Rapid intracellular alkalinization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MATa cells in response to alpha-factor requires the CDC25 gene product

The alpha-factor mating pheromone induces a transient intracellular alkalinization of MATa cells within minutes after exposure to the pheromone, and is the earliest biochemical event that can be identified subsequent to the exposure. Dissipation of the pheromone induced pH gradient, using 2,4-dinitrophenol or sodium orthovanadate, does not inhibit the biological response of the yeast to the pheromone such as mating and 'schmoo' formation. These findings suggest that the pheromone mediated pH change per se is not a part of the transmembrane signalling but rather the consequence of a biochemical reaction triggered by the alpha-pheromone interaction with its receptor and may have a permissive effect on the pheromonal response. The cdc25ts mutation causes MATa cells to become nonresponsive to alpha-factor subsequent to a shift to the restrictive temperature, suggesting that the CDC25 gene product participates in the pheromone response pathway.     

Ustilago maydisMating Hyphae Orient Their Growth toward Pheromone Sources

Snetselaar, K. M., Bölker, M., and Kahmann, R. 1996.Ustilago maydismating hyphae orient their growth toward pheromone sources.Fungal Genetics and Biology20,299–312. When small drops ofUstilago maydissporidia were placed 100–200 μm apart on agar surfaces and covered with paraffin oil, sporidia from one drop formed thin hyphae that grew in a zig-zag fashion toward the other drop if it contained sporidia making the appropriate pheromone. For example,a2b2mating hyphae grew towarda1b1anda1b2mating hyphae, and the filaments eventually fused tip to tip. Time-lapse photography indicated that the mating hyphae can rapidly change orientation in response to nearby compatible sporidia. When exposed to pheromone produced by cells in an adjacent drop, haploid sporidia with thea2allele began elongating before sporidia with thea1allele. Sporidia without functional pheromone genes responded to pheromone although they did not induce a response, and sporidia without pheromone receptors induced formation of mating hyphae although they did not form mating hyphae. Diploid sporidia heterozygous atbbut not ataformed straight, rigid, aerial filaments when exposed to pheromone produced by the appropriate haploid sporidia. Again, thea2a2b1b2strain formed filaments more quickly than thea1a1b1b2strain. Taken together, these results suggest that thea2pheromone diffuses less readily or is degraded more quickly than thea1pheromone.     

The Pheromone Receptors Inhibit the Pheromone Response Pathway in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae by a Process That Is Independent of Their Associated Gα Protein

Dominant mutations at the DAF2 locus confer resistance to the cell-cycle arrest that normally occurs in MATa cells exposed to α-factor. One of these alleles, DAF2-2, has also been shown to suppress the constitutive signaling phenotype of null alleles of the gene encoding the α subunit of the G protein involved in pheromone signaling. These observations indicate that DAF2-2 inhibits transmission of the pheromone response signal. The DAF2-2 mutation has two effects on the expression of a pheromone inducible gene, FUS1. In DAF2-2 cells, FUS1 RNA is present at an increased basal level but is no longer fully inducible by pheromone. Cloning of DAF2-2 revealed that it is an allele of STE3, the gene encoding the a-factor receptor. STE3 is normally an α-specific gene, but is inappropriately expressed in a cells carrying a STE3(DAF2-2) allele. The two effects of STE3(DAF2-2) alleles on the pheromone response pathway are the result of different functions of the receptor. The increased basal level of FUS1 RNA is probably due to stimulation of the pathway by an autocrine mechanism, because it required at least one of the genes encoding a-factor. Suppression of a null allele of the G(α) subunit gene, the phenotype associated with the inhibitory function of STE3, was independent of a-factor. This suppression was also observed when the wild-type STE3 gene was expressed in a cells under the control of an inducible promoter. Inappropriate expression of STE2 in α cells was able to suppress a point mutation, but not a null allele, of the G(α) subunit gene. The ability of the pheromone receptors to block the pheromone response signal in the absence of the G(α) subunit indicates that these receptors interact with another component of the signal transduction pathway.     

