共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Daniel R. Schlaepfer Peter J. Edwards John C. Semple Regula Billeter 《Journal of Biogeography》2008,35(11):2119-2127
Aim Newly formed polyploids experience problems of establishment and spread similar to those faced by newly introduced alien species. To understand the significance of polyploidy in biological invasions, we mapped the distribution of ploidy levels in Solidago gigantea Aiton in its native range in North America, and in Europe and East Asia where it is invasive. Location North America, Europe and East Asia. Methods Flow cytometry was used to measure ploidy levels in a total of 834 plants from 149 locations. Together with data from contributors and a literature review, ploidy‐level data were assembled for 336 locations. Cytogeographical maps from North America and Europe were prepared, incorporating new and previously published ploidy‐level data. Results In the native range, diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid plants were found, and also one triploid and one pentaploid plant (2n = 3x and 2n = 5x, respectively, each being new reports for this species). There was a high degree of geographical separation among the ploidy levels, and populations with mixed ploidy were rare. However, four zones were identified where plants of different ploidy could come into contact. In Europe and East Asia, only tetraploid plants were found. Main conclusions The geographical pattern in North America suggests that the ploidy levels are ecologically differentiated, although further investigations are needed to identify the nature of these differences. Alien populations appear to be exclusively tetraploid, but it is not clear whether this is because tetraploids were selectively introduced or because diploids were unsuccessful. In any case, comparisons between native and introduced populations need to account for ploidy level. 相似文献
2.
Introduced plants may leave their specialized herbivores behind when they invade new ranges. The Evolution of Increased Competitive
Ability (EICA) Hypothesis holds that this escape from herbivory could lead to reduced investment in defenses, thereby freeing
resources for growth and reproduction. We tested the prediction that introduced genotypes of Solidago gigantea would outperform native genotypes when grown in the absence of herbivores, and examined whether tolerance to insect herbivory
has changed in introduced genotypes. S. gigantea is native to North America and an exotic invasive in Europe. Insect damage reduced plant growth and biomass for both native
and exotic genotypes. While there was no evidence that continent of origin influenced the degree to which plants compensated
for herbivory, the mechanisms contributing to recovery differed for native and exotic plants. Damaged US plants showed enhanced
photosynthetic rates to a greater extent than damaged European plants, while damaged European plants carried more leaves than
damaged US plants. At the end of the season, leaf mass of European plants was significantly greater than that of US plants.
Contrary to the predictions of the EICA hypothesis, US plants were more likely to flower than European plants. European plants
invested significantly more of their total reproductive biomass into rhizomes rather than flowers than US plants. While other
work with S. gigantea has supported some aspects of the EICA hypothesis, the results reported here generally do not. We conclude that multiple
factors influence the success of introduced plants. 相似文献
3.
Introduced species, which establish in novel environments, provide an opportunity to explore trait evolution and how it may contribute to the distribution and spread of species. Here, we explore trait changes of the perennial herb Lupinus polyphyllus based on 11 native populations in the western USA and 17 introduced populations in Finland. More specifically, we investigated whether introduced populations outperformed native populations in traits measured in situ (seed mass) and under common garden conditions during their first year (plant size, flowering probability, and number of flowering shoots). We also explored whether climate of origin (temperature) influenced plant traits and quantified the degree to which trait variability was explained collectively by country and temperature as compared to other population‐level differences. Three out of four plant traits differed between the native and introduced populations; only seed mass was similar between countries, with most of its variation attributed to other sources of intraspecific variation not accounted for by country and temperature. Under common garden conditions, plants originating from introduced populations were larger than those originating from native populations. However, plants from the introduced range flowered less frequently and had fewer flowering shoots than their native‐range counterparts. Temperature of a population''s origin influenced plant size in the common garden, with plant size increasing with increasing mean annual temperature in both native and introduced populations. Our results of the first year reveal genetic basis for phenotypic differences in some fitness‐related traits between the native and introduced populations of L. polyphyllus. However, not all of these trait differences necessarily contribute to the invasion success of the species and thus may not be adaptive, which raises a question how persistent the trait differences observed in the first year are later in individuals’ life for perennial herbs. 相似文献
4.
