Nature of full-length HMGB1 binding to cisplatin-modified DNA

HMGB1, a highly conserved non-histone DNA-binding protein, interacts with specific DNA structural motifs such as those encountered at cisplatin damage, four-way junctions, and supercoils. The interaction of full-length HMGB1, containing two tandem HMG box domains and a C-terminal acidic tail, with cisplatin-modified DNA was investigated by hydroxyl radical footprinting and electrophoretic gel mobility shift assays. The full-length HMGB1 protein binds to DNA containing a 1,2-intrastrand d(GpG) cross-link mainly through domain A, as revealed by footprinting, with a dissociation constant K(d) of 120 nM. Site-directed mutagenesis of intercalating residues in both HMG domains A and B in full-length HMGB1 further supports the conclusion that only one HMG box domain is bound to the site of cisplatin damage. Interaction of the C-terminal tail with the rest of the HMGB1 protein was examined by EDC cross-linking experiments. The acidic tail mainly interacts with domain B and linker regions rather than domain A in HMGB1. These results illuminate the respective roles of the tandem HMG boxes and the C-terminal acidic tail of HMGB1 in binding to DNA and to the major DNA adducts formed by the anticancer drug cisplatin.     

Interactions between HMG boxes.

Many proteins consist of subdomains that can fold and function independently. We investigate here the interaction between the two high mobility group (HMG) box subdomains of the nuclear protein rHMG1. An HMG box is a conserved amino acid sequence of approximately 80 amino acids rich in basic, aromatic and proline side chains that is active in binding DNA in a sequence or structure-specific manner. In the case of HMG1, each box can bind structural DNA substrates including four-way junctions (4WJs) and branched or kinked DNA duplexes. Since proteins containing up to six HMG boxes are known, the question arises whether linking subdomains together influences the folding or function of individual boxes. In an effort to understand interactions between individual DNA-binding domains in HMG1, we created new fusion proteins: one is an inversion of the order of the AB di-domain in HMG1 (BA); in the second, we added a third A domain C-terminal to the AB di-domain (ABA). Pairs of boxes, AB or BA, behave similarly and are functionally active. By contrast, the ABA triple subdomain construct is partially unfolded and is less active than individual boxes or di-domains. Thus, long-range inter-domain effects can influence the activity of HMG boxes.     

Tail-Mediated Collapse of HMGB1 Is Dynamic and Occurs via Differential Binding of the Acidic Tail to the A and B Domains

The architectural DNA-binding protein HMGB1 consists of two tandem HMG-box domains joined by a basic linker to a C-terminal acidic tail, which negatively regulates HMGB1-DNA interactions by binding intramolecularly to the DNA-binding faces of both basic HMG boxes. Here we demonstrate, using NMR chemical-shift mapping at different salt concentrations, that the tail has a higher affinity for the B box and that A box-tail interactions are preferentially disrupted. Previously, we proposed a model in which the boxes are brought together in a collapsed, tail-mediated assembly, which is in dynamic equilibrium with a more extended form. Small-angle X-ray scattering data are consistent with such a dynamic equilibrium between collapsed and extended structures and are best represented by an ensemble. The ensembles contain a significantly higher proportion of collapsed structures when the tail is present. ¹⁵N NMR relaxation measurements show that full-length HMGB1 has a significantly lower rate of rotational diffusion than the tail-less protein, consistent with the loss of independent domain motions in an assembled complex. Mapping studies using the paramagnetic spin label MTSL [(1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3-pyrrolidin-3-yl)methyl methanethiosulfonate] placed at three locations in the tail confirm our previous findings that the tail binds to both boxes with some degree of specificity. The end of the tail lies further from the body of the protein and is therefore potentially free to interact with other proteins. MTSL labelling at a single site in the A domain (C44) causes detectable relaxation enhancements of B domain residues, suggesting the existence of a “sandwich”-like collapsed structure in which the tail enables the close approach of the basic domains. These intramolecular interactions are presumably important for the dynamic association of HMGB1 with chromatin and provide a mechanism by which protein-protein interactions or posttranslational modifications might regulate the function of the protein at particular sites, or at particular stages in the cell cycle.     

