Cotranslational Folding of Proteins

We suppose that folding of proteins occurs cotranslationally by the following scheme. The polypeptide chains enter the folding sites from protein translocation complexes (ribosome, translocation machinery incorporated in membranes) directionally with the N-terminus and gradually. The chain starts to fold as soon as its N-terminal residue enters the folding site from the translocation complex. The folding process accompanies the translocation of the chain to its folding site and is completed after the C-terminal residue leaves the translocation complex. Proteins fold in sequential stages, by translocation of their polypeptide into folding compartments. At each stage a particular conformation of the N-terminal part of the chain that has emerged from the translocation complex is formed. The formation of both the particular conformations of the N-terminal chain segment at each folding stage and the final native protein conformation at the last stage occurs in a time that does not exceed the duration of the fastest elongation cycle on the ribosome.     

Protein folding

The problem of protein folding is that how proteins acquire their native unique three‐dimensional structure in the physiological milieu. To solve the problem, the following key questions should be answered: do proteins fold co‐ or post‐translationally, i.e. during or after biosynthesis, what is the mechanism of protein folding, and what is the explanation for fast folding of proteins? The two first questions are discussed in the current review. The general lines are to show that the opinion, that proteins fold after they are synthesized is hardly substantiated and suitable for solving the problem of protein folding and why proteins should fold cotranslationally. A possible tentative model for the mechanism of protein folding is also suggested. To this end, a thorough analysis is made of the biosynthesis, delivery to the folding compartments, and the rates of the biosynthesis, translocation and folding of proteins. A cursory attention is assigned to the role of GroEL/ES‐like chaperonins in protein folding.     

A model study of protein nascent chain and cotranslational folding using hydrophobic-polar residues

To study protein nascent chain folding during biosynthesis, we investigate the folding behavior of models of hydrophobic and polar (HP) chains at growing length using both two-dimensional square lattice model and an optimized three-dimensional 4-state discrete off-lattice model. After enumerating all possible sequences and conformations of HP heteropolymers up to length N = 18 and N = 15 in two and three-dimensional space, respectively, we examine changes in adopted structure, stability, and tolerance to single point mutation as the nascent chain grows. In both models, we find that stable model proteins have fewer folded nascent chains during growth, and often will only fold after reaching full length. For the few occasions where partial chains of stable proteins fold, these partial conformations on average are very similar to the corresponding parts of the final conformations at full length. Conversely, we find that sequences with fewer stable nascent chains and sequences with native-like folded nascent chains are more stable. In addition, these stable sequences in general can have many more point mutations and still fold into the same conformation as the wild type sequence. Our results suggest that stable proteins are less likely to be trapped in metastable conformations during biosynthesis, and are more resistant to point-mutations. Our results also imply that less stable proteins will require the assistance of chaperone and other factors during nascent chain folding. Taken together with other reported studies, it seems that cotranslational folding may not be a general mechanism of in vivo protein folding for small proteins, and in vitro folding studies are still relevant for understanding how proteins fold biologically.     

All-atom ab initio folding of a diverse set of proteins

Natural proteins fold to a unique, thermodynamically dominant state. Modeling of the folding process and prediction of the native fold of proteins are two major unsolved problems in biophysics. Here, we show successful all-atom ab initio folding of a representative diverse set of proteins by using a minimalist transferable-energy model that consists of two-body atom-atom interactions, hydrogen bonding, and a local sequence-energy term that models sequence-specific chain stiffness. Starting from a random coil, the native-like structure was observed during replica exchange Monte Carlo (REMC) simulation for most proteins regardless of their structural classes; the lowest energy structure was close to native-in the range of 2-6 A root-mean-square deviation (rmsd). Our results demonstrate that the successful folding of a protein chain to its native state is governed by only a few crucial energetic terms.     