加拿大一枝黄花入侵林地对植物多样性的影响及其季节变化 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
研究了受加拿大一枝黄花(Solidago canadensis)入侵的半自然林地的植物物种多样性变化,以期揭示该入侵植物对物种多样性的直接影响规律。结果显示,加拿大一枝黄花对林地的入侵造成了植物多样性的下降,入侵区植物的多样性指数小于对照区和只有少量加拿大一枝黄花入侵的蔓延区,而对照区和蔓延区之间并无显著差异。植物多样性指数和群落均匀度指数在不同季节问存在较大变化:多样性指数从4月到11月呈现F降趋势,而从1月份开始多样性指数开始升高。加拿大一枝黄花入侵对物种多样性的影响在6月到10月份最为严重,这可能是由于这段时间该入侵植物通过旺盛的克隆生长侵占了大部分生境排挤了土著植物。可见,虽然在林下的生长受抑。加拿大一枝黄花仍可能通i寸克降繁殖占据牛境.造成林地植物多样性的下降。 相似文献
5.
6.
Invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica Cham.) grow larger than native individuals under reduced competition 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
Invasive plants can be larger and more fecund in their invasive range than in their native range, although it is unknown how often this is a result of a genetically controlled shift in traits, a plastic response to a favourable environment, or a combination thereof. Here we present data from common garden experiments that compare the size and fecundity of native and invasive California poppies, Eschscholzia californica Cham. Individuals from 20 populations, half from California (native) and half from Chile (invasive), were grown both with and without competition from other plants in a container experiment and at two field locations. There were no differences in survival between native and invasive plants at any location. We found significant increases in size and fecundity in invasive populations at two of three locations when poppies were grown without competition from other plants. Our results indicate that genetic shifts in traits have occurred in invasive populations, and that the invasive plants are better at maximizing growth and reproduction in open environments. 相似文献
7.
Helen M Hull-Sanders Robert H Johnson Heather A Owen Gretchen A Meyer 《Plant signaling & behavior》2009,4(9):893-895
Herbivores are sensitive to the genetic structure of plant populations, as genetics underlies plant phenotype and host quality. Polyploidy is a widespread feature of angiosperm genomes, yet few studies have examined how polyploidy influences herbivores. Introduction to new ranges, with consequent changes in selective regimes, can lead to evolution of changes in plant defensive characteristics and also affect herbivores. Here, we examine how insect herbivores respond to polyploidy in Solidago gigantea, using plants derived from both the native range (USA) and introduced range (Europe). S. gigantea has three cytotypes in the US, with two of these present in Europe. We performed bioassays with generalist (Spodoptera exigua) and specialist (Trirhabda virgata) leaf-feeding insects. Insects were reared on detached leaves (Spodoptera) or potted host plants (Trirhabda) and mortality and mass were measured. Trirhabda larvae showed little variation in survival or pupal mass attributable to either cytotype or plant origin. Spodoptera larvae were more sensitive to both cytotype and plant origin: they grew best on European tetraploids and poorly on US diploids (high mortality) and US tetraploids (low larval mass). These results show that both cytotype and plant origin influence insect herbivores, but that generalist and specialist insects may respond differently.Key words: polyploidy, cytotype, Solidago gigantea, insect herbivore, herbivory, invasive plant, introduced plantPolyploidy, or the possession of more than two sets of homologous chromosomes, is a fundamental force in angiosperm evolution.1,2 Many plant species or species complexes consist of multiple cytotypes that may occur sympatrically;3 this is an important source of genetic structure in plant populations that is often overlooked.4 Possession of multiple genomes may confer advantages to polyploid plants such as increased heterozygosity, a decreased probability of inbreeding depression, or a greater gene pool available for selection; these traits contribute to the widespread success of polyploids and may make them prone to invasiveness.5,6 In a recent article,7 we examined the functional consequences of polyploidy for different cytotypes of Solidago gigantea Ait. (Asteraceae), collected from both its native range (North America) and its introduced range (Europe). In this addendum, we show how cytotype and continent of origin influence interactions of S. gigantea with insect herbivores. Interactions with herbivores are expected to vary with cytotype because of phenotypic changes associated with polyploidy, but this area has received