,the distance between the simulated predator and the frog atthe time it jumped) that escaped by jumping into the water wereinfluenced by microhabitat variables (vegetation at the edgeand in water and the initial distance of the frog to the closestwater edge) and also by the responses of nearby individuals.In clusters, risk dilution did not influence the first individualto respond to the predator simulation or the average responseof all frogs in the cluster as the frog's responses were independentof group size. Also, flight initiation distances of individualsthat first responded to the predator within clusters did notdiffer from those of solitary individuals, which is contraryto the predictions of the early detection hypothesis. However,the remaining frogs in the cluster had longer flight initiationdistances than expected from the comparison with solitary individuals.We suggest that this pattern originated because the responseof the first frog within a cluster triggered the sequentialresponse of the remaining frogs in the cluster, which agreeswith the expectations from the collective detection hypothesis.Our findings give insight into an early stage in the evolutionof grouping as they suggest that individual frogs may benefitfrom being part of a cluster, even for short periods of time.     

Complex Relationships amongst Parasite Load and Escape Behaviour in an Insular Lizard

Economic escape models predict escape decisions of prey which are approached by predators. Flight initiation distance (FID, predator–prey distance when prey begins to flee) and distance fled (DF) are major variables used to characterize escape responses. In optimal escape theory, FID increases as cost of not fleeing also increases. Moreover, FID decreases as cost of fleeing increases, due to lost opportunities to perform activities that may increase fitness. Finally, FID further increases as the prey's fitness increases. Some factors, including parasitism, may affect more than one of these predictors of FID. Initially, parasitized prey may have lower fitness as well as impaired locomotor ability, which would avoid predation and/or reduce their foraging ability, further decreasing the opportunity of fleeing. For example, if parasites decrease body condition, prey fitness is reduced and escape ability may be impaired. Hence, the overall influence of parasitism on FID is difficult to predict. We examined relationships between escape decisions and different traits: parasite load, body size and body condition in the Balearic lizard, Podarcis lilfordi. Lizards that showed higher haemogregarines load had longer FID and shorter DF. Although results did not confirm our initial predictions made on the basis of optimal escape theory, our findings suggest that parasites can alter several aspects of escape behaviour in a complex way.