Robust Spatial Sensing of Mating Pheromone Gradients by Yeast Cells

Projecting or moving up a chemical gradient is a universal behavior of living organisms. We tested the ability of S. cerevisiae a-cells to sense and respond to spatial gradients of the mating pheromone α-factor produced in a microfluidics chamber; the focus was on bar1Δ strains, which do not degrade the pheromone input. The yeast cells exhibited good accuracy with the mating projection typically pointing in the correct direction up the gradient (∼80% under certain conditions), excellent sensitivity to shallow gradients, and broad dynamic range so that gradient-sensing was relatively robust over a 1000-fold range of average α-factor concentrations. Optimal directional sensing occurred at lower concentrations (5 nM) close to the K_d of the receptor and with steeper gradient slopes. Pheromone supersensitive mutations (sst2Δ and ste2^300Δ) that disrupt the down-regulation of heterotrimeric G-protein signaling caused defects in both sensing and response. Interestingly, yeast cells employed adaptive mechanisms to increase the robustness of the process including filamentous growth (i.e. directional distal budding) up the gradient at low pheromone concentrations, bending of the projection to be more aligned with the gradient, and forming a more accurate second projection when the first projection was in the wrong direction. Finally, the cells were able to amplify a shallow external gradient signal of α-factor to produce a dramatic polarization of signaling proteins at the front of the cell. Mathematical modeling revealed insights into the mechanism of this amplification and how the supersensitive mutants can disrupt accurate polarization. Together, these data help to specify and elucidate the abilities of yeast cells to sense and respond to spatial gradients of pheromone.     

Isolation and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants supersensitive to G1 arrest by the mating hormone a-factor

Summary Nine independent mutants which are supersensitive (ssl ^–) to G1 arrest by the mating hormone a-factor were isolated by screening mutagenized Saccharomyces cerevisiae MAT cells on solid medium for increased growth inhibition with a-factor. These mutants carried lesions in two complementation groups, ssl1 and ssl2. Mutations at the ssl1 locus were mating type specific: MAT ssl1 ^– cells were supersensitive to -factor but MAT ssl1 ^– were not supersensitive to -factor. In contrast, mutations at the ssl2. locus conferred supersensitivity to the mating hormone of the opposite mating type on both MAT, and MATa cells. The -cell specific capacity to inactivate externally added a-factor was shown to be lacking in MAT ssl1 ^– mutants whereas MAT ssl2. cells were able to inactivate a-factor. Complementation analysis showed that ssl2 and sst2, a mutation originally isolated as conferring supersensitivity to -factor to MATa cells, are lesions in the same gene. The ssl1 gene was mapped 30.5 centi-Morgans distal to ilv5 on chromosome XII.     

Characterization of α-factor pheromone and pheromone receptor genes of Ashbya gossypii

The genome of Ashbya gossypii contains homologs of most of the genes that are part of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone-signal transduction cascade. However, we currently lack understanding of a potential sexual cycle for this pre-whole genome duplication hemiascomycete. The sequenced strain bears three identical copies encoding MATa. We show that the syntenic A. gossypii homolog of MFα1 (AFL062w) does not encode a mature α-factor peptide, but identified another gene, AAR163c, which encodes a candidate α-specific mating pheromone and is thus reannotated as AgMFα2. The expression of the AgSTE2α-factor receptor in an Scste2 S. cerevisiae MATa strain resulted in dosage-dependent growth arrest upon exposure to A. gossypiiα-factor, which indicated that the pheromone response was effectively coupled to the S. cerevisiae signal transduction cascade. Comparison of α-pheromones and α-pheromone receptors showed greater conservation between Eremothecium cymbalariae and S. cerevisiae than between A. gossypii and E. cymbalariae. We constructed A. gossypii strains deleted for the STE2 and STE3 pheromone receptors. These strains showed no phenotypic abnormalities and an ste2, ste3 double mutant is still able to sporulate. The deletion of STE12 as the downstream target of pheromone signalling, however, led to a hypersporulation phenotype.     

Modelling of Yeast Mating Reveals Robustness Strategies for Cell-Cell Interactions

Mating of budding yeast cells is a model system for studying cell-cell interactions. Haploid yeast cells secrete mating pheromones that are sensed by the partner which responds by growing a mating projection toward the source. The two projections meet and fuse to form the diploid. Successful mating relies on precise coordination of dynamic extracellular signals, signaling pathways, and cell shape changes in a noisy background. It remains elusive how cells mate accurately and efficiently in a natural multi-cell environment. Here we present the first stochastic model of multiple mating cells whose morphologies are driven by pheromone gradients and intracellular signals. Our novel computational framework encompassed a moving boundary method for modeling both a-cells and α-cells and their cell shape changes, the extracellular diffusion of mating pheromones dynamically coupled with cell polarization, and both external and internal noise. Quantification of mating efficiency was developed and tested for different model parameters. Computer simulations revealed important robustness strategies for mating in the presence of noise. These strategies included the polarized secretion of pheromone, the presence of the α-factor protease Bar1, and the regulation of sensing sensitivity; all were consistent with data in the literature. In addition, we investigated mating discrimination, the ability of an a-cell to distinguish between α-cells either making or not making α-factor, and mating competition, in which multiple a-cells compete to mate with one α-cell. Our simulations were consistent with previous experimental results. Moreover, we performed a combination of simulations and experiments to estimate the diffusion rate of the pheromone a-factor. In summary, we constructed a framework for simulating yeast mating with multiple cells in a noisy environment, and used this framework to reproduce mating behaviors and to identify strategies for robust cell-cell interactions.     