Protein folding and translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane (Review)

Proteins destined for secretion are translocated across or inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane whereupon they fold and assemble to their native state before their subsequent transport to the Golgi apparatus. Proteins that fail to fold correctly are translocated back across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane to the cytosol where they become substrates for the cytosolic degradative machinery. Central to translocation is a protein pore in the membrane called the translocon that allows passage of proteins in and out of the endoplasmic reticulum. It is clear that the conformation of the polypeptide chain influences the translocation process and that there is a temporal relationship between modification of the chain, translocation and folding. This review will consider when and how the polypeptide chain folds, and how this might influence translocation into and out of the ER; and discuss how protein folding might affect post-translational modification of the polypeptide chain following translocation into the ER lumen.     

Protein folding and translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Proteins destined for secretion are translocated across or inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane whereupon they fold and assemble to their native state before their subsequent transport to the Golgi apparatus. Proteins that fail to fold correctly are translocated back across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane to the cytosol where they become substrates for the cytosolic degradative machinery. Central to translocation is a protein pore in the membrane called the translocon that allows passage of proteins in and out of the endoplasmic reticulum. It is clear that the conformation of the polypeptide chain influences the translocation process and that there is a temporal relationship between modification of the chain, translocation and folding. This review will consider when and how the polypeptide chain folds, and how this might influence translocation into and out of the ER; and discuss how protein folding might affect post-translational modification of the polypeptide chain following translocation into the ER lumen.     

Folding studies of immunoglobulin-like beta-sandwich proteins suggest that they share a common folding pathway.

BACKGROUND: Are folding pathways conserved in protein families? To test this explicitly and ask to what extent structure specifies folding pathways requires comparison of proteins with a common fold. Our strategy is to choose members of a highly diverse protein family with no conservation of function and little or no sequence identity, but with structures that are essentially the same. The immunoglobulin-like fold is one of the most common structural families, and is subdivided into superfamilies with no detectable evolutionary or functional relationship. RESULTS: We compared the folding of a number of immunoglobulin-like proteins that have a common structural core and found a strong correlation between folding rate and stability. The results suggest that the folding pathways of these immunoglobulin-like proteins share common features. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to compare the folding of structurally related proteins that are members of different superfamilies. The most likely explanation for the results is that interactions that are important in defining the structure of immunoglobulin-like proteins are also used to guide folding.     

The protein folding 'speed limit'

How fast can a protein possibly fold? This question has stimulated experimentalists to seek fast folding proteins and to engineer them to fold even faster. Proteins folding at or near the speed limit are prime candidates for all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. They may also have no free energy barrier, allowing the direct observation of intermediate structures on the pathways from the unfolded to the folded state. Both experimental and theoretical approaches predict a speed limit of approximately N/100micros for a generic N-residue single-domain protein, with alpha proteins folding faster than beta or alphabeta. The predicted limits suggest that most known ultrafast folding proteins can be engineered to fold more than ten times faster.     

Native Topology of the Designed Protein Top7 is Not Conducive to Cooperative Folding

Many single-domain proteins with <100 residues fold cooperatively; but the recently designed 92-residue Top7 protein exhibits clearly non-two-state behaviors. In apparent agreement with experiment, we found that coarse-grained, native-centric chain models, including potentials with and without elementary desolvation barriers, predicted that Top7 has a stable intermediate state in which the C-terminal fragment is folded while the rest of the chain remains disordered. We observed noncooperative folding in Top7 models that incorporated nonnative hydrophobic interactions as well. In contrast, free energy profiles deduced from models with desolvation barriers for a set of thirteen natural proteins with similar chain lengths and secondary structure elements suggested that they fold much more cooperatively than Top7. Buttressed by related studies on smaller natural proteins with chain lengths of ∼40 residues, our findings argue that the de novo native topology of Top7 likely imposed a significant restriction on the cooperativity achievable by any design for this target structure.     

The structure of precursor proteins during import into mitochondria

Precursor proteins must be at least partially unfolded during import into mitochondria, but their actual conformation during translocation is not known. Are proteins fully unfolded and threaded through the import machinery amino acid by amino acid, or do they retain some partial structure? The folding pathway of most proteins in vitro contains a partially folded intermediate known as the molten globule state, and it has been suggested that proteins are in the molten globule state during translocation across membranes. Here we show that precursors are normally fully unfolded during import into mitochondria. However, precursors containing residual structure can be imported, if less efficiently.     