little study (reviewed in refs. 8–11). Plant origin, from either the native range or an introduced range, should also influence herbivores. Plants may escape from their specialist natural enemies in the introduced range, thereby experiencing reduced herbivore pressure from an insect community dominated by generalists.12,13 Given sufficient time, plants from the introduced range may evolve to decrease investment in anti-herbivore defenses, particularly those effective against specialists.14 While a growing body of research has addressed whether plant defenses against herbivory are lower in the introduced range,12,15,16 few of these studies have also examined the influence of cytotype.17Three cytotypes of S. gigantea can be found in its native range in North America (diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid, 2n = 18, 36 and 54 respectively). These are morphologically indistinguishable and not generally treated as separate species.18 In Europe, where S. gigantea was introduced in the mid 18th century,19 tetraploids are the dominant cytotype but diploids also occur. S. gigantea supports a diverse array of insect herbivores in its native range, but has few natural enemies in its introduced range.20 We report here on experiments using both a generalist and a specialist leaf-chewing insect. The generalist, Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is widely distributed and highly polyphagous, while the specialist Trirhabda virgata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) feeds only on closely-related species within the genus Solidago. T. virgata is an outbreak insect that can be a major defoliator of S. gigantea and related species in North America.21 We grew plants originating from 10 populations in the US and 20 populations in Europe in common gardens at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Field Station in Saukville, Wisconsin. There were five plant origin-cytotype combinations: three cytotypes from the US and two from Europe. Insects were reared on detached leaves from a single plant (Spodoptera) or on potted host plants (Trirhabda), for a set period of 21 d (Spodoptera) or until pupation (Trirhabda). We recorded insect survival and mass at the end of 21 d (Spodoptera) or at pupation (Trirhabda) (reviewed in ref. 22).Overall survival was much better for the specialist Trirhabda than for the generalist Spodoptera (91% vs. 72%). Spodoptera larvae are not generally found on S. gigantea in the field, and while they are able to complete development, we found that this plant was not an ideal host. Spodoptera larvae were more sensitive to differences among cytotype and plant origin than were Trirhabda larvae. Percent survival was particularly poor for Spodoptera larvae reared on diploids from the US, where slightly more than half of the caterpillars survived for 21 days (Fig. 1). Trirhabda pupal mass was remarkably consistent across the five ploidy-plant origin combinations. In contrast, Spodoptera larvae responded to both cytotype and continent of origin. Surviving Spodoptera larvae did particularly well on tetraploid plants from the introduced range (Europe), and particularly poorly on tetraploids from the US (Fig. 1). We have previously reported that Spodoptera grow better on plants from Europe;22 our current results reveal that this difference is due exclusively to better growth on tetraploid plants. However, our results also show that both diploids and tetraploids from the US were poor hosts for Spodoptera: diploids because they caused high mortality and tetraploids because they resulted in poor growth. These results indicate that plants from the introduced range have reduced defenses against herbivores, even when accounting for polyploidy.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Mass ± se of S. exigua (A) and T. virgata (B) larvae reared on host plants of different cytotypes of Solidago gigantea originating from the US (native range) or europe (introduced range). Means in A followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by multiple Student''s t-tests with Bonferroni correction). There were no significant differences in (B). Sample sizes for (A and B) shown in Spodoptera Trirhabda No. Surviving Initial No. % Survival No. Surviving Initial No. % Survival US-Diploid 21 39 54 37 39 95 US-Tetraploid 70 93 75 82 92 89 US-Hexaploid 16 24 67 23 24 96 EU-Diploid 15 23 65 23 24 96 EU-Tetraploid 101 129 78 114 129 88