Synthetic Morphology Using Alternative Inputs

Designing the shape and size of a cell is an interesting challenge for synthetic biology. Prolonged exposure to the mating pheromone α-factor induces an unusual morphology in yeast cells: multiple mating projections. The goal of this work was to reproduce the multiple projections phenotype in the absence of α-factor using a gain-of-function approach termed “Alternative Inputs (AIs)”. An alternative input is defined as any genetic manipulation that can activate the signaling pathway instead of the natural input. Interestingly, none of the alternative inputs were sufficient to produce multiple projections although some produced a single projection. Then, we extended our search by creating all combinations of alternative inputs and deletions that were summarized in an AIs-Deletions matrix. We found a genetic manipulation (AI-Ste5p ste2Δ) that enhanced the formation of multiple projections. Following up this lead, we demonstrated that AI-Ste4p and AI-Ste5p were sufficient to produce multiple projections when combined. Further, we showed that overexpression of a membrane-targeted form of Ste5p alone could also induce multiple projections. Thus, we successfully re-engineered the multiple projections mating morphology using alternative inputs without α-factor.     

α-Factor inhibition of the rate of cell passage through the “start” step of cell division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast: Estimation of the division delay per α-factor·receptor complex

A highly sensitive, kinetically unambiguous assay for α-factor-induced delay of cell passage through the “start” step of cell division in yeast is presented. The assay employs perfusion with periodic microscopy to monitor the bud emergence kinetics on the 20% of cells within an exponentially growing population which exist prior to the α-factor execution point of start. The t_1/2 for cell passage through start by this population of cells is 31 min in the absence of α-factor. The inhibition constant, K_I, represents the α-factor concentration which produces a 50% inhibition of this rate and is equal to 2×10⁻¹⁰M. A second assay for maximal cell division arrest by α-factor on whole populations of cells is presented. This assay shows a maximum cell division arrest time of 125±5 h at saturating α-factor, and a K₅₀ (that is, an α-factor concentration which produces a half-maximal response) of 2.5×10⁻⁸M. Both assays were performed in the effective absence of α-factor inactivation. Values of the dissociation constant K_D and total number of receptors per cell which specifically mediate cell division arrest or delay were estimated to be 2.5×10⁻⁸M and 10⁴, respectively. These estimates, along with the quantitative dose-response data for division arrest which are presented here, are consistent with each receptor·α-factor complex which is present on the cell at equilibrium producing a 43±10 s delay of cell passage through start. Surprisingly, this number is constant within twofold over the entire range of cellular division arrest responses to α-factor, that is, from a 1.9-fold inhibition of the rate of cell passage through start at 0.17 nM α-factor to a 125±5 h maximum arrest at saturating α-factor concentrations of >170 nM. The possible significance of this observation toward the mechanism of α-factor-induced cell division arrest is discussed.     

Receptor Inhibition of Pheromone Signaling Is Mediated by the Ste4p Gβ Subunit

The pheromone response pathway of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is initiated in MATa cells by binding of α-factor to the α-factor receptor. MATa cells in which the a-factor receptor is inappropriately expressed exhibit reduced pheromone signaling, a phenomenon termed receptor inhibition. In cells undergoing receptor inhibition, activation of the signaling pathway occurs normally at early time points but decreases after prolonged exposure to pheromone. Mutations that suppress the effects of receptor inhibition were obtained in the STE4 gene, which encodes the β-subunit of the G protein that transmits the pheromone response signal. These mutations mapped to the N terminus and second WD repeat of Ste4p in regions that are not part of its G_α binding surface. A STE4 allele containing several of these mutations, called STE4^SD13, reversed the signaling defect seen at late times in cells undergoing receptor inhibition but had no effect on the basal activity of the pathway. Moreover, the signaling properties of STE4^SD13 were indistinguishable from those of STE4 in wild-type MATa and MATα cells. These results demonstrate that the effect of the STE4^SD13 allele is specific to the receptor inhibition function of STE4. STE4^SD13 suppressed the signaling defect conferred by receptor inhibition in a MATa strain containing a deletion of GPA1, the G protein α-subunit gene; however, STE4^SD13 had no effect in a MATα strain containing a GPA1 deletion. Suppression of receptor inhibition by STE4^SD13 in a MATa strain containing a GPA1 deletion was unaffected by deletion of STE2, the α-factor receptor gene. The results presented here are consistent with a model in which an a-specific gene product other than Ste2p detects the presence of the a-factor receptor and blocks signaling by inhibiting the function of Ste4p.     