Distinguishing between sequential and nonsequentially folded proteins: implications for folding and misfolding.

We describe here an algorithm for distinguishing sequential from nonsequentially folding proteins. Several experiments have recently suggested that most of the proteins that are synthesized in the eukaryotic cell may fold sequentially. This proposed folding mechanism in vivo is particularly advantageous to the organism. In the absence of chaperones, the probability that a sequentially folding protein will misfold is reduced significantly. The problem we address here is devising a procedure that would differentiate between the two types of folding patterns. Footprints of sequential folding may be found in structures where consecutive fragments of the chain interact with each other. In such cases, the folding complexity may be viewed as being lower. On the other hand, higher folding complexity suggests that at least a portion of the polypeptide backbone folds back upon itself to form three-dimensional (3D) interactions with noncontiguous portion(s) of the chain. Hence, we look at the mechanism of folding of the molecule via analysis of its complexity, that is, through the 3D interactions formed by contiguous segments on the polypeptide chain. To computationally splice the structure into consecutively interacting fragments, we either cut it into compact hydrophobic folding units or into a set of hypothetical, transient, highly populated, contiguous fragments ("building blocks" of the structure). In sequential folding, successive building blocks interact with each other from the amino to the carboxy terminus of the polypeptide chain. Consequently, the results of the parsing differentiate between sequentially vs. nonsequentially folded chains. The automated assessment of the folding complexity provides insight into both the likelihood of misfolding and the kinetic folding rate of the given protein. In terms of the funnel free energy landscape theory, a protein that truly follows the mechanism of sequential folding, in principle, encounters smoother free energy barriers. A simple sequentially folded protein should, therefore, be less error prone and fold faster than a protein with a complex folding pattern.     

Dynamic polyhedral models of globular proteins

We have devised several mechanical models of globular proteins by approximating them to various polyhedra (dodecahedron, truncated octahedron, icosahedron, truncated icosahedron). The models comprise hollow blocks linked together in a flexible chain. Between blocks there is a set of several reversible, weak magnetic interactions such that when the chain is agitated, it will fold into a stable polyhedral structure about the size of a hand. Folding may be followed in real time with a video camera. Key to the success of the folding process is the lightness of the chain. Several side chains may also be added to the blocks such that they come together to create a polyhedral core when the chain folds. The models have a number of similarities to globular proteins: each chain folds into a unique, but dynamic, three-dimensional structure; the instructions that determine this structure are built into the configuration of blocks; and it is difficult to predict this structure given the unfolded block configuration. Furthermore, the chains fold quickly, generally in less than a minute, several pathways are involved, and these pathways progress through elements of "native" structure. In particular, the models emphasize the importance of restricted conformational mobility in assisting the chain to fold, and also in eliminating undesirable interactions. Because of these similarities to globular proteins, we believe that the polyhedral models will, with continued development, be helpful in understanding the protein folding process, while at the same time acting as valuable educational visual aids. They might also inspire the construction of new types of microscopic, self-assembling devices.     

Metamorphic protein folding as evolutionary adaptation

Metamorphic proteins switch reversibly between multiple distinct, stable structures, often with different functions. It was previously hypothesized that metamorphic proteins arose as intermediates in the evolution of a new fold – rare and transient exceptions to the ‘one sequence, one fold’ paradigm. However, as described herein, mounting evidence suggests that metamorphic folding is an adaptive feature, preserved and optimized over evolutionary time as exemplified by the NusG family and the chemokine XCL1. Analysis of extant protein families and resurrected protein ancestors demonstrates that large regions of sequence space are compatible with metamorphic folding. As a category that enhances biological fitness, metamorphic proteins are likely to employ fold switching to perform important biological functions and may be more common than previously thought.     