HMGB binding to DNA: single and double box motifs

High mobility group (HMG) proteins are nuclear proteins believed to significantly affect DNA interactions by altering nucleic acid flexibility. Group B (HMGB) proteins contain HMG box domains known to bind to the DNA minor groove without sequence specificity, slightly intercalating base pairs and inducing a strong bend in the DNA helical axis. A dual-beam optical tweezers system is used to extend double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in the absence as well as presence of a single box derivative of human HMGB2 [HMGB2(box A)] and a double box derivative of rat HMGB1 [HMGB1(box A+box B)]. The single box domain is observed to reduce the persistence length of the double helix, generating sharp DNA bends with an average bending angle of 99 ± 9° and, at very high concentrations, stabilizing dsDNA against denaturation. The double box protein contains two consecutive HMG box domains joined by a flexible tether. This protein also reduces the DNA persistence length, induces an average bending angle of 77 ± 7°, and stabilizes dsDNA at significantly lower concentrations. These results suggest that single and double box proteins increase DNA flexibility and stability, albeit both effects are achieved at much lower protein concentrations for the double box. In addition, at low concentrations, the single box protein can alter DNA flexibility without stabilizing dsDNA, whereas stabilization at higher concentrations is likely achieved through a cooperative binding mode.     

Structural Analysis of HMGD-DNA Complexes Reveals Influence of Intercalation on Sequence Selectivity and DNA Bending

The ubiquitous, eukaryotic, high-mobility group box (HMGB) chromosomal proteins promote many chromatin-mediated cellular activities through their non-sequence-specific binding and bending of DNA. Minor-groove DNA binding by the HMG box results in substantial DNA bending toward the major groove owing to electrostatic interactions, shape complementarity, and DNA intercalation that occurs at two sites. Here, the structures of the complexes formed with DNA by a partially DNA intercalation-deficient mutant of Drosophila melanogaster HMGD have been determined by X-ray crystallography at a resolution of 2.85 Å. The six proteins and 50 bp of DNA in the crystal structure revealed a variety of bound conformations. All of the proteins bound in the minor groove, bridging DNA molecules, presumably because these DNA regions are easily deformed. The loss of the primary site of DNA intercalation decreased overall DNA bending and shape complementarity. However, DNA bending at the secondary site of intercalation was retained and most protein-DNA contacts were preserved. The mode of binding resembles the HMGB1 box A-cisplatin-DNA complex, which also lacks a primary intercalating residue. This study provides new insights into the binding mechanisms used by HMG boxes to recognize varied DNA structures and sequences as well as modulate DNA structure and DNA bending.     

A critical role in structure-specific DNA binding for the acetylatable lysine residues in HMGB1

The structure-specific DNA-binding protein HMGB1 (high-mobility group protein B1) which comprises two tandem HMG boxes (A and B) and an acidic C-terminal tail, is acetylated in vivo at Lys(2) and Lys(11) in the A box. Mutation to alanine of both residues in the isolated A domain, which has a strong preference for pre-bent DNA, abolishes binding to four-way junctions and 88 bp DNA minicircles. The same mutations in full-length HMGB1 also abolish its binding to four-way junctions, and binding to minicircles is substantially impaired. In contrast, when the acidic tail is absent (AB di-domain) there is little effect of the double mutation on four-way junction binding, although binding to minicircles is reduced approximately 15-fold. Therefore it appears that in AB the B domain is able to substitute for the non-functional A domain, whereas in full-length HMGB1 the B domain is masked by the acidic tail. In no case does single substitution of Lys(2) or Lys(11) abolish DNA binding. The double mutation does not significantly perturb the structure of the A domain. We conclude that Lys(2) and Lys(11) are critical for binding of the isolated A domain and HMGB1 to distorted DNA substrates.     