Role of α-Factor and the Mfα1 α-Factor Precursor in Mating in Yeast

The peptide pheromones secreted by a and α cells (called a-factor and α-factor, respectively) are each encoded by two structural genes. For strains of either mating type, addition of exogenous pheromone does not alleviate the mating defect of mutants with disruptions of both structural genes. In addition, a particular insertion mutation in the major α-factor structural gene (MFα1) that should result in an altered product inhibits α mating. These results suggested that the pheromone precursors (the MFα1 pro region in particular) might play a second role in mating separate from the role of pheromone production. To analyze the role of α-factor and the MFα1 precursor in α mating, we have constructed two classes of mutants. The mating defects of mutants that should produce the MFα1 pro region peptide but no α-factor could not be alleviated by addition of exogenous α-factor in crosses to a wild-type a strain, indicating that the previous results were not due to an inability of the disruption mutants to produce the pro region peptide. Mutants able to produce α-factor, but with a variety of alterations in MFα1 precursor structure, mated at levels proportional to the levels of α-factor produced, suggesting that the only role of the α-factor precursor in mating is to produce α-factor. Both of these results argue against a role for the MFα1 pro region separate from its role in α-factor production. We also describe results that show that in vivo production of α-factor'' (the form of α-factor encoded by one of the two α-factor repeats of MFα2) is equivalent to the major form of α-factor for induction of all responses necessary for mating. We discuss the implications of these results on the role of the pheromones in mating.     

The effect of α-factor on the rate of cell-cycle initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae : α-Factor modulates transition probability in yeast

The rate of cell-cycle initiation was studied in a-cells of S. cerevisiae in the presence of the synthetic analogue of α-factor [N-Trp, Arg⁷]-α-factor (TA-αF). It was shown that TA-αF lowers the rate constant of cell-cycle initiation (or transition probability) for each separate cell. It was concluded on the basis of these results that the term ‘arrest’ in G1 by α-factor should be interpreted in a quantitative sense as the decrease in the probability of the emergence from ‘start’ per unit time and not as being equivalent to an ‘all-or-none’ response. The dependence of the rate constant of the cell-cycle initiation on the concentration of TA-αF can be described by the Hill equation where n = 1.01 + 0.05 and K = 14.5 ± 2.5 nM (±S.E.). It is demonstrated that after transfer of cells into the medium with a higher or a lower concentration of TA-αF, the rate constant of cell-cycle initiation changes abruptly from one value to another after a lag-period of 30 and 40 min respectively. This suggests a multistep mechanism of action for α-factor. The difference in the lag-periods allows us to suggest that α-factor exerts its action by two independent pathways. Since the Hill coefficient is practically equal to unit, no cooperative interactions are likely to be involved at least in one of these pathways. The inhibition of cell-cycle initiation can be used as a more adequate and sensitive test for biological activity of α-factor as compared to morphological measurements.     

A temperature-sensitive N-glycosylation mutant of S. cerevisiae that behaves like a cell-cycle mutant

The temperature-sensitive S. cerevisiae mutant alg1-1, defective in the N-glycosylation of proteins, shows a first cycle arrest at the non-permissive temperature of 36 °C. The cell number increases by 50% and the absorbance approximately doubles. The budding index of 0.4 at 26 °C drops to 0.15 and DNA synthesis quickly comes to a halt at 36 °C. When the temperature is lowered again, budding and DNA synthesis start after a lag of 2–3 h; α-factor prevents both these processes in cells of mating type a. In addition, cells arrested at 26 °C in G1 with α-factor also do not start budding at the non-permissive temperature after removal of α-factor. The results support recent findings obtained with tunicamycin and suggest that at least one glycoprotein is required for G1-S phase transition in yeast.     