Conservation of folding and stability within a protein family: the tyrosine corner as an evolutionary cul-de-sac

What are the selective pressures on protein sequences during evolution? Amino acid residues may be highly conserved for functional or structural (stability) reasons. Theoretical studies have proposed that residues involved in the folding nucleus may also be highly conserved. To test this we are using an experimental "fold approach" to the study of protein folding. This compares the folding and stability of a number of proteins that share the same fold, but have no common amino acid sequence or biological activity. The fold selected for this study is the immunoglobulin-like beta-sandwich fold, which is a fold that has no specifically conserved function. Four model proteins are used from two distinct superfamilies that share the immunoglobulin-like fold, the fibronectin type III and immunoglobulin superfamilies. Here, the fold approach and protein engineering are used to question the role of a highly conserved tyrosine in the "tyrosine corner" motif that is found ubiquitously and exclusively in Greek key proteins. In the four model beta-sandwich proteins characterised here, the tyrosine is the only residue that is absolutely conserved at equivalent sites. By mutating this position to phenylalanine, we show that the tyrosine hydroxyl is not required to nucleate folding in the immunoglobulin superfamily, whereas it is involved to some extent in early structure formation in the fibronectin type III superfamily. The tyrosine corner is important for stability, mutation to phenylalanine costs between 1.5 and 3 kcal mol(-1). We propose that the high level of conservation of the tyrosine is related to the structural restraints of the loop connecting the beta-sheets, representing an evolutionary "cul-de-sac".     

Construction and characterization of chimeric proteins composed of type-1 and type-2 periplasmic binding proteins MglB and ArgT

The respective type-1 and type-2 periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs) MglB and ArgT are believed to have evolved from a common ancestor into siblings showing topological differences in their main chain connectivity. At first glance, they show similar structure. But, more detailed examination reveals that the chain connectivity of ArgT is more convoluted than that of MglB. Reflecting that complexity, the folding of ArgT is complicated and involves intermediate folds. On the other hand, the folding of MglB is a simple two-state transition. In the present study, we constructed and characterized several chimeras made up of various subdomains of MglB and ArgT with the aim of gaining insight into the evolution of protein folding and protein structure. Although these chimeras did not fold as compactly as their parental proteins, some did exhibit cooperative folding, which suggests that novel proteins with new connectivity and new folding pathways could have emerged at a fairly high rate throughout the evolution of proteins.     

Protein folding during cotranslational translocation in the endoplasmic reticulum

To test how far into the protein-conducting channel of the translocon complex a nascent polypeptide domain must move before it can fold, we analyzed the folding of in vitro translated products of truncated mRNAs encoding the Semliki Forest virus capsid protease domain (Cp) during translocation into microsomes. Cp folded when the C-terminal linker connecting it to the peptidyltransferase center was 64 amino acids or longer. This means that to fold, Cp must exit the translocon channel. With an uncleaved signal sequence, about one out of four of the Cp domains could undergo folding with a C-terminal linker of only 38-66 amino acids. This suggested that the constraint imposed on folding by the translocon complex may be less stringent for signal-anchored membrane proteins.     

Towards a consistent modeling of protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity: how applicable is the transition state picture to folding and unfolding?

To what extent do general features of folding/unfolding kinetics of small globular proteins follow from their thermodynamic properties? To address this question, we investigate a new simplified protein chain model that embodies a cooperative interplay between local conformational preferences and hydrophobic burial. The present four-helix-bundle 55mer model exhibits protein-like calorimetric two-state cooperativity. It rationalizes native-state hydrogen exchange observations. Our analysis indicates that a coherent, self-consistent physical account of both the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the model leads naturally to the concept of a native state ensemble that encompasses considerable conformational fluctuations. Such a multiple-conformation native state is seen to involve conformational states similar to those revealed by native-state hydrogen exchange. Many of these conformational states are predicted to lie below native baselines commonly used in interpreting calorimetric data. Folding and unfolding kinetics are studied under a range of intrachain interaction strengths as in experimental chevron plots. Kinetically determined transition midpoints match well with their thermodynamic counterparts. Kinetic relaxations are found to be essentially single-exponential over an extended range of model interaction strengths. This includes the entire unfolding regime and a significant part of a folding regime with a chevron rollover, as has been observed for real proteins that fold with non-two-state kinetics. The transition state picture of protein folding and unfolding is evaluated by comparing thermodynamic free energy profiles with actual kinetic rates. These analyses suggest that some chevron rollovers may arise from an internal frictional effect that increasingly impedes chain motions with more native conditions, rather than being caused by discrete deadtime folding intermediates or shifts of the transition state peak as previously posited.     