Structural requirements for cooperative binding of HMG1 to DNA minicircles

DNA minicircles, where the length of DNA is below the persistence length, are highly effective, preferred, ligands for HMG-box proteins. The proteins bind to them "structure-specifically" with affinities in the nanomolar range, presumably to an exposed widened minor groove. To understand better the basis of this preference, we have studied the binding of HMG1 (which has two tandem HMG boxes linked by a basic extension to a long acidic tail) and Drosophila HMG-D (one HMG box linked by a basic region to a short and less acidic tail), and their HMG-box domains, to 88 bp and 75 bp DNA minicircles. In some cases we see cooperative binding of two molecules to the circles. The requirements for strong cooperativity are two HMG boxes and the basic extension; the latter also appears to stabilize and constrain the complex, preventing binding of further protein molecules. HMG-D, with a single HMG box, does not bind cooperatively. In the case of HMG1, the acidic tail is not required for cooperativity and does not affect binding significantly, in contrast to a much greater effect with linear DNA, or even four-way junctions (another distorted DNA substrate). Such effects could be relevant in the hierarchy of binding of HMG-box proteins to DNA distortions in vivo, where both single-box and two-box proteins might co-exist, with or without basic extensions and acidic tails.     

Floppy SOX: mutual induced fit in hmg (high-mobility group) box-DNA recognition

The high-mobility group (HMG) box defines a DNA-bending motif of broad interest in relation to human development and disease. Major and minor wings of an L-shaped structure provide a template for DNA bending. As in the TATA-binding protein and a diverse family of factors, insertion of one or more side chains between base pairs induces a DNA kink. The HMG box binds in the DNA minor groove and may be specific for DNA sequence or distorted DNA architecture. Whereas the angular structures of non-sequence-specific domains are well ordered, free SRY and related autosomal SOX domains are in part disordered. Observations suggesting that the minor wing lacks a fixed tertiary structure motivate the hypothesis that DNA bending and stabilization of protein structure define a coupled process. We further propose that mutual induced fit in SOX-DNA recognition underlies the sequence dependence of DNA bending and enables the induction of promoter-specific architectures.     

Mutagenesis analysis of the interaction between the dorsal rel homology domain and HMG boxes of DSP1 protein

DSP1 is an HMG-like protein of Drosophila melanogaster consisting of 386 amino acids with two HMG domains at the C-terminal end. It was shown to interact with Dorsal protein through the HMG domains and to enhance its DNA binding. Each HMG domain consists of approximately 80 amino acid residues, forming three alpha helices folded into an L-shaped structure. We have compared the interaction of various truncated and mutated forms of DSP1 with the dorsal Rel homology domain (RHD). In particular, we have mutated the conserved tryptophan residue 212 or 302 in A or B boxes or the lysine-rich region ((253)KKRK(256)) of the A/B linker. Analysis by circular dichroism revealed that the protein tertiary structure is affected in these mutants. However, these mutations do not abolish the DSP1 binding to Dorsal, except if the two HMG boxes are altered, i.e., in a double mutant or in mutant isolated domain. Finally, studies on the enhancement of Dorsal DNA binding by DSP1 revealed that the DNA affinity is maximum in the presence of wild-type DSP1, is dramatically reduced when box A is altered, and is completely abolished when box B is altered.     

The long acidic tail of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein forms an extended and flexible structure that interacts with specific residues within and between the HMG boxes