Yeast G-proteins mediate directional sensing and polarization behaviors in response to changes in pheromone gradient direction

Yeast cells polarize by projecting up mating pheromone gradients, a classic cell polarity behavior. However, these chemical gradients may shift direction. We examine how yeast cells sense and respond to a 180^o switch in the direction of microfluidically generated pheromone gradients. We identify two behaviors: at low concentrations of α-factor, the initial projection grows by bending, whereas at high concentrations, cells form a second projection toward the new source. Mutations that increase heterotrimeric G-protein activity expand the bending-growth morphology to high concentrations; mutations that increase Cdc42 activity result in second projections at low concentrations. Gradient-sensing projection bending requires interaction between Gβγ and Cdc24, whereas gradient-nonsensing projection extension is stimulated by Bem1 and hyperactivated Cdc42. Of interest, a mutation in Gα affects both bending and extension. Finally, we find a genetic perturbation that exhibits both behaviors. Overexpression of the formin Bni1, a component of the polarisome, makes both bending-growth projections and second projections at low and high α-factor concentrations, suggesting a role for Bni1 downstream of the heterotrimeric G-protein and Cdc42 during gradient sensing and response. Thus we demonstrate that G-proteins modulate in a ligand-dependent manner two fundamental cell-polarity behaviors in response to gradient directional change.     

Asg7p-Ste3p inhibition of pheromone signaling: regulation of the zygotic transition to vegetative growth

The inappropriate expression of the a-factor pheromone receptor (Ste3p) in the MATa cell leads to a striking inhibition of the yeast pheromone response, the result of a functional interaction between Ste3p and some MATa-specific protein. The present work identifies this protein as Asg7p. Normally, expression of Ste3p and Asg7p is limited to distinct haploid mating types, Ste3p to MATalpha cells and Asg7p to MATa cells. Artificial coexpression of the two in the same cell, either a or alpha, leads to dramatic inhibition of the pheromone response. Ste3p-Asg7p coexpression also perturbs the membrane trafficking of Ste3p: Ste3p turnover is slowed, a result of an Asg7p-mediated retardation of the secretory delivery of the newly synthesized receptor to the plasma membrane. However, in the absence of ectopic Ste3p expression, the asg7Delta mutation is without consequence either for pheromone signaling or overall mating efficiency of a cells. Indeed, the sole phenotype that can be assigned to MATa asg7Delta cells is observed following zygotic fusion to its alpha mating partner. Though formed at wild-type efficiency, zygotes from these pairings are morphologically abnormal. The pattern of growth is deranged: emergence of the first mitotic bud is delayed, and, in its place, growth is apparently diverted into a novel structure superficially resembling the polarized mating projection characteristic of haploid cells responding to pheromone. Together these results suggest a mechanism in which, following the zygotic fusion event, Ste3p and Asg7p gain access to one another and together act to repress the pheromone response, promoting the transition of the new diploid cell to vegetative growth.     

Localized secretion of acid phosphatase reflects the pattern of cell surface growth in saccharomyces cerevisiae

Secretion of cell wall-bound acid phosphatase by Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurs along a restricted portion of the cell surface. Acid phosphatase activity produced during derepressed synthesis on a phosphate-limited growth medium is detected with an enzyme-specific stain and is localized initially to the bud portion of a dividing cell. After two to three generations of phosphate-limited growth, most of the cells can be stained; if further phosphatase synthesis is repressed by growth in excess phosphate, dividing cells are produced in which the parent but not the bud can be stained. Budding growth is interrupted in α-mating-type cells by a pheromone (α-factor) secreted by the opposite mating type; cell surface growth continues in the presence of α-factor and produces a characteristic cell tip. When acid phosphatase synthesis is initiated during α-factor treatment, only the cell tip can br stained; when phosphate synthesis is repressed during α-factor treatment, the cell body but not the tip can be stained. A mixture of derepressed α cells and phosphatase-negative α cells form zygotes in which mainly one parent cell surface can be stained. The cell cycle mutant, cdc 24 (Hartwell, L.H. 1971. Exp. Cell Res. 69:265-276), fails to bud and, instead, expands symmetrically as a sphere at a nonpermissive temperature (37 degrees C). This mutant does not form a cell tip during α-factor treatment at 37 degrees C, and although acid phosphatade secretion occurs at this temperature, it is not localized. These results suggest that secretion reflects a polar mode of yeast cell- surface growth, and that this organization requires the cdc 24 gene product.