A framework for describing topological frustration in models of protein folding

In a natively folded protein of moderate or larger size, the protein backbone may weave through itself in complex ways, raising questions about what sequence of events might have to occur in order for the protein to reach its native configuration from the unfolded state. A mathematical framework is presented here for describing the notion of a topological folding barrier, which occurs when a protein chain must pass through a hole or opening, formed by other regions of the protein structure. Different folding pathways encounter different numbers of such barriers and therefore different degrees of frustration. A dynamic programming algorithm finds the optimal theoretical folding path and minimal degree of frustration for a protein based on its natively folded configuration. Calculations over a database of protein structures provide insights into questions such as whether the path of minimal frustration might tend to favor folding from one or from many sites of folding nucleation, or whether proteins favor folding around the N terminus, thereby providing support for the hypothesis that proteins fold co-translationally. The computational methods are applied to a multi-disulfide bonded protein, with computational findings that are consistent with the experimentally observed folding pathway. Attention is drawn to certain complex protein folds for which the computational method suggests there may be a preferred site of nucleation or where folding is likely to proceed through a relatively well-defined pathway or intermediate. The computational analyses lead to testable models for protein folding.     

The role of heat-shock and chaperone proteins in protein folding: possible molecular mechanisms.

Recently some heat-shock proteins have been linked to functions of 'chaperoning' protein folding in vivo. Here current experimental evidence is reviewed and possible requirements for such an activity are discussed. It is proposed that one mode of chaperone action is to actively unfold misfolded or badly aggregated proteins to a conformation from which they could refold spontaneously; that improperly folded proteins are recognized by excessive stretches of solvent-exposed backbone, rather than by exposed hydrophobic patches; and that the molecular mechanism for unfolding is either repeated binding and dissociation ('plucking') or translocation of the protein backbone through a binding cleft ('threading'), allowing the threaded chain to refold spontaneously. The observed hydrolysis of ATP would provide the energy for active unfolding. These hypotheses can be applied to both monomeric folding and oligomeric assembly and are sufficiently detailed to be open to directed experimental verification.     

Probing possible downhill folding: native contact topology likely places a significant constraint on the folding cooperativity of proteins with approximately 40 residues

Experiments point to appreciable variations in folding cooperativity among natural proteins with approximately 40 residues, indicating that the behaviors of these proteins are valuable for delineating the contributing factors to cooperative folding. To explore the role of native topology in a protein's propensity to fold cooperatively and how native topology might constrain the degree of cooperativity achievable by a given set of physical interactions, we compared folding/unfolding kinetics simulated using three classes of native-centric C^α chain models with different interaction schemes. The approach was applied to two homologous 45-residue fragments from the peripheral subunit-binding domain family and a 39-residue fragment of the N-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L9. Free-energy profiles as functions of native contact number were computed to assess the heights of thermodynamic barriers to folding. In addition, chevron plots of folding/unfolding rates were constructed as functions of native stability to facilitate comparison with available experimental data. Although common Gō-like models with pairwise Lennard-Jones-type interactions generally fold less cooperatively than real proteins, the rank ordering of cooperativity predicted by these models is consistent with experiment for the proteins investigated, showing increasing folding cooperativity with increasing nonlocality of a protein's native contacts. Models that account for water-expulsion (desolvation) barriers and models with many-body (nonadditive) interactions generally entail higher degrees of folding cooperativity indicated by more linear model chevron plots, but the rank ordering of cooperativity remains unchanged. A robust, experimentally valid rank ordering of model folding cooperativity independent of the multiple native-centric interaction schemes tested here argues that native topology places significant constraints on how cooperatively a protein can fold.