HMGB1 (high mobility group B1) is a conserved chromosomal protein composed of two similar DNA binding domains (HMG box A and box B) linked by a short basic stretch to an acidic C-terminal tail of 30 residues. The acidic tail modulates the DNA binding properties of HMGB1, and its length differentiates the various HMGB family members. We synthesized a peptide that corresponds to the acidic tail in HMGB1 (T-peptide) and studied its binding to the single boxes and to the fragment corresponding to tailless HMGB1 (designated as AB(bt) fragment). CD spectroscopy showed that T-peptide stabilizes significantly the AB(bt) fragment and that the complex has an identical thermal stability as full-length HMGB1. Calorimetric and NMR data showed that T-peptide binds with a dissociation constant of 9 microM to box A and much more weakly to box B. (1)H-(15)N HSQC spectra of full-length HMGB1 and of the AB(bt) fragment are very similar; the small chemical shift differences that exist correspond to those residues of the AB(bt) fragment that were affected by the addition of the T-peptide. We conclude that the T-peptide mimics closely the acidic tail and that the basic stretch and the acidic tail form an extended and flexible segment. The tail interacts with specific residues in the boxes and shields them from other interactions.     

The interaction of HMGB1 and linker histones occurs through their acidic and basic tails

H1 and HMGB1 bind to linker DNA in chromatin, in the vicinity of the nucleosome dyad. They appear to have opposing effects on the nucleosome, H1 stabilising it by "sealing" two turns of DNA around the octamer, and HMGB1 destabilising it, probably by bending the adjacent DNA. Their presence in chromatin might be mutually exclusive. Displacement/replacement of one by the other as a result of their highly dynamic binding in vivo might, in principle, involve interactions between them. Chemical cross-linking and gel-filtration show that a 1:1 linker histone/HMGB1 complex is formed, which persists at physiological ionic strength, and that complex formation requires the acidic tail of HMGB1. NMR spectroscopy shows that the linker histone binds, predominantly through its basic C-terminal domain, to the acidic tail of HMGB1, thereby disrupting the interaction of the tail with the DNA-binding faces of the HMG boxes. A potential consequence of this interaction is enhanced DNA binding by HMGB1, and concomitantly lowered affinity of H1 for DNA. In a chromatin context, this might facilitate displacement of H1 by HMGB1.     

Dual binding modes for an HMG domain from human HMGB2 on DNA

High mobility group B (HMGB) proteins contain two HMG box domains known to bind without sequence specificity into the DNA minor groove, slightly intercalating between basepairs and producing a strong bend in the DNA backbone. We use optical tweezers to measure the forces required to stretch single DNA molecules. Parameters describing DNA flexibility, including contour length and persistence length, are revealed. In the presence of nanomolar concentrations of isolated HMG box A from HMGB2, DNA shows a decrease in its persistence length, where the protein induces an average DNA bend angle of 114 +/- 21 degrees for 50 mM Na+, and 87 +/- 9 degrees for 100 mM Na+. The DNA contour length increases from 0.341 +/- 0.003 to 0.397 +/- 0.012 nm per basepair, independent of salt concentration. In 50 mM Na+, the protein does not unbind even at high DNA extension, whereas in 100 mM Na+, the protein appears to unbind only below concentrations of 2 nM. These observations support a flexible hinge model for noncooperative HMG binding at low protein concentrations. However, at higher protein concentrations, a cooperative filament mode is observed instead of the hinge binding. This mode may be uniquely characterized by this high-force optical tweezers experiment.     

Structure-specific binding of the two tandem HMG boxes of HMG1 to four-way junction DNA is mediated by the A domain

We have investigated the nature of the "structure-specific" binding of the tandem A and B HMG boxes of high mobility group protein 1 (HMG1) to four-way junction DNA. AB didomain binding favours the open, planar form of the junction, as shown by reaction with potassium permanganate. Site-directed cleavage of the DNA by a 1, 10-phenanthroline-copper moiety attached to unique natural or engineered cysteine residues in the A or B domain shows that the two linked HMG boxes are not functionally equivalent in four-way junction binding. The A domain of the didomain binds to the centre of the junction, mediating structure-specific binding; the concave surface of the domain interacts with the widened minor groove at the centre, contacting one of the four strands of the junction, and the short arm comprising helices I and II and the connecting loop protrudes into the central hole. The B domain makes contacts along one of the arms, presumably stabilising the binding of the didomain through additional non-sequence-specific interactions. The isolated B domain can, however, bind to the centre of the junction. The preferential binding of the A domain of the AB didomain to the centre correlates with our previous finding of a higher preference of the isolated A domain than of the B domain for this structurally distinct DNA ligand. It is probably at least partly due to the higher positive surface potential in the DNA-binding region of the A domain (in particular to an array of positively charged side-chains suitably positioned to interact with the negatively charged phosphates surrounding the central hole of the junction) and partly to differences in residues corresponding to those that intercalate between bases in other HMG box/DNA complexes.     

The DNA sequence specificity of HMG boxes lies in the minor wing of the structure.

To establish the basis of sequence-specific DNA recognition by HMG boxes we separately transferred the minor and major wings from the sequence-specific HMG box of TCF1 alpha into their equivalent position in the non-sequence-specific box 2 of HMG1. Thus chimera THT1 contains the minor wing (of 11 N-terminal and 25 C-terminal residues) from the HMG box of TCF1 alpha and the major wing (the 45 residue central section) from HMG1 box 2, whilst the situation is reversed in chimera HTH1. The structural integrity of the two chimeric proteins was established by CD, NMR and their binding to four-way junction DNA. Gel retardation and circular permutation assays showed that only chimera THT1, containing the TCF1 alpha minor wing, formed a sequence-specific complex and bent the DNA. The bend angle was estimated to be 59 degrees for chimera THT1 and 52 degrees for the HMG box of TCF1 alpha. Our results, in combination with mutagenesis and other data, suggests a model for the DNA binding of HMG boxes in which the N-terminal residues and part of helix 1 contact the minor groove on the outside of a bent DNA duplex.     

Characterization of the interaction between HMGB1 and H3—a possible means of positioning HMGB1 in chromatin

High mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) binds to the internucleosomal linker DNA in chromatin and abuts the nucleosome. Bending and untwisting of the linker DNA results in transmission of strain to the nucleosome core, disrupting histone/DNA contacts. An interaction between H3 and HMGB1 has been reported. Here we confirm and characterize the interaction of HMGB1 with H3, which lies close to the DNA entry/exit points around the nucleosome dyad, and may be responsible for positioning of HMGB1 on the linker DNA. We show that the interaction is between the N-terminal unstructured tail of H3 and the C-terminal unstructured acidic tail of HMGB1, which are presumably displaced from DNA and the HMG boxes, respectively, in the HMGB1-nucleosome complex. We have characterized the interaction by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and show that it is extensive for both peptides, and appears not to result in the acquisition of significant secondary structure by either partner.     

Thermodynamics of HMGB1 interaction with duplex DNA

The high mobility group protein HMGB1 is a small, highly abundant protein that binds to DNA in a non-sequence-specific manner. HMGB1 consists of 2 DNA binding domains, the HMG boxes A and B, followed by a short basic region and a continuous stretch of 30 glutamate or aspartate residues. Isothermal titration calorimetry was used to characterize the binding of HMGB1 to the double-stranded model DNAs poly(dAdT).(dTdA) and poly(dGdC).(dCdG). To elucidate the contribution of the different structural motifs to DNA binding, calorimetric measurements were performed comparing the single boxes A and B, the two boxes plus or minus the basic sequence stretch (AB(bt) and AB), and the full-length HMGB1 protein. Thermodynamically, binding of HMGB1 and all truncated constructs to duplex DNA was characterized by a positive enthalpy change at 15 degrees C. From the slopes of the temperature dependence of the binding enthalpies, heat capacity changes of -0.129 +/- 0.02 and -0.105 +/- 0.05 kcal mol(-1) K(-1) were determined for box A and full-length HMGB1, respectively. Significant differences in the binding characteristics were observed using full-length HMGB1, suggesting an important role for the acid tail in modulating DNA binding. Moreover, full-length HMGB1 binds differently these two DNA templates: binding to poly(dAdT).(dTdA) was cooperative, had a larger apparent binding site size, and proceeded with a much larger unfavorable binding enthalpy than binding to poly(dGdC).(dCdG).